<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Blockbuster's Terrible Q1]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/14/blockbusters-terrible-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/14/blockbusters-terrible-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/14/blockbusters-terrible-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/blockbusterlogo220.jpg" />Blockbuster (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>) is not a stock any sane investor should buy. First, it's under a buck. Second, it is currently down over 20% in afternoon trading, backed by significant volume. I'm seeing a price of just under 40 cents as I write this. Not a good situation.<br />
<br />
Yet, I'm sure there are a fair amount of professional speculators out there making bets on the business. Hey, I can't predict the future, but I just don't see how anyone can take a chance on the shares. The <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys/tech-chart">one-year chart</a> is terrible. And the most recent earnings report, released yesterday after the bell, is likewise a horrible sight to behold.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/14/blockbusters-terrible-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Blockbuster's Terrible Q1</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/14/blockbusters-terrible-q1/">Blockbuster's Terrible Q1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 May 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/blockbuster-posts-1q-loss-sees/617876/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/14/blockbusters-terrible-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19477830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/14/blockbusters-terrible-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>Blockbuster</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>coinstar</category><category>Comcast</category><category>CSTR</category><category>DVD</category><category>home video</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>RedBox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix Weak Today -- Sell Before 2010?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/netflix-weak-today-sell-before-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/netflix-weak-today-sell-before-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/netflix-weak-today-sell-before-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/04-09-08_netflix.jpg" />Netflix, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) is trading down today. Looks like investors aren't in the mood for the stock just before the new year begins. At the time of this writing, shares of the online DVD-rental concern were off by nearly 3%. </p>
<p>Kind of sad, when you think about it. Netflix is up big on the year. It was a great story of capital appreciation: buy the dips, and you made out. Whenever you thought the company was about to head into a downturn, it ended up proving you wrong. When things seemed just absolutely awful, like they did back in the first quarter, Netflix was resilient in the face of financial adversity. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/netflix-weak-today-sell-before-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix Weak Today -- Sell Before 2010?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/netflix-weak-today-sell-before-2010/">Netflix Weak Today -- Sell Before 2010?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/28743/Netflix+Rallies+on+Takeover+Rumor+-+Analyst+Blog>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/netflix-weak-today-sell-before-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19298488/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/netflix-weak-today-sell-before-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>Blockbuster</category><category>cmcsa</category><category>Coinstar</category><category>Comcast</category><category>CSTR</category><category>DVD</category><category>featured</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>Redbox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A resolution for Hollywood in the new year: Get home video moving again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/a-resolution-for-hollywood-in-the-new-year-get-home-video-movin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/a-resolution-for-hollywood-in-the-new-year-get-home-video-movin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/a-resolution-for-hollywood-in-the-new-year-get-home-video-movin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p>The DVD market continues to disappoint. There's an article over at <em><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i9759cd94a98520c0e60698a210332d08">The Hollywood Reporter</a></em> discussing the industry and its sorry state. According to the piece, sales of discs are down 13% at the end of the third quarter. </p>
<p>Interestingly enough, the article goes on to give a positive spin to the news by pointing out that the Blu-ray format is gaining traction, and that digital distribution and rental of discs are also acting as offsetting elements. While that may be true, I'm not so sure I can be as positive, because I still believe that the studios have a long way to go in terms of answering the DVD issue. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/a-resolution-for-hollywood-in-the-new-year-get-home-video-movin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A resolution for Hollywood in the new year: Get home video moving again</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/a-resolution-for-hollywood-in-the-new-year-get-home-video-movin/">A resolution for Hollywood in the new year: Get home video moving again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i9759cd94a98520c0e60698a210332d08>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/a-resolution-for-hollywood-in-the-new-year-get-home-video-movin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/a-resolution-for-hollywood-in-the-new-year-get-home-video-movin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CMCSA</category><category>Comcast</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blockbuster: A bomb of a quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/blockbusterlogo220.jpg" />Blockbuster (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>) is a terrible company and stock. After perusing the third-quarter report, published Friday after the bell, I don't see any reason to modify such a rough statement.</p>
<p>Sorry about that, but what else can I say about a huge revenue decline and a wider loss coupled with a story that continues to deteriorate? According to the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/blockbuster-reports-third-quarter-2009-financial-results/rfid270228485?channel=pf">Q3 earnings release</a>, Blockbuster experienced a 21% drop on the top line. On an adjusted basis, the company lost 20 cents per share, compared to 9 cents per share in the comparable period a year ago. Helping to drive this abject performance was a 14% contraction in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/same%20store%20sales">same-store sales</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Blockbuster: A bomb of a quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/">Blockbuster: A bomb of a quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/blockbuster-reports-third-quarter-2009-financial-results/rfid270228485?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/blockbuster-a-bomb-of-a-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>Blockbuster</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>Coinstar</category><category>comcast</category><category>CSTR</category><category>DVD</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>Redbox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Content companies want more money from Netflix]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/content-companies-want-more-money-from-netflix/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/content-companies-want-more-money-from-netflix/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/content-companies-want-more-money-from-netflix/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/04-09-08_netflix.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) is feeling a little heat from studios <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal. The major media companies would all like to make more money from Netflix's business model, according to <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2009/09/netflix_--_have.html"><em>BusinessWeek</em></a>.  </p>
<p>No one is really satisfied these days with the DVD industry. Growth in home video is no longer what it used to be. So content makers perceive a need to engage new strategies to offset the this lack of expansion. It would be nice if those strategies were confined to innovation in movie development and the reduction of project budgets. Instead, trying to negotiate more beneficial deals with distributors such as Netflix will probably be the focus of media execs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/content-companies-want-more-money-from-netflix/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Content companies want more money from Netflix</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/content-companies-want-more-money-from-netflix/">Content companies want more money from Netflix</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/FineOnMedia/archives/2009/09/netflix_--_have.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/content-companies-want-more-money-from-netflix/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19181726/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/content-companies-want-more-money-from-netflix/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DVD</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>netflix</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NFLX</category><category>NWS</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will media companies ever get people to pay for web content?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/will-media-companies-ever-get-people-to-pay-for-web-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/will-media-companies-ever-get-people-to-pay-for-web-content/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/will-media-companies-ever-get-people-to-pay-for-web-content/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/roommate-search-online-woman-200a012307.jpg" />I caught an item over the weekend at <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-news-corp.-our-research-proves-people-will-pay-online/">paidContent</a> about paying for content. Come to think of it, what else would you expect to find over at that site? All joking aside, paying for content in the digital age is actually a very serious issue for media investors. If you're a shareholder of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), as I am, then you know both of those businesses have ample exposure to intellectual properties that management would like to exploit over the web. For a fee, of course.</p>
<p>The paidContent piece discusses research apparently conducted by a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) subsidiary that suggests consumers would be willing to pay for stuff on the internet. All I can say is, I hope the research turns out to be accurate.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/will-media-companies-ever-get-people-to-pay-for-web-content/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will media companies ever get people to pay for web content?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/will-media-companies-ever-get-people-to-pay-for-web-content/">Will media companies ever get people to pay for web content?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/will-media-companies-ever-get-people-to-pay-for-web-content/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19174924/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/will-media-companies-ever-get-people-to-pay-for-web-content/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>content</category><category>digital distribution</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>home video</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix delivers a Q2 that proves critics wrong]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/netflix-delivers-a-q2-that-proves-critics-wrong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/netflix-delivers-a-q2-that-proves-critics-wrong/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/netflix-delivers-a-q2-that-proves-critics-wrong/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/04-09-08_netflix.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) released its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/netflix-announces-q2-2009-financial-results/rfid234870913?channel=pf">Q2 report</a> on Thursday after the bell. You had to like what you saw. Revenues increased 21%. Total subscribers went up 26%. Growth in net subscribers on a year-over-year basis was impressive, as was the increase observed in the gross margin. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow%20-%20FCF">Free cash flow</a> was up. And now for the final piece of the performance puzzle: adjusted earnings per share increased 29% to 58 cents. Very good.</p>
<p>Consumers have really taken to the Netflix model. They love getting DVDs by mail. And Netflix has really done a job on its major competitor, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">Blockbuster</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>). No doubt about it, I'm sure a lot of Blockbuster shareholders are wishing they were invested in Netflix.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/netflix-delivers-a-q2-that-proves-critics-wrong/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix delivers a Q2 that proves critics wrong</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/netflix-delivers-a-q2-that-proves-critics-wrong/">Netflix delivers a Q2 that proves critics wrong</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/netflix-announces-q2-2009-financial-results/rfid234870913?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/netflix-delivers-a-q2-that-proves-critics-wrong/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19108135/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/netflix-delivers-a-q2-that-proves-critics-wrong/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>dvd rentals</category><category>DvdRentals</category><category>featured</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>Redbox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney Channel does it again with 'Princess' film, but it still has challenges]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/disney-channel-does-it-again-with-princess-film-but-it-still/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/disney-channel-does-it-again-with-princess-film-but-it-still/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/disney-channel-does-it-again-with-princess-film-but-it-still/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walt-disney-company-dis-logo.jpg" /></a> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) programmed a new movie recently on one of its prime media assets. The film, titled <em>Princess Protection Program</em>, debuted on the Disney Channel and stars a young actress named Selena Gomez. The casting choice was no accident. Because Disney tries to be as synergistic as possible (the company is generally good when it comes to the science of synergy, although there are certainly opportunities for it to be even better), the Mouse made sure to use Gomez since she is the popular star of another Disney Channel program called <em>Wizards of Waverly Place</em>, a project meant to capture at least a little of the Harry Potter magic. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/disney-channel-does-it-again-with-princess-film-but-it-still/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney Channel does it again with 'Princess' film, but it still has challenges</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/disney-channel-does-it-again-with-princess-film-but-it-still/">Disney Channel does it again with 'Princess' film, but it still has challenges</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/disney-channel-does-it-again-with-princess-film-but-it-still/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19085788/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/disney-channel-does-it-again-with-princess-film-but-it-still/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bob Iger</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Disney Channel</category><category>DVD</category><category>home video</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>princess protection program</category><category>selena gomez</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>wizards of waverly place</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix upgraded: What does this mean for investors?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/netflix-upgraded-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/netflix-upgraded-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/netflix-upgraded-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/04-09-08_netflix.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>), a DVD-rental business that competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">Blockbuster</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>), was <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-shares-advance-on-wedbush-morgan-upgrade?siteid=aolRss">upgraded yesterday</a> by Michael Pachter, an analyst with Wedbush Morgan Securities. He sees good tidings ahead for the company. He believes that Netflix will see higher margins and a healthy stream of earnings. His thesis centers on the fact that the subscriber base is likely to grow and that streaming movies will lower the cost of delivery. </p>
<p>Upgrades are tricky beasts. Ideally, an investor or, more likely, a trader, wants to be in the stock before the upgrade occurs. Buying a company after it's been upgraded requires a lot of due diligence. And you have to get over the fact that you might be buying at a high price. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/netflix-upgraded-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix upgraded: What does this mean for investors?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/netflix-upgraded-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/">Netflix upgraded: What does this mean for investors?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/netflix-shares-advance-on-wedbush-morgan-upgrade?siteid=aolRss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/netflix-beats-in-q1-but-investors-sold-stock-after-report-ba/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/netflix-upgraded-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19070668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/netflix-upgraded-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>DVD</category><category>DVD rental</category><category>DvdRental</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>michael pachter</category><category>MichaelPachter</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>upgrade</category><category>wedbush morgan</category><category>WedbushMorgan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blockbuster beats in Q1, but stock is too big a gamble]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/blockbuster-beats-in-q1-but-stock-is-too-big-a-gamble/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/blockbuster-beats-in-q1-but-stock-is-too-big-a-gamble/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/blockbuster-beats-in-q1-but-stock-is-too-big-a-gamble/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/bbilogo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></div>
<p>You know you're probably looking at a tough business situation when the first thing you see on an earnings release is a pair of bullet points related to financing strategies that are clearly meant to show the reader that a company is getting its house in order. </p>
<p>Such was the case with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">Blockbuster</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>) and its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/blockbuster-reports-first-quarter-2009/rfid213694321">Q1 report</a>, which came out Thursday after the bell. Remember, this is the company that, not long ago, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/blockbuster-gets-a-going-concern-notice/">received a notice</a> about its woes.</p>
<p>Liquidity is the name of the game these days for Blockbuster. Too bad it isn't the company's business model. As far as that goes, the video-rental chain is still having its difficulties. Revenues dipped 19% to $1.1 billion. On an adjusted basis, net income came out to 19 cents per share versus 21 cents per share in the year-ago period. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/blockbuster-beats-in-q1-but-stock-is-too-big-a-gamble/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Blockbuster beats in Q1, but stock is too big a gamble</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/blockbuster-beats-in-q1-but-stock-is-too-big-a-gamble/">Blockbuster beats in Q1, but stock is too big a gamble</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 May 2009 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/blockbuster-gets-a-going-concern-notice/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/blockbuster-reports-first-quarter-2009/rfid213694321>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/blockbuster-beats-in-q1-but-stock-is-too-big-a-gamble/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1546721/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/blockbuster-beats-in-q1-but-stock-is-too-big-a-gamble/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>comcast</category><category>DVD</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix beats in Q1, but investors sold stock after report -- bad sign?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/netflix-beats-in-q1-but-investors-sold-stock-after-report-ba/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/netflix-beats-in-q1-but-investors-sold-stock-after-report-ba/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/netflix-beats-in-q1-but-investors-sold-stock-after-report-ba/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/04-09-08_netflix.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) did a spectacular job in Q1. The famous DVD-rental-by-mail entity issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/netflix-announces-q1-2009-financial/rfid206973901">quarterly numbers</a> on Thursday after the bell. On an adjusted basis, Netflix delivered 40 cents per diluted share. That represented bottom-line growth of over 70%. I guess movies truly are resistant to recessions, huh? Revenues advanced over 20%.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=nflx">earnings.com</a>, that 40-cent figure means that management destroyed expectations since Wall Street was looking for somewhere around 31 cents per share. I should point out, however, that I've noticed that some other sources listed the expectations as being a little higher than 31 cents. No matter, Netflix beat the bottom line. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/netflix-beats-in-q1-but-investors-sold-stock-after-report-ba/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix beats in Q1, but investors sold stock after report -- bad sign?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/netflix-beats-in-q1-but-investors-sold-stock-after-report-ba/">Netflix beats in Q1, but investors sold stock after report -- bad sign?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/netflix-announces-q1-2009-financial/rfid206973901>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=nflx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-ceo-more-streaming-deals-coming-2009-4>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/wsj-netflix-has-risen-too-high/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/netflix-beats-in-q1-but-investors-sold-stock-after-report-ba/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1526495/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/24/netflix-beats-in-q1-but-investors-sold-stock-after-report-ba/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>BBI</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>Blu-ray</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>Comcast</category><category>DVD</category><category>featured</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>video on demand</category><category>VideoOnDemand</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix beats expectations -- is the stock a buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/netflix-beats-expectations-is-the-stock-a-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/netflix-beats-expectations-is-the-stock-a-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/netflix-beats-expectations-is-the-stock-a-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas"><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/nflx-netflix-logo.jpg" />Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) reported earnings for Q4 on Monday after the bell, and according to Trey Thoelcke's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/monday-earnings-recap-netflix-amgen-halliburton-wyeth-tyson/">recap article</a>, the DVD rental company blew past expectations. Wall Street was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/25/the-week-in-preview-high-hopes-for-mcdonalds-pfizer-netflix/">looking for $0.34</a> per share on a top line of $354.2 million. Well, Netflix delivered $360 million in net sales and $0.38 per share on the bottom line. That was an increase of 19% and 65% for the top and bottom lines, respectively. </p>
<p>Call me impressed. These are great numbers. In fact, Netflix added a net 718,000 subscribers in Q4. Last year at this time, the company added a net 415,000 subscribers. Now, let's look at the cash flow. According to the <a href="http://netflix.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&amp;item=304">earnings release</a>, Netflix is doing fine here, too. Free cash flow for Q4 more than doubled to $51 million. Free cash flow for the year also doubled to more than $94 million. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/netflix-beats-expectations-is-the-stock-a-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix beats expectations -- is the stock a buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/netflix-beats-expectations-is-the-stock-a-buy/">Netflix beats expectations -- is the stock a buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://netflix.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&amp;item=304>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/netflix-beats-expectations-is-the-stock-a-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1441508/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/netflix-beats-expectations-is-the-stock-a-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>dvds</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>movies</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blockbuster's Q3 shows that the stock is appropriately cheap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/blockbusters-q3-shows-that-the-stock-is-appropriately-cheap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/blockbusters-q3-shows-that-the-stock-is-appropriately-cheap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/blockbusters-q3-shows-that-the-stock-is-appropriately-cheap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">Blockbuster</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/blockbuster-inc-class-a/bbi/nys">BBI</a>), the troubled DVD-rental chain that competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>), <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0654099520081107?rpc=33&amp;sp=true">reported earnings</a> for the third quarter on Thursday. The top line decreased by a little under 3%, and the net loss per share was $0.08 on an adjusted basis, which was $0.07 better than expected. Okay, I suppose that's kind of cool from a certain angle. In fact, one analyst quoted in the piece had a good take on the company. </p>
<p>I, however, do not have a good take on Blockbuster. I am not bullish in the least. For one thing, it takes a lot to look past a net loss and say that there's something to the earnings story that goes beyond the bottom line. For another thing, the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/blockbuster-reports-third-quarter-2008/rfid155932496">press release</a> indicates that Blockbuster is not doing well in terms of cash flow. Management needed to use $18.2 million for operations during the third quarter, which was slightly more than the amount needed in last year's similar period. And as for free cash flow, that was negative $53.7 million in Q3 2008 versus negative $38.6 million in Q3 2007. This doesn't scream "Buy Blockbuster!", does it? <br /></p>
<p>Another negative aspect to the story is that the gross margin went down by 70 basis points. I will give one bit of credit, however: same-store sales for domestic locations actually increased slightly over 5%, and worldwide comps expanded by almost 2%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/blockbusters-q3-shows-that-the-stock-is-appropriately-cheap/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Blockbuster's Q3 shows that the stock is appropriately cheap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/blockbusters-q3-shows-that-the-stock-is-appropriately-cheap/">Blockbuster's Q3 shows that the stock is appropriately cheap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0654099520081107?rpc=33&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/blockbusters-q3-shows-that-the-stock-is-appropriately-cheap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1364923/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/blockbusters-q3-shows-that-the-stock-is-appropriately-cheap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>Blockbuster</category><category>dvd</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>movie rentals</category><category>MovieRentals</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Netflix's earnings picture was a success, but what about the recession?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/netflixs-earnings-picture-was-a-success-but-what-about-the-rec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/netflixs-earnings-picture-was-a-success-but-what-about-the-rec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/netflixs-earnings-picture-was-a-success-but-what-about-the-rec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbi/" rel="tag">Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">Netflix</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netflix-inc/nflx/nas">NFLX</a>) had something of a flashy <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/netflix-announces-q3-2008-financial/rfid150636383">third quarter</a>. The online DVD-rental company reported the numbers on Monday after the market closed. Revenues did well, rising 16% to $341.3 million. The bottom line, however, was an even better story. Earnings per diluted share on an adjusted basis rose 38% to 36 cents. How does this compare to Wall Street estimates? Beautifully, as <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN2035517720081020?rpc=33&amp;sp=true">analysts were looking</a> for 34 cents per share. So management was able to deliver two extra pennies. It's cool when a company can go beyond the usual beat-by-a-penny routine, isn't it?</p>
<p>I applaud Netflix for its earnings data, but I can't say I'm a huge fan of its current cash-flow performance. Operating cash flow dipped nearly 6% to approximately $73 million. Free cash flow declined almost 28% to about $26 million. Looking at other numbers, I see that gross subscriber additions increased 18% on a year-over-year basis. Gross margin also improved. <br /></p>
<p>Unfortunately, CEO Reed Hastings believes that the <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-earnings-call-netflix-ceo-hastings-were-not-immune-to-the-recession-aft/">recession will negatively affect</a> subscriber growth rates. Of course it will. At this point, every business, and more importantly to investors and traders, every stock is going to feel the wrath of the economy and the market bears. Sure, Netflix made deals with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/netflix-teams-with-starz-to-stream-2-500-movie-titles/">Starz</a> and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) that may help the company offset some of the economic realities out there, but I think the bottom line is that you'll have to be careful about buying Netflix at this point in time.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/netflixs-earnings-picture-was-a-success-but-what-about-the-rec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Netflix's earnings picture was a success, but what about the recession?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/netflixs-earnings-picture-was-a-success-but-what-about-the-rec/">Netflix's earnings picture was a success, but what about the recession?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN2035517720081020?rpc=33&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/netflixs-earnings-picture-was-a-success-but-what-about-the-rec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1347880/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/21/netflixs-earnings-picture-was-a-success-but-what-about-the-rec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BBI</category><category>Blockbuster</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dvd</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Netflix</category><category>NFLX</category><category>reed hastings</category><category>ReedHastings</category><category>Starz</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Metacafe: The economics of watching stuff on the web]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/metacafe-the-economics-of-watching-stuff-on-the-web/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/metacafe-the-economics-of-watching-stuff-on-the-web/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/metacafe-the-economics-of-watching-stuff-on-the-web/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a></p><p>Are you an entertaining person? Are you a visual story teller? Can you capture an audiences attention and make them respond to you? If you think you have what it takes to create interest, incite and entertain, then there are options open to you. Don't just tell me you're an artist. Grab your video camera and <em>prove it on Metacafe.</em></p>
<p>Metacafe is not just another video sharing website. <a href="http://www.metacafe.com/producer_rewards_videos/most_popular/">Metacafe has something for you.</a> Cold hard cash awaits the future producer of indie films. As of this writing, the top earning video on Metacafe has pulled $26,683. Note that it has taken about two and a half years to do that. Still though, that's not a bad return on less than four minutes of video. Other vid-clips on the site have generated between $3,000 and $8,000 for their creators. While not an amount that you could live on, it's still real money which could help pay the bills.</p>
<p>I myself have several ideas that I'd like to try in pursuit of Internet-based revenue generation. I <em>do </em>call myself an artist and I have the ability to make people sit up and take notice. What I don't have is a high-speed Internet connection...</p>
<p>I guess my gay version of Gumby will have to wait a while longer... and his pony pal Pokie will too.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/metacafe-the-economics-of-watching-stuff-on-the-web/">Metacafe: The economics of watching stuff on the web</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.metacafe.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/metacafe-the-economics-of-watching-stuff-on-the-web/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/879811/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/metacafe-the-economics-of-watching-stuff-on-the-web/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>films</category><category>get rich</category><category>GetRich</category><category>home video</category><category>HomeVideo</category><category>indie</category><category>internet</category><category>make money</category><category>MakeMoney</category><category>Metacafe</category><category>private</category><category>video</category><category>web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
