<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />Some of the jobs that have disappeared through this <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/recession/">recession</a> are gone forever, it seems. Even when the market turns, and even gains momentum,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-19-high-unemployment-remains_N.htm"> we could be stuck with a fairly weak employment market for a while</a>. The recovery will take longer than we'd like, putting more distance between now and the top of the next market run. We've lost 7.2 million jobs since December 2007, and the predictions of some economists <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/">that we'll get them back by 2014 may actually seem optimistic</a>. </p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Four_Reasons_We_re_Stuck_with_High_Unemployment_For_a_While'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>    Unemployment is at 9.8%, and it's expected to clear 10% early next year. Then, we have the specter of a jobless recovery with which to contend. "Full employment" is often considered to be an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentrate/">unemployment rate</a> of 4% to 5%, but it could be a while before we get there. The last downturn, following the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/dotcom/">dotcom</a> bust, resulted in a peak unemployment rate of 6.3% in 2003 ... and we're already well past that.
<p> </p>
<p>Why is the recovery going to be such a grind? Check out the four major reasons after the jump. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/">Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-19-high-unemployment-remains_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank loans</category><category>BankLoans</category><category>banks</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>dotcom</category><category>economic growth</category><category>EconomicGrowth</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosed</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>job</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>JoblessRate</category><category>JoblessRecovery</category><category>joblosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>MortgageDefaults</category><category>mortgages</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gov't aid can't prevent H1 foreclosure record]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" alt="" />Home <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/foreclosure/">foreclosure</a> filings in the United States hit a record 1.9 million in the first half of 2009, according to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/RealtyTrac/">RealtyTrac</a> --- on more than 1.5 million properties. Again, unemployment is one of the primary culprits, as a lack of income makes it pretty tough to bring a loan at risk of default up to date. The number of filings is up 9% from the second half of 2008 and up almost 15% from the same period last year. </p>
<p>Last month, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56F0XK20090716" target="_blank">foreclosure filings were up 5% relative to May and up 33% from June 2008</a>. The month's action was the third highest on record, and it was the fourth month in a row in which there were filings on more than 300,000 properties.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gov't aid can't prevent H1 foreclosure record</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/">Gov't aid can't prevent H1 foreclosure record</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56F0XK20090716>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099733/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>foreclosed</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>homeowners</category><category>homeownership</category><category>housing</category><category>housing market</category><category>HousingMarket</category><category>inthenews</category><category>real estate</category><category>real estate market</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>RealEstateMarket</category><category>realtytrac</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$8.6 billion in foreclosed homes weigh down bank balance sheets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" /><em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aMz0dl3IdwjU&amp;refer=news">Bloomberg News</a></em> reports that the 8,500 banks and S&amp;Ls in the U.S. hold $8.56 billion worth of foreclosed homes on their balance sheets. And most of those $6.9 billion, are held by two companies -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Fannie Mae</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FNM</font></a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Freddie Mac</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FRE</font></a>). They hold 81% of the foreclosed properties but 50% of the mortgages -- more evidence that Fannie and Freddie financed far more bad loans than their standards should have permitted.</p>
<p>This inventory of foreclosed homes weighs down the entire housing market. Generally, such homes sell for a 20% discount -- and that's not good for the prices in the neighborhood. <em>Bloomberg</em> reports that the prices received for foreclosed properties have declined -- from 93% in 2005 to 74% of the unpaid mortgage principal. Moreover, unless the bank pays to cut the grass and otherwise maintain the foreclosed home, its poor curb appeal taints the neighborhood a bit for potential buyers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$8.6 billion in foreclosed homes weigh down bank balance sheets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/">$8.6 billion in foreclosed homes weigh down bank balance sheets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aMz0dl3IdwjU&amp;refer=news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1264561/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fannie mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>fnm</category><category>foreclosed</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosurebustour</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>foreclosuresforsale</category><category>fre</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:48:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
