<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[UnitedHealth Group Trading Lower After Earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/unitedhealth-group-trading-lower-after-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/unitedhealth-group-trading-lower-after-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/unitedhealth-group-trading-lower-after-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/01/unitedhealthgrouplogo.jpg"  alt="" />UnitedHealth Group's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/unitedhealth-group-incorporated/unh/nys">UNH</a>) stock is a little sick today. The shares are exchanging hands at a quote of $40.07 as of this writing, a price that represents a drop in value of 1.2%. Volume is active. <br />
<p>
If you look at the latest earnings report, however, you can't help but shake your head in wonderment. The <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/unitedhealths-4q-profit-rises-10-percent/992051/">Associated Press</a> says that adjusted Q4 net income of $1.05 per share beat the overall projection of 84 cents per share. Quite a difference. Furthermore, the company is sticking to its outlook for 2011.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/unitedhealth-group-trading-lower-after-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UnitedHealth Group Trading Lower After Earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/unitedhealth-group-trading-lower-after-earnings/">UnitedHealth Group Trading Lower After Earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/unitedhealths-4q-profit-rises-10-percent/992051/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/unitedhealth-group-trading-lower-after-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19808818/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/unitedhealth-group-trading-lower-after-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>health care</category><category>inthenews</category><category>UNH</category><category>unitedhealth group</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Johnson &amp; Johnson Sets Sites on Crucell: What Would This Mean for Stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/johnson-and-johnson-sets-sites-on-crucell/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/johnson-and-johnson-sets-sites-on-crucell/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/johnson-and-johnson-sets-sites-on-crucell/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/jnj-logo.jpg" />Early Friday, American health care giant Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys" target="_blank">JNJ</a>) announced that it is in "advanced talks" to acquire <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/johnson-and-johnson-plans-to-buy-crucell/1278294/" target="_blank">Dutch biotech firm Crucell NV</a>. According to the report, the deal (which would help strengthen JNJ's vaccine business) is going to cost $2.29 billion. JNJ already owns a 17.9% stake in Crucell and will be offering &euro;24.75 in cash for the remaining 82%. The offer price represents a 58% premium from Crucell's Thursday close. <br />
<br />
In a joint statement, the companies noted expectations for "Crucell's strength in the manufacture, discovery and commercialization of vaccines would create a strong platform for Johnson &amp; Johnson in the vaccine market." According to the Associated Press, JNJ has roughly $64 billion in annual sales and is the "world's biggest and most broadly based health care company."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/johnson-and-johnson-sets-sites-on-crucell/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Johnson &amp; Johnson Sets Sites on Crucell: What Would This Mean for Stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/johnson-and-johnson-sets-sites-on-crucell/">Johnson &amp; Johnson Sets Sites on Crucell: What Would This Mean for Stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/johnson-and-johnson-sets-sites-on-crucell/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19637769/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/johnson-and-johnson-sets-sites-on-crucell/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisition</category><category>Crucell</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Looking to Play Defense? Buy Pfizer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/pfe-logo-240.jpg" />Pfizer Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) reported a blowout second quarter this morning prior to the opening bell. Net income attributable to the company increased to $2.475 billion compared to $2.261 billion in the year-ago quarter. On an adjusted basis, quarterly earnings were $4.959 billion, or $0.62 per share, versus $3.249 billion or $0.48 per share, in last year's corresponding quarter. This compared to Wall Street analysts' consensus EPS estimates of $0.52.<br />
<br />
Revenues were up 58% to $17.327 billion which came in way ahead of analysts' estimates of $16.65 billion. The company also reaffirmed its 2010 EPS guidance of $2.10 to $2.20 and said it expects earnings to come in at the higher end of that range. Using these metrics, PFE looks ridiculously cheap (and has been for sometime). The stock has been a favorite of value investors such as David Einhorn because of its blue-chip brand, inexpensive valuation, fat dividend yield, and defensive business profile.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Looking to Play Defense? Buy Pfizer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/">Looking to Play Defense? Buy Pfizer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19579677/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/looking-to-play-defense-buy-pfizer-pfe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drugs</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>healthcare</category><category>inthenews</category><category>long trading</category><category>PFE</category><category>pfizer</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Raznick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Schlumberger's First-Quarter Earnings Drop]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/schlumbergers-first-quarter-earnings-drop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/schlumbergers-first-quarter-earnings-drop/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/schlumbergers-first-quarter-earnings-drop/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/slb/" rel="tag">Schlumberger Limited (SLB)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/slb-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Schlumberger Ltd. (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/schlumberger-ltd-netherlands-antilles/slb/nys">SLB</a>), early on Firday morning, revealed that its <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/schlumberger-1st-quarter-profit-falls-28/444534/">first-quarter profit fell 28%</a>. The oil company attributed the decline in earnings to a revenue drop of nearly 7% and to charges related to healthcare reform. SLB earned 56 cents per share in the latest first quarter, down from 78 cents per share a year ago, and five cents short of the consensus estimate. <br />
<br />
Revenue fell to $5.6 billion, a drop of 6.7%, and nearly equal to expectations of $5.69 billion. Nevertheless, the company maintained that evidence shows that higher oil prices will lead to increased drilling activity by international customers -- a turnaround from the past two years, which were impacted by the declining demand for oil.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/schlumbergers-first-quarter-earnings-drop/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Schlumberger's First-Quarter Earnings Drop</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/schlumbergers-first-quarter-earnings-drop/">Schlumberger's First-Quarter Earnings Drop</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/schlumbergers-first-quarter-earnings-drop/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19451711/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/schlumbergers-first-quarter-earnings-drop/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>health care</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil exploration</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Entrepreneur's Journal: What the Obama Health Care Bill Means to Your Business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/04/entrepreneurs-journal-what-the-obama-health-care-bill-means-to/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/04/entrepreneurs-journal-what-the-obama-health-care-bill-means-to/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/04/entrepreneurs-journal-what-the-obama-health-care-bill-means-to/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/white-house-logo.jpg" alt="" />Despite the heated politics, business owners need to have an understanding of President Obama's $940 billion <a href="http://www.taulli.com/the-tax-bite-from-obama-care">health care plan</a>. So, I've talked with various experts on the matter.</p>
<p>And while things are far from set, there are some general things to consider.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/04/entrepreneurs-journal-what-the-obama-health-care-bill-means-to/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entrepreneur's Journal: What the Obama Health Care Bill Means to Your Business</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/04/entrepreneurs-journal-what-the-obama-health-care-bill-means-to/">Entrepreneur's Journal: What the Obama Health Care Bill Means to Your Business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 04 Apr 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/04/entrepreneurs-journal-what-the-obama-health-care-bill-means-to/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19422932/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/04/entrepreneurs-journal-what-the-obama-health-care-bill-means-to/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cadillac insurance</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>health insurance</category><category>Health-care bill</category><category>INTU</category><category>Medicaid</category><category>Sam Gibbs</category><category>SHOP exchanges</category><category>tax credits</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Insurance Mess, Ebix to the Rescue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/chasing-value-insurance-mess-ebix-to-the-rescue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/chasing-value-insurance-mess-ebix-to-the-rescue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/chasing-value-insurance-mess-ebix-to-the-rescue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebix/" rel="tag">Ebix Inc. (EBIX)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/ebixlogo.jpg" />It has been a long time since I have suggested investors dabble in tech stocks, unless, like me, you consider Intuitive Surgical (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/intuitive-surgical-inc/isrg/nas">ISRG</a>) a tech stock. Today, that changes as I direct your attention to the rapidly growing small cap stock Ebix (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ebix-inc/ebix/nas">EBIX</a>), a software company that specializes in the needs of the insurance industry.<br /> <br /> This Atlanta, GA-based company is up 113.30% in the last year, 450.72% over three years, and an incredible 1,092.74% in five years<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ebix-inc/ebix/nas/historical-prices"> through March 2010</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/chasing-value-insurance-mess-ebix-to-the-rescue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Insurance Mess, Ebix to the Rescue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/chasing-value-insurance-mess-ebix-to-the-rescue/">Chasing Value: Insurance Mess, Ebix to the Rescue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/chasing-value-insurance-mess-ebix-to-the-rescue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19413916/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/chasing-value-insurance-mess-ebix-to-the-rescue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chasing value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>cheap stocks</category><category>CheapStocks</category><category>EBIX</category><category>featured</category><category>growth stocks</category><category>GrowthStocks</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>insurance software</category><category>InsuranceSoftware</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>small cap stocks</category><category>SmallCapStocks</category><category>value stocks</category><category>ValueStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[House Passes Health Care Bill by 219-212 Vote]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/house-passes-health-care-bill-by-219-212-vote/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/house-passes-health-care-bill-by-219-212-vote/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/house-passes-health-care-bill-by-219-212-vote/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/stethoscope.jpg" alt="" />After a year of debate, the health care bill finally was passed in the House of Representatives <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1abaa5a6-350f-11df-9cfb-00144feabdc0.html">by a vote of 219 to 212.</a></p>
<p>Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, led the delicate maneuvering to garner the votes needed for passage of the $940 billion, 10-year bill.</p>
<p>The final votes hinged on Representative Bart Stupak (D-Mich). He and his colleagues initially objected to the language on abortion which they felt was not clear enough. President Obama told Stupak that he would issue an executive order spelling out in clear language that federal health care monies would not be used for elective abortions. That brought Stupak and his group on board and clinched the final tally.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/house-passes-health-care-bill-by-219-212-vote/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>House Passes Health Care Bill by 219-212 Vote</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/house-passes-health-care-bill-by-219-212-vote/">House Passes Health Care Bill by 219-212 Vote</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1abaa5a6-350f-11df-9cfb-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/house-passes-health-care-bill-by-219-212-vote/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19408541/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/house-passes-health-care-bill-by-219-212-vote/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>health care bill</category><category>inthenews</category><category>obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whole Foods to Levy Tubby Tax]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/whole-foods-to-levy-tubby-tax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/whole-foods-to-levy-tubby-tax/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/whole-foods-to-levy-tubby-tax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfmi/" rel="tag">Whole Foods Market (WFMI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/wfmi-whole-foods-market-logo.jpg" />Eating less is being rewarded in a strange new way. Thinner employees at Whole Foods (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas" target="_blank">WFMI</a>) will enjoy deeper discounts on food, leading to an even wider disparity relative to the ... ummmm ... "bigger-boned" employees. A <a href="http://www.dnainfo.com/20100127/manhattan/whole-foods-health-plan-rewards-slimmer-workers">new employee rewards program</a> called "Health Starts Here" offers employees discounts based on body mass index. Hit the gym, go for a jog or simply enjoy the perks of a naturally buzzing metabolism, and you can save a fortune. Carry around a little extra heft, and you'll pay more to maintain it. <br />
<br />
At present, every Whole Foods employee receives a 20% discount on purchases in the store. By sweating to the oldies, however, they can take that discount to 30%. But dieting like a model won't work: nicotine use is a disqualifier. So, if you're trying to smoke your way to svelte, find another way.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/whole-foods-to-levy-tubby-tax/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whole Foods to Levy Tubby Tax</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/whole-foods-to-levy-tubby-tax/">Whole Foods to Levy Tubby Tax</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dnainfo.com/20100127/manhattan/whole-foods-health-plan-rewards-slimmer-workers>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/whole-foods-to-levy-tubby-tax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19333507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/whole-foods-to-levy-tubby-tax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fat</category><category>fat tax</category><category>FatTax</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>wfmi</category><category>whole foods</category><category>WholeFoods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five Ways CEO Turnover Changed in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/cash-wad.jpg" />For CEOs, 2009 was a return to stability, according to the latest study from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>. CEO turnover fell to its lowest level in five years, a sharp turn from the record highs experienced the year before.<br />
<br />
"The 17 percent drop in CEO turnover this year may be due partly to efforts by some companies to try to keep top management stable until the status of the economy became clearer. The economy may have turned a corner around mid-year, but it is still in a fragile state, which helped maintain this stability through the second half of 2009," said John Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Five Ways CEO Turnover Changed in 2009</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/">Five Ways CEO Turnover Changed in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19316555/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/14/five-ways-ceo-turnover-changed-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CVS, Walgreen: Pull-Backs Are Buy Opportunities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/walgreens-logo-240.jpg" />I'm reiterating my buy ratings the nation's two premier drug store chains: CVS Caremark (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>), first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/cvs-knows-that-a-doctors-handwriting-is-a-code-for-earnings/">on February 16, 2009</a>, at a price of $27.30; and Walgreen (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/walgreen-wag-expands-the-old-fashioned-way-carefully/">on February 17, 2009</a>, at a price of $25.46. If you bought CVS in February, you're up 25%; WAG, up about 40%.</p>
<p>As expected, each has performed well on increased store traffic stemming from the H1N1 flu virus (trips to purchase hand sanitizers, other disinfecting items, and flu symptom comforts), which has offset reduced traffic for other drug store trips, due to the U.S. recession.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CVS, Walgreen: Pull-Backs Are Buy Opportunities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/">CVS, Walgreen: Pull-Backs Are Buy Opportunities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19301113/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>H1N1</category><category>health care</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Health Insurers Get Brief Relief on Proposed Tax]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsx/" rel="tag">Boston Scientific (BSX)</a></p><p>Insurance companies just bought themselves a year. Claiming that a proposed tax on health insurance would force them to charge higher premiums, carriers were able to convince senators to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=asyq1HrjE1LY&amp;pos=2">defer this particular measure</a> for a year. <br /><br />This comes as a benefit to UnitedHealth Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/unitedhealth-group-incorporated/unh/nys" target="_blank">UNH</a>), WellPoint (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wellpoint-inc/wlp/nys" target="_blank">WLP</a>) and smaller companies writing health insurance policies. Manufacturers of medical devices have won some relief, as well, though the drug business didn't. An earlier plan to tax cosmetic medical procedures was also scrapped.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Health Insurers Get Brief Relief on Proposed Tax</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/">Health Insurers Get Brief Relief on Proposed Tax</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=asyq1HrjE1LY&amp;pos=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19288675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/21/health-insurers-get-brief-relief-on-proposed-tax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boston scientific</category><category>BSX</category><category>drugs</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GS</category><category>health care</category><category>health insurance</category><category>insurance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mdt</category><category>medical devices</category><category>Medtronic</category><category>pfe</category><category>pfizer</category><category>UNH</category><category>UnitedHealth</category><category>Wellpoint</category><category>WLP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Study: Employers would cut health benefits to avoid excise tax ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/study-employers-would-cut-health-benefits-to-avoid-excise-tax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/study-employers-would-cut-health-benefits-to-avoid-excise-tax/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/study-employers-would-cut-health-benefits-to-avoid-excise-tax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/05/hmoppo_200mw_mf030906.jpg" />If the Senate's proposed <a href="http://dpc.senate.gov/dpcdoc-sen_health_care_bill.cfm" target="_blank">Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</a> passes the Senate, the working   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/health/Study_Says_63_of_Employers_Will_Cut_Health_Benefits'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  stiff will probably be affected. A study by <a href="http://www.mercer.com" target="_blank">Mercer</a> finds that 63% of employers would <a href="http://www.lifeandhealthinsurancenews.com/News/2009/12/Pages/Firms-Could-Cut-Health-Care-To-Skirt-Tax-Study-.aspx" target="_blank">cut the health benefits they offer in order to avoid an excise tax</a> included in the bill.</p>
<p>Mercer, a division of Marsh &amp; McLennan Companies (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marsh-and-mclennan-companies-inc/mmc/nys" target="_blank">MMC</a>), reveals that 25% of employers offer health <a href="http://www.gadling.com/tag/insurance/">insurance</a> programs that would be "too generous" under the act, making them subject to a 40% nondeductible tax on the excess value.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/study-employers-would-cut-health-benefits-to-avoid-excise-tax/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Study: Employers would cut health benefits to avoid excise tax </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/study-employers-would-cut-health-benefits-to-avoid-excise-tax/">Study: Employers would cut health benefits to avoid excise tax </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/study-employers-would-cut-health-benefits-to-avoid-excise-tax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19267140/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/study-employers-would-cut-health-benefits-to-avoid-excise-tax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>health care</category><category>health insurance</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>marsh and mclennan</category><category>mercer</category><category>MMC</category><category>Senate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer on BloggingStocks: Obama moves away from health care reform ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obama-moves-away-from-health-care-refo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obama-moves-away-from-health-care-refo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obama-moves-away-from-health-care-refo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jim-cramer/" rel="tag">Cramer on BloggingStocks</a></p><div id="thestreet_module"> <img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/jimcramer-profile.jpg" alt="" />
<div>
<h3>From <a href="http://www.thestreet.com">TheStreet.com</a> Network</h3>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10636033/1/black-fridays-revenge-will-sales-slip.html?puc=aoljjc">Black Friday's Revenge: Will Sales Slip? </a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10634925/1/trading-tax-you-got-a-better-idea.html?puc=aoljjc">Trading Tax: You Got a Better Idea? </a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<span style="font-style: italic;">TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says last night he talked Afghanistan. Next week climate change. What happened to health care reform? </span><br /><br />  When was the last time President Obama ever talked about health care? Last night it was Afghanistan. He just came back from a state trip to Asia. Next it is climate in Denmark.  <br /><br />  Meanwhile, the clock is ticking. There just aren't enough days left this year to get health care done and Senator Harry Reid's clock management might be as bad as Philadelphia Eagles coach Andy Reid's clock management -- maybe worse. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obama-moves-away-from-health-care-refo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer on BloggingStocks: Obama moves away from health care reform </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obama-moves-away-from-health-care-refo/">Cramer on BloggingStocks: Obama moves away from health care reform </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obama-moves-away-from-health-care-refo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cramer-on-bloggingstocks-obama-moves-away-from-health-care-refo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[United States on verge of historic Senate debate on health care]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/united-states-on-verge-of-historic-senate-debate-on-health-care/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/united-states-on-verge-of-historic-senate-debate-on-health-care/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/united-states-on-verge-of-historic-senate-debate-on-health-care/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" />Any experienced investor knows that these are not normal times. But they could become truly historic times, if the United States is able to pass universal health care legislation in the the weeks ahead. <br /><br />Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, has crafted a health care bill that would cut the U.S. budget deficit by about $130 billion over 10 years, while extending coverage to up to 94% of Americans, The Associated Press <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teddy_Roosevelt">reported Thursday</a>. The bill's estimate cost is $848 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/united-states-on-verge-of-historic-senate-debate-on-health-care/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>United States on verge of historic Senate debate on health care</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/united-states-on-verge-of-historic-senate-debate-on-health-care/">United States on verge of historic Senate debate on health care</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/united-states-on-verge-of-historic-senate-debate-on-health-care/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19246561/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/19/united-states-on-verge-of-historic-senate-debate-on-health-care/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harry Reid</category><category>HarryReid</category><category>health care</category><category>healthcare</category><category>inthenews</category><category>US Senate</category><category>UsSenate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reid eyeing 0.4%-0.5% Medicare payroll tax hike for health care reform]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/logo_medicare.gif" alt="" />U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nevada and Senate Majority Leader, is weighing increasing the Medicare payroll tax by 0.4 to 0.5 percentage point, as a way to help fund universal health care, <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wall Street Journal</span> reported Thursday (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125805315659245665.html">subscription required.</a>)<br /><br />The current employee share of the Medicare tax is 1.45%. Reid's proposal would apply to only those earning more than $250,000 per year, which would conform to President Obama's campaign promise to not raise taxes on individuals earning under $250,000 per year, CNN.com <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/11/12/source-reid-considering-hiking-medicare-payroll-tax/">reported Thursday. <br /></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reid eyeing 0.4%-0.5% Medicare payroll tax hike for health care reform</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/">Reid eyeing 0.4%-0.5% Medicare payroll tax hike for health care reform</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/reid-eyeing-0-4-0-5-medicare-payroll-tax-hike-for-health-care/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harry Reid</category><category>health care</category><category>health care reform</category><category>medicare</category><category>payroll tax</category><category>PayrollTax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tenet Healthcare swings to a Q3 loss; Humana profit jumps 65%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/tenet-healthcare-swings-to-a-q3-loss-humana-profit-jumps-65/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/tenet-healthcare-swings-to-a-q3-loss-humana-profit-jumps-65/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/tenet-healthcare-swings-to-a-q3-loss-humana-profit-jumps-65/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/humana_logo.jpg" alt="" />While the debate over health care reform rages on, hospital operator <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tenet-healthcare-corporation/thc/nys">Tenet Healthcare Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tenet-healthcare-corporation/thc/nys">THC</a>) said Tuesday it swung to a loss in the third quarter, one day after health insurer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/humana-inc/hum/nys">Humana Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/humana-inc/hum/nys">HUM</a>) posted a 65% jump in its third-quarter profit.</p>
<p><strong>Tenet</strong> said <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/ap/tenet-healthcare-takes-3q-loss-but-raises-outlook/rfid267107830?channel=pf">it lost $3 million</a>, or a penny per share. That compares with a profit of $104 million, or 22 cents per share, a year earlier. But, Tenet reported a one-time gain of $140 million a year ago after selling investments.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/tenet-healthcare-swings-to-a-q3-loss-humana-profit-jumps-65/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tenet Healthcare swings to a Q3 loss; Humana profit jumps 65%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/tenet-healthcare-swings-to-a-q3-loss-humana-profit-jumps-65/">Tenet Healthcare swings to a Q3 loss; Humana profit jumps 65%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/tenet-healthcare-swings-to-a-q3-loss-humana-profit-jumps-65/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19221362/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/tenet-healthcare-swings-to-a-q3-loss-humana-profit-jumps-65/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>health care</category><category>HUM</category><category>Humana</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Tenet Helathcare</category><category>THC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Americans' paying $1,354 health care 'tax' every second for uninsured]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/americans-paying-1-354-health-care-tax-every-second-for-unin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/americans-paying-1-354-health-care-tax-every-second-for-unin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/americans-paying-1-354-health-care-tax-every-second-for-unin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" />The health care reform debate continues, and really, given the horse-trading and logrolling that's    <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/health/Americans_pay_1_354_health_care_tax_every_second'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>   likely to occur in the upcoming conference committee to reconcile the House and Senate versions of each chamber's health care reform bill, assuming each chamber approves them, to cite a phrase used by political science professor <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Partys-Just-Begun-Political-Americas/dp/032108912X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1255109741&amp;sr=8-1">Larry Sabato</a>, <em>the party's just begun.</em><br /><br /> A bit jaded by it all? Don't be -- it's just the political process at work, and here's one, major positive to take out of the health care reform bill's passage: a new policy that will finally end the 'tax' that U.S. citizens and businesses pay for uninsured Americans who obtain health care services. <br /><br />This 'hidden health care tax' increases at the rate of $1,354 <span style="font-style: italic;">per second</span> or $116.98 million per day. As of Friday, the American people have been charged $33.37 billion this year to pay for health care for the uninsured: that's the bill that hospitals pass on to those who have insurance.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/americans-paying-1-354-health-care-tax-every-second-for-unin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Americans' paying $1,354 health care 'tax' every second for uninsured</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/americans-paying-1-354-health-care-tax-every-second-for-unin/">Americans' paying $1,354 health care 'tax' every second for uninsured</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/americans-paying-1-354-health-care-tax-every-second-for-unin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19190965/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/americans-paying-1-354-health-care-tax-every-second-for-unin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>health care reform</category><category>insurance sector</category><category>Pelosi</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can you cut your health care costs 90% and get a free vacation?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/can-you-cut-your-health-care-costs-90-and-get-a-free-vacation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/can-you-cut-your-health-care-costs-90-and-get-a-free-vacation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/can-you-cut-your-health-care-costs-90-and-get-a-free-vacation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/thailand/" rel="tag">Thailand</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aet/" rel="tag">Aetna Inc (AET)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ci/" rel="tag">CIGNA Corp (CI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/airport.jpg" width="220" height="165" alt="" />President Obama started an intense debate in recent months about national health care. People are concerned about how to pay for the high cost of health care in America and feel it is just too expensive. There has to be a better way!</p>
<p>I like oranges and I grew up in Wisconsin, but in January oranges do not grow very well in Wisconsin. I don't know why -- I am not a horticulturalist -- but maybe it's the lack of sunlight, hard frozen tundra, blowing snow or temperatures of 25 below zero. We could spend a long time pointlessly debating the actual reason.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/can-you-cut-your-health-care-costs-90-and-get-a-free-vacation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can you cut your health care costs 90% and get a free vacation?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/can-you-cut-your-health-care-costs-90-and-get-a-free-vacation/">Can you cut your health care costs 90% and get a free vacation?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/can-you-cut-your-health-care-costs-90-and-get-a-free-vacation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19181602/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/can-you-cut-your-health-care-costs-90-and-get-a-free-vacation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AET</category><category>Aetna</category><category>affordable health care</category><category>CI</category><category>Cigna</category><category>Health Care</category><category>health insurance</category><category>Medical vacation</category><category>PCLN</category><category>Priceline</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Philips knows its light tech investments will pay off]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/philips-knows-its-light-tech-investments-will-pay-off/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/philips-knows-its-light-tech-investments-will-pay-off/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/philips-knows-its-light-tech-investments-will-pay-off/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/philips-phg-logo.jpg" alt="" />I'm reiterating my Buy rating for<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/koninklijke-philips-electronics/phg/nys"> Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/koninklijke-philips-electronics/phg/nys">PHG</a>), commonly known as Philips, first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/light-technology-plays-ge-siemens-philips/#continued">on June 2, 2009</a> at a price of $20.30. If you purchased PHG then, you're up about 20%.<br /><br />Amsterdam-based Philips missed the Street's revenue and earnings estimates in Q2, in what amounted to an essentially break-even quarter.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/philips-knows-its-light-tech-investments-will-pay-off/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Philips knows its light tech investments will pay off</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/philips-knows-its-light-tech-investments-will-pay-off/">Philips knows its light tech investments will pay off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/philips-knows-its-light-tech-investments-will-pay-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19173216/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/philips-knows-its-light-tech-investments-will-pay-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer electronics</category><category>ConsumerElectronics</category><category>fluorescent bulbs</category><category>FluorescentBulbs</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>Koninklijke Philips Electronics</category><category>lighting</category><category>PHG</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Please don't tax Coke!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/coke.jpg" width="220" height="179" alt="" />As a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">Coca-Cola</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) shareholder, I was quite unnerved by recent talk centering on the issue of a soda tax. I'm sure <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PepsiCo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP</a>) shareholders were likewise frightened. According to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;sid=aPJWTERKSn2M">Bloomberg</a>, President Barack Obama is apparently open to the concept. In theory, funds generated from such a tax could be used to help defray the costs associated with a new health-care paradigm.
<p><span style="MARGIN-TOP: 7px; FLOAT: left; MARGIN-RIGHT: 10px"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Please_don_t_tax_Coke_Or_Pepsi_for_that_matter'; </script><script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>Besides raising money, what would be the justification behind such a governmental strategy? Well, excess sugar consumption can be dangerous. It can lead to all kinds of complications. You know the drill: obesity, diabetes, etc. When health issues like those rise, the cost of health care increases as well. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Please don't tax Coke!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/">Please don't tax Coke!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&amp;sid=aPJWTERKSn2M>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19157237/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/please-dont-tax-coke/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>beverage industry</category><category>beverage stocks</category><category>beverages</category><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>Coke</category><category>featured</category><category>health care</category><category>inthenews</category><category>KO</category><category>PEP</category><category>Pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>soda</category><category>tax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
