<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/obamapict..jpg" />Social scientists, unlike some journalists, are reluctant to label anything a trend until they've amassed and evaluated a great deal of data often over years. A journalist can always cite a lack of information, or the crush of daily (and shorter) deadlines as a reason his/her news story did not describe reality, but if a social scientist errs in a refereed-article, well let's just say the action is not conducive to career advancement. <br /><br />And that's why many social scientists are reluctant to comment on the impact of Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) run for the U.S. presidency: it's way too early to articulate informed conclusions that are likely to endure. <br /><br />Still, that's not to say that one can't comment on developments that may -- and underscoring "may" -- be indicative of a trend. And along that line, here's what we know about the Obama candidacy regarding voting behavior:<span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/">Young adult vote could surge in 2008, driven by Obama, Internet factors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1112451/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/young-adult-vote-could-surge-in-2008-driven-by-obama-internet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2000 election</category><category>2008 election</category><category>blogs</category><category>Bush</category><category>Clinton</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Gore</category><category>interest groups</category><category>Internet</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>public policy</category><category>Republicans</category><category>social network sites</category><category>survey research</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><category>voting</category><category>voting behavior</category><category>world wide web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As U.S. approaches $1 billion campaign, what can be done to control spending?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/as-u-s-approaches-1-billion-campaign-chorus-reflects-familiar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/as-u-s-approaches-1-billion-campaign-chorus-reflects-familiar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/as-u-s-approaches-1-billion-campaign-chorus-reflects-familiar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p>On Super Tuesday, as the United States approaches <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/the-most-expensive-election-ever/20080205065809990001">its first $1 billion election,</a> the chorus sounds a familiar refrain.   </p>
<p>The conventional wisdom regarding campaign spending -- that the U.S. is spending too much on campaigns, or that certain groups have too much influence -- reminds me of what <a href="http://www.cmgww.com/historic/twain/">Mark Twain</a> said about the the public's attitude toward the weather: "Everybody complains about the weather, but no one ever seems to be able to do something about it."   </p>
<p>While some would argue that campaign spending is not a problem, for the sake of argument let's assume that the conventional wisdom on campaign spending is valid. The next logical question would be, what changes could and should we make to the current campaign spending laws?   </p>
<p><strong>Limits on campaign spending?</strong> The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Congress and regulators can do this, but only up to a degree, as beyond a certain point it violates the First Amendment's free speech right.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/as-u-s-approaches-1-billion-campaign-chorus-reflects-familiar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>As U.S. approaches $1 billion campaign, what can be done to control spending?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/as-u-s-approaches-1-billion-campaign-chorus-reflects-familiar/">As U.S. approaches $1 billion campaign, what can be done to control spending?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/as-u-s-approaches-1-billion-campaign-chorus-reflects-familiar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1107319/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/as-u-s-approaches-1-billion-campaign-chorus-reflects-familiar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>campaign spending</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>interest groups</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lobbying</category><category>Republican Party</category><category>Super Tuesday</category><category>U.S. Presidency</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
