<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft Customers Go to Opera]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/microsoft-customers-go-to-opera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/microsoft-customers-go-to-opera/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/microsoft-customers-go-to-opera/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/operalogo.jpg" />Readers of this space may recall that about two weeks ago I wrote about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/">an intriguing turn of events</a> for Microsoft Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). Pursuant to an agreement with the European Commission, Microsoft has made available to it's new European customers a web page which provides those customers download utilities for a choice of twelve different web browser applications. As I suggested then, It appears that the reign of Windows Internet Explorer may come to a screeching halt.</p>
<p>According to a report from BBC News, a web browsing application known as Opera is knocking Internet Explorer back on it's heels in Europe. Opera Software of Norway states that downloads of it's web browsing software have doubled in some countries since the Microsoft provided selection page came on line. Anywhere from 60% to 75% of the new download requests for Opera have come via the new Microsoft provided service.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/microsoft-customers-go-to-opera/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft Customers Go to Opera</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/microsoft-customers-go-to-opera/">Microsoft Customers Go to Opera</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8574883.stm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/microsoft-customers-go-to-opera/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19405941/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/microsoft-customers-go-to-opera/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>browser choice</category><category>download</category><category>European Commission</category><category>featured</category><category>internet explorer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Opera</category><category>Opera Software</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft and the Browser Wars]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/ie8-logo.jpg" />Instigated by an agreement negotiated between the European   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/Microsoft_and_the_browser_wars'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  Commission (EC) and Microsoft Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), a new browser selection utility has just become available. Although the browser choice software is intended mainly to be distributed through the Windows update system familiar to Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE) users, it is also available online for anyone to access.</p>
<p>It is reported that Microsoft IE currently holds approximately 62% of browser market share. That is a powerful position for the company to be in when considering that web browsers are absolutely essential pieces of software. That is, in part, why the EC put pressure on Microsoft to open up the playing field to lesser known browser utilities. With their demands, European regulators essentially cut Microsoft's exclusive IE umbilical cord in July of 2009.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft and the Browser Wars</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/">Microsoft and the Browser Wars</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8551317.stm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19386405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/07/microsoft-and-the-browser-wars/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>avant</category><category>browser</category><category>firefox</category><category>flock</category><category>Google Chrome</category><category>green</category><category>internet</category><category>internet explorer</category><category>k-meleon</category><category>maxthon</category><category>opera</category><category>safari</category><category>sleipnir</category><category>slimbrowser</category><category>web</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stay Away from Microsoft's Browser, Warns German Government]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/ie-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />The German government recommends <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-16/germany-says-don-t-use-explorer-until-microsoft-patches-flaw.html">using browsers other than Internet Explorer</a> until Microsoft Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) provides a patch to fix a critical security flaw that allowed a cyber attack against Google Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>).</p>
<p class="indent">In a statement posted on its website, Germany's Federal Office for Information Security warned that attacks by hackers "cannot be fully prevented," even if users run Microsoft's browser in safe mode.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stay Away from Microsoft's Browser, Warns German Government</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/">Stay Away from Microsoft's Browser, Warns German Government</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19319907/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/17/stay-away-from-microsofts-browser-warns-german-government/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>browsers</category><category>China</category><category>cyber attacks</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IE</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Google's browser a threat to Microsoft?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/goog-google-logo.jpg" alt="" />The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/technology/02google.html?hp">New York Times</a></em> reports that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc</a></strong>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) will introduce its own browser -- named Chrome -- but will it cost <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) any revenues? Since Microsoft gives away its browser, the answer is no. However, Google's move may force Microsoft to divert resources to upgrade its browser to avoid losing market share.</p>
<p>And Microsoft' still dominates the browser market. The <em>Times </em>reports that Microsoft "still holds 73 percent of the browser market. [Open-source browser] Firefox's [share] has climbed to 19 percent, while <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.'s</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) Safari has 6 percent." And Google's Chrome introduction marks "a shift for Google, which has strongly backed Firefox." </p>
<p>So why is Google doing this? It could be so that as Google develops applications -- such as search, word processing, spreadsheets, presentation and e-mail programs -- designed to run on browsers for PCs and handheld devices it wants to avoid being so dependent on Microsoft. <em>InfoTech</em> reports that a "new feature in the latest beta of Microsoft IE 8 makes it easier for users to block information about their browsing habits, a move which could hamper Google's interests in display advertising." And while Firefox keeps pressure on Microsoft to upgrade its browser, Google has far more resources to threaten Microsoft's share. So Chrome could divert more Microsoft cash and staff.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Google's browser a threat to Microsoft?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/">Is Google's browser a threat to Microsoft?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/technology/02google.html?hp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/is-googles-browser-a-threat-to-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>chrome</category><category>featured</category><category>firefox</category><category>firefox-3</category><category>firefox3</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>internet explorer</category><category>internet explorer 7</category><category>internet explorer 8</category><category>internet explorer mobile</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>InternetExplorer7</category><category>InternetExplorer8</category><category>InternetExplorerMobile</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>safari</category><category>safari 3</category><category>Safari3</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google (GOOG) puts horse into browser race]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) will offer its own internet browser to compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Internet Explorer and the Mozilla Firefox product. </p>
<p>The software may be plagued by the law of unintended consequences, doing more damage to Firefox than to Microsoft. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122029908090487903.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, Google says the "software is designed to make it faster to browse the Web and easier to run applications without downloading software to a computer."</p>
<p>Most PCs come loaded with Internet Explorer as part of Microsoft Windows. That leaves Google with the challenge of getting consumers to download its new browser. Firefox is also software which must be downloaded. Google may end up competing more with Firefox, a product it has supported in the past, than with IE.</p>
<p>Most consumers don't care what browser they use as long as they have access to the internet. Microsoft's largest advantage is that it is part of the PC software package that people use without any thought as to how it might be changed.</p>
<p>Google will end up hurting an ally without doing any damage to its primary rival.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/">Google (GOOG) puts horse into browser race</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122029908090487903.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301593/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/google-goog-puts-horse-into-browser-race/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrome</category><category>Firefox</category><category>GOOG</category><category>google</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's browser upgrade: Bad for ads?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/31/microsofts-browser-upgrade-bad-for-ads/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/31/microsofts-browser-upgrade-bad-for-ads/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/31/microsofts-browser-upgrade-bad-for-ads/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/microsoft_logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />According to this <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/microsofts-ie8-a-worry-for-web-industry/150979">article</a>, advertisers who use the Internet to get their message across may not like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Internet Explorer 8 beta. That's because the software giant is incorporating technology into the browser that will make it harder for data collection that could be used to target ads. In addition, the browser will be able to block some ads entirely, as well as block content from another website from appearing on the current site a user is viewing. The rationale for the latter is that the outside website could be capturing data on the user's habits. </p>
<p>All this adds up, in my mind, to a legitimate fear for advertisers. Look, I'm like anyone else. I don't want a lot of data collection going on. But, there are basically only two ways for companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) to make money off web content: engage a subscription model, or utilize ad platforms to monetize eyeballs. The Internet has proven to be very resistant to subscription models. Sure, some do work to great success. For the most part, however, surfers don't want to have to throw a credit-card number into a form to be able to see content. It just doesn't work. They want unfettered access to sites. If this is to be the case going forward, then highly-targeted ads are going to play an increasing role in the solution to monetization challenges. Web sites aren't like cable channels, which have the dual revenue streams of subscriber fees and ad sales.</p>
<p>And, keep in mind that the companies mentioned above aren't the only ones who rely on targeted ads. How about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)? <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>)? <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>)? They all have major Internet strategies that utilize ad revenues. And let's not forget the incredible irony here. Mr. Softy has its own Internet strategy that needs ads to survive. I guess it's a tough position to be in: the designers want to enhance the attractiveness of Internet Explorer to users by helping them avoid the very thing that powers, in part, shareholder value for the maker of Internet Explorer. A conundrum, to be sure. I personally hope a solution can be found that will allow advertisers to continue selling their wares. I don't find advertising to be evil. I think it's a great industry that serves an important function in the economy. Microsoft had better consider that. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own Disney; positions can change at any time.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/31/microsofts-browser-upgrade-bad-for-ads/">Microsoft's browser upgrade: Bad for ads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/microsofts-ie8-a-worry-for-web-industry/150979>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/31/microsofts-browser-upgrade-bad-for-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1299410/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/31/microsofts-browser-upgrade-bad-for-ads/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>web</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><img width="160" height="NaN" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/blogginggary.jpg" />This Internet is starting to tighten up a bit and I don't like it. Mostly, I'm a little irritated that moves are being made that seek to pigeonhole our options as content producers and seekers. Call me the consummate conspiracy theoretician if you want to, but I say right at the head of this movement is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>). The following scenario components may provide special interest to the fanciers of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). You may also be interested in these tidbits if you hold a chunk of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). <br /><br />About two months ago the online auction proposition was dumped by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) They gave no real explanation as to why they were doing it. They just closed up shop. Now, they have entered into a joint venture regarding a <a href="http://www.revenuesource.com/internet-marketing-articles/16937-yahoo-ebay-turn-out-toolbar.html">Yahoo! search tool for eBay.</a> Now that answers some questions, doesn't it.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/">eBay, Yahoo!, Firefox, Facebook: This ain't good folks.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/945145/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/20/ebay-yahoo-firefox-facebook-this-aint-good-folks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bar</category><category>digital</category><category>eBay</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Firefox</category><category>Google</category><category>images</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Mozilla</category><category>search</category><category>tool</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple launches Safari browser for PC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/apple-launches-safari-browser-for-pc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/apple-launches-safari-browser-for-pc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/apple-launches-safari-browser-for-pc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) will ship a version for its<a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/apple-makes-safari-web-browser-available/n20070612001409990003"> Safari browser</a> that works on the PC, a piece of real estate that has been owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Internet Explorer and is on the Windows operating system.</p>
<p>One analyst <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118158602997331475.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">told</a> (subscription required) The Wall Street Journal that the news was not a big deal: "Overall it was a disappointment," said Gene Munster, an analyst at Piper Jaffray. But, to a large extent, that depends on what Apple's goals are. </p>
<p>The browser serves a number of functions aside from being the PC portal to the Internet. Several new Microsoft versions incorporate the company's search technology, and important part of its competition with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ : <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). If Apple uses eventually uses Google for that function, it could further advance their lead in search. </p>
<p>Windows Internet Explorer also contains other Microsoft products like Window Messenger. Computers with the Safari browser would not have easy access to that.</p>
<p>Apple's initiative may be small, for now, but with Mac sales growing adding a Windows version of its browser further helps Apple to expand into an areas that has been owned by Microsoft and the PC manufacturers.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/apple-launches-safari-browser-for-pc/">Apple launches Safari browser for PC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118158602997331475.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/apple-makes-safari-web-browser-available/n20070612001409990003>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/apple-launches-safari-browser-for-pc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/916077/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/apple-launches-safari-browser-for-pc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Safari</category><category>Windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Microsoft have acquired web browser maker Opera?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/should-microsoft-have-acquired-web-browser-maker-opera/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/should-microsoft-have-acquired-web-browser-maker-opera/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/should-microsoft-have-acquired-web-browser-maker-opera/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/200x.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Microsoft's venerable web browser, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Internet Explorer</a>, has been derided in the web universe for so long that it makes sense for the competition to have snuck in and stolen away some of the software kingpin's marketshare.<br /><br />While Microsoft's IE web browser still has the largest marketshare of any web browser in the world, it has lost quite a few points in recent years to Mozilla's Firefox web browser, which many believe has much better security features, as well as an entire universe of developers that make "extensions" to the actual browser -- letting the customer customize their web experience as only they can.<br /><br />And how about <a href="http://www.opera.com">Opera</a>, the stalwart Finnish company that many think is the best web browser on the planet? Opera used to charge for its web browser but then joined the competition (IE and Firefox) in giving it away for free.  <br /><br />Would Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) have been better served by acquiring Opera a few years ago? By doing so, it would have effectively taken a competitor out of the market, and also offered its millions of Windows users a much better web experience than what they already endure using IE.  Sure, anti-competitive folks might have had a problem with Microsoft buying a web browser maker with a tiny marketshare percentage, but if serving customers the best possible product was the goal, perhaps Microsoft should have bought Opera.<br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 12-21-06]<br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/should-microsoft-have-acquired-web-browser-maker-opera/">Should Microsoft have acquired web browser maker Opera?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://business.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/12/20/2022241.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/should-microsoft-have-acquired-web-browser-maker-opera/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/722958/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/should-microsoft-have-acquired-web-browser-maker-opera/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Opera</category><category>Opera 9</category><category>Opera9</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft releases IE7 with little to no fanfare]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/microsoft-releases-ie7-with-little-to-no-fanfare/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/microsoft-releases-ie7-with-little-to-no-fanfare/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/microsoft-releases-ie7-with-little-to-no-fanfare/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/ie7_logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Finally (finally), the long-awaited <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/microsoft-releases-new-internet-explorer/20061019062609990001">upgrade to Internet Explorer version 7</a> has been officially released by Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT). IE7 -- as it's called -- has been available for quite some time in beta and release candidate status, but it is now official from the world's largest software maker. Although this sounds like a high and mighty event, I actually think it's a complete non-event. <br /><br />The only reason Internet Explorer is even on the radar -- at over 84% marketshare at this time, astoundingly -- is because it ships with every copy of Microsoft Windows. Most of the world's public -- still to this day -- don't know that better, faster and more secure web browsers exist.<br /><br />I personally have not used Microsoft's IE browser in over two years, but of course keep it around for websites that require IE usage. Mozilla's Firefox is superior in just about every possible way when it comes to the customization I need and the features that allow me to complete my work quickly and efficiently. Let me repeat that -- quickly and efficiently. A web browser is only as good as it makes life easy for its users, and by that measure, IE is (and has been) kaput. <br /><br />Now, don't get me wrong, IE7 is a great upgrade with many new enhancements. But with the web browser turning into a main conduit to the outside world for many of us and it being almost the single-biggest piece of software used on most PCs, <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/microsoft-releases-new-internet-explorer/20061019062609990001">IE just doesn't add up</a>. Opera is even miles ahead and has been. Will yo upgrade and use IE7 now that it's "officially released?" I say keep it handy, but there are far better choices.<br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 10-19-06]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/microsoft-releases-ie7-with-little-to-no-fanfare/">Microsoft releases IE7 with little to no fanfare</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/microsoft-releases-new-internet-explorer/n20061019062609990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/microsoft-releases-ie7-with-little-to-no-fanfare/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/687483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/microsoft-releases-ie7-with-little-to-no-fanfare/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IE7</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Insider blogging: Microsoft updating its IE browser (finally)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/03/insider-blogging-microsoft-updating-its-ie-browser-finally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/03/insider-blogging-microsoft-updating-its-ie-browser-finally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/03/insider-blogging-microsoft-updating-its-ie-browser-finally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insider-blogging/" rel="tag">Insider Blogging</a></p><p>It's not the endlessly customizable interface that the open-source-hungry are begging for, but Microsoft's next beta release of its next-gen browser, Internet Explorer 7, will fix problems with some popular features when it comes out some time in August. <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060602-6978.html">Jeremy Reimer from arstechnica notes that the design of previous releases</a> seems "bizarre" and confirms that users won't be able to change the layout -- with&nbsp;"the menu bar being sandwiched between the address bar and the tab bar" -- in Beta 3 <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/chats/transcripts/06_0511_ez_ie.mspx">according to a recent Microsoft chat</a>.</p>
<p>In a bit of rather technical mumbo-jumbo about caching behavior (why you care: it greatly increases bandwidth requirements in the Beta 2 version), developer <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/06/01/613132.aspx">Eric Lawrence explains some of the fixes that will be available on the IEBlog</a>.</p>
<p>Last week, the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/05/26/608255.aspx">developers announced the official name of the new browser</a> would be "IE7+" or "Internet Explorer 7+" rather than tying it to the Vista moniker (as Tony says, " 'The version of IE7 in Vista' doesn't roll off the tongue as easily...")</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/03/insider-blogging-microsoft-updating-its-ie-browser-finally/">Insider blogging: Microsoft updating its IE browser (finally)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 03 Jun 2006 13:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060602-6978.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/03/insider-blogging-microsoft-updating-its-ie-browser-finally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/624634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/03/insider-blogging-microsoft-updating-its-ie-browser-finally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>august</category><category>beta</category><category>beta 3</category><category>Beta3</category><category>ie</category><category>ie7</category><category>ie7 beta</category><category>ie7 beta 3</category><category>Ie7Beta</category><category>Ie7Beta3</category><category>internet explore</category><category>internet explorer</category><category>internet explorer 7</category><category>InternetExplore</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>InternetExplorer7</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 13:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google says Microsoft stealing search with new IE7 browser]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="msn search in ie"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/i37.jpg" />Microsoft's next-next-next gen browser, Internet Explorer7, has a search box in the upper right corner of the browser window. It goes to Google, right? Heh. I was just testingyou. No, it goes straight to MSN's search engine - where, of course, Microsoft gets all the ad revenue.<br /><br/>According to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/01/technology/01google.html?">a <em>New York Times</em>article</a>, Google is complaining about this tactic to both the U.S. Justice Department and the European Commission,insisting that it smacks of Microsoft's infamous anti-competitive practices in the '90s. Currently, MSN has an 11%share of the search market, whereas Google rocks a 49% share. (Yahoo! is at 22%, in case you're keeping track.)<br/><br />None of the previous IE browsers had included default search tools, although Firefox, Opera and Safari haveincluded them (featuring: Google, but offering a drop-down menu) for a while now. Microsoft argues that, after all, auser can <em>change</em> the default search engine (and I'm sure I'm not the only one who realizes the typicalconsumer, won't).<br /><br />I'm not a fan of anti-competitive practices but... who's the monopoly here? Did someonesay something about 49% of the market? That's <em>awfully </em>close to a majority. If the consumers don't like it,there's always Firefox, where Google still reigns supreme.<br /><br />[Image <ahref="http://www.flickr.com/photos/haipunk/104867531/">Haipunk</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/">Google says Microsoft stealing search with new IE7 browser</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 08:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/01/technology/01google.html?>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/613579/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/google-says-microsoft-stealing-search-with-new-ie7-browser/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anticompetitive practices</category><category>AnticompetitivePractices</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>google search</category><category>google vs. microsoft</category><category>GoogleSearch</category><category>GoogleVs.Microsoft</category><category>ie</category><category>ie7</category><category>internet explorer</category><category>internet search</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>InternetSearch</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft vs. google</category><category>MicrosoftVs.Google</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>msn search</category><category>MsnSearch</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search wars</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchWars</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 08:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft looks to reverse IE loses, tests IE7]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/26/microsoft-looks-to-reverse-ie-loses-tests-ie7/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/26/microsoft-looks-to-reverse-ie-loses-tests-ie7/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/26/microsoft-looks-to-reverse-ie-loses-tests-ie7/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p>Microsoft hopes to stop the bleeding.&nbsp; The <em>Washington Post</em>&nbsp; reported today that Microsoft is readyto test its new version of Internet Explorer - IE7.&nbsp; </p>
<p>The <em>Post </em>reported that Microsoft has been slowly losing IE users each year.&nbsp; Last year IE controlled88.6% of Internet Web surfers.&nbsp; That number dropped to 84.7% last month.&nbsp; The big gainer was Firefox.&nbsp;Its use jumped more than three percent from 6.7% to 10%.</p>
<p>You know Microsoft doesn't want to risk any part of its near monopoly.&nbsp; Most people who leave Microsoft'scocoon do so because of safety concerns.&nbsp; IE can be a big target for virus writers and more and more people areconcerned about safety while Web surfing.</p>
<p>Microsoft believes&nbsp;the new version of its Web browser will answer users safety concerns.&nbsp; IE7 willinclude color-coded warnings when users try to access a suspicious Web site.&nbsp; Other new features will allow usersto open several frequently used Web sites at once.&nbsp; Also, you should be able to print Web pages without cuttingoff the right side of the page - I can't wait for that one.&nbsp; Improved search features also will be included.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The final version will be out at the end of the year.&nbsp; If you are a&nbsp;brave sole and want to try it outearly, you can download it at <ahref="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx">http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx</a>.&nbsp;Personally, I'm not an early adopter when it comes to new Microsoft releases.&nbsp; I prefer to let others find thebugs.</p>
<p>I'm sure we all hope Microsoft really does improve safety with this new version.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/26/microsoft-looks-to-reverse-ie-loses-tests-ie7/">Microsoft looks to reverse IE loses, tests IE7</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/25/AR2006042501910.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/26/microsoft-looks-to-reverse-ie-loses-tests-ie7/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/612046/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/26/microsoft-looks-to-reverse-ie-loses-tests-ie7/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>browsers</category><category>IE</category><category>Internet Explorer</category><category>InternetExplorer</category><category>Microsoft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
