<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[GMAC Investigation Signals Possible Next Meltdown]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/gmac-investigation-signals-possible-next-meltdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/gmac-investigation-signals-possible-next-meltdown/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/gmac-investigation-signals-possible-next-meltdown/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosurestory.jpg" />Imagine, if you would, that you lost your home to foreclosure, but you later learned that the entity that seized your property likely had no right to take it. It sounds unbelievable, right? Well, a recently initiated investigation involving GMAC indicates that may be exactly what has happened in tens of thousands of foreclosure cases across the country.</p>
<p>The investigation, undertaken by the Florida Attorney General, is examining three law firms for allegedly providing fraudulent affidavits  that identify who holds the original mortgage note in foreclosure cases.  According to a report from NPR, this action has caused GMAC to suspend  pending eviction and foreclosure activities.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/gmac-investigation-signals-possible-next-meltdown/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GMAC Investigation Signals Possible Next Meltdown</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/gmac-investigation-signals-possible-next-meltdown/">GMAC Investigation Signals Possible Next Meltdown</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130002815>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/gmac-investigation-signals-possible-next-meltdown/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19642445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/gmac-investigation-signals-possible-next-meltdown/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>Foreclosures</category><category>GMAC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Foreclosure Hurdles]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/new-foreclosure-hurdles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/new-foreclosure-hurdles/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/new-foreclosure-hurdles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/foreclosurebig.jpg" />According to a <em>Wall Street Journal</em> article Monday, the U.S. Treasury is considering <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704454304575081841444972582.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5" target="_blank">new guidelines for mortgage lenders to follow</a>. Reportedly, these guidelines will give troubled borrowers more time to qualify for the federal program that is aimed at avoiding foreclosures. The proposals make loan-servicing companies that collect payments and handle foreclosures to give borrowers 30 days in order to respond after they are denied a modification of the terms of their loan. During the 30-day period borrowers could appeal the decision and the loan-servicing companies could not put the home on a foreclosure auction. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/new-foreclosure-hurdles/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New Foreclosure Hurdles</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/new-foreclosure-hurdles/">New Foreclosure Hurdles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/new-foreclosure-hurdles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19369624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/new-foreclosure-hurdles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>HAMP</category><category>housing crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Even the good die young? High-quality mortgages approaching foreclosure]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/even-the-good-die-young-high-quality-mortgages-approaching-fore/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/even-the-good-die-young-high-quality-mortgages-approaching-fore/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/even-the-good-die-young-high-quality-mortgages-approaching-fore/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="147" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosurestory.jpg" alt="" />The loans that got us into this mess were generally the first to fall. Variable rate mortgages written without documentation for people with sketchy credit histories shocked nobody as their slide became an avalanche. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34039065/ns/business-real_estate/" target="_blank">But, the good stuff is starting to follow</a>. An increasing amount of fixed rate mortgages offered to borrowers with solid credit histories are feeling their ways to foreclosure. Blame unemployment for this one. When people can't work, it gets pretty hard to pay the mortgage.</p>
<p>Fixed rate, high quality mortgages had a foreclosure a year ago. Last quarter, it jumped to 33%, according to a <a href="http://www.mbaa.org/" target="_blank">Mortgage Bankers Association</a> report. As this happened, the amount of homeowners behind on their payments or in foreclosure just set another record high ... for the ninth month in a row. Subprime mortgages are headed in the other direction. Low quality adjustable rate mortgages are now 16% of new foreclosures -- compared to 35% last year. And, more than 18% of Federal Housing Administration loans are anywhere from one payment behind to in foreclosure, with California, Nevada, Arizona and Florida worst off: together, they accounted for 44% of new foreclosures.<br />  <br />   </p>
<center><iframe width="425" scrolling="no" height="339" frameborder="0" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/34039557#34039557"></iframe>
<p style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; text-align: center; margin-top: 5px; width: 425px; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous; color: rgb(153, 153, 153); font-size: 11px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted rgb(153, 153, 153); height: 13px; color: rgb(87, 153, 219) ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; text-decoration: none ! important;">Breaking News</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted rgb(153, 153, 153); height: 13px; color: rgb(87, 153, 219) ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; text-decoration: none ! important;">World News</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted rgb(153, 153, 153); height: 13px; color: rgb(87, 153, 219) ! important; font-weight: normal ! important; text-decoration: none ! important;">News about the Economy</a></p>
<div> </div>
</center><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/even-the-good-die-young-high-quality-mortgages-approaching-fore/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Even the good die young? High-quality mortgages approaching foreclosure</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/even-the-good-die-young-high-quality-mortgages-approaching-fore/">Even the good die young? High-quality mortgages approaching foreclosure</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34039065/ns/business-real_estate/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/even-the-good-die-young-high-quality-mortgages-approaching-fore/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247954/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/even-the-good-die-young-high-quality-mortgages-approaching-fore/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>default</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>Foreclosures</category><category>home prices</category><category>housing</category><category>housing market</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job market</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage bankers association</category><category>mortgage rates</category><category>MortgageBankersAssociation</category><category>MortgageRates</category><category>mortgages</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstateMarket</category><category>RealEstateMarkets</category><category>subprime</category><category>subprime lending</category><category>subprime loans</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><category>SubprimeLending</category><category>SubprimeLoans</category><category>SubprimeMortgages</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fannie Mae will rent to owners in foreclosure]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/foreclosure.jpg" width="200" height="146" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) has initiated a new <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125743289932030933.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_news">Deed to Lease program</a> in which homeowners facing foreclosure will be able to stay in their homes as renters.</p>
<p>During the first half of the year, Fannie Mae has acquired 57,000 homes through foreclosure. These are owners who do not qualify for mortgage restructuring. They must demonstrate that they could not pay their mortgage but can pay rent. The rents paid are lower than their previous mortgage payment.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fannie Mae will rent to owners in foreclosure</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/">Fannie Mae will rent to owners in foreclosure</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19226369/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/fannie-mae-will-rent-to-owners-in-foreclosure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Deed to Lease</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>housing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />Some of the jobs that have disappeared through this <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/recession/">recession</a> are gone forever, it seems. Even when the market turns, and even gains momentum,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-19-high-unemployment-remains_N.htm"> we could be stuck with a fairly weak employment market for a while</a>. The recovery will take longer than we'd like, putting more distance between now and the top of the next market run. We've lost 7.2 million jobs since December 2007, and the predictions of some economists <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/">that we'll get them back by 2014 may actually seem optimistic</a>. </p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Four_Reasons_We_re_Stuck_with_High_Unemployment_For_a_While'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>    Unemployment is at 9.8%, and it's expected to clear 10% early next year. Then, we have the specter of a jobless recovery with which to contend. "Full employment" is often considered to be an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentrate/">unemployment rate</a> of 4% to 5%, but it could be a while before we get there. The last downturn, following the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/dotcom/">dotcom</a> bust, resulted in a peak unemployment rate of 6.3% in 2003 ... and we're already well past that.
<p> </p>
<p>Why is the recovery going to be such a grind? Check out the four major reasons after the jump. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/">Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-19-high-unemployment-remains_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank loans</category><category>BankLoans</category><category>banks</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>dotcom</category><category>economic growth</category><category>EconomicGrowth</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosed</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>job</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>JoblessRate</category><category>JoblessRecovery</category><category>joblosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>MortgageDefaults</category><category>mortgages</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Roubini: Markets are up 'too much, too fast']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/roubini-markets-are-up-too-much-too-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/roubini-markets-are-up-too-much-too-fast/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/roubini-markets-are-up-too-much-too-fast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/seesaw2.jpg" width="220" height="160" />Which way is the stock market headed, up or down? That question is on the minds of many investors these days.</p>
<p>We've a 50% run up since the January lows. Nouriel Roubini said: "<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aGDRFBUdT3iY">Markets have gone up too much, too fast.</a>" I see the risk of a correction, especially when the markets now realize that the recovery is not rapid and V-shaped, but more like U-shaped.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/roubini-markets-are-up-too-much-too-fast/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Roubini: Markets are up 'too much, too fast'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/roubini-markets-are-up-too-much-too-fast/">Roubini: Markets are up 'too much, too fast'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/roubini-markets-are-up-too-much-too-fast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/roubini-markets-are-up-too-much-too-fast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>foreclosure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PE</category><category>Roubini</category><category>stock market</category><category>unemployment</category><category>valuations</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gov't aid can't prevent H1 foreclosure record]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" alt="" />Home <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/foreclosure/">foreclosure</a> filings in the United States hit a record 1.9 million in the first half of 2009, according to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/RealtyTrac/">RealtyTrac</a> --- on more than 1.5 million properties. Again, unemployment is one of the primary culprits, as a lack of income makes it pretty tough to bring a loan at risk of default up to date. The number of filings is up 9% from the second half of 2008 and up almost 15% from the same period last year. </p>
<p>Last month, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56F0XK20090716" target="_blank">foreclosure filings were up 5% relative to May and up 33% from June 2008</a>. The month's action was the third highest on record, and it was the fourth month in a row in which there were filings on more than 300,000 properties.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gov't aid can't prevent H1 foreclosure record</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/">Gov't aid can't prevent H1 foreclosure record</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE56F0XK20090716>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099733/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/gov-t-aid-can-t-prevent-h1-foreclosure-record/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout</category><category>foreclosed</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>homeowners</category><category>homeownership</category><category>housing</category><category>housing market</category><category>HousingMarket</category><category>inthenews</category><category>real estate</category><category>real estate market</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>RealEstateMarket</category><category>realtytrac</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New home construction jumps in May]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-home-construction-jumps-in-may/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-home-construction-jumps-in-may/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-home-construction-jumps-in-may/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/homebuilders.jpg" alt="May Home Construction" />It was the largest jump in three months, as new home construction <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/home-construction-jumps-172-percent/528606">increased by 17.2%</a> during the last month.<br /><br />The increase was much higher than analysts had been expecting, and last month we moved up to an annual rate of 532,000 units... well above the 500,000 units that had been forecast.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-home-construction-jumps-in-may/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New home construction jumps in May</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-home-construction-jumps-in-may/">New home construction jumps in May</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-home-construction-jumps-in-may/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19069026/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/new-home-construction-jumps-in-may/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>home prices</category><category>home sales</category><category>HomePrices</category><category>HomeSales</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Foreclosures continue to mount]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-continue-to-mount/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-continue-to-mount/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-continue-to-mount/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-down-slightly-but-no-signs-of-stabilization-yet/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/foreclosure.png" /></a>The good news is that there was a 6% drop in foreclosures from April to May. That is the good news, but the bad news is that May was the third straight month in a row for <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-down-slightly-but-no-signs-of-stabilization-yet/">foreclosures topping 300,000</a>.<br /><br />RealtyTrac, which is the firm responsible for these figures stated that the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/11/AR2009061101098.html?hpid=topnews">exact number of foreclosure filings</a> during the month was 321,480.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-continue-to-mount/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Foreclosures continue to mount</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-continue-to-mount/">Foreclosures continue to mount</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-continue-to-mount/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19064474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/foreclosures-continue-to-mount/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic slowdown</category><category>EconomicSlowdown</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>home sales</category><category>homes</category><category>HomeSales</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Three words to stall foreclosure: 'Produce the note']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/three-words-to-stall-foreclosure-produce-the-note/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/three-words-to-stall-foreclosure-produce-the-note/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/three-words-to-stall-foreclosure-produce-the-note/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/foreclosure.jpg" alt="" />Are you in foreclosure proceedings? If so, you can stay in your house longer than you might have thought. All you have to do is tell the bank to hand you a copy of the mortgage contract that proves you are on the hook to pay and specifies the terms of the foreclosure. As long as the bank cannot deliver you that contract, you can stay in the house.</p>
<p>I am not a lawyer; nor am I going to play one here. But if you tell the bank to <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hLOuvy9fguykC2NydTDrkqqyybvQD96DHN5G0">"produce the note,"</a> it must deliver you the paper copy of the contract. And thanks to the way the mortgage market has changed in the last few decades, that simple request could be difficult to fulfill. That's because most mortgages used to get sold to investment banks who packaged them into mortgage-backed securities and sold them to investors around the world.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/three-words-to-stall-foreclosure-produce-the-note/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Three words to stall foreclosure: 'Produce the note'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/three-words-to-stall-foreclosure-produce-the-note/">Three words to stall foreclosure: 'Produce the note'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/three-words-to-stall-foreclosure-produce-the-note/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1473687/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/three-words-to-stall-foreclosure-produce-the-note/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>mortgage note</category><category>MortgageNote</category><category>stalling foreclosure</category><category>StallingForeclosure</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Foreclosures to rise 125% by 2010; jobless claims at 26-year high]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/11/foreclosures-to-rise-125-by-2010-jobless-claims-at-26-year-hig/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/11/foreclosures-to-rise-125-by-2010-jobless-claims-at-26-year-hig/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/11/foreclosures-to-rise-125-by-2010-jobless-claims-at-26-year-hig/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />The deflation drumbeat continues. As prices drop, businesses produce less and they cut the people doing the producing. With the exception of stocks and oil, it seems that nowhere are prices falling faster than in houses -- slashing $10 trillion in consumer wealth. And the spike in foreclosures adds more supply to the market for houses, just as demand keeps falling.</p>
<p>The foreclosure forecasts and initial unemployment claims figures released today are indeed sobering. The <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28035238/">spike in foreclosures is expected</a> to come from Pay Option mortgages, which let borrowers pay less than they owe each month and add that amount into the principal. But the Pay Option resets the rate upward when the new principal rises above 110% of the original amount. </p>
<p>Thanks in part to a 63% -- or $1,053 -- monthly increase in the current $1,672 average payment, foreclosures are expected to rise 125% to 3.6 million by 2010 over the three million that have occurred since 2006. Meanwhile, initial applications for jobless benefits rose to <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28172888/">573,000</a> in the week ending December 6 -- 9% more than the expected 525,000 -- from 515,000 the week before. <br /></p>
<p>If this is what an <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/08/20040809-9.html">Ownership Society</a> is all about, maybe it's time to forget about Ownership and create an Affordership Society where people live within their means instead of borrowing to buy things they can't really afford.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of </em><a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits</em> <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><the letter="" cohan=""></the></a>. </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/11/foreclosures-to-rise-125-by-2010-jobless-claims-at-26-year-hig/">Foreclosures to rise 125% by 2010; jobless claims at 26-year high</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28035238/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/11/foreclosures-to-rise-125-by-2010-jobless-claims-at-26-year-hig/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1398161/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/11/foreclosures-to-rise-125-by-2010-jobless-claims-at-26-year-hig/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>housing</category><category>initial claims</category><category>InitialClaims</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>JoblessClaims</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Freddie Mac warned of possible delisting by NYSE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/freddie-mac-warned-of-possible-delisting-by-nyse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/freddie-mac-warned-of-possible-delisting-by-nyse/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/freddie-mac-warned-of-possible-delisting-by-nyse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">Freddie Mac</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys">FRE</a>) said today that it received a notice from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), warning that the mortgage firm <a href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/markets/market_news/article.jsp?content=D94JCO4O1&amp;utm_source=markets&amp;utm_medium=rss">could be delisted</a> due to its rock-bottom share price. FRE has been trading below $1 for more than 30 days now, and must notify the exchange by December 2 whether it intends to rectify the problem.</p>
<p>If Freddie does decide to meet the NYSE's listing requirements, it will have until mid-May to address the share-price issue; if not, its common stock and preferred stock are subject to suspension and delisting. In a statement, Freddie Mac said it's "currently working with its conservator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to explore options relating to this deficiency and has not yet determined its response."</p>
<p>Earlier this week, Freddie's sister <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) received an identical warning from the NYSE. The troubled siblings hit the headlines for somewhat more respectable reasons earlier this morning, when the pair announced they would <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/stocks-in-the-news-c-dell-crm-gps-gm-f-fnm/">temporarily halt foreclosures</a> during the holiday season.</p>
<p>After opening broadly higher this morning, FRE has fallen to a 6% loss at 46 cents per share. Sibling Fannie is faring better today; that stock is up roughly 9% at last check -- though today's gain takes the per-share price only as high as 36 cents.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>. She is featured in the video series </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx"><em>Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</em></a><em> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/freddie-mac-warned-of-possible-delisting-by-nyse/">Freddie Mac warned of possible delisting by NYSE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/freddie-mac-warned-of-possible-delisting-by-nyse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379312/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/freddie-mac-warned-of-possible-delisting-by-nyse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>delisting</category><category>Fannie Mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>FNM</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>FRE</category><category>Freddie Mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage</category><category>NYSE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Simple California law cuts foreclosures 50% in Los Angeles]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/simple-california-law-cuts-foreclosures-50-in-los-angeles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/simple-california-law-cuts-foreclosures-50-in-los-angeles/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/simple-california-law-cuts-foreclosures-50-in-los-angeles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/property_taxes_snapshot.jpg" />How cutthroat have mortgage lenders been? I'd say on the pirates-and-vikings level, if data from Los Angeles this month is any indication. After a new law went into effect in early July requiring lenders to contact homeowners and attempt to avoid foreclosure <em>before</em> initiating the process, October foreclosures fell sharply, based on newly-scheduled home auctions (most foreclosures take 90 to 120 days to complete).<br /><br />The law, however, only requires a 30-day waiting period to attempt to work things out, and does not ask the lenders to provide any proof of the options it considered; only a piece of paper evidencing attempt to contact the homeowner (which, it would seem, could be as limited as a phone message but would probably take the form of a registered letter). There does not seem to be any way to make sure that the intention behind the contact was to find a creative solution to foreclosure and many critics claim that the <a href="http://www.nowpublic.com/world/new-california-legislation-will-it-stop-foreclosures-or-just-delay-them-0">effect of the law will only be a 30-day delay</a>.<br /><br />Indeed, all observers are forecasting a rise in foreclosures for November that is roughly equal to the decline in October. Has anything been gained, other than a few weeks' of respite from homelessness and a momentary decrease in the supply of cheap homes? I doubt it.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/simple-california-law-cuts-foreclosures-50-in-los-angeles/">Simple California law cuts foreclosures 50% in Los Angeles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/simple-california-law-cuts-foreclosures-50-in-los-angeles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1362003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/simple-california-law-cuts-foreclosures-50-in-los-angeles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>los angeles</category><category>LosAngeles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Existing home sales jump, but are we out of the woods just yet?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/25/existing-home-sales-jump-but-are-we-out-of-the-woods-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/25/existing-home-sales-jump-but-are-we-out-of-the-woods-just-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/25/existing-home-sales-jump-but-are-we-out-of-the-woods-just-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/sold-sign.jpg" alt="" />In the current housing market, it has been hard to find any sort of silver lining, but we do see a little positive news today, as <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/real-estate/_a/bbdp/existing-home-sales-up-31-percent/146573">existing home sales in July jumped</a> more than expected, mainly due to lower home prices.<br /><br />During July, sales of existing homes rose by 3.1%. This was well above the 1.6% that Wall Street was hoping to see, but analysts caution against assuming that this is a sign that the market has finally bottomed out. Despite beating Wall Street estimates, we still have to consider the fact that home sales were over 13% lower than the same period a year ago.<br /><br />While we can view the July sales figures as promising, we must also take a minute to look at home inventories, and here the picture is not so rosy. Here we see that the number of unsold single family homes is running at all time highs. Currently the market is trying to deal with a total of 4.67 million unsold homes. This is the highest level that we have seen since 1968 when the National Association of Realtors started monitoring the data.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/25/existing-home-sales-jump-but-are-we-out-of-the-woods-just-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Existing home sales jump, but are we out of the woods just yet?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/25/existing-home-sales-jump-but-are-we-out-of-the-woods-just-yet/">Existing home sales jump, but are we out of the woods just yet?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/25/existing-home-sales-jump-but-are-we-out-of-the-woods-just-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1294300/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/25/existing-home-sales-jump-but-are-we-out-of-the-woods-just-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>existing home sales</category><category>ExistingHomeSales</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>home sales</category><category>HomeSales</category><category>housing</category><category>housing prices</category><category>HousingPrices</category><category>mortgages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Donald Trump bails Ed McMahon out of foreclosure mess]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/donald-trump-bails-ed-mcmahon-out-of-foreclosure-mess/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/donald-trump-bails-ed-mcmahon-out-of-foreclosure-mess/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/donald-trump-bails-ed-mcmahon-out-of-foreclosure-mess/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trmp/" rel="tag">Trump Entertainment Resorts (TRMP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p>Donald Trump, the Clown Prince of Capitalism and Chairman of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trump-entertainment-resorts-inc/trmp/nas">Trump Entertainment Resorts</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trump-entertainment-resorts-inc/trmp/nas">TRMP</a>), is back in the news. The Associated Press <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hnRDS41TT3Iy0z4ISL2-0fOVA8pQD92IGA780">reports</a> that he'll be bailing out Ed McMahon, the former Johnny Carson sidekick who defaulted on $4.8 million in loans on his Beverly Hills home.<br /><br />Trump <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-hmw-hotpropmcmahon14-2008aug15,0,204866.story">told</a> <em>The Los Angeles Times</em> that he didn't know McMahon personally and is motivated by "compassion. . . When I was at the Wharton School of Business I'd watch him every night. How could this happen?"<br /><br />Holy cow! When I read this story, I thought "Finally! I'll have a chance to do a nice piece on Donald Trump." Wrong. I am actually going to make history here and <em>bash someone for helping an old man keep his house</em>. First, why Ed McMahon? There are hundreds of thousands of people facing problems with their homes and, rather than quietly helping average Joe's with mortgage payments, Trump goes and spends millions of dollars to help one old rich guy keep his palace -- and then calls <em>The Los Angeles Times</em> to brag about it. Oh, and he had to remind everyone that he went to Wharton.<br /><br />This act of charity, like everything Donald does, seems to be motivated by narcissism, grandiosity, and a thirst for publicity.<br /><br />I'm caving into his desire to have his name all over the place, but I'm also calling BS on this billionaire bailout.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/donald-trump-bails-ed-mcmahon-out-of-foreclosure-mess/">Donald Trump bails Ed McMahon out of foreclosure mess</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hnRDS41TT3Iy0z4ISL2-0fOVA8pQD92IGA780>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/donald-trump-bails-ed-mcmahon-out-of-foreclosure-mess/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1285553/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/donald-trump-bails-ed-mcmahon-out-of-foreclosure-mess/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Donald Trump</category><category>DonaldTrump</category><category>Ed McMahon</category><category>EdMcmahon</category><category>Foreclosure</category><category>Housing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dumb Money Move No. 10: Buy a home in foreclosure]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/dumb-money-move-10-buy-a-home-in-foreclosure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/dumb-money-move-10-buy-a-home-in-foreclosure/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/dumb-money-move-10-buy-a-home-in-foreclosure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dan_solin_5668-%28wince%29.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><em>This post is part of a series where personal finance expert <a href="http://www.smartestinvestmentbook.com/">Dan Solin</a> looks at money moves that may seem smart in tough economic times, but are actually quite dumb. <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/recession/12-things-not-to-do-now">See all 12</a></em>.<br /><br />Is there a silver lining in the horrific number of home foreclosures we read about every day?<br /><br />While having a home foreclosed must be traumatic for the homeowner, does it present an opportunity for investors and potential home buyers to pick up a bargain?<br /><br />The answer may depend on the nature of the sale.<br /><br />The classic scenario is the auction, where a home is literally auctioned off to the highest bidder, often right on the lawn in front of the house.<br /><br />The basic problem with buying a home at auction is that you have no right to inspect the home and you have to pay the full purchase price by cash or bank check on the spot. There have been situations where buyers found serious problems with homes purchased in this manner, which would have been uncovered by a competent home inspector. Also, while not common, the homeowner may refuse to vacate the house. If so, you may be confronted with delays and significant legal fees to evict him.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/dumb-money-move-10-buy-a-home-in-foreclosure/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dumb Money Move No. 10: Buy a home in foreclosure</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/dumb-money-move-10-buy-a-home-in-foreclosure/">Dumb Money Move No. 10: Buy a home in foreclosure</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/dumb-money-move-10-buy-a-home-in-foreclosure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1269677/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/09/dumb-money-move-10-buy-a-home-in-foreclosure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosuresforsale</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Solin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: Washington Mutual buried by bad-mortgage baggage]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/worst-10-year-performers-washington-mutual-buried-by-bad-mortga/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/worst-10-year-performers-washington-mutual-buried-by-bad-mortga/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/worst-10-year-performers-washington-mutual-buried-by-bad-mortga/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-washington-mutual-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In t<a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade?icid=100214839x1206443214x1200311100">his series</a>, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.</em></p>
<p>Seattle-based <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">Washington Mutual, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">WM</a>) was doing just fine on the charts, thank you, until the entire financial-services sector was upended in 2007 by the twin evils of caustic subprime loans and the ensuing credit crunch. <br /></p>
<p>While it's an honor it would probably just as soon not claim, WaMu is a prime example of an otherwise decent stock that got slammed by a macroeconomic stealth bomb.</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At No. 9 on our list of SPX stragglers, WM shed 83% of its value during the 10-year period that concluded on June 30, 2008. Prior to June 2007, the stock was trending higher along support from its 50-month moving average. Double-top resistance near $46 proved difficult to surmount, but WM was holding up respectably ... that is, until the first shock waves of the credit crunch hit in spring 2007.</p>
<p>Following news of massive subprime-related losses at hedge funds owned by Bear Stearns, Wall Street's attention was suddenly riveted to mortgage loans and the banks that carried them on their balance sheets. During WaMu's first-quarter report, chairman and CEO Kerry Killinger attempted to reassure anxious investors with the optimistic statement, "Over the past 12 months, we have taken a number of prudent actions to reduce our exposure to the subprime mortgage industry ... [which] limited our exposure to the mortgage market's downturn and position us well to expand and grow as market conditions improve."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/worst-10-year-performers-washington-mutual-buried-by-bad-mortga/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: Washington Mutual buried by bad-mortgage baggage</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/worst-10-year-performers-washington-mutual-buried-by-bad-mortga/">Worst 10-year performers: Washington Mutual buried by bad-mortgage baggage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/worst-10-year-performers-washington-mutual-buried-by-bad-mortga/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262892/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/30/worst-10-year-performers-washington-mutual-buried-by-bad-mortga/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>foreclosure</category><category>mortgage</category><category>subprime</category><category>Washington Mutual</category><category>WashingtonMutual</category><category>WM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: Bad real-estate bets punish Huntington Bancshares]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/worst-10-year-performers-bad-real-estate-bets-punish-huntington/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/worst-10-year-performers-bad-real-estate-bets-punish-huntington/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/worst-10-year-performers-bad-real-estate-bets-punish-huntington/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-huntington-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade?icid=100214839x1206443214x1200311100">this series</a>, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.</em></p>
<p>Is it just me, or were Ohio-based regional banks a particular target of the market's wrath during our focus decade? <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/keycorp-new/key/nys">KeyCorp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/keycorp-new/key/nys">KEY</a>) of Cleveland and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fifth-third-bancorp/fitb/nas">Fifth Third Bancorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fifth-third-bancorp/fitb/nas">FITB</a>) of Cincinnati have already made cameos on our list of losers -- and I'm not going to give it away, but there's at least one more Buckeye State banker further down the line-up. And, of course, how could we forget Columbus-based <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/huntington-bancshares-incorporated/hban/nas">Huntington Bancshares</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/huntington-bancshares-incorporated/hban/nas">HBAN</a>)?</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At number 14 on our list of SPX laggards, HBAN shed 77% of its value from June 30, 1998 through June 30, 2008. At the end of June 1998, the shares were perched just narrowly atop $25 -- a region that would later switch roles to provide impenetrable resistance from July 2004 through the end of 2006. Now, in the wake of a precipitous price plunge, HBAN is wallowing some 72% below this formerly critical level.</p>
<p>Unlike some other regional banks, HBAN started to feel the pain of subprime-gone-wrong as soon as July 2007. At the time, the bank warned that its second-quarter earnings would fall 11 cents short of analysts' expectations. CEO Thomas Hoaglin admitted, "These results were below our expectations and resulted primarily from difficult and deteriorating residential real estate markets." This admission paved the way for an all-out plunge; from its July 2007 peak to its July 2008 low, the stock shed 81%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/worst-10-year-performers-bad-real-estate-bets-punish-huntington/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: Bad real-estate bets punish Huntington Bancshares</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/worst-10-year-performers-bad-real-estate-bets-punish-huntington/">Worst 10-year performers: Bad real-estate bets punish Huntington Bancshares</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/worst-10-year-performers-bad-real-estate-bets-punish-huntington/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262843/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/28/worst-10-year-performers-bad-real-estate-bets-punish-huntington/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>foreclosure</category><category>HBAN</category><category>Huntington Bancshares</category><category>HuntingtonBancshares</category><category>regional bank</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$8.6 billion in foreclosed homes weigh down bank balance sheets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" /><em><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aMz0dl3IdwjU&amp;refer=news">Bloomberg News</a></em> reports that the 8,500 banks and S&amp;Ls in the U.S. hold $8.56 billion worth of foreclosed homes on their balance sheets. And most of those $6.9 billion, are held by two companies -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Fannie Mae</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FNM</font></a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Freddie Mac</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FRE</font></a>). They hold 81% of the foreclosed properties but 50% of the mortgages -- more evidence that Fannie and Freddie financed far more bad loans than their standards should have permitted.</p>
<p>This inventory of foreclosed homes weighs down the entire housing market. Generally, such homes sell for a 20% discount -- and that's not good for the prices in the neighborhood. <em>Bloomberg</em> reports that the prices received for foreclosed properties have declined -- from 93% in 2005 to 74% of the unpaid mortgage principal. Moreover, unless the bank pays to cut the grass and otherwise maintain the foreclosed home, its poor curb appeal taints the neighborhood a bit for potential buyers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$8.6 billion in foreclosed homes weigh down bank balance sheets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/">$8.6 billion in foreclosed homes weigh down bank balance sheets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aMz0dl3IdwjU&amp;refer=news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1264561/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/23/8-6-billion-in-foreclosed-homes-weigh-down-bank-balance-sheets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fannie mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>fnm</category><category>foreclosed</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosurebustour</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>foreclosuresforsale</category><category>fre</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Countrywide fined $325,000 for ripping off consumers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/countrywide-fined-325-000-for-ripping-off-consumers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/countrywide-fined-325-000-for-ripping-off-consumers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/countrywide-fined-325-000-for-ripping-off-consumers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a></p><img width="182" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="114" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/countrywide-logo-1.gif" />The Chapter 13 bankruptcy trustee in Pittsburgh accused Countrywide Financial, the poster child for lending practices that were disastrous for both investors and consumers (but worked out quite well for Angelo Mozilo), of losing or destroying more than $500,000 in checks between December 2005 and April 2007, and then charging already downtrodden borrowers for illegitimate late fees and legal costs.<br /><br />Countrywide <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/16/business/16lend.html?ref=business">recently settled</a> those allegations, and will pay $325,000. That's it. Is that a deterrent? Now that Countrywide is owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>), it's barely a rounding error, and certainly not something that will discourage Countrywide or other lenders from ripping people off.<br /><br />Crime might not pay, but apparently it doesn't cost much either. Given the continuing flow of hugely negative publicity for Countrywide, it's hard to imagine that Bank of America isn't rethinking its plan to keep the Countrywide brand. Why would someone go a company synonymous with foreclosures, bait and switch, and corporate greed when they want a home loan?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/countrywide-fined-325-000-for-ripping-off-consumers/">Countrywide fined $325,000 for ripping off consumers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/16/business/16lend.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/countrywide-fined-325-000-for-ripping-off-consumers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1257267/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/16/countrywide-fined-325-000-for-ripping-off-consumers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>CFC</category><category>Countrywide Financial</category><category>CountrywideFinancial</category><category>Foreclosure</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mortages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
