<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Kodak pulls Kodachrome in a blow to sentimentality]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/kodak-pulls-kodachrome-in-a-blow-to-sentimentality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/kodak-pulls-kodachrome-in-a-blow-to-sentimentality/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/kodak-pulls-kodachrome-in-a-blow-to-sentimentality/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/delgrossodotcom/2646620113/"><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/kodak_kodachrome_delgrossodotcom.jpg" /></a>Kodak's announcement today is evidence that sentimentality is dead in 21st century business.</p>
<p>The film world has, after all, been moping since Polaroid stopped producing its iconic instant camera film in early 2008 (take heart, Polaroid fans, "The Impossible Project" is working to reinvent instant film in an old Polaroid factory in the Netherlands). But today <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">Eastman Kodak</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>) said it was <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hNE3DMbUR1JFgMdyf_i5s4aDM9rQD98VNPP81">halting production of the complex-yet-storied Kodachrome film</a>, immediately. Not only does the product make up less than 1% of its worldwide still-picture film sales; it's extraordinarily expensive to produce.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/kodak-pulls-kodachrome-in-a-blow-to-sentimentality/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kodak pulls Kodachrome in a blow to sentimentality</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/kodak-pulls-kodachrome-in-a-blow-to-sentimentality/">Kodak pulls Kodachrome in a blow to sentimentality</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/kodak-pulls-kodachrome-in-a-blow-to-sentimentality/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19074598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/22/kodak-pulls-kodachrome-in-a-blow-to-sentimentality/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ek</category><category>featured</category><category>film</category><category>film camera</category><category>kodachrome</category><category>kodachromeretired</category><category>kodak</category><category>logistics</category><category>manufacturing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p>So, I'm still <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/ironman_head.jpg" />trying to figure out a strategy for the coming year for my portfolio. Stocks are starting to feel a little better to me, but I'm very, very cautious about timing in terms of trades. For instance, I'd rather wait until we see a substantial pullback from the recent rally before taking some of my cash on the sidelines and putting it to work. But I've got two ideas in the movie sector that I'm looking at: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>).
<p>First off, both are great companies. No, not every move they make is perfect (example: Marvel still can't properly monetize its Incredible Hulk property with a decent film). But both stocks have held up relatively well, in my opinion, during the financial implosion. Both stocks are also below their respective 52-week high's and above their respective 52-week low's. That's not a bad position to be in (although I should point out that I generally would like to get these two around their 52-week low's). But which stock has the edge?</p>
<p>Well, Marvel's shares have been strong lately. According to the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">AOL quote</a> at the time of this writing, Marvel is in the green in all time frames (year-to-date, one-month, one-year, etc.). DreamWorks Animation is in the red in a couple spots, but for the most part, it's been performing somewhat similarly to Marvel. I don't really see that much of a difference in terms of strength. Plus, both are arguably essentially equal in terms of valuation (at least in my opinion).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/">DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>film</category><category>Incredible Hulk</category><category>IncredibleHulk</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel Entertainment</category><category>MarvelEntertainment</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Thor</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lions Gate misses in Q2, but is the stock a trade?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/lions-gate-misses-in-q2-but-is-the-stock-a-trade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/lions-gate-misses-in-q2-but-is-the-stock-a-trade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/lions-gate-misses-in-q2-but-is-the-stock-a-trade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">Lions Gate Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>), whose bigger colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), publicized its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/lionsgate-reports-revenues-of-3807/rfid156948516">Q2 earnings</a> after the bell on Monday. There was good news and bad news. <br /></p>
<p>The good news was that the company narrowed its loss compared to last year's results. Lions Gate booked a net loss of $0.41 per share this year versus a net loss of $0.49 per share in the year-ago period. The bad news, however, is that the results <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN1027311320081110?rpc=33&amp;sp=true">did not meet expectations</a>. I mean, they <em>really</em> didn't meet expectations, as the call was for a loss of $0.15 per share. That's just how the movie business goes sometimes. </p>
<p>However, let's look at the cash flow, because we can find some comfort there. Operational cash flow for the quarter was positive this year instead of being negative, and free cash flow, which is the ultimate goal of any business, increased over three times to nearly $74 million. <br /></p>
<p>And I'll steer you to another positive statistic -- filmed entertainment backlog increased to what management is calling a record $456.5 million. I know, I also tend to dismiss terms like "record" when I see them in a press release, but at least in this case it refers to revenues that will ultimately be recognized down the line. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/lions-gate-misses-in-q2-but-is-the-stock-a-trade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lions Gate misses in Q2, but is the stock a trade?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/lions-gate-misses-in-q2-but-is-the-stock-a-trade/">Lions Gate misses in Q2, but is the stock a trade?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN1027311320081110?rpc=33&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/lions-gate-misses-in-q2-but-is-the-stock-a-trade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1367930/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/lions-gate-misses-in-q2-but-is-the-stock-a-trade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>film</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LGF</category><category>Lions Gate Entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>media</category><category>Saw V</category><category>SawV</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Universal</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Icahn doubles up on Lions Gate Entertainment]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/icahn-doubles-up-on-lions-gate-entertainment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/icahn-doubles-up-on-lions-gate-entertainment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/icahn-doubles-up-on-lions-gate-entertainment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/lionsgate.jpg" />When most investors are down on a stock they own, they get depressed and sell.<br /><br />Not so for Carl Icahn. Since he <a href="http://www.richardalan.com/opinion2.htm">first bought</a> shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>) back in mid-2006, the stock has fallen from around $10 per share to the current price of just over $7. Now Icahn has doubled his stake in the film house to 9.2%. Lions Gate is best-known for hit movies including "Crash" and "Saw", along with TV shows such as "Weeds" and "Mad Men." Icahn may see tremendous value in the company's library of films. <br /><br />Vice Chairman Michael Burns <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122464589844657679.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">told</a> (subscription required) <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> that "Mr. Icahn and Lions Gate seem to share a similar vision of the growing value of content as platforms increase delivery around the world."<br /><br />It'll be interesting to see if Icahn gets active in this company. He has said that he views the company as underleveraged, but current market conditions may make it tough for the company to pursue some of Icahn's favorite value-creation strategies: borrowing money to buy back stock and/or pursuing a sale or merger.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/icahn-doubles-up-on-lions-gate-entertainment/">Icahn doubles up on Lions Gate Entertainment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122464589844657679.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/icahn-doubles-up-on-lions-gate-entertainment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1349254/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/22/icahn-doubles-up-on-lions-gate-entertainment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activist investing</category><category>activist investors</category><category>ActivistInvesting</category><category>ActivistInvestors</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>entertainment</category><category>film</category><category>Inthenews</category><category>Lions Gate</category><category>LionsGate</category><category>media</category><category>movies</category><category>TV</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: Eastman Kodak battles the digital era]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-kodak-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade?icid=100214839x1206443214x1200311100">this series</a>, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.</em></p>
<p>Be honest -- when was the last time you dropped off a roll of film to be developed? If your response dates back to the 1990s, the unpleasant fate of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">Eastman Kodak Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>) probably doesn't need too much explaining. The way we take pictures and use paper has shifted drastically in the past decade, and Eastman has struggled in its attempts to keep up (with more "struggling" than "keeping up" involved, nearly every step of the way).</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At No. 11 on our list of SPX dawdlers, EK shed 80% of its value during from June 30, 1998 through June 30, 2008. The stock tapped an all-time high near $95 in early 1997; during the decade in question, the shares peaked at $88.94 in July 1998. It was to be the first in a long series of lower highs for EK as it cascaded down the charts.</p>
<p>Eastman Kodak entered 1998 with an aggressive turnaround plan. The elimination of 20% of EK's payroll was meant to help stem the tide of diminishing profits and market share for the one-time leviathan of photography; the company was floundering in the face of heightened competition from the likes of Fuji. EK also unloaded a chain of retail stores and non-core businesses, but a gradual increase in profits couldn't mask disappointing sales growth.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: Eastman Kodak battles the digital era</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/">Worst 10-year performers: Eastman Kodak battles the digital era</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/worst-10-year-performers-eastman-kodak-battles-the-digital-era/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>digital</category><category>Eastman Kodak</category><category>EastmanKodak</category><category>EK</category><category>film</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will 'The Love Guru' and 'Get Smart' avoid box office disaster?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/will-the-love-guru-and-get-smart-avoid-box-office-disaster/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/will-the-love-guru-and-get-smart-avoid-box-office-disaster/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/will-the-love-guru-and-get-smart-avoid-box-office-disaster/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/mikemyers.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Viacom Inc</a>.'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) Paramount studios, which has scored big at the box office with "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" and "Iron Man," and<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"> Time Warner Inc.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) Warner Bros, which is behind "Speed Racer," can't win them all. For example, take "The Love Guru" and "Get Smart," which open this weekend.<br /><br />Reviews for Paramount's "The Love Guru, which stars Mike Myers, are not just scathing, they are acidic. A.O. Scott of the<a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/movies/20guru.htmldpc"> New York Times </a>said, "To say that the movie is not funny is merely to affirm the obvious... No, `The Love Guru' is downright antifunny, an experience that makes you wonder if you will ever laugh again." At the <a href="http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/la-et-guru20-2008jun20,0,7442141.story">Los Angeles Times</a>, Jan Stewart argued that the movie was filled with "low blows and elephantine misfires." Mike LaSalle of the<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/19/DDLL11BAA1.DTL"> San Francisco Chronicle</a> is slightly kinder saying,<span class="georgia md" id="bodytext"> "There are whole sections when watching the movie is like being locked in the mind of a 10-year-old boy."<br /><br />Critics weren't much kinder to Warner Bros.' "Get Smart," a remake of the popular TV comedy from the 1960s. <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Newsweek's</span> David Ansen dismissed it as <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/buzzwatch/2008/06/19/buzz-links-carell-hathaway-and-what-get-smart-reviews-are-saying/?mod=googlenews_wsj">distressingly generic</a>, comments echoed by Claudia Puig of <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2008-06-18-get-smart_N.htm">USA Today.</a> To be sure, the movie has its fans, including <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080619/REVIEWS/867249699">Roger Ebert, </a>who said Steve Carrell makes an "infectious Maxwell Smart."<br /><br /></span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/will-the-love-guru-and-get-smart-avoid-box-office-disaster/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will 'The Love Guru' and 'Get Smart' avoid box office disaster?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/will-the-love-guru-and-get-smart-avoid-box-office-disaster/">Will 'The Love Guru' and 'Get Smart' avoid box office disaster?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/will-the-love-guru-and-get-smart-avoid-box-office-disaster/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1231735/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/will-the-love-guru-and-get-smart-avoid-box-office-disaster/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adam Sandler</category><category>AdamSandler</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>film</category><category>Get Smart</category><category>GetSmart</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mike Myers</category><category>MikeMyers</category><category>movies</category><category>paramount pictures</category><category>ParamountPictures</category><category>The Love Guru</category><category>TheLoveGuru</category><category>twx</category><category>via</category><category>Warner Bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Iron Man' vs. 'Indy': Preview of potential summer blockbusters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/iron-man-vs-indy-preview-of-potential-summer-blockbusters/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/iron-man-vs-indy-preview-of-potential-summer-blockbusters/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/iron-man-vs-indy-preview-of-potential-summer-blockbusters/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p>Since last year's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/">summer movie preview</a> featured mostly sequels and adaptations, this year's preview has been expanded to include more than just potential "blockbusters." The following is a chronological list of not only the most hyped film fare of the summer, but other noteworthy smaller entries, and a short commentary on each.<br /><br /><strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="middle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/iron-man-robert-downey.jpg" alt="Robert Downey in Paramount Pictures Iron Man" /><br /><br />5/2 - <em>Iron Man</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>)'s Paramount Pictures</strong><br />The first of two big <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) adaptations of the summer, the Robert Downey Jr. led <em>Iron Man</em> has been getting a ton of hype and critical acclaim. This is the second year that a comic book adaptation has kicked off the summer, following last year's <em>Spider-Man 3</em>, which grossed over $150M over its opening weekend.<br /><br /><strong>5/9 - <em>Speed Racer</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>)'s Warner Bros.</strong><br />Another big-budget adaptation of a generations-old cartoon. Last year's <em>Transformers </em>was, to my surprise, a huge success, so maybe <em>Speed Racer</em>, in the capable directing hands of the Wachowskis, can be as well.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/iron-man-vs-indy-preview-of-potential-summer-blockbusters/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Iron Man' vs. 'Indy': Preview of potential summer blockbusters</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/iron-man-vs-indy-preview-of-potential-summer-blockbusters/">'Iron Man' vs. 'Indy': Preview of potential summer blockbusters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 03 May 2008 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/iron-man-vs-indy-preview-of-potential-summer-blockbusters/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1183814/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/03/iron-man-vs-indy-preview-of-potential-summer-blockbusters/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>20th century fox</category><category>20thCenturyFox</category><category>batman</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>cinema</category><category>dark knight</category><category>DarkKnight</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>dreamworks</category><category>dwa</category><category>film</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>get smart</category><category>GetSmart</category><category>hancock</category><category>hell boy</category><category>HellBoy</category><category>incredible hulk</category><category>IncredibleHulk</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>mamma mia</category><category>MammaMia</category><category>marvel</category><category>movie</category><category>mvl</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>paramount</category><category>pineapple express</category><category>PineappleExpress</category><category>pixar</category><category>prince caspian</category><category>PrinceCaspian</category><category>sex and the city</category><category>SexAndTheCity</category><category>sisterhood of the traveling pants</category><category>SisterhoodOfTheTravelingPants</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>speed racer</category><category>SpeedRacer</category><category>the happening</category><category>theater</category><category>TheHappening</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tropic thunder</category><category>TropicThunder</category><category>twx</category><category>universal</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>wall-e</category><category>wanted</category><category>warner bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><category>x-files</category><category>zohan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Battle of the Brands: Canon vs. Kodak]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/battle-of-the-brands-canon-vs-kodak/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/battle-of-the-brands-canon-vs-kodak/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/battle-of-the-brands-canon-vs-kodak/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/battle-canon-kodak-200x267dr.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/battle-for-best-brands">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and check out other Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p>Rochester, New York-based <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">Eastman Kodak Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>) was founded in 1892, and is well known for its wide range of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kodak">photographic film products</a>; it remains to this day the largest supplier of photographic films in the world. The company played a vital role in the invention and development of the motion picture industry, setting the standard of 35 mm film.</p>
<p>But times change. In 1999, Kodak entered into the consumer inkjet photo printers market in a joint venture with manufacturer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lexmark-international-inc/lxk/nys">Lexmark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lexmark-international-inc/lxk/nys">LXK</a>). In 2004, Kodak announced it would stop producing traditional film cameras, beginning a multiyear struggle to refocus on digital photography and printing. Some of the results of that effort include the Kodak Smart Picture Frame, into which digital files are downloadable via a network connection. The Kodak Gallery is a website where users can upload photos into albums, print them out, and create mouse pads, calendars, and the like. And in 2006 Kodak announced that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/flextronics-international-ltd/flex/nas">Flextronics</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/flextronics-international-ltd/flex/nas">FLEX</a>) would manufacture and help design its digital cameras. Kodak also has long-term plans to sell ink jet printers and flat-panel displays.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/battle-of-the-brands-canon-vs-kodak/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Battle of the Brands: Canon vs. Kodak</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/battle-of-the-brands-canon-vs-kodak/">Battle of the Brands: Canon vs. Kodak</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/battle-of-the-brands-canon-vs-kodak/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1172303/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/battle-of-the-brands-canon-vs-kodak/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>battle of the brands</category><category>CAJ</category><category>cameras</category><category>Canon</category><category>digital cameras</category><category>Eastman Kodak</category><category>EK</category><category>film</category><category>FLEX</category><category>Flextronics</category><category>Kodak</category><category>Lexmark</category><category>LXK</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oscar TV ratings hit record low]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/oscar-tv-ratings-hit-record-low/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/oscar-tv-ratings-hit-record-low/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/oscar-tv-ratings-hit-record-low/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/oscarpci.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Walt Disney Co</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) executives were probably ecstatic last night after the drama <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/movies/awardsseason/25osca.html?_r=1&amp;ex=1361682000&amp;en=9b68d2a3b5df3904&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin">"No Country for Old Men,"</a> which its Miramax unit co-produced, won the best picture Oscar. Today, they must be depressed because a record-low audience witnessed the company's triumph.<br /><br />Ratings for the Oscar telecast, broadcast on the company's ABC network, were probably the lowest of the decade, according to the <a href="http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/oscar-ratings-are-way-down/">New York Times. </a>The telecast drew about 33% of people watching television, a steep decline from last year's 42%, the paper said. <br /><br />This isn't a surprise. For one thing, as the paper notes, the leading movies weren't exactly crowd pleasers. Moreover, viewers got into the habit of not watching television thanks to the recent Hollywood writers' strike. Once media habits are established, they are hard to change. Perhaps, people have got enough on their minds with the faltering economy to watch overpaid celebrities pay homage to other overpaid celebrities.<br /><br />Disney ad sales executives may be forced to give advertisers so-called make goods because of the ratings shortfall for failing to meet guarantees for viewership. ABC may be forced to give free advertising time on popular TV programs such as "Desperate Housewives" to appease angry advertisers. That may negate some of the benefit to the bottom line from "No Country's" Oscar triumph.<br /><br /><em>--Freelance writer Jonathan Berr edits the blog <a href="http://ketchupandeggs.wordpress.com">Ketchup and E</a></em><a href="javascript:void(0);/*1203969563453*/"><em>ggs.</em></a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/oscar-tv-ratings-hit-record-low/">Oscar TV ratings hit record low</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/oscar-ratings-are-way-down/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/oscar-tv-ratings-hit-record-low/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1124167/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/25/oscar-tv-ratings-hit-record-low/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>DIS</category><category>FILM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MOVIES</category><category>OSCAR</category><category>TV RATINGS</category><category>TvRatings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nicolas Cage helps give Disney a holiday present]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/24/nicolas-cage-helps-give-disney-dis-a-holiday-present/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/24/nicolas-cage-helps-give-disney-dis-a-holiday-present/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/24/nicolas-cage-helps-give-disney-dis-a-holiday-present/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/national-treasure.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">The Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DIS</a>) got a nice present today in the form of the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/cage-finds-more-box-office-gold-with-45/n20071223140509990003">nation's number one movie</a>, <em>National Treasure: Book of Secrets.<br /><br /></em>The sequel to the 2004 blockbuster, <em>National Treasure</em>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Treasure:_Book_of_Secrets"><em>National Treasure: Book of Secrets</em></a> had a monster weekend, with $45.5 million in sales. Nicolas Cage is once again the leading man in this movie, and in this thriller, Cage's character, Ben Gates, is in a struggle to clear the name of an ancestor that has been implicated in the murder of Abraham Lincoln's assassination.<br /><br />If the first installment of this series is any indication, Disney could be seeing some pretty big numbers from this movie before it is all said and done. When <em>National Treasure</em> debuted in 2004 the movie raked in $35.1 million and ended up with a total of $173 million at the box office.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/24/nicolas-cage-helps-give-disney-dis-a-holiday-present/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nicolas Cage helps give Disney a holiday present</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/24/nicolas-cage-helps-give-disney-dis-a-holiday-present/">Nicolas Cage helps give Disney a holiday present</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/24/nicolas-cage-helps-give-disney-dis-a-holiday-present/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1070342/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/24/nicolas-cage-helps-give-disney-dis-a-holiday-present/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alvin and the Chipmunks</category><category>AlvinAndTheChipmunks</category><category>Book of Secrets</category><category>BookOfSecrets</category><category>DIS</category><category>featured</category><category>film</category><category>I am Legend</category><category>IAmLegend</category><category>movies</category><category>National Treasure</category><category>National Treasure: Book of Secrets</category><category>NationalTreasure</category><category>NationalTreasure:BookOfSecrets</category><category>Nicolas Cage</category><category>NicolasCage</category><category>Walt Disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><category>Will Smith</category><category>WillSmith</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner (TWX) earnings meet expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/time-warner-earnings-meet-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/time-warner-earnings-meet-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/time-warner-earnings-meet-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) posted earnings per share of 29 cents after items, but on a normalized basis the company's <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/time-warner-profit-falls-53/story.aspx?guid=%7B06402C92%2D2A18%2D4759%2D8491%2D9F06CD337DE9%7D&amp;siteid=aolpfaolpf1">earnings were 24 cents</a>. Revenue was $11.68 billion. First Call estimates were for earnings of 24 cents on revenue of $11.36 billion.<br /><br />As far as how this compares, it really seems like the results were better than expected. Adjusted Operating Income before Depreciation and Amortization climbed 15% to $3.2 billion, reflecting double-digit increases in the Cable, Filmed Entertainment and Publishing segments, as well as a gain at the Networks segment. This growth was offset partly by a decline at AOL. Operating Income was up 29% to $2.1 billion.<br /><br />Time Warner continued its aggressive share buyback. As of November 6, 2007, the company has repurchased approximately 119 million shares for approximately $2.2 billion since its $5 billion program was announced on August 1. At existing prices, the company expects to complete at least half of the program by the time the time it reports its 2007 full-year and fourth-quarter results.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/time-warner-earnings-meet-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner (TWX) earnings meet expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/time-warner-earnings-meet-expectations/">Time Warner (TWX) earnings meet expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/time-warner-profit-falls-53/story.aspx?guid=%7B06402C92%2D2A18%2D4759%2D8491%2D9F06CD337DE9%7D&amp;siteid=aolpfaolpf1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/time-warner-earnings-meet-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1032620/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/time-warner-earnings-meet-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>entertainment</category><category>film</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>richard parsons</category><category>RichardParsons</category><category>time inc</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>twx</category><category>warner bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NBC is probably not for sale]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><img height="63" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/nbc428.jpg" width="160" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /> NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2950920920071029">made it clear</a> at a conference yesterday that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) had no interest in selling the media business. Referring to GE CEO Jeff Immelt, Zucker said, "He has said numerous times that NBCU is not for sale. It is not for sale after the Olympics." Some press reports have indicated that GE would take the big money from the sports event and then dump the business on some sucker.</p>
<p>It is odd that the head of a GE division should have to make this kind of comment at all. The head of the locomotive division probably wouldn't make comments about the future of his business. Meanwhile, NBC Universal can go on operating as usual whether Wall Street thinks it is for sale or not.</p>
<p>The argument for selling NBC is that the unit does not fit with the conglomerate's industrial and financial operations. That is true, but owning a network does mean tickets to the Super Bowl and the Oscars.</p>
<p>NBC is a $15 billion business with operating income running about $2.5 billion, making it a modest part of GE's overall earnings. Still, the business is about the size of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), which has a market cap of $21 billion and debt of $7 billion. </p>
<p>For the $28 billion enterprise value of CBS, GE would sell NBC tomorrow.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor of </em><em>247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/">NBC is probably not for sale</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2950920920071029>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1025143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/30/nbc-is-probably-not-for-sale/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>entertainment</category><category>film</category><category>ge</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jeff zucker</category><category>jeffrey immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>media</category><category>nbc tv</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcTv</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>universal studios</category><category>UniversalStudios</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hollywood freaking out over lower DVD prices, movie downloads?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/hollywood-being-freaked-out-over-declining-dvd-prices-and-movie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/hollywood-being-freaked-out-over-declining-dvd-prices-and-movie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/hollywood-being-freaked-out-over-declining-dvd-prices-and-movie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tech-for-the-rest-of-us/" rel="tag">Tech for the Rest of Us</a></p><p>Are DVDs on their way out as a way to distribute films, specials, TV shows and other video content? Although the early-adopter crowd says yes, I have my doubts. The value added into DVDs these days far outweighs the relative complexity many consumers must confront to get downloadable video content onto their living room televisions. <br /><br />Alternate audio tracks, digital surround and a plethora of extra features movie producers add to most DVDs are prized by almost every DVD fan I know. On the other hand, downloading a movie for free can be a bit of a process for the technically challenged as well as being a pain to get on that television. There are products like the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) Apple TV that takes care of this, but at a high cost. DVD players? $30 at a local retailer and you are ready to go.<br /><br />The price of DVDs has continued to come down slowly but surely, which has to cause concern for movie studios who fear margins are being eroded at the same time movie downloads threaten to lower the revenue bar even further. In an age where DVD releases are meant to make up theater revenue letdowns, the dropping of DVD prices could be seen as a threat. But movie downloads? It's hard to find one solution offered by any company that even comes close to threatening the physical DVD as distribution medium for video content.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/hollywood-being-freaked-out-over-declining-dvd-prices-and-movie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hollywood freaking out over lower DVD prices, movie downloads?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/hollywood-being-freaked-out-over-declining-dvd-prices-and-movie/">Hollywood freaking out over lower DVD prices, movie downloads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071001-dvd-markdowns-signal-desperation-in-movie-industry.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/hollywood-being-freaked-out-over-declining-dvd-prices-and-movie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1003127/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/hollywood-being-freaked-out-over-declining-dvd-prices-and-movie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>downloads</category><category>DVD</category><category>film</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>This summer was a very profitable one for box offices nationwide, with four movies grossing over $300M, and at least another nine grossing over $100M -- signaling in a big way the resurgence of the movie industry, which had been struggling for the last few years.<br /><br />The four big $300M+ winners of the summer were <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corporation (ADR)</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) 's<em>Spider-Man 3</em>, which grossed $336M in the U.S., <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom, Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>)'s Paramount's <em>Shrek the Third</em>, which grossed $320M, <em>Transformers</em>, also from Paramount, which grossed $311M, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">The Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)'s <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End</em>, which grossed $308M. <br /><br />Three of the four were third installments of well established big-budget franchises, so their success is hardly shocking, but the <em>Transformers</em> success clearly marks the start of a new blockbuster franchise (the <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/09/24/transformers-2-gets-a-release-date/">release date of the sequel</a> has been announced -- June 26, 2009). The robot-action extravaganza, which was directed by Michael Bay, was definitely a surprise, as I remarked in my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/">summer movie preview</a> that <em>Transformers</em> "has flop written all over it... there cannot possibly be enough substance in a story about alien robots that transform into vehicles to make this a hit with the general public." I was wrong -- very wrong. The movie killed at the box office, grossing over $330M on a $150M budget, and prompting a <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/08/19/extended-cut-of-transformers-hits-imax-next-month/">re-release on IMAX</a>, which opened last week.<br /><br /><em><br /></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/">'Transformers' and 'Shrek' flex muscles: A review of the summer blockbusters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/994529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/transformers-and-shrek-flex-muscles-a-eview-of-summer-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>20th century fox</category><category>20thCenturyFox</category><category>28 weeks later</category><category>28WeeksLater</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>cinema</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>evan almighty</category><category>EvanAlmighty</category><category>expire-images:2008-9-24</category><category>film</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>golden compass</category><category>GoldenCompass</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>hulk</category><category>imax</category><category>indiana jones</category><category>IndianaJones</category><category>iron man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>knocked up</category><category>KnockedUp</category><category>movie</category><category>new line cinemas</category><category>NewLineCinemas</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>paramount</category><category>pineapple express</category><category>PineappleExpress</category><category>pirates of the caribbean</category><category>PiratesOfTheCaribbean</category><category>pixar</category><category>punisher</category><category>rush hour 3</category><category>RushHour3</category><category>shrek the third</category><category>ShrekTheThird</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>spider-man 3</category><category>Spider-man3</category><category>summer</category><category>superbad</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>transformers</category><category>twx</category><category>universal</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>wall-e</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Funny Bidness -- e-cards that rock; robot spy blimp; Spiderpig hoax; a fishy spa treatment]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/25/funny-bidness-e-cards-that-rock-robot-spy-blimp-spiderpig-h/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/25/funny-bidness-e-cards-that-rock-robot-spy-blimp-spiderpig-h/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/25/funny-bidness-e-cards-that-rock-robot-spy-blimp-spiderpig-h/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/el/" rel="tag">Estee Lauder (EL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/ecard824.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" /><strong>e-card pwn</strong> -- I don't even open e-cards anymore since the spammers adopted them as a way of invading my PC, but <a href="http://www.someecards.com">someecards.com</a> has caused me to change my mind. Instead of the usual meaningless phrases like 'Thinking of you', someecards carry relevant messages, such as <br />
<ul>
    <li>Courtesy hello -- I really enjoyed awkwardly waving at you </li>
    <li>Graduation -- Congratulations on getting through the easiest part of your life </li>
    <li>Business - Just getting on your radar because I may need something from you soon </li>
</ul>
<strong><br />Robot spy blimp</strong> - According to <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/23/droid_airship_peeper_purchase/">Lewis Page of The Register</a>, the U.S. Army's $11 million order with Telford Aviation could be for the company's 30,000 cubic foot unmanned blimp, the Skybus 30K. I presume the spy blimp will be used to monitor football games and other sporting events for terrorists. You suppose the Army will offer naming rights to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Goodyear</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GT</a>)?<br /><strong><br />Spiderpig hoax</strong> - Those millions of you that have seen Fox's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp</a>, NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) <a href="http://www.simpsonsmovie.com/main.html">The Simpsons Movie</a> will remember Homer's pet, Spiderpig. Today we learn from Offbeat Enough that Oli Young, who had promised to name his second child Spiderpig if 100,000 people joined his Facebook group, has <a href="http://www.offbeatenough.com/2007/08/24/man-admits-spiderpig-hoax/">reneged on this promise</a>. Apparently, his wife is not even pregnant, and I'm pretty sure she wasn't consulted beforehand. Spiderpig is about the only name that doesn't appear in <strong>any</strong> of the baby name books I've seen.<br /><br /><strong>Fishy Spas</strong> --Thanks to <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/08/14/fish_that_feed_on_de.html">Boingboing.net</a> for a story about an ancient middle-Eastern skin treatment that has become popular in China. There, those with skin ailments are immersing themselves in pools filled with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_fish">Doctor Fish</a>, a minnow-sized fish that feeds on the affected and dead skin, in essence nibbling the patient to health. Those with really serious cases might toss in a couple of piranhas to speed the process. How long before this becomes an American fad? Are you listening, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/estee-lauder-companies-inc-cl-a/el/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Estee Lauder</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/estee-lauder-companies-inc-cl-a/el/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">EL</a>)? <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">JNJ</a>)?<br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/25/funny-bidness-e-cards-that-rock-robot-spy-blimp-spiderpig-h/">Funny Bidness -- e-cards that rock; robot spy blimp; Spiderpig hoax; a fishy spa treatment</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.someecards.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/25/funny-bidness-e-cards-that-rock-robot-spy-blimp-spiderpig-h/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/972993/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/25/funny-bidness-e-cards-that-rock-robot-spy-blimp-spiderpig-h/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aircraft</category><category>entertainment</category><category>facebook</category><category>film</category><category>humor</category><category>simpsons movie</category><category>SimpsonsMovie</category><category>spyblimp</category><category>us army</category><category>UsArmy</category><category>weird stories</category><category>WeirdStories</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viacom earnings exceed low expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/viacom-earnings-exceeds-low-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/viacom-earnings-exceeds-low-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/viacom-earnings-exceeds-low-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mtv-owner-viacom-beats-estimates/20070802075209990001">Viacom Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mtv-owner-viacom-beats-estimates/20070802075209990001">VIA</a>) today reported second quarter earnings that <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mtv-owner-viacom-beats-estimates/20070802075209990001">exceeded Wall Street's low expectations. </a></p>
<p>Net income was $434 million, or 63 cents per share, compared with $437 million, or 61 cents, the New York-based company said in <a href="http://www.viacom.com/PDF/Release%202Q%202007%20FINAL.pdf">a press release</a>. Revenue rose 13% to $3.19 billion. Excluding gains and charges, profit was 54 cents. Analysts had expected earnings of 50 cents on revenue of $3.07 billion, according to Thomson Financial.</p>
<p>Advertising revenue rose 6% to $1.15 billion while affiliate fees jumped 15% to $577 million. Though profit was hurt by higher costs, revenue from its cable channels rose 10 percent to $1.92 billion, helped by a gain on the sale of MTV Networks' investment in Russia and an impairment charge from Amp'd Mobile. </p>
<p>Strong box office receipts from its Dreamworks SKG films "Shrek the Third" and "Over the Hedge" helped push up revenue in the Filmed Entertainment business by 20% to $1.31 billion. David Jones, an analyst with Miller Tabak &amp; Co., told <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aahMaT.QZ5II&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a> that the unit outperformed his expectations by about $100 million.</p>
<p>Shares of Viacom are down more than 7% this year as investors continue to worry about who will succeed chairman Sumner Redstone who reportedly is feuding now with his daughter Shari.</p>
<p>"Revenue was better than expected because filmed entertainment outperformed by about $100 million or so,'' David Joyce, an analyst with Miller Tabak &amp; Co. in New York, said in an interview. He has a "buy'' rating on the shares and doesn't own them. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/viacom-earnings-exceeds-low-expectations/">Viacom earnings exceed low expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.viacom.com/PDF/Release%202Q%202007%20FINAL.pdf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/viacom-earnings-exceeds-low-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/956187/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/viacom-earnings-exceeds-low-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comedy central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>dreamworks skg</category><category>DreamworksSkg</category><category>film</category><category>inthenews</category><category>movies</category><category>mtv</category><category>mtv network</category><category>MtvNetwork</category><category>shari redstone</category><category>ShariRedstone</category><category>sumner redstone</category><category>SumnerRedstone</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney looks to C.S. Lewis for continued box office boost]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>At Comic-Con this year, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) announced its commitment to make <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/28/comic-con-breaking-news-disney-commits-to-make-all-narnia-fil/"></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/28/comic-con-breaking-news-disney-commits-to-make-all-narnia-fil/">all </a>seven of the Chronicles of Narnia books into feature films, releasing one a year starting in May '08 with Prince Caspian. This decision follows the success of the adaptation of the first book -- The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe -- which grossed almost $300 million.<br /><br />This decision is not surprising, following the conclusion of Disney's Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy, which has no immediate plans to continue. Disney is predictably looking for its next goldmine franchise, and what better to use than a seven book series which already had a successful start?<br /><br />The only question is whether the quality of production will suffer in the sequels from such an ambitious filming schedule, and after Disney pulled off the Pirates trilogy with such dazzling effects, I doubt that will be a concern -- although the quality of the Pirates scripts did fade down the stretch. At least with these movies, the writers will have a classic source to guide them.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/">Disney looks to C.S. Lewis for continued box office boost</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/953651/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>book</category><category>chronicles of narnia</category><category>ChroniclesOfNarnia</category><category>cs lewis</category><category>CsLewis</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><category>narnia</category><category>pirates of the caribbean</category><category>PiratesOfTheCaribbean</category><category>prince caspian</category><category>PrinceCaspian</category><category>the lion the witch and the wardrobe</category><category>TheLionTheWitchAndTheWardrobe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[BloggingStocks Interview: GE CFO talks up NBC Universal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/bloggingstocks-interview-ge-cfo-talks-up-nbc-universal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/bloggingstocks-interview-ge-cfo-talks-up-nbc-universal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/bloggingstocks-interview-ge-cfo-talks-up-nbc-universal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p align="left"><img height="198" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/keith-sherin.jpg" width="160" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><strong>General Electric Co. </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) CFO Keith Sherin defended his company's continued holding of NBC Universal and gave the media conglomerate a surprisingly high valuation of between $40 billion and $45 billion.</p>
<p>GE has been getting plenty of flack about holding on to NBC since it is not #1 or #2 in its market, as previous CEO Jack Welch would have wanted it to be. Sherin pointed out during a lunch meeting with me, my fellow blogger Jon Ogg and a few other writers that NBC is "priceless waterfront property." Sherin argued that Welch had picked up NBC from RCA at a relatively low price -- increasing its value from $3 billion to $10 billion. And in 2004, after forming NBC Universal with Vivendi Universal, the new entity was worth $32 billion. Sherin now estimates that NBC Universal is worth between $40 billion and $45 billion, although I am not sure I understand how he arrived at this figure.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/bloggingstocks-interview-ge-cfo-talks-up-nbc-universal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>BloggingStocks Interview: GE CFO talks up NBC Universal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/bloggingstocks-interview-ge-cfo-talks-up-nbc-universal/">BloggingStocks Interview: GE CFO talks up NBC Universal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ge.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/bloggingstocks-interview-ge-cfo-talks-up-nbc-universal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/948772/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/bloggingstocks-interview-ge-cfo-talks-up-nbc-universal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dis</category><category>entertainment</category><category>film</category><category>ge</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Media</category><category>NBC</category><category>NBC television</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcTelevision</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>show business</category><category>ShowBusiness</category><category>television</category><category>theme parks</category><category>ThemeParks</category><category>Universal studios</category><category>UniversalStudios</category><category>via</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why I am not wasting a baby sitter on <i>Harry Potter</i>]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/why-am-i-not-wasting-a-baby-sitter-on-harry-potter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/why-am-i-not-wasting-a-baby-sitter-on-harry-potter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/why-am-i-not-wasting-a-baby-sitter-on-harry-potter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p>Maybe at 39, I am too old and cynical to fall under the spell of Harry Potter. Maybe my nine-month-old son will one day become a fan of the teenage wizard. Until then, I shall avoid all Potter books and movies even though I am one of the few people on the planet to do so.</p>
<p><em>Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix</em>, the latest chapter in the J.K. Rowling franchise, grossed $44.8 million yesterday, the biggest Wednesday ever, according to <a href="http://news.aol.com/entertainment/story/_a/harry-potter-works-box-office-magic-in/n20070712170109990014">Reuters</a>. That's good news, of course, for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/twx">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/twx">TWX</a>), the film's producer and distributor.</p>
<p>The movie even got a backhanded compliment from A.O. Scott of the <a href="http://movies2.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/movies/10harr.html"><em>New York Times</em></a> who wrote; "Although <em>Order of the Phoenix</em> is not a great movie, it is a pretty good one, in part because it does not strain to overwhelm the audience with noise and sensation."</p>
<p>But investors shouldn't buy shares of the New York-based media company just because of one hit movie. Remember that blockbuster movies are extremely expensive to produce, though the power of Potter continues to amaze me.</p>
<p>Since 2001, the Potter saga movies have generated $3.5 billion in ticket sales. What they haven't done though, is reverse the decline in reading, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/books/11potter.html?_r=1&amp;n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fComplete%20Coverage%2fHarry%20Potter&amp;oref=slogin">the <em>Times</em> also notes</a>.</p>
<p>There are some things beyond the powers of the greatest wizards.</p>
<p> </p>
<strong>More <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/harry%20potter/">Harry Potter</a> news<br /> <br /> </strong><strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View The Harry Potter Finance Quiz on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/the-harry-potter-finance-quiz/">The Harry Potter Finance Quiz</a><br /> <strong>Gary E. Sattler: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; bestseller list leaves Harry Potter out on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/new-york-times-leaves-harry-potter-out-cold/"><em>New York Times</em> bestseller list leaves Harry Potter out</a><br />  <strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Harry Potter ending: A water cooler cheat sheet on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/harry-potter-ending-a-water-cooler-cheat-sheet/">Harry Potter ending: A water cooler cheat sheet</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View With Harry Potter done, is it time for Scholastic to sell itself? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/with-harry-potter-done-is-it-time-for-scholastic-to-sell-itself/">With Harry Potter done, is it time for Scholastic to sell itself?</a><br /> <strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Rowling safeguards Potter empire on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/rowling-safeguards-potter-empire/">Rowling safeguards Potter empire</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Is the last book the end of Potter mania? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/is-the-last-book-the-end-of-potter-mania/">Is the last book the end of Potter mania?</a><br /> <strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Harry Potter and the Pots of Gold on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/harry-potter-and-the-pots-of-gold/">Harry Potter and the Pots of Gold</a><br /> <strong>Barry Summerlin: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Harry Potter doesn't even need Muggle marketing on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/harry-potter-doesnt-even-need-muggle-marketing/">Harry Potter doesn't even need Muggle marketing</a><br /> <strong>Julie Tilsner: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Not even Harry can save bookstores from their fate on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/16/not-even-harry-can-save-bookstores-from-their-fate/">Not even Harry can save bookstores from their fate</a><br /> <strong>Peter Cohan: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Harry Potter and the Pot of Gold on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/harry-potter-and-the-pot-of-gold/">Harry Potter and the Pot of Gold</a><br /> <strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Will Rowling kill off Harry? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/06/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-will-rowling-kill-off-harr/">Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Will Rowling kill off Harry?</a><strong><br /> </strong>
<p><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/everybody-loves-harry-potter/">Everybody loves Harry Potter</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/everybody-loves-harry-potter/311330/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/potterreader_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Millions of loyal readers" title="Millions of loyal readers" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/everybody-loves-harry-potter/311333/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/scienceofharrypotterbook_thumbnail.jpg" alt="The science???" title="The science???" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/everybody-loves-harry-potter/311332/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/harrypotterge_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Would Harry Potter have sold off plastics?" title="Would Harry Potter have sold off plastics?" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/everybody-loves-harry-potter/311334/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/potterpodcast_thumbnail.jpg" alt="All Harry in your ear" title="All Harry in your ear" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/everybody-loves-harry-potter/311336/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/potterknitting_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Harry's knottiest problems" title="Harry's knottiest problems" /></a></div></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/why-am-i-not-wasting-a-baby-sitter-on-harry-potter/">Why I am not wasting a baby sitter on <i>Harry Potter</i></a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.aol.com/entertainment/story/_a/harry-potter-works-box-office-magic-in/n20070712170109990014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/why-am-i-not-wasting-a-baby-sitter-on-harry-potter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/939492/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/why-am-i-not-wasting-a-baby-sitter-on-harry-potter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>film</category><category>harry potter</category><category>harry potter books</category><category>harry potter movies</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>HarryPotterBooks</category><category>HarryPotterMovies</category><category>jk rowling</category><category>JkRowling</category><category>movies</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Simpsons-mania!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/simpsons-mania/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/simpsons-mania/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/simpsons-mania/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/simpsonfamily.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0462538/">The Simpsons Movie</a></em>, which has been 18 years in the making, is finally due to hit theaters July 27. The movie is creating quite a frenzy around the country -- with a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/02/7-elevens-become-kwik-e-marts-for-simpsons-promotion/">dozen 7-Elevens</a> in cities from New York to California turning into Kwik-E-Marts. They are also selling Simpsons branded products in all 7-Eleven stores (I bought a box of KrustyO's). The frenzy is even bigger in Springfield, Vermont, which was chosen to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2007-07-10-simpsons-vermont-inside_N.htm">host the premier of the movie</a>.<br /><br />The biggest beneficiary of the movie will be the same company that has benefited from the long, successful run of the show -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>). After 20 years on the small screen, making News Corp's Fox billions, the big screen version will look to take No. 1 at the box office. It shouldn't have any trouble, as most of this summer's blockbusters have already come and gone, and the other new movies out that week -- <em>I Know Who Killed Me</em> and <em>No Reservations</em> -- don't have anywhere near the hype, universal appeal or the marketing push of the Simpsons.<br /><br />Other beneficiaries are the aforementioned 7-Eleven, which is owned by Seven-Eleven Japan Co, the privately-owned toy company McFarlane toys, which is making <em>The Simpsons Movie</em> toys, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">Electronic Arts Inc</a> (NADSAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>), which is releasing a new <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Simpsons_Game">Simpsons video game</a> to coincide with the release of <em>The Simpsons Movie</em> on DVD.<br /><br />For a look behind the scenes at the history of the longest running comedy on television, <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2007/08/simpsons200708?printable=true&amp;currentPage=all">check out this article</a> from <em>Vanity Fair</em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/simpsons-mania/">Simpsons-mania!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/simpsons-mania/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/939162/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/simpsons-mania/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>7-11</category><category>7-eleven</category><category>bart</category><category>film</category><category>homer</category><category>kwik-e-mart</category><category>movie</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>nws.a</category><category>seven-eleven</category><category>simpsons</category><category>springfield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
