It's a volatile market out there, but that's no reason to go and hide in a bomb shelter with all your cash. Sometimes simple trading strategies are the best, and you can do more harm over-thinking your portfolio than you can by following the clear strategy you laid out for yourself months before the May swoon.

Here are three examples of simple investing rules that work in any market that can help you focus on the opportunity right now, and build a portfolio that succeeds no matter what happens on Wall Street:

Most high-yield income investors want an energy component within their portfolio as a long-term cornerstone against inflation. That makes perfect sense, but only if that income vehicle can stand the test of time. It does this by replenishing reserves at a rate higher than those energy assets to the marketplace at whatever the prevailing prices are.

This is the main drawback of owning domestic energy trusts.

A common method for paying dividends from funds that invest outside the U.S. is to pay special dividends composed of short-term and long-term capital gains. The dividend policies of such funds are predicated on the ability of the fund manger to pay out whatever gains can be garnered over the course of a year depending on short-term or long-term holding periods.

Closed-end funds based on China, India and other emerging markets had explosive returns from 2003 to 2007, chalking up greater than 50% returns. But a large portion of those returns were paid out in the form of huge capital gains-based dividends and are reflected in most screening software portals that suggest these funds are still paying out these gorilla-sized dividend yields.

They're not, and the data can be hugely misleading when investors are hunting for big yields through various screening tools.

All common stocks, income trusts, master limited partnerships, REITS and other pass-through entities have what is called a payout ratio. It's a number that essentially says how much of the dividend is paid out from each dollar of net income.

A company like AT&T (T) has a payout ratio of 77%, meaning that the company retains 23 cents of every dollar after dividends are paid out to put back into the business. This is a decent ratio, but something around 50% to 60% is more ideal.

Some closed-end funds pay out what is known as managed distributions as a template for their dividend policy.

What happens here is that the fund, in its attempt to draw investor attention, states that it will pay out a managed distribution that is a percentage of the net asset value (NAV) at the end of each quarter. The idea is stability of income.

Hardly! Most closed-end funds that employ a managed distribution payout policy use 8% as the percentage of NAV they peg the fund to at the end of the quarter.

This is one of those areas that should be treated like poison. When a big, fat, juicy dividend yield is composed in whole or in part by what is termed a return of capital, you want to steer clear.

When a mutual fund or entity pays out a scheduled dividend payment that hasn't been earned by profits or interest income, you can bet that a portion of that dividend will be in the form of a return of capital, which simply means you as an investor are receiving some of your money back as part of the dividend.

Two negative things happen here.

Most closed-end funds trade at a premium or discount to their net asset value (NAV) for various reasons and can offer excellent investment opportunities. Locking in a high-yield payout in a discounted fund can make for some exciting total returns.

Yet some investors buy into a popular closed-end fund that is trading at an enormous premium to its NAV. Why would anyone pay up to 25% for shares of a hot closed-end fund when they could buy that same basket of stocks or bonds from their broker at real market value? It's a bit insane.

This statement may come as a shock to most investors, but if there is a choice to buy a certain index or sector closed-end fund instead of an open-end fund, opt for the closed-end fund.

First of all, with the Dow showing triple-digit point swings on an intra-day basis, you never know when you may want to exit the fund if the market makes a dramatic move up or down. With an open-end mutual fund, you can only sell at the end of the day

In the world of high-yield securities, investors on a quest for the biggest yields are often lured into securities that either they don't understand or are simply tempted beyond their personal discipline to investigate how that yield is being supported.

If you can't identify where the "Yield Power" is that makes the king-size payouts possible, then they should avoid purchasing them.

So how do you know which ones to avoid?

Before you throw up your hands in frustration, hear me out. For just one example, take Pinnacle West (NYSE: PNW). This Arizona company has two divisions: real estate development and an electric utility. Not surprisingly, the stock has really sunk since the spring as investors started fleeing with the intensifying real estate woes; back in April PNW was trading just above $50, and in early August it was down around $37.

Most trend followers would sell this stock too -- who wants to be involved with any real estate development company? As I see it, however, the company has been excessively punished for its real estate division, and it's currently undervalued when one considers its electricity division. Arizona is a hot place with a growing population, and there's only going to be increasing demand for electrical power to cool the homes and offices of all these people. The company may not return to its previous profit levels, but I think investors have overreacted, and we could see this gain several dollars back. When you add some modest growth to a 5.3% dividend, you could find yourself with a nice little profit.

Type of stock: An Arizona company dealing in real estate and electricity.

Price target: If you can get this below $40, I think you'll see it get up to around $45 over the next year. That's a ten percent gain right there, plus a dividend to make it nearly a 15% gain. Plus if you hold long enough, real estate has to come back sometime. That could be at least a few years though, so you'll need to be patient.

The difficult analysis of the credit markets is exactly that: analysis.

In the equity markets, when a company encounters difficult times, it tends to be isolated and somewhat unique to that company. The issues can be quantified and analysis will quickly give the investors the snapshot of the current value the company will have in the market place.

Sometimes there is an article in a newspaper that's so great that it's worth doing a post on just so that more people will see it, and no additional commentary is really necessary. Whitney Tilson's tips for value investors in these weekend's Financial Times is such a piece.

For the uninitiated, Whitney Tilson is one of the great value investing minds of our time. He's also a heck of a good guy: He's one of the founders of Teach For America, and I'm an eager reader of anything that he has to say.

For more information about how to implement the investment strategies discussed in his latest column, I recommend the following books:

You Can Be a Stock Market Genius: Uncover the Secret Hiding Places of Stock Market Profits. If there's an award for the most informative book with a clunky, annoying title, I nominate this Joel Greenblatt masterpiece. It's focused on special situations such as spin-offs and bankruptcy investing, which are both featured in Tilson's list of tips.

Contrarian Investment Strategies: The Next Generation. Whether you like it or not, almost all value investing seems to have a contrarian angle: You're buying stocks that you think the market is pricing inaccurately. David Dreman makes a compelling case for contrarian investing, and shows how you might be able to beat the market.