<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[ExxonMobil: NOT a gay-friendly workplace]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/20/exxonmobil-not-a-gay-friendly-workplace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/20/exxonmobil-not-a-gay-friendly-workplace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/20/exxonmobil-not-a-gay-friendly-workplace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img width="228" height="175" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/exxon_mobil.gif" alt="" />ExxonMobil, says the Human Rights Campaign, is a big zero. A new report out from HRC, the nation's largest lesbian and gay political organization, scores American companies on how well they are reaching out to their gay and lesbian workforce, and ExxonMobil finds itself at the <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-09-19T202942Z_01_N19432262_RTRIDST_0_LIFE-WORK-UPDATE-1.XML">bottom of the list</a>.<br /><br />According to the report from HRC, companies are scored in handful of areas. For a company to receive a perfect score they must demonstrate that they have policies in place for banning discrimination based on sexual orientation, they must provide partner benefits, offer diversity training, and advertise to the gay community. Several companies that we follow closely on BloggingStocks scored perfect 100's in the report. They include Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>), Apple Computer Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-computer-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Dell Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>). Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) came in with an 85 score.<br /><br />As For ExxonMobil Corp. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>)... well, the picture isn't so pretty. Exxon managed to be one of only three companies in the report that came in with a <strong>score of zero</strong>. Why the poor score? The company did not even offer minimal benefits or workplace protection for gay employees. When asked about the report ExxonMobil spokesman Russ Roberts stated that Exxon relied on used the "definition of spouse used in federal legislation, which has the effect of limiting coverage to heterosexual couples," but also added that XOM had in place "written policies [that] prohibit discrimination or harassment for any reason, including sexual orientation." Apparently that wasn't enough to give them any points for good measure. Only two other companies came in with zero scores: Midwestern retailer Meijer Inc. and Plano, Texas-based Perot Systems technology consultants.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/20/exxonmobil-not-a-gay-friendly-workplace/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ExxonMobil: NOT a gay-friendly workplace</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/20/exxonmobil-not-a-gay-friendly-workplace/">ExxonMobil: NOT a gay-friendly workplace</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/20/exxonmobil-not-a-gay-friendly-workplace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/672043/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/20/exxonmobil-not-a-gay-friendly-workplace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>fortune 500</category><category>Fortune500</category><category>gay</category><category>gay and lesbian</category><category>gay benefits</category><category>gay rights</category><category>gay-friendly</category><category>GayAndLesbian</category><category>GayBenefits</category><category>GayRights</category><category>homo</category><category>homosexual</category><category>hrc</category><category>Human Rights Campaign</category><category>HumanRightsCampaign</category><category>lesbian</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
