<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Samsung pulls the big guns on Nokia, Motorola, Sony and LG]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/samsung-pulls-the-big-guns-on-nokia-motorola-sony-and-lg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/samsung-pulls-the-big-guns-on-nokia-motorola-sony-and-lg/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/samsung-pulls-the-big-guns-on-nokia-motorola-sony-and-lg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mot/" rel="tag">Motorola (MOT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/samsung-soul-01-at-240.jpg" alt="U900" />Samsung is trying to make more big noise in the mobile phone market. I don't think there's really any need for additional concern about this from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">Nokia Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">NOK</a>). I also don't think they'll be quaking in their boots over at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">Motorola Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">MOT</a>). Life will probably continue to be good for LG. However, Samsung really wants to move some phones in the UK and to do that, it's calling out the big guns like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>). I don't think there's danger in store for the iPhone, but I'm sure they're talking about this situation over at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>).<br /><br />In conjunction with a smattering of mobile service providers, Samsung is bundling it's new <a href="http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_u900_soul-2243.php">Soul U900 cell phones</a> with some of today's hottest electronic equipment. For instance, if UK consumers purchase a Samsung Soul U900, and contract with T-Mobile for 18 months in it's Flext 35 service plan, those consumers will receive a <a href="http://www.phoneslimited.co.uk/Samsung/U900+Soul/Free+Nintendo+Wii.html">FREE Wii system plus Wii Sports!</a> Likewise, If UK consumers buy the phone and contract with Orange Panther 75, they can receive a <a href="http://www.phoneslimited.co.uk/Samsung/U900+Soul/Free+Xbox+360+Elite.html">FREE XBOX 360 Elite!</a>. For the time being, these deals appear to only be available in the United Kingdom. Could this marketing strategy move to the U.S.? One can only hope.<br /><br />In the mean time, Samsung is also creating some fairly interesting video marketing materials. In my opinion, the video below doesn't do much for the marketing of cell phones, but it's pretty cool none the less. It's called simply; "10 optical Illusions in 2 minutes." Enjoy! <embed width="450" height="370" scale="showall" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.liveleak.com/e/0fe_1210831835" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" name="index"></embed><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/samsung-pulls-the-big-guns-on-nokia-motorola-sony-and-lg/">Samsung pulls the big guns on Nokia, Motorola, Sony and LG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 18 May 2008 16:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_u900_soul-2243.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/samsung-pulls-the-big-guns-on-nokia-motorola-sony-and-lg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1198631/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/18/samsung-pulls-the-big-guns-on-nokia-motorola-sony-and-lg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cell Phone Offers</category><category>CellPhoneOffers</category><category>engadget</category><category>Free</category><category>Free PS3</category><category>Free Wii</category><category>Free XBOX</category><category>FreePs3</category><category>FreeWii</category><category>FreeXbox</category><category>game systems</category><category>GameSystems</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Samsung</category><category>Samsung Soul</category><category>Samsung Soul U900</category><category>SamsungSoul</category><category>SamsungSoulU900</category><category>U900</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst initiations: GSK, LVLT, SVNT, FREE and SINA]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/analyst-initiations-gsk-lvlt-svnt-free-and-sina/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/analyst-initiations-gsk-lvlt-svnt-free-and-sina/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/analyst-initiations-gsk-lvlt-svnt-free-and-sina/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lvlt/" rel="tag">Level 3 Communications (LVLT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/svnt/" rel="tag">Savient Pharmaceuticals (SVNT)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> GlaxoSmithKline, FreeSeas and SINA Corp were today's noteworthy initiations:<br />
<ul>
    <li> ING believes GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/glaxosmithkline-plc/gsk/nys">GSK</a>) should benefit from the appointment of Andrew Witty as CEO and see limited downside risks. The firm initiated shares with a Buy rating. <br /></li>
    <li>FreeSeas (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/freeseas-inc/free/nas">FREE</a>) was started at Oppenheimer with an Outperform rating and $8 target, as they view FREE as an early stage growth company in the smaller dry-bulk vessel segment and finds the valuation attractive at current levels. <br /></li>
    <li>Kaufman Bros. initiated SINA Corp (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sina-corporation/sina/nas">SINA</a>) with a Buy rating and $4.50 target, and believes China represents a compelling long-term growth opportunity.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER INITIATIONS:<br /></strong>
<ul>
    <li> Level 3 Comm (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/level-3-communications-inc/lvlt/nas">LVLT</a>) was initiated with a Underperform rating at Wachovia. <br /></li>
    <li>Jefferies assumed Savient Pharma (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/savient-pharmaceuticals-inc/svnt/nas">SVNT</a>) with a Buy rating and $30 target. <br /></li>
    <li>Lehman initiated Brown &amp; Brown (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/brown-and-brown-inc/bro/nys">BRO</a>) with an Underweight rating.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/analyst-initiations-gsk-lvlt-svnt-free-and-sina/">Analyst initiations: GSK, LVLT, SVNT, FREE and SINA</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/analyst-initiations-gsk-lvlt-svnt-free-and-sina/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1154663/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/analyst-initiations-gsk-lvlt-svnt-free-and-sina/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>free</category><category>freeseas</category><category>glaxosmithkline</category><category>gsk</category><category>level 3</category><category>level three</category><category>Level3</category><category>LevelThree</category><category>lvlt</category><category>savient</category><category>sina</category><category>svnt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst inititations: FREE, NKTR, ALTU and ABH]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/analyst-inititations-free-nktr-altu-and-abh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/analyst-inititations-free-nktr-altu-and-abh/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/analyst-inititations-free-nktr-altu-and-abh/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ptr/" rel="tag">PetroChina Co Ltd ADR (PTR)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> FreeSeas, Nektar, Altus Pharmaceuticals and AbitibiBowater were today's noteworthy initiations:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Cantor initiated shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/freeseas-inc/free/nas">FreeSeas</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/freeseas-inc/free/nas">FREE</a>) with a Buy rating and $10 target, as they expect the company to benefit from the continued strength in the dry bulk market. <br /></li>
    <li>JP Morgan resumed coverage of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nektar-therapeutics/nktr/nas">Nektar</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nektar-therapeutics/nktr/nas">NKTR</a>) with an Overweight rating, as they view weakness from the discontinuation of Exubera as a buying opportunity given the company's base royalty business and pipeline opportunities. <br /></li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altus-pharmaceuticals-inc/altu/nas">Altus Pharmaceuticals</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altus-pharmaceuticals-inc/altu/nas">ALTU</a>) was initiated with a Buy rating and $19 target at Jefferies. The firm expects news flow from the company's two lead products over the next 6-12 months that should act as catalysts. <br /></li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abitibibowater-inc/abh/nys">AbitibiBowater</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/abitibibowater-inc/abh/nys">ABH</a>) was initiated with a Sell rating and $18 target at Banc of America, as they are cautious on newsprint trends; the firm recommends reducing existing positions.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER INITIATIONS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Caris initiated <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/collective-brands-inc/pss/nys">Collective Brands</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/collective-brands-inc/pss/nys">PSS</a>) with an Average rating and $18 target and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/under-armour-inc/ua/nys">Under Armour</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/under-armour-inc/ua/nys">UA</a>) with an Above Average rating. <br /></li>
    <li>Stifel started shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/patriot-coal-corp/pcx/nys">Patriot Coal</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/patriot-coal-corp/pcx/nys">PCX</a>) with a Hold rating. <br /></li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/petrochina-company-limited/ptr/nys">PetroChina</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/petrochina-company-limited/ptr/nys">PTR</a>) was initiated with a Sell rating at Goldman.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/analyst-inititations-free-nktr-altu-and-abh/">Analyst inititations: FREE, NKTR, ALTU and ABH</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/analyst-inititations-free-nktr-altu-and-abh/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1035199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/09/analyst-inititations-free-nktr-altu-and-abh/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abh</category><category>abitibibowater</category><category>altu</category><category>altus</category><category>analyst</category><category>collective brands</category><category>CollectiveBrands</category><category>free</category><category>freeseas</category><category>initiation</category><category>nektar</category><category>nktr</category><category>patriot coal</category><category>PatriotCoal</category><category>pcx</category><category>petrochina</category><category>pss</category><category>ptr</category><category>ua</category><category>under armour</category><category>UnderArmour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Warren Buffett shouldn't have bet against the Red Sox]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/warren-buffett-shouldnt-have-bet-against-the-red-sox/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/warren-buffett-shouldnt-have-bet-against-the-red-sox/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/warren-buffett-shouldnt-have-bet-against-the-red-sox/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p>Warren Buffett bought a prominent Massachusetts furniture company -- Jordan's Furniture -- in <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9501E6DA1730F931A25753C1A96F958260">1999 for between $200 million and $300 million</a>. At the beginning of the season, Jordan's announced it would reimburse the furniture purchases of anyone who bought sofas, dining tables, beds, and mattresses there between March 7 and April 16 if the Red Sox won the World Series this year. </p>
<p>According to the <em><a href="http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2007/10/23/jordans_shoppers_sitting_pretty_if_sox_win/">Boston Globe</a></em>, Jordan's took almost 30,000 orders during the contest. One customer stands to get back $40,000. Jordan's covered this bet through an insurance policy. It would not disclose which company issued the policy, but it would not shock me if it was issued by <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>).</p>
<p>As a lifelong Boston Red Sox fan, I am absolutely thrilled that they are in the World Series for the second time in a few years. And last night's blowout victory against Colorado was a great way to start. Unfortunately, my years of being disappointed by the Red Sox are making me wary about whether they can keep pulling off wins.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/warren-buffett-shouldnt-have-bet-against-the-red-sox/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Warren Buffett shouldn't have bet against the Red Sox</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/warren-buffett-shouldnt-have-bet-against-the-red-sox/">Warren Buffett shouldn't have bet against the Red Sox</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/warren-buffett-shouldnt-have-bet-against-the-red-sox/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1021775/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/warren-buffett-shouldnt-have-bet-against-the-red-sox/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>Boston Red Sox</category><category>BostonRedSox</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>free</category><category>Jordan's Furniture</category><category>Jordan'sFurniture</category><category>Red Sox</category><category>RedSox</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NBC announces free downloads, bites Apple (AAPL)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/nbc-announces-free-downloads-bites-apple/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/nbc-announces-free-downloads-bites-apple/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/nbc-announces-free-downloads-bites-apple/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="160" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/nbc-ge-logo.jpg"  alt="NBC logo" />NBC, a division of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), announced late today that it would offer free downloads of its popular TV shows. The programming will be available for PC viewing. TV commercials will remain in the shows and cannot be skipped. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/19/business/20nbc-web.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">According to</a> <em>The New York Times</em>, the shows can be downloaded for one week after they are broadcast. "The NBC service, called NBC Direct, will begin a testing period in October with plans to be operational in November."</p>
<p>Perhaps it is a coincidence, but the programs will only work on Windows-based PCs. NBC cut its ties with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) iTunes at the beginning of the month. </p>
<p>PaidContent <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-nbc-to-launch-video-download-service/">writes</a> that eventually, users will be able to freely subscribe to pre-selected NBC programs, which will be sent to their computer right after the first broadcast airing. NBC's plans for the next year may include the ability for consumers to own the content permanently instead of having a file that expires a week after a show airs.</p>
<p>The move by the network, which is likely to be followed by other large content owners, may well be an effective way to break the strangle-hold that iTunes has on digital content. NBC did not want Apple to set the pricing for its shows. Offering the content for free would seem to trump that.</p>
<p>Steve Jobs will not be able to check out the new competition. The offering will not work on his Mac.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/nbc-announces-free-downloads-bites-apple/">NBC announces free downloads, bites Apple (AAPL)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/nbc-announces-free-downloads-bites-apple/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/993759/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/nbc-announces-free-downloads-bites-apple/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>downloads</category><category>featured</category><category>free</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>iTunes</category><category>NBC</category><category>NBC Direct</category><category>NbcDirect</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SpiralFrog's free music: Should Apple (AAPL) worry?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/spiralfrogs-free-music-should-apple-aapl-worry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/spiralfrogs-free-music-should-apple-aapl-worry/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/spiralfrogs-free-music-should-apple-aapl-worry/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="79" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/spiralfrog-logo.gif" alt="SpiralFrog logo" />Free music downloads, sweet! Digital music newcomer <a href="http://www.spiralfrog.com/">SpiralFrog</a> went live yesterday, giving away tunes to all us Thifty McLintpockets, sticking it to <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/">iTunes</a>, asking only that we show a little love to its sponsors. Are we back in the <a href="http://www.napster.com/">Napster</a> shopping-spree days of 2000, ready to grind our employers' networks to a standstill?<br /><br />Not quite. The tragically titled SpiralFrog -- run by the private Mohen Inc., whose interests appear to be solely this venture -- bills itself as "the market-driven solution to illicit pirate file-sharing sites." It claims to be gunning not so much for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>)'s iTunes or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>)'s forthcoming MP3 site, but instead challenging amorphous peer-to-peer MP3 networks like LimeWire and Soulseek, priding itself on being free of viruses, spyware and other nasties.<br /><br />Not that this is a bad idea -- it's actually a very good, very natural idea. No need to point out that well before websites gave away content for a smattering of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/the-many-ads-of-experian-expn-separating-fact-from-fiction/">mortgage lenders' ads</a>, radio, network television, magazines and newspapers were all available freely or at least affordably as advertisers footed the bills. So why couldn't music downloads work as well?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/spiralfrogs-free-music-should-apple-aapl-worry/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SpiralFrog's free music: Should Apple (AAPL) worry?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/spiralfrogs-free-music-should-apple-aapl-worry/">SpiralFrog's free music: Should Apple (AAPL) worry?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.spiralfrog.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/spiralfrogs-free-music-should-apple-aapl-worry/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/991403/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/spiralfrogs-free-music-should-apple-aapl-worry/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>advertising</category><category>Apple</category><category>digital music</category><category>DigitalMusic</category><category>downloads</category><category>DRM</category><category>eCommerce</category><category>featured</category><category>free</category><category>iPod</category><category>iTunes</category><category>marketing</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>music</category><category>review</category><category>SpiralFrog</category><category>Zune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Summerlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[I made my best investment ever (and didn't consult Jim Cramer about it)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>My wife and I were at our local <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) branch today and we signed some important papers. The documents we put our names to probably represent the single best investment we have made in our time together. Utilizing a portion of a rather handsome income tax return and some carefully thought out timing, we as a couple today reduced our consumer debt load by approximately 25%.</p>
<p>Being in debt has always made my skin crawl, though I fully understand the reasons why we do it. If you want a nice house and a fine automobile or two, the chances are that the only way you can pull it off is by borrowing the funds to make it possible. That doesn't change the fact though that I hate being in debt, and whenever the opportunities present themselves I do what I reasonably can to reduce my debt level.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>I made my best investment ever (and didn't consult Jim Cramer about it)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/">I made my best investment ever (and didn't consult Jim Cramer about it)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/874152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/i-made-my-best-investment-ever-and-didnt-consult-jim-cramer-ab/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget</category><category>budgeting</category><category>debt</category><category>dividends</category><category>equity</category><category>free</category><category>interest</category><category>load</category><category>personal finance</category><category>PersonalFinance</category><category>reduce</category><category>reduction</category><category>retirement</category><category>saving money</category><category>SavingMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Giving away free coffee: theft or good for business?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/giving-away-free-coffee-theft-or-good-for-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/giving-away-free-coffee-theft-or-good-for-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/giving-away-free-coffee-theft-or-good-for-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/starbucks_bw_240.jpg" alt="i always have to bring my wallet to the local starbucks" />While I'm occasionally offered refills at no charge at my local independent coffee shop, I'm never offered free drinks at either that establishment or my local Starbucks Corporation (NADSAQ:SBUX) outlet. (And I'm nice, really I am!) Yet many customers, if a <a href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/_/2006/12/starbucks_custo.html#comments">recent thread at Starbucks Gossip is any indication</a>, are. One (must be <em>extremely</em> nice) customer writes in to say that she's comped as much as 2/3 of her drinks.<br />The post started quite a discussion about free beverages, with one angry district manager writing in to claim that this was theft, and if he were their boss, he'd fire the whole lot of 'em. Some other equally angry and righteous commenters agreed, but the general consensus was that occasional free beverages were good for business -- "Surprise and Delight" 'em, the concept goes, and they'll keep coming back and spending their money in your store. And putting lots of extra bills in your tip jar!<br /><br />Sure, if a customer is getting most of her drinks free, and putting the $2 in the tip jar instead of the till, that equation is pretty straightforward: sorry guys, that's just a tiny bit of bad ethics there. But a once-a-week freebie for great customers or even (as one barista mentioned) confused out-of-towners? I'm thinking that it will serve to increase business and customer goodwill.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/giving-away-free-coffee-theft-or-good-for-business/">Giving away free coffee: theft or good for business?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/giving-away-free-coffee-theft-or-good-for-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/714822/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/07/giving-away-free-coffee-theft-or-good-for-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barista</category><category>comp</category><category>comped</category><category>comped coffee</category><category>CompedCoffee</category><category>comps</category><category>free</category><category>free coffee</category><category>free starbucks</category><category>FreeCoffee</category><category>FreeStarbucks</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>starbucks gossip</category><category>StarbucksGossip</category><category>starbucsk</category><category>tip</category><category>tip your barista</category><category>tips</category><category>TipYourBarista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AOL giving away the milk: will anyone pay for the cow?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="at aol.com" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/ataoldotcom.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />My sister Hannah is the answer to the question, why are AOL's subscriptions falling? A dabbler in the internet, she and her family paid for AOL dialup for years; even though she's now married with a real job, she's kept her AOL address from when she still lived at home with my parents. Last month, she called us to ask about this wonderful world of high-speed internet, and a few days later, Comcast came into her home and switched her over. She cancelled her AOL account.</p>
<p>Many like Hannah have kept their AOL account just for the email address. And though two-thirds of U.S. internet users now have high-speed internet access, AOL's user base is very different; approximately one-third of AOL users are high-speed customers, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/aol-poised-to-offer-more-free-services/n20060724132209990003">according to the AP</a>. Yet Time Warner is rumored to be considering a very radical plan: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/11/time-warner-losing-1-billion-to-make-aol-free-for-some/">making the coveted aol.com addresses free for users who have switched to other providers' high-speed services</a>.</p>
<p>With Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft all offering a wide variety of free email options, and AOL's content now available to all comers, competitive strategy seems to dictate that Time Warner's decision should be already be made. Is board, who might say yes to the plan in their meeting this Thursday, will have to weigh the potential dollar losses (said to be $1 billion between now and 2009) against the untold customer goodwill and increased "eyeballs."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AOL giving away the milk: will anyone pay for the cow?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/">AOL giving away the milk: will anyone pay for the cow?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/aol-poised-to-offer-more-free-services/n20060724132209990003>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/646397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/24/aol-giving-away-the-milk-will-anyone-pay-for-the-cow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>aol email</category><category>aol email address</category><category>aol for free</category><category>aol free</category><category>aol llc</category><category>aol.com</category><category>AolEmail</category><category>AolEmailAddress</category><category>AolForFree</category><category>AolFree</category><category>AolLlc</category><category>board meeting</category><category>BoardMeeting</category><category>email addresses</category><category>EmailAddresses</category><category>free</category><category>free aol</category><category>FreeAol</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner board meeting</category><category>time warner strategy</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerBoardMeeting</category><category>TimeWarnerStrategy</category><category>twx</category><category>twx board meeting</category><category>TwxBoardMeeting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:46:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
