<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Some oil stocks for your portofolio from Kiplinger]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/some-oil-stocks-for-your-portofolio-from-kiplinger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/some-oil-stocks-for-your-portofolio-from-kiplinger/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/some-oil-stocks-for-your-portofolio-from-kiplinger/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/oilprices.jpg" />With the economy facing soaring crude oil prices for the past year, consumers and drivers have seen a major impact on their savings. It could seem as though the good old times are over. Gasoline at $4 a gallon is not something we can ignore, and if we take into account that Americans consume nearly 40% of the world's gasoline, you can see where the problems begin. So the surge in oil prices came with an imminent effect on consumers, who had to cut back on their spending.<br /><br />But since we are already in this unpleasant situation, Kiplinger offers some solutions to help investors fight against high oil prices. Kiplinger <a href="http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/picks/archive/2008/pick0613.htm">underlines</a> in this article that one smart move would be to minimize the cost of driving by making some good energy-related investments. <br /><br />Gerry Jordan, manager of Jordan Opportunity, recommends investors invest in oil companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/schlumberger-ltd-netherlands-antilles/slb/nys">Schlumberger Ltd</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/schlumberger-ltd-netherlands-antilles/slb/nys">SLB</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/weatherford-international-ltd/wft/nys">Weatherford International</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/weatherford-international-ltd/wft/nys">WFT</a>), citing strong international business. In addition, Jordan believes that higher crude prices will increase drilling demand. On the other hand, Jordan also loves power companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/calpine-corporation/cpn/nys">Calpine Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/calpine-corporation/cpn/nys">CPN</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reliant-energy-inc-new/rri/nys">Reliant Energy Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reliant-energy-inc-new/rri/nys">RRI</a>) as he anticipates huge power outages across the globe during this year.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/some-oil-stocks-for-your-portofolio-from-kiplinger/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Some oil stocks for your portofolio from Kiplinger</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/some-oil-stocks-for-your-portofolio-from-kiplinger/">Some oil stocks for your portofolio from Kiplinger</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/some-oil-stocks-for-your-portofolio-from-kiplinger/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226560/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/some-oil-stocks-for-your-portofolio-from-kiplinger/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Calpine</category><category>ConocoPhillips</category><category>cop</category><category>cpn</category><category>Ensco International</category><category>EnscoInternational</category><category>esv</category><category>inthenews</category><category>invest</category><category>oil</category><category>Reliant Energ</category><category>ReliantEnerg</category><category>rri</category><category>Schlumberger</category><category>slb</category><category>Weatherford International</category><category>WeatherfordInternational</category><category>wft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliza Popescu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SmartMoney suggestions to avoid the pitfalls of falling oil prices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/smartmoney-suggestions-to-avoid-the-pitfalls-of-falling-oil-pric/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/smartmoney-suggestions-to-avoid-the-pitfalls-of-falling-oil-pric/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/smartmoney-suggestions-to-avoid-the-pitfalls-of-falling-oil-pric/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oil-pipeline.jpg" />With the soaring oil prices, <span id="optspots">oil bulls have been benefiting from nice gains lately but there are some pessimistic signs that this may be about to change. The Fed's comments related to inflation stirred some worries among investors that interest rates could be lifted soon. A boost in interest rates will immediately lead to a stronger dollar, and could (and should) result in </span><span id="optspots">a sell off in crude.<br /><br />Talking about this circumstance, SmartMoney is thinking about the best way to protect ourselves against losing money. As a first step, </span><span id="optspots">SmartMoney <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/stockwatch/index.cfm?story=20080612-playing-peak-oil">suggests that we reduce commodities</a> </span><span id="optspots">and increase our allocation in stocks. To back up this idea, the article cites </span><span id="optspots"> Simeon Hyman, equity strategist of the portfolio advisory group at Lehman Brothers' private investment management unit, who said the company is </span><span id="optspots">currently lighter on commodities and "fully invested" in stocks.<br /><br /></span><span id="optspots"></span><span id="optspots"> David Reilly, director of portfolio strategies at Rydex Investments, is taking into account the possibility of </span><span id="optspots">investing in Japan, which "is the most oil-dependent of all major economies. </span><span id="optspots">Reilly cites companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canon-inc/caj/nys">Canon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canon-inc/caj/nys">CAJ</a>) which could benefit from investors' attention due to declines in crude oil prices.</span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/smartmoney-suggestions-to-avoid-the-pitfalls-of-falling-oil-pric/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SmartMoney suggestions to avoid the pitfalls of falling oil prices</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/smartmoney-suggestions-to-avoid-the-pitfalls-of-falling-oil-pric/">SmartMoney suggestions to avoid the pitfalls of falling oil prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/smartmoney-suggestions-to-avoid-the-pitfalls-of-falling-oil-pric/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1224825/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/smartmoney-suggestions-to-avoid-the-pitfalls-of-falling-oil-pric/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>caj</category><category>Canon</category><category>dug</category><category>inthenews</category><category>invest</category><category>oil</category><category>tm</category><category>Toyota Motor</category><category>ToyotaMotor</category><category>UltraShort Oil Gas ProShares</category><category>UltrashortOilGasProshares</category><category>United States Oil</category><category>UnitedStatesOil</category><category>uso</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliza Popescu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Recoup your losses from your employer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/recoup-your-losses-from-your-employer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/recoup-your-losses-from-your-employer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/recoup-your-losses-from-your-employer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/100dollar.jpg" alt="" />An article in today's <em>Wall Street Journal </em>[subscription required], entitled "<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120355797559081769.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us">Ruling allows workers to sue on 401(k) losses</a>," examines a unanimous ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, upholding the right of workers to sue over losses in their 401(k) retirement-savings accounts in some circumstances.<br /><br />With the stock market showing a lot of volatility and many retirement accounts in the red, employees mind find some solace in this recent ruling. <em>The Journal </em>quoted Gregory Ash, a pension attorney as saying, "Employers -- or whoever they appoint in their stead -- have an established obligation to run retirement plans as `prudent experts' on behalf of participants. Failure to do so can invite litigation."<br /><br />Employers were charged with accusations that employees were offered subpar investment options and were charged prohibitive fees to make changes.<br /><br />Before employees get too excited, the same article cites a minority opinion that may provide the ballast for employers to defend themselves against such claims.<br /><br />Regardless, retirement advocates and investors should be pleased.<br /><br /><em>Zack Miller is the managing editor of <a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/">IsraelNewsletter.com</a> and a former equity analyst for a leading multinational hedge fund.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/recoup-your-losses-from-your-employer/">Recoup your losses from your employer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120355797559081769.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/recoup-your-losses-from-your-employer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1120714/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/recoup-your-losses-from-your-employer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>401k</category><category>inthenews</category><category>invest</category><category>law</category><category>retirement</category><category>ruling</category><category>supreme court</category><category>SupremeCourt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fishing for returns... and coming up empty]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/fishing-for-returns-and-coming-up-empty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/fishing-for-returns-and-coming-up-empty/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/fishing-for-returns-and-coming-up-empty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p>Experienced fishermen know that sometimes the fishing is good -- and sometimes, it ain't.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a4Pi71GH68Z8&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg reports on Mark Fishman</a>, a famed bond trader previously with SAC Capital. His main fund, Sailfish Capital Partners LLC, has lost about half its assets since July because of soured investments and clients pulling money, according to two investors, cited in the article.<br /><br /> Fishman, 47, Sailfish's investment chief, left SAC in March 2005. After losing more than 12% in August, clients pulled about $400 million from Fishman's Multi-Strat fund this month alone, cutting assets to $980 million. Bloomberg cites increased mortgage defaults and credit markets seizing up as two reasons hampering performance at Sailfish.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/15/greenspan-looking-to-make-some-green-in-new-position/">I wrote recently </a>about former Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan, joining up with a leading hedge fund. Maybe Alan's looking to catch a few bond-trading fish to join him.<br /><br /><em><em>Zack Miller is the Managing Editor of <a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/">IsraelNewsletter.com </a>and a former equity analyst for a leading multinational hedge fund.</em></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/fishing-for-returns-and-coming-up-empty/">Fishing for returns... and coming up empty</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/fishing-for-returns-and-coming-up-empty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1089891/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/17/fishing-for-returns-and-coming-up-empty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond</category><category>greenspan</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>invest</category><category>sac</category><category>subprime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investing in 2008: Where's the smart money going?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a></p><img width="228" height="NaN" align="right" alt="prospector" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/panning-for-gold-by-dbking.jpg" />I read a quote in an article recently which stated, "What Wall Street is about is smart guys thinking about ways to make money from dumb ones." That quote is attributed to one John E. Fitzgibbon, the publisher of an online newsletter, in an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/business/31place.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">article from Eric Dash via <span style="font-style: italic;">The New York Times</span></a>. While Mr. Fitzgibbon's remark might validate special investing skill on the part of some smart and timely investors, I take exception to the notion that all those investors who lost money in the markets over the past year are the dumb ones.<br /><br />The question now is, where is the smart money headed?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investing in 2008: Where's the smart money going?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/">Investing in 2008: Where's the smart money going?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/business/31place.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1074678/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/investing-in-2008-wheres-the-smart-money-going/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008</category><category>airlines</category><category>debt</category><category>drilling</category><category>electricity</category><category>expire-images:2008-1-31</category><category>export</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>government contracts</category><category>GovernmentContracts</category><category>import</category><category>infrastructure</category><category>invest</category><category>mining</category><category>ports</category><category>railroad</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>rice</category><category>shipping</category><category>supply-chain</category><category>water</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deciding how much risk to take under current conditions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/deciding-how-much-risk-to-take-under-current-conditions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/deciding-how-much-risk-to-take-under-current-conditions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/deciding-how-much-risk-to-take-under-current-conditions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/define/" rel="tag">Define Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><img alt="chess board game" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/chess-at-244-by-dlkinney.jpg" width="244" align="right" />You currently don't have to ask too many Americans about economic conditions in order to get the impression that at least here at home a majority of people sense that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=economic%20upheaval">economic upheaval</a> is quite underway. The word <em>recession</em> is becoming a bit too commonplace for my taste and I have come across more than a couple references to "the coming pandemic." I myself wouldn't go so far as to predict widespread economic collapse, but I have called the current economic environment a "realignment" and I hold with that assessment.</p>
<p>In light of our volatile economic times I thought it might be a good thing to do a quick piece about <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/03/050203.asp">risk assessment</a>. I have suggested that now is the time to cut risk to the bone; I still hold to that. The theory is that the greater risk you take the more you should be rewarded for taking that risk. My position is that currently our high risk economic environment will not, except in a few scattered cases, provide adequate return for the risks involved. In my opinion the risk curve is temporarily broken and I suggest holding the bulk of your money away from high risk play.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/deciding-how-much-risk-to-take-under-current-conditions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deciding how much risk to take under current conditions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/deciding-how-much-risk-to-take-under-current-conditions/">Deciding how much risk to take under current conditions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/deciding-how-much-risk-to-take-under-current-conditions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/990476/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/deciding-how-much-risk-to-take-under-current-conditions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adjustment</category><category>conditions</category><category>conservative</category><category>debt</category><category>finance</category><category>invest</category><category>market</category><category>personal</category><category>reduce</category><category>risk</category><category>volatile</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options update: Options indicate Elevated risk]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/options-update-options-indicate-elevated-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/options-update-options-indicate-elevated-risk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/options-update-options-indicate-elevated-risk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><br />
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vix/usa"><strong><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></strong>Volatility Index S&amp;P 500 Options</a>-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vix/usa">VIX </a>up 6.30 to 36.97; 10-day average is 26.78</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E-Trade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) put volume &amp; volatility at Panic levels on sell-off. ETFC is recently down $3.28 to $10.60. SBSH said on 8/12 "Disclosure in 10-Q short on substance from our viewpoint. Mgmt provided minimal new information on the composition of its $28 billion mortgage portfolio." <br />ETFC call option volume of 37,882 contracts compares to put volume of 87,399 contracts. ETFC September option implied volatility of 210 is above its 26-week average of 37 according to Track Data, suggesting large price fluctuations. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">Countrywide Financial</a> - (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys"> CFC</a>) put volume &amp; volatility Spike; indicating Crisis. CFC, a home mortgage lender, is recently down $4.18 to $17.13. CFC announced "it has supplemented its funding liquidity position by drawing on an $11.5 billion credit facility." Moody's Investors Services downgraded CFC rating to Baa3. CFC call option volume of 204,765 contracts compares to put volume of 412,286 contracts. CFC September option implied volatility of 210 is above its 26-week average of 56 according to Track Data, indicating larger price fluctuations. <br /></p>
<strong>More <a href="http://cfc.bloggingstocks.com/">Countrywide Financial</a> news<br /><br /></strong><strong>Peter Cohan: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/what-the-mortgage-meltdown-means-to-you/" title="View What the mortgage meltdown means to you on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">What the mortgage meltdown means to you</a><br /><strong>Eric Buscemi: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View George Bailey, meet Angelo Mozilo on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/george-bailey-meet-angelo-mozilo/">George Bailey, meet Angelo Mozilo</a><br /> <strong>Kevin Shult: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/analyst-downgrades-an-cfc-dri-and-rare/" title="View Analyst downgrades: AN, CFC, DRI and RARE on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Analyst downgrades: AN, CFC, DRI and RARE</a><br /><strong>Peter Cohan: </strong><a target="_blank" title="View Countrywide (CFC) meltdown continues on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/countrywides-cfc-meltdown-continues/">Countrywide (CFC) meltdown continues</a><br /><strong>Michael Fowlkes: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/countrywide-financial-cfc-adds-to-subprime-panic/" title="View Countrywide Financial (CFC) adds to subprime panic on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Countrywide Financial (CFC) adds to subprime panic</a><br /> <strong>Peter Cohan: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/could-countrywide-be-put-down/" title="View Could Countrywide Financial (CFC) be put down? on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Could Countrywide Financial (CFC) be put down?</a><br /> <strong>Sheldon Liber: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/buy-on-fear-today-bear-stearns-countrywide-indymac-popular/" title="View Buy on fear today? Bear Stearns (BSC), Countrywide (CFC), IndyMac (IMB), Popular (BPOP), Washington Mutual (WM) on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Buy on fear today? Bear Stearns (BSC), Countrywide (CFC), IndyMac (IMB), Popular (BPOP), Washington Mutual (WM)</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/options-update-options-indicate-elevated-risk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Options update: Options indicate Elevated risk</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/options-update-options-indicate-elevated-risk/">Options update: Options indicate Elevated risk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.law.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/options-update-options-indicate-elevated-risk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/967020/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/16/options-update-options-indicate-elevated-risk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>air purifiers</category><category>AirPurifiers</category><category>bonds</category><category>CFC</category><category>credit facility</category><category>CreditFacility</category><category>crisis</category><category>E-Trade</category><category>electronic</category><category>financial health</category><category>FinancialHealth</category><category>funding liquidity</category><category>FundingLiquidity</category><category>invest</category><category>Law.com</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>panic</category><category>schoool</category><category>Sharper Image Corp</category><category>SharperImageCorp</category><category>stocks</category><category>trade</category><category>trader</category><category>U.S. District Judge</category><category>U.s.DistrictJudge</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Paycheck Challenge: Get what you're worth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p>I encountered a fascinating article at Forbes.com. Writer <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/05/09/graduates-salary-negotiation-lead-careers-cx_tw_0508bizbasics.html?partner=leadership_newsletter">Tara Weiss brings to light</a> the fact that when accepting a new job, recruits should realize that they have a right and even a responsibility to take some initiative in negotiating their pay package. Think of it this way: After all the long hours of processing applications, reviewing resumes, and conducting interviews, if you are the individual who receives the offer for employment, that indicates you have a lot going for you. Don't be undersold. It's not an issue of pride. It's responsible economics plain and simple.</p>
<p>With the hope that you'll read Ms. Weiss's article, I'll take the proposition one step further. I submit to you that once you have become established in a job, don't let a job classification or title restrict you from asking for more. If you're not bound by the terms of a labor agreement through a union or other labor contract, then the sky's the limit, and I'm saying that you should go for it. Every employment situation offers opportunities for advancement and for income increase also. If you don't believe me, let me prove it to you.</p>
<p>The company I work for is historically tight-fisted when it comes to employee compensation. It's not that we don't generate enough profit to justify pay raises, but as a subsidiary of a larger entity that provides the lion's share of our workload, accounting is "manipulated" to push the profit up to the parent company. This is simple to prove when given the fact that, in a responsible business sense, any company that shows the minimal profit we do would be immediately shut down and those capital assets would be put to work elsewhere. This makes it tough for a guy like me to get ahead. I, however, applied a strategy that has performed for me all of my working years, and which is encompassed in the following ideal:</p>
<p><em><strong>I don't work for my employer, I work for me. It's all about my own bottom line.</strong></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Paycheck Challenge: Get what you're worth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/">The Paycheck Challenge: Get what you're worth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 12 May 2007 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/893312/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/12/the-paycheck-challenge-get-what-youre-worth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>best</category><category>company</category><category>compensation</category><category>contract</category><category>earn</category><category>earnings</category><category>employer</category><category>employment</category><category>invest</category><category>negotiate</category><category>pay</category><category>raise</category><category>returns</category><category>strategy</category><category>Tara Weiss</category><category>TaraWeiss</category><category>top</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nine Million Millionaires... and counting.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/nine-million-millionaires-and-counting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/nine-million-millionaires-and-counting/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/nine-million-millionaires-and-counting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/rich_at_gala.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />I like millionaires, I always have and I always will. A report by TNS research has revealed that American millionaire households have increased in number over the last four consecutive years to an astonishing 9.3 million, give or take a few. That's an awful lot of millionaires if you ask me. What does the climbing head count among the well-to-do mean to Joe Average? Well, if you can get beyond the jealousy and resentment long enough to see the forest through the trees, you'll find that it means a lot to us.</p>
<p>Millionaires tend to move a lot of money, which is the life blood of our economy. They buy large homes and furnish them with expensive decor. They own nice cars, often several, give them the best of care, and house them in well-lit, heated garages. Millionaires buy into businesses in pursuit of growing their fortunes. They invest in speculative business ventures and back inventors with good (and not so good) ideas. Millionaires hire people to assist in the routine and mundane tasks in life. Cleaning the pool, cutting the lawn and shopping for groceries are a few of the tasks that can be delegated by throwing a few dollars at them. Millionaires can throw those dollars around and they tend to do just that. "There's more where that came from," chuckle, chuckle, snort. Of course some of the wealthy tend to be very tight-fisted but they're generally easy to pick out. They live lonely lives in snobbish repose, worried that the world shall snatch an extra dollar from them.</p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/time_warner_center_millionaires.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />If you want to find out where the millionaires are, this <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/pf/0704/gallery.Millionaire_Counties/index.html">CNN Money report</a> is a fine place to get started. It lists the top ten counties where millionaires reside. Note that it's a bit California-heavy. Some other states with counties that boast the highest number of millionaires across the country include Illinois, Arizona, Texas, New York and Florida. The list goes on and reveals the fact that more Americans have become dollar-savvy. But what does this mean, bottom line, for our country? In some ways it depends on your perspective. Some folks will tell you that it's an indication that the wealth gap has widened. I laugh at that assertion and claim instead that it means our horizons of opportunity have broadened. I also believe that it's a culmination effect of our maturing 1960's baby boom. There are an awful lot of people out there who have striven long and hard to prove that the American Dream has been more than an unsubstantiated stance on manifest destiny. Today's millionaires are the result of prolonged and intense focus on the principles of true success. This stuff doesn't just happen by itself.</p>
<p>So, please don't be tempted to give into feelings of unfairness. Don't waste your time wondering, "Why them and not me?" Some times it's a simple flip of the cards that determines the outcomes of success, but most often, it's the result of blood-and-guts determination. Let the climbing number of millionaires serve as inspiration to you. Realize that financial security is still well within your grasp. Then, learn their ways, associate with them when you can and truly believe that success knows no boundaries of background, gender, race or class. Roll up your sleeves, pull down your cap and get yourself to the business of leaving self pity for the next guy. You have no time to feel sorry for yourself when you're busy staking out your spot on next years millionaire list.</p>
<p>Oh, and about that money you spend on lottery tickets... a passbook account gives better returns by far.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/nine-million-millionaires-and-counting/">Nine Million Millionaires... and counting.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 May 2007 12:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/nine-million-millionaires-and-counting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/886345/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/nine-million-millionaires-and-counting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America</category><category>equity</category><category>get</category><category>invest</category><category>millionaire</category><category>money</category><category>quick</category><category>rich</category><category>wealthy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 12:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kiplinger's suggests time tested strategies for building wealth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><a href="http://tradeking.financialblogs.com/post/blog/triple_play.html">The TradeKing blog</a> posted a nice review by Dominic Basulto of the May 2007 cover story of <em>Kiplinger's Personal Finance. </em>that  pointed out some old tried and true investment strategies that are still the best way to build financial wealth over time. </p>
<p>While these strategies are nothing new, they should be reaffirmed from time to time.</p>
<p>Kiplinger's suggests that you consider the following when looking to consistently build your investment value over time:</p>
<p>1.) Get involved in a sector which has been underperforming for a considerable period of time and is showing strong signs of picking up. Consider Warren Buffett's railroads play. Could he be on to something?</p>
<p>2.) Keep a look out for "breakout technologies". I suggest keeping a close watch on solar and artificial intelligence plays as well as RFID. Basulto suggests telecom and biotech.</p>
<p>3.) Higher risk generally provides higher returns. Do ya think? Play the volatility game. This requires nerves of steel and a lightening hand but if you're good, the returns can be immense. It's like betting on the horse that's straining at the gate and sweating before the run. Either that pony will run uncontested or it'll spin circles in the first length. Volatility plays best if you're a heavy duty behind the scenes researcher.</p>
<p>4.) Look for fundamentally strong companies which have floundered under poor management and then wait for a management change. I have watched several people successfully work this angle.</p>
<p>The Kiplinger article seeks to provide insight into the strategies for compounding your money over various time frames. The information provided is valuable and time tested but Kiplinger's makes clear that they suggest a longer time table shall provide you with greater investment security.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/">Kiplinger's suggests time tested strategies for building wealth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://tradeking.financialblogs.com/post/blog/triple_play.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/872944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/kiplingers-suggests-time-tested-strategies-for-building-wealth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>build</category><category>compound</category><category>index</category><category>invest</category><category>investing</category><category>Kiplinger</category><category>returns</category><category>start</category><category>volatility</category><category>wealth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update - March 29, 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/option-update-march-29-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/option-update-march-29-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/option-update-march-29-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amgn/" rel="tag">Amgen Inc (AMGN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL "><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></a>The Volatility Index for S&amp;P 500 Options (VIX) is down 0.52 to 14.44.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/louisiana-pacific-corporation/lpx/nys">Louisiana Pacific</a> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/louisiana-pacific-corporation/lpx/nys">LPX</a>) call volume Heavy, volatility Higher on renewed Chatter. LPX is recently up .28 to $20.77. LPX has been frequently mentioned as possibly returning cash to shareholders or as a candidate for private equity LBO bid. LPX had 2006 total revenue of $2.2 billion. LPX has a market cap of $2.1 billion with long term debt of $644 million. LPX call option volume of 6,927 contracts compares to put volume of 164 contracts. LPX April option implied volatility of 32 is above its 26-week average of 29 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price fluctuations. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/houston-wire-and-cable-company/hwcc/nas">Houston Wire &amp; Cable</a> </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/houston-wire-and-cable-company/hwcc/nas">HWCC</a>) volatility Flat; call volume heavy on secondary offering. HWCC offers specialty wire &amp; cable. HWCC is recently up .78 to $27.46. HWCC announced a secondary offering of 5.5 million shares to 6.5 million shares. The price of the offering was set at $25. HWCC has a market cap of $569 million with long term debt of $12 million. HWCC reported 2006 total revenue of $323 million. HWCC call option volume of 2,275 contracts compares to put volume of 23 contracts. HWCC May option implied volatility of 47 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional price risks.</p>
<p>Option volume leaders today are: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/beazer-homes-usa-inc/bzh/nys">Beazer Homes</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/beazer-homes-usa-inc/bzh/nys">BZH</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">Amgen</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">AMGN</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-therapeutics-corporation/uthr/nas">United Therapeutics</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-therapeutics-corporation/uthr/nas">UTHR</a>).</p>
<em>The Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/option-update-march-29-2007/">Option update - March 29, 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/option-update-march-29-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/863025/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/option-update-march-29-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amgen</category><category>Apple Inc</category><category>AppleInc</category><category>Beazer Homes</category><category>BeazerHomes</category><category>invest</category><category>options</category><category>United Therapeutics</category><category>UnitedTherapeutics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Jim Cramer the anointed king of pump and dump?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/is-jim-cramer-the-anointed-king-of-pump-and-dump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/is-jim-cramer-the-anointed-king-of-pump-and-dump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/is-jim-cramer-the-anointed-king-of-pump-and-dump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>I may have mentioned previously that for some odd reason I often have the very daunting privilege of entertaining some deeply intriguing questions. The query put to me today was issued in form similar to this:</p>
<p><em>If I could virtually guarantee you that by following my instructions on when to buy and sell stocks you would reap a profit at least 70% of the time, would you listen to my instructions and follow them? The only catch is you have to be the first one to take action based on my advice.</em> </p>
<p>This question was brought up in reference to Jim Cramer and the tone of the question was not nice. It was implied that something less than honorable might be taking place behind the scenes. I stand in Jim Cramer's defense (as if it's even required).</p>
<p>Although at times he annoys me with his on screen antics, I have never had cause to believe that Jim Cramer's prognostications encompassed anything less than good, solid business analysis, thorough historical trending and conservative (although sometimes very wrong) performance projections. I have never known Mr.Cramer to lie about anything and he backs up every claim he makes with experience and facts. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/is-jim-cramer-the-anointed-king-of-pump-and-dump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Jim Cramer the anointed king of pump and dump?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/is-jim-cramer-the-anointed-king-of-pump-and-dump/">Is Jim Cramer the anointed king of pump and dump?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/is-jim-cramer-the-anointed-king-of-pump-and-dump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/853933/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/is-jim-cramer-the-anointed-king-of-pump-and-dump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>advice</category><category>CBS</category><category>CNN</category><category>Cramer</category><category>FOX</category><category>invest</category><category>investment</category><category>Jim</category><category>Mad</category><category>Money</category><category>NBC</category><category>picks</category><category>stock</category><category>Stop</category><category>Trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McCaw is back with Clearwire]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/mccaw-is-back-with-clearwire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/mccaw-is-back-with-clearwire/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/mccaw-is-back-with-clearwire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mot/" rel="tag">Motorola (MOT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>Craig McCaw, the founder of both McCaw Cellular and Nextel, is taking his new wireless baby, Clearwire Corp, public.<br /><br />Clearwire is building its network based on Wimax technology, similar to Sprint-Nextel Corporation (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">S</a>). Two large shareholders of Clearwire are Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) and Motorola Inc (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">MOT</a>).<br /><br />Clearwire is expected to start trading today and raise $500 million from the IPO. For those who have not heard the buzz, Clearwire is a super broadband wireless network that will seek to compete with wireline boardband providers. It will focus on last mile connectivity.<br /><br />From this Fly's perspective, be careful about jumping into this one. Most McCaw ventures, although they prove to be successful, often take a while to get going and to reach cash flow breakeven.<br /><br />Also, going from low-bandwidth voice functionality to high-bandwidth streaming data is a tough task. It will get there, but may take a while.<br /><br />The deal is expected to be priced between $23 to $25. In volatile markets, you can often wait for a correction in these earlier stage companies and buy them for close to nothing.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/mccaw-is-back-with-clearwire/">McCaw is back with Clearwire</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/mccaw-is-back-with-clearwire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/848344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/mccaw-is-back-with-clearwire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>clearwire</category><category>craig mccaw</category><category>CraigMccaw</category><category>initial public offering</category><category>InitialPublicOffering</category><category>intc</category><category>intel</category><category>invest</category><category>ipo</category><category>mot</category><category>motorola</category><category>nextel</category><category>s</category><category>sprint</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Daily Option Update - January 26, 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/daily-option-update-january-26-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/daily-option-update-january-26-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/daily-option-update-january-26-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif"  alt="" /></a>Volatility Index S&amp;P 500 Options-VIX up 1.19 to 11.16.
<p><strong>Microsoft</strong> <strong>Corp's.</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) February option implied volatility collapsed to 19 after record Q2 revenue of $12.54 billion. Microsoft reported Q2 EPS of 26 cents versus consensus estimates of 23 cents. Q2 revenue rose 6%. Microsoft launches Vista, Office 2007 and exchange Server 2007 on 1/30. Goldman Sachs says "good second quarter and stronger growth ahead." Microsoft February option implied volatility of 17 is below its 26-week average of 22 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price risk.</p>
<p><strong>General Motors'</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) implied volatility was low at 34 going into  the financial delay on its restatement. General Motors will delay its Q4 and full year earnings report, which was expected to be released next week, to again restate financial results. Citigroup has a $24 price target on General Motors. General Motors' overall option implied volatility of 34 is below its 26-week average of 42, according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price fluctuations.</p>
<p>Option volume leaders today were: Amgen (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">AMGN</a>), Apple Computer (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), Nokia (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">NOK</a>), Microsoft and eBay (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>).</p>
<p><em>Note: The Daily Option Update is provided by Options Specialist Paul Foster of <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">theflyonthewall.com</a>.</em></p>
<p><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/daily-option-update-january-26-2007/">Daily Option Update - January 26, 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/daily-option-update-january-26-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/743274/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/daily-option-update-january-26-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amgen</category><category>earnings</category><category>general</category><category>GM</category><category>google</category><category>invest</category><category>investors</category><category>microsoft</category><category>money</category><category>motors</category><category>msft</category><category>nok</category><category>option</category><category>trader</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reveo keeps the big guys on their toes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/reveo-keeps-the-big-guys-on-their-toes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/reveo-keeps-the-big-guys-on-their-toes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/reveo-keeps-the-big-guys-on-their-toes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mmm/" rel="tag">3M Corporation (MMM)</a></p><p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/microscope01blog.jpg" />Reveo is a technology incubator which has proven that they are worth keeping an eye on. At least indirectly, Reveo competes with companies such as IBM (NYSE: IBM) and 3M (NYSE: MMM). To date Reveo holds over 300 patents in the fields of electrochemistry, optics, fuel cells, and advanced materials. This is the kind of company that invents and develops the technologies of which your future shall be built upon.</p>
<p>Reveo invites independent investment and has their portfolio available online. Their mission is to spin off companies based on technologies which Reveo has created and made viable. The growing list of Reveo subsidiaries includes cutting edge technology companies such as: <a href="http://www.reveo.com/technologies.htm?page=tec#">VRex Inc</a>., <a href="http://www.reveo.com/technologies.htm?page=tec#">Chelix Technologies Corp</a>., <a href="http://www.reveo.com/technologies.htm?page=tec#">eVionyx Inc</a>., <a href="http://www.reveo.com/technologies.htm?page=tec#">Xellerion Inc</a>., and <a href="http://www.reveo.com/technologies.htm?page=tec#">PetaComm Inc</a>. These are all companies which are busy punching wide openings into the future. </p>
<p>In addressing the need to provide a solid and focused business platform from which to accomplish their goals, Reveo created the <a href="http://www.reveo.com/strategy.htm">Edison Technology Portfolio (ETP) Strategy.</a> This strategy provides the frame work needed to launch Reveo's subsidiary companies with the ability to immediately exploit marketable technologies with a minimum of administrative tangle. In other words, Reveo spin off companies are able to hit the ground running.</p>
<p>If being up to date with leading edge technologies and the opportunities presented therein is of interest to you, then you owe it to yourself to check this company out. With a successful stable of spin off companies already in hand, it stands to reason that Reveo isn't going to disappear any time soon. I see a wealth of opportunities here... do you?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/reveo-keeps-the-big-guys-on-their-toes/">Reveo keeps the big guys on their toes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/reveo-keeps-the-big-guys-on-their-toes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/727548/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/reveo-keeps-the-big-guys-on-their-toes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3m</category><category>advanced materials</category><category>AdvancedMaterials</category><category>chelix</category><category>electrochemistry</category><category>evionyx</category><category>fuel cells</category><category>FuelCells</category><category>genetic code</category><category>GeneticCode</category><category>ibm</category><category>invest</category><category>optics</category><category>petacomm</category><category>private</category><category>reveo</category><category>vrex</category><category>xellerion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow 15000? Dow 16000? Bulls See Another Record Year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/dow-15000-dow-16000-bulls-see-another-record-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/dow-15000-dow-16000-bulls-see-another-record-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/dow-15000-dow-16000-bulls-see-another-record-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pd/" rel="tag">Phelps Dodge (PD)</a></p><p>The trading year hasn't even started yet and already there's talk of a new record for the<a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/new-sandp-record-cant-be-ruled-out/20070102073409990001"> <strong>S&amp;P 500</strong>.</a> Wachovia Chief Investment Strategist Rod Smith proclaimed to USA Today that "the bull market in stocks is alive and well, and a breakout above the S&amp;P 500's old high is a real possibility this year." In fact, five out of 10 panelists interviewed by the paper predicted that the index would top this year's high. USA Today says there are plenty of reasons to be optimistic ranging from the cheap valuation of big-cap stocks to the interesting historical footnote that the last time that the stock market fell in the third year of a presidential term was 1939. Other newspapers including the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal also reported the bullish sentiment. What amazes me is the disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street. Investors continue to have this nagging feeling -- rightly so -- that the smart money isn't always so smart. A survey by the Association of Individual Investors shows that 36 percent of investors are "bearish" on stocks, according to USA Today. I am not sure whether the bulls or bears will prevail this year. But for now, people are expecting happy days. Markets in Europe and Asia surged today while the U.S. exchanges shut down today because of the death of former President Gerald R. Ford.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/dow-15000-dow-16000-bulls-see-another-record-year/">Dow 15000? Dow 16000? Bulls See Another Record Year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/dow-15000-dow-16000-bulls-see-another-record-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/727991/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/dow-15000-dow-16000-bulls-see-another-record-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Investors</category><category>BearInvestors</category><category>Bullish Investors</category><category>BullishInvestors</category><category>Invest</category><category>investing</category><category>NASDAQ</category><category>NYSE</category><category>Stock MArket</category><category>StockMarket</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investing in second-hand goods: Buy used, buy American]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/investing-in-second-hand-or-buy-used-buy-american/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/investing-in-second-hand-or-buy-used-buy-american/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/investing-in-second-hand-or-buy-used-buy-american/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/skylark.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Stocks aren't the only way to invest some money to make some money. There's a very interesting way I found to invest small amounts of money to make some nice returns. Buying second hand goods for resale can be very lucrative. Here are just a couple examples. </p>
<p>As a (temporarily abstinent) eBay Inc. (NASDAQ: EBAY) user, I learned a dynamic approach to buying and selling that earned me a fair amount of cash. For instance, Buffy the Vampire Slayer collector cards can be purchased regularly on eBay at below market prices. A savvy business person can buy individual cards in pursuit of creating sets. Completed sets can then bring as much as 300% more than the cost of the individual cards. It's a game of patience, but it works. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/investing-in-second-hand-or-buy-used-buy-american/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investing in second-hand goods: Buy used, buy American</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/investing-in-second-hand-or-buy-used-buy-american/">Investing in second-hand goods: Buy used, buy American</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/investing-in-second-hand-or-buy-used-buy-american/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/725845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/investing-in-second-hand-or-buy-used-buy-american/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buick skylark</category><category>BuickSkylark</category><category>buying</category><category>ebay</category><category>gm</category><category>invest</category><category>second hand</category><category>SecondHand</category><category>selling</category><category>used</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[In support of the dividend proposition...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/in-support-of-the-dividend-proposition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/in-support-of-the-dividend-proposition/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/in-support-of-the-dividend-proposition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/logo-chess01.jpg" alt="" />My colleague, Zac Bissonnette, wrote an excellent <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/26/a-rally-of-declining-yields-should-you-care/">post</a>. In his writing, Zac tells some real truths regarding the holding of dividend paying stocks. Being a fan of value stocks and the dividend checks they provide, I couldn't sit by quietly without expressing my opinion. You may file this under: "Oh no, here goes Gary again!"</p>
<p>Dividend paying stocks do have their downside, it's true. The double tax proposition is a tough pill to swallow, so why would anyone accept that? The best explanation I have is that it's a payoff against the reduced level of risk that you gain by buying into a company with a history of providing a balance sheet you can sleep on. <br /></p>
<p>Yes, there's probably far more immediate return available when trading stocks in rapid style but that's a horse race at best and some people just don't have the nerve for that. It's also worth considering that many of the people who hold these value stocks, hold them to hold them ... quite literally. The shares are being saved for the growing kids and will then be available for those kids to sell.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/in-support-of-the-dividend-proposition/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>In support of the dividend proposition...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/in-support-of-the-dividend-proposition/">In support of the dividend proposition...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/in-support-of-the-dividend-proposition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/724842/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/in-support-of-the-dividend-proposition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buy</category><category>dividends</category><category>income</category><category>invest</category><category>money</category><category>retirement</category><category>stocks</category><category>tax</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investing resolutions for a wealthy new year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/27/investing-resolutions-for-a-wealthy-new-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/27/investing-resolutions-for-a-wealthy-new-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/27/investing-resolutions-for-a-wealthy-new-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nflx/" rel="tag">Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="here's to a wealthy new year"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/cheers_library_gala.jpg" />I'm not a fan of making resolutions on January 1; I believe, if something about your life needs to change, it should just change <em>now</em>. And yet, every year, I get caught up in the spirit of the season of new beginnings, and start dreaming about how great I will be when I start doing yoga regularly, eating a green vegetable every day, and sitting down to a family meal together (without TV!) at least once a week.<br /><br />Financial resolutions, however, make ever-so-much sense to coincide with hanging your brand-new calendar. A new year often means a new salary and perhaps a new bouncing baby tax deduction, and is a great time to re-evaluate your investments. But a few commitments stand out as being so brilliantly beneficial and (often) easy that most of us would do well to adopt them:<br /><br /><strong>1. Contribute to your company's 401(k), or an individual IRA. </strong>If your company has a 401(k) plan and you're not contributing, well, get thee to an election form immediately! 401(k) contributions are pre-tax, so for someone in my (average) tax bracket, a $150 monthly contribution only takes about $100 from my paycheck -- an amount roughly equal to the amount of money I would have wasted, was it there in my bank account instead of silently creating wealth for me. If you're already contributing, consider increasing your contribution by a percentage point or two; likely, you'll barely notice it.<br /><br /><strong>2. Evaluate your 401(k) or IRA investing decisions</strong>. I managed the 401(k) plan for my small company about five years ago, and was amazed to find that I was the only one who made <em>any </em>investment choices with my money; every other employee had his or her money sitting in the default option, a money market fund (most yield only a few percentage points a year, often less than inflation). If you have any money in your 401(k), pick <em>something</em>, even if it's a very conservative mutual fund or bond fund.<br /><br />If you've made an election in the past, but your entire retirement portfolio is in one bond fund or (yikes!) 100% invested in your company's stock, take a look at the options and diversify a bit. Ideally, you'd have three or four different funds in your 401(k) or IRA, if you can't invest in individual stocks -- and, even though I haven't always followed this advice, after the Enron saga I'd never invest more than 20% of my portfolio in one stock (yes, especially your employer's stock).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/27/investing-resolutions-for-a-wealthy-new-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investing resolutions for a wealthy new year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/27/investing-resolutions-for-a-wealthy-new-year/">Investing resolutions for a wealthy new year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/27/investing-resolutions-for-a-wealthy-new-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/721060/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/27/investing-resolutions-for-a-wealthy-new-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007</category><category>debt</category><category>finance</category><category>financial resolution</category><category>FinancialResolution</category><category>get out of debt</category><category>GetOutOfDebt</category><category>invest</category><category>investing</category><category>resolution</category><category>resolutions</category><category>save</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Google hype, is it madness, marketing or money?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/22/the-google-hype-is-it-madness-marketing-or-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/22/the-google-hype-is-it-madness-marketing-or-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/22/the-google-hype-is-it-madness-marketing-or-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/logo-google.jpg" />My fellow blogger, Sheldon Liber <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/google-it-is-not-a-company-it-is-a-revolution/#comments">left an invitation</a> for explanations revealing the causes of what I shall term, "The great Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) hype of 2006". I am one of the people who have bought into that hype but it's a hype you can bank on. There seems to still be some confusion as to why Google is found by so many to be so attractive as an investment. Really friends, how do you place a benchmark or limit on such a forward operating company?</p>
<p>Remember as you read this that I'm not your run of the mill financial analyst. I'm not a financial analyst at all. I'm just a guy who has a special knack for getting some insight into what the consumer is probably thinking. So when I write about the magical way in which Google has swept onto the Internet with such great force, it's not about money to me. It's about quality, presentation and consumer confidence among other things.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/22/the-google-hype-is-it-madness-marketing-or-money/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Google hype, is it madness, marketing or money?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/22/the-google-hype-is-it-madness-marketing-or-money/">The Google hype, is it madness, marketing or money?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/22/the-google-hype-is-it-madness-marketing-or-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/723335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/22/the-google-hype-is-it-madness-marketing-or-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>competition</category><category>google</category><category>internet</category><category>invest</category><category>money</category><category>search</category><category>shares</category><category>stock</category><category>value</category><category>yahoo!</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
