<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is now a good time for the U.S. to kick its oil habit?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/is-now-a-good-time-for-the-u-s-to-kick-its-oil-habit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/is-now-a-good-time-for-the-u-s-to-kick-its-oil-habit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/is-now-a-good-time-for-the-u-s-to-kick-its-oil-habit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/oklahoma-city-oil-derrick.jpg" />With <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$WTIC">oil prices</a> cut in half and gasoline near (or below) $2 per gallon, is now a good time for the U.S. to end its century-long addiction to oil? <br /><br />The topic was raised by none other than the 'liberal bastion' of <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wall Street Journal</span> Monday (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122660968559325625.html">subscription required0</a> with energy analysts and policy makers weighing in.<br /><br />BloggingStocks Monday asked Energy Trader Jim Dietz to evaluate some of the major recommendations discussed. <br />
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Four-day work week:</span> "It's possible, but the best plan would be voluntary, allowing companies to opt in/out and adopt plans that meet their production needs," Dietz said. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Mandated higher MPG for vehicles:</span> "This is almost certain to be proposed by President-elect Obama, and will likely pass the Congress. It will reduce gasoline and diesel consumption."</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Mandated flex-fuel cars:</span> "Another measure likely to become federal law and it would take pressure off oil consumption." </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Tax credit for fuel-efficient vehicles:</span> "Another oil saver, and it stands a better than 50% chance of being passed by the next Congress."<br /></li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Federal funds for next-gen vehicle:</span> "This will likely be included in any rescue package for General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler. A next-generation vehicle would be a game-changer, energy wise, but it's years away."</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/is-now-a-good-time-for-the-u-s-to-kick-its-oil-habit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is now a good time for the U.S. to kick its oil habit?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/is-now-a-good-time-for-the-u-s-to-kick-its-oil-habit/">Is now a good time for the U.S. to kick its oil habit?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/is-now-a-good-time-for-the-u-s-to-kick-its-oil-habit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1374409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/is-now-a-good-time-for-the-u-s-to-kick-its-oil-habit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy sources</category><category>CAFE</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>gas tax</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GasTax</category><category>hybrids</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>oil prices</category><category>Republicans</category><category>solar power</category><category>trade</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>TradeDeficit</category><category>wind power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>The odds of a 2007 Energy Bill passing the Democratic Party-led U.S. Congress, with President Bush's blessing, "Are still likely," according to a Washington-based, public policy lobbyist with knowledge of the matter.<br /><br />"The bill will need a few revisions, but I'd say it's a 70/30 go, in favor of the bill being signed by the president," the lobbyist told Bloggingstocks Tuesday, on condition he not be identified by name.<br /><br />The lobbyist, who represents primarily Democratic Party-based constituencies, said the the bill's renewable energy component and potential tax increases remain the hangups in the bill.<br /><br /> <strong>Modification likely</strong><br /><br />"More than likely President Bush will get the renewable energy component modified, but the Democrats may gain extra footing with better solar/wind energy credits," he said.<br /><br />The bill current would require utilities to generate more power from renewable energy. Lawmakers from the Southeast U.S. have said they're concerned that utilities in their states will not be able to meet the requirement, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119674224083012902.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">due to a lack of wind power,</a><em> The Wall Street Journal</em> reported.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/">Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1054686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 presidential election</category><category>biofuels</category><category>Bush</category><category>CAFE</category><category>cars</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>electricity</category><category>energy bill</category><category>environment</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>gas tax</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>light trucks</category><category>mpg</category><category>natural gas</category><category>President Bush</category><category>presidential election</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>Republicans</category><category>solar energy</category><category>SUVs</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>utilities</category><category>voters</category><category>wind power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
