BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com BloggingStocks http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/feedlogo.gif BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[McCain is not your father's Republican Party nominee]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/mccain-is-not-your-fathers-republican-party-nominee/#commentsFiled under: ,

One of the Democratic Party's worst nightmares regarding the 2008 presidential election is coming to fruition: Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona) will be the Republican Party's nominee.

Some investors / readers may argue that as a moderate, somewhat rebellious Republican and an advocate of the Iraq War, McCain will be a fairly easy candidate for the Democrats to oppose. Well, to borrow one of Vice President Gore's renowned, low-key allusions, Now, I can see you really haven't researched the matter thoroughly.

True, the short-term forces -- issues -- are against McCain. The economy is barely growing, or is already in a recession, and the Iraq War continues with little certainty regarding its outcome or ultimate impact. Further, because there's a Republican in the White House, the American people -- if decades of political science survey research mean anything -- will blame the party in power for not having solved the above problems, and this will take votes away from McCain.

Continue reading McCain is not your father's Republican Party nominee

McCain is not your father's Republican Party nominee originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:35:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>2008 electionattitude toward the candidatebarack obamaBarackObamaClintonfeaturedhillary clintonHillaryClintonissuesJohn McCainMcCainObamaparty identificationparty registrationprimariesprimary seasonRepublican National Conventionrepublican partyRepublicanPartysurvey researchU.S. presidencyvoting behaviorMon, 11 Feb 2008 14:35:00 EST<![CDATA[Some leads for possible undervalued stocks]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/some-leads-for-possible-undervalued-stocks/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/some-leads-for-possible-undervalued-stocks/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/some-leads-for-possible-undervalued-stocks/#commentsFiled under: , , , , ,

The market declines continue and I think the worst is yet to come. Opportunity is pounding at your door and some prudent money shuffling might reward you with some real value buys out there. I've done some stock tip searching to find companies that are being pointed out at as considerably undervalued. I'm providing you the names and links, but you need to do the homework. As always, be certain of the tax ramifications before you move that money around.

Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX) has been identified by more than one analyst as being undervalued. Similar to General Electric (NYSE: GE), it's a matter of perceived value more than a balance sheet issue.

Zac Bissonnette wrote today about the value condition of Adams Golf Inc. (OTCBB: ADGO). You'll probably want to check that one out.

In the energy sector, Harvest Natural Resources (NYSE: HNR) is being pointed at as undervalued. Activity is picking up slightly on that name today. It might be a nice time to jump in. Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) is also being mentioned as currently undervalued, although I can't imagine why.

Continue reading Some leads for possible undervalued stocks

Some leads for possible undervalued stocks originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:46:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>bargainbig losersBigLoserschevroncvxdeflationgegeneral electricGeneralElectricissuesreinvestsbuxstarbucksstocksundervalueundervaluedvaluevalue stocksValueStocksTue, 12 Jun 2007 13:46:00 EST