<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ad pages at Conde Nast down nearly a third]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/condenastlogo.jpg" />The broader economy is showing signs that we can at least interpret as positive, but this doesn't extend to the media industry, it seems. Cond&eacute; Nast's ad page results are out for its 2009 issues, now that the last issue of the year has been sold for each of them ... <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/business/media/12mag.html" target="_blank">and the situation is grim</a>. </p>
<p>Cond&eacute; Nast lost 8,359 ad pages this year, according to a report released on Wednesday. Ad pages have plunged 30% this year. Cost cutting has been used to offset the revenue declines, with more than 450 positions removed this year and several magazines shuttered, including <em>Gourmet</em> and <em>Modern Bride</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ad pages at Conde Nast down nearly a third</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/">Ad pages at Conde Nast down nearly a third</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234682/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/ad-pages-at-conde-nast-down-nearly-a-third/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bride</category><category>Conde Nast</category><category>Conde Nast Traveler</category><category>details</category><category>glamour magazine</category><category>gourmet</category><category>graydon carter</category><category>hearst</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazines</category><category>modern bride</category><category>new york times</category><category>nyt</category><category>print magazines</category><category>print media</category><category>publishing</category><category>time warner</category><category>twx</category><category>vanity fair</category><category>w magazine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options run out for print media]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/options-run-out-for-print-media/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/options-run-out-for-print-media/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/options-run-out-for-print-media/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p>Through the third week in January, advertising pages at <em>BusinessWeek </em>are down 31%. At <em>Entertainment Weekly, </em>they are off 36%. Through their February issues, <em>GQ</em> and <em>Gourmet's</em> ad pages are off over 30%.</p>
<p>Today, the news came out that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times Company</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) is close to selling part of its building. It has already taken money from Carlos Slim, some of which comes with a 14% interest rate. The Times is now nearly out of options. It won't sell <em>The Boston Globe</em> which some experts believe is losing $1 million a week. That leaves the option of raising money by dumping assets out of the question.</p>
<p>The third largest newspaper chain in the US, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-mcclatchy-company/mni/nys">McClatchy</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-mcclatchy-company/mni/nys">MNI</a>)<em> </em>which has insisted it would be OK, now trades below $1.</p>
<p>Most of this has been written about before, but the numbers from print media that have come in during the last three days show that an industry which was in decline is in such a rapid decline that scores of newspapers and magazines will close over the next two or three months. Even a year ago, this was unimaginable.</p>
<p>The print media is something that most business people cannot imagine. It is an industry in trouble which cannot be fixed. Intelligence and hard work has no effect. The end of many of the world's greatest print brands are is in sight.</p>
<p>The bleeding was supposed to be slow enough so that there were be time to work on solutions.That opportunity is now well in the past.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/options-run-out-for-print-media/">Options run out for print media</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/options-run-out-for-print-media/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1438406/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/options-run-out-for-print-media/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>businessweek</category><category>Gourmet</category><category>GQ</category><category>MNI</category><category>NYT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Too much information about Starbucks breakfast sandwiches]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/too-much-information-about-starbucks-breakfast-sandwiches/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/too-much-information-about-starbucks-breakfast-sandwiches/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/too-much-information-about-starbucks-breakfast-sandwiches/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img id="vimage_1" height="153" alt="Starbucks breakfast sandwich case" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/story.starbucks.breakfast.a.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ: <a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>) breakfast buzz, for what it's worth, seems to have died down for the moment, -- at least I'm no longer getting four or five news alerts daily in my email inbox. <a href="http://ebay.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/starbucks-giving-nyc-warm-food-manhattanites-second-class-citiz/">Like Portland</a>, this offerings are not new in my hometown of Seattle, and I failed to credit the interest their introduction would generate in <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,186857,00.html">the</a> <a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15062056/">mainstream</a> <a href="http://www.kgw.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D8KE3SSG0.html">media</a>. Online, some customers <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jjunh/183720463/">posted</a> their <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chrisheuer/99262531/">pictures</a> and comments of the breakfast purchase on Flickr. Warning: these are not professional, studio produced advertising shots, but actual representations of breakfast sandwiches in all their greasy glory -- not for the faint hearted. Although outside the breakfast area, a Tokyo lunch-goer called this Starbucks tuna melt <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jjunh/183720463/">yummy</a>, and it doesn't look quite so bad.<br /><br />The <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Starbucks Gossip </span>blog solicited <a href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/_/2006/10/hows_the_warm_b.html">barista reactions</a> to the NYC rollout of warm breakfast which has turned up a responses from Starbucks employees. "NycBearista" noting that he or she was the "warming partner" (I will not be surprised if that is an actual job title) on roll out day, noted that the new task made opening duties go much slower, and since it's now store policy to "warm anything."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/too-much-information-about-starbucks-breakfast-sandwiches/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Too much information about Starbucks breakfast sandwiches</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/too-much-information-about-starbucks-breakfast-sandwiches/">Too much information about Starbucks breakfast sandwiches</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/too-much-information-about-starbucks-breakfast-sandwiches/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/678525/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/too-much-information-about-starbucks-breakfast-sandwiches/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barista</category><category>breakfast</category><category>coffee</category><category>gourmet</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>sandwiches</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks sued over coupon -- the blogosphere reacts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img width="140" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="140" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/starbucksbw.gif" alt="Starbucks" id="vimage_1" />At <a href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/_/2006/09/starbucks_sued_.html">Starbucks Gossip bloggers and commentators are talking</a> about Friday's $114 million suit against Starbucks (<a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=" title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance">SBUX</a>) for the coupon debacle, which my <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/30/starbucks-giving-away-iced-coffee-oops/">colleague Sarah Gilbert reported on right here</a>. A class-action suit was probably inevitable given our litigious age and the company's profile. Starbucks has given the fact that the coupons were <a href="http://www.mediabuyerplanner.com/2006/08/31/starbucks_promo_goes_gangbuster/">alterted and distributed beyond their intended scope</a>, and the reason for cancelling the promotion.<br /><br />Comments at <a href="http://starbucksgossip.typepad.com/">Starbucks Gossip</a> are running about 2/3rds against the suit (by my very rough estimate) last time I checked. Some posters sound bemused over the whole mess, while others are outraged. P. Scranton said, "No wonder attorneys are held in such low esteem." Some people did write in to express feeling "betrayed" by Starbucks -- angry that a large company should get away with pulling back this freebie without some sort of penalty. Starbucks (some consumers seem to feel, anyway) picked up the ball and went home after too many people decided to play. JavaGrrl, who identifies herself as a longtime employee, says that the company was "embarrassed" (all caps) by the entire episode. For me, that embarrassment is punishment enough. I don't want to see a suit go forward, the stock fall, and the costs passed on to the consumer. <br /><br />The comment that had the funniest, and to me, the most sensible take on the entire matter was this from DeusX: "I think I will be suing my ex-gf of ten years ago, I have a 'good for one free backrub' coupon signed by her with no expiration date."<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/">Starbucks sued over coupon -- the blogosphere reacts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/666164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/11/starbucks-sued-over-coupon-the-blogosphere-reacts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogging</category><category>blogs</category><category>coffee</category><category>coupons</category><category>espresso</category><category>food and drink</category><category>FoodAndDrink</category><category>frappucino</category><category>gourmet</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>starbucks gossip</category><category>StarbucksGossip</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks podcasting commercial]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/podcasts/" rel="tag">Podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img id="vimage_1" height="150" alt="Coffee tasting" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/cuppinglineuplg.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Starbucks (<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>) has begun a series of podcasts <span class="copygray"><a href="http://www.starbucks.com/ourcoffees/coffeeconversations.asp?category%5Fname=Coffee+Conversations&amp;cookie%5Ftest=1">dedicated to the exploration and appreciation of coffee</a>. I've just listened to the first one so that you don't have to! Using podcasts (and blogging) as tools to educate your consumer base is nothing new, and Starbucks actually does very little of it. This series is tied in with the company's 35th anniversary, and will run weekly this month. Yep -- that "fad" company from Seattle is, in a couple incarnations anyway, thirty-five years old. <br /><br />They've run a short "promocast" of this series, that Frank Barnako of MarketWatch listened to and described as "<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7BE56A8544-AFB0-4F8C-970C-1214EDF61B05%7D&amp;keyword=">lukewarm</a>." So I ignored that and dove right into the full-length premiere today. Well, full-length turns out to be only twelve minutes long, so I don't know how much time I'll be saving you here. Say, nine minutes, if you read fairly fast, but every little bit helps ... <br /></span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks podcasting commercial</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/">Starbucks podcasting commercial</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/664304/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/starbucks-podcasting-commercial/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>espresso</category><category>food and drink</category><category>FoodAndDrink</category><category>gourmet</category><category>podcast</category><category>review</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 20:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks' reports 5% sales increase for August - blip or trend?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img id="vimage_2" alt="starbucks in august" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/starbucks_cookie.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Starbucks (<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>) retail sales disappointed in July, and analysts predicted August increases to be somewhere in the 4-5% range. Most predicted closer to 4%.<br /><br />Today Starbucks reported retails <span class="news_story">revenue of $617M for August -- a not-so-shabby<a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.asp?feed=OBR&amp;Date=20060831&amp;ID=5987342"> 5% increase</a>. It's a</span> little early to tell whether we can identify a tightening (or loosening) of consumer budgets affecting discretionary spending. Analysts are <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/30/AR2006083001405.html">waiting and watching</a> SBUX, which, I see from my googling daily, is one very popular benchmark that economists and financial analyst love to use to gauge this kind of spending. Starbucks <a href="http://www.newratings.com/analyst_news/article_1356200.html">maintained its "buy"</a> earlier this week from Dan Geiman of McAdams Wright Ragen.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/">Starbucks' reports 5% sales increase for August - blip or trend?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/662114/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/31/starbucks-reports-5-sales-increase-for-august-blip-or-trend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>earnings report</category><category>EarningsReport</category><category>espresso</category><category>frappucino</category><category>gourmet</category><category>retail</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>stock analysis</category><category>StockAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
