<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Denny's Shareholder Files Preliminary Proxy Statement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/16/dennys-shareholder-files-preliminary-proxy-statement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/16/dennys-shareholder-files-preliminary-proxy-statement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/16/dennys-shareholder-files-preliminary-proxy-statement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/dennyslogo.jpg"  alt="" />The Committee to Enhance Denny's Corporation (<a href="javascript:void(0);/*1268766973453*/">DENN</a>), which is a group created by investors Oak Street Capital Management, and Dash Acquisitions, has filed a preliminary proxy statement that marks the beginning of an effort to shake up the company's board of directors -- and increase shareholder value.
<p>The <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/852772/000092189510000340/prec14a207878002_03152010.htm">proxy statement filed with SEC</a> calls out the company's management, board of directors, track record, executive compensation, and overall failure as evidenced by the company's poor share price.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/16/dennys-shareholder-files-preliminary-proxy-statement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Denny's Shareholder Files Preliminary Proxy Statement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/16/dennys-shareholder-files-preliminary-proxy-statement/">Denny's Shareholder Files Preliminary Proxy Statement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/16/dennys-shareholder-files-preliminary-proxy-statement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19402007/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/16/dennys-shareholder-files-preliminary-proxy-statement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>committee to enhance dennys</category><category>dennys</category><category>executive pay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sec</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pay czar may cave after AIG execs threaten to quit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/pay-czar-may-cave-after-aig-execs-threaten-to-quit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/pay-czar-may-cave-after-aig-execs-threaten-to-quit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/pay-czar-may-cave-after-aig-execs-threaten-to-quit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/aig-200x150.jpg" />During the past year, there's been no shortage of discussion about executive pay at American International Group (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) -- and the deluge continues. CEO Robert Benmosche reportedly <a href="http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091122/REG/311229985/1029/INSURANCE">threatened to walk</a> last month over frustrations with the Obama administration's pay caps, but was persuaded to stay by the company's board.</p>
<p>Apparently, Benmosche's maneuver inspired five other AIG execs to issue similar threats, with the group warning last week that they might walk if pay czar Kenneth Feinberg gets too handsy with their compensation packages.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/pay-czar-may-cave-after-aig-execs-threaten-to-quit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pay czar may cave after AIG execs threaten to quit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/pay-czar-may-cave-after-aig-execs-threaten-to-quit/">Pay czar may cave after AIG execs threaten to quit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/pay-czar-may-cave-after-aig-execs-threaten-to-quit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19269782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/08/pay-czar-may-cave-after-aig-execs-threaten-to-quit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>American International Group</category><category>executive pay</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kenneth Feinberg</category><category>pay czar</category><category>PayCzar</category><category>Robert Benmosche</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner attacks bank bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/geither.jpg" />U.S. Treasury Secretary, Geithner, was <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/dec2009/db2009124_675445.htm">severely critical of excessive bank bonuses</a>. In a recent interview he said, "We want to see fundamental constraints on how senior executives are paid at these institutions."</p>
<p>Geithner has been under fire for his actions during the bank bailouts of last year. He defended himself by saying: "The entire U.S. financial system and all the major firms in the country, and even small banks across the country, were at that moment at the middle of a classic run, a classic bank run."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner attacks bank bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/">U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner attacks bank bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/dec2009/db2009124_675445.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19266690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/07/u-s-treasury-secretary-geithner-attacks-bank-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonus</category><category>executive pay</category><category>geithner</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs discusses pay with major investors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" />Brokerage firm Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) has started <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703735004574572363440861826.html">meeting its major investors</a> in an attempt to stop criticism over its record compensation, the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reported. Think this is a bit of overkill? Not when the average GS employee is set to earn $700,000 this year (how do I sign up for that gig?). These meetings are the first of their kind and are expected to continue for several more weeks. The Wall Street firm is defending its pay, especially in the wake of the economic crisis that some contend it partially behind. <br /><br />GS is trying to win support for its compensation packages, which is why the company is going to the shareholders. These investors are the actual owners of the firm and hold the power to change the company's compensation structure. Of course, employees and executives are hoping there would be no change, and the campaigning is heavy. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs discusses pay with major investors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/">Goldman Sachs discusses pay with major investors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19263483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/03/goldman-sachs-discusses-pay-with-major-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks CEO gives himself $1.3 million: So that's why coffee costs so much]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/starbucks-200a0929.jpg" alt="" />I have had my problem with Starbucks (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) CEO Howard "Schultzie" Schultz in the past, but his latest little stunt has really ticked me off. </p>
<p>First things first, I will enjoy the occasional cup of Starbucks coffee, but the price has put a venti mocha-frappa-latte-chino out of my budget so I have started making my own at home. The company's product is good, but its competitors -- namely McDonald's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) and Dunkin' Donuts -- offer a comparable product at a fraction of the price. I have long thought that Starbucks' saturation business model has been its biggest fault, with Schultzie's leadership running a close second.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks CEO gives himself $1.3 million: So that's why coffee costs so much</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/">Starbucks CEO gives himself $1.3 million: So that's why coffee costs so much</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247636/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/starbucks-ceo-gives-himself-1-3-million-so-thats-why-coffee-c/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>caffeine</category><category>coffee</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executives</category><category>featured</category><category>Howard Schultz</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEO turnover down, not out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" alt="" />It's still a tough time to be a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CEO/">CEO</a>. In October, 89 top dogs moved on (by choice   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/CEO_turnover_Down_but_not_out'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>    or not). Though this is 15% lower than the 105 in September and 29% off the whopping 125 CEOs who turned over a year earlier, it's still a sign that "stability" doesn't equal "recovery."
<p>The latest study that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a> revealed to <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a></em> reports that October was the eighth month this year in which CEO turnover was down year-over-year. Through the end of last month, 1,028 CEO positions changed hands -- down 18% from the 1,257 by the same point in 2008. In fact, the tally for the first 10 months of 2009 is the lowest since 2004, when the big office found only 561 new inhabitants. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/financialindustry/">financial industry</a> remains the toughest place for CEOs, with 19 leaving the job last month. Even though the situation has gotten easier, this industry still has the highest turnover. For the year, approximately 10% of all CEO departures (106) have been in the financial sector. "The financial industry is still incredibly volatile, as both October and September saw major announcements from leading companies including <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and last month's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bankruptcy/">bankruptcy</a> of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CITGroup/">CIT Group</a>, which led to the exit of CEO <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/JeffreyPeek/">Jeffrey Peek</a>," John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas, says. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CEO turnover down, not out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/">CEO turnover down, not out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235752/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceo compensation</category><category>ceo pay</category><category>ceos</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>cit group</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>financial industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jeffrey peek</category><category>JeffreyPeek</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>jpmorganchasejpm</category><category>turnover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="146" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/billgates.jpg" alt="" />It's easy to save the world when you've already taken care of yourself. But, we rely on these mavericks -- the wealthy who realize they can make a difference -- to do what we cannot on our own. So, it comes as a relief that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BillGates/">Bill Gates</a>, founder of Microsoft (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) believes <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/executivecompensation/">executive compensation</a> is still too high. </p>
<div id="imageResults" style="display: block;"> </div>
<p>It's a murky topic, and some forms of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/regulation/">regulation</a>, Gates believes, won't help. In a discussion on philanthropy at the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/92ndStreetY/">92nd Street Y</a> in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Manhattan/">Manhattan</a>, where many of the people Gates criticized send their kids for early education, the former CEO and still rich guy cites the $1 million executive <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/salarycap/">salary cap</a> required by law in 1993 as a big mistake. While compensation has to be controlled,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112"> he believes this measure backfired and thinks that other, similar efforts are doomed to fail now</a>. </p>
<p><br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/">Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>92nd st y</category><category>92ndStY</category><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>compensation</category><category>compensation caps</category><category>CompensationCaps</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>ExecutiveSalary</category><category>gates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>manhattan</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NewYorkNewYork</category><category>philanthropy</category><category>regulation</category><category>regulations</category><category>salary cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM executives have their pay cut by the government]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/gm-executives-have-their-pay-cut-by-the-government/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/gm-executives-have-their-pay-cut-by-the-government/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/gm-executives-have-their-pay-cut-by-the-government/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-24-200cm101608.jpg" />The five most senior <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corp-1-5percent-prf-ser-d/grm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corp-1-5percent-prf-ser-d/grm/nys">GRM</a>) executives, along with the 20 next highest-paid employees, are going to see their cash compensation <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/20091022/BUSINESS07/91022057/1319/">fall $3.9 million (31%)</a> on a year-over-year basis. </p>
<p>The decision was made by the "independent master" that was appointed to set pay and stock levels for those in charge of companies that have received a majority of the funding from the federal government. GM is not on its own, as top execs at GMAC (the company's financing arm) and Chrysler will see their compensation cut as well.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/gm-executives-have-their-pay-cut-by-the-government/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM executives have their pay cut by the government</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/gm-executives-have-their-pay-cut-by-the-government/">GM executives have their pay cut by the government</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/gm-executives-have-their-pay-cut-by-the-government/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19207208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/gm-executives-have-their-pay-cut-by-the-government/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>executive pay</category><category>featured</category><category>Fritz Henderson</category><category>general motors</category><category>GM</category><category>GMAC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pay czar</category><category>pay regulation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[White House tones down executive pay rhetoric]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/white-house-tones-down-executive-pay-rhetoric/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/white-house-tones-down-executive-pay-rhetoric/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/white-house-tones-down-executive-pay-rhetoric/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/geithner_obama_220.jpg" /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125590805147593171.html#mod=todays_us_page_one"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reports</a> (subscription required) that "Administration officials on Sunday criticized Wall Street banks over their high compensation packages and their lobbying against plans to tighten financial regulations. But the administration's tone appeared muted compared with attacks made earlier in this year, as Democrats -- with an eye toward the 2010 midterm elections -- seek to put a positive spin on recent economic developments."</p>
<p>It's easy to understand why the Democrats are toning down the rhetoric: They passed an unprecedented corporate welfare package, and pledged to clamp down on compensation practices that encourage excessive risk. Then Obama appointed an executive pay czar who doesn't have any real power and, aside from begging Ken Lewis to toss back a few scraps to create the illusion of a crackdown, the Democrats have done literally nothing to curb compensation practices at firms that are existing on the taxpayer dime.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/white-house-tones-down-executive-pay-rhetoric/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>White House tones down executive pay rhetoric</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/white-house-tones-down-executive-pay-rhetoric/">White House tones down executive pay rhetoric</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/white-house-tones-down-executive-pay-rhetoric/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19200428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/white-house-tones-down-executive-pay-rhetoric/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Executive Pay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>White House</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Andrew Hall does not deserve $100 million from Citigroup]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/andrew-hall-does-not-deserve-100-million-from-citigroup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/andrew-hall-does-not-deserve-100-million-from-citigroup/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/andrew-hall-does-not-deserve-100-million-from-citigroup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/citi.jpg" />Last month my colleague Zac Bissonette posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/if-andrew-hall-made-citigroup-money-why-shouldnt-they-pay-him/#c20985611" target="_blank" title="View comment 20985611 on www.bloggingstocks.com">If Andrew Hall made Citigroup money, why shouldn't they pay him?</a> and I have been pondering this myself for a while. As a very active participant in the investment world and a supporter of capitalism, I did not want to make a knee jerk response.<br /><br />A Mr. Andrew J. Hall, who heads Phibro, LLC, a subsidiary of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) thinks he deserves $100 million for being in charge of this division because it made over a $650 million profit -- and he is lobbying very actively for the cash.<br /><br />So here is what I concluded: <strong>The $100 million payout is outrageous!!!</strong><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/andrew-hall-does-not-deserve-100-million-from-citigroup/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Andrew Hall does not deserve $100 million from Citigroup</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/andrew-hall-does-not-deserve-100-million-from-citigroup/">Andrew Hall does not deserve $100 million from Citigroup</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/andrew-hall-does-not-deserve-100-million-from-citigroup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19134054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/andrew-hall-does-not-deserve-100-million-from-citigroup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Andrew Hall</category><category>AndrewHall</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>featured</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />Who is ready for their morning dose of anger? That is what I thought this morning when I found out about the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/22/AR2009072203687.html?hpid=topnews">higher pay at some investment banks</a> following the recent bailouts. Well, let me qualify that -- it isn't necessarily higher pay, but some execs will receive the same amount as they did before the bailouts. Some Wall Street firms, enjoying improving profits are on track to "pay employees as much as, or even more than, it did in the pre-crisis days." The top six U.S. banks have set aside $74 billion to pay employees, up from $60 billion last year, according to the <em>Washington Post</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/">Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19107293/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama wants a non-binding vote on executive pay]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/obama-wants-a-non-binding-vote-on-executive-pay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/obama-wants-a-non-binding-vote-on-executive-pay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/obama-wants-a-non-binding-vote-on-executive-pay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/proxies_rosssetford_getty_20080402_240.jpg" alt="" />The Obama administration proposed legislation yesterday that would require fully-reporting publicly traded companies to give their shareholders a <em>non-binding</em> vote on executive compensation. Under the proposal, directors would have to ask shareholders what they think before going ahead and doing what they were going to do anyway.<br /><br />Administration insiders <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2009-07-17-ceo-pay_N.htm">predicted that</a> the measure would pass Congress easily, but that isn't stopping the Chamber of Commerce and the even more infamous Business Roundtable from opposing the measure.<br /><br />Why would anyone what oppose a non-binding vote is beyond me. Why are they so opposed to taking a straw poll of their shareholders to find out what they think about their pay practices? Why are they so opposed to companies soliciting the opinions of their shareholders?<br /><br />If anything, this measure doesn't go far enough. What's needed in the boardrooms of America is a revolution -- where shareholders take back their company from lazy, incompetent and just plain crooked directors who bankrupted General Motors, sent <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) onto the welfare rolls, and turned <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) into America's most degenerate gambling addict. And non-binding resolutions will lead to a non-binding revolution, which is really no revolution at all.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/obama-wants-a-non-binding-vote-on-executive-pay/">Obama wants a non-binding vote on executive pay</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2009-07-17-ceo-pay_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/obama-wants-a-non-binding-vote-on-executive-pay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19101823/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/obama-wants-a-non-binding-vote-on-executive-pay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Corporate Governance</category><category>CorporateGovernance</category><category>Executive Compensation</category><category>Executive Pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>OBama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why is Mel Karmazin getting a raise?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/why-is-mel-karmazin-getting-a-raise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/why-is-mel-karmazin-getting-a-raise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/why-is-mel-karmazin-getting-a-raise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/sirius-xm.jpg" width="175" height="175" />Over the past five years, shares of what is now <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-xm-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius XM Satellite Radio</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-xm-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) have declined from a high of $9 per share to their current price of less than 50 cents per share. Granted, most of that hasn't been CEO Mel Karmazin's fault, and he was able to stave off bankruptcy by engineering an 11th-hour loan from Liberty Media.</p>
<p>But still, is that really a track record that entitles the CEO to a raise? Mr. Karmazin's salary went from $1.25 million to $1.5 million, but that isn't even the worst part. <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124647830038982125.html#mod=todays_us_marketplace">The Wall Street Journal</a></em> (subscription required) reports that "He also gets options to purchase 120 million shares, which he can exercise at 43 cents a share."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/why-is-mel-karmazin-getting-a-raise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why is Mel Karmazin getting a raise?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/why-is-mel-karmazin-getting-a-raise/">Why is Mel Karmazin getting a raise?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/why-is-mel-karmazin-getting-a-raise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19084563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/02/why-is-mel-karmazin-getting-a-raise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive pay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mel Karmazin</category><category>SIRI</category><category>Sirius</category><category>XM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama picks a Washington lawyer to set executive pay standards]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/obama-picks-a-washington-lawyer-feinberg-to-set-executive-pay-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/obama-picks-a-washington-lawyer-feinberg-to-set-executive-pay-st/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/obama-picks-a-washington-lawyer-feinberg-to-set-executive-pay-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p>President Obama and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner have selected Washington lawyer Kenneth R. Feinberg to serve as the executive pay czar. Feinberg will be charged with setting pay standards for top executives at the seven companies that received the most bailout money.<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/11/business/11pay.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business"><br />The New York Times reports</a> that "For 80 other financial institutions that have received federal assistance, Mr. Feinberg will develop the overall compensation structure, but without setting the exact level of pay. For these 80 companies, the goal is to reduce excessive risk-taking by executives whose compensation is tied to company performance. Mr. Feinberg will also determine whether it would be in the public interest to force any executives at companies receiving assistance who might have been overpaid to return some pay."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/obama-picks-a-washington-lawyer-feinberg-to-set-executive-pay-st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama picks a Washington lawyer to set executive pay standards</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/obama-picks-a-washington-lawyer-feinberg-to-set-executive-pay-st/">Obama picks a Washington lawyer to set executive pay standards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/11/business/11pay.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/obama-picks-a-washington-lawyer-feinberg-to-set-executive-pay-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19063365/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/obama-picks-a-washington-lawyer-feinberg-to-set-executive-pay-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Executive Compensation</category><category>Executive Pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kenneth Feinberg</category><category>KennethFeinberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC may force companies to disclose pay of lower-ranking employees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/sec-may-force-companies-to-disclose-pay-of-lower-ranking-employe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/sec-may-force-companies-to-disclose-pay-of-lower-ranking-employe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/sec-may-force-companies-to-disclose-pay-of-lower-ranking-employe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/seclogo.jpg" alt="" />The Securities &amp; Exchange Commission may force public companies to disclose more information about how they compensate their lower-ranking employees, but there's a catch: They still wouldn't have to say how much they're paid.<br /><em><br />The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124397831899078781.html#mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">reports</a> (subscription required) that "The Securities and Exchange Commission plans to propose that companies disclose in general terms how they compensate lower-ranking employees, expanding disclosures for the first time beyond the executive suite."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/sec-may-force-companies-to-disclose-pay-of-lower-ranking-employe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEC may force companies to disclose pay of lower-ranking employees</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/sec-may-force-companies-to-disclose-pay-of-lower-ranking-employe/">SEC may force companies to disclose pay of lower-ranking employees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124397831899078781.html#mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/sec-may-force-companies-to-disclose-pay-of-lower-ranking-employe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19056057/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/sec-may-force-companies-to-disclose-pay-of-lower-ranking-employe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Disclosure</category><category>Executive Compensation</category><category>Executive Pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! executives receive smaller bonuses  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/yahoo-executives-receive-smaller-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/yahoo-executives-receive-smaller-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/yahoo-executives-receive-smaller-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />After the closing bell sounded yesterday afternoon, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) announced that its executives received bonuses that came in at half of their targeted range for 2008. The year was a "trying year," thanks to a falling stock price and an unsolicited takeover bid from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas"> MSFT</a>). <br /><br />As for the specific payouts, former President Sue Decker (who departed YHOO in January) received only $600,000 in bonuses for 2008. This payment does not include YHOO's payment of $23,000 for Decker's "car services" during the year. YHOO's CFO Blake Jorgensen (who will depart when the company finds a replacement) received $250,000 in bonuses during the year.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/yahoo-executives-receive-smaller-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! executives receive smaller bonuses  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/yahoo-executives-receive-smaller-bonuses/">Yahoo! executives receive smaller bonuses  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 May 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/yahoo-executives-receive-smaller-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1533601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/yahoo-executives-receive-smaller-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive bonuses</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutiveBonuses</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>failed takeover</category><category>FailedTakeover</category><category>inthenews</category><category>poor business decisions</category><category>PoorBusinessDecisions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEOs to shareholders: Do you think I'm overpaid?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ceos-to-shareholders-do-you-think-im-overpaid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ceos-to-shareholders-do-you-think-im-overpaid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ceos-to-shareholders-do-you-think-im-overpaid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/amgn-amgen-logo.jpg" alt="" />Widespread outrage over abusive executive pay practices has some companies going to unusual lengths to gain shareholder support for the way they compensate their top earners.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">Amgen, Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">AMGN</a>) has <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123879114485587659.html#mod=todays_us_opinion">invited its shareholders</a> (subscription required) to fill out a ten question online survey assessing the level of executive pay, the clarity of proxy statement disclosures related to compensation, and how well pay practices are aligned with performance and shareholder value. Other companies are instituting similar programs, and more are expected to follow.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ceos-to-shareholders-do-you-think-im-overpaid/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CEOs to shareholders: Do you think I'm overpaid?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ceos-to-shareholders-do-you-think-im-overpaid/">CEOs to shareholders: Do you think I'm overpaid?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123879114485587659.html#mod=todays_us_opinion>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ceos-to-shareholders-do-you-think-im-overpaid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1508730/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/06/ceos-to-shareholders-do-you-think-im-overpaid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CEO</category><category>Executive Compensation</category><category>Executive Pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will $1 trillion toxic waste plan enrich hedge fund billionaires?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/will-1-trillion-toxic-waste-plan-enrich-hedge-fund-billionaires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/will-1-trillion-toxic-waste-plan-enrich-hedge-fund-billionaires/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/will-1-trillion-toxic-waste-plan-enrich-hedge-fund-billionaires/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/rojer.jpg" />On Monday, the stock market rose 498 points -- a move that many attributed to the announcement over the weekend of a plan to buy <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/22/memo-to-the-president-six-reasons-to-cancel-your-1-trillion-to/">$1 trillion in toxic waste</a> that uses government loans to lure investors -- such as hedge funds -- into buying extremely risky securities. </p>
<p>That sounds like the same thing that got us into the financial crisis in the first place. It also sounds like the sort of thing that hedge funds do for a living -- and those hedge funds are making a handful of skilled people into billionaires.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/will-1-trillion-toxic-waste-plan-enrich-hedge-fund-billionaires/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will $1 trillion toxic waste plan enrich hedge fund billionaires?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/will-1-trillion-toxic-waste-plan-enrich-hedge-fund-billionaires/">Will $1 trillion toxic waste plan enrich hedge fund billionaires?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/will-1-trillion-toxic-waste-plan-enrich-hedge-fund-billionaires/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1497777/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/will-1-trillion-toxic-waste-plan-enrich-hedge-fund-billionaires/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>featured</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>James Simons</category><category>JamesSimons</category><category>John Paulson</category><category>JohnPaulson</category><category>public-private investment prog</category><category>Public-privateInvestmentProg</category><category>toxic waste</category><category>ToxicWaste</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Australia clamps down on CEO pay the right way]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/australia-clamps-down-on-ceo-pay-the-right-way/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/australia-clamps-down-on-ceo-pay-the-right-way/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/australia-clamps-down-on-ceo-pay-the-right-way/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/flag.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />While American politicians whine self-righteously about corporate governance travesties at bailed out companies they had every opportunity to extract concessions from, Australia's government is actually taking steps toward long-term improvements in executive pay practices.<br /><br />The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123740397472774903.html#mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">reports</a> that "Treasurer Wayne Swan said the center-left Labor government will amend the Corporations Act to require shareholder approval for any termination payments that exceed average annual base salary, which excludes additional compensation such as shares or stock options."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/australia-clamps-down-on-ceo-pay-the-right-way/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Australia clamps down on CEO pay the right way</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/australia-clamps-down-on-ceo-pay-the-right-way/">Australia clamps down on CEO pay the right way</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123740397472774903.html#mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/australia-clamps-down-on-ceo-pay-the-right-way/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1492318/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/australia-clamps-down-on-ceo-pay-the-right-way/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>Australia</category><category>Corporate Governance</category><category>CorporateGovernance</category><category>Executive Compensation</category><category>Executive Pay</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Golden coffins' getting a second look]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/golden-coffins-getting-a-second-look/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/golden-coffins-getting-a-second-look/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/golden-coffins-getting-a-second-look/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/233849443_dfe7787fc5_m.jpg" />With outrageous and undeserved pay packages gaining unprecedented attention at shareholder meetings this year, some activist investors are taking on one of the most egregious perks of the executive suite: "golden coffin" payments made to the estates of executives who die.<br /><br />My favorite example is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nabors-industries-ltd/nbr/nys">Nabors Industries</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nabors-industries-ltd/nbr/nys">NBR</a>) which will have to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/10/ceos-get-big-paydays-for-dying-why/">pay the estate</a> of 78-year old chairman an astounding $263 million if he kicks the bucket.<br /><br />But today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123655655871466143.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace">reports</a> (subscription required) that some activist investors and pension funds are taking on these death benefits this proxy season, with a pretty good argument: Paying executives large bonuses for dying is the polar opposite of pay-for-performance -- although a crass person might argue that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) would be in much better shape had it paid CEO Richard Wagoner a couple hundred million to take a dirt nap a few years ago.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/golden-coffins-getting-a-second-look/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Golden coffins' getting a second look</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/golden-coffins-getting-a-second-look/">'Golden coffins' getting a second look</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123655655871466143.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/golden-coffins-getting-a-second-look/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1482293/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/golden-coffins-getting-a-second-look/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Activist Investing</category><category>ActivistInvesting</category><category>Executive Pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Management</category><category>nbr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
