<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Traders Exit Insurance Stocks to Avoid Earthquake Exposure]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/14/traders-exit-insurance-stocks-to-avoid-earthquake-exposure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/14/traders-exit-insurance-stocks-to-avoid-earthquake-exposure/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/14/traders-exit-insurance-stocks-to-avoid-earthquake-exposure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/met/" rel="tag">MetLife Inc. (MET)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pru/" rel="tag">Prudential Financial (PRU)</a></p><p><a href="http://investor.metlife.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=121171&amp;p=irol-irhome" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/03/met-metlife-logo.jpg" alt="MET logo" /></a>MetLife (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys">MET</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today along with most other insurance companies this morning after the cost to insurers related to Friday's earthquake in Japan was estimated to be <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110313-701979.html" target="_blank">between $15 to $35 billion</a>. Prudential Financial (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/prudential-financial-inc/pru/nys">PRU</a>) and AIG (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) are also down so far in today's trading. Even if these insurance companies are actually on solid footing financially with regard to their expected claims, I expect investors could be frightened for several months to come, which could keep share prices depressed. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on MET.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/14/traders-exit-insurance-stocks-to-avoid-earthquake-exposure/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Traders Exit Insurance Stocks to Avoid Earthquake Exposure</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/14/traders-exit-insurance-stocks-to-avoid-earthquake-exposure/">Traders Exit Insurance Stocks to Avoid Earthquake Exposure</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/14/traders-exit-insurance-stocks-to-avoid-earthquake-exposure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19878920/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/14/traders-exit-insurance-stocks-to-avoid-earthquake-exposure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>earthquake</category><category>insurance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>Japan</category><category>MET</category><category>MtLife</category><category>options</category><category>PRU</category><category>Prudential</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[After Christchurch, Assessing AIG's Risk to Earthquakes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/after-christchurch-assessing-aig-s-risk-to-earthquakes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/after-christchurch-assessing-aig-s-risk-to-earthquakes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/after-christchurch-assessing-aig-s-risk-to-earthquakes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="AIG flag" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/aig-flag-240.jpg" />AIG (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) is a leading international insurance organization with operations in more than 130 countries. It provides life insurance, health insurance, auto and home insurance, retirement solutions and investment plans. It competes with other established insurance companies like MetLife (<a injectedlink="" class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys">MET</a>), The Hartford (<a injectedlink="" class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-hartford-financial-services-group-inc/hig/nys">HIG</a>) and Prudential (<a injectedlink="" class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/prudential-financial-inc/pru/nys">PRU</a>).</p>
<p>We have a price estimate of <a href="https://www.trefis.com/company?hm=AIG.trefis">$30.36</a> on AIG's stock which is about 24% below the current market price.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/after-christchurch-assessing-aig-s-risk-to-earthquakes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>After Christchurch, Assessing AIG's Risk to Earthquakes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/after-christchurch-assessing-aig-s-risk-to-earthquakes/">After Christchurch, Assessing AIG's Risk to Earthquakes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/after-christchurch-assessing-aig-s-risk-to-earthquakes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19864745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/after-christchurch-assessing-aig-s-risk-to-earthquakes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>Chartis</category><category>CHrishchurch</category><category>earthquake</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NewZealand</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trefis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reinsurance Industry Approaches Record Levels]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/reinsurance-industry-approaches-record-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/reinsurance-industry-approaches-record-levels/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/reinsurance-industry-approaches-record-levels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a></p>When I started my brief stint in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/reinsurance/">reinsurance</a> business in late 2007, the words "excess capital" were on everyone's lips. Reinsurers had record capital on hand and were pushing dividends and share buybacks because they couldn't find ways to make it productive. Two years later, <a href="http://www.postonline.co.uk/reinsurance/news/1600252/aon-benfield-reinsurers-capital-recovery" target="_blank">we're getting close to those record levels</a>, according to a new report from Aon Benfield (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aon-corporation/aon/nys" target="_blank">AON</a>), despite everything that's happened in between - the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/financialcrisis/">financial crisis</a>, Hurricanes Gustav and Ike and the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/earthquake/">earthquake</a> in Chile, for example. <br />
<br />
If you look at the financials, it's almost like nothing has changed, and let's hope the lessons learned in between aren't obscured by the full pockets that reinsurers can now boast.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/reinsurance-industry-approaches-record-levels/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reinsurance Industry Approaches Record Levels</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/reinsurance-industry-approaches-record-levels/">Reinsurance Industry Approaches Record Levels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.postonline.co.uk/reinsurance/news/1600252/aon-benfield-reinsurers-capital-recovery>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/reinsurance-industry-approaches-record-levels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19431364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/reinsurance-industry-approaches-record-levels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aon</category><category>AonCorp</category><category>AonCorp.</category><category>AonCorporation</category><category>catastrophe</category><category>catastrophe insurance</category><category>catastrophes</category><category>chile earthquake</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>earthquakes</category><category>hurricane</category><category>hurricane gustav</category><category>Hurricane Ike</category><category>Hurricanes</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance companies</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>Reinsurance</category><category>reinsurance industry</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mexican Earthquake Won't Move Reinsurance Market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/mexican-earthquake-wont-move-reinsurance-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/mexican-earthquake-wont-move-reinsurance-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/mexican-earthquake-wont-move-reinsurance-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/1earthquake.jpg"  alt="" />It doesn't look like we'll see a replay of Chile in Mexico. The 7.2 magnitude <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/earthquake/">earthquake</a> on Sunday, which was felt all the way into California, is likely to have caused economic damages of $1 billion and insured losses of $300 million, <a href="http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100406/NEWS/100409959" target="_blank">according to catastrophe modeling firm EQECAT</a>. It will probably not have a significant effect on the industry, as a result, because of the relatively low level of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/catastrophe/">catastrophe</a> losses.<br />
<br />
"Although damage will have occurred in both Mexico and the U.S., the community of Mexicali is the largest urban area affected by this event, and damage there is expected to be widespread," EQECAT in a Monday statement. El Centro, California was the largest U.S. city affected by the quake, though it sustained less damage, according to estimates, than Mexicali.<br />
<br />
The earthquake was <a href="http://communities.thomsonreuters.com/ILS/508002" target="_blank">not covered by the Multicat Mex catastrophe bond</a>, which was created by the World Bank and Swiss Re (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/swiss-reinsurance-company/swcey/nao" target="_blank">SWCEY</a>) to provide protection from earthquakes and hurricanes formed in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans for three years. The $290 million bond is sponsored by the Fund for Natural Disasters of Mexico.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/mexican-earthquake-wont-move-reinsurance-market/">Mexican Earthquake Won't Move Reinsurance Market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100406/NEWS/100409959>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/mexican-earthquake-wont-move-reinsurance-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19429651/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/mexican-earthquake-wont-move-reinsurance-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>catastrophe</category><category>catastrophe insurance</category><category>catastrophes</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>earthquakes</category><category>SWCEY</category><category>swiss re</category><category>Swiss Reinsurance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[State Farm Closes First Cat Bond of Q2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/state-farm-closes-first-cat-bond-of-q2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/state-farm-closes-first-cat-bond-of-q2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/state-farm-closes-first-cat-bond-of-q2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/statefarm.jpg" alt="" />The first <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/catastrophe/">catastrophe</a> bond of the quarter closed on opening day ... and it was a big one. State Farm's Merna Re II transaction was good for $350 million in risk capital, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/catastrophe-bonds-same-but-different-in-2010/" target="_blank">upsized from the earlier reported amount of $250 million</a>. Though large, it doesn't compare to the previous Merna Re catastrophe bond, which set a record at $1.2 billion that remains to be beat.</p>
<p>Merna Re II was oversubscribed, but State Farm only wanted to place $350 million, <a href="http://communities.thomsonreuters.com/ILS/507560" target="_blank">Thomson Reuters reports</a> (registration required). According to one investor who knew about the transaction, "The deal was oversubscribed at +365 basis points and after being upsized to $350 million." The investor added, "The initial price talk was 365 - 405 bp, but the deal got priced at 365 bp. However, Merna was a simple transaction and State Farm only wanted to place 350 million."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/state-farm-closes-first-cat-bond-of-q2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>State Farm Closes First Cat Bond of Q2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/state-farm-closes-first-cat-bond-of-q2/">State Farm Closes First Cat Bond of Q2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/state-farm-closes-first-cat-bond-of-q2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19423947/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/02/state-farm-closes-first-cat-bond-of-q2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aon</category><category>aon corp</category><category>AonCorporation</category><category>catastrophe</category><category>catastrophe insurance</category><category>catastrophes</category><category>catastrophic insurance</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Reinsurance</category><category>reinsurance industry</category><category>state farm</category><category>State Farm Insurance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q1 Catastrophes May Hit Earnings, Won't Change Market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/q1-catastrophes-may-hit-earnings-won-t-change-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/q1-catastrophes-may-hit-earnings-won-t-change-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/q1-catastrophes-may-hit-earnings-won-t-change-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/chile-earthquake-240-ap.jpg" />The first quarter of 2010 will probably <a target="_blank" href="http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100331/NEWS/100339985">go down in history as the worst ever for catastrophe losses</a>.</p>
<p>According to global reinsurance broker Willis Re (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/willis-group-holdings-limited/wsh/nys">WSH</a>), the insurance industry recorded $16 billion in insured losses, from the Chile earthquake and Windstorm Xynthia in Europe, but the largest losses occurred in smaller markets, where it premium volumes aren't as large. Since the third and fourth quarters tend to be the most loss-prone of the year, a quarter that is normally quiet could set the stage for outsized losses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/q1-catastrophes-may-hit-earnings-won-t-change-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Q1 Catastrophes May Hit Earnings, Won't Change Market</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/q1-catastrophes-may-hit-earnings-won-t-change-market/">Q1 Catastrophes May Hit Earnings, Won't Change Market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/q1-catastrophes-may-hit-earnings-won-t-change-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19422837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/q1-catastrophes-may-hit-earnings-won-t-change-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chile earthquake</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>earthquakes</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance companies</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>marsh and mclennan</category><category>MMC</category><category>Reinsurance</category><category>reinsurance industry</category><category>Willis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reinsurance Rates Fall Around the World]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/reinsurance-rates-fall-around-the-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/reinsurance-rates-fall-around-the-world/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/reinsurance-rates-fall-around-the-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/marsh-mclennan-logo.jpg" />The first quarter <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/catastrophes/">catastrophes</a> weren't enough to push property-catastrophe <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/reinsurance/">reinsurance</a> rates lower. Even though the first quarter was a busy one for catastrophe losses, particularly for global reinsurers, they weren't sufficient to change the market. As a result, the four regions renewing at April 1, 2010 -- the United States, Japan, Latin America and South Korea -- ranged from soft to controlled, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gccapitalideas.com/2010/04/01/april-1-reinsurance-renewals-rates-lower-returns-under-pressure/">according to the latest from Guy Carpenter</a>, the reinsurance arm of Marsh &amp; McLennan (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/marsh-and-mclennan-companies-inc/mmc/nys">MMC</a>). This comes as no surprise, as indications throughout the run-up to the renewal pointed to an orderly process in which there would be <a target="_blank" href="http://reinsuranceblogger.blogspot.com/2010/03/reinsurance-rates-talk-continues.html">enough capital to support the market's needs</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/reinsurance-rates-fall-around-the-world/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reinsurance Rates Fall Around the World</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/reinsurance-rates-fall-around-the-world/">Reinsurance Rates Fall Around the World</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/reinsurance-rates-fall-around-the-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19422800/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/reinsurance-rates-fall-around-the-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>catastrophe</category><category>catastrophe insurance</category><category>catastrophes</category><category>chile earthquake</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>earthquakes</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>marsh and mclennan</category><category>MMC</category><category>Reinsurance</category><category>reinsurance industry</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q1 Cats Likely to Have Reinsurance Earnings Impact]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/q1-cats-likely-to-have-reinsurance-earnings-impact/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/q1-cats-likely-to-have-reinsurance-earnings-impact/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/q1-cats-likely-to-have-reinsurance-earnings-impact/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/chileflag.jpg" />After weeks of speculation, the financial damage from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Chileearthquake/">Chile earthquake</a> and Windstorm Xynthia in Europe is starting to emerge. <a href="http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100319/NEWS/100319897" target="_blank">According to a recent report by Moody's</a>, 16 global <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/reinsurance/">reinsurance</a> companies have reported their net insured losses (before taxes) from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/catastrophe/">catastrophe</a> event, and the damage has already reached $3.5 billion, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/15/assessing-the-tab-for-q1-catastrophes/" target="_blank">increasing an already high tally</a>. The firm expects these events to have a noticeable impact on first quarter results for the industry.</p>
<p>According to the report, the first quarter of 2010's results "will have many moving pieces, including the possibility of favorable loss reserve development." It continues, though, that "we would expect a number of reinsurers to post both operating and net losses for the quarter."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/q1-cats-likely-to-have-reinsurance-earnings-impact/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Q1 Cats Likely to Have Reinsurance Earnings Impact</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/q1-cats-likely-to-have-reinsurance-earnings-impact/">Q1 Cats Likely to Have Reinsurance Earnings Impact</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/q1-cats-likely-to-have-reinsurance-earnings-impact/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19407801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/q1-cats-likely-to-have-reinsurance-earnings-impact/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>catastrophe</category><category>catastrophe insurance</category><category>catastrophe planning</category><category>catastrophes</category><category>catastrophic insurance</category><category>Chile</category><category>chile earthquake</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>earthquakes</category><category>hurricane</category><category>Hurricanes</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance companies</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>moody</category><category>Moodys</category><category>Reinsurance</category><category>reinsurance industry</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[State Farm Planning Monster Cat Bond]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/state-farm-planning-monster-cat-bond/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/state-farm-planning-monster-cat-bond/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/state-farm-planning-monster-cat-bond/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/statefarm.jpg" />Merna Re, the largest <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/catastrophe/">catastrophe</a> bond of all time, is set to mature in June, and State Farm is already putting together its replacement, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100318/NEWS/100319903">the creatively named Merna Re II</a>. The successor, planned for issuance in April, is said to be for $400 million in risk capital, though investor demand could push it as high as $700 million. This still pales in comparison to the $1.2 billion that the original brought in the door.</p>
<p>If State Farm is able to stimulate demand for Merna Re II, which would protect the company from non-California <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/earthquake/">earthquake</a> risk in the U.S., it will be third cat bond to come to market in 2010, which is expected to be a strong year for this form of risk transfer. The cat bond market fell silent after the near-collapse of American International Group (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) in September 2008 but was still the third busiest in terms of capital issued in the history of the cat bond market. Heading into 2009, prospects for the cat bond space seemed uncertain, but a robust fourth quarter eventually resulted in a year-over-year increase, driven mostly by repeat issuers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/state-farm-planning-monster-cat-bond/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>State Farm Planning Monster Cat Bond</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/state-farm-planning-monster-cat-bond/">State Farm Planning Monster Cat Bond</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/state-farm-planning-monster-cat-bond/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/state-farm-planning-monster-cat-bond/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>california</category><category>catastrophe</category><category>catastrophe insurance</category><category>catastrophe planning</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>featured</category><category>Hartford</category><category>hartford financial</category><category>Hartford Financial Services</category><category>Hurricanes</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance companies</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>insurance stocks</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Reinsurance</category><category>reinsurance industry</category><category>risk management</category><category>state farm</category><category>SWCEY</category><category>swiss re</category><category>Swiss Reinsurance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[No Surprise: Chile Leads to Reinsurance Rate Increase Debate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/10/no-surprise-chile-leads-to-reinsurance-rate-increase-debate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/10/no-surprise-chile-leads-to-reinsurance-rate-increase-debate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/10/no-surprise-chile-leads-to-reinsurance-rate-increase-debate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/chileflag.jpg" alt="" />It was only a matter of time. Where there are catastrophe losses, there is talk of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/reinsurance/">reinsurance</a> rate increases. <br /> <br /> In light of the high catastrophe losses from the Chilean <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/earthquake/">earthquake</a>, which could reach $8 billion, reinsurers are now signaling that they may try to raise rates at the next renewal. QBE Insurance (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/qbe-insurance-group-ltd/qbeif/nao" target="_blank">QBEIF</a>) believes that <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/reinsurers-to-put-pressure-on-premiums-20100309-pvvv.html" target="_blank">rate increases may be necessary</a>, as reinsurers try to recapture capital depleted by quake-related payouts. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/10/no-surprise-chile-leads-to-reinsurance-rate-increase-debate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>No Surprise: Chile Leads to Reinsurance Rate Increase Debate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/10/no-surprise-chile-leads-to-reinsurance-rate-increase-debate/">No Surprise: Chile Leads to Reinsurance Rate Increase Debate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.smh.com.au/business/reinsurers-to-put-pressure-on-premiums-20100309-pvvv.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/10/no-surprise-chile-leads-to-reinsurance-rate-increase-debate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19391258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/10/no-surprise-chile-leads-to-reinsurance-rate-increase-debate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aon</category><category>AonCorp</category><category>AonCorp.</category><category>AonCorporation</category><category>Chile</category><category>chile earthquake</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>earthquakes</category><category>insurance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Reinsurance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cat Bond Impact from Chile Unlikely, but Future to Change]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/08/cat-bond-impact-from-chile-unlikely-but-future-to-change/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/08/cat-bond-impact-from-chile-unlikely-but-future-to-change/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/08/cat-bond-impact-from-chile-unlikely-but-future-to-change/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/chileflag.jpg" alt="" />Despite the magnitude of the recent earthquake in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Chile/">Chile</a> - in both physical and financial terms - it's unlikely to trigger a catastrophe bond payout. Catastrophe modeling firms AIR Worldwide and EQECAT offer <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/chile-quake-losses-to-top-2-billion/">a range of estimated insured losses of $2 billion to $8 billion</a>, though the dust is still settling. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.artemis.bm/blog/2010/03/04/chile-quake-to-be-hugely-costly-but-no-risk-to-cat-bonds/">According to insurance securitization blog Artemis.bm</a>, "A similar quake in the right area of the U.S. or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Japan/">Japan</a> would most certainly have triggered a cat bond."<p>
Though there has been cat bond activity in Latin America, none have been issued in the region to cover earthquake risk. Low rates of insurance penetration are likely to keep what will already be a costly situation for insurers and reinsurers from being even worse -- i.e., because not much coverage has been written in Chile.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/08/cat-bond-impact-from-chile-unlikely-but-future-to-change/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cat Bond Impact from Chile Unlikely, but Future to Change</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/08/cat-bond-impact-from-chile-unlikely-but-future-to-change/">Cat Bond Impact from Chile Unlikely, but Future to Change</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.artemis.bm/blog/2010/03/04/chile-quake-to-be-hugely-costly-but-no-risk-to-cat-bonds/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/08/cat-bond-impact-from-chile-unlikely-but-future-to-change/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19387521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/08/cat-bond-impact-from-chile-unlikely-but-future-to-change/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>catastrophe insurance</category><category>catastrophe planning</category><category>Chile</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Reinsurance</category><category>risk</category><category>risk management</category><category>RiskManagement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chile Quake Losses to Top $2 Billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/chile-quake-losses-to-top-2-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/chile-quake-losses-to-top-2-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/chile-quake-losses-to-top-2-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/chileflag.jpg" />Insured losses from the magnitude 8.8 earthquake in Chile will only account for a small fraction of total economic losses. According to catastrophe modeling firm <a target="_blank" href="http://www.air-worldwide.com/">AIR Worldwide</a>, insured losses will probably cross the $2 billion threshold, while total economic losses could exceed $15 million. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.eqecat.com/">EQECAT</a>, another cat modeling firm, released a preliminary economic loss estimate of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/chilean-earthquake-decimates-more-than-10-of-its-gdp/">$10 million to $15 million</a>.</p>
<p>The area affected by the earthquake, AIR says, has residential and commercial properties with an aggregate insured value of approximately $275 million. Residential insurance penetration could be as low as 10%, while the commercial insurance sector has far higher penetration, reported to be approximately 60%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/chile-quake-losses-to-top-2-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chile Quake Losses to Top $2 Billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/chile-quake-losses-to-top-2-billion/">Chile Quake Losses to Top $2 Billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.globalreinsurance.com/story.asp?sectioncode=5&amp;storycode=383084&amp;c=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/chile-quake-losses-to-top-2-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19379327/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/chile-quake-losses-to-top-2-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>air</category><category>catastrophe</category><category>catastrophe insurance</category><category>catastrophes</category><category>Chile</category><category>earthquake</category><category>earthquake insurance</category><category>insurance</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should U.S., Like IMF, Extend Interest-Free Loan to Haiti?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/should-u-s-like-imf-extend-interest-free-loan-to-haiti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/should-u-s-like-imf-extend-interest-free-loan-to-haiti/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/should-u-s-like-imf-extend-interest-free-loan-to-haiti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/imf-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />The International Monetary Fund has offered $100 million in the form of <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2010/NEW012010A.htm">an interest-free loan,</a> as part of its immediate aid response to earthquake-ravaged Haiti. <br />
<br />
Further, because the action will speed Haiti's recovery, the calculation here argues that the United States should do the same thing. The IMF has also called for a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_plan">Marshall Plan</a> to rebuild Haiti.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/should-u-s-like-imf-extend-interest-free-loan-to-haiti/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should U.S., Like IMF, Extend Interest-Free Loan to Haiti?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/should-u-s-like-imf-extend-interest-free-loan-to-haiti/">Should U.S., Like IMF, Extend Interest-Free Loan to Haiti?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/should-u-s-like-imf-extend-interest-free-loan-to-haiti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19328004/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/should-u-s-like-imf-extend-interest-free-loan-to-haiti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earthquake</category><category>Haiti</category><category>Haiti relief</category><category>IMF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Corning (GLW) LCD production slowed by earthquake]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/corning-glw-lcd-production-slowed-by-earthquake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/corning-glw-lcd-production-slowed-by-earthquake/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/corning-glw-lcd-production-slowed-by-earthquake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/glw/" rel="tag">Corning Inc (GLW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><a href="http://www.corning.com/investor_relations/index.aspx" target="_blank"><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="GLW logo" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/glw-corning-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/corning-incorporated/glw/nys">Corning</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/corning-incorporated/glw/nys">GLW</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/corning-incorporated/glw/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is falling today after the company said that an earthquake in Honshu yesterday <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/ap/quake-disrupts-corning-glass-plant-in-japan/rfid240543924?channel=pf" target="_blank">disrupted production at its LCD glass manufacturing facility</a> in Shizuoka, Japan. GLW expects the earthquake to reduce third-quarter revenue by up to $65 million. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on GLW.</p>
<p>This morning, GLW opened at $16.08. So far today the stock has hit a low of $15.80 and a high of $16.15. As of 11:25, GLW is trading at $15.94, down $0.44 (-2.7%). The chart for GLW looks neutral and <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives GLW a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/corning-glw-lcd-production-slowed-by-earthquake/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Corning (GLW) LCD production slowed by earthquake</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/corning-glw-lcd-production-slowed-by-earthquake/">Corning (GLW) LCD production slowed by earthquake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/corning-glw-lcd-production-slowed-by-earthquake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19125768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/corning-glw-lcd-production-slowed-by-earthquake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Corning</category><category>earthquake</category><category>GLW</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>Japan</category><category>LCD</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Little impact seen for Intel (INTC) from Chinese quake]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/little-impact-seen-for-intel-intc-from-chinese-quake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/little-impact-seen-for-intel-intc-from-chinese-quake/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/little-impact-seen-for-intel-intc-from-chinese-quake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amat/" rel="tag">Applied Materials (AMAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://www.intc.com/phoenix.zhtml?iid=ftr+invrel&amp;c=101302&amp;p=irol-IRHome" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/intc-intel-logo.jpg" alt="INTC logo" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) shares are trading higher today in light of <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/may2008/gb20080513_010867.htm" target="_blank">a BusinessWeek article that downplayed the economic impact of the recent Chinese earthquake on companies with outposts in that part of China</a>, a list which includes Intel. Not hurting INTC today is <a href="http://www.nasdaq.com//aspxcontent/newsstory.aspx?textpath=20080514%5CACQDJON200805141124DOWJONESDJONLINE000651.htm&amp;cdtime=05%2f14%2f2008%2011%3a24AM" target="_blank">a weak earnings outlook</a> from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/applied-materials-inc/amat/nas">Applied Materials (NASDAQ: AMAT</a>), which is often seen as a bellweather for technology companies. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on INTC.
<p>After hitting a one-year high of $27.99 in December, the stock hit a one-year low of $18.05 in January. INTC opened this morning at $23.85. So far today the stock has hit a low of $23.76 and a high of $24.29. As of 12:15, INTC is trading at $24.16, up $0.40 (1.7%). The chart for INTC looks bullish and deteriorating slightly, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 Stars (out of 5) hold rating.  </p>
<p>For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a July <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $21 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 6.7% return in just two months as long as INTC is above $21 at July expiration. Intel would have to fall by more than 13% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/little-impact-seen-for-intel-intc-from-chinese-quake/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Little impact seen for Intel (INTC) from Chinese quake</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/little-impact-seen-for-intel-intc-from-chinese-quake/">Little impact seen for Intel (INTC) from Chinese quake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 May 2008 14:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/little-impact-seen-for-intel-intc-from-chinese-quake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1195389/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/little-impact-seen-for-intel-intc-from-chinese-quake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMAT</category><category>China</category><category>earthquake</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>optiions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:51:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
