<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of Light: March's Jobs Gain Is More Evidence of Healing Labor Market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/03/march-jobs-gain-is-more-evidence-of-healing-labor-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/03/march-jobs-gain-is-more-evidence-of-healing-labor-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/03/march-jobs-gain-is-more-evidence-of-healing-labor-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/unemployment.jpg" alt="job growth" />This past week's data point of significance for investors has to be March's job report, which indicated the U.S. economy created a better-than-expected <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">216,000 jobs</a>, the U.S. Labor Department said.</p>
<p>Also, the U.S. unemployment rate dropped to 8.8% from 8.9%. A <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/economic-calendar/">Bloomberg survey</a> had expected the economy to create 200,000 jobs in March and the unemployment rate to remain unchanged at 8.9%. Further, job creation totals for February and January were revised higher: February to 194,000 from the initially estimated 192,000 gain; January to 68,000 from 63,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/03/march-jobs-gain-is-more-evidence-of-healing-labor-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of Light: March's Jobs Gain Is More Evidence of Healing Labor Market</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/03/march-jobs-gain-is-more-evidence-of-healing-labor-market/">Ray of Light: March's Jobs Gain Is More Evidence of Healing Labor Market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/03/march-jobs-gain-is-more-evidence-of-healing-labor-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19900866/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/03/march-jobs-gain-is-more-evidence-of-healing-labor-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job growth</category><category>jobs</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is IBM Headed to $200 and Beyond?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/iibm-stock-price-200/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/iibm-stock-price-200/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/iibm-stock-price-200/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/blue-ibm-240.gif" alt="" />The shares of International Business Machines (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>), which I first wrote about in February 2009 at a price of $91.51, have continued to move higher -- they appear to be trending toward $200 -- and, not surprisingly, I still like them. <br />
<br />
IBM's demonstrated business model should generate a 2011 revenue increase of 4% to 5% amid the global economic recovery, and a 5% to 7% revenue increase in 2012.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/iibm-stock-price-200/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is IBM Headed to $200 and Beyond?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/iibm-stock-price-200/">Is IBM Headed to $200 and Beyond?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/iibm-stock-price-200/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19897046/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/iibm-stock-price-200/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>big blue</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>IBM</category><category>IbmStockPrice</category><category>International Business Machines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Inadequate Q4 U.S. GDP Growth Points to Fed's Extension of QE2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/federal-reserve-bldg-1268425618.jpg"  alt="Federal Reserve" />This past week's data point of significance for investors has to be the revised, final, fourth quarter U.S. GDP report, which indicated the world's largest economy <a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm">grew 3.1%</a> in the quarter, as well as 2.9% for 2010. </p>
<p>In 2009, the U.S. economy contracted 2.6% during the Great Recession -- the worst downturn since the Great Depression -- and even though the final 3.1% fourth quarter stat was better than the 2.8% previously estimated fourth quarter growth rate, the growth pace still is not strong enough.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Inadequate Q4 U.S. GDP Growth Points to Fed's Extension of QE2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/">Inadequate Q4 U.S. GDP Growth Points to Fed's Extension of QE2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19892857/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic growth</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job creation</category><category>jobs</category><category>Q4 GDP</category><category>QE2</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of Light: U.S. Private Sector Hiring Increases]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="private sector hiring"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/rszbas009gettydailyfinance.jpg" />This past week's data point of significance for investors has to be the February nonfarm payroll report by the U.S. Department of Labor, which indicated that the U.S. economy created <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">192,000 jobs</a> last month -- roughly in-line with the consensus estimate.</p>
<p>The good news was complemented by the fact that January's job gain was revised up to 63,000 from 36,000 and December's to 152,000 from 121,000. January's low job tally was probably skewed lower by the winter blizzards and storms that hit the Northeast and Midwest; hence, it's safe to say that the economy is creating jobs. What it needs now is sustained demand to drive GDP growth, which will lead to stronger job growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of Light: U.S. Private Sector Hiring Increases</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/">Ray of Light: U.S. Private Sector Hiring Increases</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19869255/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/05/u-s-private-sector-hiring-increases/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job growth</category><category>jobs</category><category>John Maynard Keynes</category><category>Keynes</category><category>QE2</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of Light: Fed Sees Adequate U.S. GDP Growth for 2011-2013]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/26/fed-sees-adequate-u-s-gdp-growth-for-2011-2013/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/26/fed-sees-adequate-u-s-gdp-growth-for-2011-2013/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/26/fed-sees-adequate-u-s-gdp-growth-for-2011-2013/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/federalres240.jpg" alt="Federal Reserve" />The most recent datapoint of significance for investors has to be the U.S. Federal Reserve's <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcminutes20110126ep.htm">revised summary of economic projections</a>.</p>
<p>The Fed now sees a stronger U.S. economy in 2011, with the world's largest and most technologically advanced economy expected to grow 3.4% to 3.9%, up from the 3.0% to 3.6% November projection.</p>
<p>The Fed also expects the U.S. economy to grow 3.5% to 4.4% in 2012 and 3.7% to 4.6% in 2013, compared to the November estimates of 3.6% to 4.5% and 3.5% to 4.6%, respectively.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/26/fed-sees-adequate-u-s-gdp-growth-for-2011-2013/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of Light: Fed Sees Adequate U.S. GDP Growth for 2011-2013</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/26/fed-sees-adequate-u-s-gdp-growth-for-2011-2013/">Ray of Light: Fed Sees Adequate U.S. GDP Growth for 2011-2013</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/26/fed-sees-adequate-u-s-gdp-growth-for-2011-2013/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19860216/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/26/fed-sees-adequate-u-s-gdp-growth-for-2011-2013/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic growth</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>GDP forecast</category><category>inflation</category><category>inflation forecast</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>U.S. exports</category><category>U.S. GDP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kohl's: Retail Sector Survivor and Winner]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/kohl-s-retail-sector-survivor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/kohl-s-retail-sector-survivor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/kohl-s-retail-sector-survivor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kss/" rel="tag">Kohl's Corp (KSS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/02/kohlsstore.jpg"  alt="Kohl's (KSS) store" />Retailer Kohl's Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/kohl-s-corporation/kss/nys">KSS</a>) shares <a href="http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Symbol=kss">have retreated slightly</a> since hitting a high near $58, but just look on that dip as an opportunity to scoop up shares.</p>
<p>Kohl's is a retail sector winner amid the most challenging economic conditions for retailers in decades.</p>
<p>Kohl's same-store sales will likely increase about 5% to 6% in this year, FY2012, along with decent traffic. Kohl's also plans to open about 40 new stores. How many other retail chains are opening stores in a big way in 2011? Very few.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/kohl-s-retail-sector-survivor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kohl's: Retail Sector Survivor and Winner</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/kohl-s-retail-sector-survivor/">Kohl's: Retail Sector Survivor and Winner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/kohl-s-retail-sector-survivor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19852899/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/21/kohl-s-retail-sector-survivor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>Kohls</category><category>Kohls pullback</category><category>Kohls revenue forecast</category><category>Kohls same-store sales</category><category>KSS</category><category>retail sector</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tell-Tale Stat: Buffett's Berkshire Divests Bank of America, Nike Stakes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/19/buffetts-berkshire-divests-bank-of-america-nike/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/19/buffetts-berkshire-divests-bank-of-america-nike/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/19/buffetts-berkshire-divests-bank-of-america-nike/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Warren Buffett"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2011/02/buffett240.jpg" />The past week's data-point-of-consequence for investors had to be investment decisions by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>). </p>
<p>Buffett ended positions in several stocks in the fourth quarter, including the Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>), Nike (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>), Fiserv (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/fiserv-inc/fisv/nas">FISV</a>), Becton Dickinson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/becton-dickinson-and-company/bdx/nys">BDX</a>), Comcast Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>), Lowe's Co.s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">LOW</a>), Nalco (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nalco-holding-company/nlc/nys">NLC</a>) and Nestle (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nestle-s-a-s-adr/nsrgy/nao">NSRGY</a>), according to a filing, <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2011/02/15/warren-buffetts-berkshire-what-hes-been-buyingselling/"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported.</p>
<p>Berkshire added to a holding of only one stock in the fourth quarter: Wells Fargo (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-co-new/wfc/nys">WFC</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/19/buffetts-berkshire-divests-bank-of-america-nike/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tell-Tale Stat: Buffett's Berkshire Divests Bank of America, Nike Stakes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/19/buffetts-berkshire-divests-bank-of-america-nike/">Tell-Tale Stat: Buffett's Berkshire Divests Bank of America, Nike Stakes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/19/buffetts-berkshire-divests-bank-of-america-nike/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19851747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/19/buffetts-berkshire-divests-bank-of-america-nike/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BDX</category><category>Becton Dickinson</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>Buffett investing</category><category>Buffett stocks</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>Comcast</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>Fiserv</category><category>FISV</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LOW</category><category>Lowes</category><category>Nalco</category><category>Nestle</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><category>NLC</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: Ride the Recovery with These Three Stocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/29/comfort-zone-investing-ride-the-recovery-with-these-three-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/29/comfort-zone-investing-ride-the-recovery-with-these-three-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/29/comfort-zone-investing-ride-the-recovery-with-these-three-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="comfort zone investing - 3 stocks - 3 runners on a track" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/01/three.runners.getty.jpg" />If you think the economic recovery is just beginning, then these three stocks will benefit. They've just released their earnings so you can see how they've fared even in these tough times. They all share positive attributes: plenty of cash, growing sales and earnings, and a dividend.</p>
<p><strong>General Electric (</strong><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"><strong>GE</strong></a><strong>):</strong> This stock has been a frustration for years. It cut the dividend. The price went from $38 a share to $8 from 2008 to 2009. Now it's coming back. The latest quarterly and annual reports for 2010 confirm the company's finally seeing better demand for most of its products and services.</p>
<p>GE mirrors the economy because it's in so many different parts of it. Here are only some of its offerings: jet engines, light bulbs, credit, mortgage finance, appliances, power plants, locomotives, electric distribution and control equipment, generators and turbines, real estate, commercial finance, aircraft leasing, NBC Universal, health care and several more. When the economy does well, so does GE.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/29/comfort-zone-investing-ride-the-recovery-with-these-three-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: Ride the Recovery with These Three Stocks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/29/comfort-zone-investing-ride-the-recovery-with-these-three-stock/">Comfort Zone Investing: Ride the Recovery with These Three Stocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/29/comfort-zone-investing-ride-the-recovery-with-these-three-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19814588/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/29/comfort-zone-investing-ride-the-recovery-with-these-three-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>IBM</category><category>INTC</category><category>stocks to own</category><category>tech stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jim Rogers Is Still a Big-Time Commodities Bull]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/27/jim-rogers-commodities-bull/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/27/jim-rogers-commodities-bull/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/27/jim-rogers-commodities-bull/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="gold" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/gold.jpg" />After a torrid year, the commodities markets showed some weakness is January. For example, gold fell by about 6%.</p>
<p>So is this a correction or finally a bear market?</p>
<p>Well, legendary investor, Jim Rogers, still thinks that commodities are the best place for your investment dollars (according to an <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/41286081">interview</a> on CNBC). No doubt, he has lots of credibility. When others snickered, Rogers started to invest in commodities in the late 1990s. He even wrote a book on the topic.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/27/jim-rogers-commodities-bull/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jim Rogers Is Still a Big-Time Commodities Bull</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/27/jim-rogers-commodities-bull/">Jim Rogers Is Still a Big-Time Commodities Bull</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/27/jim-rogers-commodities-bull/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19817774/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/27/jim-rogers-commodities-bull/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodities</category><category>commodities ETF</category><category>CRSOX</category><category>crude oil</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>GLD</category><category>gold</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iShares Silver Trust</category><category>Jim Rogers</category><category>oil prices</category><category>precious metals</category><category>SLV</category><category>SPDR Gold Shares</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Holiday Sales Falling Short of Expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="holdiay shopping" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/10/retail240.jpg" />December is not shaping up to have been the retail windfall that many experts predicted, which may be setting up a rather scary situation. Don't worry folks, the experts are going to blame the <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/retailers-report-surprisingly-weak/616715/" target="_blank">poor December revenue</a> on different factors, including strong November sales taking away from December and post-Christmas sales suffering from the Northeast blizzard. <br />
<br />
First things first, not all retailers have reported their results -- a majority of heavy hitters will report today. Nevertheless, the results are being described as "slow and steady" rather than the expected blowout holiday shopping season. For example, Costco (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas" target="_blank">COST</a>) reported sales that increased 6%. This is positive data, unfortunately expectations called for an increase of 6.2%. Target (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys" target="_blank">TGT</a>) saw sales increase 0.9%, well short of the expected 4%. Of course sales were better at Macy's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/macy-s-inc/m/nys" target="_blank">M</a>), right? I mean they are adding jobs and all. Wrong, sales did increase (3.9%) but missed expectations (4.5%).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Holiday Sales Falling Short of Expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/">Holiday Sales Falling Short of Expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19789788/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/holiday-sales-fall-short-of-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>COST</category><category>Costco</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economy</category><category>holiday sales</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Macys</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Confidence Drops in December]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="consumer confidence" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/12/retailsales-1292337646.jpg" />Just as we are hearing that retailers had a great December, we get news from the Conference Board that U.S. consumer confidence <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/december-consumer-confidence-dips-to-525-2010-12-28" target="_blank">dropped to 52.5 in December</a>. Expectations had been for an increase to 56.9, making for quite a disparity between expectation and reality.</p>
<p>The director of the Conference Board's consumer research center, Lynn Franco, noted that "Consumers' assessment of the current state of the economy and labor market remains tepid, and their outlook remains cautious." Franco added that signs suggest continuing growth for the economy, "but that the pace of growth will remain moderate."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Confidence Drops in December</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/">Consumer Confidence Drops in December</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19779032/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/28/consumer-confidence-drops-in-december/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Conference Board</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Lynn Franco</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Durable Goods Orders Drop in November]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/durable-goods-orders-fall-in-november/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/durable-goods-orders-fall-in-november/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/durable-goods-orders-fall-in-november/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/commercedept.jpg" alt="Department of Commerce seal" />Thursday morning, the Commerce Department announced that orders for U.S.-made durable goods <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/november-durable-goods-orders-fall-2010-12-23?dist=beforebell">dropped during November</a>, falling 1.3% for the month. The drop was larger than the expected drop of 0.5%.</p>
<p>Taking transportation out of the picture, new orders increased by 2.4%, showing that the major drag on the data was transportation-equipment orders. Core durable-goods orders (which exclude defense and aircraft) increased 2.6%, a far better performance than the 3.6% decline in October. Analysts at Barclay's Capital called for a gain in core capital goods that reflect, "further expansion in the manufacturing sector."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/durable-goods-orders-fall-in-november/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Durable Goods Orders Drop in November</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/durable-goods-orders-fall-in-november/">Durable Goods Orders Drop in November</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/durable-goods-orders-fall-in-november/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19775136/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/23/durable-goods-orders-fall-in-november/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>durable goods</category><category>durable goods orders</category><category>economic indicators</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ciena Shoots Higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/ciena-shoots-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/ciena-shoots-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/ciena-shoots-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cien/" rel="tag">Ciena Corp (CIEN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/ciena-logo.jpg" alt="Ciena logo" />As noted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/ciena-recovers-after-summer-swoon/">in September</a>, broadband/bandwidth play Ciena's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ciena-corporation/cien/nas">CIEN</a>) pop back above the key, 50-day moving average was a good omen, and the stock has since rocketed up to about $21, taking out psychological resistance at $20.</p>
<p>Ciena, first discussed here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/consider-ciena-because-the-broadband-era-has-just-begun/">on May 19, 2009</a>, at a price of $11.27, remains on track to post a roughly 50% increase in revenue in FY2011, after a likely 80% to 90% increase in FY2010, aided by revenue from its $521 million acquisition of Nortel's Metro Ethernet Networking business in March.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/ciena-shoots-higher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ciena Shoots Higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/ciena-shoots-higher/">Ciena Shoots Higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/ciena-shoots-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19770164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/ciena-shoots-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CIEN</category><category>Ciena</category><category>Ciena rally</category><category>Ciena revenue</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>Metro Ethernet Networking</category><category>telecoms</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed Holds Rates Steady, Surprises No One]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/fed-holds-rates-steady-surprises-no-one/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/fed-holds-rates-steady-surprises-no-one/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/fed-holds-rates-steady-surprises-no-one/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/federalreserveseal.jpg" />The news is out, the Federal Reserve decided to <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-holds-rate-target-bond-buy-plan-steady-2010-12-14" target="_blank">leave its key interest rate and the size of its bond purchase program unchanged</a>. This move should surprise very few, with the tepid reaction from investors serving as evidence. The Fed funds rate remains in its all-time low range of 0 to 0.25%, its perch since December 2008. The move was not unanimous, as Thomas Hoenig, President of the Kansas City Fed, dissented with a warning that a large stimulus could lead to inflationary expectations that could in turn choke off any economic recovery.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/fed-holds-rates-steady-surprises-no-one/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed Holds Rates Steady, Surprises No One</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/fed-holds-rates-steady-surprises-no-one/">Fed Holds Rates Steady, Surprises No One</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/fed-holds-rates-steady-surprises-no-one/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19760587/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/fed-holds-rates-steady-surprises-no-one/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>fed</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>fomc</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nine Reasons for Slow U.S. Economic Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/nine-reasons-for-slow-u-s-economic-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/nine-reasons-for-slow-u-s-economic-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/nine-reasons-for-slow-u-s-economic-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/gary-shilling-240-x-160-1289514507.jpg" alt="" />In my new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Age-Deleveraging-Investment-Strategies-Deflation/dp/0470596368"><em>The Age of Deleveraging: Investment Strategies for an Era of Slow Growth and Deflation</em></a>, I discuss nine reasons for slow U.S. economic growth and real GDP gains of about 2% annually in the long run.</p>
<p><strong>1.</strong> U.S. consumers will shift from a 25-year borrowing-and-spending binge to a saving spree. This will spread abroad as American consumers curtail the imports of the goods and services many foreign nations depend on for economic growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/nine-reasons-for-slow-u-s-economic-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nine Reasons for Slow U.S. Economic Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/nine-reasons-for-slow-u-s-economic-growth/">Nine Reasons for Slow U.S. Economic Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/nine-reasons-for-slow-u-s-economic-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19755500/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/nine-reasons-for-slow-u-s-economic-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Age of Deleveraging</category><category>commodities</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>deflation</category><category>deleveraging</category><category>economic growth</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal restraint</category><category>Gary Shilling</category><category>GDP</category><category>global economy</category><category>housing</category><category>protectionism</category><category>regulation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Shilling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment Data Is Disturbing, Underemployment Numbers Are Staggering]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />This morning, my colleague Connie Madon reported that initial jobless claims showed a <a target="_blank" href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/02/news/economy/initial_claims/">disappointing gain of just 39,000 jobs</a> and an unemployment rate at a seven-month high of 9.8%. Remember that the Street expected job growth of 144,000. This disappointing data has helped push the Dow Jones as we head through the lunch hour. I wanted to take a look at a couple tidbits of news from the report, one that I find especially disturbing.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment Data Is Disturbing, Underemployment Numbers Are Staggering</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/">Unemployment Data Is Disturbing, Underemployment Numbers Are Staggering</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19745532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-data-is-disturbing-underemployment-numbers-are-sta/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>financial recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>underemployment</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fewer Small Business Start-Ups Mean Fewer Jobs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/economyjoblessclaims.06e8c18970d341d59b607c74596d39fa.jpg" alt="job seeker" />Fewer business start-ups are being launched, reports the the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704648604575621061892216250.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_smallbusiness"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. The Labor Department said that the number of companies with at least one employee fell by 100,000, or 2%, in the year ended March 31. That was the second worst performance in 18 years -- the worst one was a drop of 3.4% the previous year.</p>
<p>Why are these numbers important? In past recessions small business start-ups were the key to spurring the economy. In the three quarters that ended in March, newly formed companies created only 2.6 million jobs, 15% fewer than in the first three quarters of the last recovery.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fewer Small Business Start-Ups Mean Fewer Jobs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/">Fewer Small Business Start-Ups Mean Fewer Jobs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19727228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business start-ups</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>small business</category><category>venture capital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke: Inflation Too Low and Economic Growth Too Slow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/bernanke-inflation-too-low-and-the-economy-growing-too-slowly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/bernanke-inflation-too-low-and-the-economy-growing-too-slowly/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/bernanke-inflation-too-low-and-the-economy-growing-too-slowly/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/bernankeaug.jpg"  alt="Ben Bernanke" />U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gave his reasons for more <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Quantitative%20Easing">quantitative easing</a>, dubbed QE2, in a speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, and reported in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704779704575553813746866210.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEADNewsCollection"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</p>
<p>The linchpin of his thesis is that inflation is too low, currently running at 1.1%. This is lower than the 2% level that the Fed had previously set.</p>
<p>Bernanke gave a rather gloomy assessment of the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/">economy</a>, saying that business spending has slowed, consumer finances are improving unevenly, housing remains depressed and job growth isn't enough to bring down unemployment.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/bernanke-inflation-too-low-and-the-economy-growing-too-slowly/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernanke: Inflation Too Low and Economic Growth Too Slow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/bernanke-inflation-too-low-and-the-economy-growing-too-slowly/">Bernanke: Inflation Too Low and Economic Growth Too Slow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/bernanke-inflation-too-low-and-the-economy-growing-too-slowly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19675580/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/bernanke-inflation-too-low-and-the-economy-growing-too-slowly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>COLA</category><category>core inflation index</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PPI</category><category>producer price index</category><category>QE2</category><category>quantitative easing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Crude Oil Inventories Unexpectedly Rise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/crude-oil-inventories-unexpectedly-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/crude-oil-inventories-unexpectedly-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/crude-oil-inventories-unexpectedly-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oil-pipeline.jpg" />This morning, the Energy Department reported a surprise increase in oil inventories, leading crude futures lower thus far. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported that <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/crude-oil-heads-lower-after-inventories-data-2010-10-06" target="_blank">crude oil stockpiles increased 3.1 million barrels</a>. Analysts had expected a decrease of 1.3 million barrels in crude oil inventories. Despite the surprise, oil prices weren't as low as one would think. November-dated crude was trading below $83 per barrel shortly after the inventory report.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/crude-oil-inventories-unexpectedly-rise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Crude Oil Inventories Unexpectedly Rise</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/crude-oil-inventories-unexpectedly-rise/">Crude Oil Inventories Unexpectedly Rise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/crude-oil-inventories-unexpectedly-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19663195/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/crude-oil-inventories-unexpectedly-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crude inventories</category><category>crude oil</category><category>economic data</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>opec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IMF: Global Financial System Hinders Economic Recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/imf-logo-240.jpg" alt="IMF" />According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the global financial system may be the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/financial-system-is-economys-achilles-heel-imf-2010-10-05">biggest hindrance to a worldwide economic recovery</a>. The IMF used its global financial stability report to make this announcement, one that suggests there isn't a lot of stability thanks mainly to the global financial system.</p>
<p>The IMF estimated that the writedowns attributed to the credit crisis were $2.2 trillion, lower than the $2.3 trillion originally projected in April.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IMF: Global Financial System Hinders Economic Recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/">IMF: Global Financial System Hinders Economic Recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19661168/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/05/imf-global-financial-system-hinders-economic-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>IMF</category><category>International Monetary Fund</category><category>inthenews</category><category>world economic forum</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
