It looks like the housing market is coming back, but there's still reason to be careful. In July, home resales had their highest monthly increase in at least a decade. The rush is driven in part by a tax credit that expires on November 30, 2009. The rate of sale grew 7.2%, ahead of expectations.

Last month, sales hit a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.24 million in July -- up from a 4.89 million in June. This is the fourth month in a row in which seasonally adjusted sales increased, and it was the strongest growth rate since August 2007. A Thomson Reuters survey had forecast 5 million, but the reality exceeded that.

Here's some good news. Home prices unexpectedly rose in May according to the Case Shiller index that measures changes in home prices.

Some 13 of 20 metropolitan areas saw the biggest monthly gains. The four highest were Cleveland, San Francisco, Dallas, and Chicago.

Concerning the change in dynamics, David Blitzer, chairman of the committee at Standard & Poor's, which publishes the Case Shiller index, said: "This could be an indication that home price declines are finally stabilizing."

Early estimates of a contraction in the U.K. economy were not enough. First quarter 2009 estimates were revisited, showing a 2.4% fall in gross domestic product from the last quarter of 2008 to 2009. This downward revision made the first three months of the year the worst since people wore skinny ties, hated communism, and bore nicknames like "Buzz."

In the second quarter of 1958, U.K. GDP plummeted 2.6%, though the 2.4% threshold matches the depths hit in 1979. The original 2009 Q1 estimate was -1.9%, according to the Office for National Statistics in London.

Is it 2009-2010 or 1972-1973? If you're paying college tuition this year, it may be hard to tell. Tuition is up only 4.3% for the coming school year, the lowest rate of growth in 37 years, according to a survey of 350 private schools by the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. This is down substantially from the 5.9% increase for the 2008-2009 school year. Of course, this is for tuition only and does not include room and board inflation.

Before celebrating, though, remember that depressed housing prices and constrained financial markets make it tougher to dip into home equity to pay for school (a favorite strategy of the past few years), and layoffs are putting an obvious strain on household finances. So, the bargain in all this may be hard to find, even with financial aid increases of 9.2%.

The Congressional Oversight Panel announced in a report this morning that it feels more bank stress tests are needed, especially if unemployment rates continue to rise. The group believes that the stress tests should be repeated periodically as long as banks continue to hold toxic assets.

The panel used a risk-modeling approach that is described as "reasonable and conservative," but added that it is impossible for an outside party to mirror the loss projections that form the core of the stress tests. The group noted that the "more adverse scenario" assumption for the U.S. unemployment rate in the tests has nearly been met in 2009. The yearly average for the unemployment rate stands at 8.5%, which isn't far from the 8.9% assumed in the first round of stress tests. The group recommended that the "Treasury publicly track the status of its stress test macro-economic assumptions (unemployment, GDP, and housing prices) and repeat the stress test if the adverse scenario assumptions have been exceeded."

This post is part of our feature on Money Losers of 2008. See all 20.

For a second year in a row, American homeowners are among the biggest losers of 2008. In 2007, predictions were that American homeowners would lose over $103 billion. Now at the end of 2008 the number jumped to losses of $2 trillion as the value of homes continue to fall with no end in sight. As job losses increase, even more families will be forced into foreclosure.

Homeowners who bought at the top of the housing bubble between 2005 and 2006, could wait decades for the prices to reach that level again. People who must move for a new job or family crisis find they either have to come up with cash for closing (if they find a willing buyer) or they must walk away from the loan and give the house back to the bank either through foreclosure or through a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.

The housing bubble that started to inflate in 2002 and burst in 2007 drove housing prices way out of the normal range. The normal ranges for housing prices track these measures:

• Income: The house price should not exceed three times your average household income, which was true from 1950 to 2000. In 2006 the average household income was $66,600, so the average home price should have been about $200,000. But during that year the average home price was about $300,000.

This post is part of AOL Money & Finance's Best & Worst in Money 2008 feature.

The year 2008 brought the word "greed" to new levels with major companies going bankrupt thanks to the greed of their top execs, who were more worried about lining their own pockets than about the interests of their customers and shareholders. This greed also helped to fuel the housing bubble that burst and sent home prices falling in what seems like an unending downward spiral. As the financial news continues to worsen, it's hard to pick the biggest money story of the year. We've pulled together our top four picks, and it's up to you to vote on the biggest money story of the year.

Here are our top four picks in alphabetical order:

Collapse of Wall Street
The world hasn't seen so many Wall Street firms go bust since the Great Depression, and we seem to be teetering on the edge of another worldwide depression. Top Wall Street execs pocketed millions, and in some cases, billions of dollars thanks to sales of complex financial instruments that it appears no one truly understood (or if they did understand their toxic natures they perpetrated a huge fraud on the investors who bought them). Now these same executives pocket millions in golden parachutes as they leave the firms they destroyed. And, while they enjoy their millions, investors, customers and employees of these now defunct or badly bruised firms face destroyed careers and/or portfolios.

In the current housing market, it has been hard to find any sort of silver lining, but we do see a little positive news today, as existing home sales in July jumped more than expected, mainly due to lower home prices.

During July, sales of existing homes rose by 3.1%. This was well above the 1.6% that Wall Street was hoping to see, but analysts caution against assuming that this is a sign that the market has finally bottomed out. Despite beating Wall Street estimates, we still have to consider the fact that home sales were over 13% lower than the same period a year ago.

While we can view the July sales figures as promising, we must also take a minute to look at home inventories, and here the picture is not so rosy. Here we see that the number of unsold single family homes is running at all time highs. Currently the market is trying to deal with a total of 4.67 million unsold homes. This is the highest level that we have seen since 1968 when the National Association of Realtors started monitoring the data.

I've lived through the internet bubble (and have some scars) and tried to avoid the real estate bubble (it wasn't easy). But, bubbles have a way of being painful and longlasting.

So, no doubt, the real estate bubble has been painful (may be the worst market for at least the past 50 years). But, could this be a short-run thing?

Perhaps so. In fact, this is the view from the front-cover piece in this week's Barron's [a paid publication]. Actually, there may be the start of a real estate recovery by the end of this year.

This is certainly a controversial stand. Keep in mind that inventory levels are stubbornly high (helped by foreclosures) and housing prices seem to fall further and further. What's more, the credit crunch is still here and there are serious problems with major real estate operators, such as with the implosion of IndyMac Bancorp (NYSE: IMB), as well as the deterioration of Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE).

OK, so why the optimism? Well, if you peel back some of the recent housing data, it appears that things are stabilizing in terms of home sales and inventories. Basically, market forces are making the necessary adjustments.

The housing market can use all the good news it can get, and the latest news out of Southern California is definitely good, as home sales in the month of April reportedly jumped 22% in that part of the state.

California has been hit pretty hard in the recent housing crunch. Of course, the reason why California has been so hard hit is because it was also one of the states that had the best growth during the housing boom.

The flip side of the story is that the rise in home sales was mostly led by bargain hunters who swooped into the market and picked up foreclosed properties. According to the report, 38% of the homes purchased last month had been involved in foreclosure procedures at some point over the past year.

Despite the weak housing market, not everyone is feeling the pain, including Donald Trump who recently made a killing selling a home in Palm Beach for a reported $100 million.

While Trump concedes that the housing market is still weak, he states that he thinks things are about to turn a corner. Trump said that what is most troublesome to him right now is that people are still pretty shy about investing in America, and is what he calls the "saddest part" of all concerning the current economic situation in the country.

Since the American economy is driven so much on oil, Trump admits that there are better investments that you can make by looking abroad.

If you are like me, you are probably getting pretty tired of reading bad housing news day after day, so today it is nice to bring you some good news on the housing market, as mortgage applications rose last week for the first time in three weeks.

According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, the week ended May 2 saw a 15.6% jump in the association's index of mortgage applications. The index takes into account both new purchase as well as refinance loans.

It is a good sign for the housing market, which is entering into its peak buying season. Perhaps this is the moment we have been waiting for, when buyers are finally ready to come back into the market and sweep up some heavily discounted houses. Home prices have been steadily falling for the past year, but signs are starting to point to a possible stabilizing early in 2009.

AP reports that home sales dropped to levels not seen since the George H. W. Bush housing recession in 1991. And home prices are plummeting faster than they have since 1970.

Here are the details: new homes dropped by 8.5% in March to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 526,000 units, the slowest sales pace since October 1991. And the median price of a home sold in March dropped by 13.3% compared to March 2007, the biggest annual price decline since a 14.6% plunge in July 1970.

What the current Bush housing collapse and the earlier one share is the after math of too much capital flowing in to the housing market. Under Bush the elder, the capital flowed in due to the deregulation of the Savings & Loan industry -- resulting in a $250 billion bailout. Under Bush II, the problem was the $1.3 trillion subprime mortgage market which made capital available to people who couldn't afford to pay the mortgage -- after all, 47% of those loans required no documentation of borrower's income.

The Boston Globe interviews Warren Group CEO Timothy Warren whose firm tracks housing in Massachusetts. He suggests that it could take about 10 years before housing prices return to where they were at the peak in 2005.

Warren is a breath of fresh air when it comes to analyzing the housing market. Unlike industry-sponsored studies -- such as this bubbly comment from the National Association of Realtors -- Warren carefully tracks and analyzes data and his observations are not filtered by the need to use public pronouncements to spur real estate transactions.

But Warren's loyalty appears to lie with objective data gathering and analysis, rather than having an ulterior motive. He thinks that the declining number of home sales is worse than the previous housing slump of the early 1990s. He notes that "In the 1990s, we had just two years when the number of sales declined. We are in the fourth year of declining sales in the current slump."

Yesterday I received a great comment from long-time reader Dr. Michael Schneider of barrelomoney.com. He wrote:

Every market has buyers and sellers-- so far it seems the remedies for the housing mess have been directed at helping the banks and homeowners (sellers) and, rightly or wrongly, propping up housing prices. This has the effect of helping those who created the mess or who profited from it while possibly hurting potential buyers-- including 1st time home-buyers who may have to pay higher prices for homes that may still be overpriced.

This may seem like fairly obvious point but it has profound ramifications: it's been completely missed by the people who are supposedly working to solve these problems. Propping up home prices delays the inevitable reversion to something resembling intrinsic value, and prices first time home buyers out of the market.

This was one of the effects of the subprime bubble as well: lax lending prices that made homes available to people with brand new SUVs and double-digit FICO scores made it difficult for people who wanted to do it the right way: work hard, save money, and make a 20% down payment on an affordable home with a 30-year fixed mortgage.

When you think about it like that, you have to wonder why there is so much resistance by supposedly reasonable politicians to just letting the darn prices come back down to earth: it's a zero-sum game, and lower home prices will help just as many people as they hurt.