<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Apple Still Fortune's Most Respected Company]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/apple-still-fortunes-most-repected-company/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/apple-still-fortunes-most-repected-company/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/apple-still-fortunes-most-repected-company/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Apple (AAPL)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/macworldcrop.jpg" /><em>Fortune</em> has released its list of the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/mostadmired/2011/snapshots/670.html">world's 50 most respected companies</a> and once again Apple Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) tops the list.</p>
<p>This is the fourth year in a row that the Cupertino based company has grabbed the top slot. Apple's respect comes mainly due to the company's ability to release new products at an amazingly quick pace, often updating its main product lines at least once a year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/apple-still-fortunes-most-repected-company/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple Still Fortune's Most Respected Company</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/apple-still-fortunes-most-repected-company/">Apple Still Fortune's Most Respected Company</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/apple-still-fortunes-most-repected-company/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19867229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/apple-still-fortunes-most-repected-company/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>brk.b</category><category>featured</category><category>fortune</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ipad 2</category><category>luv</category><category>pg</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>southwest airlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time and WSJ to lay off more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/wall_street_journal_240.jpg" alt="" />The mayhem in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/media/">media</a> industry continues. The <a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>, a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">News Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) property, is <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/the_revolving_door/more_business_journalism_layoffs_wall_street_journal_closes_boston_office_141650.asp" target="_blank">closing its Boston bureau and sending nine employees into the wind</a>. The newswire and <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com" target="_blank">MarketWatch</a> operations are going to stay open in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Boston/">Boston</a>, however, with no headcount impact. </p>
<p>The Journal doesn't have any plans to close other offices, according to a memo by managing editor Robert Thomson: "there are no plans, nascent or otherwise, to close any other U.S. or international bureau." The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WSJ/">WSJ</a> will still support an "investigative function" in Boston, but the New York-based Money and Investing team will cover Boston's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> industry, which boasts such heavy hitters as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Fidelity/">Fidelity</a>. </p>
<p>At the same time, magazine company <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/TimeInc/">Time Inc</a>., owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) is looking to cut $100 million in expenses, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> will undoubtedly figure into the equation. The company that owns <a href="http://www.time.com" target="_blank">Time</a>, <a href="http://www.fortune.com" target="_blank">Fortune</a>, <a href="http://www.people.com" target="_blank">People</a> and <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/" target="_blank">Sports Illustrated</a> - and falls under the same umbrella as <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a>, which owns <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com" target="_blank">BloggingStocks</a> - is feeling the squeeze of a media recession that's even worse than the regular recession we've all been battling for what feels like decades. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time and WSJ to lay off more</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/">Time and WSJ to lay off more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>boston.com</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>conde nast</category><category>CondeNast</category><category>cost cutting</category><category>CostCutting</category><category>fortune</category><category>graydon carter</category><category>GraydonCarter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><category>magazine</category><category>magazines</category><category>marketwatch</category><category>mckinsey</category><category>mckinseyco.</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>new york</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corpb nws</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NewsCorporation</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>PeopleMagazine</category><category>SportsIllustrated</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>VanityFair</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fortune Brands sees golf sales slump]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/fortune-brands-sees-golf-sales-slump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/fortune-brands-sees-golf-sales-slump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/fortune-brands-sees-golf-sales-slump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fo/" rel="tag">Fortune Brands (FO)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-14-michelle-wie-200cm121808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Let's play a game of <em>Do You Know</em>? Do You Know that the same company that produces Jim Beam, DeKuyper, and Canadian Club also produces Moen Faucets and Master Lock? <em>Do You Know</em> that the aforementioned company also houses an expansive golf department, boasting Titleist, FootJoy, Cobra, Pinnacle, and Scotty Cameron? All of these products can be found under one company's roof: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fortune-brands-inc/fo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Fortune Brands, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fortune-brands-inc/fo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">FO</a>). <br /><br />You may not think that spirits, faucets, and golf have much to do with each other - but if you ever saw me play, you would understand my golf ball's affinity for water and the need to drink heavily to make it seem like I have any business on the course.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/fortune-brands-sees-golf-sales-slump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fortune Brands sees golf sales slump</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/fortune-brands-sees-golf-sales-slump/">Fortune Brands sees golf sales slump</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/fortune-brands-sees-golf-sales-slump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1444764/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/fortune-brands-sees-golf-sales-slump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Acushnet Company</category><category>AcushnetCompany</category><category>bruce carbonari</category><category>BruceCarbonari</category><category>FO</category><category>fortune</category><category>golf</category><category>titleist</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[General Electric: A buy for yield]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/29/general-electric-a-buy-for-yield/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/29/general-electric-a-buy-for-yield/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/29/general-electric-a-buy-for-yield/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) may be one of the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0802/gallery.mostadmired_top20.fortune/3.html">most admired companies in the world</a>, at least according to <em>Fortune.</em> But, Wall Street hates the company and has driven its stock to multi-year lows. The concerns have been printed dozens of times in the press: GE is too large. It has too many units that do not do well. None of the firm's divisions fit well together.</p>
<p>But, GE now has an attraction all its own. It pays a yield of nearly 5%. The company is still tremendously profitable and has $15 billion in cash.</p>
<p>If the U.S. stock market continues to drop, the successful investing tactics of the last several years, which involve putting money into is stocks because equities in general are rising quickly, may not be a good way to make money this year or next. </p>
<p>There are a handful of companies with iron-clad balance sheets and big dividends. The stocks of these may not go up, but their dividends are likely to stay intact. GE is at the head of this list.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/29/general-electric-a-buy-for-yield/">General Electric: A buy for yield</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/29/general-electric-a-buy-for-yield/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1239978/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/29/general-electric-a-buy-for-yield/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividends</category><category>Fortune</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[When will Lehman take $4 billion in CDO write-downs?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/when-will-lehman-take-4-billion-in-cdo-write-downs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/when-will-lehman-take-4-billion-in-cdo-write-downs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/when-will-lehman-take-4-billion-in-cdo-write-downs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/leh-lehman-brothers-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/04/news/companies/boyd_lehman.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008060414">Fortune</a></em> -- which shares parent <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) with BloggingStocks -- provides a clue about how big of a write-down <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">Lehman Brothers Holdings</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">LEH</a>) needs to take in order to account accurately for its Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) portfolio. By my estimate, that write-down could total roughly $4 billion -- wiping out 20% of Lehman's $20 billion in capital.</p>
<p>How so? I calculated $4.07 billion worth of write-downs -- $1.63 billion of the write-off is from worthless BB and below rated CDOs and another $2.44 billion is from the remaining CDOs that are worth about half their stated value. This is based on <em>Fortune's</em> report that Lehman has $6.5 billion worth of CDOs. The 25% that are rated BB or below it believes are worthless. The remaining 75% it figures are worth 50 cents on the dollar.</p>
<p>But wait, there's more. Lehman has $39 billion worth of Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities (CMBSs) which have lost value. A key index has declined in the last quarter -- but I don't know how much. Assuming the decline was 25%, Lehman would need to write down an additional $9.8 billion. If Lehman needed to take the $9.8 billion write-down plus the $4 billion for the CDOs, its capital would decline 75%.</p>
<p>When I think about how Lehman is not the only one to hold these dodgy securities, it becomes clear that our financial system is resting on a very shaky foundation. </p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/when-will-lehman-take-4-billion-in-cdo-write-downs/">When will Lehman take $4 billion in CDO write-downs?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/04/news/companies/boyd_lehman.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008060414>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/when-will-lehman-take-4-billion-in-cdo-write-downs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1216348/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/when-will-lehman-take-4-billion-in-cdo-write-downs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cdo</category><category>cdos</category><category>cmbs</category><category>featured</category><category>fortune</category><category>fortune magazine</category><category>FortuneMagazine</category><category>leh</category><category>lehman</category><category>lehman bros.</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBros.</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fortune strikes out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><em>Fortune</em>, which shares a parent, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Time Warner Inc.</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"><font color="#0072bc">TWX</font></a>), with <em>BloggingStocks</em>, struck out this week. What I mean is that it published three articles -- each of which I think completely missed the boat. I really like when <em>Fortune </em>gets an in-depth interview with interesting business leaders. But sometimes, it goes too far praising its subjects.</p>
<p>That may have been what happened in the three stories where I think <em>Fortune</em> whiffed:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Providence Equity Partners.</strong> <em>Fortune</em> had a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/13/magazines/fortune/mehta_biggest_deal_ever.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008051908">cover story</a> praising Providence Equity Partners for closing the biggest private equity deal ever. Unfortunately, as I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/is-the-bell-tolling-for-providence-equity-partners-51-billion/">posted</a>, that $52 billion deal fell apart this week. To be fair, <em>Fortune</em> updated its online version of the article with this information. <strong>Strike One</strong>. </li>
    <li><strong>Bernanke saves the day</strong>. <em>Fortune</em> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/22/news/newsmakers/fed.mixed.blessing.fortune/index.htm">posted an article</a> praising Bernanke for stopping the slide in the stock market with his fast interest rate cuts and emergency lending. This week that illusion was burst as the Dow lost 507 points. <strong>Strike Two</strong>. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fortune strikes out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/">Fortune strikes out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 May 2008 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1204720/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andy serwer</category><category>AndySerwer</category><category>ben bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>c. k. prahalad</category><category>C.K.Prahalad</category><category>eric von hippel</category><category>EricVonHippel</category><category>fortune</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mit</category><category>provide</category><category>providence equity pa...</category><category>ProvidenceEquityPa...</category><category>providenceequitypart...</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst commentary lifts Nokia (NOK)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/analyst-commentary-lifts-nokia-nok/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/analyst-commentary-lifts-nokia-nok/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/analyst-commentary-lifts-nokia-nok/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.nokia.com/investors" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/nok-nokia-logo.jpg" alt="NOK logo" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">Nokia Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">NOK</a>) shares are trading higher after analysts at <span style="font-style: italic;">Fortune</span> wrote in that <a href="http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/04/16/nokia-set-to-shine/?section=money_topstories" target="_blank">NOK's global reach and the strength of the international wireless market should help the company meet earnings targets</a> when it reports on Thursday. NOK is also receiving support from an optimistic second-quarter forecast from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>), which has bolstered the tech sector this morning. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on NOK.
<p>After hitting a one-year low of $23.61 last April, the stock hit a one-year high of $42.22 in November. NOK opened this morning at $33.19. So far today the stock has hit a low of $32.90 and a high of $33.62. As of 12:15, NOK is trading at $33.50, up $1.40 (4.4%). The chart for NOK looks bearish and steady, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.</p>
<p>For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a May <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $28 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 7.1% return in just one month as long as NOK is above $28 at May expiration. Nokia would have to fall by more than 16% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/analyst-commentary-lifts-nokia-nok/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Analyst commentary lifts Nokia (NOK)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/analyst-commentary-lifts-nokia-nok/">Analyst commentary lifts Nokia (NOK)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/analyst-commentary-lifts-nokia-nok/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1169393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/analyst-commentary-lifts-nokia-nok/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fortune</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>NOK</category><category>Nokia</category><category>options</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Did Steve Jobs push the Apple board to break the law?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/did-steve-jobs-bully-the-apple-board-into-breaking-the-law/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/did-steve-jobs-bully-the-apple-board-into-breaking-the-law/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/did-steve-jobs-bully-the-apple-board-into-breaking-the-law/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><em><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/02/news/companies/elkind_jobs.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008030419">Fortune</a></em> (which shares parent <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) with BloggingStocks) provides at least two examples which raise questions about whether <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AAPL</a>) CEO Steve Jobs pushed the Apple board into violating the law. </p>
<p>Two revelations in the article -- that Apple's board decided not to disclose Jobs's pancreatic cancer, for which he delayed surgery because he wanted to try a diet cure, and that Jobs set a backdated options date of January 16, 2001 which the board rubber-stamped, giving recipients a profit of either $1.6 million or $3.9 million -- make me wonder whether Jobs convinced Apple's board to break the law. </p>
<p>As I <a href="http://aapl.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/is-lazard-ceo-bruce-wasserstein-really-fine/">posted in 2006</a>, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lazard-ltd/laz/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lazard, Ltd.'s</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lazard-ltd/laz/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LAZ</a>) board may have failed to disclose the illness of its CEO, Bruce Wasserstein, when reports surfaced that he was out of the office with a heart ailment. A lawyer I spoke with said that if a CEO is unable to do his or her job due to illness, the board must disclose it. If Jobs's pancreatic cancer surgery kept him away from doing the CEO's job, how did Apple's lawyers defend the failure to disclose? It surely couldn't have been the lack of materiality -- some estimated that if his illness had been disclosed, Apple stock would have lost 20% of its value.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/did-steve-jobs-bully-the-apple-board-into-breaking-the-law/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Did Steve Jobs push the Apple board to break the law?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/did-steve-jobs-bully-the-apple-board-into-breaking-the-law/">Did Steve Jobs push the Apple board to break the law?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/did-steve-jobs-bully-the-apple-board-into-breaking-the-law/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1131928/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/05/did-steve-jobs-bully-the-apple-board-into-breaking-the-law/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Bruce Wasserstein</category><category>BruceWasserstein</category><category>Fortune</category><category>LAZ</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does the Dow have another 2,668 points to fall?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/does-the-dow-have-another-2-668-points-to-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/does-the-dow-have-another-2-668-points-to-fall/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/does-the-dow-have-another-2-668-points-to-fall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/nysepicture.jpg" alt="stocks" />If you believe an analysis I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/why-the-market-will-drop-another-18-and-how-google-will-feel-th/">posted</a> of a <em>Fortune</em> article last November,  the answer is probably yes. This is based on a theory that stock prices needed to adjust downward for something called the <strong>equity risk premium</strong>.</p>
<p>How did <em>Fortune</em> arrive at the idea that the market needs an 18% drop? (I should note that  <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) owns both BloggingStocks and <span style="font-style: italic;">Fortune</span>.) <span style="font-style: italic;">Fortune</span> calculates the current <strong>equity risk premium</strong> by adding stocks' <strong>earnings yield</strong> -- which it gets by flipping the market's P/E on its head (calculating E/P) -- to the <strong>inflation rate</strong> and then <em>subtracts </em>the <strong>t-bill yield</strong>. Then it compares the current value with the <strong>long run</strong> equity risk premium to conclude that stocks have a long way to fall before their prices align with that long-run value.</p>
<p>Here are the numbers. The market currently trades at a PE of 16, but based on adjustments to remove short term spikes by Yale market guru Robert Schiller, <em>Fortune</em> uses a PE of 22 -- which is the inverse of the market's earnings yield of 4.5%. Investors expect equity returns of 7% -- calculated by adding expected inflation of 2.5% to that 4.5%. To get the <strong>equity risk premium of 3%</strong> <em>Fortune</em> subtracted the 10-year treasury rate of 4% from that 7% expected return. Got that?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/does-the-dow-have-another-2-668-points-to-fall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does the Dow have another 2,668 points to fall?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/does-the-dow-have-another-2-668-points-to-fall/">Does the Dow have another 2,668 points to fall?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/us-stocks-open-lower-in-rocky-trading/n20080123101509990035>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/does-the-dow-have-another-2-668-points-to-fall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1094224/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/does-the-dow-have-another-2-668-points-to-fall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>featured</category><category>Fortune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask Vanguard founder John Bogle a question!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/ask-vanguard-founder-john-bogle-a-question/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/ask-vanguard-founder-john-bogle-a-question/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/ask-vanguard-founder-john-bogle-a-question/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/question.jpg"  alt="" />So it isn't every day that you get to ask an investment legend a question -- I would argue that Vanguard founder John Bogle has done more to help the small investor than everyone else in the history of the world combined times 10.<br /><br />It really isn't even close. Index funds have enabled people saving for retirement to compound their money at a far, far better rate than they could before. Bogle's creation has allowed investors saving for retirement to let their money grow uninhibited, and cut off a stream of billions of dollars in undeserved management fees to poorly-performing mutual fund managers.<br /><br />Tirade over. <em>Fortune</em> is giving readers an opportunity to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/questionsfor/index.html">submit a question</a> to Mr. Bogle. A few hints: Don't ask him where the stock market is going. A cornerstone of his philosophy is his belief that it's nearly impossible to predict. Instead, ask him questions about public policy and corporate governance. Oh, and read his amazing and underrated book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Battle-Soul-Capitalism-John-Bogle/dp/0300119712/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1196050802&amp;sr=8-1">The Battle For the Soul of Capitalism</a>.<br /><br />I would ask him what he thinks about Social Security and whether it has a future in its current form. I would also want to know what he thinks about the huge improvements in corporate governance that have been achieved by activist hedge fund managers -- and whether enterprising investors might be able to find alpha by piggybacking off their picks.<br /><br />There are literally hundreds of questions I could ask this legend -- I'm sure you have a few yourself.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/ask-vanguard-founder-john-bogle-a-question/">Ask Vanguard founder John Bogle a question!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/questionsfor/index.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/ask-vanguard-founder-john-bogle-a-question/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1047629/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/ask-vanguard-founder-john-bogle-a-question/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fortune</category><category>John Bogle</category><category>JohnBogle</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Did Google get Fortune to pull Larry Page's wedding announcement?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/did-google-get-fortune-to-pull-larry-pages-wedding-announcement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/did-google-get-fortune-to-pull-larry-pages-wedding-announcement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/did-google-get-fortune-to-pull-larry-pages-wedding-announcement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/rumormonger/fortune-editor-censors-larry-and-lucys-wedding-date-317085.php">Valleywag</a> reports that <em>Fortune</em>'s editor, Andrew Serwer, posted a blog entry October 19 about the wedding of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) co-founder Larry Page to his girlfriend Lucy Southworth. (<em>Fortune</em> and BloggingStocks share the same corporate parent, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>)).</p>
<p>But when Valleywag wanted to write about the post, it had disappeared from <em>Fortune</em>'s website. When Valleywag went to Google's cache, the reference to the Page/Southworth wedding was gone. Fortunately for those interested in the details of the post, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) had a copy of the original.</p>
<p>By the way, the Serwer post said that Page and Southworth were getting married on December 7, and those attending the blessed event will need passports, which suggests it will be outside the U.S. <em><a href="http://valleywag.com/tech/rumormonger/larry-and-lucy-to-wed-on-necker-island-317321.php">Valleywag</a></em> now suggests that the wedding could be held on Richard Branson's Necker Island. But one question remains unanswered: if you know why <em>Fortune</em> and Google removed this post from their sites, please comment below.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/did-google-get-fortune-to-pull-larry-pages-wedding-announcement/">Did Google get Fortune to pull Larry Page's wedding announcement?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/did-google-get-fortune-to-pull-larry-pages-wedding-announcement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1026229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/did-google-get-fortune-to-pull-larry-pages-wedding-announcement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fortune</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>Lucy Southworth</category><category>LucySouthworth</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>weddings</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner (TWX) unit is pondering the future of ... Time Warner]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p>After looking through some web postings internally, there was a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/09/17/news/companies/twx_bewkes.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007091709">very interesting article</a> regarding <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=TWX&amp;source=story_quote_link">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=TWX&amp;source=story_quote_link">TWX</a>) that can be indirectly inferred to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">Time Warner Cable Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">TWC</a>) and all units of the media conglomerate. The article "For Time Warner, a time to break up?" is available on the CNNMoney.com website, but is really a <em>FORTUNE Magazine </em>article. <em>FORTUNE </em>and CNN are both properties of Time Warner Inc. <br /><br />The article is basically predicting that Jeff Bewkes will soon replace Dick Parsons as the Chairman &amp; CEO of the parent company. It also points to a recent anvil weighing on the transition -- the sagging stock price of Time Warner. The truth is that the first real wave of the transition took hold in 2006 when the company separated Time Warner Cable and used financial leverage to buy back billions of dollars worth of stock. That buyback did continue, but 2006 was the year the buyback was felt the most as the stock rose nearly 50% from its lows.<br /><br />While the article does not call for major changes, it notes how Time Warner produces more cash flow than its rivals, although <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=NWS&amp;source=story_quote_link">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=NWS&amp;source=story_quote_link">NWS</a>) and <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=DIS&amp;source=story_quote_link">Walt Disney Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=DIS&amp;source=story_quote_link">DIS</a>) have outperformed as stocks. The article goes on to mention that Bewkes has noted that other media break-ups may not be yielding much upside, and that he agrees with Parsons for now that the combined entity is worth more than the pieces as unaffiliated entities.<br /><br />Regardless of the many twists and turns in the article, this seemed odd coming out of <em>FORTUNE</em>. I laid out my own <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/whats-next-for-aol-at-time-warner/">scenario where the company could float a portion of AOL</a> as a tracking stock, a scenario that still seems quite likely. Rather than an entire spin-out of the cable assets, it seems to me that the media giant should at least maintain a large stake (if not an outright 50% plus 1 vote majority) in the cable company, and that any analyst calls to the contrary are misplaced. It is easy to call for break-ups in a bull market to unlock more value, but there are many more defensive and stabilizing strategies for a giant to weather harder times. <br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/">Time Warner (TWX) unit is pondering the future of ... Time Warner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/09/17/news/companies/twx_bewkes.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007091709>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/991308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/time-warner-twx-unit-is-pondering-the-future-of-time-warne/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>cnn</category><category>dis</category><category>fortune</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>twx</category><category>walt disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fortune writer calls Google a 'pipe dream']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/fortune-writer-calls-google-a-pipe-dream/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/fortune-writer-calls-google-a-pipe-dream/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/fortune-writer-calls-google-a-pipe-dream/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) disappointing third quarter brought the bears out of the woodwork. In a recent column, Fortune Magazine's Geoff Colvin <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/08/06/100141308/index.htm?postversion=2007072403">makes the case</a> that Google is overvalued. <br /></p>
<p><br />Sure, it's a great company with terrific management and it has generated tremendous value for shareholders. Colvin essentially argues that Google has been earning extraordinary returns on capital and that, just to maintain its current price level, it will need to earn even better returns in the future. As Charlie Munger has said, few businesses have a future as good as their past.</p>
<p>Anyone who owns shares of Google or is considering buying should read Colvin's insightful article. Given the extraordinary returns, thousands of brilliant young minds are working around the clock hoping to dethrone Google's leadership position.</p>
<p>I would be careful with this stock.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/fortune-writer-calls-google-a-pipe-dream/">Fortune writer calls Google a 'pipe dream'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/08/06/100141308/index.htm?postversion=2007072403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/fortune-writer-calls-google-a-pipe-dream/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/953041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/fortune-writer-calls-google-a-pipe-dream/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fortune</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up 6-19-07: AT&amp;T not considering buying Vodafone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/newspaper-wrap-up-6-19-07-atandt-not-considering-buying-vodafone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/newspaper-wrap-up-6-19-07-atandt-not-considering-buying-vodafone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/newspaper-wrap-up-6-19-07-atandt-not-considering-buying-vodafone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">Delta Airlines Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">DAL</a>), sprinting to the start as it emerges from bankruptcy, is expected to order about 125 <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) 787 jetliners by the end of 2007, reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118221513862839877.html?mod=home_whats_news_us "><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required).<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118221513862839877.html?mod=home_whats_news_us "><em><br /></em></a></li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hsbc-holdings-p-l-c/hbc/nys">HSBC Holdings</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hsbc-holdings-p-l-c/hbc/nys">HBC</a>) is preparing to push its banking operations into China as part of a move to tap into the emerging wealthy consumer base in Asia, reported the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2dcf3272-1db8-11dc-89f7-000b5df10621.html "><em>Financial Times</em></a> (subscription required).</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2e6dea48-1dd6-11dc-89f7-000b5df10621.html "><em>Financial Times</em></a> also reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">AT&amp;T</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) is not considering making an offer to buy British mobile telecom company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vodafone-group-plc-new/vod/nys">Vodafone Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vodafone-group-plc-new/vod/nys">VOD</a>), said AT&amp;T's new CEO, Randall Stephenson, contrary to previous speculation.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/18/news/companies/pluggedin_arango_dj.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2007061814 "><em>Fortune</em></a> reported that Billionaire supermarket mogul Ron Burkle may announce a long-shot bid this week for business news and information company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">Dow Jones and Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">DJ</a>), according to a source.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/News_By_Industry/Telecom/RCOM_in_talks_with_Accenture_to_float_JV/articleshow/2132891.cms "><em>Economic Times</em></a> reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/accenture-ltd-bermuda/acn/nys">Accenture Ltd</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/accenture-ltd-bermuda/acn/nys">ACN</a>) is in joint venture talks with Indian telecom operator Reliance Communications, which could have an exit clause giving Reliance the opportunity to buy Accenture in the future.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/newspaper-wrap-up-6-19-07-atandt-not-considering-buying-vodafone/">Newspaper wrap-up 6-19-07: AT&amp;T not considering buying Vodafone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/newspaper-wrap-up-6-19-07-atandt-not-considering-buying-vodafone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/newspaper-wrap-up-6-19-07-atandt-not-considering-buying-vodafone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>787</category><category>ba</category><category>boeing</category><category>china</category><category>dal</category><category>delta</category><category>economic times</category><category>EconomicTimes</category><category>financial times</category><category>FinancialTimes</category><category>fortune</category><category>ft</category><category>hbc</category><category>hsbc</category><category>newspaper</category><category>paper</category><category>periodical</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst initiations 6-13-07: BDK, DKS, FO and NOK]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/analyst-initiations-6-13-07-bdk-dks-fo-and-nok/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/analyst-initiations-6-13-07-bdk-dks-fo-and-nok/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/analyst-initiations-6-13-07-bdk-dks-fo-and-nok/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bdk/" rel="tag">Black and Decker (BDK)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>This morning's noteworthy initiations included Nokia Corp (NOK), Fortune Brands, Inc (FO), Whirlpool Corp (WHR), Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc (DKS), Kona Grill, Inc (KONA): <br />
<ul>
    <li>JP Morgan started <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">Nokia Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">NOK</a>) with an Overweight rating, believing the handset market is strong and expects gross profits to rise in 2007. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Soleil wants to wait on the sidelines of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fortune-brands-inc/fo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Fortune Brands Inc </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fortune-brands-inc/fo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">FO</a>), initiating shares with a Neutral rating, given the potential acquisition of Sweden's V&amp;S Group along with the softness in the home and hardware segment. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Soleil also started <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Whirlpool Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WHR</a>) with a Hold rating based on valuation, which they believe reflects the company's outlook through 2009. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Nollenberger expects <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dick-s-sporting-goods-inc/dks/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Dick's Sporting Goods </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dick-s-sporting-goods-inc/dks/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DKS</a>) will continue to outperform its peers, starting shares off with a Buy rating, and believes the recent pullback provides a compelling buying opportunity. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>KeyBanc is positive on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kona-grill-inc/kona/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Kona Grill's </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kona-grill-inc/kona/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">KONA</a>) differentiated brand, compelling unit economics, positive SSS opportunity and growth, starting shares with a Buy rating... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER INITIATIONS: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ceva-inc/ceva/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Ceva, Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ceva-inc/ceva/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CEVA</a>) was initiated at CIBC with a Sector Outperform rating. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-black-and-decker-corporation/bdk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Black &amp; Decker Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-black-and-decker-corporation/bdk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BDK</a>) and Briggs &amp; Stratton Corp (BGG) were initiated with Hold ratings at Soleil. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/la-jolla-pharmaceutical-company/ljpc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">La Jolla Pharmaceutical Co </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/la-jolla-pharmaceutical-company/ljpc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">LJPC</a>) was started with a Sell rating at Lazard. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aviza-technology-inc/avza/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Aviza Technology, Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aviza-technology-inc/avza/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AVZA</a>) was initiated with a Hold rating at Needham.</li>
</ul>
Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/analyst-initiations-6-13-07-bdk-dks-fo-and-nok/">Analyst initiations 6-13-07: BDK, DKS, FO and NOK</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/analyst-initiations-6-13-07-bdk-dks-fo-and-nok/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/917202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/analyst-initiations-6-13-07-bdk-dks-fo-and-nok/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>aviza</category><category>avza</category><category>bdk</category><category>black</category><category>ceva</category><category>dick</category><category>dick's</category><category>dks</category><category>fo</category><category>fortune</category><category>kona</category><category>la jolla</category><category>LaJolla</category><category>ljpc</category><category>nok</category><category>nokia</category><category>rating</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>upgrade</category><category>whirlpool</category><category>whr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Michael Steinhardt on investing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/michael-steinhardt-on-investing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/michael-steinhardt-on-investing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/michael-steinhardt-on-investing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>The latest issue of <em>Fortune Magazine</em> (article not available online) featured an interview with investing legend <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Steinhardt">Michael Steinhardt</a>. Formely a hedge fund manager with his firm Steinhardt Partnes, he is now retired from investing, and devotes his time to philanthropic endeavors, including Birthright, a program which sends American Jewish youth to Israel for several weeks. His Book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/No-Bull-Life-Out-Markets/dp/0471660469/sr=1-1/qid=1170083752/ref=sr_1_1/102-4258049-5076131?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books"><em>No Bull: My Life In and Out of Markets</em> </a>is an interesting read. Here are some of the major points from the <em>Fortune </em>interview:</p>
<p>-Regarding the direction of the market, Steinhardt said he is not comfortable with it and, based on intuition, he is "short a few S&amp;P 500 futures."</p>
<p>-He believes that the hedge fund boom may continue, but questions the number of large hedge funds that survive in spit of mediocre returns. "I would make the case that some long-only, low-cost mutual fund managers should, even in bad markets, achieve better returns than most of the hedge funds," he said.<br /></p>
<p>While Steinhardt is no longer as involved in markets as he once was, his caution in the face of optimism from most of the financial media is something investors may want to pay attention to. Throughout his career, Michael Steinhardt has been right more often than not.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/michael-steinhardt-on-investing/">Michael Steinhardt on investing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/michael-steinhardt-on-investing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/744360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/29/michael-steinhardt-on-investing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fortune</category><category>Michael Steinhardt</category><category>MichaelSteinhardt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Your first $10,000: Getting Started]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/your-first-10-000-getting-started/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/your-first-10-000-getting-started/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/your-first-10-000-getting-started/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="239" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/money-stock.jpg" />This story is more about saving than investing. <em><strong>If your net worth is less than $10,000, you need to save, save and save some more!</strong></em> Future articles will address larger sums.</p>
<p>I have been asked many times in person and in the comments section about how to get started as an investor. Since it is essential to have something to invest besides your time, two things above all are required: Educate yourself, and be thrifty in your spending habits.</p>
<p>Most people reading the <a href="http://money.aol.com/">AOL Money &amp; Finance section</a> probably have ten grand to invest. If you do not currently have $10,000 to invest you are in trouble and there is no time to waste. </p>
<p>First: Reduce spending on extras, even extras you think you need to live. <br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/your-first-10-000-getting-started/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Your first $10,000: Getting Started</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/your-first-10-000-getting-started/">Your first $10,000: Getting Started</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://motleyfool.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://thestreet.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://marketwatch.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/your-first-10-000-getting-started/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/705510/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/your-first-10-000-getting-started/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol.com</category><category>budgeting</category><category>Forbes</category><category>Fortune</category><category>google.com</category><category>marketwatch.com</category><category>Money Magazine</category><category>MoneyMagazine</category><category>msn.com</category><category>Mutual Funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>Roth IRA</category><category>RothIra</category><category>Saving</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Smart Money</category><category>SmartMoney</category><category>thestreet.com</category><category>yahoo.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch to repay $50,000/month rent to News Corp.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/rupert-murdoch-to-repay-50-000-month-rent-to-news-corp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/rupert-murdoch-to-repay-50-000-month-rent-to-news-corp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/rupert-murdoch-to-repay-50-000-month-rent-to-news-corp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img id="vimage_3" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/rupert_murdoch1.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Ever wish you could charge your rent to your employer? That would make for a nice day for many of us come "the rent is due" time. This is apparently what News Corp. (NYSE: NWS, NWS.A) chairman, Rupert Murdoch, does with his New York $50,000/month apartment on Fifth Avenue. The rather bodacious chairman, though, is going to <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/murdoch-to-repay-news-corp-for-50000/20061030121209990015">pay the rent back to News Corp</a>.<br /><br />While his other posh flat was being renovated, the media mogul was living in a Park Avenue apartment owned by Trump Properties with his wife, apparently needing thousands and thousands of square feet to live in. Nothing new here -- standard behavior for CEOs with golden pay packages. Still, that generally does not include <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/murdoch-to-repay-news-corp-for-50000/20061030121209990015">charging the rent to the books of your employer</a>.<br /><br />As a News Cop. shareholder, would you be enraged to find that expenses like these were being directly charged to the books of a company where you had an ownership stake? It should. Corporate governance takes yet another beating in what continues to be company leaders squandering loads of cash and equivalents without notifying shareholders in the process. Sigh.<br /><br />Murdoch's decision did not sit well with corporate-governance watchdogs, and <em>Fortune</em> magazine has learned that Murdoch has quietly decided to pay back the money. Aw shucks, how nice of him.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/rupert-murdoch-to-repay-50-000-month-rent-to-news-corp/">Rupert Murdoch to repay $50,000/month rent to News Corp.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/murdoch-to-repay-news-corp-for-50000/20061030121209990015>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/rupert-murdoch-to-repay-50-000-month-rent-to-news-corp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/693237/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/rupert-murdoch-to-repay-50-000-month-rent-to-news-corp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>chairman</category><category>corporate governance</category><category>CorporateGovernance</category><category>fortune</category><category>News. Corp.</category><category>News.Corp.</category><category>nws</category><category>nws.a</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Building eBay 2.0: Whitman and Donahoe on eBay's future]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/building-ebay-2-0-whitman-and-donahoe-on-ebays-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/building-ebay-2-0-whitman-and-donahoe-on-ebays-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/building-ebay-2-0-whitman-and-donahoe-on-ebays-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p>Back in August, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/02/looking-differently-at-ebay-and-yahoo/">suggested</a> that we should perhaps start looking at eBay differently. It is a mature company, I argued, and hence would probably require different valuation methods, lower multiples, etc. At the same time, I noted, the market has a tendency to get there naturally.</p>
<p>Today, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/10/16/8388658/index.htm?postversion=2006100406"><em>Fortune</em></a> ran a fascinating article about eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY), the issues it is facing and its management team. The article naturally focuses on eBay's CEO, Meg Whitman, and on eBay's new president of its marketplaces business, John Donahoe, believed to be Whitman's successor.</p>
<p>eBay's share price has been halved from its December 2004 high of $59, as investors are concerned mostly with the slowing growth rates. While growth rates have been most concerning in eBay's core auction business, the Skype acquisition is also a focus, especially as the promised synergies haven't materialized yet. There is also the fierce competition in Asia, and let's not forget, several key people leaving.</p>
<p>Many note, quite accurately too, that eBay is a highly profitable company with enviable operating margins and still high growth. But most, even eBay's management, realize that the company is changing as it is entering the "grownup" realm of large and mature corporations, where size and age could potentially drag it down. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/building-ebay-2-0-whitman-and-donahoe-on-ebays-future/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Building eBay 2.0: Whitman and Donahoe on eBay's future</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/building-ebay-2-0-whitman-and-donahoe-on-ebays-future/">Building eBay 2.0: Whitman and Donahoe on eBay's future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/10/16/8388658/index.htm?postversion=2006100406>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/building-ebay-2-0-whitman-and-donahoe-on-ebays-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/679352/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/building-ebay-2-0-whitman-and-donahoe-on-ebays-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>donahoe</category><category>ebay</category><category>ebay ceo</category><category>EbayCeo</category><category>fortune</category><category>meg whitman</category><category>MegWhitman</category><category>paypal</category><category>skype</category><category>succession</category><category>whitman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bravo Buffett! He's giving away $37 billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/26/bravo-buffett/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/26/bravo-buffett/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/26/bravo-buffett/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>The amazing relationship between the No. 1 and&nbsp;No. 2&nbsp;wealthiest men in the world has led Warren Buffett to change his mind.</p>
<p>For years, he resisted giving away his vast fortune until his death. But today he announced that <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060625142009990006">he would start giving it away now</a>.&nbsp;Here's how:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>The Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation will receive&nbsp;10 million Berkshire Hathaway B shares;</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>
    <div>The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, named after his late wife, will get a million B shares; and</div>
    </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>
    <div>Each of his three children's foundations will received 350,000 B shares.</div>
    </div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/26/bravo-buffett/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bravo Buffett! He's giving away $37 billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/26/bravo-buffett/">Bravo Buffett! He's giving away $37 billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jun 2006 07:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060625161409990005&amp;ncid=NWS00010000000001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://foundation>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/26/bravo-buffett/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/636715/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/26/bravo-buffett/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$37 billion</category><category>$37Billion</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>fortune</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 07:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
