<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Merck, Schering-Plough earnings show big pharma isn't dead]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/merck-schering-plough-earnings-show-big-pharma-isnt-dead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/merck-schering-plough-earnings-show-big-pharma-isnt-dead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/merck-schering-plough-earnings-show-big-pharma-isnt-dead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><p>Now that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-38-co-inc/mrk/nys">Merck &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-38-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/schering-plough-corporation/sgp/nys">Schering-Plough Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/schering-plough-corporation/sgp/nys">SGP</a>) both posted better-than-expected second quarter earnings, will investors show some love to big pharma?</p>
<p>Shares of Merck are down about 5% over the past three months while Schering-Plough has eeked out a mere 2.5% gain. Perhaps investors are worried about Merck's Vioxx legal battles, which so far it has largely won, and the controversy surrounding its cervical cancer vaccine Gardisal. Schering-Plough's $14.4 billion acquisition of Akzo Nobel's Oreganon unit may also be concerning some people. Maybe people think that if <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer</a> Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/pfizer-results-pfall-pflat/">up the creek</a>, all big drug companies are in the same boat.</p>
<p>Regardless, both companies posted impressive numbers that should quell the concerns of investors. Their stocks remain pretty cheap. Merck trades at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 17, slightly cheaper than Schering-Plough's 20.</p>
<p>Merck, based in Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mercks-2nd-quarter-profit-rises/n20070723082409990009">reported net income</a> of $1.65 billion or 77 cents, up from $1.5 billion, or 69 cents a year earlier. Revenue jumped 5.9% to $6.1 billion fueled by demand for blockbusters such as the high-cholestoral treatment Vytorin which it makes in a joint venture with Schering Ploug. Excluding some costs, Merck earned 82 cents, beating the 72 cent-average estimate of analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial. The revenue figure also beat the $5.77 billion, analysts had expected.</p>
<p>Vytorin also <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/schering-plough-profit-more-than-doubles/n20070723083009990042">boosted results</a> at Kenilworth, NJ-based Schering Plough. Net income climbed to $539 million, or 34 cents a share, more than doubling from $259 million, or 16 cents. Revenue jumped 14% to $3.2 billion. Excluding some costs, profit was 41 cents, beating the conesensus forecasts of 35 cents. Revenue also beat expectations of $3.07 billion.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/merck-schering-plough-earnings-show-big-pharma-isnt-dead/">Merck, Schering-Plough earnings show big pharma isn't dead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mercks-2nd-quarter-profit-rises/n20070723082409990009>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/merck-schering-plough-earnings-show-big-pharma-isnt-dead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/946939/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/merck-schering-plough-earnings-show-big-pharma-isnt-dead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>big pharma</category><category>BigPharma</category><category>drug companies</category><category>drug stocks</category><category>DrugCompanies</category><category>DrugStocks</category><category>gardisal</category><category>mrk</category><category>pharmaceutical companies</category><category>PharmaceuticalCompanies</category><category>schering-Plough</category><category>sgp</category><category>vioxx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:07:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
