<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's raises bar on coffee: MCD v. Starbucks grudge match?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/mcdonalds-raises-bar-on-coffee-mcd-v-starbucks-grudge-match/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/mcdonalds-raises-bar-on-coffee-mcd-v-starbucks-grudge-match/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/mcdonalds-raises-bar-on-coffee-mcd-v-starbucks-grudge-match/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/bigmac_icedcoffee.jpg" />You should have known <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's</a> Corporation (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) wouldn't take <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> Corporation's (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) movement into its territory -- with its three-dollar versions of Sausage &amp; Egg McMuffins, its doughnuts, its real estate wheeling-and-dealing not seen in McDonaldland since the 80s -- sitting down. No, McDonald's is sending the big guns through the drive-through, and they're coming out with coffee.<br /><br />This isn't just any coffee. It's "premium," far better-tasting and richer than McDonald's coffee was until a few years ago. Many say, <a href="http://mcd.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/mcdonalds-coffee-tastes-better-than-starbucks/">even better than Starbucks' own high-priced drip offering</a>. Now I'm getting ads for McDonald's iced coffee (in mocha, vanilla, and "regular" flavors) with my Big Mac -- <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mcdonalds-to-serve-changing-tastes-in/20070328135309990001?cid=403">it's a test, along with espressos and lattes</a>, that the company might expand to the rest of the U.S. soon. McDonald's is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/19/mcdonalds-targeting-starbucks-customers/">testing a "McCafe" concept </a>with baristas, flavored coffees and biscotti.<br /><br />Not only is the coffee getting better, but McDonald's is subtly beating Starbucks at its own game by providing superior customer service along with the chain's trademark speed -- you pick up your coffee at McD's drive through window already sweetened and creamed. As a friend said, "friggin convenient when you're late for your flight!"<br /><br />McDonald's USA President Don Thompson said it best: "You can't get much better profit than adding water to beans." Starbucks has thrived and grown in the past decade with just that secret, and suddenly, it's not such a competitive advantage. As McDonald's is proving, <em>anyone </em>can make coffee a little bit better, and if you have a big enough brand, maybe you can just convince the world to try your attempt. Round three may just go to the Golden Arches.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/mcdonalds-raises-bar-on-coffee-mcd-v-starbucks-grudge-match/">McDonald's raises bar on coffee: MCD v. Starbucks grudge match?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/mcdonalds-raises-bar-on-coffee-mcd-v-starbucks-grudge-match/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/862421/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/mcdonalds-raises-bar-on-coffee-mcd-v-starbucks-grudge-match/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>espresso</category><category>fast food</category><category>FastFood</category><category>mcd</category><category>mcd v sbux</category><category>mcd vs. sbux</category><category>mcdonald's vs starbucks</category><category>Mcdonald'sVsStarbucks</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>McdVs.Sbux</category><category>McdVSbux</category><category>premium coffee</category><category>PremiumCoffee</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can coffee get any hotter? Seattle spins "sexpresso"]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/lacey_bra_240.jpg" />In an area where good coffee is ubiquitous, how does one business stand apart from another? A diverse selection of low-fat bran muffins? Not for me. Free Norah Jones CD samplers? Nope. Sheer, baby-doll negligees with thigh-high boots? Sold.<br /><br />According to <em>The Seattle Times</em>, along the cluttered roadsides of Seattle's commuter towns, drive-through espresso bars are going to creative lengths to attract business, well, male business at least. These caffeinated joints feature <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003535398_coffeegirls22e.html">"bodacious" baristas</a> offering not just double macchiatos with almond biscotti, but "flirty service and revealing outfits" (including lingerie and "fetish" ensembles) at establishments with names such as Moka Girls, Bikini Espresso and Natt&eacute; Latt&eacute;. <br /><br />While drive-throughs have long been part of Starbucks Corp (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>)'s business, many independent espresso stands popped up after the state's smoking ban went into effect a year ago. Says Lori Bowden, owner of Tukwila, Washington's Cowgirls Espresso stand, owners of bars, casinos and convenience-stores at that time began renting parking lot spots to espresso stands. And while the debate rages over who started the whole Red Light District element, no one argues that the Git-R-Done nation -- who might never have entered a Starbucks -- are now frequenting their establishments many times a day.<br /><br />Offended local businesses have set up surveillance but no laws have been broken, as private parts -- including buttocks -- are always covered. Says Bowden, in spite of customer requests "there will be no 'Thong Thursdays.'"<br /><br /><em>B. Brandon Barker is the author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Operation-EMU-B-Brandon-Barker/dp/0977376338/?tag2=wwwwiselephac-20">Operation EMU</a></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/">Can coffee get any hotter? Seattle spins "sexpresso"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/740523/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barista</category><category>bodacious baristas</category><category>BodaciousBaristas</category><category>coffee</category><category>drive through</category><category>drive thru</category><category>drive-through</category><category>DriveThrough</category><category>DriveThru</category><category>espresso</category><category>espresso stands</category><category>EspressoStands</category><category>lingerie</category><category>negligee</category><category>sbux</category><category>sex</category><category>sexy</category><category>sexy coffee</category><category>SexyCoffee</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon Barker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's coffee tastes better than Starbucks!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/mcdonalds-coffee-tastes-better-than-starbucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/mcdonalds-coffee-tastes-better-than-starbucks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/mcdonalds-coffee-tastes-better-than-starbucks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" height="211" alt="The Winner" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/coffee200.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />According to one <a href="http://www.canada.com/reginaleaderpost/news/canada_world/story.html?id=9af404dd-0e49-4fee-bc57-01be823174ff">taste test</a> performed among four experts in Canada, anyway. Yes, that's four coffee aficionados living in the Toronto area and working in the gourmet coffee field. <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Canadian Business </span>magazine conducted blind taste tests comparing various drip premium coffees: McDonald's Corporation (NYSE: <a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>), Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ: <a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>), a brand called Tim Horton's, and a new Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: <a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">KO</a>) coffee called "Far Coast." <br /><br />That's the order in which they ranked: McDonald's "Caf&eacute; Roast" blend being the winner with 6.5 "cups" -- as they called their ratings points. Starbucks came in a not-that-close second with 5 cups, Tim Horton's right on its heels with 4, and Far Coast dead last with one single point. And that's only because two judges were nice enough to award it a half point, while the others handed it a goose egg. <br /><br />Coke <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11101825/">introduced</a> Far Coast to market to fast food outlets and convenience stores within the last year. </p>
<p><strong>More news about Starbucks:<br /></strong>-- <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/starbucks-giving-nyc-warm-food-manhattanites-second-class-citiz/">Starbucks giving warm breakfast to Manhattanites</a><br />-- <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/cramer-now-says-starbucks-going-to-50/">Jim Cramer says Starbucks is worth $50 a share</a><br />-- <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/14/starbucks-the-real-estate-strategy-buying-houses-in-sbux-fave/">Starbucks, the real estate strategy</a><br />-- <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/17/barista-machines-recalled-for-fire-hazard/">Baristas recalled?</a></p>
<p><strong>More news about McDonald's:</strong><br />-- <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/22/beef-sex-mcdonalds-makes-unshocking-discovery-in-china/">Beef = sex in China</a><br />-- <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/21/breakfast-all-day-why-a-health-nut-might-buy-mcdonalds/">Breakfast all day is healthy</a><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/mcdonalds-coffee-tastes-better-than-starbucks/">McDonald's coffee tastes better than Starbucks!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/mcdonalds-coffee-tastes-better-than-starbucks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/677655/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/mcdonalds-coffee-tastes-better-than-starbucks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>canada</category><category>canadian business</category><category>CanadianBusiness</category><category>coffee</category><category>coke</category><category>espresso</category><category>far coast</category><category>FarCoast</category><category>gourmet coffee</category><category>GourmetCoffee</category><category>ko</category><category>mcd</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks sued over coupon -- the blogosphere reacts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img width="140" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="140" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/starbucksbw.gif" alt="Starbucks" id="vimage_1" />At <a href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/_/2006/09/starbucks_sued_.html">Starbucks Gossip bloggers and commentators are talking</a> about Friday's $114 million suit against Starbucks (<a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=" title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance">SBUX</a>) for the coupon debacle, which my <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/30/starbucks-giving-away-iced-coffee-oops/">colleague Sarah Gilbert reported on right here</a>. A class-action suit was probably inevitable given our litigious age and the company's profile. Starbucks has given the fact that the coupons were <a href="http://www.mediabuyerplanner.com/2006/08/31/starbucks_promo_goes_gangbuster/">alterted and distributed beyond their intended scope</a>, and the reason for cancelling the promotion.<br /><br />Comments at <a href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/">Starbucks Gossip</a> are running about 2/3rds against the suit (by my very rough estimate) last time I checked. Some posters sound bemused over the whole mess, while others are outraged. P. Scranton said, "No wonder attorneys are held in such low esteem." Some people did write in to express feeling "betrayed" by Starbucks -- angry that a large company should get away with pulling back this freebie without some sort of penalty. Starbucks (some consumers seem to feel, anyway) picked up the ball and went home after too many people decided to play. JavaGrrl, who identifies herself as a longtime employee, says that the company was "embarrassed" (all caps) by the entire episode. For me, that embarrassment is punishment enough. I don't want to see a suit go forward, the stock fall, and the costs passed on to the consumer. <br /><br />The comment that had the funniest, and to me, the most sensible take on the entire matter was this from DeusX: "I think I will be suing my ex-gf of ten years ago, I have a 'good for one free backrub' coupon signed by her with no expiration date."<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/">Starbucks sued over coupon -- the blogosphere reacts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/666164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogging</category><category>blogs</category><category>coffee</category><category>coupons</category><category>espresso</category><category>food and drink</category><category>FoodAndDrink</category><category>frappucino</category><category>gourmet</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>starbucks gossip</category><category>StarbucksGossip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks podcasting commercial]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img id="vimage_1" height="150" alt="Coffee tasting" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/cuppinglineuplg.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Starbucks (<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>) has begun a series of podcasts <span class="copygray"><a href="http://www.starbucks.com/ourcoffees/coffeeconversations.asp?category%5Fname=Coffee+Conversations&amp;cookie%5Ftest=1">dedicated to the exploration and appreciation of coffee</a>. I've just listened to the first one so that you don't have to! Using podcasts (and blogging) as tools to educate your consumer base is nothing new, and Starbucks actually does very little of it. This series is tied in with the company's 35th anniversary, and will run weekly this month. Yep -- that "fad" company from Seattle is, in a couple incarnations anyway, thirty-five years old. <br /><br />They've run a short "promocast" of this series, that Frank Barnako of MarketWatch listened to and described as "<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7BE56A8544-AFB0-4F8C-970C-1214EDF61B05%7D&amp;keyword=">lukewarm</a>." So I ignored that and dove right into the full-length premiere today. Well, full-length turns out to be only twelve minutes long, so I don't know how much time I'll be saving you here. Say, nine minutes, if you read fairly fast, but every little bit helps ... <br /></span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks podcasting commercial</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/">Starbucks podcasting commercial</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/664304/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>espresso</category><category>food and drink</category><category>FoodAndDrink</category><category>gourmet</category><category>podcast</category><category>review</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks employee unionizing effort spread]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-employee-unionizing-effort-spread/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-employee-unionizing-effort-spread/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-employee-unionizing-effort-spread/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/starbucks_sunset.jpg" alt="starbucks at sunset" id="vimage_1" />I've blogged<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/09/union-organizer-to-appeal-starbucks-firing/"> previously</a> about unionization efforts by Starbucks (<a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=" title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance">SBUX</a>) retail employees (baristas <strike>and store-manager-level personnel</strike>) in New York City. Efforts are underway elsewhere too. In Chicago workers in a <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/nearwest/chi-0609040092sep04,1,6816886.story?coll=chi-newslocalnearwest-hed&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true">Logan Square store declared</a> their wish to be represented by the IWW just before the Labor Day holiday weekend. <a href="http://www.starbucksunion.org/">The IWW</a> is the "wobblies" -- a historically important union prior to the first world war, but hardly the Teamsters. However, a branch of the Teamsters: the Amalgamated Lithographers of America <a href="http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=2006082905160994">issued a press release in protest</a> of the firing of an IWW member in NYC. Leaders in the Logan's Square unionization effort state they feel they should be paid $10 an hour -- which is a nice round number -- and are paid $7.50 an hour now. Most Starbucks employees are eligible for discount stock purchases and grants, but unionized employees in Canada, for example, are not eligible for this benefit. So that's a trade-off to consider. <br /><br />Rarely do companies readily give over, or willingly share, a degree of control with a collective bargaining unit. Starbucks probably feels that the company offers competitive wages. As a pioneer in providing (at least some degree) of medical benefits to part-timers, management may even feel resentful of any implication that its employees need unions. Starbucks' stated position is that it does not discourage unionizing efforts -- which legally it would have to say anyway, so I put no stake either way in that claim. <br /><br />Whether these union efforts will factor into the decision making process for investors, I can't say for certain, but frankly I doubt it. At this point most of the information I read about this effort comes from union websites, with an occasional mention in the popular press about an planned event, such as the Logan Square declaration. Retailers like Starbucks operate on such a thin margin that -- were Starbucks to become widely unionized -- there would be some transfer of money into union dues, but any significant increase in pay or benefits would result in the need to cut overall staff, something a union would not be likely to tolerate. <br /><br /><em>Michael Canfield is a private investor, a business and media writer, living in Seattle. He </em><em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/about-the-stock-bloggers-michael-canfield/">doesn't own stock</a> in Starbucks. </em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-employee-unionizing-effort-spread/">Starbucks employee unionizing effort spread</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-employee-unionizing-effort-spread/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/664282/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-employee-unionizing-effort-spread/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chicago</category><category>coffee</category><category>espresso</category><category>IWWO</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>stocks</category><category>unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks' reports 5% sales increase for August - blip or trend?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img id="vimage_2" alt="starbucks in august" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/starbucks_cookie.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Starbucks (<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>) retail sales disappointed in July, and analysts predicted August increases to be somewhere in the 4-5% range. Most predicted closer to 4%.<br /><br />Today Starbucks reported retails <span class="news_story">revenue of $617M for August -- a not-so-shabby<a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=OBR&amp;Date=20060831&amp;ID=5987342"> 5% increase</a>. It's a</span> little early to tell whether we can identify a tightening (or loosening) of consumer budgets affecting discretionary spending. Analysts are <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/30/AR2006083001405.html">waiting and watching</a> SBUX, which, I see from my googling daily, is one very popular benchmark that economists and financial analyst love to use to gauge this kind of spending. Starbucks <a href="http://www.newratings.com/analyst_news/article_1356200.html">maintained its "buy"</a> earlier this week from Dan Geiman of McAdams Wright Ragen.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/">Starbucks' reports 5% sales increase for August - blip or trend?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/662114/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>earnings report</category><category>EarningsReport</category><category>espresso</category><category>frappucino</category><category>gourmet</category><category>retail</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>stock analysis</category><category>StockAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Judge reduces award amount in Starbucks burn suit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/judge-reduces-award-amount-in-starbucks-burn-suit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/judge-reduces-award-amount-in-starbucks-burn-suit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/judge-reduces-award-amount-in-starbucks-burn-suit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="watch out, the coffee's hot" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/starbucks_incar.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />A judge in New York City ruled that jury-awarded damages of $300,000 against Starbucks (<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>) for spilled coffee on a woman's foot <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/15/news/starbucks.reut/index.htm?section=money_latest">were excessive</a>. The spill or splash, or whatever, caused a two-inch burn, and internal damage that impacts the plaintiff's ballet dancing, her experts testified. We've all heard of these suits -- I think the first was against McDonald's. The judge refused to set aside the verdict or give Starbucks a new trial. He 'll determine what damages to award after an upcoming settlement conference by parties. <br /><br />My question is, who has the time to bring these types of suits? Once attorney fees are taken out, and the cost of one's own time factored in, the payday can't be that much. Sad really. I doubt lawsuits of this type factor into investors decisions, certainly not suits that entail money damages in the range we're talking about in this case. <br /><br /><em>Michael Canfield is a private investor, a business and media writer, living in Seattle. He </em><em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/about-the-stock-bloggers-michael-canfield/">doesn't own stock</a> in Starbucks. </em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/judge-reduces-award-amount-in-starbucks-burn-suit/">Judge reduces award amount in Starbucks burn suit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/08/15/news/starbucks.reut/index.htm?section=money_latest>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/judge-reduces-award-amount-in-starbucks-burn-suit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/654989/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/16/judge-reduces-award-amount-in-starbucks-burn-suit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>espresso</category><category>gourmet coffee</category><category>GourmetCoffee</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>retail</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks and 'luxury spending' debate in Korea]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/starbucks-and-luxury-spending-debate-in-korea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/starbucks-and-luxury-spending-debate-in-korea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/starbucks-and-luxury-spending-debate-in-korea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" height="282" alt="Escalator" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/483951_escalators.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Earlier <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/economy-squeezes-rich-starbucks-whole-foods-falter-burger-kin/">Sarah Gilbert discussed</a> the economic squeeze that could mean trouble for Starbucks (<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>) and other retailers of premium-priced gourmet items. <a href="http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200608/kt2006080618315711960.htm"><em>The Korean Times</em> reports on</a> a debate that is forming in the country over this type of spending, which for better or worse, Starbucks and the "Starbucks experience" seems to typify in many minds. Becoming a target is part-and-parcel of extraordinary success in branding. <br /><br />Throughout Asia, rushing through a metropolis Starbucks in hand can be seen as a way to tap into a feeling a sophistication and the idea that one is on globalization's winning team. This is part of a lifestyle called "<font class="article">toenjang-nyo" in Korean cyberspace, according to the rather admonishingly-toned <em>Korean Times</em> story by reporter </font><font class="article">Park Chung-a (linked above) -- at least, it's called so, when the this practice pertains to young professional or college-age women.<br /><br /></font><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/starbucks-and-luxury-spending-debate-in-korea/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks and 'luxury spending' debate in Korea</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/starbucks-and-luxury-spending-debate-in-korea/">Starbucks and 'luxury spending' debate in Korea</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200608/kt2006080618315711960.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/starbucks-and-luxury-spending-debate-in-korea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/651916/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/starbucks-and-luxury-spending-debate-in-korea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee drinks</category><category>CoffeeDrinks</category><category>espresso</category><category>globalization</category><category>gourmet coffee</category><category>GourmetCoffee</category><category>sbux</category><category>south korea</category><category>SouthKorea</category><category>starbucks asia</category><category>starbucks korea</category><category>StarbucksAsia</category><category>StarbucksKorea</category><category>toenjang-nyo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Recommended reading: Starbucks Gossip Blog]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/recommended-reading-starbucks-gossip-blog/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/recommended-reading-starbucks-gossip-blog/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/recommended-reading-starbucks-gossip-blog/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><a title="Starbucks Gossip" href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/_/"><img id="vimage_1" alt="Starbucks Logo, Green" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/starbuckslogosmall.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Starbucks Gossip</a> is an attractive and highly active blog "monitoring America's favorite drug dealer" as they word it. Unaffiliated with the Seattle corporation (<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>), the blog presents company "partners" (employees), as well as customers both frustrated and pollyanna-ish, with a chance drop by and mix it up over Jim Romenesko's imaginative and provocative posts. Commentators tend to get lengthy and rather confrontational,&nbsp; as the great <a title="Starbucks Gossip: Tipping debate: How much should you tip for a cup of coffee?" href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/_/2004/08/tipping_debate_.html">tipping debate</a> shows. That post originally went up in 2004 and still gets new comments today. Another interesting thread is this <a title="Starbucks Gossip: Question for Starbucks employees: Do you feel obligated to acknowledge customers in non-work settings?" href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/_/2006/05/question_for_st.html">question for Starbucks employees: Do you feel obligated to acknowledge customers in non-work settings?</a><br /><br />A fun and valuable site for investors and prospective investors who want the skinny on what Starbucks employees are thinking and saying outside the workplace -- as well as what consumer/addicts want cyberspace to know about their favorite (or favorite <em>to hate</em>)&nbsp; friendly-neighborhood, international-behemoth, <a title="The Third Place - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Place">Third Place</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/recommended-reading-starbucks-gossip-blog/">Recommended reading: Starbucks Gossip Blog</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/recommended-reading-starbucks-gossip-blog/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/641321/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/recommended-reading-starbucks-gossip-blog/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>espresso</category><category>rumors</category><category>starbucks blog</category><category>starbucks gossip</category><category>starbucks partner gossip</category><category>StarbucksBlog</category><category>StarbucksGossip</category><category>StarbucksPartnerGossip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Group of SBUX NYC baristas proud to be Union]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/01/group-of-sbux-nyc-baristas-proud-to-be-union/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/01/group-of-sbux-nyc-baristas-proud-to-be-union/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/01/group-of-sbux-nyc-baristas-proud-to-be-union/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/starbucksbw.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Friday mid-afternoon at their store location, a group Starbucks [<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=USA&amp;pid=&amp;tabs=quotesandnews&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=">SBUX</a>] espresso-pullers made known their membership in the <a title="Starbucks Union | IWW Starbucks Workers Union" href="http://www.starbucksunion.org/">IWW Workers Union</a> according to a <a title="New York's Premier Alternative Newspaper. Arts, Music, Food, Movies and Opinion" href="http://www.nypress.com/19/25/informationagent/agent4.cfm">New York Press report</a>. The public declaration was accompanied by a list of demands. The article quotes Daniel Gross, barista and union organizer, saying the group's main three concers are "a living wage, secure hours of 30 or more per week and an end to the anti-union campaign."&nbsp; Customers were not served while the demands were being presented.<br /><br />Starbucks has a one page paper stating its position toward (and opposition to) unionizing in its U.S. locations. I found it on the <a title="Corporate Social Responsibility" href="http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/csr.asp">Corporate Social Responsibility</a> section of the co.'s website as a pdf, dated 05 Dec 2005. (The Starbucks website has gone all pdf happy, btw -- even finding the calorie count of a white chocolate mocha requires downloading a pdf file). The doc claims the company does not "retaliate against workers interested in unionizing" and declares the company's belief that "that the direct employment relationship which we currently have with our partners is the best way to help ensure a great work environment" and that no "third party" such as a union is needed. <br /><br />A note on terminology: Starbucks calls all its workers "partners" whether management or hourly. Probably needless to say, the IWW website terms baristas and other hourly workers as&nbsp; "employees" distinct from management. As Paul Williams <a href="http://www.idea-sandbox.com/blog/2006/06/starbucks_first_employees_1.html">demonstrates,</a> current and former Starbucks workers can become quite passionate about their relationship with the company.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/01/group-of-sbux-nyc-baristas-proud-to-be-union/">Group of SBUX NYC baristas proud to be Union</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/01/group-of-sbux-nyc-baristas-proud-to-be-union/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/638905/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/01/group-of-sbux-nyc-baristas-proud-to-be-union/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>espresso</category><category>IWW</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Starbucks</category><category>Starbucks Union</category><category>StarbucksUnion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:24:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
