BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com BloggingStocks http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/feedlogo.gif BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: The seductive pull of the early cycle ]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-seductive-pull-of-the-early-cycle/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-seductive-pull-of-the-early-cycle/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-the-seductive-pull-of-the-early-cycle/#commentsFiled under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer is seeing signs of a coming boom, but he's still being cautious here.

If you had to define the early cycle, if you had to outline what stocks should be soaring coming out of a recession into a boom and which ones should be faltering, you would have to say the action in this market in the last month is the quintessential behavioral pattern.

What are the components of the early cycle? First, it's the homebuilders. As is typical coming out of a recession, the stocks precede the bottom of housing. That's exactly what's happening with the lowest permits and highest affordability and best mortgage rates and massive inventory. Everywhere, except on Wall Street reporting, the bottom is bursting out. When you read the lead story in the Sunday Philadelphia Inquirer, and it is all about the thousands of prospective homebuyers heading south to pick up condos and homes for half of what they were worth two years ago -- or even less -- and you know that virtually no one has broken ground in the Sunshine State in a year, you can bet that the bottom's actually behind us. This housing market has wiped out all but the most stable private builders and even the public ones are merging as we know from Pulte (NYSE: PHM) (Cramer's Take) and Centex (NYSE: CTX) (Cramer's Take). So, in the next cycle, you can see some profitability developing year over year even though the new homes don't have much margin because the foreclosed homes next door are going for a song. And don't believe this won't change the dynamic of future foreclosures. In most areas, rent is higher than the interest on mortgages, so you will find that second or third job needed to stay in your home. The incentive structure's radically different than a year ago.

Continue reading Cramer on BloggingStocks: The seductive pull of the early cycle

Cramer on BloggingStocks: The seductive pull of the early cycle originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>abtalvanaxpazoccelgcofctbctxcvseateftcffeaturedfmergildgisgmgpshnzhsyjcijcpjim cramerJimCramerjnsjnyjwnkkmxkssmmnropbypeppgphmpnrarostschwshldtgttjxtrowunwagyumMon, 20 Apr 2009 10:30:00 EST<![CDATA[E*Trade: Is there a case here?]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/e-trade-is-there-a-case-here/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/e-trade-is-there-a-case-here/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/e-trade-is-there-a-case-here/#commentsFiled under: ,

When E*Trade Financial Corp. (Nasdaq: ETFC) had its meltdown, I considered buying but I was too chicken. I mean, can you really blame me? When it got caught up in the financial crisis, the term "falling knife" never felt so accurate. A 52-week range between $2.08 and $25.79 is a pretty scary thing; to see what I mean in graphic format, feast your eyes on the chart.

Lately, though, I've been warming up to the idea ever so slightly of taking a shot on E*Trade. I can't say I possess strong conviction yet, but I'm not necessarily afraid of owning financial stocks. In fact, as an example, I own Newcastle Investment (NYSE: NCT), an idea that Sheldon Liber talked about recently, one that has a pretty frightening yield. E*Trade is a significant name in the online-brokerage industry, and its brand is valuable. When I saw the company falling off a cliff last year, my instinct to buy started to kick in, insisting that it isn't going to go the way of the dodo. Plus, takeover theories began, further fueling my fascination. In the end, I took no action.

Now, though, the stock has bounced nicely off its lows. And it reported January data yesterday that had a couple of good data points. Daily average revenue trades are up 18.8% for the month-to-month timeframe, and they increased 21.5% year-over-year. End-of-period retail accounts were flat month-to-month, and were up 6.2% year-over-year. Total retail client assets did decrease, however -- year-over-year, they declined over 12%. And, hey, for whatever this is worth, its Super Bowl "Talking Baby" ads apparently were a hit.

At any rate, I'm a bit more sanguine on E*Trade's stock potential. I may not buy just yet, but the closer it gets to $6 or $7 a stub, the better the chance it has, in my mind, of going to double digits again. Sure, Schwab (NASDAQ: SCHW) and TD Ameritrade (NASDAQ: AMTD) are the safer broker bets, but I can't help looking at E*Trade.

E*Trade: Is there a case here? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>brokerE*Tradeeftcetrade financialEtradeFinancialfinancialsNewcastle Investment Corp.NewcastleInvestmentCorp.SchwabThu, 14 Feb 2008 14:00:00 EST<![CDATA[Could Citadel's valuation of E*Trade's CDOs wipe out capital at three big banks?]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/could-citadels-valuation-of-e-trades-cdos-wipe-out-capital-at/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/could-citadels-valuation-of-e-trades-cdos-wipe-out-capital-at/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/could-citadels-valuation-of-e-trades-cdos-wipe-out-capital-at/#commentsFiled under: , , , ,

Last week, Citadel Investment Group, a Chicago hedge fund, bought E*Trade Financial (NASDAQ: ETFC)'s collateralized debt obligation (CDO) portfolio for 27 cents on the dollar according to The Wall Street Journal [subscription required]. If this price was applied to the Level 3 assets of nine of the largest banks, it would wipe out the capital of three of them.

It's important to point out, before presenting this analysis, that the 27 cents on the dollar price that Citadel paid applied only to E-Trade's CDOs. It may represent a worst case scenario price for these banks. Furthermore, the Level 3 assets of these nine banks include other illiquid securities besides their CDOs. Finally, the calculations I'll show are based on the most recent Level 3 assets and equity of these banks as of last month.

Having said that, here are the three banks whose capital would be wiped out if that 27 cents on the dollar valuation was applied to their Level 3 assets and written off from their most recent capital levels:

Continue reading Could Citadel's valuation of E*Trade's CDOs wipe out capital at three big banks?

Could Citadel's valuation of E*Trade's CDOs wipe out capital at three big banks? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>bsccdoscollateralized debt obligationsCollateralizedDebtObligationseftcgslevel 3Level3mswall streetWallStreetTue, 04 Dec 2007 10:10:00 EST<![CDATA[Will E*Trade go bankrupt?]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/will-e-trade-go-bankrupt/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/will-e-trade-go-bankrupt/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/will-e-trade-go-bankrupt/#commentsFiled under: , , , , , ,

E*Trade Financial (NASDAQ: ETFC) logo E*Trade Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: ETFC) imploded today after the company warned of worse-than-expected earnings and a Citigroup (NYSE: C) analyst said that the company might have to file for bankruptcy protection.

Shares of the company, which has cut earnings forecasts four times this year, plunged to levels not seen since 2003. E*Trade, which lost $58.5 million, or 14 cents a share, in the period ending September 30, expects 2007 profit of between 75 cents and 90 cents, a range big enough to drive a tractor-trailer through. Shares of the New York-based company have plunged 53%.

In a note to clients, analyst Prashant Bhatia said that poor management has "put the viability of the franchise at risk" and that "bankruptcy risk cannot be ruled out," according to Bloomberg News. He cut his rating on the stock to "sell" from "neutral."

Continue reading Will E*Trade go bankrupt?

Will E*Trade go bankrupt? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>cfce*trade financialE*tradeFinancialeftcetradefeaturedhousinghousing marketHousingMarketmortgage industrymortgage marketMortgageIndustryMortgageMarketsubprime mortgagesSubprimeMortgagesMon, 12 Nov 2007 11:29:00 EST<![CDATA[Before the bell: M&A talks give Wall Street a lift]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/before-the-bell-manda-talks-give-wall-street-a-lift/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/before-the-bell-manda-talks-give-wall-street-a-lift/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/22/before-the-bell-manda-talks-give-wall-street-a-lift/#commentsFiled under: , , , , ,

U.S. stock futures are shooting up, indicating a strong start for today's session as absent M&A talks and speculations once again hit center stage. Investors are also increasingly expecting the Federal Reserve will cut rates soon. However, it seems that Fed Chairman Bernanke aims to avoid an emergency rate cut and continue with his strategy of increasing liquidity.

Yesterday, stocks ended mixed, with the Dow industrials losing 30 points while the Nasdaq Composite rising 12 points and the S&P 500 gaining 1.5 points amid constant expectations and speculations regarding the Fed's policy. Fed and Treasury officials gave statements that could be interpreted both ways. The Fed meets again on September 18, and while many would prefer a rate cut sooner than that, most expect the Fed to move then.

But what really is moving the market this morning is M&A talks and speculations, specifically a report from the Wall Street Journal saying that E-Trade (NASDAQ: ETFC) and TD Ameritrade (NASDAQ: AMTD) are talking merger.

State-owned Dubai World also agreed to pay $5 billion for a 9.5% stake in MGM Mirage (NYSE: MGM) -- that's 14 million shares at $84 each, a 13% premium over yesterday's closing price.

Still in deals, the parent company of the New York Mercantile Exchange, NYMEX Holdings (NYSE: NMX) disclosed it's held talks to be purchased, and said it wanted a "meaningful premium."

Economic data is light today with the weekly jobless claims report out at 8:30 a.m.

Overseas, European and Asian stocks mostly gained on speculation the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates.

In other corporate news:

Toll Brothers Inc. (NYSE: TOL) reported its fiscal third-quarter profits which tumbled 85% to $26.5 million, or 16 cents a share. Excluding write-downs, earnings were 70 cents a share for the quarter. Analysts, on average, predicted a loss of 2 cents a share for the quarter. TOL shares are up 4.3% in premarket trading (7:26 a.m.).

Before the bell: M&A talks give Wall Street a lift originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 07:47:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>amtdeftcmgmnmxtolWed, 22 Aug 2007 07:47:00 EST