Your 401(k) and ROTH IRA might be down, and shares of student lender Sallie Mae (NYSE: SLM) have gone from $50 to $15 since October, over concerns about the student loan market.

But you'll be happy to know that the endowment for Harvard is chugging right along, up in the 7-9% range for its fiscal year ended in June, according to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required).

In the current market malaise, that's enough to make it the best-performing major endowment, according to experts. That's especially impressive given the fund's massive size: $35 billion.

The Journal reports that "The endowment's staff pursued a strategy of shielding the fund from market downturns by purchasing credit-default swaps that helped protect it from wild market swings. Harvard also had a larger position than many endowments in plain-vanilla Treasury debt, which outperformed the stock market."

I have just one question: With a $35 billion endowment growing at 7% per year, why do they need to charge $45 thousand per yeah? To its credit, the school announced late last year that it would extend much more generous financial aid to middle-class families.

In this multi-part personal finance series, readers will learn various ways to help save money for a college education, from off-the wall-scholarships and 529 programs to the right time to refinance your loans. Parents and students alike who read this series will find something to help reduce the costs of a higher education before, during and after it takes place.

Part IV: Financial Aid

Last year, 1.8 million low- to moderate-income families missed out on help from the government because they did not fill out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA for short, which is needed to qualify for any federal, state and some institutional financial aid awards, according to the American Council on Education. In addition, the Council estimated that 1.5 million families missed out on the Pell Grant, an award of $4,310 that does not have to be paid back, just because they failed to file the proper paperwork.

If I told you the government would give you $4,310 if you simply filled out a form, you'd do it in a heartbeat right?

The scandals in the student lending industry continue. On April 1st, I wrote about student loan companies taking phone calls for college financial aid offices. Apparently, an Education Department official and financial aid directors at several collges received stock in a student loan company's private placement. This has has "Pay to play" written all over it. The President of the student lending company, Student Loan Xpress, characterized the stock transfers as "gifts" while several of the recipients claim to have paid for them. Either way, this raises two questions:

• Assuming they did pay for the stock: Is it appropriate for financial aid directors to have such a close relationship with an executive at a student loan company that they are purchasing stock in a private placement?
• If it was merely a gift, why was their relationship so close that he decided to give them a gift. Or was it a quid pro quo? "I give you stock in my company, you steer students towards us for their lending needs."

It's hard to imagine any way that there isn't some foul play involved here. The colleges involved, Columbia, University of Southern California, and the University of Texas at Austin have placed the individuals involved on leave. With college costs careening out of control, students need to be able to count on receiving unbiased advise from the financial aid offices at the colleges they are attending. Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts is conducting an inquiry into student lending practices. This may be just the tip of the iceberg in what could break into a full-fledged scandal. Hopefully this will get the media attention it deserves.

I'm going to be really disappointed if there isn't a massive amount of outrage in response to this. According to a piece in Thursday's New York Times, students calling the financial aid office at some colleges may, unbeknownst to them, actually end up speaking with a representative from a student lending corporation. Their calls are automatically routed and answered as though they had reached the college's office. But they haven't. This is how a representative from Texas Tech, which engages in this practice, responded to questions:

Becky Wilson, director of financial aid at Texas Tech, defended the practice of routing student financial aid questions to Nelnet and said that the university was "trying to make the aid process as seamless as possible for students" so they do not have to deal with multiple people. She said that if call center workers identified themselves as Nelnet employees it would cause confusion ...

Great. And I suppose that disgraced Merrill Lynch analyst Henry Blodget's practice of giving stock recommendations based on the encouragement (read: bonuses) provided by the company's investment banking arm made the process "seamless."

But New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo sees through this. He said the call centers pose "an inherent conflict of interest" because "a self-interested lender is providing what is purported to be unbiased advice."

That's exactly the point. I'm certainly not saying that there is anything bad going on. I would never accuse banks or other companies in the financial services industry of not acting in their customers' best interests (although James Scurlock certainly would, and does, in his amazing book Maxed Out). But just as the not-necessarily corrupt relationship between investment banks and research analysts provides ample opportunity for unscrupulous conduct, it seems likely that this system of colleges forwarding calls to loan providers does as well.