<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #10: Take a good look around]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #10 why the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame11.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Do you see a rebound? </p>
<p>The Mall of America would be a great practice field for the Minnesota Vikings, fall and winter clothes are already 40% off at Macy's, and the Palms in Vegas is mailing me coupons.</p>
<p>Recently, I went out to eat with some friends: One owns a construction business that has come to a standstill; two are media types out of work; and one is the owner of a small manufacturing company, who is laying people off as fast as she can and is now worried about her own survival. And I'm sure you've heard similar tales of woes from your family, friends and neighbors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #10: Take a good look around</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/">Reason #10: Take a good look around</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-10-take-a-good-look-around/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>GDP</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #9: The Fed can't do it either]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #9 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame10.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Historically, the Fed has lowered interest rates to spur spending and investment. </p>
<p>Well, the Fed has already cut interest rates to banks down to essentially zero. The media are screaming about potential inflation due to the trillion dollars the Fed put into the system, but that trillion has simply replaced the trillion written down by the banks, which have another trillion and a half in write-downs to go.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #9: The Fed can't do it either</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/">Reason #9: The Fed can't do it either</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207502/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-9-the-fed-cant-do-it-either/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>interest rates</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #8 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame9.jpg" width="160" height="213" />In the past, the government has increased spending and cut taxes to spur spending during times of economic crisis.</p>
<p>However, Uncle Sam is now in so much debt that this is no longer a serious option. And it looks like we are going to spend another $900 billion-plus on health care reform over 10 years (a lot of money, sure, but about a third less than what Wall Street will spend on bonuses).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/">Reason #8: Uncle Sam can't bail us out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-8-uncle-sam-cant-bail-us-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailouts</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>health care reform</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #7: Businesses aren't spending]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #7 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame8.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Businesses do not see a turnaround in 2010. Even with public figures talking up the economy (and who can blame them, it's practically in their job description) businesses are not listening. If consumers aren't spending, why should businesses? </p>
<p>For example, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) said the year will close strong, although it still will be down compared to 2008. This end-of-the-year optimism is being driven by a once-in-five-year change in the <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/jim_woods/windows-7-msft-dell-hpq-stocks.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=investorplace" target="_blank">Windows operating system</a> -- something that should have created booming demand, not a modest uptick.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #7: Businesses aren't spending</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/">Reason #7: Businesses aren't spending</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-7-businesses-arent-spending/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>WIndows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #6: Excess capacity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #6 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame7.jpg" width="150" height="200" />Excess capacity is everywhere -- we have more than enough people, factories, stores, and so on to meet current demand. </p>
<p>Want to buy an indoor mall? You can get one in North Myrtle Beach for $3.3 million -- less than the previous value of many homes in that area.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #6: Excess capacity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/">Reason #6: Excess capacity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #5: The credit crunch will continue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #5 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame6.jpg" width="160" height="213" />By year-end 2009, we will see a more than $4 trillion pullback in credit lines. And we are a country that runs on credit. In fact, the entire growth in consumer spending from 1997 to 2008 was paid for with home equity lines and credit cards. </p>
<p>Credit standards are already impossibly high. My credit lines literally shrink every month because I do not use them. But what if I needed them? And I almost couldn't get a lease for a new car even though I have never missed a bill payment. The majority of people cannot borrow money and, therefore, cannot spend. This will not change in 2010.</p>
<p><strong>Next: Reason #6: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/25/reason-6-excess-capacity/">Excess capacity </a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/">Reason #5: The credit crunch will continue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-5-the-credit-crunch-will-continue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>credit</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #4: Changing consumer attitudes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #4 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame5.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Not only are consumers not spending, their actual attitudes toward spending have changed. </p>
<p>Even for the six people on the block who are flush with cash, <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/stocks-to-buy-in-a-recession.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=optionszone" target="_blank">frugality is the new chic</a>. My neighbors, high-end Saab and Volkswagen types, just bought a Kia Sportage for their daughter (nice car, by the way).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #4: Changing consumer attitudes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/">Reason #4: Changing consumer attitudes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207527/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>frugality</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #3: Consumers are afraid to spend money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #3 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame4.jpg" width="160" height="213" />A fear of a loss of income will continue to squelch consumer spending. Most people I know are fearful about their futures -- i.e., losing their jobs or seeing a cut in commissions, profits, or wages. This means they will hang on to their pennies in 2010. </p>
<p>Bottom line: Consumers drive 70% of GDP, and a meaningful recovery will not happen without their dollars.</p>
<p><strong>Next: Reason #4: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-4-changing-consumer-attitudes/">Changing consumer attitudes</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/">Reason #3: Consumers are afraid to spend money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-3-consumers-are-afraid-to-spend-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>GDP</category><category>income</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #2: The jobless recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #2 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame3.jpg" width="160" height="213" />The pundits on CNBC get all giggly when we lose "only" 550,000 jobs -- a true sign of the times. Uber analyst Meredith Whitney, one of the few people on Wall Street who has been worth listening to during the past three years, is forecasting 13% unemployment in 2010 or 2011.</p>
<p>Officially, unemployment currently stands at 9.8%. But if you add in part-time workers wanting more work and the people who are so discouraged they have stopped looking, the number is a shocking 20%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #2: The jobless recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/">Reason #2: The jobless recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207542/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-2-the-jobless-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>employment</category><category>end of recession</category><category>jobs</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #1: Dramatic loss of wealth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Reason #1 the economy won't recover in 2010" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame2.jpg" width="160" height="213" />People not only feel poorer, they are poorer. Personal wealth will continue to decline in 2010, as home prices fall even further, fueled by a wave of 7 million homes that will go into foreclosure in the next 12 to 18 months. And foreclosure rates will remain above historical norms well beyond that. </p>
<p>More foreclosures mean more downward price pressure in the housing market. And homeowners will experience a commensurate loss of wealth as the value of their homes decline. And this is on top of all the money that had previously been lost in the stock market -- as much as 40% of accumulated consumer wealth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #1: Dramatic loss of wealth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/">Reason #1: Dramatic loss of wealth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207549/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/reason-1-dramatic-loss-of-wealth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>housing</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ten reasons the economy won't recover in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/frame1.jpg" alt="10 Reasons the Economy Won't Recover In 2010" />Think the economy is recovering? Think again.</p>
<p>Forget the noise and statistics thrown around by the politicos and pundits. We are not at the end of this recession -- we are in the middle of it.</p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/10_reasons_the_economy_won_t_recover_in_2010'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>This will not be a V-shaped recession and recovery, folks. It is a U-shaped one at best, meaning we have a while to go before things truly pick up. But, more than likely, we are dealing with a W-shaped recession, and we are near the end of the second leg ... and then down we go.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ten reasons the economy won't recover in 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/">Ten reasons the economy won't recover in 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207593/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/10-reasons-the-economy-wont-recover-in-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>end of recession</category><category>featured</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Bush throw a change-up at Yankee Stadium?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/will-bush-throw-a-change-up-at-yankee-stadium/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/will-bush-throw-a-change-up-at-yankee-stadium/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/will-bush-throw-a-change-up-at-yankee-stadium/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/schw/" rel="tag">Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/baseballpic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />There are many ironies in the fact that President George W. Bush will throw the first pitch at Major League Baseball's All-Star Game in New York. For one, <font face="Arial" size="-1">President Bush is the first managing general partner of a Major League team (the Texas Rangers) to become President of the United States.</font><font face="Arial" size="-1"><br /><br />President Franklin Roosevelt was the first to attend an All-Star Game and throw out the first pitch, starting the tradition</font>. He too had to deal with a poor economy and by the time he threw out that first ball the groundwork was being laid for World War II. President Bush has had to contend with his own war.<br /><br />While there are differing views as to whether we should have gone into Iraq and whether we should stay or get out, this will always be viewed as George's war, fair or not. And the state of our economy in 2008 will also be viewed as George's economy<em>, fair or not.</em><br /><br />The ultimate irony for me is that Yankee Stadium is scheduled to be torn apart at the end of the season. This is YANKEE Stadium and the last president to set foot in it will be George W. Bush. The stadium with the greatest heritage in baseball, the <a href="http://www.welcomescreen.aol.com/redir.adp?_e_t=ap&amp;_a_v=2.0&amp;_a_i=200100397x1205676608x1200291247&amp;_url=http%3a%2f%2fsports%2eaol%2ecom%2fmlb%2fphotos%2fyankee%2dstadium%2dmoments%3ficid%3d200100397x1205676608x1200291247" s_oidt="0" s_oid="http://www.welcomescreen.aol.com/redir.adp?_e_t=ap&amp;_a_v=2.0&amp;_a_i=200100397x1205676608x1200291247&amp;_ur">'House That Ruth Built'</a>, is going to be torn apart while our economy is also being torn apart. It is being torn out at its roots.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/will-bush-throw-a-change-up-at-yankee-stadium/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Bush throw a change-up at Yankee Stadium?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/will-bush-throw-a-change-up-at-yankee-stadium/">Will Bush throw a change-up at Yankee Stadium?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/will-bush-throw-a-change-up-at-yankee-stadium/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1256364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/will-bush-throw-a-change-up-at-yankee-stadium/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>All-Star Game</category><category>All-starGame</category><category>Baseball</category><category>Charles Schwab</category><category>CharlesSchwab</category><category>Economy</category><category>end of recession</category><category>EndOfRecession</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>GeorgeW.Bush</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan Chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>LEH</category><category>Lehman Br Holdings</category><category>LehmanBrHoldings</category><category>LUV</category><category>MER</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>MLB</category><category>SCHW</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Southwest Airlines</category><category>SouthwestAirlines</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WellsFargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
