<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="laborers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/springhill1.jpg" />According to the ADP Employer Services Report, the private sector <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/30/us-usa-economy-idUSN3027570820110330">added 201,000 new jobs</a> in March, basically in-line with 203,000 new jobs that analysts had been expecting to see.</p>
<p>February's figures were revised downwards to 208,000 from a previously estimated 216,000 new jobs.</p>
<p>March's employment gains bring the four-month average of new jobs to 211,000, more than enough to keep the labor track on path. Analysts estimate that the economy needs to add 125,000 new jobs each month in order to keep up with population growth, so any jobs over that figure result in a lower unemployment figures.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/">Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19897221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP Employer Services Report</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>economy</category><category>employees</category><category>gas prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobs</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Home Depot Hiring 60,000 Employees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/15/home-depot-hiring-60-000-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/15/home-depot-hiring-60-000-employees/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/15/home-depot-hiring-60-000-employees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/home-depot.jpg" alt="home depot employees" style="width: 280px; height: 190px;" />Home improvement giant Home Depot (HD) announced today that it would be <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/home-depot-to-hire-60-000-seasonal-workers/19844689/">hiring 60,000 seasonal employees</a> nationwide as the company gears up for its busiest season, which is springtime.<br />
<br />
Every year the company boosts its employees to deal with its peak season, and makes the hires in February and March to get the new workers ready when springtime rolls around and traffic really picks up at the company's retail stores across the nation.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/15/home-depot-hiring-60-000-employees/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Home Depot Hiring 60,000 Employees</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/15/home-depot-hiring-60-000-employees/">Home Depot Hiring 60,000 Employees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/15/home-depot-hiring-60-000-employees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19844967/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/15/home-depot-hiring-60-000-employees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employees</category><category>HD</category><category>hiring</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>home repair</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MySpace Cuts Workforce by 47%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p>I<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/myspace-logo.jpg" />n the beginning, the auto industry had a wide array of manufacturers. As the industry grew, new companies formed but most went by the wayside. The same phenomenon is taking place in the Internet. As new companies are formed, older ones fade away.<br />
<br />
Such is the story of MySpace, as the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791904576075892399066126.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews#"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a><em> </em>reports. Founded in 2003, it had a large following of musicians and was the leader in the new concept of social networking. In 2005, News Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) purchased the site for $580 million. The investment was intended to bring News Corp. into the digital age.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MySpace Cuts Workforce by 47%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/">MySpace Cuts Workforce by 47%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19797217/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>competitive stragegy</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>employees</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>Myspace</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford Planning to Hire More Employees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/ford-planning-to-hire-more-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/ford-planning-to-hire-more-employees/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/ford-planning-to-hire-more-employees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/ford-logo-240.jpg" alt="Ford To Hire More Employees" />In another sign that auto industry has bright day ahead of it, Ford Motor Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) announced today that it planned to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/11/business/11ford.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">hire an additional 7,000 employees</a> over the next 2 years.</p>
<p>While this is definitely good news, the figures are still way down from where they were before the auto crisis ravished the industry. Ford currently has 42,000 compared to 103,000 just ten years ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/ford-planning-to-hire-more-employees/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford Planning to Hire More Employees</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/ford-planning-to-hire-more-employees/">Ford Planning to Hire More Employees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/ford-planning-to-hire-more-employees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19795012/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/10/ford-planning-to-hire-more-employees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto</category><category>auto sales</category><category>employees</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>ford employees</category><category>hiring</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/unemployment.jpg" alt="" />The dismal jobs front got a bit more good news, following the release of a report showing the nation's employers last year cut the fewest number of workers in more than a decade. Further, the findings showed 2010 ended on a high note, with December recording the lowest number of monthly cuts since 2000.</p>
<p>The slowdown in cuts follows an uptick in activity in 2009 when downsizing reached a seven-year high, according to the 2010 year-end job-cut report, released Wednesday by job-services firm Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas. Last year, employers announced plans to eliminate 529,973 positions, the lowest number since 1997.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/">Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19787630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>career</category><category>careers</category><category>challenger</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>employees</category><category>employers</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>joblessness</category><category>jobs</category><category>john challenger</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schepp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! Lays Off 600 Employees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/05/yahoo-1274221362.jpg"  alt="Yahoo! (YHOO)" />For a lot of Yahoo! Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) employees, the holiday season is going to be less cheerful than expected as the company announced today that it was <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/yahoo-hands-out-600-layoff-notices-for/1461832/">laying off around 600 employees</a>.<br />
<br />
The most recent layoffs are not that big or a surprise, as analysts have been speculating for the past few weeks that the company would reduce it payroll before the end of the year in hopes of breaking its recent financial woes.<br />
<br />
Yahoo! is headquartered in California, a state that is already dealing with very high unemployment. These layoffs are going to add to California's current 12.4% unemployment rate, which is sharply higher than the national average of 9.8%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! Lays Off 600 Employees</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/">Yahoo! Lays Off 600 Employees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19760845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Bing</category><category>Carol Bartz</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>layoffs</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search engine</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FedEx Earnings Come Up a Little Short]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/16/fedex-q1-earnings-miss-estimates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/16/fedex-q1-earnings-miss-estimates/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/16/fedex-q1-earnings-miss-estimates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/fedex-logo-240x160.jpg" alt="FedEx (FDX) logo" />Shares of international shipping giant FedEx Corp. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FDX</a>) are selling off in early morning trading after the company posted fiscal first quarter results that were <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68F25020100916">a bit shy of analyst estimates</a>.</p>
<p>As we noted in our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/fedex-to-deliver-first-quarter-earnings/">FedEx earnings preview</a>, analysts had been expecting to see the company report earnings of $1.21 for the quarter, but actual results came in a bit lower at $1.20.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/16/fedex-q1-earnings-miss-estimates/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FedEx Earnings Come Up a Little Short</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/16/fedex-q1-earnings-miss-estimates/">FedEx Earnings Come Up a Little Short</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/16/fedex-q1-earnings-miss-estimates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19636281/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/16/fedex-q1-earnings-miss-estimates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>employees</category><category>fdx</category><category>fedex</category><category>FedEx earnings</category><category>FedEx layoffs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>shipping</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Michigan No Longer Boasts Highest Unemployment Rate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/19/michigan-nevada-unemployment-rate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/19/michigan-nevada-unemployment-rate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/19/michigan-nevada-unemployment-rate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/06/vegasnite.jpg" alt="Las Vegas Nevada" />It has been a long time since a state other than Michigan had the honor of claiming the highest unemployment rate in country. The May unemployment numbers show that it is Nevada, not Michigan, that now has the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/06/18/unemployment-rates-by-state-nevada-overtakes-michigan-for-nations-worst/">highest rate of unemployment</a>.</p>
<p>Michigan has held the title for highest unemployment since April 2006, when the automotive industry took a nose dive. But Nevada jumped into the lead by posting a 14% unemployment rate in May. In comparison, Michigan's unemployment level is currently sitting at 13.6%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/19/michigan-nevada-unemployment-rate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Michigan No Longer Boasts Highest Unemployment Rate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/19/michigan-nevada-unemployment-rate/">Michigan No Longer Boasts Highest Unemployment Rate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/19/michigan-nevada-unemployment-rate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19522657/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/19/michigan-nevada-unemployment-rate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>gaming</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>michigan</category><category>nevada</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google Trading Lower Despite Better Than Expected Earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/google-trading-lower-despite-better-than-expected-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/google-trading-lower-despite-better-than-expected-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/google-trading-lower-despite-better-than-expected-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif"  alt="" />Shares of internet search engine giant Google Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) are trading sharply lower in after hours trading despite <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304510004575186310354202110.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEADSecond">posting better than expected earnings</a> for its first quarter.<br />
<br />
Going into this afternoon's earnings release analysts had forecast $6.60 per share, with actual earnings coming in better than expected at $6.76 excluding special items.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/google-trading-lower-despite-better-than-expected-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google Trading Lower Despite Better Than Expected Earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/google-trading-lower-despite-better-than-expected-earnings/">Google Trading Lower Despite Better Than Expected Earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/google-trading-lower-despite-better-than-expected-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19441963/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/google-trading-lower-despite-better-than-expected-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ads</category><category>advertising</category><category>earnings</category><category>employees</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>hiring</category><category>inthenews</category><category>online ads</category><category>search engines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[President Obama cautions against double-dip recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/obama_speaking.jpg" />Although some members of his administration don't hold Fox News in too high of regard, President Barack Obama did sit down with the news outlet to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN188108620091118">discuss the economy</a>. In the interview, President Obama offered what some are calling his "sternest warning" about containing deficits. President Obama believes that a further compilation of government debt could lead to a double-dip recession. </p>
<p>The president believes that his administration faces a "delicate balance of trying to boost the economy and spur job creation," but the administration has to set the economy on "a path toward long-term deficit reduction." He noted that it is important "to recognize ... that at some point, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>President Obama cautions against double-dip recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/">President Obama cautions against double-dip recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>double-dip recession</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Caterpillar announces plans to rehire 550 workers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/caterpillar-announces-plans-to-rehire-550-workers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/caterpillar-announces-plans-to-rehire-550-workers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/caterpillar-announces-plans-to-rehire-550-workers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="cat workers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/caterpillar.jpg" /><span class="news_story_title">There is no question that the recession took its tool on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cat/nas">Caterpillar Inc.</a> (NYSE: CAT). The company saw its stock plummet from mid 2008 through March of this year. Along the way the company was forced to layoff employees to help lower costs, but it announced today that it would be <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aWaNyeYiD82U">rehiring 550 of its laid off workers</a>.<br /><br />Chief Executive Officer Jim Owens announced the news and stated that the company was pleased that "</span>signs of recovery in the global economy" is allowing it to bring back some employees.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/caterpillar-announces-plans-to-rehire-550-workers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Caterpillar announces plans to rehire 550 workers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/caterpillar-announces-plans-to-rehire-550-workers/">Caterpillar announces plans to rehire 550 workers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/caterpillar-announces-plans-to-rehire-550-workers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19210182/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/26/caterpillar-announces-plans-to-rehire-550-workers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAT</category><category>Caterpillar</category><category>employees</category><category>jobs</category><category>machinery</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployment</category><category>workers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[September job cuts steeper than expected]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="september job losses" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/not_hiring_sign.jpg" />Job losses continued to mount in September. Unfortunately, the numbers are even <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/30/adp-report-shows-worse-than-expected-job-losses-in-september/">worse than expected</a>.</p>
<p>According to the ADP National Employment Report, employers shed 254,000 jobs in September. Analysts had been expecting to see the number of job losses at 200,000 in the month.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>September job cuts steeper than expected</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/">September job cuts steeper than expected</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19179409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>jobs</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley set to hire up to 400 traders, sales staff]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/morgan-stanley-set-to-hire-up-to-400-traders-sales-staff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/morgan-stanley-set-to-hire-up-to-400-traders-sales-staff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/morgan-stanley-set-to-hire-up-to-400-traders-sales-staff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" alt="" />A report today in <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125079605522047233.html">The Wall Street Journal</a></em> (subscription required) states that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) is on the verge of a major hiring push. Sources close to the bank holding company said that Morgan Stanley is planning to expand its ranks by as many as 400 new positions in the trading and sales departments, with the hires to be evenly split between the two areas.</p>
<p>Reportedly, Morgan Stanley is embarking on the hiring spree as it attempts to rebuild its position in fixed-income trading, emerging markets, and foreign exchange. So far this year, the banking issue has added approximately 200 employees to its payroll.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/morgan-stanley-set-to-hire-up-to-400-traders-sales-staff/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Morgan Stanley set to hire up to 400 traders, sales staff</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/morgan-stanley-set-to-hire-up-to-400-traders-sales-staff/">Morgan Stanley set to hire up to 400 traders, sales staff</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/morgan-stanley-set-to-hire-up-to-400-traders-sales-staff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19136450/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/morgan-stanley-set-to-hire-up-to-400-traders-sales-staff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>options</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors to boost output]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/general-motors-to-boost-output/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/general-motors-to-boost-output/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/general-motors-to-boost-output/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-gm-200cs080708.jpg" alt="General Motors Cash for Clunkers" />The government's "cash for clunkers" has been far more popular than anyone thought, prompting <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/autos/gm-to-hike-output-on-clunkers-sales/626984">General Motors to boost production</a> at several factories to keep up with demand.<br /><br />While not everyone is so convinced that the "cash for clunkers" program is good for the economy, there is no doubt that the big American car makers are enjoying the benefits. Five days ago I wrote about the decision by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/ford-f-boosts-fourth-quarter-production/">boost production by 15%</a> above its prior estimates, and today General Motors announced it will raising output and bringing back employees that it had been forced to lay off.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/general-motors-to-boost-output/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Motors to boost output</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/general-motors-to-boost-output/">General Motors to boost output</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/general-motors-to-boost-output/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19133182/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/general-motors-to-boost-output/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto makers</category><category>AutoMakers</category><category>autos</category><category>cash for clunkers</category><category>CashForClunkers</category><category>employees</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Has the sharp increase in layoffs finally peaked?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/has-the-sharp-increse-in-layoffs-finally-peaked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/has-the-sharp-increse-in-layoffs-finally-peaked/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/has-the-sharp-increse-in-layoffs-finally-peaked/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/not_hiring_sign.jpg" alt="Unemployment data" />The market has been trading lower today, despite news that new jobless claims dropped much more <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/new-jobless-claims-plunge-retail-sales/469701">than analysts had been predicting</a>.<br /><br />The Department of labor announced today that there were 601,000 first time applicants for unemployment last week. While it is tough to find the bright side of this many people losing their jobs, the silver lining is that analysts had been expecting to see the report to show 635,000 new applicants.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/has-the-sharp-increse-in-layoffs-finally-peaked/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Has the sharp increase in layoffs finally peaked?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/has-the-sharp-increse-in-layoffs-finally-peaked/">Has the sharp increase in layoffs finally peaked?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 May 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/has-the-sharp-increse-in-layoffs-finally-peaked/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1539789/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/has-the-sharp-increse-in-layoffs-finally-peaked/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>employees</category><category>hiring</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>JoblessClaims</category><category>jobs</category><category>layoffs</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does a shorter workweek beat unemployment?  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3552/3320623280_75b5be54a2_m.jpg" target="_blank"><img hspace="4" height="179" border="1" align="right" width="220" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/pink-slip.jpg" alt="New store pink slip - opening soon" /></a>As the unemployment rate continues to creep toward the 10% threshold, some companies are exploring more creative ways to cut down on labor costs without handing out pink slips. <br /><br />Case in point, as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/jobs/01workweek.html?_r=1" target="_blank">reviewed </a>by <em>The New York Times</em>: the Vera Institute of Justice, which has reduced some employees' workweeks to 24 hours (or three days out of five). In this example, workers take a 40% reduction in salary as well, but no loss in benefits. Other companies require 32 hours of work in order to retain health care and other benefits.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does a shorter workweek beat unemployment?  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/">Does a shorter workweek beat unemployment?  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/jobs/01workweek.html?_r=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1475717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/does-a-shorter-workweek-beat-unemployment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benefits</category><category>employees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><category>workweek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UBS AG (UBS) fourth quarter earnings preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/ubs-ag-ubs-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/ubs-ag-ubs-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/ubs-ag-ubs-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="UBS AG" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/ubs-ubs-logo.jpg" />The earnings parade continues tomorrow, and in the morning Wall Street will get to see how Swiss Bank <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys">UBS AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys">UBS</a>) made out for its fourth quarter. <br /><br />The company is going to be reporting in the morning, and expectations are not running very high for the troubled bank. Analysts on average are looking to see the company show a loss for the quarter of $1.15 per share. While this looks pretty bad at first glance, it would be a great improvement over the same period last year in which the company showed an actual loss of $5.43 per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/ubs-ag-ubs-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UBS AG (UBS) fourth quarter earnings preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/ubs-ag-ubs-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/">UBS AG (UBS) fourth quarter earnings preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/ubs-ag-ubs-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/ubs-ag-ubs-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings previews</category><category>EarningsPreviews</category><category>employees</category><category>europe</category><category>Jerker Johansson</category><category>JerkerJohansson</category><category>layoffs</category><category>Switzerland</category><category>UBS</category><category>UBS AG</category><category>UbsAg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nissan (NSANY) job cuts run deep]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/nissan-nsany-job-cuts-run-deep/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/nissan-nsany-job-cuts-run-deep/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/nissan-nsany-job-cuts-run-deep/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/thailand/" rel="tag">Thailand</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nsany/" rel="tag">Nissan Motors (NSANY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/nsany-nissan-motors-logo.jpg" />For employees of Japan's third largest automaker, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nissan-motor-co-ltd-american-depositary-shares-exempt-pursuant-to-12g3-2-b/nsany/nas">Nissan Motor Co.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nissan-motor-co-ltd-american-depositary-shares-exempt-pursuant-to-12g3-2-b/nsany/nas">NSANY</a>),</strong> the news today was grim. Nissan announced it will be <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/nissan-to-slash-20000-jobs-and-sees/333926">eliminating a hefty 8.5% of its workforce</a>, or roughly 20,000 jobs.<br /><br />The news comes at a time when all automakers are struggling to deal with the global recession that continues to keep car buyers off the showroom floors. Nissan said it expects to report its first annual loss in the past nine years.<br /><br />For the company's most recent quarter, October through December, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123415779977362699.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Nissan reported a $904 million quarterly loss</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/nissan-nsany-job-cuts-run-deep/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nissan (NSANY) job cuts run deep</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/nissan-nsany-job-cuts-run-deep/">Nissan (NSANY) job cuts run deep</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/nissan-nsany-job-cuts-run-deep/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454418/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/nissan-nsany-job-cuts-run-deep/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sales</category><category>autos</category><category>AutoSales</category><category>cars</category><category>earnings</category><category>employees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Japan</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>Nissan</category><category>NSANY</category><category>thailand</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What the heck was Microsoft thinking?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-the-heck-was-microsoft-thinking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-the-heck-was-microsoft-thinking/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-the-heck-was-microsoft-thinking/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>One of the biggest complaints of the public equity markets is the incredibly <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/12-keys-to-trading-earnings.html">short-term focus</a> of participants. Management teams for publicly traded entities face severe consequences from a market short on patience.</p>
<p>Decisions tend to be focused on delivering short-term results. The "<a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/01/3-bullish-earnings-plays.html">beat the number</a>" game has become standard operating procedure. Such is the cost of accessing capital while providing shareholders liquidity.</p>
<p>But is worth it? I'm not so sure.</p>
<p>Investors want the company to make as much money as possible in the short term. As a result, if a company is not profitable in a given quarter, there is extreme pressure to cut costs and to do so immediately -- no matter the longer-term expense of such action.</p>
<p>In many cases cutting costs are exactly the right tonic to rejuvenate profits, but in some instances, those short-term cuts can do more damage than good.</p>
<p>This past week, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) dropped a big bomb on the market by releasing its quarterly earnings earlier than expected. Lost in the headline of the lower revenue and earnings number was the announcement that the company would be cutting 5,000 jobs from its rolls.</p>
<p>For the first time in its history, MSFT is laying off employees. My question is, why bother?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-the-heck-was-microsoft-thinking/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What the heck was Microsoft thinking?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-the-heck-was-microsoft-thinking/">What the heck was Microsoft thinking?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-the-heck-was-microsoft-thinking/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1439212/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-the-heck-was-microsoft-thinking/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>employees</category><category>job cut</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCut</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>microsoft employees</category><category>MicrosoftEmployees</category><category>navellier</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors to layoff 2,000 more employees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/general-motors-to-layoff-2-000-more-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/general-motors-to-layoff-2-000-more-employees/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/general-motors-to-layoff-2-000-more-employees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img height="229" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/chevytruck.jpg" width="305" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Employees of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) got the bad news today that there are going to be <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/gm-to-lay-off-2000-more-workers-at-3/256727">another 2,000 layoffs coming</a> at three of the company's car factories.</p>
<p>The struggling auto maker announced today that layoffs will be coming to its plants in Lordstown, Ohio; Orion Township, Mich.; and Oshawa, Ontario. The planned layoffs are scheduled to begin sometime in February.</p>
<p>It is no secret the company has been going through some tough times, and recently appealed to the government for some bailout assistance, and the root cause of these current layoffs is, of course, the slowing demand for the company's vehicles.</p>
<p>This is not the first time this year that GM has been forced to announce layoffs, and adds to the 11,000 factory jobs that were eliminated earlier in the year. The current 2,000 jobs represent 2.4% of the company's total North American blue-collar work force, which is currently employing 84,000 people. The Lordstown, Ohio news comes just one month after an announced layoff of 1,100 other jobs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/general-motors-to-layoff-2-000-more-employees/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Motors to layoff 2,000 more employees</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/general-motors-to-layoff-2-000-more-employees/">General Motors to layoff 2,000 more employees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/general-motors-to-layoff-2-000-more-employees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1392803/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/general-motors-to-layoff-2-000-more-employees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sales</category><category>autos</category><category>employees</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoffs</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
