<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Continuing the tax protest dialogue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/continuing-the-tax-protest-dialogue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/continuing-the-tax-protest-dialogue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/continuing-the-tax-protest-dialogue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>Some BloggingStocks readers have been kind enough to comment on my blog post regarding the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/new-hampshire-couple-shouldnt-have-to-pay-taxes/">tax protest undertaken by Mr. and Mrs. Brown</a> of New Hampshire. It seems to me that in light of the many ways in which our government has mishandled issues with its citizen over the last several decades, the issue of taxation should be taking more of a front seat. Not a one of us enjoys paying taxes, but most all of us agree that they are a necessary evil. Many of us see serious inequities and abuses in the system. I'll clarify some of my positions on the subject and I'll certainly provide some fuel for debate.</p>
<p>I don't disagree that the Browns have a right to protest their taxes in their own way, but what they are doing is, in my opinion, selfish, short sighted, ill-thought-out, and probably illegal. They are acting like the little child who hurls insults at the boogie man from under the covers. They buttress their actions by claiming that the system is so completely broken that any attempt to work with it is useless. Therein lies my reason for suggesting they should go elsewhere. There are a hundred ways that the Browns could stage an open, effective, and legal protest. They, however, have chosen to hide themselves in protest. In my opinion, they are shameful, loud-mouthed cowards.</p>
<p>Does our government overtax us? You damn bet they do. When hard-working citizens reach a certain income level, their governmental tax load is between 30% and 40% of their income. It approaches 50% if you add in all the permits, licenses, user fees, and a host of other city, county, and state hidden payouts. To me this is completely unacceptable. I've been saying for quite some time that, if you consider that our incomes start with a finite 100% and the governments keep taking one additional percent after another, how long will it be before we no longer have the funds to effectively operate as a public? Even more upsetting to me than the amounts of the funds taken is the fact that we have little to no say in how that money is spent. Taxation without (effective) representation? It wouldn't be too hard to argue that such is the case.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/continuing-the-tax-protest-dialogue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Continuing the tax protest dialogue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/continuing-the-tax-protest-dialogue/">Continuing the tax protest dialogue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/continuing-the-tax-protest-dialogue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/884694/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/continuing-the-tax-protest-dialogue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fair tax</category><category>FairTax</category><category>government</category><category>Herb Kohl</category><category>HerbKohl</category><category>protest</category><category>Russ Feingold</category><category>RussFeingold</category><category>Social Security</category><category>SocialSecurity</category><category>tax</category><category>tax reform</category><category>taxation</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
