<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's Global Same-Store Sales Increase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/mcdonalds-global-same-store-sales-increase/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/mcdonalds-global-same-store-sales-increase/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/mcdonalds-global-same-store-sales-increase/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/mcd-logo-240x160.jpg" />McDonald's (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) said that its global <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/mcdonald-s-november-global-comparable-sales-rise-4-8percent/rfid394086161/?channel=pf">comparable sales increased by 4.8% during November</a>. "McDonald's continued strong performance reflects the benefits of our  global alignment around the Plan to Win," said CEO <span class="xn-person">Jim Skinner</span>. <br />
<br />
In the U.S., MCD's same-store sales increased 4.9%. The company attributes this performance to strong demand for McCafe beverages and the return of the "iconic" McRib sandwich (yuck). <br />
<br />
Overseas sales in Europe increased 4.9% on strong performance in France, Germany, Russia, and the U.K. The focus on McWraps in Germany and four-tiered menu pricing paid off. In the Asia/Pacific, Middle East, and Africa market, sales increased 2.4% as strong performance in Australia and China offset poor performance in Japan. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/mcdonalds-global-same-store-sales-increase/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McDonald's Global Same-Store Sales Increase</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/mcdonalds-global-same-store-sales-increase/">McDonald's Global Same-Store Sales Increase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/mcdonalds-global-same-store-sales-increase/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19751556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/mcdonalds-global-same-store-sales-increase/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>fast food</category><category>food</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>Technical Analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment Data Is Disturbing, Underemployment Numbers Are Staggering]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />This morning, my colleague Connie Madon reported that initial jobless claims showed a <a target="_blank" href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/02/news/economy/initial_claims/">disappointing gain of just 39,000 jobs</a> and an unemployment rate at a seven-month high of 9.8%. Remember that the Street expected job growth of 144,000. This disappointing data has helped push the Dow Jones as we head through the lunch hour. I wanted to take a look at a couple tidbits of news from the report, one that I find especially disturbing.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment Data Is Disturbing, Underemployment Numbers Are Staggering</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/">Unemployment Data Is Disturbing, Underemployment Numbers Are Staggering</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19745532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>financial recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>underemployment</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Holiday Shopping Changing? Walmart and Target Think So]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/is-holiday-shopping-changing-walmart-and-target-think-so/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/is-holiday-shopping-changing-walmart-and-target-think-so/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/is-holiday-shopping-changing-walmart-and-target-think-so/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/05/toyrus240.jpg" alt="toy shopping" />I was reading a rather interesting article in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704405704575596920008896164.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required) about the potential for a holiday toy war between Target (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys" target="_blank">TGT</a>) and Walmart (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys" target="_blank">WMT</a>). The price war centers on toys because "parents will buy stuff for their kids even when the economy is awful."</p>
<p>The article adds that shoppers have attempted to buy the "biggest toy bargains" while "ignor[ing] stores' other offerings." However, the article is quick to point out improving economic conditions suggest that retailers have a reason to believe the shoppers will look around the store a bit more and be quicker to part with some cash. Is this a safe assumption? Yes, I think that it is. However, I have a couple of reservations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/is-holiday-shopping-changing-walmart-and-target-think-so/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Holiday Shopping Changing? Walmart and Target Think So</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/is-holiday-shopping-changing-walmart-and-target-think-so/">Is Holiday Shopping Changing? Walmart and Target Think So</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/is-holiday-shopping-changing-walmart-and-target-think-so/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19709067/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/09/is-holiday-shopping-changing-walmart-and-target-think-so/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>featured</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>inthenews</category><category>online shopping</category><category>retail</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>Walmart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Harley-Davidson Sales Forecast Disappoints the Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/harley-davidson-sales-forecast-disappoints/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/harley-davidson-sales-forecast-disappoints/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/harley-davidson-sales-forecast-disappoints/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/harley-davidson-detail.jpg" alt="Harley-Davidson (HOG)" />I guess you could say that shareholders of Harley-Davidson (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/harley-davidson-inc/hog/nys">HOG</a>) aren't in hog heaven. The motorcycle magnate announced solid <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/harley-davidson-3q-income-climbs-as/574367/">third-quarter earnings</a> results, but it disappointed the Street with its motorcycle sales.</p>
<p>Let's start with the good news. Harley-Davidson reported third-quarter net income of 38 cents per share ($88.8 million) or 40 cents per continuing share, far better than last year's same-quarter earnings of 11 cents per share. What's more, these results topped the consensus estimate of 35 cents per share. The company was even able to overcome poor quarterly sales because of it financial services division and cost-cutting efforts.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/harley-davidson-sales-forecast-disappoints/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Harley-Davidson Sales Forecast Disappoints the Street</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/harley-davidson-sales-forecast-disappoints/">Harley-Davidson Sales Forecast Disappoints the Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/harley-davidson-sales-forecast-disappoints/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19679940/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/harley-davidson-sales-forecast-disappoints/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>harley</category><category>Harley-Davidson</category><category>Harley-Davidson earnings</category><category>HOG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>motorcycle</category><category>motorcycle sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IMF: Global Financial System Hinders Economic Recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/imf-logo-240.jpg" alt="IMF" />According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the global financial system may be the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/financial-system-is-economys-achilles-heel-imf-2010-10-05">biggest hindrance to a worldwide economic recovery</a>. The IMF used its global financial stability report to make this announcement, one that suggests there isn't a lot of stability thanks mainly to the global financial system.</p>
<p>The IMF estimated that the writedowns attributed to the credit crisis were $2.2 trillion, lower than the $2.3 trillion originally projected in April.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IMF: Global Financial System Hinders Economic Recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/">IMF: Global Financial System Hinders Economic Recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19661168/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>IMF</category><category>International Monetary Fund</category><category>inthenews</category><category>world economic forum</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GDP for Second Quarter Revised Lower, Down to 1.6%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/gdp-for-second-quarter-revised-lower-down-to-1-6/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/gdp-for-second-quarter-revised-lower-down-to-1-6/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/gdp-for-second-quarter-revised-lower-down-to-1-6/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/commercedept.jpg"  alt="" />This morning, the Commerce Department announced that the economy <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/economic-growth-slows-to-1-6-pace/19610744/">grew at a slower pace</a> than previously thought in the April-to-June period. The gross domestic product grew at a 1.6% rate during the period, revised down from an initial estimate of 2.4%, and far slower than the 3.7% pace in the first quarter. Yet Wall Street actually sighed in relief because investors and economists had expected an even worse number.</p>
<p>Despite the euphoria on the Street over the not-as-bad-as-expected numbers, we are still faced with a stark reality as the economy has lost "significant momentum" lately. In fact, most believe that the third quarter will hold similarly weak growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/gdp-for-second-quarter-revised-lower-down-to-1-6/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GDP for Second Quarter Revised Lower, Down to 1.6%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/gdp-for-second-quarter-revised-lower-down-to-1-6/">GDP for Second Quarter Revised Lower, Down to 1.6%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/gdp-for-second-quarter-revised-lower-down-to-1-6/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19610773/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/27/gdp-for-second-quarter-revised-lower-down-to-1-6/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic growth</category><category>economy</category><category>GDP</category><category>gross domestic product</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobless Claims Increase by 37,000]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/jobless-claims-increase-by-37-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/jobless-claims-increase-by-37-000/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/jobless-claims-increase-by-37-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />The unmber of initial state unemployment benefits <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jobless-claims-jump-37000-to-464000-2010-07-22" target="_blank">increased</a> by 37,000 to 464,000 during the past week, the Labor Department reported Thursday. This was above economist expectations for initial claims of 450,000. The four-week average of initial claims also increased, up 1,250 to 456,000. The four-week moving average is considered a better indicator because it shows the overall trend rather than the action in the past week. <br />
<br />
Continuing claims dropped by 223,000 to 4.49 million during the past week. Experts attribute the volatility in the number of continuing claims to seasonal adjustment issues. The four-week average of continuing claims also dropped by 21,500 to 4.57 million. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/jobless-claims-increase-by-37-000/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobless Claims Increase by 37,000</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/jobless-claims-increase-by-37-000/">Jobless Claims Increase by 37,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/jobless-claims-increase-by-37-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19564279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/22/jobless-claims-increase-by-37-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>initial jobless claims</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>jobs</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retail Sales Slip During June]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/retail-sales-slip-during-june/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/retail-sales-slip-during-june/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/retail-sales-slip-during-june/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/target-shoppers-240x160.jpg" />U.S. retail sales <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/taxes/retail-sales-declined-0-5-in-june-commerce-dept-says/19553668/" target="_blank">dropped 0.5% during June</a> to a seasonally adjusted $360.2 billion, the Commerce Department announced Wednesday. This data is seen as evidence that the American economy has slowed further. Sales fell for the second month in a row. <br />
<br />
The good news is that sales were 4.8% higher when compared to June 2009, and that for the first half of 2010, retail sales were 6.5% higher compared to last year. The decline was somewhat expected following retailers sales reports for  the month. Economists had <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-retail-sales-fall-05-in-june-2010-07-14-83000">expected  a drop of 0.4%</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/retail-sales-slip-during-june/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail Sales Slip During June</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/retail-sales-slip-during-june/">Retail Sales Slip During June</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/retail-sales-slip-during-june/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19553702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/14/retail-sales-slip-during-june/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic data</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail</category><category>retail data</category><category>retail sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Prices Fall for a Second-Straight Month]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/CPI-falls-for-a-second-straight-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/CPI-falls-for-a-second-straight-month/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/CPI-falls-for-a-second-straight-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/us-dollarnote-240.jpg" />The Labor Department announced Thursday morning that U.S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/consumer-prices-dip-for-second-straight/956511/">consumer prices dropped 0.2% in May</a>. May was the second-straight month in which prices dropped, as prices fell 0.1% during April as well. The price drop was precipitated by a 2.9% drop in energy prices, a result of lower gasoline prices.</p>
<p>Although energy prices dropped, the core CPI, which excludes food and energy prices, increased 0.1%. This slight increase was only the second monthly increase this year, and it matched the consensus estimate.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/CPI-falls-for-a-second-straight-month/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Prices Fall for a Second-Straight Month</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/CPI-falls-for-a-second-straight-month/">Consumer Prices Fall for a Second-Straight Month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/CPI-falls-for-a-second-straight-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19520044/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/17/CPI-falls-for-a-second-straight-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>cpi</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic data</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Jobless Claims Increase to a Month-Long High]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/u-s-jobless-claims-increase-to-a-month-long-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/u-s-jobless-claims-increase-to-a-month-long-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/u-s-jobless-claims-increase-to-a-month-long-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="unemployment" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />The Labor Department issued a bit of a nasty surprise this morning in its report on initial jobless claims. Last week, the department issued <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-jobless-claims-climb-25000-to-471000-2010-05-20" target="_blank">25,000 new claims for unemployment benefits</a>, far more than the expected drop of 6,000 claims. The resulting 471,000 total claims in the past week was the most in a month.</p>
<p>In addition, the four-week average of initial claims, which many see as a better gauge of employment because it smooths out the volatile weekly numbers -- increased. According to the Labor Department, there were no unusual factors contributing to the release.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/u-s-jobless-claims-increase-to-a-month-long-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Jobless Claims Increase to a Month-Long High</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/u-s-jobless-claims-increase-to-a-month-long-high/">U.S. Jobless Claims Increase to a Month-Long High</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 May 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/u-s-jobless-claims-increase-to-a-month-long-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19484789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/20/u-s-jobless-claims-increase-to-a-month-long-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>jobs</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Prices Slip During April]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/us-dollarnote-240.jpg" />The Labor Department's recently released April consumer inflation figures may cast a bit of a bearish shadow on the Street. Consumer <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-consumer-prices-fall-01-in-april-2010-05-19">prices dropped</a> 0.1% last month, on a seasonally adjusted basis. This is the first decline in the consumer price index since March 2009. The impetus for the drop was a decline in energy, housing, auto and apparel prices. <br />
<br />
That said, the consumer price index has increased 2.2% in the past year. What's more, the core CPI, which excludes the volatile food and energy prices, was unchanged, pushing the year-over-year increase in core inflation lower to 0.9%. This benchmark is at its lowest since January 1966.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Prices Slip During April</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/">Consumer Prices Slip During April</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 May 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19483129/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/consumer-prices-slip-during-april/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer</category><category>consumer data</category><category>consumer price index</category><category>CPI</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Weekly Jobless Claims Fall]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/weekly-jobless-claims-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/weekly-jobless-claims-fall/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/weekly-jobless-claims-fall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" alt="" />The Labor Department announced Thursday that the number of people applying for unemployment benefits remained <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/weekly-jobless-claims-little-changed-at-444000-2010-05-13">virtually unchanged from last week's 444,000 claims</a>. In the most recent week, the number of jobless claims dropped by 4,000, but the data from a week earlier was revised up by 4,000. <br />
<br />
The data came in higher than expected, as some experts called for a drop to 440,000 claims in the past week. In the wake of this data, Treasurys and the dollar have increased, while some of the morning's momentum was tempered.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/weekly-jobless-claims-fall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Weekly Jobless Claims Fall</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/weekly-jobless-claims-fall/">Weekly Jobless Claims Fall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 May 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/weekly-jobless-claims-fall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19475798/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/weekly-jobless-claims-fall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment claims</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Commodities Weren't a Safe Haven on May 6, 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/commodities-may-6-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/commodities-may-6-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/commodities-may-6-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="Dow chart May 7 2010" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/05/downicemay7240.jpg" />I don't know if any one out there can say he or she saw yesterday's plunge coming. Was the plummet based solely on a <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/did-a-citigroup-traders-error-add-to-market-collapse/19467905/">fat-fingered typing mistake</a>? Was it based solely on concerns over the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2010/05/06/dow-drops-nearly-1-000-points-before-paring-loss/19467411/">health of the Greek economy</a>? Was it caused by rumors that Germany may pull out of the eurozone? I don't know if we will be able to specify one problem, but one thing is sure in the wake of yesterday's drop -- fear is as prominent as ever on the Street.</p>
<p>On down days in the markets, one generally expects to see a rally in commodities, as they are often deemed a safe haven for investors. This wasn't the case yesterday as crude oil saw its three-day sell off extend itself to a 3.6% loss, bringing the closing price of black gold to $77.11 per barrel (crude is on pace to set its worst week since 2009).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/commodities-may-6-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Commodities Weren't a Safe Haven on May 6, 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/commodities-may-6-2010/">Commodities Weren't a Safe Haven on May 6, 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/commodities-may-6-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19468539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/commodities-may-6-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crude</category><category>crude oil</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economy</category><category>gold</category><category>inthenews</category><category>May 6 Stock Market Plunge</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Do Earnings from the Big Banks Signal for the Economy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/what-do-earnings-from-the-big-banks-signal-for-the-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/what-do-earnings-from-the-big-banks-signal-for-the-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/what-do-earnings-from-the-big-banks-signal-for-the-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/piggy-bank.jpg"  alt="" />Banks have seen a hectic couple of days' of trading, thanks to a bevy of news. I thought it may be good to take a look at some earnings results from a few of the banks, and what it could mean for the economy going forward. <br />
<br />
First, let's look at the earnings:<br />
<ul>
    <li>JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys" target="_blank">JPM</a>): earnings of 74 cents per share; expectations for 60 cents per share</li>
    <li>Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys" target="_blank">C</a>): a loss of six cents per share; expectations for a loss of 33 cents per share</li>
    <li>Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys" target="_blank">GS</a>): earnings of $8.20 per share; expectations for earnings of $5.20</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/what-do-earnings-from-the-big-banks-signal-for-the-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What Do Earnings from the Big Banks Signal for the Economy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/what-do-earnings-from-the-big-banks-signal-for-the-economy/">What Do Earnings from the Big Banks Signal for the Economy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/what-do-earnings-from-the-big-banks-signal-for-the-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19327477/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/22/what-do-earnings-from-the-big-banks-signal-for-the-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>bank earnings</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>big banks</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>earnings</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MS</category><category>Northern Trust</category><category>NTRS</category><category>State Street</category><category>StateStreet</category><category>STT</category><category>U.S. Bancorp</category><category>U.s.Bancorp</category><category>USB</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke: Weak Regulation Caused Economic Crisis]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/ben-bernanke-weak-regulation-caused-economic-crisis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/ben-bernanke-weak-regulation-caused-economic-crisis/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/ben-bernanke-weak-regulation-caused-economic-crisis/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/ben-bernanke.jpg" alt="" />Big Ben Bernanke is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/04/business/economy/04fed.html" target="_blank">letting his opinions be known early in 2010</a>, and he is pointing the finger of blame for the economic crisis right at weak regulation. Bernanke is waiting for confirmation of his second term as Fed chair and he is looking for greater regulatory authority from Congress. </p>
<p>Bernanke told the American Economic Association that "Stronger regulation and supervision aimed at problems with underwriting practices and lenders' risk management would have been a more effective and surgical approach to constraining the housing bubble than a general increase in interest rates." This statement was part of Bernanke's response to accusations that the Fed was a major contributor to the financial crisis. The Fed head believes that the interest rates set by the Federal Reserve from 2002 to 2006 were appropriate.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/ben-bernanke-weak-regulation-caused-economic-crisis/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ben Bernanke: Weak Regulation Caused Economic Crisis</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/ben-bernanke-weak-regulation-caused-economic-crisis/">Ben Bernanke: Weak Regulation Caused Economic Crisis</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/ben-bernanke-weak-regulation-caused-economic-crisis/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19301608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/ben-bernanke-weak-regulation-caused-economic-crisis/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>Fed</category><category>Fed Chairman</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Dubai Vaporizes $48 Trillion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="183" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="257" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/dubai_tower.jpg" alt="" />Best wishes to all and, next to world peace among people, we should hope for the same among world markets.</p>
<p>I have let some time pass before commenting on a recent example <font size="+0"><font size="2" face="Arial" color="#000000" id="role_document">of</font></font> how fragile a world we live in. This past year through a time of greater economic danger, fear and volatility than most of us has experienced in a life time, many people cannot fathom how close we came to the edge of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hades">Hades</a>.</p>
<p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Dubai Vaporizes $48 Trillion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/">Serious Money: Dubai Vaporizes $48 Trillion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19281056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/serious-money-dubai-vaporizes-48-trillion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>BankingSector</category><category>burj dubai</category><category>BurjDubai</category><category>dubai world</category><category>DubaiWorld</category><category>econmic valuation</category><category>EconmicValuation</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>EconomicStimulus</category><category>Global Stock Markets</category><category>GlobalStockMarkets</category><category>inthenewas</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Citi preparing to repay TARP?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/citigroup-logo-200x150.gif" />Reports are surfacing that Citigroup (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) may be gearing up to pay back some for the $45 billion it received from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). According to CNBC, Citi is going to <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/34350090">raise as much as $20 billion</a> through a stock offering as part of these plans. The report notes that Citi's CEO Vikram Pandit has changes his travel plans so he can announce an equity offering today. <br /><br />Furthermore, Citi chairman Dick Parsons indicated to CNBC that the bank "is in a position to repay the TARP money, but there is an active discussion we have to have with regulators." An earlier report hinted that Citi and government regulators disagreed over how much C should raise to taxpayers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Citi preparing to repay TARP?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/">Is Citi preparing to repay TARP?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19273168/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/is-citi-preparing-to-repay-tarp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>featured</category><category>TARP</category><category>TARP repayment</category><category>TarpRepayment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is there a chink in McDonald's armor?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/is-there-a-chink-in-mcdonalds-armor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/is-there-a-chink-in-mcdonalds-armor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/is-there-a-chink-in-mcdonalds-armor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/mcdonaldstjb_200.jpg" />On Tuesday, McDonald's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) announced that <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/mcdonalds-same-store-sales-rise-07-2009-12-08" target="_blank">November same-store sales increased 0.7%</a>. Great news, right? Well, the fast-food pioneer's sales dropped 0.6% in America, but increased 2.5% in Europe. MCD blames the drop in the United States on the sluggish economy, although the house of Ronald managed to outperform a majority of its American competitors.</p>
<p>Here is my question, hasn't the economic situation gotten better in America? Why would McDonald's sales suddenly slump just as it seems the economy is in recovery mode? Are we as Americans now more accustomed to eating at home thanks to tightening purse strings? Now that the economy is recovering, do we have a taste for better fast-food options? Are we finally tired of McDonald's?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/is-there-a-chink-in-mcdonalds-armor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is there a chink in McDonald's armor?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/is-there-a-chink-in-mcdonalds-armor/">Is there a chink in McDonald's armor?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/is-there-a-chink-in-mcdonalds-armor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19271564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/is-there-a-chink-in-mcdonalds-armor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>fast food</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>same-store sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment falls during November -- stocks to rally]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" height="200" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/labor.jpg" alt="" />It looks like we may have a bit of a rally on this final trading day of the first week of December thanks to the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jobless-rate-falls-to-10-as-job-losses-shrink-2009-12-04">nonfarm payroll report</a>. During November, 11,000 jobs were shed, far fewer than the expected 100,000 and the fewest lost jobs since December 2007. And the unemployment rate dropped to 10%.<br /><br />There is a word of caution, as some economists believe that November's payroll figures could appear better because of the way the government adjusts the data for seasonal factors. That's the only wet blanket I will throw on this news, as the "seasonal factor issue" does not impact the jobless rate.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment falls during November -- stocks to rally</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/">Unemployment falls during November -- stocks to rally</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19265395/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/unemployment-falls-during-november-stocks-to-rally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>jobs</category><category>nonfarm payrolls</category><category>NonfarmPayrolls</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dollar Tree posts strong third-quarter earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/dollartreelogo.jpg" />Discount retailer Dollar Tree (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dollar-tree-inc/dltr/nas">DLTR</a>), which sells everything for a dollar or less, reported third-quarter earnings Tuesday morning. The company earned <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/dollar-tree-inc-reports-record-third-quarter-results/rfid273928162?channel=pf">76 cents per share during the quarter</a>, nearly 62% higher than last year's same-quarter earnings. Sales for the quarter increased by more than 12% to $1.25 billion from $1.11 billion in sales from last year. <br /><br />Dollar Tree beat the <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Earnings/Dollar+Tree+%28DLTR%29+Posts+Q3+EPS+of+%24.76%2C+Beats+Views+by+10c/5136273.html">Street's earnings expectation</a> of 66 cents per share by a dime and topped and revenue expectations of $1.24 billion. "I am pleased with our third quarter performance," said CEO Bob Sasser in a statment. "Sales and earnings were above plan."  Solid earnings from a company specializing in cheap prices during a recession -- is anyone really surprised?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dollar Tree posts strong third-quarter earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/">Dollar Tree posts strong third-quarter earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19252174/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/dollar-tree-posts-strong-third-quarter-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>discount retailers</category><category>DiscountRetailers</category><category>DLTR</category><category>Dollar Tree</category><category>DollarTree</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
