<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Fear over Sovereign Debt Rattles European Markets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/fear-over-sovereign-debt-rattles-european-markets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/fear-over-sovereign-debt-rattles-european-markets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/fear-over-sovereign-debt-rattles-european-markets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/trader.jpg" />It started with Dubai. Then it spread to Greece, Now its moving to Spain and Portugal. What is it? It's fear that some European countries will <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a37ab63c-1166-11df-9195-00144feab49a.html">default on their sovereign debt</a>.</p>
<p>The Europe Markit Sovx index, which measures the cost of insuring against default, jumped 100 basis points for the first time, along with heavy buying of credit default swaps (CDS). CDS spreads on Portugal hit record highs, up 17 basis points to 212. Greek swaps rose 7 basis points to 398.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/fear-over-sovereign-debt-rattles-european-markets/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fear over Sovereign Debt Rattles European Markets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/fear-over-sovereign-debt-rattles-european-markets/">Fear over Sovereign Debt Rattles European Markets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a37ab63c-1166-11df-9195-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/fear-over-sovereign-debt-rattles-european-markets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19344740/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/fear-over-sovereign-debt-rattles-european-markets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonds</category><category>indexes</category><category>indices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>sovereign debt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bni/" rel="tag">Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/usb/" rel="tag">U.S. Bancorp (USB)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/berkshire-hathaway-brk.a-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Except for the chosen ones -- CEOs and the like who have outrageous salary and benefit packages -- almost nobody has been able to escape the financial pain in the world today.</p>
<p>'My pal Warren,' Chairman of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a> and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-b/brk.b/nys">BRK.B</a>), who only draws a $100,000 salary, has watched his net worth diminished by billions of dollars as his stock has unraveled like everything else. I last read Buffett had a 31% stake in Berkshire so he understands his shareholders angst, even if he does not feel their pain. The stock has dropped from a 52-week high of $151,650 to yesterday's close of $77,500 for a loss of 49%.<br /></p>
<p>Once again in quarterly SEC filings Berkshire's holdings were released and I could not help but wonder if this great holding company had not become one more giant index fund. There are a lot of quality names in the mix including: <br /></p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">Burlington Northern Santa Fe</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys"> BNI</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">Coca-Cola</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">ConocoPhillips</a> (NYSE; <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">COP</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson and Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">Kraft Foods'A'</a> (: NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter and Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">U.S. Bancorp</a> (: NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">USB</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) </li>
</ul>
<p>The above referenced stocks are all down with the market and there are still more that might be considered fallen angels or turn-around plays within Berkshire's holdings that include:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">Home Depot </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">Lowe's Cos</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">LOW</a>) </li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>In addition to these publicly traded stocks Berkshire holdings include privately held Geico Insurance, See's Candies, Dairy Queen, Florsheim Shoes, and a multitude of others. Since so many stocks have been accumulated over the years I started to view BRK as a stock index and with that in mind did some comparisons between the Standard &amp; Poors 500 and BRK.</p>
<p>The following is a three-year chart that illustrates that buying BRK instead of the index anytime in the last three years would have been beneficial by a 30% margin.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/">Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1378029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AXP</category><category>BNI</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>COP</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>GS</category><category>HD</category><category>indexes</category><category>indexfunds</category><category>JNJ</category><category>KFT</category><category>KO</category><category>LOW</category><category>PG</category><category>recovery</category><category>Sheldon Lber</category><category>SheldonLber</category><category>SP Index</category><category>SpIndex</category><category>USB</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Strength of REITs shows market offers no easy money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/strength-of-reits-shows-market-offers-no-easy-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/strength-of-reits-shows-market-offers-no-easy-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/strength-of-reits-shows-market-offers-no-easy-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p>Given the headlines that have been streaming across every media outlet, most people wouldn't guess that real estate investment trusts (REITs) were relatively strong performers for the first quarter of 2008.<br /><br />But that's exactly what happened. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120708533977381483.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">According</a> (subscription required) to the Wall Street Journal, "a Dow Jones index of U.S. equity REITs posted a 1.4% gain in total return for quarter, out pacing the 9.4% decline in the Standard &amp; Poor's 500-stock index."<br /><br />Self-storage REITs were up 20% for the quarter. Huh? Who would have thought that self-storage would get hot! <br /><br />The point is that it is impossible to beat the market based on following the news. Everyone knew real estate was going to be lousy -- and it was. But markets are a discounting mechanism, and the stocks had already been sold off to reflect the predicted weakness.<br /><br />What will REITs do in the second quarter? I couldn't tell you. But for what it's worth, Ben Stein <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080403.RBENSTEIN03/TPStory/Business">thinks</a> they're a buy, telling investors in a speech that "I'm buying all [the REIT units] I can get my little paws on. These are God's gift to retirees."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/strength-of-reits-shows-market-offers-no-easy-money/">Strength of REITs shows market offers no easy money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/strength-of-reits-shows-market-offers-no-easy-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1158038/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/03/strength-of-reits-shows-market-offers-no-easy-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>indexes</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>reit</category><category>self storage units</category><category>SelfStorageUnits</category><category>subprime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mutual fund underperforming? Blame the shareholders!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/mutual-fund-underperforming-blame-the-shareholders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/mutual-fund-underperforming-blame-the-shareholders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/mutual-fund-underperforming-blame-the-shareholders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a></p><p>According to a study <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/07/business/mutfund/07stra.html">written up in the <em>New York Times</em></a> (subscription required) this week, it isn't lousy management's frequent trading that's responsible for the poor performance of mutual funds. Nope, it's the investors who redeem their shares and force the funds to sell even if they don't want to. The study found that "liquidity-motivated" trades perform poorly compared to trades based on fundamentals. </p>
<p>Mark Hulbert, the author of the piece, suggests that investing in closed-end funds may be a way to avoid this problem, because they generally don't face redemption. In an exchange-traded fund, an investor who wants to sell shares just sells them to another investor. It's just like how selling shares of McDonald's Corp. (NYSE:MCD) would have no impact on the operations of the company. </p>
<p>And yet there's still a problem: Regardless of what any study says, mutual funds simply cannot, on average, outperform passively managed indexes. It's a zero-sum game. Before expenses, the average fund's performance can only be average. After expenses, the average fund is considerably below average. The fact that ETFs are almost always passively managed (rebalanced/adjusted once a year generally) is a large contributor to their outperformance. The fact that they are immune to redemptions by panic-stricken shareholders at precisely the wrong time adds to their value. </p>
<p>The more I study it, the more obvious I think it becomes: ETFs are probably better than traditional mutual funds for most investors.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/mutual-fund-underperforming-blame-the-shareholders/">Mutual fund underperforming? Blame the shareholders!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/07/business/mutfund/07stra.html?ex=1169010000&amp;en=7e5625e83d06895d&amp;ei=5070>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/mutual-fund-underperforming-blame-the-shareholders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/736381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/15/mutual-fund-underperforming-blame-the-shareholders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>closed-end funds</category><category>Closed-endFunds</category><category>ETFs</category><category>exchange-traded funds</category><category>fund performance</category><category>indexes</category><category>Mark Hulbert</category><category>McDonald's</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>shareholders</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Engadget Index up $19.20 on first day 'trading']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/engadget-index-up-19-20-on-first-day-trading/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/engadget-index-up-19-20-on-first-day-trading/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/engadget-index-up-19-20-on-first-day-trading/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/the-engadget-index/" rel="tag">The Engadget Index</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a></p>Wall Street has the DJIA, Silicon Valley, the NASDAQ. Now gadget-happy geeks everywhere (yes, we resemble that remark) have their own benchmark: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/26/the-engadget-index/">The Engadget Index</a>. Announced today, our friends over at Engadget have assembled an assortment of their 50 favorite gadget stocks.<br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="middle" alt="" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/engadget_index1.jpg" /><br /><br />And today, on its first day of "trading," the Engadget Index was up $19.20 to $1552.94. Marked by especially good results from Sony Corporation (ADR) (NYSE:SNE) (up $1.54, or 3.78$, to $42.30) and Sprint Nextel Corporation (NYSE:S) (up $1.18, a whopping 6.66%, to $18.90), Logitech International SA (ADR) (NASDAQ:LOGI) (up $1.15, 4.58%, to $26.27), and Garmin Ltd. (NASDAQ:GRMN) (up $1.96, 3.70%, to $54.87). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NYSE:AMD), up 3.22% to $21.50, is also worth mentioning.<br /><br />Only one stock in the new index was down any noticeable amount: NEC Corporation (ADR) (NASDAQ:NIPNY), down 19 cents or 3.54% to $5.24.<br /><br />All in all, a great first day! Did Engadget have any impact on these stocks? Would you have chosen differently? Head over to Engadget and weigh in.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/engadget-index-up-19-20-on-first-day-trading/">Engadget Index up $19.20 on first day 'trading'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/26/the-engadget-index/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/engadget-index-up-19-20-on-first-day-trading/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/691542/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/26/engadget-index-up-19-20-on-first-day-trading/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advanced micro devices</category><category>AdvancedMicroDevices</category><category>amd</category><category>engadget</category><category>engadget index</category><category>EngadgetIndex</category><category>gadget index</category><category>GadgetIndex</category><category>gadgets</category><category>garmin</category><category>grmn</category><category>indexes</category><category>indices</category><category>logi</category><category>logitech</category><category>nec</category><category>nec corporation</category><category>NecCorporation</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>sprint</category><category>sprint nextel</category><category>SprintNextel</category><category>tei</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow 12,000: Where to go from here? Five stocks with room to zoom]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mmm/" rel="tag">3M Corporation (MMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/starting_line_240.jpg" alt="" id="vimage_1" />As I start to type this story, it's 2:59 and the DJIA chart I just saw read 11999.97, the tiniest tick shy of yesterday's 12,000 milestone, and 11.76 points off the record close. [By the time I published the market had closed two points above the 12,000 mark.] I know, <em>yawn!</em> Everyone's doing the same story. Dow 12,000, milestones in history. Right?<br /><br />Right, and wrong. Let's do something else here, in this time that seems fraught with cliche and over-valuation. So many Wall Street pundits are saying, <em>watch out! There's a slowdown ahead.</em> And surely, many of these valuations seem high. Too high. But in my opinion, there are just as many stocks that have room to grow.<br /><br />I'm looking at the numbers and I've found five Dow stocks to stay away from, and five that may still have some legs.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Five with room to zoom</span>:<br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>3M Company</strong> (NYSE:<strong>MMM</strong>), $79.20 up 3.66% today; <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/3m-company/mmm/nys/detailedquotes?freq=1">52-week high $88.35</a>; 52-week low $67.05. P/E 17.47. Latest quarter results show it is <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/3m-profit-rises-64-percent-in-3q-sales/n20061020145209990029">up 6% on LCD growth</a>. I think that P/E is nice and low for a company which, despite its industrial roots, is really an innovative company that actually makes things that people want. A good 10% below the 52-week high sounds like lots of room to me. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dow 12,000: Where to go from here? Five stocks with room to zoom</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/">Dow 12,000: Where to go from here? Five stocks with room to zoom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/688287/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/20/dow-12-000-where-to-go-from-here-five-stocks-with-room-to-zoom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12,000</category><category>12000</category><category>aig</category><category>altria</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>citibank</category><category>citigroup</category><category>coca-cola</category><category>coke</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>djia</category><category>dow</category><category>dow 12,000</category><category>dow index</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>Dow12,000</category><category>DowIndex</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>ge</category><category>index</category><category>indexes</category><category>indices</category><category>jj</category><category>jnj</category><category>johnson johnson</category><category>JohnsonJohnson</category><category>ko</category><category>mcd</category><category>mcdonald's</category><category>milestone</category><category>milestones</category><category>mo</category><category>pg</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>procter gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>ProcterGamble</category><category>walt disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow, S&amp;P near all-time highs while economy slumps. Why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="indices at 1:06 p.m., september 26, 2006" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/indices_092606_106pm.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />I'm looking at my screen and I rub my eyes. Could it be? On the left-hand column I read a headline, "<a class="bold80" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115924070878573998.html?mod=hps_us_pageone">Slowing Economy Spurs Bond Rally</a>." Over there in the side bar is the cute box that shows the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&amp;P 500. <a href="http://money.aol.com/marketnews">The chart spikes peppily</a>. "11610.55" is the bright number next to DJIA. "1330.60" reads the S&amp;P 500 -- its five-year high. [<strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/marketnews/article">Update</a></strong>: at market close, the S&amp;P 500 had hit a brand-new five-year high of 1336.34, with the DJIA at its 2006 high and second-highest close ever, 16669.39.] The world is full of bright, happy green that seems to belie the sad economic data, the slow in advertising, the doom for American autos.</p>
<p>Could it be true?</p>
<p>It seems as if it is. One <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7BFCD20848-4AF5-44CB-AF4E-A800735D807D%7D&amp;keyword">one side we have the DJIA and the S&amp;P 500</a>. The Dow's all-time high is 11,750 (<strike>140</strike> 90-ish points away), while the all-time closing high is only 11,722 (that's <strike>111.45 </strike>52.61 points away from right now, if you're counting along with me). The S&amp;P is raring to go, as well, creeping ever so slowly up towards its all-time high of 1,552 (although it's still <strike>222</strike> 215 points away, <strike>16.6% </strike>16.1%). Strikingly, the current level is higher than the index has been for five-and-a-half years.</p>
<p>And yet, still, economy <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aHp1L4w7Ql3U&amp;refer=home">slumps</a>, <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,16849-2364029,00.html">slows</a>, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8KCGR800.htm">dips</a>, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&amp;sid=a8L.t6R914z0&amp;refer=canada">weakens</a>. Why are <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/consumer-confidence-rises-factory-index/20060926100409990004?cid=403">consumers so confident</a>, why are investors eagerly buying up stocks, while the rest of the indicators seem to warn them away? I've searched my brain for a creative answer, and can't discover one. What do <em>you </em>think?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/">Dow, S&amp;P near all-time highs while economy slumps. Why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/675180/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>11722</category><category>11750</category><category>all-time high</category><category>all-time highs</category><category>All-timeHigh</category><category>All-timeHighs</category><category>djia</category><category>dow</category><category>dow index</category><category>DowIndex</category><category>economy</category><category>high</category><category>highs</category><category>indexes</category><category>indices</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nasdaq index</category><category>NasdaqIndex</category><category>sandp</category><category>sp</category><category>sp 500</category><category>sp index</category><category>Sp500</category><category>SpIndex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:37:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
