You might think that since consumer prices have tumbled by near record percentages that this might lead to lower food prices. But much of that consumer price decline is attributable to lower energy prices -- after all oil peaked at $147 a barrel in July only to fall 63.5% to $53.63 yesterday.

Why won't food prices follow oil down? Many food producers panicked as corn and wheat prices peaked this summer -- locking in long term supply contracts at top prices. For instance, corn, which usually trades at $2 or $3 a bushel, pealed at $8 a bushel in June.

Although prices have since dropped to $3.50 a bushel, some food manufacturers locked in prices for corn and other commodities in the spring and summer, fearing that prices could go even higher. The result is that producers will pass on those higher costs in the form of food prices going up 7% to 9% in 2009.

A basket of 16 basic food items costs $48.68, up 10.5% from a year ago, the American Farm Bureau Federation said in a press release that marketwatch.com covered on Friday.

Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Friday many factors are driving grocery prices higher, including higher ingredient costs, higher energy prices, and rising demand for food in developing countries around the world (especially China, India, Russia, Brazil, and the Middle East).

A few grocery store tips:

Wang says that while there are many savvy shoppers in the states, many others are new to shopping. Wang, who worked in a grocery for three years while in college, offered his tips on how to lower your grocery bill:

• Stick to a shopping list and shun 'impulse' buys: Wang says this is perhaps the biggest money saver. "From the moment you walk in the store, grocery stores are designed to get you to buy more items than you plan to buy," Wang said. "You are bombarded with stimuli that tempts you to spend, and it works, so stick to your list. If it's not on the list, ask yourself if you need the item, or are buying merely on impulse."

• Coupon card: Most grocery chains offer a coupon card that automatically deducts for items on sale. Sign up for one and use it. But evaluate the coupons some cash registers dispense with a sales receipt. "Ask yourself if you need it or if it is on your list," Wang said.
  

• Evaluate buying in bulk. "Buying larger sizes usually lowers cost per food purchased but ask yourself if you will need and use the item," Wang said. "If the item is not your list, don't buy it, as you could be succumbing to an impulse buy, which will drive your food bill up."

There is an often-repeated joke in economists' circles that goes: Inflation is low, if you exclude food and energy prices. And of course, no one buys food or energy . . .

The above is a critique of the U.S. Federal Reserve's use of core inflation -- which excludes food and energy prices -- as a measure of lasting price changes in the U.S. economy.

Critics charge, "inflation is the sum of all products / services consumers use, not solely a portion." In essence, they argue that the Fed is underestimating inflation, creating a distorted picture of price conditions people face daily.

Still, a new research report by Michael Kiley, a Federal Reserve economist, supports the Fed's continued use of the core inflation metric. In Estimating the common trend rate of inflation for consumer prices and consumer prices excluding food and energy prices, Kiley's research reinforces the theory that total inflation historically contains more temporary changes in prices -- i.e. changes that could disappear -- than core inflation, thus supporting the continued use of core inflation.

In other words, core inflation is used by the Fed because it has been deemed a more-accurate predictor of long-term price changes or 'inflation over time' than total inflation, sometimes also referred to as 'headline inflation.'

Economist David H. Wang said he's by-and-large in agreement with Kiley's conclusions. "Core inflation is more indicative of long-term price changes. The problem occurs when you have periods of large price changes in food and energy, such as today, which pushes total inflation way up. Then the cry occurs that the Fed is not measuring inflation accurately," Wang said.

The reduction in global economic growth and growth expectations is leading to one benefit: a sharp decline in commodity prices, creating hope inflation may be peaking in many parts of the world, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday (subscription required).

Rice and palm oil, two commodities critical for the developing world, are both down about 40% since May, while the world's most vital commodity, crude oil, is down abut 23%, The Journal reported.

An end to surging commodity prices?

Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks Monday that while the commodity price-lower trend is still young, continued commodity price declines would be a welcomed sight, provided they don't drop too much.

"The pullback is welcome because many commodities had reached prohibitive levels, hindering commerce and really hurting the modest budgets of the poor/working poor in developing countries," Langan said. "However, too much of a price slide in commodities would be a sign of a pronounced global economic slowdown, which is something we don't want."

Further, Langan said that while regulators in various nations probe 'speculator' activity and alleged price manipulation in commodity markets, he argues that many of the price rises are consistent with historical price booms in other asset classes / sectors.

Europe's economy contracted in Q2 for the first time since the euro was launched more than 10 years ago, as exports underperformed and energy costs cut into consumers' disposable income, Eurostat, the European Union's statistics office announced (PDF) Thursday.

Euro-zone Q2 GDP fell 0.2% and EU27 Q2 GDP -- which includes nations in the European Union but not formally a part of the euro currency system -- fell 0.1%, Eurostat said. In Q1, Euro-zone GDP rose 0.7%.

Further, on a year-over-year basis, euro-zone GDP increased 1.5%, with inflation running at about 4.0%, well above the European Central Bank's 2.0% annual limit.

Economist: 'Bad news for global economy'

Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Thursday Europe's slowing economy "is bad news for the global economy."

"This is bad news because we need European growth to prevent a global economic slowing. But the economies in two major European economies are clearly slowing. Germany's GDP fell 0.5% in the first quarter, and France's fell 0.3% in the second quarter, so given their make-up in the euro-zone, Europe has experienced a pronounced slowing," Wang said.

U.S. producer prices soared a seasonally-adjusted 1.8% in June, the U.S Labor Department announced Tuesday, as rising energy prices continued to increase wholesale costs at an alarming rate.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected the June PPI index to rise 1.4%. Producer prices increased 1.4% in May and 0.2% in April.

The core rate, which excludes food and energy costs, increased 0.2%, the Labor Department said, below the Bloomberg News 0.3% consensus estimate.

Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks Tuesday the June PPI is another unfortunate data point for the economy, but it's not as bad as it appears. "The report is bad, but not as bad as it could have been. Energy really drove the index higher. If you took out gasoline prices, PPI would be down a half percentage point," Dawson said. "That said, energy prices are still rising at an alarming rate and they're a cost concern for businesses and individuals alike."

The European Central Bank's quarter point interest rate increase has been called 'counter-productive,' 'unnecessary,' even 'self-defeating.'

All of which begs the question, why did the ECB last Thursday increase interest rates so soon? (The ECB increased its key interest rate, the refinance rate, a quarter point to 4.25%, last Thursday.)

One argument is euro zone inflation, presently running at about a 3.7% annualized rate. That's well above the ECB's 2% inflation limit.

The need to fulfill promises of increased aid for Africa, and a general agreement between the United States and Russia on an approach to Iran's nuclear program took center stage as leaders from the Group of Eight industrial nations met Monday in Japan, The Associated Press reported.

President Bush, attending his last summit as a sitting U.S. president, underscored the importance of providing aid for Africa, calling on wealthy nations to provide mosquito netting and other aid to prevent needless deaths, the AP reported.

Basic items - - even equipment as basic as mosquito netting - - can reduce mortality rates in sections of Africa. Mosquito netting prevents children and others from dieing of bites from disease-carrying mosquitoes.

In 2005 the G-8 pledged to increase global aid to $130 billion, and increase assistance to Africa to $50 billion. ONE, a nonpartisan group working to end extreme poverty, predicted that the U.S. and the United Kingdom will meet their commitments, while France, Italy, Germany and Canada are off the mark, Bloomberg News reported Monday.

Increased global food aid likely

Economist Glen Langan, whose specializations include agricultural economics, said increased aid for food and agricultural development will likely be announced by G-8 leaders at the summit, or soon thereafter, due to the rising cost of food's impact on poorer nations. "The aid will be targeted to meeting basic needs first, but with an eye toward directing some funds to self-sustaining agriculture," Langan said, adding that Africa "has the potential to achieve food production gains greater than South America."

If you believe the Dow Jones Industrial Average is a leading indicator of economic conditions six to nine months ahead, Tuesday's Dow activity is not good news.

The Dow officially entered bear market territory when a Tuesday morning decline drove the world's most followed stock market average beyond the level indicating a bear market -- down 20% from the October 9, 2007 high of 14,165.

What exactly is a 'bear market'?

Technical analysts, economists, and others argue that a 10% decline -- called a correction -- is a normal pull-back or pause in a bull market, a market where most stocks are likely to rise.

However, a 20% or greater decline is not healthy. Technical analysts say it indicates investors and traders are not simply taking short-term profits, but are concerned about the prospect for stocks in the quarters ahead -- three to nine months out -- and are exiting the market, in favor (historically) of bonds and cash.

For the above reason, 20% declines are usually interpreted by market advisors and participants as a sign that stocks are likely to be under pressure in the months ahead.

Sometimes during a crisis the United States rushes toward a solution, only to find that the action was not only not a panacea, it was, in fact, ill-conceived and harmful.

The late British Prime Minister Winston Churchill alluded to this when he noted that, "In the end, America will do the right thing . . . after she's exhausted all other possibilities."

That may very well be the case with corn-based ethanol.

Initially heralded as a renewable fuel that reduces foreign oil imports, it now appears that a powerful coalition is building against corn-based ethanol -- a problematic energy source, in economist Glen Langan's interpretation.

A ' tax dollar not well spent'

The U.S. Government (which means you, the taxpayer) heavily subsidies ethanol from corn production via payments to farmers, Langan said. "The tax dollar is not well spent, either from an environmental standpoint or an energy policy standpoint," he said.

Former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan believes financial market turmoil that disrupted the bond market and created liquidity concerns may extend into 2009, Bloomberg News reported Tuesday.

However, Greenspan said the Fed's efforts in March to revive credit have reduced instability. "Things do at this particular stage look a little bit better," Greenspan told Bloomberg News via a conference call, but added that financial doldrums are likely to linger a "good number of months or into next year."

Further, when asked if the U.S. economy was in a recession, Greenspan said, "We are on the brink," Reuters reported Tuesday.

Greenspan's remarks occur one day before the now Ben Bernanke-led Fed announces it interest rate decision, on Wednesday at 2:15 p.m. EDT. The Fed is widely expected to keep interest rates the same, while in its accompanying statement also striking a balance between concern over rising inflation and a pronounced economic stall.

U.S. stock prices are likely to fall further because record energy and food prices are constraining consumer spending, suggesting a worse-than-average recession, Merrill Lynch's U.S. sector strategist said Monday, Bloomberg News reported.

Brian Belski, Merrill's U.S. sector strategist, said this is not "your average recession," and that he would "urge caution for investors attempting to call the bottom in the current environment," Bloomberg News reported.

On Monday the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed down 0.33 points to 11,842.36. The Dow has fallen about 1,400 points since trading above 13,100 in late April and again in mid-May. The Dow has also been below its 50-day moving average -- which technical analysts believe to be an indicator of short-term support or resistance -- for more than two weeks. The Dow also has been below its 200-day moving average -- a technical indicator of longer-term market support / resistance -- for about six months. Technical analysts note that a strong market and Dow would consistently remain above its 200-day moving average; a bearish market, the reverse.

Bearish on DJIA

Economist Peter Dawson echoed Belski's evaluation and said the March -- May rise in the S&P 500 and the DJIA was not rooted in strong evidence, fundamental or technical.

"Basically, for the last five months or so, the U.S. economy has been treading water, going sideways. At the same time, we had a Dow rally off the 11,800 lows in March. That suggested trouble if GDP growth did not accelerate in Q2," Dawson said. "It hasn't so far, and the Dow sold off. I agree with Belski in that there's considerable risk to the downside for the market given the trend in consumer spending and the overall risks to the economy."

During the roaring 1990s, undergraduates aspired to be entrepreneurs who would someday start their own company, or aspired to be investment bankers.

If the initial data points of the 21st century are predictive, undergraduates may want to shift their career goals to farming and agriculture.

Meat and dairy prices, already forced higher by rising food demand in emerging markets and sky-high energy prices, are likely to move higher still, due to flooding in the Midwest U.S., The Associated Press reported Monday.

Already high corn costs had compelled farmers to reduce animal production, resulting in higher prices for these products. Now, beef, poultry, pork, eggs, cheese and milk prices are expected to rise even more, as owners are forced to slaughter more livestock to cope with the higher costs of raising their animals, or as they go out of business.

Livestock producers' costs soar

Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks Monday the livestock segment is facing its biggest transformation -- and highest costs -- in more than 30 years. "Corn costs have doubled, from $4 a bushel to $8, while energy costs have gone through the roof. This will force many producers out of the market," Langan said. "Only the most efficient, modern producers will survive, with a few exceptions. That will easily push meat and poultry prices 20% higher or more from current levels. Dairy is harder to predict, because it's more localized, but there will be dairy price increases, too."

Food manufacturers promised Mexico's government on Wednesday they would freeze prices on more than 150 food products to help families cope with the rising cost of food, The Associated Press reported Thursday.

Mexico President Felipe Calderon said prices for goods including beans, canned tuna, fruit juices, coffee, ketchup and canned tomatoes will remain fixed until December 31, 2008, The AP reported. Calderon blamed rising food prices on surging global energy prices, food demand in China, and the use of corn for ethanol production.

Good intention, wrong method

Economist Glen Langan said he agreed with the need for food assistance for Mexico's poor, but disagreed with the mechanism.

"A more effective program would be a larger cash payment or food subsidy to citizens," Langan said. "The pricing mechanism should be kept in place, because it has many benefits. Cash payments or subsidies to poor residents are much more targeted and don't provide a benefit to those who don't need it. [Mexico President] Calderon did announce a monthly subsidy, 120 pesos [$11.60], but it isn't large enough."

Just call it stagflation, updated for the globalization era.

Oil's record, 5-year rise, combined with increasing food costs, have increased inflation, reduced disposable income, and slowed the U.S. economy to a crawl, when combined with the effects of the end of the housing boom.

The above sounds like a prescription for a replay of the 1970s' stagflation era, but is it? Not quite, according to Stephen Cecchetti, professor of economics at the Brandeis University International Business School.

Cecchetti told Bloomberg News Thursday a more-flexible economy, with lower stockpiles of goods, increased fuel efficiency, increased worker productivity, and lower wage increases for employees are among the economic differences separating the 1970s and 2008 U.S. economies. As a result, Cecchetti doesn't see a repeat of the 1970s' high inflation/high unemployment levels.

Economist David H. Wang concurred with the above conclusion, but argued that the two major factors in the nation's enhanced ability to cope with large increases in commodity costs and other negative economic factors are energy efficiency and worker productivity.