<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[General Motors Issues Forecast for IPO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/general-motors-issues-forecast-for-ipo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/general-motors-issues-forecast-for-ipo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/general-motors-issues-forecast-for-ipo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/gm-logo-240.jpg" />Very early Thursday morning, General Motors filed paperwork that <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/gm-expects-to-earn-up-to-21b-as-ipo/1374196/" target="_blank">pinned down a price range for its initial public offering</a> (IPO). Three of the four owners of GM (the U.S., Canadian and Ontario governments, and a union health care trust) are set to sell 365 million shares of the automaker. <br />
<br />
This number of shares is roughly a quarter of GM's outstanding stock. The triumvirate expects to sell the shares at a per-share price between $26 and $29. Should the shares sell in this range, the IPO would pull in roughly $10 billion for the trio. Again, if the shares do sell in this range -- then the U.S. government would reduce its stake in GM from 61% to slightly more than 40%. This scenario would net the U.S. Treasury nearly $7 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/general-motors-issues-forecast-for-ipo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>General Motors Issues Forecast for IPO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/general-motors-issues-forecast-for-ipo/">General Motors Issues Forecast for IPO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/general-motors-issues-forecast-for-ipo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19702640/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/04/general-motors-issues-forecast-for-ipo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>general motors</category><category>GM</category><category>government</category><category>government motors</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Case-Shiller Index Adds Bearish Momentum to the Market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/26/case-shiller-home-price-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/26/case-shiller-home-price-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/26/case-shiller-home-price-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/housesale240.jpg" alt="home prices" />Tuesday morning started off on a bearish note, which intensified after the latest news release from the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller home price index. The index reported that home prices <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-stock-futures-slide-further-after-case-shiller-data-2010-10-26" target="_blank">dropped 0.2% during August</a>, which brought an end to four straight months of gains.</p>
<p>The Case-Shiller home price index was termed "disappointing" by those compiling the data. In 15 of the 20 metropolitan areas tracked by the index, home prices dropped compared to July. In addition, the data showed that annualized price growth slowed to 1.7% from July's 3.2%. The only cities that showed an increase in home prices were Chicago, Detroit, Las Vegas, New York and Washington D.C.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/26/case-shiller-home-price-index/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Case-Shiller Index Adds Bearish Momentum to the Market</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/26/case-shiller-home-price-index/">Case-Shiller Index Adds Bearish Momentum to the Market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/26/case-shiller-home-price-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19689623/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/26/case-shiller-home-price-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Case Shiller</category><category>Case Shiller Home Price Index</category><category>government</category><category>Home sales</category><category>rebates</category><category>tax credit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IMF Forecasts a Slowdown in U.S. Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/imf-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />This is not good news. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) did an assessment of growth for the U.S. economy and forecasts lower growth this year and next, according to a report in <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6952MR20101006">Reuters</a>.</p>
<p>For the year 2010 the IMF reduced U.S. growth estimate from 3.3% down to 2.6%. For 2011 they also lowered growth from 2.9% to 2.3%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>IMF Forecasts a Slowdown in U.S. Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/">IMF Forecasts a Slowdown in U.S. Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6952MR20101006>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19663231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/imf-forecasts-a-slowdown-in-us-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>government</category><category>IMF Assessment of the US economy</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Government Criticized for AIG Bailout]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/aig-bailout-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/aig-bailout-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/aig-bailout-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="AIG logo" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/aig-logo-240x160.jpg" />According to the Congressional Oversight Panel's <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/panel-criticizes-government-on-aig/1083389/">newest report</a> (due for release today), the government may haved jumped the gun a bit when bailing out American International Group (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>).</p>
<p>The panel cannot be sure that the U.S. taxpayers will every be fully repaid the $182 billion given to the troubled insurer. In fact, the panel believes that the government should have explored other options before bailing out AIG.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/aig-bailout-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Government Criticized for AIG Bailout</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/aig-bailout-report/">Government Criticized for AIG Bailout</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/aig-bailout-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19510913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/10/aig-bailout-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>government</category><category>government bailout</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Public Trust in U.S. Government Rises and Falls with the Economy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/public-trust-in-u-s-government-rise-and-falls-with-the-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/public-trust-in-u-s-government-rise-and-falls-with-the-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/public-trust-in-u-s-government-rise-and-falls-with-the-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/522006_crowd.jpg" alt="" />The Atlantic</em> monthly <a href="http:// http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/04/80-percent-of-americans-dont-trust-the-government-heres-why/39148/">has published</a> updated Pew Research Center survey data on public trust in government, and the contemporary trend mirrors much of the pattern for the modern era since 1960. According to the research, Americans' trust in the their government tends to rise when the economy is doing well and fall during recessions. <br />
<br />
A couple of caveats: Trust took a big hit amid the tumultuous late-1960s/early-1970s period, when the divisive <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War">Vietnam War</a> occurred and the nation dealt with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate">Watergate</a> political scandal of the Nixon administration. From a high above 75% in the early/mid 1960s, trust in government fell below 50% during this time period.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/public-trust-in-u-s-government-rise-and-falls-with-the-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Public Trust in U.S. Government Rises and Falls with the Economy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/public-trust-in-u-s-government-rise-and-falls-with-the-economy/">Public Trust in U.S. Government Rises and Falls with the Economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/public-trust-in-u-s-government-rise-and-falls-with-the-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19445491/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/public-trust-in-u-s-government-rise-and-falls-with-the-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>government</category><category>recession</category><category>trust</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China Is a Bigger Worry Than Greece]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/chineseflag.jpg" alt="" />The stock market has been fretting about the European Union's response to the economic calamity in Greece. That certainly is worthy of note as I have been doing the same lately, see: <a target="_blank" title="View Greek Debt Exposes European DisUnion on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/23/greek-debt-exposes-european-disunion/">Greek Debt Exposes European DisUnion</a>. However, Greece is not the economic titan that China is.<br />
<br />
China is a much larger concern to me because it can rock our world big-time!<br />
<br />
As Google Inc (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has experienced, along with other companies and the entire citizenry of China, they like their secrets, their silence, and their control. What they do not like is transparency, unfettered freedom, and distribution of information, and I doubt, your shareholder rights.<br />
<br />
"Who is watching the store?"<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>China Is a Bigger Worry Than Greece</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/">China Is a Bigger Worry Than Greece</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19415616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/07/china-is-a-bigger-worry-than-greece/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>China</category><category>disclosure</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>government</category><category>Greece</category><category>shareholder rights</category><category>ShareholderValue</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Government Gave Bank Regulators Millions in Bonuses During Financial Meltdown]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/fdic-logo-240.jpg" />During the 2003 -- 06 boom years, three agencies, The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BONUSES_FOR_REGULATORS?SITE=RIPRJ&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">gave out millions of dollars</a> in bonuses to regulators of these agencies.</p>
<p>The bonuses were supposedly given out for "superior" performance. Records show that at least $19 million in bonuses was awarded.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Government Gave Bank Regulators Millions in Bonuses During Financial Meltdown</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/">Government Gave Bank Regulators Millions in Bonuses During Financial Meltdown</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BONUSES_FOR_REGULATORS?SITE=RIPRJ&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406905/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/government-gave-bank-regulators-millions-in-bonuses-during-finan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonuses</category><category>FDIC</category><category>financial industry</category><category>government</category><category>inthenews</category><category>office of the comptroller of the currency</category><category>Office of Thrift Supervision</category><category>regulators</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ADP Jobs Data Shows Private Sector Lost Jobs in February]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/adp-jobs-data-shows-private-sector-lost-jobs-in-february/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/adp-jobs-data-shows-private-sector-lost-jobs-in-february/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/adp-jobs-data-shows-private-sector-lost-jobs-in-february/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/adp-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Earlier Wednesday morning, Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas reported that U.S. job cuts <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/before-the-bell-futures-decline-slightly-after-jobs-data/" target="_blank">dropped in February to the lowest level in 3.5 years</a>. This slowing continues the trend of shrinking job cuts since last January. Later, ADP reported what was expected: the private sector <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/private-sector-sheds-20000-jobs-adp-says-2010-03-03?dist=beforebell" target="_blank">cut 20,000 jobs during February</a>. This loss was the lowest since 22,000 jobs were added in January 2008.</p>
<p>My guess is that we will not hear anything <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/02/we-are-to-ignore-february-jobless-numbers-because-of-snow/">about the snow</a> in this report akin to Tuesday's warning from the government. In fact, I'm guessing that we will hear that this report came in as expected and that "the recovery" is still on track.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/adp-jobs-data-shows-private-sector-lost-jobs-in-february/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ADP Jobs Data Shows Private Sector Lost Jobs in February</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/adp-jobs-data-shows-private-sector-lost-jobs-in-february/">ADP Jobs Data Shows Private Sector Lost Jobs in February</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/adp-jobs-data-shows-private-sector-lost-jobs-in-february/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19381207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/adp-jobs-data-shows-private-sector-lost-jobs-in-february/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>ADP Jobs</category><category>featured</category><category>government</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Has Elkhart, Indiana Come to Symbolize Federal Housing Failure?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/has-elkhart-indiana-come-to-symbolize-federal-housing-failure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/has-elkhart-indiana-come-to-symbolize-federal-housing-failure/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/has-elkhart-indiana-come-to-symbolize-federal-housing-failure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosurestory.jpg" />Elkhart, Indiana; a favorite stomping ground of President Obama - where the government's economic stimulus plan was to be on full display, helping the town rise like a phoenix from the ashes. According to this <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/business/15housing.html?ref=business" target="_blank">article</a>, Elkhart has gained jobs in the past nine months, but the federal support for housing is failing. More than one in 10 mortgages in Elkhart is "seriously behind" on payments and the median sale price of homes is back to where it was 10 years ago. One of the main goals of the federal support program was to keep prices from falling and mortgage delinquencies from rising, and how is that working out? Elkhart residents note that the only reason their real estate market works at all is because of the emergency federal funding. In fact, in the past 18 months, the FHA upped loans in Elkhart by 40% while defaults increased 174% --- not a good ratio.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/has-elkhart-indiana-come-to-symbolize-federal-housing-failure/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Has Elkhart, Indiana Come to Symbolize Federal Housing Failure?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/has-elkhart-indiana-come-to-symbolize-federal-housing-failure/">Has Elkhart, Indiana Come to Symbolize Federal Housing Failure?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/has-elkhart-indiana-come-to-symbolize-federal-housing-failure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19358490/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/has-elkhart-indiana-come-to-symbolize-federal-housing-failure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>elkhart</category><category>federal housing administration</category><category>FederalHousingAdministration</category><category>government</category><category>housing bubble</category><category>HousingBubble</category><category>indiana</category><category>obama</category><category>tarp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEO departures slow down, temporarily at least]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/banalities-briefcase.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />CEO turnover is starting to stabilize, suggesting that recession-impacted companies have been through the worst of the corner-office shuffling. The number of top dogs leaving their posts by November 2009 fell almost 18% compared to the same 11 months last year, according to a report supplied to BloggingStocks by outplacement consulting firm <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>. Only 94 CEOs left their posts last month, a slight up-tick from October's 89, but 10% lower than the 104 recorded in November 2008.
<p>Through the end of November, 1,122 CEOs have moved on, a decline of 17.6% year-over-year. Last year, 1,361 departures were seen by this point. If the trend continues, CEO turnover could reach its lowest level since 2004, when only 663 occurred.</p>
<p>The health care industry experienced the most changes, with 22 CEOs leaving their posts, bringing the total to 181 for the sector this year, topping all industries. The government and non-profit sector comes next with 148 this year, 18 in November. The financial services industry lost 116 CEOs, with only 10 happening last month.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CEO departures slow down, temporarily at least</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/">CEO departures slow down, temporarily at least</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19272731/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/ceo-departures-slow-down-temporarily-at-least/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>ceos</category><category>challenger</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>Chief Executive</category><category>ChiefExecutiveOfficer</category><category>ChiefExecutives</category><category>employment</category><category>financial services</category><category>government</category><category>healthcare</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nonprofits</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AIG moves two life insurers, suggests a liquidity event]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/aig-moves-two-life-insurers-suggests-a-liquidity-event/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/aig-moves-two-life-insurers-suggests-a-liquidity-event/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/aig-moves-two-life-insurers-suggests-a-liquidity-event/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/aig-200x150.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />American International Group (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys" target="_blank">AIG</a>) <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/insurance/2009-12-01-aig-25b_N.htm" target="_blank">trimmed its tab to the American people by $25 billion on Tuesday</a>. The insurance company, plagued by fallout from the financial crisis for more than a year, moved two subsidiaries -- American International Assurance and American Life Insurance -- into special units that are used to separate a business from its parent company. A spinoff or sale is the next logical step.</p>
<p>For now, AIG is holding on to the companies and giving the U.S. government preferred equity in the two life insurers. When AIG decides to send the companies public or divest via a private transaction, the feds (and taxpayers) will be able to cash in. Before becoming too optimistic, keep in mind that a timetable hasn't been set.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/aig-moves-two-life-insurers-suggests-a-liquidity-event/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AIG moves two life insurers, suggests a liquidity event</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/aig-moves-two-life-insurers-suggests-a-liquidity-event/">AIG moves two life insurers, suggests a liquidity event</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/insurance/2009-12-01-aig-25b_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/aig-moves-two-life-insurers-suggests-a-liquidity-event/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261068/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/aig-moves-two-life-insurers-suggests-a-liquidity-event/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>American International</category><category>american international group</category><category>American life insurance</category><category>AmericanInternational</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>AmericanLifeInsurance</category><category>Asia</category><category>government</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Life Insurance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Labor-less Day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/labor-less-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/labor-less-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/labor-less-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/labor.jpg" alt="" />Last Friday the market reacted favorably (or less negatively) to the latest report from the Labor Department's unemployment figures of 9.7 percent in August, as employers cut 216,000 jobs last month. The percentage is up but the raw numbers are trending down allowing for a sigh of relief on Wall Street with the major indices all up over 1%.<br /><br />Many would argue that when it comes to the truth, the government is prone to favor aesthetic figures <font>instead </font>o<font>f the straight data. I tend t</font>o agree with this view as the numbers appear sculpted to be the least offensive.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/labor-less-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Labor-less Day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/labor-less-day/">Labor-less Day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/labor-less-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19151191/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/labor-less-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>construction</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>government</category><category>jobs</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More trouble for Rio Tinto in China]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/more-trouble-for-rio-tinto-in-china/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/more-trouble-for-rio-tinto-in-china/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/more-trouble-for-rio-tinto-in-china/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtp/" rel="tag">Rio Tinto plc ADS (RIO)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/rio-tinto.jpg" />Early this morning, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rio-tinto-plc-ads/rtp/nys">Rio Tinto</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rio-tinto-plc-ads/rtp/nys">RTP</a>) found itself facing new allegations in the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/08/10/news/international/china_rio/index.htm?postversion=2009081004">arrest of some of its employees in China</a>. RTP is accused of overcharging Chinese steel mills by $100 million during the past six years, and the latest accusations cover the sale of iron ore. <br /><br />To catch you up on the situation between RTP and the Chinese government, back in early July, RTP was accused of bribing officials and four of its employees were detained by authorities in Shanghai on suspicion of stealing state secrets. The allegations contended that the four employees bribed executives from 16 of China's major steel mills in order to obtain industry information. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/more-trouble-for-rio-tinto-in-china/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More trouble for Rio Tinto in China</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/more-trouble-for-rio-tinto-in-china/">More trouble for Rio Tinto in China</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/more-trouble-for-rio-tinto-in-china/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19124319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/more-trouble-for-rio-tinto-in-china/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>chinalco</category><category>editorial</category><category>editorial claims</category><category>EditorialClaims</category><category>featured</category><category>government</category><category>government controversy</category><category>GovernmentControversy</category><category>Rio Tinto</category><category>RioTinto</category><category>RTP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumers: Income &amp; savings up -- Gov't worried]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/consumers-income-and-savings-up-govt-worried/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/consumers-income-and-savings-up-govt-worried/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/consumers-income-and-savings-up-govt-worried/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/benjamin-franklin.jpg" />We live in amazing times. Consumers are earning more; at least the ones with jobs. <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/may-incomes-surge-but-savings-outpace/541749">They are also saving more than they have in the last 15 years.</a> <em>The <a href="http://money.aol.com/market-news">savings rate</a>, which was hovering near zero in early 2008, surged to <strong>6.9 percent</strong>, the highest level since December 1993</em>. I think that is fantastic!<br /><br />Ben Franklin said, "A penny saved is a penny earned". If that is true, then people are improving their economic condition day by day. Strange as it might seem, the government is troubled by this.<br /><br />The government and many economists are worried that without greater spending by consumers any economic recovery will be stalled that much further. During our recent manic economy, over the past decade, consumer spending was responsible for about 70% of the GDP.<br /><br />I say to all my readers, let others spend -- YOU KEEP SAVING -- and reducing debt. You will be glad you did. The consumer led economy was a false economy. The world is mourning the sudden death of Michael Jackson who passed away yesterday from yet to be determined causes leading to cardiac arrest, reportedly $400 million in debt. You think he was under any stress?!<br /><em><span class="symbol"><em></em></span><em></em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/consumers-income-and-savings-up-govt-worried/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumers: Income &amp; savings up -- Gov't worried</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/consumers-income-and-savings-up-govt-worried/">Consumers: Income &amp; savings up -- Gov't worried</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/consumers-income-and-savings-up-govt-worried/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19079573/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/consumers-income-and-savings-up-govt-worried/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BenjaminFranklin</category><category>Consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>debt</category><category>featured</category><category>government</category><category>Michael Jackson</category><category>MichaelJackson</category><category>savings rate</category><category>SavingsRate</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford, Nissan and Tesla may receive U.S. auto loans]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/ford-nissan-and-tesla-may-receive-u-s-auto-loans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/ford-nissan-and-tesla-may-receive-u-s-auto-loans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/ford-nissan-and-tesla-may-receive-u-s-auto-loans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nsany/" rel="tag">Nissan Motors (NSANY)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/autoplant.jpg" alt="" />The Energy Department is <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/ap-source-ford-nissan-tesla-to-get-govt/538097">set to lend money</a> to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>), Tesla, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nissan-motor-co-ltd-american-depositary-shares-exempt-pursuant-to-12g3-2-b/nsany/nas">Nissan</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nissan-motor-co-ltd-american-depositary-shares-exempt-pursuant-to-12g3-2-b/nsany/nas">NSANY</a>), according to the Associated Press. The report cites anonymous sources, with the official announcement set for today in Dearborn, Michigan. <br /><br />Reportedly, Ford has asked to receive $5 billion in loans by 2011, although the sources were not certain on how much money the automaker would receive. Nissan's requested amount was undisclosed and Tesla has reportedly asked for $450 million. The loan program the automakers are trying to tap into was approved by Congress last year in order to help car companies and suppliers develop green vehicles and components (such as the advanced battery) and help automakers meet the new fuel-efficiency standards of 35 miles per gallon by 2020.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/ford-nissan-and-tesla-may-receive-u-s-auto-loans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford, Nissan and Tesla may receive U.S. auto loans</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/ford-nissan-and-tesla-may-receive-u-s-auto-loans/">Ford, Nissan and Tesla may receive U.S. auto loans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/ford-nissan-and-tesla-may-receive-u-s-auto-loans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19075287/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/ford-nissan-and-tesla-may-receive-u-s-auto-loans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>automaker loans</category><category>AutomakerLoans</category><category>automakers</category><category>efficiency standards</category><category>EfficiencyStandards</category><category>f</category><category>ford</category><category>fuel efficiency</category><category>FuelEfficiency</category><category>government</category><category>government standards</category><category>GovernmentStandards</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nissan</category><category>nsany</category><category>tesla</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America says it was pressured into Merrill Lynch deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/bank-of-america-says-it-was-pressured-into-merrill-lynch-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/bank-of-america-says-it-was-pressured-into-merrill-lynch-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/bank-of-america-says-it-was-pressured-into-merrill-lynch-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bac-bank-of-america-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) CEO Ken Lewis threatened to use a "material adverse change" (MAC) clause to kill the agreement to buy Merrill Lynch because he wanted to get a <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3fb98672-5614-11de-ab7e-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1">lower price</a>, according to the <em>Financial Times</em>. New e-mails reveal how he was then pressured to proceed with the deal. <br /><br />A House committee on oversight and government reform is investigating whether or not undue pressure was put on Lewis in order to complete the deal to purchase Merrill Lynch. Reportedly, the Federal Reserve would not comply with the committee's request for documentation and e-mails regarding the accusations, but the committee issued a subpoena to the central bank on Tuesday. Lewis is set to testify about the matter today at a congressional hearing.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/bank-of-america-says-it-was-pressured-into-merrill-lynch-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank of America says it was pressured into Merrill Lynch deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/bank-of-america-says-it-was-pressured-into-merrill-lynch-deal/">Bank of America says it was pressured into Merrill Lynch deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/bank-of-america-says-it-was-pressured-into-merrill-lynch-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19064249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/bank-of-america-says-it-was-pressured-into-merrill-lynch-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accusations</category><category>BAC</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>government</category><category>government control</category><category>GovernmentControl</category><category>Henry Paulson</category><category>HenryPaulson</category><category>Ken Lewis</category><category>KenLewis</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup starts its stock swap ... finally]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/citigrouppic.jpg" />This morning, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/citi-begins-58-billion-stock-swap/521538">began its $58-billion stock swap</a>, a move that could leave the government with a 34% stake in the bank. The country's third-largest bank plans to swap common stock for (up to) $33 billion in preferred shares and convert as much as $25 billion of preferred shares held by the U.S. Treasury into common stock. <br /><br />The bank believes that the swap could (emphasis on could here) make Citigroup one of the world's best-capitalized banks. The action could add up to $61 billion of tangible common equity and $64 billion of Tier-1 common equity. Citigroup had planned to take this action back in April.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup starts its stock swap ... finally</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/">Citigroup starts its stock swap ... finally</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19063099/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/10/citigroup-starts-its-stock-swap-finally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>government</category><category>government bailout</category><category>GovernmentBailout</category><category>inthenews</category><category>stock swap</category><category>StockSwap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[US: The world's cleanest third world country]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/apc/" rel="tag">Anadarko Petroleum (APC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/rsz_anadarko.jpg" alt="" />Last night it was <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idAFLD24221320090413?rpc=33">reported by Reuters</a>, following up on an interview in the Financial Times (subscription required) that James Hackett, chairman and chief executive of independent oil and gas company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anadarko-petroleum-corporation/apc/nys">Anadarko Petroleum</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anadarko-petroleum-corporation/apc/nys">APC</a>) said, "Washington's energy and environmental policy risks plunging the United States into an economic tailspin that could make it <em><strong>the world's cleanest third world country</strong></em>."<span id="midArticle_byline"></span></p>
<span id="midArticle_0"></span>
<p>Seems he is not partial to the global warming crowd as indicated by his statement that <em>"The histrionic and maniacal focus on carbon dioxide is intellectually repugnant to me,"</em> but how does he really feel?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>US: The world's cleanest third world country</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/">US: The world's cleanest third world country</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1516389/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/us-the-worlds-cleanest-third-world-country/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Anadarko Petroleum</category><category>AnadarkoPetroleum</category><category>APC</category><category>cap and trade</category><category>CapAndTrade</category><category>featured</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>government</category><category>government regulation</category><category>GovernmentRegulation</category><category>James Hackett</category><category>JamesHackett</category><category>profits</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock picks 2009</category><category>StockPicks2009</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup and Morgan Stanley may add to bank shenanigans]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/c-citigroup-logo.jpg" />Yesterday, there was outrage about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) and the bonus payments the firm said it is legally bound to make. Today, it is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) that are looking for new ways to anger the rest of America. <br /><br /><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" /><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> is reporting that officials at both troubled banks are looking into <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123724826580949187.html">ways to circumvent federal caps on bonuses</a>. Reportedly, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, along with "other financial institutions that got government aid," are negotiating to raise base salaries for some executives and "other top-producing employees." Remember, the bonus caps were part of the recent stimulus package that President Obama okayed last month.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup and Morgan Stanley may add to bank shenanigans</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/">Citigroup and Morgan Stanley may add to bank shenanigans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1490309/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>government</category><category>inthenews</category><category>poor business decisions</category><category>PoorBusinessDecisions</category><category>questionable payments</category><category>QuestionablePayments</category><category>tarp</category><category>tarp money</category><category>TarpMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seven reasons the market is not going up any time soon: #7 The government is gasping for air]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/hold-7-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-7-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/hold-7-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-7-t/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/hold-7-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-7-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/red-white-blue.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Yes, Uncle Sam is going to continue buying stuff and stimulizing (a new word for the new economy) with money it prints. And -- getting back to pure Yogisms -- it ain't gonna work.</p>
<p>The net decline in wealth -- including the stock market, housing, private equity, etc. -- plus the withdrawal of credit now totals $415 trillion or more. You think $700 billion for concrete and a fat guy holding a "Go Slow" sign is going to help?</p>
<p>Roosevelt calmed people by spending a fortune in and on the Works Progress Administration (WPA) -- great buildings and better murals, but not a lot of long-term economic impact. </p>
<p>We are a bit too advanced for that kind of na&iuml;ve reaction. Not to mention the government is going to need many more trillions to fix the financial system. </p>
<p>And that's the rub -- even Uncle Sam cannot help too much, long term, as the world kicks its addiction to excess credit. And with that goes a big drop in fundamental demand, from the United States to China.</p>
<p><em>Be sure to read <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/your-stock-market-nightmare-isnt-over-7-reasons-the-market-is/">all 7 reasons </a>the stock market isn't going up any time soon.</em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/expert-traders/optionszone-experts/michael-shulman.html">Michael Shulman</a> is a contributor to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/obama-seven-trades.html">OptionsZone.com</a>.</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/hold-7-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-7-t/">Seven reasons the market is not going up any time soon: #7 The government is gasping for air</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/hold-7-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-7-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1437987/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/hold-7-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-7-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>government</category><category>government bail out</category><category>government bailout</category><category>government bailouts</category><category>GovernmentBailout</category><category>GovernmentBailouts</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>MichaelShulman</category><category>stock market nightmare</category><category>StockMarketNightmare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
