Bank of America (BAC) doesn't seem to have any desire to kick it up this afternoon: it neither wants to rally nor plunge. With about one hour to go before the market closes up for the day, the stock is down a nickel to $12.29. Volume, though, is well above average, so there's been a lot of interest in the name after the release of the company's Q3 report.

Since about the middle of April, the stock has not been a good performer. As the chart shows, it's been downhill since then. The 52-week low for the shares is $11.74, while the 52-week high is $19.86. Judging by the proximity to the yearly low, Wall Street is apparently a bit bearish on Bank of America.

Citigroup, Inc. (C) is doing well today. At the time of this writing, shares were up 5% to $4.15. Volume was quite active. How should market participants view the stock? Should they be bullish or bearish?

There are a lot of opinions out there on this company. If you remember the financial crisis, then you may feel like this is a stock one should never put money in. But if you're a speculator, you probably always consider the equity as a potential vehicle for short-term gains. It's changing hands in the low single digits, and its chart communicates many possibilities for traders.

Citigroup decided to take some action on banks, upgrading Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) to buy from hold, and cutting Barclays (BCS) to hold from buy. Citigroup cited valuation as the main reason for the RBS upgrade. In the U.K., RBS finished the day nearly 1.3% higher.

The brokerage firm said it downgraded Barclays because in its view "the 'new' theme that the first-half 2010 results highlighted is the effects that economic deleveraging is having on the loan books and revenues of the banks." Citigroup added that "A much higher proportion of revenues are linked to new business levels than are costs. To tackle this earnings threat, banks need a combination of pricing power, margin expansion and a strong cost story." In overseas trade, BCS finished the day more than 1% lower.

Wells Fargo (WFC) announced Wednesday that it will lay off 3,800 employees during the next year as the bank attempts to restructure its consumer finance unit. Wells Fargo Financial will be integrated into the company's community banking network -- closing 638 independent consumer finance offices in the process. The firm added that it is no longer going to deal with non-prime mortgage loans.

Reportedly, roughly 27% of the financial firm's Wells Fargo Financial employees will be laid off. In the next two months, 2,800 employees will be sent packing, while 1,000 more will be jettisoned in the next year. According to WFC, these changes will not affect WFC and Wachovia banks across the United States.

The financial sector has been a strange double-edged sword in portfolios over the past two years or so. In the wake of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, billions of wealth was erased in what were long thought of as conservative stocks. Then the resurgence of some banks since the lows of last year made other investors a fortune, with Citigroup (C) and Bank of America (BAC) both soaring about 300% since historic lows on March 9, 2009.

The drama continues in the financial sector even now with the endless see-saw of mortgage default news and the continued worries over sovereign debt in the eurozone. Any investor jumping into financial stocks right now is really taking the tiger by the tail -- but if you do your homework, there a number of opportunities in the sector become clear -- particularly among financials in Latin America.

JPMorgan Chase (JPM) is a financial stock, and as such, you've got a right to be cautious about it, considering what's happened to the economy over the last couple years. Today, however, the equity, whose colleagues include Bank of America (BAC) and Citigroup (C), appears pretty appealing. Wall Street enjoyed the results of the bank's first quarter, expressing its opinion by sending in the buy order.

As of this writing, shares of the company are up well over 3%, on robust volume. The stock has been strong since its last downturn, which ended back in February, according to the one-year chart.

One of the true icons of finance, Goldman Sachs Group (GS), issued its Q4 report this morning. The stock has been weak off the numbers; at the time of this writing, shares were down well over 5%, and volume was very active. Looking through the press release, I didn't come away as bearish as the market. Then again, the session as a whole was rather choppy, so perhaps overall sentiment was exerting an influence. Still, a 5% sell-off is notable.

Let's look at some highlights. For the fourth quarter, Goldman, whose colleagues include JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Morgan Stanley (MS), made $8.20 per share. Last year at this time, the company reported a loss of $4.97 per share. Besides improving year-over-year, per-share profit increased over 50% on a sequential basis as well. According to Earnings.com, $5.20 was the number to beat.

Before the market opens tomorrow, Bank of America (BAC) is going to be reporting its fourth quarter earnings numbers.

Going into tomorrow's earnings release, Wall Street analysts are looking for the company to show a loss of 52 cents per share. For the same period last year, the company had a loss of 48 cents per share.

On the final trading session before Christmas, Apple, Inc. (AAPL) shares hit an all-time high thanks to a published report hinting that another product announcement may be rolling in. On December 23, the Financial Times reported on its Tech Blog that Apple "has something big up its sleeve for next month."

The main reason for this speculation is that the tech company has booked a stage at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (YBCA) in San Francisco for "several days in late January." Apple has used this venue to make major announcements in the past, and the speculation is that Apple is going to make a major product announcement at the end of January. The blog quoted Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster as saying, "We believe there is a 75 per cent likelihood that Apple will have an event in January and a 50 per cent chance that it will be held to launch the Apple Tablet."

E*Trade (NASDAQ: ETFC) is a well-known brand in the broker space. It competes vigorously with the other giants, TD Ameritrade (NASDAQ: AMTD) and Charles Schwab (NASDAQ: SCHW). To be honest, if I were looking for investment ideas in this sector, I would probably begin my search with the latter two. It's difficult to put E*Trade on the list. The company got in trouble during the financial crisis because it was exposed to the mortgage industry. It has now become, in my opinion, a speculative play on a return to glory.

The latest earnings report shows what I'm talking about. For the third quarter, E*Trade lost, on a GAAP basis, 66 cents per share from continuing operations, wider than the year-ago loss of 60 cents per share from continuing operations. After adjusting for an item related to debt extinguishment, the current red ink is equal to 5 cents per share.

Interesting article from the Associated Press this morning, taking a look at how fast banks expanded during the past five years. The article states that banks added more than 10,000 full-service branches in the past five years, with nary a bank in the inner city (actually, one of every 10 was in a minority neighborhood).

The banks were "racing" to plant themselves in various parts of the country deemed exclusive or growing. The problem that the article looks at is the dearth of banks located in inner-city locations, which could lead to more charges for customers. This is a very real problem, and warrants the discussion; however, I want to take a look at the problem of overexpansion for the banking industry.

Late yesterday, MetLife (NYSE: MET) announced a second-quarter net loss of $1.74 per share, compared to earnings of $1.26 per share a year ago. The company blamed the loss on derivative losses of $1.8 billion, $1 billion of which was related to an increase in the company's own debt in the second quarter. Excluding charges, MET earned 88 cents per share for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate by 20 cents. The insurer's premiums, fees, and other revenue increased 4% to $8.38 billion thanks to a record amount of money spent in variable annuity products.

Variable annuities can be described as a contract between the purchaser and the insurance company. The insurer agrees to make payments to the purchaser either immediately or at a future date. Investment options for variable annuities are usually a mutual fund that invests in stocks, bonds, money market instruments, or a combination of the three.

I know, I know. You look at the recent performace of E*Trade's (NASDAQ: ETFC) shares and you say to yourself, man, I've got to play this stock and make some return! Sure, E*Trade shares have doubled since the first of the year. But then the earnings hit the fan, my trading friends, and that double suddenly disappeared.

The brokerage reported a Q1 loss that was wider than the year-ago number. E*Trade lost 41 cents per share versus a loss of 20 cents per share in 2008. According to this source, that was a penny worse than what Wall Street was bracing itself for.

Minyanville Professor Quint Tatro dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit www.minyanville.com.

There are a few things I am watching for today to give me better clues as to the internal character of the market.

Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT): It's off on retail numbers after the stock broke out of a four-month consolidation pattern on good volume. If the stock catches a bid, it is an indication that institutional investors are back stalking retail plays and would be bullish for the general market.

Energy ETF (AMEX: XLE): Energy has recently broken a longer term trend going back to mid-2006. It is bouncing off recent lows on very light volume. If money continues to rotate out of this sector, finding a home in the likes of retail, housing and financials, again a bullish sign. I initiated a short position in XLE this morning.

Financial ETF (AMEX: XLF): Financials have been and will continue to be the key to the market's future. After recapturing the 50-day moving average, this ETF is being brought down by AIG (AIG) and needs to regain its footing. Some consolidation is fine, but anything back below $20 would have me heading back towards the bunker.

Homebuilders ETF (AMEX: XHB): The homebuilders continue to perk up and also remain a key to the future of the tape. They are probing green today above their 50-day moving average on decent early volume. A break here above yesterday's high going on to attack the $19.00 level is also a bullish sign.

These are things I am watching for which will give me my clues to start wading back into the market with real capital.

(Prof. Tatro has positions in WMT, XLE, XLF, XHB).

When it comes to the banking industry, the good news just keeps coming. The head of the FDIC says that only about 13% of the banks on its watch list of troubled institutions actually fail. Except for the banks that go out of business, how could it get any better?

"We work with the primary regulator to give them extra care and attention, to nurse them back to health or to sell them off to another institution," said FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair, according to Reuters.

The comments side-step the issue that the credit crisis is getting worse. The IMF recently said that it could not see a bottom for the housing market and that financial companies would end up with $1 trillion in write-offs before the troubles pass. Bill Gross, the head of huge bond house Pimco, has essentially said the same thing.

The comment from the FDIC chief may be accurate based on a snapshot of the market today. It fails to acknowledge that the current watch list is only the tip of the iceberg.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.