<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America Flat After Earnings Release]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/bank-of-america-flat-after-earnings-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/bank-of-america-flat-after-earnings-release/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/bank-of-america-flat-after-earnings-release/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/bac-logo-240.jpg"  alt="Bank of America (BAC) logo" />Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) doesn't seem to have any desire to kick it up this afternoon: it neither wants to rally nor plunge. With about one hour to go before the market closes up for the day, the stock is down a nickel to $12.29. Volume, though, is well above average, so there's been a lot of interest in the name after the release of the company's Q3 report.</p>
<p>Since about the middle of April, the stock has not been a good performer. As the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys/tech-chart">chart</a> shows, it's been downhill since then. The 52-week low for the shares is $11.74, while the 52-week high is $19.86. Judging by the proximity to the yearly low, Wall Street is apparently a bit bearish on Bank of America.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/bank-of-america-flat-after-earnings-release/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America Flat After Earnings Release</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/bank-of-america-flat-after-earnings-release/">Bank of America Flat After Earnings Release</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/bank-of-america-reports-7-7-billion-earnings-loss/19679710/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/bank-of-america-flat-after-earnings-release/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19680360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/bank-of-america-flat-after-earnings-release/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup Sees a Bid After Q3 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/logo-citigroup.jpg" alt="" />Citigroup, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) is doing well today. At the time of this writing, shares were up 5% to $4.15. Volume was quite active. How should market participants view the stock? Should they be bullish or bearish?<br />
<br />
There are a lot of opinions out there on this company. If you remember the financial crisis, then you may feel like this is a stock one should never put money in. But if you're a speculator, you probably always consider the equity as a potential vehicle for short-term gains. It's changing hands in the low single digits, and its <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys/tech-chart">chart</a> communicates many possibilities for traders.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup Sees a Bid After Q3 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/">Citigroup Sees a Bid After Q3 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/citigroup-earnings-beat-wall-street-estimates/19678041/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19678771/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/citigroup-sees-a-bid-after-q3-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>C</category><category>citigroup</category><category>Citigroup earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>financial</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup Upgrades Royal Bank of Scotland, Downgrades Barclays]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/10/citigroup-upgrades-royal-bank-of-scotland-downgrades-barclays/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/10/citigroup-upgrades-royal-bank-of-scotland-downgrades-barclays/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/10/citigroup-upgrades-royal-bank-of-scotland-downgrades-barclays/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lyg/" rel="tag">Lloyds TSB Group plc ADS (LYG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/barclays-sign.jpg" />Citigroup decided to <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/citigroup-upgrades-rbs-downgrades-barclays-2010-09-10?dist=beforebell" target="_blank">take some action on banks</a>, upgrading Royal Bank of Scotland (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-royal-bank-of-scotland-group-plc/rbs/nys" target="_blank">RBS</a>) to buy from hold, and cutting Barclays (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/barclays-plc/bcs/nys" target="_blank">BCS</a>)  to hold from buy. Citigroup cited valuation as the main reason for the  RBS upgrade. In the U.K., RBS finished the day nearly 1.3% higher.<br />
<br />
The brokerage firm said it downgraded Barclays because in its view "the 'new' theme that the first-half 2010 results highlighted is the effects that economic deleveraging is having on the loan books and revenues of the banks." Citigroup added that "A much higher proportion of revenues are linked to new business levels than are costs. To tackle this earnings threat, banks need a combination of pricing power, margin expansion and a strong cost story." In overseas trade, BCS finished the day more than 1% lower.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/10/citigroup-upgrades-royal-bank-of-scotland-downgrades-barclays/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup Upgrades Royal Bank of Scotland, Downgrades Barclays</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/10/citigroup-upgrades-royal-bank-of-scotland-downgrades-barclays/">Citigroup Upgrades Royal Bank of Scotland, Downgrades Barclays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/10/citigroup-upgrades-royal-bank-of-scotland-downgrades-barclays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19628509/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/10/citigroup-upgrades-royal-bank-of-scotland-downgrades-barclays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial</category><category>financial industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rbs</category><category>Royal Bank of Scotland</category><category>U.K. banks</category><category>upgrades</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wells Fargo to Cut 3,800 Jobs in Restructuring]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/wellsfargo-200x150.jpg" alt="wfc layoffs" />Wells Fargo (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys" target="_blank">WFC</a>) announced Wednesday that it will lay off 3,800 employees during the next year as the bank attempts to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/wells-fargo-restructures-cutting-3-800-jobs/19545730/" target="_blank">restructure its consumer finance unit</a>. Wells Fargo Financial will be integrated into the company's community banking network -- closing 638 independent consumer finance offices in the process. The firm added that it is no longer going to deal with non-prime mortgage loans.</p>
<p>Reportedly, roughly 27% of the financial firm's Wells Fargo Financial employees will be laid off. In the next two months, 2,800 employees will be sent packing, while 1,000 more will be jettisoned in the next year. According to WFC, these changes will not affect WFC and Wachovia banks across the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wells Fargo to Cut 3,800 Jobs in Restructuring</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/">Wells Fargo to Cut 3,800 Jobs in Restructuring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19546242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>Wachovia</category><category>wells fargo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Three Booming Latin America Banks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/latin-america-bank-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/latin-america-bank-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/latin-america-bank-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/bank.jpg" alt="" />The financial sector has been a strange double-edged sword in portfolios over the past two years or so. In the wake of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, billions of wealth was erased in what were long thought of as conservative stocks. Then the resurgence of some banks since the lows of last year made other investors a fortune, with Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" class="inlinked">BAC</a>) both soaring about 300% since historic lows on March 9, 2009.</p>
<p>The drama continues in the financial sector even now with the endless see-saw of mortgage default news and the continued worries over sovereign debt in the eurozone. Any investor jumping into financial stocks right now is really taking the tiger by the tail -- but if you do your homework, there a number of opportunities in the sector become clear -- particularly among financials in Latin America.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/latin-america-bank-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Three Booming Latin America Banks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/latin-america-bank-stocks/">Three Booming Latin America Banks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/latin-america-bank-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19498726/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/01/latin-america-bank-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>argentina</category><category>BanColombia</category><category>bank stocks</category><category>banks</category><category>Chile</category><category>colombia</category><category>CorpBanca</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>featured</category><category>financial</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Navellier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase Up on Q1 News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/jpm-logo-200x150.gif" />JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) is a financial stock, and as such, you've got a right to be cautious about it, considering what's happened to the economy over the last couple years. Today, however, the equity, whose colleagues include Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>), appears pretty appealing. Wall Street enjoyed the results of the bank's <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/jpmorgan-earnings-jump-55-surpassing-estimates/19439248/">first quarter</a>, expressing its opinion by sending in the buy order.</p>
<p>As of this writing, shares of the company are up well over 3%, on robust volume. The stock has been strong since its last downturn, which ended back in February, according to the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys/tech-chart">one-year chart</a>.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan Chase Up on Q1 News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/">JPMorgan Chase Up on Q1 News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/jpmorgan-earnings-jump-55-surpassing-estimates/19439248/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19439869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>bank of america</category><category>banks</category><category>C</category><category>citigroup</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Not In Demand After Q4 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" alt="" />One of the true icons of finance, Goldman Sachs Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>), issued its Q4 report this morning. The stock has been weak off the numbers; at the time of this writing, shares were down well over 5%, and volume was very active. Looking through the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/goldman-sachs-reports-earnings-per-common-share-of-22-13-for-2009/rfid291470256?channel=pf">press release</a>, I didn't come away as bearish as the market. Then again, the session as a whole was rather choppy, so perhaps overall sentiment was exerting an influence. Still, a 5% sell-off is notable. </p>
<p>Let's look at some highlights. For the fourth quarter, Goldman, whose colleagues include JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) and Morgan Stanley (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>), made $8.20 per share. Last year at this time, the company reported a loss of $4.97 per share. Besides improving year-over-year, per-share profit increased over 50% on a sequential basis as well. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=gs">Earnings.com</a>, $5.20 was the number to beat. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs Not In Demand After Q4 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/">Goldman Sachs Not In Demand After Q4 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/goldman-sachs-reports-earnings-per-common-share-of-22-13-for-2009/rfid291470256?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19326250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>financial</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>JPM</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>MS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America Fourth Quarter Earnings Preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/bank-of-america-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/bank-of-america-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/bank-of-america-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="bank of america earnings preview" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/bac-logo-240.jpg" />Before the market opens tomorrow, Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nyshttp://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) is going to be <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10663504/2/bank-of-america-earnings-preview.html">reporting its fourth quarter earnings numbers</a>.<br /><br />Going into tomorrow's earnings release, Wall Street analysts are looking for the company to show a loss of 52 cents per share. For the same period last year, the company had a loss of 48 cents per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/bank-of-america-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America Fourth Quarter Earnings Preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/bank-of-america-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/">Bank of America Fourth Quarter Earnings Preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/bank-of-america-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19322978/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/19/bank-of-america-fourth-quarter-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>banking</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>banks</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>financial</category><category>lenders</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple Stock Higher Amid Rumors of a New Product]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/apple-store-200.jpg" />On the final trading session before Christmas, Apple, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aapl/nys" target="_blank">AAPL</a>) shares hit an all-time high thanks to a published report hinting that another product announcement may be rolling in. On December 23, the <em>Financial Times</em> reported on its Tech Blog that Apple "<a href="http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/2009/12/exclusive-apple-to-host-event-in-january/" target="_blank">has something big up its sleeve for next month</a>."</p>
<p>The main reason for this speculation is that the tech company has booked a stage at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (YBCA) in San Francisco for "several days in late January." Apple has used this venue to make major announcements in the past, and the speculation is that Apple is going to make a major product announcement at the end of January. The blog quoted Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster as saying, "We believe there is a 75 per cent likelihood that Apple will have an event in January and a 50 per cent chance that it will be held to launch the Apple Tablet."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple Stock Higher Amid Rumors of a New Product</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/">Apple Stock Higher Amid Rumors of a New Product</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19295456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple innovation</category><category>AppleInnovation</category><category>featured</category><category>Financial</category><category>Financial Times</category><category>FinancialTimes</category><category>new apple product</category><category>new tech</category><category>new technology</category><category>NewAppleProduct</category><category>NewTech</category><category>NewTechnology</category><category>rumors</category><category>tech</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[E*Trade loses less than expected in third quarter -- is this a victory?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/e-trade-loses-less-than-expected-in-third-quarter-is-this-a-v/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/e-trade-loses-less-than-expected-in-third-quarter-is-this-a-v/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/e-trade-loses-less-than-expected-in-third-quarter-is-this-a-v/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/schw/" rel="tag">Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/etrade.gif" width="220" height="220" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*Trade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) is a well-known brand in the broker space. It competes vigorously with the other giants, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas">TD Ameritrade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas">AMTD</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-charles-schwab-corporation/schw/nas">Charles Schwab</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-charles-schwab-corporation/schw/nas">SCHW</a>). To be honest, if I were looking for investment ideas in this sector, I would probably begin my search with the latter two. It's difficult to put E*Trade on the list. The company got in trouble during the financial crisis because it was exposed to the mortgage industry. It has now become, in my opinion, a speculative play on a return to glory.</p>
<p>The latest <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/e-trade-financial-corporation-announces-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid264891045?channel=pf">earnings report</a> shows what I'm talking about. For the third quarter, E*Trade lost, on a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/Generally%20Accepted%20Accounting%20Principles%20-%20GAAP">GAAP</a> basis, 66 cents per share from continuing operations, wider than the year-ago loss of 60 cents per share from continuing operations. After adjusting for an item related to debt extinguishment, the current red ink is equal to 5 cents per share. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/e-trade-loses-less-than-expected-in-third-quarter-is-this-a-v/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>E*Trade loses less than expected in third quarter -- is this a victory?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/e-trade-loses-less-than-expected-in-third-quarter-is-this-a-v/">E*Trade loses less than expected in third quarter -- is this a victory?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/e-trade-financial-corporation-announces-third-quarter-2009-results/rfid264891045?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/Generally%20Accepted%20Accounting%20Principles%20-%20GAAP>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/BANKSL/idUSN2726411620091027?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/e-trade-loses-less-than-expected-in-third-quarter-is-this-a-v/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/e-trade-loses-less-than-expected-in-third-quarter-is-this-a-v/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMTD</category><category>brokers</category><category>charles schwab</category><category>CharlesSchwab</category><category>ETFC</category><category>etrade</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SCHW</category><category>td ameritrade</category><category>TdAmeritrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can banks resist the urge to overexpand?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/can-banks-resist-the-urge-to-overexpand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/can-banks-resist-the-urge-to-overexpand/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/can-banks-resist-the-urge-to-overexpand/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/bofa_240.jpg" width="220" height="154" alt="" />Interesting article from the Associated Press this morning, taking a look at how fast banks <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/ap-impact-banks-added-10000-branches-in/624283">expanded during the past five years</a>. The article states that banks added more than 10,000 full-service branches in the past five years, with nary a bank in the inner city (actually, one of every 10 was in a minority neighborhood).</p>
<p>The banks were "racing" to plant themselves in various parts of the country deemed exclusive or growing. The problem that the article looks at is the dearth of banks located in inner-city locations, which could lead to more charges for customers. This is a very real problem, and warrants the discussion; however, I want to take a look at the problem of overexpansion for the banking industry.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/can-banks-resist-the-urge-to-overexpand/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can banks resist the urge to overexpand?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/can-banks-resist-the-urge-to-overexpand/">Can banks resist the urge to overexpand?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/can-banks-resist-the-urge-to-overexpand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19131322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/17/can-banks-resist-the-urge-to-overexpand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank expansion</category><category>banks</category><category>financial</category><category>financial stocks</category><category>inthenews</category><category>over expansion</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MetLife's second-quarter earnings top the Street's expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/metlifes-second-quarter-earnings-top-the-streets-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/metlifes-second-quarter-earnings-top-the-streets-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/metlifes-second-quarter-earnings-top-the-streets-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/met/" rel="tag">MetLife Inc. (MET)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/met-metlife-logo.jpg" alt="" />Late yesterday, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys">MetLife</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/metlife-inc/met/nys">MET</a>) announced a second-quarter net loss of $1.74 per share, compared to earnings of $1.26 per share a year ago. The company blamed the loss on derivative losses of $1.8 billion, $1 billion of which was related to an increase in the company's own debt in the second quarter. Excluding charges, MET <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story//metlife-reports-14-billion-quarterly-net-loss-2009-07-30-162600">earned 88 cents per share</a> for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate by 20 cents. The insurer's premiums, fees, and other revenue increased 4% to $8.38 billion thanks to a record amount of money spent in variable annuity products.</p>
<p>Variable annuities can be described as a contract between the purchaser and the insurance company. The insurer agrees to make payments to the purchaser either immediately or at a future date. Investment options for variable annuities are usually a mutual fund that invests in stocks, bonds, money market instruments, or a combination of the three.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/metlifes-second-quarter-earnings-top-the-streets-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MetLife's second-quarter earnings top the Street's expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/metlifes-second-quarter-earnings-top-the-streets-expectations/">MetLife's second-quarter earnings top the Street's expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/metlifes-second-quarter-earnings-top-the-streets-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19115368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/metlifes-second-quarter-earnings-top-the-streets-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial</category><category>financials</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investing</category><category>MetLife</category><category>quarterly earnings</category><category>variable annuities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[E*Trade loses more money -- why would I want to own this stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/e-trade-loses-more-money-why-would-i-want-to-own-this-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/e-trade-loses-more-money-why-would-i-want-to-own-this-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/e-trade-loses-more-money-why-would-i-want-to-own-this-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/schw/" rel="tag">Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/etrade-etfc-logo.gif" />I know, I know. You look at the recent performace of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*Trade</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) shares and you say to yourself, man, I've got to play this stock and make some return! Sure, E*Trade shares have doubled since the first of the year. But then the earnings hit the fan, my trading friends, and that double suddenly disappeared.
<p>The brokerage reported a <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/etrade-financial-corporation-announces/rfid208486469">Q1 loss</a> that was wider than the year-ago number. E*Trade lost 41 cents per share versus a loss of 20 cents per share in 2008. According to this <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=etfc">source</a>, that was a penny worse than what Wall Street was bracing itself for. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/e-trade-loses-more-money-why-would-i-want-to-own-this-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>E*Trade loses more money -- why would I want to own this stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/e-trade-loses-more-money-why-would-i-want-to-own-this-stock/">E*Trade loses more money -- why would I want to own this stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/10493270/1/etrade-loss-widens-no-word-on-tarp-aid.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/e-trade-loses-more-money-why-would-i-want-to-own-this-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1531278/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/e-trade-loses-more-money-why-would-i-want-to-own-this-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMTD</category><category>brokers</category><category>charles schwab</category><category>CharlesSchwab</category><category>ETFC</category><category>etrade</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SCHW</category><category>td ameritrade</category><category>TdAmeritrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Clues can be found in WMT, ETFs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/clues-can-be-found-in-wmt-etfs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/clues-can-be-found-in-wmt-etfs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/clues-can-be-found-in-wmt-etfs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/todd_harrison.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Minyanville Professor Quint Tatro dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">www.minyanville.com</a>.</em></p>
<p>There are a few things I am watching for today to give me better clues as to the internal character of the market. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a></strong> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">NYSE: WMT</a>): It's off on retail numbers after the stock broke out of a four-month consolidation pattern on good volume. If the stock catches a bid, it is an indication that institutional investors are back stalking retail plays and would be bullish for the general market. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/energy-select-sector-spdr-fund/xle/ase">Energy ETF</a></strong> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/energy-select-sector-spdr-fund/xle/ase">AMEX: XLE</a>): Energy has recently broken a longer term trend going back to mid-2006. It is bouncing off recent lows on very light volume. If money continues to rotate out of this sector, finding a home in the likes of retail, housing and financials, again a bullish sign. I initiated a short position in XLE this morning. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase">Financial ETF</a></strong> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase">AMEX: XLF</a>): Financials have been and will continue to be the key to the market's future. After recapturing the 50-day moving average, this ETF is being brought down by <strong>AIG</strong> (AIG) and needs to regain its footing. Some consolidation is fine, but anything back below $20 would have me heading back towards the bunker. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-homebuilders-etf/xhb/ase">Homebuilders ETF</a></strong> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-homebuilders-etf/xhb/ase">AMEX: XHB</a>): The homebuilders continue to perk up and also remain a key to the future of the tape. They are probing green today above their 50-day moving average on decent early volume. A break here above yesterday's high going on to attack the $19.00 level is also a bullish sign. </p>
<p>These are things I am watching for which will give me my clues to start wading back into the market with real capital.</p>
<p><em>(Prof. Tatro has positions in WMT, XLE, XLF, XHB).</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/clues-can-be-found-in-wmt-etfs/">Clues can be found in WMT, ETFs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/clues-can-be-found-in-wmt-etfs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1278364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/07/clues-can-be-found-in-wmt-etfs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy</category><category>financial</category><category>homebuilders</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><category>xhb</category><category>xle</category><category>xlf</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cold comfort: only 13% of banks on FDIC watch list fail]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/cold-comfort-only-13-of-banks-on-fdic-watch-list-fail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/cold-comfort-only-13-of-banks-on-fdic-watch-list-fail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/cold-comfort-only-13-of-banks-on-fdic-watch-list-fail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p>When it comes to the banking industry, the good news just keeps coming. The head of the FDIC says that only about 13% of the banks on its watch list of troubled institutions actually fail. Except for the banks that go out of business, how could it get any better?</p>
<p>"We work with the primary regulator to give them extra care and attention, to nurse them back to health or to sell them off to another institution," said FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2825428920080728">according to</a> <em>Reuters. </em></p>
<p>The comments side-step the issue that the credit crisis is getting worse. The IMF <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=ao8IfKzWFWwQ&amp;refer=news">recently said</a> that it could not see a bottom for the housing market and that financial companies would end up with $1 trillion in write-offs before the troubles pass. Bill Gross, the head of huge bond house Pimco, has essentially said the same thing.</p>
<p>The comment from the FDIC chief may be accurate based on a snapshot of the market today. It fails to acknowledge that the current watch list is only the tip of the iceberg. </p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/cold-comfort-only-13-of-banks-on-fdic-watch-list-fail/">Cold comfort: only 13% of banks on FDIC watch list fail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2825428920080728>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/cold-comfort-only-13-of-banks-on-fdic-watch-list-fail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1269458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/29/cold-comfort-only-13-of-banks-on-fdic-watch-list-fail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>FDIC</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><category>subprime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Not a good time to buy American Express]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/not-a-good-time-to-buy-american-express/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/not-a-good-time-to-buy-american-express/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/not-a-good-time-to-buy-american-express/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/axp-american-express-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) saw a big sell-off in its shares during the after-hours session on Monday following the release of its second-quarter earnings <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/american-express-reports-second-quarter/rfid123625508">numbers</a>. The shares already closed down over 11%. <br /></p>
<p>It isn't difficult to comprehend this one. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=axp">Earnings.com</a>, Wall Street was hoping for the credit company to make 83 cents per share. American Express only delivered 57 cents per share from continuing operations. Not only did the company disappoint the Street by a very wide margin, but it disappointed itself, since that 57 cents per share represents a 35% drop compared to the bottom-line results achieved a year ago.</p>
<p>Yep, the financial crisis is still with us. American Express needed to significantly add to its credit reserves. Management stated that the economy is having a negative effect on its cardmembers, and that previous guidance can no longer be relied on. Translation: don't buy this stock! At least, that's my opinion. <br /></p>
<p>I simply can't see allocating investment funds to American Express at this point. If investors wanted to get some exposure to plastic, all they would need to do is consider <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">Visa</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/visa-inc/v/nys">V</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MasterCard</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a>). Both of these businesses are based primarily on transactions, not on credit risk. Whenever a card is used, these businesses get a little cut. And that adds up, my friends. Granted, both of these companies sold off on Monday and have been weak lately, and they have litigation risk, but I'd at least look at them for the long-term. Over time they should do well.</p>
<p>American Express, however, is way off my list of potential investment ideas. Not even going near this one. Name a timeframe (e.g. year-to-date, one-year, five-year, etc.), and you'll find that the stock is down. The economy is going to have to turn sharply before I even remotely consider it.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own any company mentioned; positions can change at any time.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/not-a-good-time-to-buy-american-express/">Not a good time to buy American Express</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/american-express-reports-second-quarter/rfid123625508>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/not-a-good-time-to-buy-american-express/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1263041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/not-a-good-time-to-buy-american-express/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Express</category><category>AmericanExpress</category><category>AXP</category><category>credit cards</category><category>credit markets</category><category>CreditCards</category><category>CreditMarkets</category><category>featured</category><category>financial</category><category>MA</category><category>MasterCard</category><category>V</category><category>Visa</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Bulls drive autos, yes autos, to win the day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/closing-bell-bulls-drive-autos-yes-autos-to-win-the-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/closing-bell-bulls-drive-autos-yes-autos-to-win-the-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/closing-bell-bulls-drive-autos-yes-autos-to-win-the-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fo/" rel="tag">Fortune Brands (FO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sndk/" rel="tag">SanDisk Corp (SNDK)</a></p>The bulls got to lead the first day of the quarter, although we would note that if today was the norm that trading volatility isn't slowing down regardless of the direction. Oil rose again toward session highs on tensions and the usual myriad of reasons we cite for oil rising (yes, it's that routine). Here are today's <em>unofficial closing</em> levels:<br />
<ul>
    <li>DJIA   11,381.77 (+31.51)</li>
    <li>S&amp;P500 1284.89 (+4.89)</li>
    <li>NASDAQ 2304.97 (+11.99)</li>
    <li>10YR T-Note 3.992% (+0.013%)</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/the-52-week-low.html">52-WEEK LOWS</a></li>
</ul>
We actually saw many <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/upgrades-come-t.html">financial sector upgrades</a> from research firms today, which sent many of the corresponding shares higher in what feels like a "for once" statement. We would caution that later in the day an analyst report did note other banks would <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/does-bank-of-am.html">need more capital</a> (again).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/closing-bell-bulls-drive-autos-yes-autos-to-win-the-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Bulls drive autos, yes autos, to win the day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/closing-bell-bulls-drive-autos-yes-autos-to-win-the-day/">Closing Bell: Bulls drive autos, yes autos, to win the day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/closing-bell-bulls-drive-autos-yes-autos-to-win-the-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1242738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/closing-bell-bulls-drive-autos-yes-autos-to-win-the-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alcohol</category><category>constellation brands</category><category>ConstellationBrands</category><category>financial</category><category>fortune brands</category><category>FortuneBrands</category><category>sandisk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup's bad news: Banks' worst period since Great Depression?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/citis-bad-news-banks-worst-period-since-great-depression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/citis-bad-news-banks-worst-period-since-great-depression/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/citis-bad-news-banks-worst-period-since-great-depression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/c-citigroup-logo.jpg" alt="" />Bloomberg News reports a blizzard of bad news about <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>). Its management team does not know what's going on with its Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) portfolio, and loan losses on the consumer side of its business are climbing fast.</p>
<p>I am most concerned about Citi's inability to quantify the CDO damage. According to <em><a href="http://www.dealbreaker.com/2008/01/the_kitchen_sink_does_not_incl.php#more">DealBreaker</a></em>, the conference call did not go well, with Citi's CFO <em>"having to admit many times that he either wouldn't comment or didn't know the answer to detailed questions about credit market exposure. Merrill's Gary Moskowitz asked about what the original par value of the CDO portfolio. Crittenden said he didn't know. How about specifics on modeling versus market tests? Nope, just more hand-waving!"</em><br /></p>
<p>Another analyst, Jon Fisher, who helps manage $22 billion at Minneapolis-based Fifth Third Asset Management said, "There are probably issues on their balance sheet that the management team, who's only really been running the company for about a month, doesn't even know about."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/citis-bad-news-banks-worst-period-since-great-depression/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup's bad news: Banks' worst period since Great Depression?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/citis-bad-news-banks-worst-period-since-great-depression/">Citigroup's bad news: Banks' worst period since Great Depression?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/citis-bad-news-banks-worst-period-since-great-depression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1087309/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/citis-bad-news-banks-worst-period-since-great-depression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hot stocks for '08: TD Ameritrade (AMTD)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/30/hot-stocks-for-08-td-ameritrade-amtd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/30/hot-stocks-for-08-td-ameritrade-amtd/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/30/hot-stocks-for-08-td-ameritrade-amtd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/ameritrade.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />As investors throughout the world get ready to usher in 2008, here is a stock pick that looks like it will be a big winner. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas">TD Ameritrade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas">AMTD</a>), the online broker, looks like it will be the big winner in the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*Trade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) fiasco. TD Ameritrade looks to pick up a whole bunch of accounts from the shamed online broker. In addition, after some clarity is shined on just how bad E*Trade's financial situation is, I would expect TD Ameritrade to swoop in and gobble up the retail brokerage business of E*Trade. They are sure to acquire it on the cheap, which makes TD Ameritrade all the more attractive. </p>
<p>With a PE under 19, and the stock trading just off the 52-week high, the stock has been hanging in during a period when the rest of the financials have gotten clobbered. Look for TD Ameritrade stock to be a strong performer in '08.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em>IsraelNewsletter.com</em></a><em>. DISCLOSURE: Writer has no position in any stock mentioned as of 12/30/07.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/30/hot-stocks-for-08-td-ameritrade-amtd/">Hot stocks for '08: TD Ameritrade (AMTD)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/30/hot-stocks-for-08-td-ameritrade-amtd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1073692/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/30/hot-stocks-for-08-td-ameritrade-amtd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AMTD</category><category>brokerage</category><category>ETFC</category><category>etrade</category><category>financial</category><category>TD ameritrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The lesser-of-two-evils pairs trade?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/the-lesser-of-two-evils-pairs-trade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/the-lesser-of-two-evils-pairs-trade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/the-lesser-of-two-evils-pairs-trade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/lessertwoevils.jpg" alt="" />It's no secret that financial and consumer stocks have been slammed this year. Since January, the S&amp;P financial sector has shed 21.3% while the S&amp;P consumer discretionary sector has lost 14.2%. That compares to a 2.2% gain in the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandp-500-index/%24inx/cmi?tabs=quotesandnews">S&amp;P 500 index</a>.</p>
<p>While it is likely far too early to call for a bottom in either group, a quick read of the technical relationship between the two sectors going back several years suggests it might nonetheless be time to bet on banks, brokers, and other financials while wagering on further weakness in the shares of companies that are most exposed to a slowdown in personal spending. </p>
<p>Arguably, this particular pairs-trade probably jibes with how traders are positioned and the near-term fundamental outlook. Right now, many people are afraid of what bombshell might hit the financial sector next. Yet as far as the economy goes, the majority of central bankers, analysts, and various Polyannas still seem to be expecting -- hoping -- that any slowdown we see will be mild, at worst.</p>
<p>In sentiment terms, at least, that suggests the former group has a decent amount of bad news priced in. In contrast, shares in the latter group could be vulnerable to downside surprises, especially given that we are now in the midst of the crucial holiday selling season.</p>
<p>One way to play it (depending on risk): buy the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">XLF</a>) and sell (sell-short) the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/select-sector-spdr-consumer-discretionary/xly/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund ETF</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/select-sector-spdr-consumer-discretionary/xly/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">XLY</a>).</p>
<p><em>Michael Panzner is a 25-year veteran of the global stock, bond, and currency markets and the author of</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/141959608X/thenewlawsoft-20">Financial Armageddon: Protecting Your Future from Four Impending Catastrophes</a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/032124785X/thenewlawsoft-20">The New Laws of the Stock Market Jungle</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/the-lesser-of-two-evils-pairs-trade/">The lesser-of-two-evils pairs trade?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/the-lesser-of-two-evils-pairs-trade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1065070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/the-lesser-of-two-evils-pairs-trade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer discretionary</category><category>financial</category><category>xlf</category><category>xly</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Panzner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
