<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Stock Futures Down on Libya Unrest]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/22/u-s-stock-futures-down-on-libya-unrest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/22/u-s-stock-futures-down-on-libya-unrest/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/22/u-s-stock-futures-down-on-libya-unrest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/odp/" rel="tag">Office Depot (ODP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" alt="" />U.S. stock futures are lower this morning as unrest continues in the major oil-producing state of Libya. Futures for the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average/%24indu/dji">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> tumbled 100 points to 12,275.00, while those for the S&amp;P 500 index dropped 16.6 points to 1,325.60. Futures for the Nasdaq 100 declined 36 points to 2,359.00.<br />
<br />
U.S. stocks closed higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average gaining 0.59% the Nasdaq 100 index rising 0.08% and S&amp;P 500 index gaining 0.19%. U.S. markets were closed on Monday for the Presidents' Day holiday.<br />
<br />
Data on Case-Shiller <a class="inlinked" href="http://realestate.aol.com/information/home-prices">home prices</a> for February will be released at 9 a.m. ET. However, the February Conference Board consumer-confidence survey will be released at 10 a.m. ET.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/22/u-s-stock-futures-down-on-libya-unrest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Stock Futures Down on Libya Unrest</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/22/u-s-stock-futures-down-on-libya-unrest/">U.S. Stock Futures Down on Libya Unrest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/22/u-s-stock-futures-down-on-libya-unrest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19853904/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/22/u-s-stock-futures-down-on-libya-unrest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earning</category><category>featured</category><category>hd</category><category>m</category><category>odp</category><category>premarket</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Raznick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Establishing a position in Riverbed Technology ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/establishing-a-position-in-riverbed-technology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/establishing-a-position-in-riverbed-technology/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/establishing-a-position-in-riverbed-technology/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-transcripts/" rel="tag">Earnings Transcripts</a></p><div><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville </a>contributor Smita Sadana<br /></em></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><br />I have established a small trading position in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/riverbed-technology-inc/rvbd/nas">Riverbed Technology </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/riverbed-technology-inc/rvbd/nas">RVBD</a>), after it announced earnings. Here's why:</div>
<ul>
    <li>Earnings beat expectations. RVBD reported EPS of 13 cents vs. consensus of 10 cents. The revenue number was also higher. <br /><br /></li>
    <li>Several brokers have enthusiastically raised their targets for RVBD. Lazard Capital raised the price target from $14 to $17, and Wedbush and William Blair upgraded the stock. <br /><br /></li>
    <li>The percentage of float shorted was 21% at the beginning of April. This stands out as the most interesting piece of data for a trader like me. Given the ignition provided by the good earnings announcement, wouldn't the shorts rush to cover? </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/establishing-a-position-in-riverbed-technology/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Establishing a position in Riverbed Technology </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/establishing-a-position-in-riverbed-technology/">Establishing a position in Riverbed Technology </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/establishing-a-position-in-riverbed-technology/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1527159/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/establishing-a-position-in-riverbed-technology/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earning</category><category>rvbd</category><category>tech</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Suntech Power (STP) delivers solid quarter; SOLF downgrade affects sector]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/suntech-power-stp-delivers-solid-quarter-solf-downgrade-affec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/suntech-power-stp-delivers-solid-quarter-solf-downgrade-affec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/suntech-power-stp-delivers-solid-quarter-solf-downgrade-affec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tsl/" rel="tag">Trina Solar ADS (TSL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stp/" rel="tag">Suntech Power Hldgs ADS (STP)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/suntech-power-holdings-co-ltd/stp/nys">Suntech Power Holdings Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/suntech-power-holdings-co-ltd/stp/nys">STP</a>), which saw its stock surge some 150% in 2007, didn't have such a good 2008 so far with its stock plunging about 44% year-to-date. But since setting a 52-week low of $28.19 on March 22, the stock has rebounded nicely, up over 55%. Roller coaster or what?!
<p> </p>
Well, today, the maker of photovoltaic cells and modules said <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/suntech-reports-first-quarter-2008/rfid105573801">first-quarter earnings</a> more than doubled on 76% higher revenue. Earnings reached $55.8 million, or 33 cents an American depositary share, beating analysts estimates of 28 cents. Revenue reached $434.5 million. Gross margins also expanded nicely and Suntech reiterated revenue estimates for 2008.<br /><br />Early in the morning, STP shares jumped over 7% in premarket trading in response to the report but have not kept this up. Shares are now trading at $45.73, down over 1%, probably declining with the rest of the sector following Goldman Sachs's <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/05/22/ap5039187.html">downgrade</a> of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/solarfun-power-holdings-co-ltd/solf/nas">Solarfun</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/solarfun-power-holdings-co-ltd/solf/nas">SOLF</a>) to Sell from Neutral. SOLF shares are down over 18% taking <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ldk-solar-co-ltd/ldk/nys">LDK Solar</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ldk-solar-co-ltd/ldk/nys">LDK</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trina-solar-limited/tsl/nys">Trina Solar</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trina-solar-limited/tsl/nys">TSL</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canadian-solar-inc-common-shares/csiq/nas">Canadian Solar</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canadian-solar-inc-common-shares/csiq/nas">CSIQ</a>) down with it -- 5%, 8% and 13% respectively, to name but a few.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/suntech-power-stp-delivers-solid-quarter-solf-downgrade-affec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Suntech Power (STP) delivers solid quarter; SOLF downgrade affects sector</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/suntech-power-stp-delivers-solid-quarter-solf-downgrade-affec/">Suntech Power (STP) delivers solid quarter; SOLF downgrade affects sector</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 May 2008 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2247669020080522>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/suntech-power-stp-delivers-solid-quarter-solf-downgrade-affec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1203222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/suntech-power-stp-delivers-solid-quarter-solf-downgrade-affec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>canadian solar</category><category>CanadianSolar</category><category>csiq</category><category>earning</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ldk</category><category>ldk solar</category><category>LdkSolar</category><category>solarfun</category><category>solf</category><category>stp</category><category>suntech power</category><category>SuntechPower</category><category>tsl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer credit numbers prove we're not scared yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bk/" rel="tag">Bank of New York (BK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img width="250" height="NaN" align="right" alt="credit help banner" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/badcredit.jpg" />Consumers are still willing to run their lives based on credit, so says an <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/credit-card-debt-spikes-in-november/20080108155209990001">Associated Press report</a>. Consumer borrowing increased at an annual rate of 7.4% in November compared to an increase of just 1% in October - ah yes, the faux magic of a consumerist Christmas.<br /><br />The truth of the matter rests in the cause for the rise. Is it because consumers are still confident in their <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/moms-rising-bringing-a-subtle-workplace-issue-up-front/">earning</a> potential? The more likely cause is that consumers are running out of funding options, read that -- they're running out of cash.<br /><br />So why is it that mortgages are getting harder to write but consumer purchases can still be funded with just a signature? Although they're deflating in value, homes still provide significant backing for lenders to lean their bets on whereas credit cards float in the unknown. With bankruptcies at an all time high, are we setting up for the final crash?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer credit numbers prove we're not scared yet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/">Consumer credit numbers prove we're not scared yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/credit-card-debt-spikes-in-november/20080108155209990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1082333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/consumer-credit-numbers-prove-were-not-scared-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>banks</category><category>borrowing</category><category>consumer</category><category>credit</category><category>debt</category><category>dollar</category><category>earning</category><category>housing</category><category>lending</category><category>mortgage</category><category>real-estate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Moms Rising: Bringing an important workplace issue up front]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/moms-rising-bringing-a-subtle-workplace-issue-up-front/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/moms-rising-bringing-a-subtle-workplace-issue-up-front/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/moms-rising-bringing-a-subtle-workplace-issue-up-front/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/vanablog01.jpg" />So you've had a new baby. Congratulations! Now put that thing down and get back to work or we'll dock your pay.</strong> </p>
<p>That's the subtle message being insidiously delivered to working moms nation wide. Now there's a social / political action group actively working to change that scenario. <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/11/pf/moms_rising/index.htm?postversion=2007011109">A report provided by CNN Money.com</a> reveals that Moms Rising, a well organized group with increasing power, has amassed a membership of nearly 80,000 since May of 2006. I would call that a bit of a ground swell. They are "taking it to the streets" and to the legislators and to the unions and, they intend, to the board rooms. They don't want to toss their babies aside in pursuit of wages after giving birth. They are demanding that this nation's employers take notice of the extreme value of properly raised children and they're tired of paying an unfair price for recognizing that truth.</p>
<p>Moms Rising Executive Director, Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner states that US employment policies are lacking and unfair in the way they address middle and lower class working families dealing with child rearing issues. I think she's right and she has the statistics to support that position. A Cornell University study has shown that mothers of professional status were 44% less likely to be hired when compared with their non-mother counterparts and that they would be offered as much as $11,000 lower starting salaries on average. Moms Rising seeks to make family status a taboo matter when being considered for a job. It's not right that your status as a parent would count against you if you're the most qualified applicant for a position. Remember that single and divorced dads figure into this situation also. Given the vast and varied custody arrangements floating around these days, being a child's part time care giver shouldn't count against daddy either.</p>
<p>The major area of focus for Moms Rising is paid leave for addressing child care and rearing issues. This is a hotbed of contention and will most likely require serious pressure and lobbying from more than one group. This is why Moms Rising encourages and supports all positive means of activism which are undertaken by their members and any interested satellite organizations. Moms Rising sees no differentiation between social or economic classes when it comes to fair treatment and compensation for those individuals who are raising children. This is about parents not being penalized for having kids. It's that clear and it's that simple.</p>
<p>I for one don't much have to deal with the problem of sacrificing pay to care for my child. My employer has made it clear that raising children is done at your own peril. They won't compensate one cent for absences involved with child rearing, unless you use your own vacation time for it. I'm one of the lucky ones here. My lovely wife is a stay-at-home mom. I guess there are certain advantages to childcare being so outrageously expensive and wages being so low that it's impractical and unaffordable for my wife to go back to work outside the home.</p>
<p>Now ain't that just a kick in the head.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/moms-rising-bringing-a-subtle-workplace-issue-up-front/">Moms Rising: Bringing an important workplace issue up front</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/11/pf/moms_rising/index.htm?postversion=2007011109>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/moms-rising-bringing-a-subtle-workplace-issue-up-front/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/734967/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/moms-rising-bringing-a-subtle-workplace-issue-up-front/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earning</category><category>family leave</category><category>FamilyLeave</category><category>legislation</category><category>paid leave</category><category>PaidLeave</category><category>wages</category><category>work place ethics</category><category>working mothers</category><category>WorkingMothers</category><category>WorkPlaceEthics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:11:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
