<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Nasdaq to buy PHLX]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/newspaper-wrap-up/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/newspaper-wrap-up/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/newspaper-wrap-up/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nasdaq-stock-market-inc-the/ndaq/nas">Nasdaq Stock Market</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nasdaq-stock-market-inc-the/ndaq/nas">NDAQ</a>) will acquire the Philadelphia Stock Exchange for $652M, reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119443924138485191.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required).</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) announced yesterday that it fired Chief Information Officer Stuart L. Scott on Friday for violating company policies, although the company did not specify an exact reason for the dismissal, reported the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/business/07soft.html?ref=business"><em>Associated Press</em></a>.</li>
    <li>Laurence Fink, the chairman and CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blackrock-inc/blk/nys">BlackRock</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blackrock-inc/blk/nys">BLK</a>), has met with the executive search firm responsible for filling the CEO vacancy at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>). Fink is believed to be the leading candidate to become Merrill's CEO, according to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/business/07merrill.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin"><em>New York Times</em></a>.</li>
</ul>
<strong>WEBSITES:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/07/google-games-adsense/"><em>GigaOM</em></a> reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is kicking off its game-focused advertising initiative later this month, according to inside sources. </li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/newspaper-wrap-up/">Newspaper wrap-up: Nasdaq to buy PHLX</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/newspaper-wrap-up/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1032684/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/newspaper-wrap-up/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ap</category><category>associated press</category><category>AssociatedPress</category><category>blackrock</category><category>blk</category><category>gigaom</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>mer</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>ndaq</category><category>newspaper</category><category>ny time</category><category>NyTime</category><category>paper</category><category>periodical</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CNET's blog empire is too late]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/cnets-blog-empire-is-too-late/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/cnets-blog-empire-is-too-late/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/cnets-blog-empire-is-too-late/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET Networks, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas">CNET</a>) <a href="http://news.com.com/8300-10784_3-7.html?tag=ne.tab.hd">is launching</a> a group of blogs in the hope of expanding its news coverage and appeal to a broader base. The company's stock did not move and is down today. In early 2006, the shares traded for almost $16. They now rarely trade above $9.</p>
<p>CNET would seem to be a good business. With the immense need for information its tech news service, download center, and reviews of new devices would seem to be critical to the needs of executives following in the industry and consumer electronics buyers.</p>
<p>But, as some observers <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2007/06/20/blog-rolling-at-cnet.aspx">have pointed out</a>, online readers turn to blogs like Gigaom and TechCruch for the kinds of information CNET used to have. The blogs are often faster at breaking news and have more of an edge in reviewing new electronics. This may be because the newer websites do not rely on mainstream advertisers for most of their revenue. </p>
<p>And, the blogs have gotten big, very big. A recent look at Alexa rankings show CNET as the 153 most visited web destination. But, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/">Engadget</a> is No. 641 and <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a> is No. 644. These blogs do not have to support the large editorial and infrastructure costs that CNET does.</p>
<p>It is too late for CNET to get into the tech blog business. It is already commanded by independent operators with large audiences and rock-bottom costs. CNET's only open tactic is down the M&amp;A road and perhaps the industry will see some consolidation. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/cnets-blog-empire-is-too-late/">CNET's blog empire is too late</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/cnets-blog-empire-is-too-late/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/923441/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/cnets-blog-empire-is-too-late/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNET</category><category>Engadget</category><category>Gigaom</category><category>TechCrunch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Wall Street yawning at CES this week?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/is-wall-street-yawning-at-ces-this-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/is-wall-street-yawning-at-ces-this-week/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/is-wall-street-yawning-at-ces-this-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mot/" rel="tag">Motorola (MOT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/qcom/" rel="tag">QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/ces_logo2.jpg" alt="" />Does Wall Street care about all the glamour and glitz currently being touted at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas this week? Well, after a day of large announcements, <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/08/wall-street-to-ces-yawn/">both the NYSE and the 'DAQ held firm</a> on either small losses or tiny gains form some of the largest names in the consumer electronics and computer industries -- Microsoft Corporation(NASDAQ:MSFT), Apple Computers, Inc.(NASDAQ:AAPL), Motorola(NYSE:MOT)and Qualcomm(NASDAQ:QCOM).<br /><br />In other words, the street is waiting to see if all these 'grand visions' turn into revenue reality. Most of them will not -- for all the earth-shaking announcements and product unveilings at each year's CES, very few fruitful consumer consumables come out of the mix. Mostly, these ghosts are the grand visions that the keynoters talk about, like Microsoft's Bill Gates touting yet another "converged" living room universe and Motorola's Ed Zander saying that "everything will be going mobile" in regards to consumer electronics. I'm not sure I want that 50" plasma TV going anywhere, thank you very much.<br /><br />So, is it any wonder that the <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/08/wall-street-to-ces-yawn/">CES even this week has failed to wake up Wall Street</a> in a way that stock option-hungry executives would like it to? The results are in the pudding -- consumer sales and revenue gains along with growth -- and so far, the pudding bowl is quite empty.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/is-wall-street-yawning-at-ces-this-week/">Is Wall Street yawning at CES this week?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gigaom.com/2007/01/08/wall-street-to-ces-yawn/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/is-wall-street-yawning-at-ces-this-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/732493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/09/is-wall-street-yawning-at-ces-this-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>CES</category><category>CES Sow</category><category>CesSow</category><category>GigaOm</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Wall Srtee</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallSrtee</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blogs are cashing in]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/taulli/176026742/"><img height="210" alt="online content" src="http://static.flickr.com/56/176026742_7f6d61fb21_o.png" width="136" align="right" /></a></p>
<p>This week, the <a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal</a> wrote about how venture capital is starting to seep into the blogosphere ("Bloggers Find Financial Backers For Their Independent News Sites").</p>
<p>Deja vu&nbsp; all over again?&nbsp; Interestingly enough, back in the 1990s, there was a flood of money that flowed into content deals. Yes, some journalists were becoming dot-com multimillionaires. However, when Nasdaq collapsed, so did many of these ventures.&nbsp; In fact, there was a book on the topic -- <em>Starving to Death on $200 Million</em> - which chronicled the implosion of the Industry Standard.</p>
<p>So, to use an ominous phrase:&nbsp; is this time different?&nbsp; Perhaps so.&nbsp; Actually, the attraction of blogs is that they are fairly low cost.&nbsp; This makes it possible to make money from niche categories.&nbsp; Also, it is fairly easy to scale-up (since bandwidth is extremely cheap).</p>
<p>Some examples of recent financings:&nbsp; Alan Patricof, who invested in <a href="http://www.apple.com">Apple</a>&nbsp;at the start-up phase, has put his own money in <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org">PaidContent.org</a>; True Venture Partners invested in <a href="http://www.gigaom.com">GigaOm.com</a>, a popular blog by Om Malik, a writer for Business 2.0 (which is a publication of <a href="http://www.timewarner.com">Time Warner</a>); and Mark Cuban, who sold Broadcast.com to Yahoo!, invested in Sharesleuth.com.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Blogs are cashing in</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/">Blogs are cashing in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/637219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blogs</category><category>Business 2.0</category><category>Business2.0</category><category>GigaOm</category><category>Google</category><category>Om Malik</category><category>OmMalik</category><category>PaidContent.org</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vonage IPO sinks below offer: all eBay's fault?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/vonage-ipo-sinks-below-offer-all-ebays-fault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/vonage-ipo-sinks-below-offer-all-ebays-fault/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/vonage-ipo-sinks-below-offer-all-ebays-fault/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p>The question on everyone's lips today, as they watched <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1036_3-6076130.html">Vonage stock sink lower and lower</a>,&nbsp;until it was&nbsp;nearly $2.50 below its $17 offering price, was: is it all Skype's (and therefore, eBay's) fault? More to the point, was it all <a href="http://www.andykessler.com/andy_kessler/2006/05/vonage_sucker_p.html">Andy Kessler</a>'s fault?</p>
<p>When Skype first announced their free SkypeOut calling in the U.S. and Canada, <a href="http://gigaom.com/2006/05/16/will-skype-free-ko-vonage-ipo">Kessler wrote for GigaOm</a>, wondering if this move was a catlike (in the sense that cats are evilly playful, like Tom of <em>Tom &amp; Jerry</em>, but smarter): "Vonage is begging customers to buy 20% of the deal - not a great sign. <a id="more-6295"></a>Ebay knows this, why not toy with the mouse before you kill it. What better way to do away with the Vonage IPO and raise their cost of capital then scare investors even more," he wrote.</p>
<p>Commenters excoriated him, complaining that he was both bitter and wrong. Today he had the last word, and wrote, "Here's how not to do a deal. Citigroup raised the number of shares in the deal, but not the price." That, Kessler, says, was the wrong move in an uncertain climate (investors hardly knew whether Vonage had <em>any</em> value when SkypeOut is <strong>free</strong>). What's more, pricing at the middle of the $16-$18 range, always&nbsp;a questionable strategy, proved to be egg all over Citigroup's face. Vonage has money, Citigroup has its fee, and all the&nbsp;investors who bought at $17 now have lots of places toward which to shake their fists.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/vonage-ipo-sinks-below-offer-all-ebays-fault/">Vonage IPO sinks below offer: all eBay's fault?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 May 2006 18:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/2100-1036_3-6076130.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/vonage-ipo-sinks-below-offer-all-ebays-fault/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/621647/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/vonage-ipo-sinks-below-offer-all-ebays-fault/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andy kessler</category><category>AndyKessler</category><category>cat</category><category>cat and mouse</category><category>CatAndMouse</category><category>ebay</category><category>free skypout</category><category>FreeSkypout</category><category>gigaom</category><category>ipo</category><category>kessler</category><category>skype</category><category>skype out</category><category>SkypeOut</category><category>tom</category><category>tom and jerry</category><category>TomAndJerry</category><category>vonage</category><category>vonage ipo</category><category>VonageIpo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 18:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reviews of new search engine, 'Sphere']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/reviews-of-new-search-engine-sphere/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/reviews-of-new-search-engine-sphere/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/reviews-of-new-search-engine-sphere/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/sphere.gif"alt="" /><a href="http://www.sphere.com/">Sphere</a>, a new search engine with $3.75 million in VC funding from HearstPublishing, Trident Capital and About.com founder Scott Kurnit, launched this week. GigaOm <ahref="http://gigaom.com/2005/10/08/sphere-the-relevant-blog-search/">reviewed</a> the site last fall, giving it athumbs-up. Zdnet also gives it a <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=2959">good review,</a> noting that is"generally speedy" and the interface is "clean and easy to navigate." Here are some otherreviews:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/01/new-blog-search-engine-sphere-launches/">TechCrunch</a>:&nbsp;"As great as the basic search platform is, what I like best about Sphere is in the Tools area. Install the"Sphere It" bookmarklet and click it whenever you are reading something that you'd like moreinformation on. Sphere will analyze the page in real time and present blog search results that are relevant to thattopic. It's important to note that this is not a search to find blogs linking into that page you are viewing;rather you are finding fresh blog content that is related to the subject matter of what you are reading. I'vetested this and find it extremely useful."</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/reviews-of-new-search-engine-sphere/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reviews of new search engine, 'Sphere'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/reviews-of-new-search-engine-sphere/">Reviews of new search engine, 'Sphere'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 May 2006 13:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/reviews-of-new-search-engine-sphere/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/614601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/reviews-of-new-search-engine-sphere/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Businessweek</category><category>GigaOm</category><category>ResearchBuzz</category><category>Search Engine Marketing Weblog</category><category>SearchEngineMarketingWeblog</category><category>Sphere</category><category>TechCrunch</category><category>The Social Software Blog</category><category>TheSocialSoftwareBlog</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dakota Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 13:49:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
