<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[It's official: Dow hits 10,000 mark]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_up_up_240.jpg" alt="" />Spurred on by strong earnings from JP Morgan Chase &amp; Company and Intel, the Dow punched through <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE5881Q720091014">the 10,000 mark today.</a></p>
<p>The Dow 10,000 is a psychological level. Very often traders pay attention to round numbers like 10,000. Breaking through often kicks off buy stops and that is an added push to the move. Traders also see strong earnings by two giant companies as a positive for the market and often follow along with the momentum.</p>
<p>Recapping, the market was last at 10,000 back in October when it broke that mark on the downside. The index is down 29.4% from its 2007 peak of 14,164.53.</p>
<p>Do you believe that the market will continue to move higher?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/">It's official: Dow hits 10,000 mark</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE5881Q720091014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196052/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/its-official-dow-hits-10-000-mark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dow</category><category>dow 10000</category><category>Dow10000</category><category>featured</category><category>index</category><category>indices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Quick: the next 700 points on the S&amp;P 500, up or down? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-2-american-investor-200cm121808.jpg" alt="" /><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> Executive Editor Keving Depew.</em><br /><br />Quick: the next 700 points on the S&amp;P 500; up or down?<br /><br /> I remember when that question required some thought, around 1200 or so. Regardless, it is interesting to me as someone who also manages some longer-term investment accounts (with time frames exceeding 10 years) that people seem to be more concerned with the direction of the next 100 points than the next 700.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Quick: the next 700 points on the S&amp;P 500, up or down? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/">Quick: the next 700 points on the S&amp;P 500, up or down? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1476022/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>index</category><category>market</category><category>sp</category><category>sp500</category><category>spx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New ETFs focused on revenues]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/11/new-etfs-focused-on-revenues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/11/new-etfs-focused-on-revenues/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/11/new-etfs-focused-on-revenues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p>It seems that every day a new ETF is listed with a new twist on an index. <br /><br />So, for a short history in ETF evolution:<br /><br />1. First came the market-weight indexed ETFs. These were ETFs that benchmarked themselves to indices like the S&amp;P (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-trust-series-1/spy/ase">SPY</a>) or the Nasdaq (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-exchange-traded-fund-trust-powershares-qqq-trust-series-1/qqqq/nas">QQQQ</a>).   <br /><br />2. Then, Jeremy Siegel and the WisdomTree (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wisdomtree-investments-inc/wsdt/nao">WSDT</a>) team introduced dividend -weighted indices. Instead of giving commensurate weight to the largest companies in an index, these ETFs looked at companies with the highest payouts in terms of dividends. These were shortly followed by earnings-weighted indices and the ETFs that track them.   <br /><br />3. Now, we <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/new-etfs-capitalize-revenue-weighted-indexing/story.aspx?guid=%7B4216144F%2DED5B%2D426F%2D92A8%2D3BD81ACCE8CC%7D">read on MarketWatch</a> that a new firm named RevenueShares has listed three separate shares: the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/revenueshares-etf-tr/rwl/nys">RevenueShares Large Cap Fund</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/revenueshares-etf-tr/rwl/nys">RWL</a>), the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/revenueshares-etf-tr/rwk/nys">RevenueShares Mid Cap Fund</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/revenueshares-etf-tr/rwk/nys">RWK</a>), and lastly, you guessed it, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/revenueshares-etf-tr/rwj/nys">RevenueShares Small Cap Fund</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/revenueshares-etf-tr/rwj/nys">RWJ</a>).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/11/new-etfs-focused-on-revenues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New ETFs focused on revenues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/11/new-etfs-focused-on-revenues/">New ETFs focused on revenues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/11/new-etfs-focused-on-revenues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1136408/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/11/new-etfs-focused-on-revenues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>etf</category><category>index</category><category>inthenews</category><category>qqqq</category><category>spy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playing the commodities boom like the pros using ETFs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/playing-the-commodities-boom-like-the-pros-using-etfs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/playing-the-commodities-boom-like-the-pros-using-etfs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/playing-the-commodities-boom-like-the-pros-using-etfs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p>In case you were too busy <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1064997">watching Obama</a> win in Iowa or voyeuring in on <a href="http://showbiz.sky.com/showbiz/article/0,,50001-1299438,00.html">Britney's travails</a>, we're in the midst of what some pundits call a "supercycle" of a commodities bull market.
<p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/newspaper_stock_exchange_266443_l.jpg" alt="" /></em>For more on this supercycle, I recommend reading uber-trader <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Rogers">Jim Rogers' work on commodities</a>. Jim was, along with George Soros, the founder of the Quantum Fund. He has been pretty accurate with his predictions regarding hard assets and the ensuing demand/supply issues that are being exacerbated by demand from India and China. There's an insightful interview with him <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/31835-interview-with-jim-rogers-the-best-place-to-be-is-in-commodities">here</a> that's really good reading.<br /><br /><em>From the interview:</em><strong> </strong>"Nobody has discovered a gigantic oil field for thirty years. That's not a theory; that's a basic fact. In the meantime, demand for oil has been going up for many years. That's not a theory, either; that's a simple fact. Likewise, there has been one lead mine open in the world for the past twenty years, and the last lead smelter was built in the U.S. in 1979. I could continue: the number of acres devoted to wheat farming has been declining for 20 years. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/playing-the-commodities-boom-like-the-pros-using-etfs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playing the commodities boom like the pros using ETFs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/playing-the-commodities-boom-like-the-pros-using-etfs/">Playing the commodities boom like the pros using ETFs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/playing-the-commodities-boom-like-the-pros-using-etfs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1079423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/playing-the-commodities-boom-like-the-pros-using-etfs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodity</category><category>index</category><category>jim rogers</category><category>JimRogers</category><category>RICI</category><category>rja</category><category>RJI</category><category>rjn</category><category>rjz</category><category>Rogers International Commodity Index</category><category>RogersInternationalCommodityIndex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Latest rally: Déjà vu all over again?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><div><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_up_up_240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Some have noted the similarities between the recent run-up in U.S. share prices and the move that took place from March through July. But it's the differences that investors should really be concerned about.<br /></div>
<div> </div>
<div>In both cases, powerful rallies kicked off following mid-month capitulation lows after investors fretted over the fallout from upheaval in credit markets. Each time, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sand-38-p-500-index/%24inx/cmi?tabs=quotesandnews">S&amp;P 500 index</a> managed to tack on about 200 points, or 14%, pushing the benchmark index back towards its March 2000 highs.<br /><br /></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Of course, the first run-up took four months to complete, while the latter occurred in less than half the time. Leaving aside the question of whether the latest move has been a case of "too far, too fast," other comparisons suggest the market's current technical position may, in fact, be more precarious than it was in July, when prices suddenly fell off a cliff.<br /><br /></div>
<div> </div>
<div>For one thing, investors seem to be as or more exuberant now than they were back then, which is the kind of thing that makes most contrarians more than a bit nervous.<br /><br /></div><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Latest rally: Déjà vu all over again?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/">Latest rally: Déjà vu all over again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1009091/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/latest-rally-deja-vu-all-over-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>index</category><category>Michael Panzner</category><category>MichaelPanzner</category><category>rally</category><category>sell off</category><category>SellOff</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Panzner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kiplinger's suggests time tested strategies for building wealth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><a href="http://tradeking.financialblogs.com/post/blog/triple_play.html">The TradeKing blog</a> posted a nice review by Dominic Basulto of the May 2007 cover story of <em>Kiplinger's Personal Finance. </em>that  pointed out some old tried and true investment strategies that are still the best way to build financial wealth over time. </p>
<p>While these strategies are nothing new, they should be reaffirmed from time to time.</p>
<p>Kiplinger's suggests that you consider the following when looking to consistently build your investment value over time:</p>
<p>1.) Get involved in a sector which has been underperforming for a considerable period of time and is showing strong signs of picking up. Consider Warren Buffett's railroads play. Could he be on to something?</p>
<p>2.) Keep a look out for "breakout technologies". I suggest keeping a close watch on solar and artificial intelligence plays as well as RFID. Basulto suggests telecom and biotech.</p>
<p>3.) Higher risk generally provides higher returns. Do ya think? Play the volatility game. This requires nerves of steel and a lightening hand but if you're good, the returns can be immense. It's like betting on the horse that's straining at the gate and sweating before the run. Either that pony will run uncontested or it'll spin circles in the first length. Volatility plays best if you're a heavy duty behind the scenes researcher.</p>
<p>4.) Look for fundamentally strong companies which have floundered under poor management and then wait for a management change. I have watched several people successfully work this angle.</p>
<p>The Kiplinger article seeks to provide insight into the strategies for compounding your money over various time frames. The information provided is valuable and time tested but Kiplinger's makes clear that they suggest a longer time table shall provide you with greater investment security.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/">Kiplinger's suggests time tested strategies for building wealth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://tradeking.financialblogs.com/post/blog/triple_play.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/872944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>build</category><category>compound</category><category>index</category><category>invest</category><category>investing</category><category>Kiplinger</category><category>returns</category><category>start</category><category>volatility</category><category>wealth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shanghai Composite gains 3.94%; will the Dow bounce back?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/28/shanghai-composite-gains-3-94-will-the-dow-bounce-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/28/shanghai-composite-gains-3-94-will-the-dow-bounce-back/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/28/shanghai-composite-gains-3-94-will-the-dow-bounce-back/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a></p>If anyone on Wall Street is up at this hour, they were probably holding their collective breath as the clock ticked toward the open of China's markets today. Would more losses come out of the East? Would the Dow enter a spiral, instead of a "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/27/the-medias-calm-ish-reaction-to-tuesdays-dow-meltdown/">correction</a>"? And at the opening bell, the Shanghai Composite was, indeed, down. But <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/shanghai-shares-rebound-after-opening/20070227214709990001">soon the market rallied</a> and, by the end of the trading day, a nice 3.94% gain had been registered for a close of 2881.07.<br /><br />You can let out your breath, now. Well, maybe not entirely; though China is doing well for the moment, Japan's Nikkei 225 Index fell 2.85%, or 515.80 points, to close at 17,604.12. <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?column=Asia+Markets&amp;siteid=aolpf&amp;dist=aolclick">Markets throughout Asia, in fact, were down</a> in amounts ranging from tiny (Sri Lanka) to severe (the Phillipines), but for Taiwan (up 0.02%) and China.<br /><br />What would Europe do? Evidently, continue along the downward path. At the FTSE's market open, the index fell, and at 3:24 a.m. EST was already down 2.31%. Will the markets keep tumbling, each one in reaction to the other, like so many global dominoes? Or will the U.S. again follow China and bounce back? Either way, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is still awfully close to record territory; I think we have a few percentage points to fiddle with before I'm hitting any panic buttons.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/28/shanghai-composite-gains-3-94-will-the-dow-bounce-back/">Shanghai Composite gains 3.94%; will the Dow bounce back?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/28/shanghai-composite-gains-3-94-will-the-dow-bounce-back/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/842392/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/28/shanghai-composite-gains-3-94-will-the-dow-bounce-back/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>dow drop</category><category>DowDrop</category><category>ftse</category><category>index</category><category>japan</category><category>nikkei</category><category>nyse</category><category>shanghai</category><category>shanghai composite index</category><category>shanghai index</category><category>ShanghaiCompositeIndex</category><category>ShanghaiIndex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Christmas tree price index: a metric whose time is now?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/christmas-tree-price-index-a-metric-whose-time-is-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/christmas-tree-price-index-a-metric-whose-time-is-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/christmas-tree-price-index-a-metric-whose-time-is-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="my husband and son take home our tree"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/jonathan_truman_tree_240.jpg" />On Sunday morning I opened my local newspaper to see a story of how an Oregon family takes <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/search/index.ssf?/base/living/1166041519152960.xml?oregonian?lvlssf&amp;coll=7">hundreds of Pacific Northwest trees to Hollywood</a> every year, where even bad trees go for $150 but their perfect ones can fetch $400 or more. Yesterday <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116648706569353888.html">in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, tales of Christmas trees</a> from Vermont sold in Brooklyn for similarly outrageous prices -- most trees go for $10 to 20 a foot in New York City. The <a href="http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061206/NEWS01/612060313/0/NEWS">same trees in Vermont</a> range from $20 to $55, total.<br /><br />Sunday afternoon my family and I went Christmas tree shopping in our own neighborhood, in Southeast Portland, Ore. We took the wagon and found the price range at the "expensive" Boy Scout lot was $30 to $60, with a fabulously full seven-foot fir going home in the Red Flyer for $39. My four-year-old declared it "perfect" and "beautiful" at first sight and my purchase slid under the $40 quick cash I'd gotten from the ATM.<br /><br />Christmas tree prices don't make the Consumer Price Index, and as far as I know they aren't tracked in anyone's livability indices. But I wonder if that's not one of those secrets of livable places: well-priced local Christmas trees. It's both a measure of economy (there's lots left over for Christmas presents and butter for those Christmas cookies in my world) and livability (I feel happy to have supported a local farmer, a Boy Scout troop, <em>and</em> not broken my bank in the process). It's why even the apartment building windows frame big Oregon firs in my neighborhood. It's why every Subaru we saw on the streets this weekend was bedecked by an eight-foot tree on its way home to someone's living room.<br /><br />Reasonable prices on live Christmas trees help make the season bright in Burlington and in Portland. How do the Christmas tree prices affect <em>your</em> town?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/christmas-tree-price-index-a-metric-whose-time-is-now/">Christmas tree price index: a metric whose time is now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/christmas-tree-price-index-a-metric-whose-time-is-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/722004/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/20/christmas-tree-price-index-a-metric-whose-time-is-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chistmas</category><category>christmas tree</category><category>christmas tree prices</category><category>ChristmasTree</category><category>ChristmasTreePrices</category><category>fir</category><category>holiday</category><category>index</category><category>price index</category><category>PriceIndex</category><category>tree</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New high: are you this optimistic?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/new-high-are-you-this-optimistic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/new-high-are-you-this-optimistic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/new-high-are-you-this-optimistic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a></p>The headlines all sing a siren song of "<a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB116138315422999431.html?mod=googlenews_barrons">Bulls</a>" and "<a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/markets/marketfeatures/10316343.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA">sentimentalists</a>" and "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/23/AR2006102300256.html">optimism</a>." Yet our readers seem more suspicious, looking at every piece of news with a jaded eye. My favorite comments <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/02/all-cramer-needs-now-is-a-pie-in-the-face/#c2309604">come from Mr. noitall</a>, who offers up a mix of value-minded cynicism that I particularly love.<br /><br />With the Dow Jones Industrial Average reaching the new trading high today of 12,125.16 (closing at 12, 116.91), an all-time record yet again, I have to know:<br /><br />Are you an optimist or a cynic? Logical or sentimental? Bull or Bear? What does the record do for you?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/new-high-are-you-this-optimistic/">New high: are you this optimistic?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/23/AR2006102300256.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/new-high-are-you-this-optimistic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/693467/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/23/new-high-are-you-this-optimistic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>djia</category><category>dow</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>index</category><category>indices</category><category>market</category><category>markets</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>washington post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow 12,000: Where to go from here? Five stocks with room to zoom]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mmm/" rel="tag">3M Corporation (MMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/starting_line_240.jpg" alt="" id="vimage_1" />As I start to type this story, it's 2:59 and the DJIA chart I just saw read 11999.97, the tiniest tick shy of yesterday's 12,000 milestone, and 11.76 points off the record close. [By the time I published the market had closed two points above the 12,000 mark.] I know, <em>yawn!</em> Everyone's doing the same story. Dow 12,000, milestones in history. Right?<br /><br />Right, and wrong. Let's do something else here, in this time that seems fraught with cliche and over-valuation. So many Wall Street pundits are saying, <em>watch out! There's a slowdown ahead.</em> And surely, many of these valuations seem high. Too high. But in my opinion, there are just as many stocks that have room to grow.<br /><br />I'm looking at the numbers and I've found five Dow stocks to stay away from, and five that may still have some legs.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Five with room to zoom</span>:<br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>3M Company</strong> (NYSE:<strong>MMM</strong>), $79.20 up 3.66% today; <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/3m-company/mmm/nys/detailedquotes?freq=1">52-week high $88.35</a>; 52-week low $67.05. P/E 17.47. Latest quarter results show it is <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/3m-profit-rises-64-percent-in-3q-sales/n20061020145209990029">up 6% on LCD growth</a>. I think that P/E is nice and low for a company which, despite its industrial roots, is really an innovative company that actually makes things that people want. A good 10% below the 52-week high sounds like lots of room to me. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow 12,000: Where to go from here? Five stocks with room to zoom</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/">Dow 12,000: Where to go from here? Five stocks with room to zoom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/688287/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12,000</category><category>12000</category><category>aig</category><category>altria</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>citibank</category><category>citigroup</category><category>coca-cola</category><category>coke</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>djia</category><category>dow</category><category>dow 12,000</category><category>dow index</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>Dow12,000</category><category>DowIndex</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>ge</category><category>index</category><category>indexes</category><category>indices</category><category>jj</category><category>jnj</category><category>johnson johnson</category><category>JohnsonJohnson</category><category>ko</category><category>mcd</category><category>mcdonald's</category><category>milestone</category><category>milestones</category><category>mo</category><category>pg</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>procter gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>ProcterGamble</category><category>walt disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bracing for tomorrow's CPI report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/13/bracing-for-tomorrows-cpi-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/13/bracing-for-tomorrows-cpi-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/13/bracing-for-tomorrows-cpi-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a></p>Once again equity markets tumbled today, pushing the Dow and the Russell 2000 into the red for the year. For the NASDAQ it was the eighth consecutive day of losses.<br /><br />Causes for today's sell-off are numerous:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Before the bell, the Labor Department reported a 0.3% increase in the May producer price index (core), slightly higher than expected. </li>
    <li>About two thirds of global markets also reported major declines, mostly due to worries regarding rising interest rates in the U.S. choking off consumer demand for exports. </li>
    <li>Yields of short-term to long-term bonds continued their inversion, indicating the market's expectation of an economic slowdown. </li>
    <li>Fear the Fed is going too far with its rate hikes. </li>
</ul>
Declines in oil and gold prices didn't ease investors' concerns.<br /><br />Tomorrow is what the market is really waiting for, the release of the May consumer price index at 8:30 a.m. eastern. The consensus for the CPI and core CPI is 0.2% and 0.3% respectively. If the numbers comes below or within estimate, we can expect the market to start recovering from this month long correction.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/13/bracing-for-tomorrows-cpi-report/">Bracing for tomorrow's CPI report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/13/bracing-for-tomorrows-cpi-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/632926/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/13/bracing-for-tomorrows-cpi-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>by the numbers</category><category>ByTheNumbers</category><category>consumer price inde</category><category>consumer price index</category><category>ConsumerPriceInde</category><category>ConsumerPriceIndex</category><category>cpi</category><category>index</category><category>market</category><category>market wrap-up</category><category>MarketWrap-up</category><category>numbers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:42:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
