<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA['House of Cards' Signals New Motivations for Netflix]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/house-of-cards-signals-new-motivations-for-netflix/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/house-of-cards-signals-new-motivations-for-netflix/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/house-of-cards-signals-new-motivations-for-netflix/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/07/netflix.jpg" alt="Netflix" />Netflix (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>), which has established a strong foothold in the online streaming business, is now looking to bid for exclusive rights to original content. Currently, the arena of online movie sales and rental is dominated by services like Apple's (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) iTunes, Netflix, Amazon.com (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>), Hulu etc. Our price estimate for Netflix stands at $119 -- significantly below the current market price, which is above $200.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/house-of-cards-signals-new-motivations-for-netflix/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'House of Cards' Signals New Motivations for Netflix</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/house-of-cards-signals-new-motivations-for-netflix/">'House of Cards' Signals New Motivations for Netflix</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/house-of-cards-signals-new-motivations-for-netflix/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19894038/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/29/house-of-cards-signals-new-motivations-for-netflix/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Featured</category><category>HBO</category><category>House of Cards</category><category>netflix</category><category>Netflix original content</category><category>NFLX</category><category>original content</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>Twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trefis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Exploit Your Employer for Big Returns (with Video)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/exploit-your-employer-for-big-returns/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/exploit-your-employer-for-big-returns/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/exploit-your-employer-for-big-returns/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/jamesaltucher-smiling-1287414549.jpg" />Say you have $20,000 to $100,000 to invest. You can put it in stocks, hope to make a 10% return over time, and if the market moves up, you could walk away with an extra $2,000 to $10,000 before taxes. Or, you could take that same investment, and put it into something that could generate far greater returns.</p>
<p>James Altucher, Managing Director of Formula Capital, says that a better way to reap big returns is to exploit your employer. (See video.)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/exploit-your-employer-for-big-returns/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Exploit Your Employer for Big Returns (with Video)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/exploit-your-employer-for-big-returns/">Exploit Your Employer for Big Returns (with Video)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/exploit-your-employer-for-big-returns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19678377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/18/exploit-your-employer-for-big-returns/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>entrepreneur</category><category>exploit your employer</category><category>featured</category><category>formula capital</category><category>hbo</category><category>investing</category><category>james altucher</category><category>reset</category><category>start your own company</category><category>video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikhil Hutheesing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix: How Does the Stock Look Now?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/07/netflix-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/07/netflix-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/07/netflix-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/netflix-logo-240.jpg" />I wrote about Netflix (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) back in April. At the time, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/22/netflix-had-a-great-quarter-but-be-cautious-about-stock/">I was very cautious</a> about the stock's prospects. It turned out I was a little too cautious. The stock has risen since my piece was published from about $87 to yesterday's closing price of over $107. Very impressive action. <br />
<br />
But the stock was even higher not long ago. The 52-week high on the shares is $127.96. When you look at the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/netflix-inc/nflx/nas/tech-chart">one-year chart</a>, and the recent dip experienced by the equity, you begin to wonder: is this a buying opportunity? After all, the movie-rental company continues to focus on its pursuit of producing a comprehensive, shareholder-value-increasing digital strategy.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/07/netflix-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix: How Does the Stock Look Now?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/07/netflix-stock/">Netflix: How Does the Stock Look Now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2010/07/netflix-challenging-hbo-showtime-as-it-signs-distribution-deal-with-relativity-media.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/07/netflix-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19544373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/07/netflix-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>featured</category><category>HBO</category><category>inthenews</category><category>movie rentals</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>showtime</category><category>time warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE's Universal says no to Spielberg; Disney may say yes? Really?!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/spielberg_gov_photo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />I'll tell you, I find this such amazingly telling news. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures apparently does not want to distribute a DreamWorks slate anymore. </p>
<p>According to <em><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3if08da6d1db7f9cb4ab17c7dde089c999">The Hollywood Reporter</a></em>, changes that DreamWorks wanted to make to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/ge-and-steven-spielberg-a-dream-come-true/">previous deal</a> that was already hammered out did not pass muster with Universal execs. In a statement, Universal commented that such changes no longer fit the movie studio's business plan. You'll recall that Steven Spielberg and his DreamWorks company left the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) fold recently in pursuit of fresh funding and a new distribution partner to start life anew.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE's Universal says no to Spielberg; Disney may say yes? Really?!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/">GE's Universal says no to Spielberg; Disney may say yes? Really?!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1452867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bob iger</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dreamworks</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>HBO</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HBO and Apple singing the same iTune?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/hbo-and-apple-singing-the-same-itune/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/hbo-and-apple-singing-the-same-itune/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/hbo-and-apple-singing-the-same-itune/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/hbologo.jpg" />Is there any content company <em>not </em>interested in dealing with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) iTunes platform? According to <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/05/12/Apple-and-HBO-Close-to-a-Deal">Portfolio.com</a>, media conglomerate <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) would like to see its HBO programming distributed on Apple's best-of-breed digital service. An announcement of a deal could be forthcoming very soon.</p>
<p>While some many question the move since HBO is a premium subscription service and could conceivably lose some of its allure, I think it is smart strategy. Digital distribution isn't going away, and HBO needs to be part of every platform, even iTunes. Plus, imagine the possibilities to really cash in here. What if the finale of<em> The Sopranos</em> had been sold on iTunes before it aired? Little experiments like this would not only be valuable in terms of testing contemporary theories about distribution paradigms in the 21st century, but they might also be profitable.</p>
<p> Perhaps the key element of this story is that it seems as if Time Warner was able to convince Apple that its content is worth more than the typical iTunes price point of $1.99. This is important because price elasticity will ultimately determine the overall value of a content library. Apple would, of course, like to charge the bare minimum to the users of its hardware, but where does that leave an HBO? No, HBO would be smart in starting as high as possible in terms of price and then adjusting after a full analysis. </p>
<p>I look forward to seeing this agreement announced, and if it is, I think HBO will not only make some money with Apple, but it will find that the pay-cable channel's brand equity will be boosted in the bargain. Some iTune users might actually be prompted to subscribe. HBO is known as a home for quality programs -- I loved the old <em>Tales From the Crypt </em>series -- and it may soon be known as an iTunes top seller.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own shares in any company mentioned here; positions can change at any time.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/hbo-and-apple-singing-the-same-itune/">HBO and Apple singing the same iTune?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 May 2008 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/05/12/Apple-and-HBO-Close-to-a-Deal>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/hbo-and-apple-singing-the-same-itune/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1193585/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/13/hbo-and-apple-singing-the-same-itune/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>cable industry</category><category>CableIndustry</category><category>HBO</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iTunes</category><category>Tales From the Crypt</category><category>TalesFromTheCrypt</category><category>The Sopranos</category><category>TheSopranos</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blockbuster (BBI) wants part of new Viacom (VIA) pay channel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/blockbuster-bbi-wants-part-of-new-viacom-via-pay-channel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/blockbuster-bbi-wants-part-of-new-viacom-via-pay-channel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/blockbuster-bbi-wants-part-of-new-viacom-via-pay-channel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cc/" rel="tag">Circuit City Stores (CC)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/bbilogo.jpg" />Blockbuster</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>) must want to own a piece of everything. First, it made a bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/circuit-city-stores-inc/cc/nys">Circuit City</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/circuit-city-stores-inc/cc/nys">CC</a>) and now it is trying to get a piece of the new pay TV channel being launched by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>). </p>
<p>Viacom says it will start a TV network with movies and other video content with contributions from MGM and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">Lions Gate</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>). The channel will compete with HBO and Showtime.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120943876851351887.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "As part of a deal being discussed, Blockbuster would get digital rights to the new channel's programming in return for an investment in the partnership."</p>
<p>How that makes sense is a mystery. The Viacom channel can sell DVDs though a number of outlets. Streaming content over the internet does not require help from Blockbuster. How does a company with rental stores and a DVD-by-Internet operation help a pay TV channel which will be distributed by satellite and cable?</p>
<p>Blockbuster has problems of its own. For starters, it just needs to stay in business. Its stock trades at $2.98, near a 52-week low, and down from more than $20 less than five years ago. Putting capital into new ventures or nutty M&amp;A transactions is a waste of shareholder money.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and author of the <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/10_stocks_under_10_dollars_newsletter.html">Ten Stocks Under $10 Letter.</a> </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/blockbuster-bbi-wants-part-of-new-viacom-via-pay-channel/">Blockbuster (BBI) wants part of new Viacom (VIA) pay channel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120943876851351887.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/blockbuster-bbi-wants-part-of-new-viacom-via-pay-channel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1180427/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/29/blockbuster-bbi-wants-part-of-new-viacom-via-pay-channel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>CC</category><category>HBO</category><category>LFG</category><category>Showtime</category><category>VIA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS's Showtime to get competition]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/cbs-cbs-showtime-to-get-competition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/cbs-cbs-showtime-to-get-competition/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/cbs-cbs-showtime-to-get-competition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/tvpicture.jpg" alt="" />Viacom's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>) Paramount studio, MGM, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">Lionsgate</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>) want their own pay TV channel. That means Viacom will cut ties with Showtime, owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>). MGM and Lionsgate will also break with the CBS property. The deal is more interesting since Sumner Redstone is chairman of both CBS and Viacom.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/business/media/21viacom.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">According to</a> <em>The New York Times, "</em>The deal raises the question of how Showtime will fill the feature film portion of its programming slate. Showtime pays more than $100 million a year to the studios to show their movies."</p>
<p>The new channel could end up ruining Showtime, hurting the CBS financials, and setting up new competition for HBO, but it is a sign of the times. Studios are seeing more and more premium video going to the internet. Some of that content is pirated. It is a cinch the new channel will be a better economic deal for the studios involved. They need the money.</p>
<p>The $100 million budget film used to be unusual. Now it seems to be the norm. Studios which cannot bring in more revenue though new distribution deals may see their P&amp;L's falter, so they are aggressively changing their revenue models, even if it means cutting the throats of old friends.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/cbs-cbs-showtime-to-get-competition/">CBS's Showtime to get competition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/business/media/21viacom.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/cbs-cbs-showtime-to-get-competition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1173003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/cbs-cbs-showtime-to-get-competition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>HBO</category><category>lgf</category><category>Showtime</category><category>VIA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell: Futures lower ahead of Bernanke testimony]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/before-the-bell-futures-lower-ahead-of-bernanke-testimony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/before-the-bell-futures-lower-ahead-of-bernanke-testimony/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/before-the-bell-futures-lower-ahead-of-bernanke-testimony/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tol/" rel="tag">Toll Brothers (TOL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" />Stock futures were lower this morning, indicating a similar start on Wall Street as a day of profit taking seems to be ahead to snap-up a three-day winning streak. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke heading to congress today to discuss the economy while the dollar reached a new against the euro and several other currencies.<br /><br />On Tuesday, stocks rallied despite some weak data on the housing sector, inflation and consumer confidence. Instead, a $<a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-02-26T191206Z_01_WNAS2437_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-IBM-BUYBACK-DC.XML">15 billion stock buy-back</a> plan from International Business Machines (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) triggered a surge in the markets with the Dow industrials rising 114 points, or 0.91%, the S&amp;P 500 gaining 9 points, or 0.69% and the Nasdaq Composite rising 17 points or 0.75%. IBM finished the day up 3.91%.<br /><br />Data today includes, January durable-goods orders, which is expected to have declined 4%, to be released at 8:30 a.m. EST. At 10:00 a.m., new-home sales for January will be reported, again expected to show a decline.<br /><br />At 10:00 a.m., also, all eyes will be on Fed chief Bernanke as he <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/fed-chief-assessing-economys-health/n20080227033809990009">gives Congress a fresh assessment</a> of the country's economic health when he testifies before the House Financial Services Committee. Of course, the economy has been hurt by a correction in the housing sector, a credit crunch and soaring energy prices. Many would be interested in the balancing act of stimulating the economy while trying to keep somewhat of a lid on the already higher inflation as evidenced from yesterday's PPI report (being just the latest data). If today's weakening dollar is any indication, then investors, at least, expect the Fed to keep on cutting rates.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/before-the-bell-futures-lower-ahead-of-bernanke-testimony/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the bell: Futures lower ahead of Bernanke testimony</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/before-the-bell-futures-lower-ahead-of-bernanke-testimony/">Before the bell: Futures lower ahead of Bernanke testimony</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/before-the-bell-futures-lower-ahead-of-bernanke-testimony/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1125812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/27/before-the-bell-futures-lower-ahead-of-bernanke-testimony/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>hbo</category><category>ibm</category><category>msft</category><category>tol</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HBO: Internet killed the cable star]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/hbo-internet-killed-the-cable-star/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/hbo-internet-killed-the-cable-star/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/hbo-internet-killed-the-cable-star/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/hbo.jpg" alt="" />It's hard to believe that - not long ago - cable television was a cutting-edge thing. Hey, didn't kids once say: "I want my MTV"?</p>
<p>Now, of course, the new-new thing is online video, especially with the extreme popularity of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)'s YouTube. </p>
<p>Interestingly enough, we are seeing some movement from the cable players trying to figure out what to do about the broadband revolution (seems kind of late, huh?).</p>
<p>HBO is now making some <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2008/tc20080121_113325.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_technology">moves</a>. But, there are some limitations. If you are a subscriber (in certain markets), you can access shows online, though it requires a software download (which means there are pretty tight digital-rights management controls). </p>
<p>Despite all this, it does seem like a good start.</p>
<p>I had a chance to interview Chase Norlin, the CEO of <a href="http://www.pixsy.com ">Pixsy</a>, an online video search company. According to him:<br /><br />"This is a logical move for HBO to utilize their programming as a customer acquisition and retention tool in conjunction with the large MSOs (multiple service operators). Web-based multimedia content becomes another negotiable point between the content owners/producers and the cable operators/distributors. An additional benefit for HBO is the online ad monetization of their content. Expect to see more content owners/producers follow this trend." </p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including </em><a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><em><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and </em><a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><em><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />. He also operates <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com">DealProfiles.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/hbo-internet-killed-the-cable-star/">HBO: Internet killed the cable star</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/hbo-internet-killed-the-cable-star/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1094661/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/23/hbo-internet-killed-the-cable-star/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HBO</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HBO goes PC VOD]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/hbo-goes-pc-vod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/hbo-goes-pc-vod/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/hbo-goes-pc-vod/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) movie network HBO will begin testing an online video service. The new project would allow network subscribers to watch programming on their PCs or download them to watch later. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120088406665704159.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>HBO is starting a trial of the service, called HBO Broadband, in Green Bay, Wis., the network says, and could roll it out more widely later this year."</p>
<p>While HBO's brand is well-known among cable subscribers, it is difficult to predict whether this will translate into a large audience online. The amount of premium content available over the internet is growing rapidly as companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) enter the industry. In a field this crowded, newer competitors may have trouble finding audiences.</p>
<p>HBO does have one distinct advantage. Many of the programs on the network are produced for its viewers and are not available elsewhere. This large amount of original content may draw a substantial audience for the new distribution channel.</p>
<p>But the field is getting crowded.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em><em> </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/hbo-goes-pc-vod/">HBO goes PC VOD</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120088406665704159.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/hbo-goes-pc-vod/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1092024/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/21/hbo-goes-pc-vod/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HBO</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>online video</category><category>OnlineVideo</category><category>TWX</category><category>video on demand</category><category>VideoOnDemand</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ten dumbest CEO moves of 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/ten-dumbest-ceo-moves-of-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/ten-dumbest-ceo-moves-of-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/ten-dumbest-ceo-moves-of-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfmi/" rel="tag">Whole Foods Market (WFMI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p>Portfolio.com featured its picks for the <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2007/12/21/Ten-Dumbest-CEO-Moves-of-2007">ten dumbest moves by CEOs in 2007</a>. The list shows a nice range and depth of stupidity on the part of CEOs -- and it hasn't gone unnoticed that there are no women on this list of dummies. Here are their picks and my two cents:</p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
    <li>John Mackey, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas">Whole Foods Market</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas">WFMI</a>) -- He displayed his brilliance by posting on message boards under the screen name Rahodeb, hyping Whole Foods while not letting people know exactly who it was that was hyping the company. (Seems reminiscent of Patrick Byrne of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/overstock-com-inc-del/ostk/nas">Overstock.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/overstock-com-inc-del/ostk/nas">OSTK</a>).) The company ended up <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/whole-foods-bans-executives-from-message-boards/">banning executives from participating on any message boards</a>. </li>
    <li>Paul Wolfowitz, World Bank -- Getting his girlfriend at the bank a transfer and a raise. Need we say more? </li>
    <li>Steve Jobs, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc-com-npv/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc-com-npv/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) -- Ticking off early adopters by slashing $200 off the original price of the $600 iPhone shortly after its debut. Nothing like causing your loyal customers to think twice before they run right out to be the first to buy Apple's <span style="font-weight: bold;">next </span>new gadget. </li>
    <li>Chris Albrecht, HBO -- An alleged assault of his girlfriend in Las Vegas ended in his arrest. And then came the news that he did something similar in the early 1990s. Not the kind of headlines you want from your CEO. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/ten-dumbest-ceo-moves-of-2007/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ten dumbest CEO moves of 2007</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/ten-dumbest-ceo-moves-of-2007/">Ten dumbest CEO moves of 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/ten-dumbest-ceo-moves-of-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1070796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/ten-dumbest-ceo-moves-of-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>BP</category><category>BRCD</category><category>BSC</category><category>BX</category><category>HBO</category><category>JBLU</category><category>OSTK</category><category>Portfolio.com</category><category>WFMI</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy Coenen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HBO to turn Barry Bonds scandal into a movie]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/hbo-to-turn-barry-bonds-scandal-into-a-movie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/hbo-to-turn-barry-bonds-scandal-into-a-movie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/hbo-to-turn-barry-bonds-scandal-into-a-movie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img height="300" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/shadowscover.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" /><em>Game of Shadows</em>, the controversial bestseller that brought to light detailed allegations of home run king Barry Bonds' involvement with illegal performance-enhancing drugs, is being made into a movie by HBO.<br /><br />Just when Barry Bonds, who recently indicted by a grand jury, thought the negative publicity couldn't get any worse: a made-for-TV movie.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/30/sports/baseball/30bonds.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">According</a> to the <em>New York Times</em> "Much of the book was based on secret grand jury testimony of Bonds and other athletes leaked to Williams and Fainaru-Wada by Troy Ellerman, a lawyer sentenced to two and a half years in prison for denying under oath he was the reporters' source... The book recounts that Bonds allegedly began using steroids in 1999 after becoming jealous of Mark McGwire's having set baseball's single-season home run record the previous season."<br /><br />This should be a pretty interesting movie. Remember, Bonds has not been convicted of any crime. And while I'm hardly a fan of Barry Bonds, making a movie based on grand jury testimony that was illicitly leaked to 2 reporters seems unfair. If he ends up being convicted, I would say go for it to the idea of a movie. But it seems premature. After all, even athletes are innocent until proven guilty.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/hbo-to-turn-barry-bonds-scandal-into-a-movie/">HBO to turn Barry Bonds scandal into a movie</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/30/sports/baseball/30bonds.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/hbo-to-turn-barry-bonds-scandal-into-a-movie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1052045/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/hbo-to-turn-barry-bonds-scandal-into-a-movie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barry Bonds</category><category>HBO</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[HBO subscriptions increase after 'Sopranos' finale]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/hbo-subscriptions-increase-after-sopranos-finale/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/hbo-subscriptions-increase-after-sopranos-finale/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/hbo-subscriptions-increase-after-sopranos-finale/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img height="248" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/soprano.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Some good news has emerged for premium cable network HBO, a unit of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>). During the past few years, the channel's high-profile losses of <em>Sex and the City</em>, <em>Six Feet Under</em>, and finally, <em>The Sopranos </em>raised speculation that HBO could be struggling for new hits and new subscribers. <br /><br />But according to the latest subscription figures, the number of HBO faithful has <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/televisionNews/idUSN2533120620071125" target="_blank">actually risen slightly</a> in the first full quarter since Tony Soprano and his families <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/attempted-whacking-of-hbo-website/" target="_blank">faded to black</a> in June. The new data shows that HBO's subscriber base rose by 80,000 in its third quarter to 28.94 million, an increase of 0.3%. Monthly subscription fees make up the vast majority of HBO's total revenue, which is expected to hit $3.7 billion this year. <br /><br />SNL Kagan analyst Deana Myers told <em>Reuters</em>: "It seemed like a lot of people said they were going to cancel HBO after <em>Sopranos</em> ended ... it did seem like it was going to go down." Perhaps the amusing <em>Entourage </em>or the darkly comic <em>Curb Your Enthusiasm </em>have expanding fan bases? Or maybe people hold on to their premium channels for the sports and movie offerings? It could be that folks are just too lazy to call their cable providers. Either way, it's a nice nugget of surprising news for HBO and TWX. Now if we can just work on that writers' strike ... <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a></em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/hbo-subscriptions-increase-after-sopranos-finale/">HBO subscriptions increase after 'Sopranos' finale</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/televisionNews/idUSN2533120620071125>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/hbo-subscriptions-increase-after-sopranos-finale/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1049320/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/27/hbo-subscriptions-increase-after-sopranos-finale/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Curb Your Enthusiasm</category><category>CurbYourEnthusiasm</category><category>Entourage</category><category>HBO</category><category>television</category><category>The Sopranos</category><category>TheSopranos</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Sex and the City' movie to begin shooting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/sex-and-the-city-movie-to-begin-shooting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/sex-and-the-city-movie-to-begin-shooting/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/sex-and-the-city-movie-to-begin-shooting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img height="214" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/satc.jpg" width="180" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />After years of speculation, rumors and negotiations, a film version of beloved HBO series <em>Sex and the City </em>is set to <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288165,00.html" target="_blank">start shooting in the fall</a>. <br /><br />New Line Cinema, a subsidiary of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), is said to be near a deal to finance and distribute the picture, and the leading cast is ready to go. All four major players -- <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/girls-just-wanna-have-fashion-sarah-jessica-parker-launches-clo/">Sarah Jessica Parker</a>, the reportedly hardball-playing Kim Cattrall, Kristin Davis, and Cynthia Nixon -- have agreed to reprise their respective roles as Carrie, Samantha, Charlotte, and Miranda. The show's executive producer, Michael Patrick King, is set to write and direct. <br /><br />When television audiences bid adieu to the ladies in early 2004, things were fairly neatly knotted up (spoiler alert!). Carrie's character had reunited with on-again, off-again love "Mr. Big" (aka "John," as we find out). Samantha was cancer-free and in a healthy relationship with a much younger man; Charlotte and new husband Harry were looking forward to adopting a baby girl; and newlywed Miranda was raising her son with husband Steve and caring for his ailing mother. <br /><br />One can only speculate where the movie will take the ladies. Will it pick up in real-time, three years after the events of the series finale? Will the foursome's leading men also be back in their roles? Finally, will anyone still care to see 90 minutes into these ladies' lives, now that they are all settled down and monogamous? Michael Patrick King is a fantastic writer of dramedy, and the actresses are a fabulous ensemble. Here's hoping the cosmopolitans continue to flow for one more chapter of their collective tale. <br /><br /><em><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/sex-and-the-city-movie-to-begin-shooting/">'Sex and the City' movie to begin shooting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288165,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/sex-and-the-city-movie-to-begin-shooting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/933695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/sex-and-the-city-movie-to-begin-shooting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cynthia Nixon</category><category>CynthiaNixon</category><category>HBO</category><category>Kim Cattrall</category><category>KimCattrall</category><category>Kristin Davis</category><category>KristinDavis</category><category>New Line Cinema</category><category>NewLineCinema</category><category>Sarah Jessica Parker</category><category>SarahJessicaParker</category><category>Sex and the City</category><category>SexAndTheCity</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's time for Time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a> ) has been selected as the "undervalued stock of the month" by <strong>Paul Tracy</strong>, in his <a href="http://www.streetauthority.com">StreetAuthority Market Advisor</a>.</p>
<p>The advisor explains, "We think the company's days as an industry laggard are over and we think the company is well-positioned to leverage its valuable assets and unlock shareholder value in the years ahead." </p>
<p>For those unfamiliar with the company's operations, he explains that Time Warner is the largest media conglomerate on the planet. First, he notes, there is AOL, which has built a powerful network of highly-trafficked web sites. He explains, "Its ubiquitous instant messenger service is used to send 1.8 billion messages every day." </p>
<p>Then, he adds, there is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Cable Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWC</a>), which has grown to become the nation's number two cable provider with a massive base of 15 million customers -- roughly half of whom have signed up for premium services such as digital video or high-speed internet. </p>
<p>The film business, he points out, includes Warner Brothers and New Line Cinema, and has "raked in billions" in global box office revenues from blockbuster hits like Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings. </p>
<p>In fact, he says, Warner Brothers is planning to bring the Harry Potter world to life, unveiling plans to collaborate on a new theme park based on the "wildly popular" series. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's time for Time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/">It's time for Time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/933795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>cnn</category><category>harry potter</category><category>hbo</category><category>lord of the rings</category><category>media conglomerates</category><category>media stocks</category><category>new line cinema</category><category>NewLineCinema</category><category>paul tracy</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>streetauthority market advisor</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tnt</category><category>twx</category><category>warner brothers</category><category>warner home video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Sopranos' yard sale: same junk as any other yard sale in Jersey]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/sopranos-yard-sale-same-junk-as-any-other-yard-sale-in-jersey/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/sopranos-yard-sale-same-junk-as-any-other-yard-sale-in-jersey/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/sopranos-yard-sale-same-junk-as-any-other-yard-sale-in-jersey/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="117" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/sopranos.jpg" />For those die-hard <em>Sopranos </em>fans that aren't still <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/attempted-whacking-of-hbo-website/">up in arms</a> about last week's controversial season finale, you can enjoy the luxurious experience of heading to a warehouse in Queens to scoop up paraphernalia from the popular show's set. Furniture, rugs, lamps, books, and other items that decorated the Jersey-based sets will be available for purchase, but sources close to the show say the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/2007/06/19/2007-06-19_sopranos_sale__dont_mind_the_bloodstains.html" target="_blank">more "iconic" items won't be up for grabs</a>. <br /><br />What one defines as "iconic" is anybody's guess, but a <em>Daily News </em>reporter surmises that you probably won't be able to nab Tony's ubiquitous bathrobe or the soiled bowling-ball bag that once hid Ralphie's severed noggin. Paulie's velour track suits? One can only hope. <br /><br />The sale kicked off Tuesday morning and will run through Monday. <br /><br />As for the future of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>)'s HBO network, rumors of a rush of cancellations have been running rampant, but there have yet to be any hard figures released. I'm willing to bet that many such threats were idle, and while HBO subscriptions might see a modest drop off with <em>The Sopranos </em>bidding <em>arrivederci</em>, plenty of viewers will remain loyal, due to laziness, tradition, loyalty, a desire to catch the big boxing matches when they air, or a deep admiration of <em>Big Love's </em>Bill Paxton. Well, the first four reasons are valid, at least...<br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/sopranos-yard-sale-same-junk-as-any-other-yard-sale-in-jersey/">'Sopranos' yard sale: same junk as any other yard sale in Jersey</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/2007/06/19/2007-06-19_sopranos_sale__dont_mind_the_bloodstains.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/sopranos-yard-sale-same-junk-as-any-other-yard-sale-in-jersey/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/921895/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/sopranos-yard-sale-same-junk-as-any-other-yard-sale-in-jersey/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auctions</category><category>HBO</category><category>Sopranos</category><category>TWX</category><category>yard sales</category><category>YardSales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NBA Finals see lagging ratings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/nba-finals-see-lagging-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/nba-finals-see-lagging-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/nba-finals-see-lagging-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img height="186" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/cavaliers---mike-brown.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Even the majesty that is LeBron James couldn't trump Tony Soprano. Game 2 of the NBA finals, which aired on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ABC Network, saw a drop in ratings as the San Antonio Spurs won 103-92, going up two games to none against the James-led Cleveland Cavaliers. <br /><br />Early numbers revealed that the game posted an overnight rating of 6.9 on the network, drawing <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/nba/2007-06-12-finals-ratings_N.htm" target="_blank">5.6% of U.S. TV households</a>. This represents a 24% drop from the previous year's 9.1 rating for Game 2 of the Dallas Mavericks/Miami Heat series. NBA officials cited <em>The Sopranos </em>season finale for a large reason why folks weren't tuning in to catch some hoops. Available in 30 million households, the HBO show drew 11.9 million viewers; the game attracted 8.5 million viewers during the same hour-long time slot.<br /><br />But <em>The Sopranos </em>finale was just one hour on one night. Maybe the sagging ratings are because both San Antonio and Cleveland are relatively small markets (number 37 and 17, respectively)? Or perhaps in the post-Jordan era, people just don't care as much about professional basketball? <br /><br />According to <em>USA Today</em>, ESPN's NBA playoff broadcasts this season averaged 2.4% of cable TV households - on par with the rock-bottom numbers of 2003 - while ABC says its regular-season games (up to the finals) have seen ratings drop 40% from 2003 levels. <br /><br />To maintain a fleeting hope that this year's finals won't set an all-time ratings low, ABC needs the series to go 6 or even 7 games. With the Cavs now down three games to none, that's a severely unlikely possibility. <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/nba-finals-see-lagging-ratings/">NBA Finals see lagging ratings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/nba/2007-06-12-finals-ratings_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/nba-finals-see-lagging-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/917059/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/13/nba-finals-see-lagging-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>basketball</category><category>Cleveland Cavaliers</category><category>ClevelandCavaliers</category><category>DIS</category><category>ESPN</category><category>HBO</category><category>NBA</category><category>San Antonia Spurs</category><category>SanAntoniaSpurs</category><category>television ratings</category><category>TelevisionRatings</category><category>The Sopranos</category><category>TheSopranos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Attempted whacking of HBO website]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/attempted-whacking-of-hbo-website/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/attempted-whacking-of-hbo-website/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/attempted-whacking-of-hbo-website/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img height="198" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/gandolfini.jpg" width="160" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Penning the series finale to a beloved show is a thankless job. A program's resolution is never quite good enough, and always leaves fans feeling disappointed, cheated, or flat-out angry (one notable exception, in my opinion, was the final offering of <em>Newhart</em>). Creator/writer of <em>The Sopranos</em>, David Chase, apparently couldn't please his rabid army of fans hungry for a fitting end to their favorite Mob family. <br /><br />After the final curtain was drawn yesterday evening on the sixth and final season of the beloved series, angry fans began to stalk the HBO website. Countless letters of strongly-worded outrage at the show's less-than-fulfilling outcome (I won't post any spoilers here) ultimately <a href="http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/thats-what-we-were-waiting-for-angry-fans-crash-hbo-website/">crashed the site</a> of the cable network, which is a unit of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>). <br /><br /><em>The Sopranos</em>, which centers on the life of Tony Soprano (the inimitable James Gandolfini) as he balances his home life with his responsibilities as a high-ranking official in the world of organized crime, is the final of HBO's cash cows to bid adieu. While <em>Entourage </em>and <em>Big Love </em>are critically acclaimed, they do not attract the ratings of <em>Sopranos </em>(or former success story <em>Sex and the City)</em>. <br /><br />The <em>Sopranos </em>finale evidently angered so many viewers that some analysts are predicting a rapid spike in cancellations of the premium service, which costs about $10 to $15 each month, depending on your cable provider.<br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/attempted-whacking-of-hbo-website/">Attempted whacking of HBO website</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/thats-what-we-were-waiting-for-angry-fans-crash-hbo-website/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/attempted-whacking-of-hbo-website/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/915591/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/attempted-whacking-of-hbo-website/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable television</category><category>CableTelevision</category><category>David Chase</category><category>DavidChase</category><category>HBO</category><category>series finale</category><category>SeriesFinale</category><category>The Sopranos</category><category>TheSopranos</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner opts not to whack future Sopranos potential]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/time-warner-decides-open-end-to-sopranos-is-best-business-model/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/time-warner-decides-open-end-to-sopranos-is-best-business-model/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/time-warner-decides-open-end-to-sopranos-is-best-business-model/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/tony_soprano_final_240.jpg" />Time Warner Inc</a>. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) decided the most obvious business strategy is the best business strategy: <em>keep opportunities for a franchise open!</em> After endless speculation about the fate of Tony Soprano, the series ended with the patriarch eating dinner with his family. <br /><br />Phil Leotardo did get whacked after a partial betrayal in his own ranks with Tony Soprano's men tracking him down (with help of a small FBI tip), but you knew that Time Warner wasn't going for a new mob series called "The Leotardo's." But the show did end obliquely. Tony Soprano was left alive, although either an assassin or an FBI agent headed into the bathroom and two more unknown characters ominously entered the front of the building.<br /><br />What is obvious is that even with an open ending, Tony's life is still in disarray and he is an easy target, even after winning the war with his enemy. His attorney said one of his old crew was turning state's evidence and there was an 80% or 90% chance of a federal indictment over an old gun charged lumped with a RICO case. Regardless, Time Warner made the savvy choice: Don't whack potential future profits. "THE END" isn't really ever the end if there is enough money at stake.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/time-warner-decides-open-end-to-sopranos-is-best-business-model/">Time Warner opts not to whack future Sopranos potential</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/time-warner-decides-open-end-to-sopranos-is-best-business-model/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/915149/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/11/time-warner-decides-open-end-to-sopranos-is-best-business-model/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HBO</category><category>Tony Soprano</category><category>TonySoprano</category><category>TWC</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sopranos finale no worry for Time Warner; Even Cramer thinks 'Fuggedaboudit!']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/sopranos-finale-no-worry-for-time-warner-even-cramer-thinks-fu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/sopranos-finale-no-worry-for-time-warner-even-cramer-thinks-fu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/sopranos-finale-no-worry-for-time-warner-even-cramer-thinks-fu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p>The media keeps talking about <em>The Sopranos</em> ending plus all of the wild predictions about who lives and who dies. There was a piece <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/06/financial-implications-of-tony-sopranos-final-fate/">here Wednesday</a> discussing that <a href="http://www.bodoglife.com/sports-betting/tv-film-movie-props.jsp">Bodog.com was hosting odds</a> on the fate of Tony Soprano himself and the rest of crew. This has been discussed as something that could either potentially impact <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) because it owns HBO, and ultimately that it could impact <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys">Time Warber Cable</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys">TWC</a>). Tying a major media conglomerate to one single show is like listening to the doomsday predictors: Maybe they'll be right one day, but they have been wrong every other time up to now.<br /><br />Jim Cramer was just discussing this on CNBC a little while ago where he threw out the notion that <em>The</em> <em>Sopranos</em> coming to an end would put pressure on the company. He reminded us about how when <em>The Sopranos</em> went on a hiatus that it had no impact on real subscriber rates. Cramer further noted how Time Warner has been buying back stock and how well Parsons has been running the company. It should also be remembered that HBO has been a leader, and other cable and TV networks end up copying its success. <br /><br />So you can go to Bodog to <a href="http://www.bodog.com/sports-betting/tv-film-movie-props.jsp">check the odds</a> on Tony Soprano's ultimate fate, for entertainment only since U.S. citizens are crimped by Puritans making online gambling immoral and illegal. The betting money that has made it so far is giving Soprano himself a slim chance of survival, but if you believe in the "follow the money trail" you'd wonder why they would put a total and complete end to future "cameo episodes" or something of the like.<br /><em><br />Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/sopranos-finale-no-worry-for-time-warner-even-cramer-thinks-fu/">Sopranos finale no worry for Time Warner; Even Cramer thinks 'Fuggedaboudit!'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/sopranos-finale-no-worry-for-time-warner-even-cramer-thinks-fu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/914004/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/sopranos-finale-no-worry-for-time-warner-even-cramer-thinks-fu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HBO</category><category>Tony Soprano</category><category>TonySoprano</category><category>TWC</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:42:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
