<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Google sued 'for the children' in PR campaign by Long Island politico]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p>Can you say "publicity"? Evidently, that's all Jeffrey Toback, a member of the Nassau County (Long Island)legislature knows. He's suing Google <em>for the children</em>, claiming that the <ahref="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GOOGLE_CHILD_PORN_SUIT?SITE=CADIU&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">company'ssearch engine promotes paid ads for child pornography companies</a> [*cough* <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/">EVIL!</a>*cough*].<br /><br />Naturally, Google says that it is <em>not</em> "<span class="body">the largest and mostefficient facilitator and distributor of child pornography in th world." And that this is just a publicity stunt.What? No, not really?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060505/0112200.shtml">Mike from Techdirtweighs in</a>, explaining that "the law here is </span> extremely clear: a service provider is not directlyresponsible for what people do on their platform" and calling the lawsuit "ridiculous" and "amisunderstanding both of the law and how Google works." Ridiculous it may be, but Jeffrey Toback's name is oneveryone's lips today. Investors evidently agree with Mike; the <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=NAS&amp;sym=E%3ANAS%3AGOOG&amp;from=view_symbol">stock is up$1.50 in intraday trading</a>, to $396.25.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/">Google sued 'for the children' in PR campaign by Long Island politico</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 May 2006 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060505/0112200.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/615308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>child porn</category><category>child pornography</category><category>ChildPorn</category><category>ChildPornography</category><category>do no evil</category><category>DoNoEvil</category><category>evil</category><category>evil empire</category><category>EvilEmpire</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>google evil</category><category>GoogleEvil</category><category>jeffrey toback</category><category>JeffreyToback</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>long island</category><category>long island ny</category><category>LongIsland</category><category>LongIslandNy</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>nassau county</category><category>NassauCounty</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>ny</category><category>porn</category><category>pornography</category><category>publicity</category><category>publicity stunt</category><category>PublicityStunt</category><category>toback</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Google doing evil by profiting from typos?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/is-google-doing-evil-by-profiting-from-typos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/is-google-doing-evil-by-profiting-from-typos/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/is-google-doing-evil-by-profiting-from-typos/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/opb_search.jpg"alt="opb.com" />As long as I've been surfing eBay, I've been in on the dirty little not-so-secret that many of youshare: typos are the way to go if you want to save money. There's even a <a href="http://www.fatfingers.com/">searchengine</a> devoted to it.<br /><br />I'm not the only former spelling bee champ exploiting the less fortoonat. Googlemakes money on typos too, by selling ads that appear on sites like nyrimes.com, ebbay.com, and OPB.com. Google insiststhat it's in the clear legally - after all, no one is confused, thinking that "OPB.com" really <em>is</em>Oregon Public Broadcasting's non-profit news site when it he arrives at the ad-filled site.<br /><br />Sure. We know.None of us are total, complete dolts, no matter how poor our spelling or slippery our keyboard. But what we<em> do</em>know is that this seems a bit underhanded. And profiting from that? Harvard researcher Ben Edelman says that seems tofly in the face of their motto: "Do no evil," in <ahref="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/29/AR2006042900279.html?sub=AR">this <em>WashingtonPost</em> article</a> [registration required].<br /><br />More evidence that Google's<ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/"> the nextevil empire</a>. Stay tuned...<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/is-google-doing-evil-by-profiting-from-typos/">Is Google doing evil by profiting from typos?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 09:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/29/AR2006042900279.html?sub=AR>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/is-google-doing-evil-by-profiting-from-typos/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/613581/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/is-google-doing-evil-by-profiting-from-typos/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben edelman</category><category>BenEdelman</category><category>do not evil</category><category>DoNotEvil</category><category>ebay</category><category>edelman</category><category>evil</category><category>evil empire</category><category>EvilEmpire</category><category>fat fingers</category><category>FatFingers</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>google ad</category><category>google ads</category><category>google advertising</category><category>google is evil</category><category>GoogleAd</category><category>GoogleAds</category><category>GoogleAdvertising</category><category>GoogleIsEvil</category><category>harvard</category><category>misspell</category><category>misspelled</category><category>misspelled sites</category><category>MisspelledSites</category><category>misspelling</category><category>opb</category><category>opb.com</category><category>profiting from typo</category><category>ProfitingFromTypo</category><category>the next evil empire</category><category>TheNextEvilEmpire</category><category>typo</category><category>typo profit</category><category>TypoProfit</category><category>typos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 09:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If eBay partners with Microsoft, who will be the evil empire?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p>With eBay <ahref="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/">rumored to betalking to Microsoft or Yahoo! about creating a partnership</a> in order to face off the considerable threat of Googleand <ahref="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/12/microsoft-software-concert-tickets-and-now-porn-for-your-ipod/">Applelaunching Microsoft software on its platform</a>, it's almost enough to make you wonder if Bill Gates'competition-stifling company might be losing its reputation as The Evil Empire.<br /><br />After all, as I discussedwith my friendly neighborhood database guy in the coffee shop today: Google's whole schtick is <em>don't be evil</em>.But how can they not be evil if they're positioned to take over the world? Google's in everything these days, fromoperating systems to email to <ahref="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/17/google-one-step-closer-to-portal-launches-online-calendar-appl/">calendars</a>.They're a search company, they're a portal, they're an online superstore, they're the last word in clean and simplesoftware.<br /><br />But someone has to be evil, right? Some company has to be the lumbering giant about whose feettiny, nimble startups hop and nibble, and against which the up-and-coming titans war. For a decade or more now, it'sbeen Microsoft. I don't know how I'd react to a world in which Microsoft was one of the good guys. How 'bout you?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/">If eBay partners with Microsoft, who will be the evil empire?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/611497/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appl</category><category>apple</category><category>evil empire</category><category>EvilEmpire</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft evil</category><category>MicrosoftEvil</category><category>msft</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
