<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Is gold an investment?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/serious-money-is-gold-an-investment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/serious-money-is-gold-an-investment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/serious-money-is-gold-an-investment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><span class="content_of_comment" id="content_of_comment_719489"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/gold-bricks.jpg" alt="" /></span><span class="content_of_comment" id="content_of_comment_719489">The amount of nonsense I come across misleading readers, or simply providing bad advice, makes me cringe. Sometimes our own site presents such information like discussing penny stocks and technical analysis.<br /><br />In general, I distinguish bad advice, misleading or misguided information from that regarding a stock idea that simply did not pan out, of which I have been guilty too -- all of us have hits and misses. However, a post I read on Seeking Alpha promoting gold, with <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/167098-dow-10-000-show-me-the-real-money#comment-719489">suggestions of doom</a> by tailoring the data to fit the theory.<em> </em>The author supported his point by back-testing only ten years to a known low water mark.</span><span class="content_of_comment" id="content_of_comment_719489"></span><span class="content_of_comment" id="content_of_comment_719489"></span><span class="content_of_comment" id="content_of_comment_719489"></span>
<ul> </ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/serious-money-is-gold-an-investment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Is gold an investment?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/serious-money-is-gold-an-investment/">Serious Money: Is gold an investment?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/serious-money-is-gold-an-investment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19200008/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/11/serious-money-is-gold-an-investment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DJIA vs gold</category><category>DjiaVsGold</category><category>dow jones</category><category>dow jones industrial</category><category>DowJones</category><category>DowJonesIndustrial</category><category>featured</category><category>gold</category><category>inflation</category><category>inflation hedges</category><category>inflationfears</category><category>InflationHedges</category><category>Seeking Alpha</category><category>SeekingAlpha</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>weak dollar</category><category>WeakDollar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ninety percent of consumers expect cost squeeze]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/90-of-consumers-expect-cost-squeeze/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/90-of-consumers-expect-cost-squeeze/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/90-of-consumers-expect-cost-squeeze/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img height="199" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/milk_delivery.jpg" width="261" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Things are not working out so well for those at the Fed who deny that inflation exists. After all, its job is to keep the currency strong by putting out brush fires of inflationary expectations before they can become a firestorm of price spike fears. And if current consumers' expectations of inflation are any measure, the Fed is not doing its job.</p>
<p>That's according to the <em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25454502/">Associated Press</a></em>, which reports that 90% of those it polled expect ballooning costs to squeeze them financially over the next half-year. Consumers have less money than they used to -- the median income is down since 2000 from $61,000 to $60,500. And prices have risen -- food has tripled in many cases and gasoline prices are up to around $4.20 a gallon. But the Fed does not see this -- it measures inflation excluding food and fuel -- and has kept rates at 2%.</p>
<p>And with housing in the tank and lenders in trouble, they can't borrow their way to balancing their budgets. Since the Fed is not controlling inflation, people are coping by cutting back. They are driving less, easing off the air conditioning and heating at home and cutting corners elsewhere. Half are curtailing vacation plans; nearly as many are considering buying cars that burn less gas. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/90-of-consumers-expect-cost-squeeze/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ninety percent of consumers expect cost squeeze</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/90-of-consumers-expect-cost-squeeze/">Ninety percent of consumers expect cost squeeze</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/90-of-consumers-expect-cost-squeeze/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1240878/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/30/90-of-consumers-expect-cost-squeeze/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GasolinePrices</category><category>income</category><category>inflation</category><category>inflationfears</category><category>inflationrate</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rising prices</category><category>RisingPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why the dollar is dropping]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-the-dollar-is-dropping/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-the-dollar-is-dropping/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-the-dollar-is-dropping/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dollar-bill.jpg" />Despite Fed Chair Ben Bernanke's comments this week about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/business/05fed.html?em&amp;ex=1212811200&amp;en=af2a40b5057704d3&amp;ei=5087%0A">inflation</a>, the dollar is dropping -- which is fueling <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aoRECGj.irOI&amp;refer=news">higher oil prices</a>. And the reason for that relates to the different strategies of the Fed and European central banks for fighting inflation.<br /></p>
<p>The difference? The Fed talks about inflation but keeps its interest rate at 2%. If Bernanke was serious about fighting inflation, he'd raise rates. Meanwhile, the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/06/business/worldbusiness/06euro.html?ref=business">New York Times</a></em> reports that two European central banks -- which set their rates at 4% (European Central Bank (ECB)) and 5% (Bank of England) -- are talking about raising the rates further because they're "alarmed by soaring prices for food and fuel." The ECB thinks May inflation was 3.6% and it expects a 3.4% price rise for all of 2008.</p>
<p>The dollar has lost 70% of its value since January 2001 -- it's dropped from 92 cents to the Euro down to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aPvNB_JcbeVo&amp;refer=home">$1.56</a>. Now if you're an investor, would you rather get a 4% return or a 2% one? That's the simple choice faced by people trying to decide whether to buy Euros or Dollars. And with the ECB on track to raise interest rates next month, the dollar is likely to fall further behind unless Bernanke puts the Fed Funds rate where his mouth is.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-the-dollar-is-dropping/">Why the dollar is dropping</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-the-dollar-is-dropping/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1217668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/why-the-dollar-is-dropping/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernanke</category><category>dollar</category><category>ecb</category><category>euro</category><category>federa</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>harvard</category><category>harvard university</category><category>harvarduniversity</category><category>inflation</category><category>inflation protected ...</category><category>inflation rate</category><category>inflationfears</category><category>InflationProtected...</category><category>InflationRate</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE after the bell 9/14/06: selling off division doesn't affect stock price]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/ge-after-the-bell-9-14-06-selling-off-division-doesnt-affect-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/ge-after-the-bell-9-14-06-selling-off-division-doesnt-affect-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/ge-after-the-bell-9-14-06-selling-off-division-doesnt-affect-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/snipshot_1262ldw2l8.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />GE ended the day at $34.78, down 6 cents and 0.17%. Reuters points out that fears of inflation are pushing US blue chip stocks down, of which GE is a most prominent member. <br /><br />GE shows signs of beginning to bow to shareholder pressure with its recent <a href="javascript:openNewsMac("/quotes/ge/nys/extRedirect?sym=ge&amp;date=20060914092300&amp;type=news.headlinesview&amp;provider=Howard+Tsung","http://ge.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/ge-sells-unit-for-3-8-billion/")">$3.8 billion sale</a> of its Advanced Materials Unit. GE doesn't seem to be in any spot that it needs the money for, so it is clearly a large sign to investors that GE is trying to focus more strongly on its fundamental sections. Don't look for GE to start selling off its energy and industrial sections anytime soon, but if the price doesn't come up, GE may consider selling off more non-aligned sections.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/ge-after-the-bell-9-14-06-selling-off-division-doesnt-affect-s/">GE after the bell 9/14/06: selling off division doesn't affect stock price</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/ge-after-the-bell-9-14-06-selling-off-division-doesnt-affect-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/669259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/14/ge-after-the-bell-9-14-06-selling-off-division-doesnt-affect-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blue chip stocks</category><category>BlueChipStocks</category><category>GE</category><category>GE advanced materials unit</category><category>GeAdvancedMaterialsUnit</category><category>inflation fears</category><category>InflationFears</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:18:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
