<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[European Union Sets New Short Selling and Derivatives Curbs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/european-union-sets-new-short-selling-and-derivatives-curbs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/european-union-sets-new-short-selling-and-derivatives-curbs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/european-union-sets-new-short-selling-and-derivatives-curbs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="European Union" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/eu-flag-240.jpg" />So the European Union's 27-nation bloc is setting <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLAG00637020100915">new rules for short selling</a> and derivatives trading. The European Commission set up the European Securities and Market Authority to police European markets.</p>
<p>Michel Barnier, European Union commissioner in charge of reform said: "Today we are proposing rules -- so we know who is doing what and who owes what to who."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/european-union-sets-new-short-selling-and-derivatives-curbs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>European Union Sets New Short Selling and Derivatives Curbs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/european-union-sets-new-short-selling-and-derivatives-curbs/">European Union Sets New Short Selling and Derivatives Curbs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/european-union-sets-new-short-selling-and-derivatives-curbs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19634643/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/european-union-sets-new-short-selling-and-derivatives-curbs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>derivatives trading</category><category>European Securities and Market Authority</category><category>European Union</category><category>financial reform</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Michel Barnier</category><category>short selling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whistleblowing Provision in Financial Reform Act Could Mean Big Payouts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="whistleblowers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/seclogo.jpg" />Are you a whistleblower? If so, you could receive <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/efa8a32a-a31a-11df-8cf4-00144feabdc0.html">big payouts</a> from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).<br />
<br />
The new financial reform act has a provision that rewards whistleblowers, senior employees and third-party informants who provide the SEC with information that results in prosecution. The payouts could be huge. People who provide the SEC with information that leads to a successful enforcement are entitled to receive 10% to 30% of any sanction over $1 million -- including a share of the proceeds from any related regulatory action or shareholders' lawsuit.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whistleblowing Provision in Financial Reform Act Could Mean Big Payouts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/">Whistleblowing Provision in Financial Reform Act Could Mean Big Payouts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/efa8a32a-a31a-11df-8cf4-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19585550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/whistleblowing-provision-in-the-financial-reform-act-could-mean/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dodd-frank wall street reform</category><category>financial reform</category><category>financial reform bill</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SEC</category><category>whistleblower</category><category>whistleblowers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Visa Drops After Financial Reform Bill Passes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/visa-drops-after-financial-reform-bill-passes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/visa-drops-after-financial-reform-bill-passes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/visa-drops-after-financial-reform-bill-passes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/v/" rel="tag">Visa Inc. (V)</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://investor.visa.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=215693&amp;p=irol-IRHome"><img width="113" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="75" border="0" align="right" alt="V logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/visa-logo.jpg" /></a>Visa (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/visa-inc-visa-inc/v/nys">V</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/visa-inc-visa-inc/v/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower along with most credit card companies this morning after <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/taxes/senate-passes-financial-reform-bill-obama-will-sign/19556138/">the Senate passed a financial regulatory overhaul yesterday which would reduce interchange fees that retailers must pay issuers and banks for debit-card transactions</a>. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on V.<br />
<br />
This morning, V opened at $73.60. So far today the stock has hit a high of $73.75 and a low of $71.27. As of 12:15, V is trading at $72.69, down $2.59 (-3.4%). The chart for V looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives V a positive 5 STARS (out of 5) strong buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/visa-drops-after-financial-reform-bill-passes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Visa Drops After Financial Reform Bill Passes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/visa-drops-after-financial-reform-bill-passes/">Visa Drops After Financial Reform Bill Passes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/visa-drops-after-financial-reform-bill-passes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19557497/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/16/visa-drops-after-financial-reform-bill-passes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial reform</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><category>Senate</category><category>V</category><category>Visa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><font><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" /></font>Continuing from where I left off earlier today regarding <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/">the Goldman Sachs - Paulson &amp; Company debacle...</a><br />
<br />
What would have happened if the collateralized debt obligations were created and sold exactly as was done, shorted by Paulson, and the eventual buyer was Warren Buffett? <br />
<br />
First of all, <em>"my pal Warren" </em>would not let his position be known to anyone beyond normal filing requirements and perhaps announced at some later date. Second, if it was disclosed that Buffett was betting against Paulson, Mr Paulson would be a huge fool if he did not think twice about his shorting the CDO given this new piece of information. Third, should the buyers of the actual CDO be treated differently than Buffett, or you or me? Of course not.<br />
<br />
If I were CEO Blankfein, that is what I would have tossed back at Congress.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/">Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures -- Part 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 May 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19474530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congressional Budget Office</category><category>Federal Reserve Board</category><category>financial reform</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>warren buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><font><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" /></font>The more I think about the issue of Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) being charged by the SEC for questionable business practices, and hauled in front of Congress for a big show, the more I think it is Congress that is at fault for the whole financial mess and should be answering questions.<br />
<br />
It is not that Wall Street had no hand in the entire debacle, but it started with Congress and they magnified the damage by failing to correct their critical mistakes. I will get back to this later, but first I want to discuss the recent hearings and the fact that Goldman Sachs management was actually too easy on Congress.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/">Congress, SEC and Goldman Sachs Failures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 May 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19473000/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/12/congress-sec-and-goldman-sachs-failures-part-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cdo</category><category>CDOs</category><category>Congress</category><category>featured</category><category>financial reform</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>John Paulson</category><category>Paulson Co.</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Senate Reaches Agreement on 'Too Big to Fail']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/senate-reaches-agreement-on-too-big-to-fail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/senate-reaches-agreement-on-too-big-to-fail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/senate-reaches-agreement-on-too-big-to-fail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/capitol-senate-240.jpg" alt="" />As the Senate moves forward with passing its landmark financial reform bill, it has at least reached an agreement on one important component -- <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6430I920100504?type=politicsNews">the "too big to fail" provision</a>. The Dodd-Shelby accord was supposed to include a proposed $50 billion fund, paid by large financial firms to cover the costs of break up firms when they get in a bind.<br />
<br />
There are several other proposals and provisions still being discussed. A proposal by Blanche Lincoln calling for banks to spin off their derivatives business is losing steam, but it is still on the table. Let's not forget that it was the wild speculation in derivatives that caused our financial meltdown. To do nothing on this issue borders on irresponsibility.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/senate-reaches-agreement-on-too-big-to-fail/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Senate Reaches Agreement on 'Too Big to Fail'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/senate-reaches-agreement-on-too-big-to-fail/">Senate Reaches Agreement on 'Too Big to Fail'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 May 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6430I920100504?type=politicsNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/senate-reaches-agreement-on-too-big-to-fail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19464705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/senate-reaches-agreement-on-too-big-to-fail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>financial reform</category><category>Geithner Penalty Waiver Act</category><category>inthenews</category><category>too big to fail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: When Will Citigroup Buy Back Shares?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/chasing-value-when-will-citigroup-buy-back-shares/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/chasing-value-when-will-citigroup-buy-back-shares/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/chasing-value-when-will-citigroup-buy-back-shares/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Citigroup logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/logo-citigroup.jpg" />The U.S. Treasury is <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/treasury-announces-plans-for-first/999349/">selling 1.5 billion of its shares</a> of Citigroup Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and it's quite likely that Citigroup will start buying back shares at some point, but when?</p>
<p>Given the fact that the number of shares has doubled over the past couple of years, and that there is pressure on the stock from the government sale combined with news of the final negotiations regarding a sweeping financial reform bill coming to a conclusion, it was no wonder that the stock took quite a beating through Monday's trading session.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/chasing-value-when-will-citigroup-buy-back-shares/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: When Will Citigroup Buy Back Shares?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/chasing-value-when-will-citigroup-buy-back-shares/">Chasing Value: When Will Citigroup Buy Back Shares?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/chasing-value-when-will-citigroup-buy-back-shares/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19454913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/27/chasing-value-when-will-citigroup-buy-back-shares/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>citi</category><category>citigroup</category><category>financial reform</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>value investing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Moody's McDaniel Admits That Banks Pressured Them for Good Ratings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/25/moodys-admits-banks-pressured-them-for-good-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/25/moodys-admits-banks-pressured-them-for-good-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/25/moodys-admits-banks-pressured-them-for-good-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/moodys-logo.jpg" alt="Moody's MCO logo" />The ratings game that was played during the financial crisis was a major factor in bringing down our economy.</p>
<p>Here's how the game was played. Banks like Goldman Sachs (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) would <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9456f280-4f03-11df-b8f4-00144feab49a.html">pay a rating agency to rate their securities</a>. Moody's chief executive, Raymond McDaniel, told a Senate panel on Friday that he was <em>not told</em> by Goldman about the fact that hedge fund Paulson &amp; Co. was betting against Goldman's Abacus securities. He said: "It just changes the whole dynamic -- if the person choosing it wants to blow it up."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/25/moodys-admits-banks-pressured-them-for-good-ratings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Moody's McDaniel Admits That Banks Pressured Them for Good Ratings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/25/moodys-admits-banks-pressured-them-for-good-ratings/">Moody's McDaniel Admits That Banks Pressured Them for Good Ratings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/25/moodys-admits-banks-pressured-them-for-good-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19452938/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/25/moodys-admits-banks-pressured-them-for-good-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eric Kochinsky</category><category>financial reform</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MCO</category><category>Moodys</category><category>Raymond McDaniel</category><category>Yuri Yoshizawa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GAO audit of the Fed would represent a giant step -- backward]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/gao-audit-of-the-fed-would-represent-a-giant-step-backward/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/gao-audit-of-the-fed-would-represent-a-giant-step-backward/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/gao-audit-of-the-fed-would-represent-a-giant-step-backward/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/fedres-logo.jpg" alt="" />The financial services reform process is likely to yield many public policy improvements, but one dimension that Congress should not act on concerns the U.S. Federal Reserve.</p>
<p>One reform effort would authorize the General Accountability Office (GAO) to <a href="http://www.house.gov/frank/pressreleases/2009/11-20-09-too-big-to-fail.html">audit the Federal Reserve</a>. The initiative, though well-intentioned, would represent a regression.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/gao-audit-of-the-fed-would-represent-a-giant-step-backward/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GAO audit of the Fed would represent a giant step -- backward</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/gao-audit-of-the-fed-would-represent-a-giant-step-backward/">GAO audit of the Fed would represent a giant step -- backward</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/gao-audit-of-the-fed-would-represent-a-giant-step-backward/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19276960/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/14/gao-audit-of-the-fed-would-represent-a-giant-step-backward/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>financial reform</category><category>GAO</category><category>General Accountability Office</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barney Frank capitulates to the bankers on derivatives reforms]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/barney-frank-capitulates-to-the-bankers-on-derivatives-reforms/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/barney-frank-capitulates-to-the-bankers-on-derivatives-reforms/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/barney-frank-capitulates-to-the-bankers-on-derivatives-reforms/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p>We can just about shelve any hopes of banking reform from Congress. Barney Frank, Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee said: "I don't think you're <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5962WP20091007">going to see that happen</a>" (referring to mandates for financial companies to process their swaps through a clearinghouse).</p>
<p>Frank went on to say that there would be a presumption that standardized contracts would be sent to a clearinghouse but that it would not be an iron clad rule. With the bankers ignoring established rules and doing pretty much what they want, forget about that idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/barney-frank-capitulates-to-the-bankers-on-derivatives-reforms/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barney Frank capitulates to the bankers on derivatives reforms</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/barney-frank-capitulates-to-the-bankers-on-derivatives-reforms/">Barney Frank capitulates to the bankers on derivatives reforms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5962WP20091007>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/barney-frank-capitulates-to-the-bankers-on-derivatives-reforms/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19188101/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/barney-frank-capitulates-to-the-bankers-on-derivatives-reforms/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clearinghouse</category><category>financial reform</category><category>FinancialReform</category><category>listed exhanges</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Wall Street influencing Obama's regulations?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/is-wall-street-influencing-obamas-regulations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/is-wall-street-influencing-obamas-regulations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/is-wall-street-influencing-obamas-regulations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/blog-money-winners-barack-obama-200x267.jpg" />In a word: yes.</p>
<p>Despite <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124533361307927645.html ">all the talk</a> about regulating these speculative investment vehicles, "Obama's financial overhaul plan included no big surprises or threats to the lucrative, secretive industry," writes <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562579691335609.html"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</p>
<p>The name of the game is lobbying, which is easily funded by the $1.3 trillion dollar industry. Even after numerous Ponzi schemes and frauds have recently been exposed, the U.S. government <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/09/will-dems-help-the-sec-rein-in-hedge-funds/">has failed at regulating hedge funds</a>, the most speculative area in finance, in part due to the industry's lobbying efforts.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/is-wall-street-influencing-obamas-regulations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Wall Street influencing Obama's regulations?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/is-wall-street-influencing-obamas-regulations/">Is Wall Street influencing Obama's regulations?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/is-wall-street-influencing-obamas-regulations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19073809/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/01/is-wall-street-influencing-obamas-regulations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>Fed</category><category>financial reform</category><category>FINRA</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>lobbying</category><category>Obama</category><category>Robert Picard</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daleela Farina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
