<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Contractor Spending in Afghanistan Includes $1 Billion Wasted]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/us-soldier-iraq.jpg" />An audit memorandum prepared by Senator Claire McCaskill's staff puts the amount of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BH02S20091218">money spent on reconstruction and redevelopment contracts in Afghanistan</a> at $23 billion, with $1 billion of it waste. So, was $22 billion well spent?<br />
<br />
The funds have been spent on a variety of projects, including the construction of roads and the development of power generation utilities to agriculture, urban development and water sanitation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Contractor Spending in Afghanistan Includes $1 Billion Wasted</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/">Contractor Spending in Afghanistan Includes $1 Billion Wasted</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BH02S20091218>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19286182/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/18/contractor-spending-in-afghanistan-includes-1-billion-wasted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>afghanistan</category><category>Afghanistan war</category><category>AfghanistanWar</category><category>Homeland Security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>house of representatives</category><category>HouseOfRepresentatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>military</category><category>military contracts</category><category>MilitaryContracts</category><category>Senate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Toast: The Bush legacy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/toast-the-bush-legacy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/toast-the-bush-legacy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/toast-the-bush-legacy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hal/" rel="tag">Halliburton (HAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/burnt_toast.jpg" alt="" />The elections are upon us with less than 24 hours before the polls open. Our current president George W. Bush has sat by as the economy went from good to bad to worse and his reputation and political standing went with it.<br /><br />I have voted Republican and I have voted Democrat. I vote for the person, not the party. As the nation ponders who will be sitting in the Oval Office in 2009 I am quite confident that I am not alone. From day one I have felt that Dubya was in the White House because of dear old dad, the senior being far more qualified than junior. Junior became the front man for ideologues more intent on forcing their will upon others after a very dubious election result than all else.<br /><br />From what I have seen and read, GWB has never been a great success at anything but politics, and now that reputation is toast too. While history has been kind to some past presidents allowing at least partial redemption -- Truman as direct, honest and a strong leader, Nixon on foreign policy issues, and most recently Carter as a humanitarian -- our current president has little to show for his eight years.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/toast-the-bush-legacy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Toast: The Bush legacy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/toast-the-bush-legacy/">Toast: The Bush legacy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/toast-the-bush-legacy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1336631/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/toast-the-bush-legacy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cheney</category><category>Dubya</category><category>featured</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>GeorgeW.Bush</category><category>HAL</category><category>Halliburton</category><category>Homeland Security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>SEC</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to play more cargo screening]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/21/how-to-play-more-cargo-screening/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/21/how-to-play-more-cargo-screening/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/21/how-to-play-more-cargo-screening/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>Like any stock market loser, when I read the news I'm always looking for any potential ideas that can come from the story's theme. When I read a BusinessWeek article about Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff "<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8QGKC6O0.htm">promising more cargo screening</a>" my mind immediately thought about the ramifications this move would have on the defense sector. I'm happy that the Homeland Security Secretary is starting to do something after his bold predictions of terrorist activist just a few weeks ago.</p>
<p>In my research I've found a company that should directly benefit from this spending on increased screening -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-science-and-engineering-inc/asei/nas">American Science &amp; Engineering</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-science-and-engineering-inc/asei/nas">ASEI</a>). Surprisingly, the stock didn't move on this news, which makes the situation even better as it seems the connection between American Science &amp; Engineering (AS&amp;E) and the Chertoff announcement flew over most people's heads. I think the reason for this is that AS&amp;E wasn't in any way tied to the article, meaning the article doesn't mention the stock, or any other stock for that matter.</p>
<p>American Science &amp; Engineering isn't a one-trick pony or a poorly developed company. In fact, the company boasts a strong product line, and an undervaluation when compared to its sector.</p>
<p>The company's product line is quite diversified between a wide variety of innovative and useful security technologies. AS&amp;E's SmartCheck screening system basically creates an electronic chalk outline of the person being screened -- any potential weapons, for example, stick out from the body. The TSA has begun pilot testing this technology. The company's Gemini X-ray system is also very interesting. When compared to standard x-ray scanners, the product has been shown to more easily detect metal objects and fine details. Like the SmartCheck, it is easy to see the applicability of the Gemini in today's world. Lastly, and my reason for writing this story, AS&amp;E has a product that provides excellent cargo and vehicle inspection -- the OmniView.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/21/how-to-play-more-cargo-screening/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How to play more cargo screening</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/21/how-to-play-more-cargo-screening/">How to play more cargo screening</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/21/how-to-play-more-cargo-screening/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/945853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/21/how-to-play-more-cargo-screening/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Science and Engineering</category><category>AmericanScienceAndEngineering</category><category>ASE</category><category>ASEI</category><category>cargo screening</category><category>CargoScreening</category><category>Chertoff</category><category>defense sector</category><category>Gemini X-ray</category><category>GeminiX-ray</category><category>Homeland Security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>Michael Chertoff</category><category>OmniView</category><category>SmartCheck</category><category>TSA</category><category>Z Backscatter</category><category>ZBackscatter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up 7-11-07: Dell to eliminate trialware in some new computers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-7-11-07/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-7-11-07/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-7-11-07/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rtp/" rel="tag">Rio Tinto plc ADS (RIO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/liz/" rel="tag">Liz Claiborne (LIZ)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Thanks to a downturn in sales, sportswear maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/liz-claiborne-inc/liz/nys">Liz Claiborne Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/liz-claiborne-inc/liz/nys">LIZ</a>) will seek to divest itself of 16 of its 36 apparel brands, equal to about $800 million of its $5 nillion in annual revenue, reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118411798145562863.html?mod=home_whats_news_us "><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required)</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/f7e7dc92-2f35-11dc-b9b7-0000779fd2ac.html "><em>Financial Times</em></a> (subscription required) reported that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) has listened to customer concerns and has moved to eliminate "trialware" from a range of small business laptops and desktops computers.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>British mining company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rio-tinto-plc-ads/rtp/nys">Rio Tinto plc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rio-tinto-plc-ads/rtp/nys">RTP</a>) is believed to be preparing a $34 billion, or $90 per share, takeover bid for Canadian aluminum company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcan-inc/al/nys">Alcan Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcan-inc/al/nys">AL</a>), reported the <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article2056815.ece "><em>U.K. Times</em></a>.</li>
    <li>According to the <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/FedEx_fails_to_clinch_Safexpress_deal/articleshow/2192820.cms "><em>Economic Times</em></a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FedEx Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FDX</a>) has failed in its attempt to buy out Indian logistics company SafeExpress.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-070710chertoff,1,2055735.story?coll=chi-news-hed&amp;ctrack=1&amp;cset=true "><em>Chicago Tribune</em></a> reported that the U.S. faces an "increased risk" of a terror attack this summer, according to U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-7-11-07/">Newspaper wrap-up 7-11-07: Dell to eliminate trialware in some new computers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-7-11-07/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/937825/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/11/newspaper-wrap-up-7-11-07/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>al</category><category>alcan</category><category>chicago tribune</category><category>ChicagoTribune</category><category>dell</category><category>fdx</category><category>fedex</category><category>financial times</category><category>FinancialTimes</category><category>ft</category><category>homeland security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>liz</category><category>liz claiborne</category><category>LizClaiborne</category><category>london times</category><category>LondonTimes</category><category>michael chertoff</category><category>MichaelChertoff</category><category>newspaper</category><category>paper</category><category>periodical</category><category>rio tinto</category><category>RioTinto</category><category>rtp</category><category>safeexpress</category><category>terror</category><category>terrorism</category><category>terrorist</category><category>trialware</category><category>uk times</category><category>UkTimes</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top Picks 2007:  TechValue indentifies security ID play]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a></p><p><em>Each year <strong>Steven Halpern</strong>, editor of </em><a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/"><em>TheStockAdvisors.com</em></a><em>, surveys the leading financial newsletter advisors asking for their favorite stocks for the coming year. This article is part of his 24th annual </em><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/stock_picks_2007_full_list"><em>Top Picks Report</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><strong><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/mark_mowrey.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Cogent</strong> <strong>Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cogent-inc/cogt/nas">COGT</a>) is a top speculative idea from <strong>Mark Mowrey</strong>, editor of the <a href="http://www.newsletters.forbes.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&amp;Locale=en_US&amp;id=ProductDetailsPage&amp;SiteID=es_764&amp;productID=35427600&amp;pgm=6117300">Prudent Speculator TechValue Report</a>. He explains, "Cogent's identification technology emphasizes the uniqueness of the human fingerprint as the best method for identifying its owner. </p>
<p>"Other potentially more reliable technologies exist, such as retinal, facial, voice, and vascular identification, but none has proved as long-term successful in the field as fingerprint matching. Applications include the obvious, like law enforcement and access restriction, and the not so obvious, such as laptop security and fingerprint-based payment systems. </p>
<p>"Revenue peaked in 2005, the bulk coming from two primary customers: the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the National Electoral Council of Venezuela. Work continues with both agencies, but orders have become less predictable. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Top Picks 2007:  TechValue indentifies security ID play</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/">Top Picks 2007:  TechValue indentifies security ID play</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/721592/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/top-picks-2007-techvalue-indentifies-security-id-play/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>al frank</category><category>AlFrank</category><category>best financial newsletters</category><category>best newsletter advisors</category><category>cogent</category><category>cogt</category><category>defense stocks</category><category>DefenseStocks</category><category>favorite stocks for 2007</category><category>fingerprint ID</category><category>FingerprintId</category><category>homeland security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>john buckingham</category><category>JohnBuckingham</category><category>mark mowrey</category><category>MarkMowrey</category><category>prudent speculator techvalue</category><category>PrudentSpeculatorTechvalue</category><category>security stocks</category><category>SecurityStocks</category><category>top picks for 2007</category><category>top stocks for 2007</category><category>TopPicksFor2007</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Homeland Security crying wolf again?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/01/is-homeland-security-crying-wolf-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/01/is-homeland-security-crying-wolf-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/01/is-homeland-security-crying-wolf-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p>Prior to the 2004 presidential elections, the Department of Homeland Security regularly issued warnings of imminent terrorist attacks. These warnings <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2005/07/hedging-terror.html">often correlated with low poll numbers</a>; they probably scared people, and they certainly cost the government money due to additional police and other protection. But it was never clear to me how real these warnings were so I am not sure whether to be thankful for the benefits of government vigilance or jaded by it because of the false warnings.</p>
<p>Yesterday, the Department of Homeland Security <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/government-warns-of-threat-to-financial/20061130201709990001?cid=403">warned of attacks this month on stock trading and bank web sites</a>. Anonymous sources suggested that a group calling itself "ANHIAR al-Dollar" is calling for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack">Denial of Service</a> attacks "to avenge 'Muslim brothers in the crusaders' Guantanamo prison camp.'" But this warning came with a <strong>special warning label</strong> of its own -- "the threat was unconfirmed and seemed to pose no immediate danger." </p>
<p>The financial community has concluded that Homeland Security is crying wolf again -- with markets showing little or no reaction. Today's warning raises many questions:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>If the threat is not credible why scare people by promoting it?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Why issue the warning without suggesting actions for citizens to take to protect themselves?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>If a group really was serious about taking down our financial systems, would they really advertise it online?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Regardless of whether terrorists or hackers wanted to bring down our financial systems, how vulnerable are these systems?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>If such an attack did happen, what can bank and online trading account holders do to protect themselves?</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Do account holders have any insurance protection in the event of such an attack?</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>Rather than repeatedly crying wolf, it would be great if The Department of Homeland Security could warn and protect the public from <strong>real </strong>attacks.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of </em><a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm, and a </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>Professor of Management at Babson College</em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/01/is-homeland-security-crying-wolf-again/">Is Homeland Security crying wolf again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/government-warns-of-threat-to-financial/20061130201709990001?cid=403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/01/is-homeland-security-crying-wolf-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/710885/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/01/is-homeland-security-crying-wolf-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>homeland security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>terrorist attacks</category><category>TerroristAttacks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbuck, airports, and banned liquids]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/starbuck-airports-and-banned-liquids/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/starbuck-airports-and-banned-liquids/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/starbuck-airports-and-banned-liquids/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_2" alt="waiting for flight, starbucks in hand" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/starbucks_atairport.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />True the line for the average airport gourmet coffee kiosk isn't <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">quite</span> as long on the one for security, but how will Starbucks (<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>) and other airport retailers cope with the <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/traveloutdoors/2003192419_webtravel11.html">in-flight liquids ban</a>? Starbucks partner <span class="body">HMS Host Corp, which places the kiosks in some 150 airports </span><a href="http://www.palmbeachpost.com/business/content/business/epaper/2006/08/11/a1d_airportretail_0811.html">insists it is unconcerned</a>. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/aug2006/pi20060814_563615.htm?campaign_id=rss_null">Duty-free shops</a> also find themselves in the predicament. <br /><br />It's much too soon to assess whether the ban will have any impact on at-airport revenue. Longer waits and recommendations that passengers arrive earlier and earlier for for flights might result in even more beverage demand at airports. As travelers become more and more used to terror alerts, as well as accepting of whatever carry-on restrictions are imposed, these changes will have less of an effect on the economy. <br /><br /><em>Michael Canfield is a private investor, a business and media writer, living in Seattle. He </em><em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/about-the-stock-bloggers-michael-canfield/">doesn't own stock</a> in Starbucks. </em></p>
<p><em>[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerbooktrance/29499248/">Photo</a> courtesy <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/powerbooktrance/">Terry Johnston</a>]</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/starbuck-airports-and-banned-liquids/">Starbuck, airports, and banned liquids</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/starbuck-airports-and-banned-liquids/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/653711/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/14/starbuck-airports-and-banned-liquids/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airlines</category><category>airport security</category><category>AirportSecurity</category><category>homeland security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><category>in flight liquids ban</category><category>InFlightLiquidsBan</category><category>sbux</category><category>starbucks</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE after the bell 08/03/2006: security division profits off homeland security growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/ge-after-the-bell-08-03-2006-security-division-profits-off-home/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/ge-after-the-bell-08-03-2006-security-division-profits-off-home/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/ge-after-the-bell-08-03-2006-security-division-profits-off-home/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p>GE ended the day up 13 cents with a share price of $32.73, the bulk of that increase happening earlier this morning. Part of that jump may be attributed to a very positive Forbes article about GE's increasing profits off America's new security concerns.<br /><br />GE's security division has lead the industry with $15 billion in contract revenue from the Homeland Security Division. That's about 11.5% of the $130 billion the department has handed out in contracts to private companies since 2001. Homeland Security has increased its contracts by tenfold over that period of time, and GE has done well by it. Experts believe this growth in contracts will only increase as the budget for Homeland Security continues to grow, and presumably, so will GE security's profits.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/ge-after-the-bell-08-03-2006-security-division-profits-off-home/">GE after the bell 08/03/2006: security division profits off homeland security growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/2006/08/02/homeland-security-contracts-cx_rm_0803homeland.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/ge-after-the-bell-08-03-2006-security-division-profits-off-home/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/650467/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/ge-after-the-bell-08-03-2006-security-division-profits-off-home/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>forbes</category><category>ge security division</category><category>GeSecurityDivision</category><category>homeland security</category><category>HomelandSecurity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
