<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[2% milk to make Starbucks customers skinnier (shhh!) in U.S., Canada]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/starbucks_with_knitting.jpg" />Like your latte skinny? You may not even know it, but <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> Corporation (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) will soon replace the whole milk it pours into your coffee drinks by default <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/starbucks-switches-to-2-percent/n20070531170009990019">with 2% low-fat milk</a> in stores throughout the U.S. and Canada. Here in Oregon, where Starbucks had been testing the concept, I've been getting (ahem) skinnier for months already, and to be honest, I haven't noticed the difference in taste at all (when I'm in the mood for milk fat, I'll order a 'breve,' made with half-and-half instead of regular milk -- but I'm pregnant so you'll just have to indulge me and excuse my occasional luxury).<br /><br />Starbucks is banking that customers won't notice the difference, and if they do, they'll thank the beverage giant for the savings in calories and fat. It's somewhat ironic, as although Starbucks has been conducting a health campaign of sorts these past several months; switching to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/starbucks-removes-trans-fats-effective-now-wait-starbucks-had/">trans-fat-free pastries</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/16/hormone-free-milk-starbucks-continues-play-to-consumers-health/">hormone-free milk</a>, and offering a "light" version of the chain's popular Frappuccinos; Starbucks' beverages and treats are famous for being, often, higher in both fat and calories than many competing options (just check out <a href="http://www.thatsfit.com/category/how-many-calories/">That's Fit's "How Many Calories?"</a> feature -- which often <a href="http://www.thatsfit.com/2006/11/11/how-many-calories-in-a-starbucks-eggnog-latte/">features Starbucks drinks</a>). Even switching to 2% milk won't (for instance) negate the considerable caloric surge of three pumps of sweetened syrup -- the default for a grande beverage.<br /><br />I think the switch is a smart one, both for the bottom line and the size of the average customer's bottom. It doesn't make sense to pour whole milk by default if most customers are used to drinking 2% in their homes (which seems to be the case). However, if I were consulting Starbucks on the overall health profile of its beverages, I'd suggest a switch to far less syrup in each beverage -- all that sugar has got to be worse for us than a little milk fat. What would you change about Starbucks' beverages if you were on the product development team?
<p> </p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Starbucks_and_2_milk_Will_it_make_me_skinnier'; </script> <script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/">2% milk to make Starbucks customers skinnier (shhh!) in U.S., Canada</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/starbucks-switches-to-2-percent/n20070531170009990019>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/908747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2% milk</category><category>2%Milk</category><category>coffee</category><category>healthy</category><category>latte</category><category>low-fat milk</category><category>Low-fatMilk</category><category>milk</category><category>nonfat milk</category><category>NonfatMilk</category><category>sbux</category><category>skim milk</category><category>SkimMilk</category><category>starbucks</category><category>starbucks latte</category><category>starbucks milk</category><category>StarbucksLatte</category><category>StarbucksMilk</category><category>whole milk</category><category>WholeMilk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If you have to sin -- go for the Big One!!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/03/if-you-have-to-sin-go-for-the-big-one/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/03/if-you-have-to-sin-go-for-the-big-one/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/03/if-you-have-to-sin-go-for-the-big-one/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="don't eat your veggies"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/healthy_veggies.jpg" />Okay, let me think here for a moment, I have had a tough week in the stock market; something about issues in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/">China</a> that started it all. Oh well, people saw a dip in their savings and net worth this week... but hey, I feel good. After all I have no plans to go to China or even eat Chinese tonight. I actually feel great because let's see... Monday , I ate organically-raised salmon with a few raw vegetables!! Tuesday and Wednesday I had different variations of broiled chicken with a couple of different sauces... I am so wicked. The fresh veggies were accompanied with rice -- healthy brown rice of course. Man, I am good... following this health regime like a trooper. My doctor is going to be so proud of me! I've lost 4 pounds in 3 weeks... gimme more veggies, green, yellow, red... love em all!!
<p>I snacked on carrot sticks Tuesday and Wednesday evening and feeling a bit naughty, I even added an herb dip on Wednesday... man, I am going to become patient-of-the-week. Thursday was the <em>coup de gras</em> or whatever it is the French say -- I had baked trout, with lemon juice on the side, of course, and a baked potato, no butter, no chives, just low-fat sour cream. I had a high-fiber breakfast cereal every day this week... so who cares about the stock market's bad week, I had fantastic returns from eating right and feeling good. Those old jeans aren't so snug anymore!!</p>
<p>Friday evening... let's see, the chicken looks boring, the trout and salmon look and taste like cardboard -- I have had it!! I am going to splurge and the doctors and nurses can kiss my $%^&amp;&amp;... <a href="http://smallbusiness.aol.com/start/startup/article/_a/cashing-in-on-controversy/20070301164709990001">off I go to "Heart Attack Grill"!!</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/03/if-you-have-to-sin-go-for-the-big-one/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>If you have to sin -- go for the Big One!!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/03/if-you-have-to-sin-go-for-the-big-one/">If you have to sin -- go for the Big One!!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/03/if-you-have-to-sin-go-for-the-big-one/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/844550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/03/if-you-have-to-sin-go-for-the-big-one/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>attack</category><category>burgers</category><category>fast food</category><category>FastFood</category><category>grill</category><category>healthy</category><category>heart</category><category>heart attack grill</category><category>HeartAttackGrill</category><category>tempe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Organics are bad for you -- financially]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/organics-are-bad-for-you-financially/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/organics-are-bad-for-you-financially/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/organics-are-bad-for-you-financially/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfmi/" rel="tag">Whole Foods Market (WFMI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/cans_inpantry.jpg" alt="non-organic foods are so much more fun" id="vimage_2" />Investing in organics has been a hot trend in the past few years. Demand for organic products is so high that some companies, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_42/b4005001.htm">like Stonyfield Farms</a>, can't find enough organic milk to deliver on its organic yogurt orders. Organic farmers are doing well and news that even Wal-Mart would offer organic produce has inspired headlines that queried, will organics soon be everywhere?<br /><br />In a word, no. And what's more, it's looking like betting on organics is bad for you, financially. Whole Foods Market, Inc. (NASDAQ:WFMI), long the darling of healthy-minded investors, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/03/whole-foods-down-23/">isn't growing fast enough</a>. The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas/charts?dr=1&amp;symbs=&amp;ag=&amp;index=&amp;te=hloc&amp;se=default&amp;vl=on&amp;ss=on&amp;hs=on&amp;vs=on&amp;sym=WFMI&amp;exch=USA&amp;state=1&amp;settings=1&amp;vl1=on&amp;ss1=on&amp;dv1=off&amp;hs1=on&amp;vs1=on&amp;scs=0&amp;daysb4=0&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;freq=1&amp;timeframe=10">stock is down 27% since last week</a>. This, coupled with news that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/organic-panic-at-wal-mart/">Wal-Mart might be struggling with its organics goals</a>, has us all wondering if we should just embrace pesticides after all.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.fool.com/news/commentary/2006/commentary06102313.htm">As Alyce Lomax points out</a> and we've mentioned a number of times here on BloggingStocks, the true irony about all this is that truly faithful organics fans are almost angrily opposed to large, industrial farms. So that, by embracing this positive, healthy movement -- by making organic Rice Krispies, of all things -- in the blindly optimistic American way, which is by standardizing, industrializing, making really really big ... American businesses are perverting everything that is organic. [<em>The Onion</em> <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/54916">made hilarious fun of this trend in a satire here</a>.] It's just not "sustainable" if it's done in tons for the Kellogg Company (NYSE:K). <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_42/b4005001.htm">As <em>BusinessWeek</em> says so eloquently</a>, it's "the organic paradox: The movement's adherents have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams, but success has imperiled their ideals."<br /><br />Not only have ideals been imperiled, but also: profit. See here's the thing.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/organics-are-bad-for-you-financially/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Organics are bad for you -- financially</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/organics-are-bad-for-you-financially/">Organics are bad for you -- financially</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/label-may-say-healthy-but-grocer-begs-to/20061106070109990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/organics-are-bad-for-you-financially/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/697242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/organics-are-bad-for-you-financially/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>farm</category><category>farming</category><category>farms</category><category>food</category><category>hannaford's</category><category>health</category><category>healthy</category><category>healthy food</category><category>HealthyFood</category><category>kellogg</category><category>organic</category><category>organic farms</category><category>organic food</category><category>OrganicFarms</category><category>OrganicFood</category><category>organics</category><category>rice krispies</category><category>RiceKrispies</category><category>stonyfield</category><category>stonyfield farms</category><category>stonyfield yogurt</category><category>StonyfieldFarms</category><category>StonyfieldYogurt</category><category>sustainability</category><category>sustainable</category><category>sustainable practices</category><category>SustainablePractices</category><category>yogurt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 14:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney Princesses to push healthful products: thank you Disney?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/disney-princesses-to-push-healthful-products-thank-you-disney/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/disney-princesses-to-push-healthful-products-thank-you-disney/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/disney-princesses-to-push-healthful-products-thank-you-disney/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="the cult of princess" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/disney_cultofprincess.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />We parents of young children love to rail and rant at Disney and its Princesses, going so far as to hail the <em>New York Times</em> when it did an expos&eacute; of sorts <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20A13FB3D5A0C708CDDA80994DD404482">on the cult of princess</a>. Not only do the princesses create all kinds of stereotypical, feminine-victim role models, goes the theory, but also they <a href="http://www.bloggingbaby.com/2005/11/03/cinderellas-marketers-downplaying-the-cinders/">promote unhealthy products</a>! The scourge of every grocery store shopping trip is the begging for Disney Princess cereal, or fruit snacks, or (as I encountered last week at Walgreen's, and I don't even have a little girl): Disney Princess gummy bracelets. I do not lie. In fact, I even ate one.</p>
<p>Well, I may have to begrudgingly thank The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS), who has finally decided to be a little more circumspect about the products its princesses, and the rest of the company's characters, push like so many barely nutritional drugs over the supermarket counter. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116101363173993975.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">According to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> today</a> [subscription required], Disney's CEO, Robert Iger, introduced guidelines to ensure that "its name and characters only will be used on kid-focused products that meet certain guidelines in terms of calories, fat, saturated fat and sugar."</p>
<iframe border="1" align="left" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1210&amp;view=91866&amp;pollId=91949&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews2" frameborder="1" width="185" scrolling="no" height="150" allowtransparency="allowtransparency"></iframe>
<p>Hurray! Parents of little girls (and princess-loving boys, like mine) can finally venture into the grocery stores again. Well, not so fast: Disney will be bound by its existing contractual agreements for as long as two years, and the campaign will take "several years" to roll out internationally. As PR moves go, it's wonderful and I honor Iger for his foresight. <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/newsanalysis/mediaentertainment/10315294.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA"><em>Incredibles</em> instant oatmeal</a>? Incredible!</p>
<p>However. The impact of this move will be slow and the brand damage has already been done. I mean! Disney Princess gummy bracelets! Can Disney recover?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/disney-princesses-to-push-healthful-products-thank-you-disney/">Disney Princesses to push healthful products: thank you Disney?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116101363173993975.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/disney-princesses-to-push-healthful-products-thank-you-disney/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/685781/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/disney-princesses-to-push-healthful-products-thank-you-disney/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>disney</category><category>disney characters</category><category>disney characters promotion</category><category>disney princesses</category><category>DisneyCharacters</category><category>DisneyCharactersPromotion</category><category>DisneyPrincesses</category><category>health</category><category>healthy</category><category>princess</category><category>princesses</category><category>promotion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart cracks down on unhealthy workers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/14/wal-mart-cracks-down-on-unhealthy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/14/wal-mart-cracks-down-on-unhealthy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/14/wal-mart-cracks-down-on-unhealthy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p>I sat next to a guy named "Trent" at my first real job. He took sick days about once a week, and we all laughed about it; but secretly resented him for taking advantage of the rest of us working stiffs, who actually <em>worked </em>every day. And dared not to take sick days for fear our bosses would think badly of us; that we were lazy, or hypochondriacs, or <em>unhealthy</em>.</p>
<p>Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT) is cracking down on the Trents in its workforce, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116076559220592155.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">according to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> this morning</a> [subscription required]. The company has enacted a new attendance policy. Now, if you have the sniffles, or chronic back pain, or a hangover, or mono, you have to call an 800-number; obtain a code; and give that code to your manager. The system will track sick time and whether or not your absence is authorized; those employees who get too many unauthorized absences will be terminated.</p>
<p>Even more ominous, employees with too many sick days will be encouraged to apply for an unpaid leave of absence. Critics naturally are attacking Wal-Mart from every direction, wondering if the company is trying to shuck the unhealthy workers from its roles. Whether or not this is true, it's certainly an icky process for Wal-Mart to enact, and seems a bad move for a company already under fire for overworking its employees.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/14/wal-mart-cracks-down-on-unhealthy/">Wal-Mart cracks down on unhealthy workers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116076559220592155.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/14/wal-mart-cracks-down-on-unhealthy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/684749/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/14/wal-mart-cracks-down-on-unhealthy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>800</category><category>800 number</category><category>800Number</category><category>benefits</category><category>healthy</category><category>sick</category><category>sick days</category><category>sick time</category><category>SickDays</category><category>SickTime</category><category>unhealthy</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><category>workforce</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pepsi cares about the health of Chicagoans ... how about everyone else?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/pepsi-cares-about-the-health-of-chicagoans-how-about-everyon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/pepsi-cares-about-the-health-of-chicagoans-how-about-everyon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/pepsi-cares-about-the-health-of-chicagoans-how-about-everyon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/pepsi.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" /></div>
<p>When my b-school buddy, Jaime, started working in the corporate strategy group at PepsiCo, Inc. (NYSE:PEP), I knew the time had come: soon she'd somehow convince the company to change its ways and become healthy! Starting with that high fructose corn syrup that fills so many of the company's sodas and is (I insist) one of the leading causes of childhood obesity.</p>
<p>Imagine my surprise when I saw one of the front-page headlines for the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> today [subscription required]: "<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116001454312883351.html?mod=hps_us_pageone">Pepsi Sales Force Tries to Push 'Healthier' Snacks in Inner City</a>." No, it wasn't that scourge of sweetener, HFCS: it was chips. Especially those preservative- and saturated fat-packed Flamin' Hot Cheetos and Nacho Cheese Doritos. I can just see the orange fingers all over Chicago, now.</p>
<p>Company executives are using top-down tactics to push Baked Lays and other lower-fat options in the inner city. Already Pepsi is on my good list for having removed trans-fats (i.e. partially hydrogenated vegetable oils) from the company's chips. Chicagoans, though, are skeptical and the convenience stores where PepsiCo sales efforts are focused are reacting with the speed of dinosaur bones fossilizing. Or thereabouts.</p>
<p>Maybe customers aren't jumping all over themselves for Baked Lays. [And it's interesting to note that these efforts are all the work of outgoing CEO Steve Reinemund, who was relieved of leadership by Indra Nooyi earlier this week -- there's no telling what her plans regarding the healthy sales will be.] But I have an idea, Pepsi! Take out that high fructose corn syrup and replace it with some nice cane syrup, or something else far less chemically altered. Your customers won't notice. And boy will I buy your stock then.</p>
<p>As it is, nice effort. Keep up the good work Pepsi, I'd much rather have corporate efforts wasted (if indeed they are, as the <em>WSJ</em> suggests, beating the corporate head against the inner-city Chicago wall) on trying to convince customers to eat my healthier options than on, I don't know, spying on one another, or padding the pockets of tainted lobbyists. Ya know?</p>
<p>I may be the only one, though. Despite the mention, shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys">PEP were down 13 cents today</a>, to $64.78. It's worth mentioning that the stock is only a dollar or so from its 52-week high, and the three-year trend is nuthin' but up. Healthy just may be good for increasing the wealth in your pockets, as well as the pants that hold them.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/pepsi-cares-about-the-health-of-chicagoans-how-about-everyon/">Pepsi cares about the health of Chicagoans ... how about everyone else?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/pepsi-cares-about-the-health-of-chicagoans-how-about-everyon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/680418/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/05/pepsi-cares-about-the-health-of-chicagoans-how-about-everyon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baked</category><category>baked lays</category><category>BakedLays</category><category>cheetos</category><category>doritos</category><category>healthy</category><category>hfcs</category><category>high fructose corn syrup</category><category>HighFructoseCornSyrup</category><category>jaime kriss</category><category>JaimeKriss</category><category>lays</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>pototo chips</category><category>PototoChips</category><category>reinemund</category><category>steve reinemund</category><category>SteveReinemund</category><category>trans-fatty acids</category><category>Trans-fattyAcids</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:16:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
