<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Does Kindle make Amazon a good investment idea?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/amzn-kindle.jpg" />There's been some news on the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) Kindle, the company's electronic substitute for real paper books. According to this <a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/breaking-news/on/?story=ON-20090610-000692-1424">source</a>, everything is coming along fine for the product from a statistical point of view. An estimate of Kindle sales from Citigroup Global Markets puts the number of units sold last year at 500,000. By 2010, it's said that the Kindle may lead to $1.2 billion of derivative sales. I was surprised to learn that this sales number would possibly represent 4% of Amazon's top line. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Does Kindle make Amazon a good investment idea?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/">Does Kindle make Amazon a good investment idea?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19065872/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/12/does-kindle-make-amazon-a-good-investment-idea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>book</category><category>Citigroup Global Markets</category><category>ebook</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Kindle</category><category>publishing</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>tom taulli</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon had a great Q4, but don't buy just yet ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/amazon-had-a-great-q4-but-dont-buy-just-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/amazon-had-a-great-q4-but-dont-buy-just-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/amazon-had-a-great-q4-but-dont-buy-just-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas"> </a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/amzn-amazon.com-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>), whose competitors include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>), is up today after the online retailer released its Q4 numbers yesterday after the bell. And when I say "up", I mean amazingly up. The stock was in the green by well over 17% at the time of this writing. According to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/stocks-in-the-news-amzn-pg-xom-dna-hon-dell-pfe/">Stocks in the News</a>, both revenue and net income beat Wall Street's view. Sales rose 18%, and net income came in at $0.52 per share versus expectations of $0.39 per share. I'd say that was a little better than consensus, wouldn't you?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/amazon-had-a-great-q4-but-dont-buy-just-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Amazon had a great Q4, but don't buy just yet </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/amazon-had-a-great-q4-but-dont-buy-just-yet/">Amazon had a great Q4, but don't buy just yet </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/stocks-in-the-news-amzn-pg-xom-dna-hon-dell-pfe/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/amazoncom-announces-fourth-quarter-sales/rfid180274172>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/amazon-had-a-great-q4-but-dont-buy-just-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445872/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/amazon-had-a-great-q4-but-dont-buy-just-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>BKS</category><category>ebay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><category>Kindle</category><category>online retail</category><category>OnlineRetail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-6-billionaires-200cm121808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our feature on <strong><a href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/money-losers">Money Losers of 2008</a></strong>. See all 20.</em></p>
<p>There's no doubt about it -- times are tough. People are struggling to find work and to pay the bills as the value of their homes and savings dwindle. The poor get poorer, and the rich get richer. </p>
<p>Or do they? It's all relative, of course, but world's billionaires have been taking some big hits too. We take a look at <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/money-losers-of-2008-most-of-sheldon-adelsons-fortune-erased-b/">Sheldon Adelson</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-kirk-kerkorian-takes-hits-from-mgm-and-for/">Kirk Kerkorian</a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-falling-demand-for-steel-melts-lakshmi-mi/">Lakshmi Mittal</a> in their own separate posts, but here are some other billionaires who have lost billions this year (courtesy of <em><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/16/billionaires-adelson-casino-biz-billies-cz_dg_1216biggestlosers.html">Forbes</a></em> and <a href="http://businesssheet.alleyinsider.com/loser"><em>Business Sheet</em></a>).</p>
<ul>
    <li>Brothers <strong>Anil</strong> and <strong>Mukesh Ambani</strong> of India's private conglomerate Reliance lost $32.5 billion and $28.2 billion, respectively. </li>
    <li><strong>Warren Buffett</strong>, the Sage of Omaha, lost $16.5 billion. Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) are down about 32% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) founders <strong>Bill Gates</strong> and <strong>Paul Allen</strong> lost $12.3 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively, while CEO <strong>Steve Balmer</strong> lost $6.5 billion. Shares of Microsoft are down 46% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><strong>Larry Page</strong> and <strong>Sergey Brin</strong>, cofounders of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), lost $11.9 billion and $11.7 billion, respectively, and CEO <strong>Eric Schmidt</strong> lost $3.8 billion. The share price of Google has fallen 55% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li><strong>Larry Ellison</strong>, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>), lost $8.2 billion. Shares of Oracle are down 21% since the beginning of the year. </li>
    <li>Media maven <strong>Sumner Redstone</strong> lost $7.2 billion. Shares of his private investment firm National Amusements fell 70% this year. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/">Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1403111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/24/money-losers-of-2008-billionaires-who-lost-billions-this-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AIG</category><category>Amazon</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Anil Ambani</category><category>Apple</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>bilionaires</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BX</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>Carnival</category><category>CCL</category><category>Charles Ergen</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>Clemmie Dixon Spangler</category><category>Dan Duncan</category><category>DELL</category><category>DISH</category><category>Dish Network</category><category>eBay</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>EPD</category><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>Ernest Randy</category><category>Ernest Stempel</category><category>featured</category><category>Garmin</category><category>Gary Burrell</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>GRMN</category><category>Hank Greenberg</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>Larry Ellison</category><category>Larry Page</category><category>Leslie Gonda</category><category>Michael Dell</category><category>Micky Arison</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Min Kao</category><category>Money Losers 2008</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Mukeshi Ambani</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Oleg Deripaska</category><category>Oracle</category><category>ORCL</category><category>Paul Allen</category><category>Pierre Omidyar</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Sanford Weill</category><category>Sears</category><category>Sergey Brin</category><category>SHLD</category><category>Stephen Schwarzman</category><category>Steve Balmer</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steve Wynn</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>Wachovia</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WB</category><category>WYNN</category><category>Wynn Resorts</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Best CEO for troubled times]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-best-ceo-for-troubled-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-best-ceo-for-troubled-times/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-best-ceo-for-troubled-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/best-worst-200x267-best-ceo.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature.</em></p>
<p>In these troubled times, there is only one CEO who operates with the best interests of investors in mind. Of course, that executive is Warren Buffett.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/articles/01/071801.asp?viewed=1">Investopedia</a> notes, investing $100,000 with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) in 1965, the year Buffett took over the company would be worth nearly $30 million by 2005. "By comparison, $10,000 in the S&amp;P 500 would have grown to only about $500,000," the site notes as if that return was just awful.</p>
<p>Buffett's successes are legendary. His missteps are few. The Oracle of Omaha is on the right side of many issues of interest to investors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-best-ceo-for-troubled-times/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Best CEO for troubled times</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-best-ceo-for-troubled-times/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Best CEO for troubled times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-best-ceo-for-troubled-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1388694/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-best-ceo-for-troubled-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>featured</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Kenneth Lewis</category><category>Lee Scott</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cheap Stocks: Amazon.com]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><em><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/cheap-stocks-amazon-com-200cs112608.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />This post is part of a series featuring bargain stocks that are worth a look now. See more <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/cheap-stocks">Cheap Stocks</a></strong>.</em></p>
<p>In my opinion, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) has two major fundamental advantages. First, we're talking about a dot-com company that survived the dot-com bubble. This is an impressive achievement, on par with Julia Louis-Dreyfus finding success with a second sitcom after <em>Seinfeld</em>.</p>
<p>Second, I caught a bit of <em>Oprah</em> recently when I was home sick with a head cold. Her special guest was Amazon chief Jeff Bezos, and the topic of the day was how much Oprah loves the Kindle reader. Not only did everybody in the audience get a free Kindle, but Ms. Winfrey actually bellowed, "Kiiiinnnnnnnnn-<em>dullllllll</em>!" ("Thank you," stammered Bezos, no doubt overwhelmed by her all-powerful stamp of approval.)</p>
<p>Oprah aside, the key to Amazon's survival so far has been its willingness to adapt. What was once a humble online bookstore is now the internet equivalent of a general store -- on today's Amazon.com, you can pick up a new motherboard for your PC, a pair of winter boots, and a box of popcorn in one fell swoop. The company offers a slew of familiar brand names, which should make the site a popular stop for holiday shopping.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cheap Stocks: Amazon.com</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/">Cheap Stocks: Amazon.com</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1373345/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon.com</category><category>amzn</category><category>cheap stocks</category><category>dot-com</category><category>eBay</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>kindle</category><category>oprah</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon (AMZN) hits new low on bleak holiday outlook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/amazon-com-hits-new-year-low-on-bleak-holiday-retail-expectation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/amazon-com-hits-new-year-low-on-bleak-holiday-retail-expectation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/amazon-com-hits-new-year-low-on-bleak-holiday-retail-expectation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/amzn.jpg" alt="" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) hit a 52-week low yesterday, a week after the online retailer saw a previous year low. Worries about this year's retail holiday shopping season have <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/11/18/ap5710872.html">investors fleeing like rats on a sinking ship</a>. Analyst Matt Nemer with Thomas Weisel lowered his Q4 earnings estimate on the retailer from $0.44 per share to $0.39 per share, while Barclays analyst Douglas Ammuth indicated that Q4 profit margins could shrink as price cuts go into effect.<br /><br />Still, Amazon.com has one of the best chances to weather the consumer spending slowdown starting, well, yesterday. Almost everyone I know is already shopping for the holidays, and many are shopping online and are definitely searching out bargains. While the management of companies that run shopping malls in my area are considering bankruptcy, standalone retailers with strong brands and good customer perception appear to be doing fine. I'm left wondering how long that can last, though.<br /><br />Amazon's shares have come back from the stratosphere and have settled into what could be considered a normal range. The company is making money, making profits and is very strong in almost every area in which it operates. It's the world's largest online-only retailer and unlike many other retailers, I've never seen the company say that it makes a huge percentage of its profit in the end-of-year holiday shopping season. All things considered, my guess is that Amazon.com will do fine this season. Not stupendous, but fine.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/amazon-com-hits-new-year-low-on-bleak-holiday-retail-expectation/">Amazon (AMZN) hits new low on bleak holiday outlook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/11/18/ap5710872.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/amazon-com-hits-new-year-low-on-bleak-holiday-retail-expectation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1376089/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/amazon-com-hits-new-year-low-on-bleak-holiday-retail-expectation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon retail</category><category>Amazon shares</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AmazonRetail</category><category>AmazonShares</category><category>AMZN</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon's Kindle continues to attract book titles]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/amazons-kindle-continues-to-attract-book-titles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/amazons-kindle-continues-to-attract-book-titles/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/amazons-kindle-continues-to-attract-book-titles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/jblyberg/2073131769/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/kindle.jpg"  alt="" /></a>I've got to be honest, I wasn't so sure that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) Kindle device would be a hit. But, according to <em><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9107BHG0.htm">BusinessWeek</a></em>, it seems like it's doing okay. Kindle, which is a reading platform for e-books, actually experienced sell-outs after it was launched last fall. And now, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) Simon &amp; Schuster has upped its support of the platform by increasing the number of titles from its portfolio to be sold on Kindle. How does 5,000 more titles from Simon &amp; Schuster sound?</p>
<p>Just great, I'm sure <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/18/amazon-com-amzn-ceos-high-on-kindle/">Jeff Bezos</a> would say. And who can blame him? It looks like people are really taking to Kindle, and although I don't think reading books for pleasure in such an electronic manner will ever come remotely close to challenging printed tomes, I know it's still important for Amazon to have a strategy in this arena. And like I mentioned at the beginning, the fact that Kindle seems to have had a strong start is very impressive. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/amazons-kindle-continues-to-attract-book-titles/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Amazon's Kindle continues to attract book titles</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/amazons-kindle-continues-to-attract-book-titles/">Amazon's Kindle continues to attract book titles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9107BHG0.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/amazons-kindle-continues-to-attract-book-titles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1213241/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/amazons-kindle-continues-to-attract-book-titles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>book industry</category><category>BookIndustry</category><category>CBS</category><category>e-book</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><category>Kindle</category><category>Simon Schuster</category><category>SimonSchuster</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon outlook disappoints investors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/amazon-outlook-disappoints-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/amazon-outlook-disappoints-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/amazon-outlook-disappoints-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/amzn-amazon.com-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) said first quarter profit rose 30% driven by strong sales across the board. .<br /><br />Amazon shares slumped in after-hours <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a5zT.caCZcqM&amp;refer=home">trading after the company lowered its operating income forecast for the year</a>. <br /><br />Net income at Amazon rose to $143 million in the first quarter, or 34 cents per share, from $111 million, 26 cents, a year earlier. Sales increased 37% to $4.13 billion. The results beat the views of Wall Street analysts who had expected a profit of 32 cents on revenue of $4.08 billion.<br /><br />Amazon expects second quarter sales to be between $3.875 billion and $4.075 billion on operating income of $120 million and  $160 million. For the year, the Seattle-based e-tailer is forecasting net sales of $19.1 billion to $20 billion on operating income of between $740 million and $940 million. Earlier this year, the company had forecasted operating income of $985 million, according to <em>Bloomberg News.</em> The operating income guidance was wide enough to drive an 18-wheeler through.<br /><br />Once again, Amazon has left investors up the creek -- or river -- without a paddle.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/amazon-outlook-disappoints-investors/">Amazon outlook disappoints investors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/24278046/site/14081545?__source=aol|headline|quote|text|&amp;par=aol>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/amazon-outlook-disappoints-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1175927/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/23/amazon-outlook-disappoints-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amzn</category><category>featured</category><category>Internet</category><category>internet retail</category><category>internet retailing</category><category>InternetRetail</category><category>InternetRetailing</category><category>jeff bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon insiders selling and stock buybacks too?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/amazon-insiders-selling-and-stock-buybacks-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/amazon-insiders-selling-and-stock-buybacks-too/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/amazon-insiders-selling-and-stock-buybacks-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/amzn-amazon.com-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Has anybody else out there noticed that Jeff Bezos, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>), recently sold $135 million of his stock? Not to worry, these are his regular 10b5 plan sales that are pre-scheduled with the SEC. Just smart diversification I suppose.</p>
<p>Normally, I would think this is not that big a deal since he owns billions of dollars of the stock as the single largest shareholder. If I were him, I would be selling too, in particular because I have felt that AMZN is overpriced for quite a while. (See <a title="View Serious Money: AAPL, AMZN, GOOG, ISRG -- at what Price? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/serious-money-aapl-amzn-goog-isrg-at-what-price/" target="_blank">Serious Money: AAPL, AMZN, GOOG, ISRG -- at what Price?</a>)</p>
<p>The stock jumped early this month when <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/amazon-com-amzn-soars-on-buyback-plan/">Amazon announced the retirement of debt and a stock buyback</a> plan over the next two years. This was a temporary affect; the stock has been trading in the low $70's recently, give or take a few bucks. </p>
<p>But what strikes me as curious is that this buyback plan is announced while <a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/company/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas/insider-transactions?pn=6&amp;tf=1&amp;srt=1">insider selling</a> has rarely been higher! The buyback and Bezos selling inspired me to look at the latest insider trading. When I checked it out I discovered company directors, officers, and "affiliated persons" have all been sellers and only sellers. To be fair some of the sales are listed as 'planned'; however, the plan does not have to be filed very far in advance, so I am not impressed by this.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/amazon-insiders-selling-and-stock-buybacks-too/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Amazon insiders selling and stock buybacks too?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/amazon-insiders-selling-and-stock-buybacks-too/">Amazon insiders selling and stock buybacks too?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/amazon-insiders-selling-and-stock-buybacks-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1124727/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/amazon-insiders-selling-and-stock-buybacks-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>insider selling</category><category>InsiderSelling</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon posts strong quarter  (update)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/amazon-posts-strong-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/amazon-posts-strong-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/amazon-posts-strong-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/amzn-amazon.com-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Amazon.com Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) today posted a stronger-than-expected fourth quarter and <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/amazon-4q-profit-soars-bolstered-by/n20080130161709990019">gave bullish guidance</a> for sales. However, the company's forecast for full-year operating income of $785 million and $985 million, below the Bloomberg forecast of $1.18 billion.<strike> </strike>Shares of the largest Internet retailer, which doubled last year, <strike>soared</strike> fell in after-hours trading.<br /><br />Net income increased 112% to $207 million, or 48 cents per share, compared with $98 million, or 23 cents, a year earlier. Sales rose 42% to $5.67 billion in the fourth quarter, helped by strong growth outside the U.S. Analysts had expected profit of 48 cents on revenue of $5.37 billion.<br /><br /><span id="bwanpa5">"</span>In our view, these unusual financial results are driven by one thing: continuously improving the customer experience,<span id="bwanpa6">" said Chief Executive Jeff Bezos in the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/amazoncom-announces-fourth-quarter-sales/n20080130160409990045">earnings release.</a><br /><br />The Seattle-based company issued guidance for revenue in the first quarter of between $3.95 billion and $4.15 billion with operating income of between $155 million to $200 million. For the year, Amazon expects sales of $18.75 billion to $19.75 billion with operating income of $785 million to $985 million. Analysts are expecting quarterly sales of $3.92 billion and $14.52 billion for the year. <br /></span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/amazon-posts-strong-quarter/">Amazon posts strong quarter  (update)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/amazoncom-announces-fourth-quarter-sales/n20080130160409990045>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/amazon-posts-strong-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1102196/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/amazon-posts-strong-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amzn</category><category>etail</category><category>internet retail</category><category>InternetRetail</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jeff bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 10-17-07: Amazon volatility of 67 suggests large price movement ahead]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/option-update-10-17-07-amazon-volatility-of-67-suggests-large-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/option-update-10-17-07-amazon-volatility-of-67-suggests-large-p/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/option-update-10-17-07-amazon-volatility-of-67-suggests-large-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /><strong>Amazon.com</strong></a><strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) will report 3rd quarter earnings per share (EPS) on October 23rd</strong>:<br /></p>
<p><br />AMZN November option implied volatility of 67 is above its 26-week average of 41 according to Track Data, suggesting that traders are positioning themselves for larger price risks.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/suntrust-banks-inc/sti/nys">SunTrust Banks</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/suntrust-banks-inc/sti/nys">STI</a>), as of June 29th, STI had total assets of $180.3 billion and total deposits of $122.9 billion:</strong> <br /></p>
<p>STI will report EPS on October 18th. STI call option volume of 3,015 contracts compares to put volume of 3,223 contracts. STI November option implied volatility of 32 is above its 26-week average of 26 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk. </p>
<p><br /><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/option-update-10-17-07-amazon-volatility-of-67-suggests-large-p/">Option update 10-17-07: Amazon volatility of 67 suggests large price movement ahead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/option-update-10-17-07-amazon-volatility-of-67-suggests-large-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1015737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/option-update-10-17-07-amazon-volatility-of-67-suggests-large-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon.com</category><category>Atlanta bank ATM network</category><category>AtlantaBankAtmNetwork</category><category>capital markets home mortgage credit cards</category><category>CapitalMarketsHomeMortgageCreditCards</category><category>insurance brokerage leasing</category><category>InsuranceBrokerageLeasing</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><category>online retailer wow prices</category><category>OnlineRetailerWowPrices</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>SunTrust Banks</category><category>SuntrustBanks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who owns Amazon.com - really?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/who-owns-amazon-com-really/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/who-owns-amazon-com-really/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/who-owns-amazon-com-really/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><p>Two days ago I posted <a title="View Amazon - everyone gets it but me on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/05/amazon-everyone-gets-it-but-me/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">Amazon - everyone gets it but me</font></a> wondering who the heck was driving the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) share price up to such ridiculous levels. Then I spoke with a fund manager at a large investment company and he reminded me that Amazon shares were very tightly held by a few entities. So I looked it up on <a href="http://ownership.thomsonfn.com/ownership/Ownership.aspx?partner=Mzg0UVU5TUxURT1QJFkEQUALSTO&amp;template=1&amp;ticker=AMZN">AOL Money &amp; Finance</a> and found the following. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Jeff Bezos still holds 24% of the stock </li>
    <li>Legg Mason Capital Management, Inc. holds 20.25% </li>
    <li>T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. holds 7.5% </li>
    <li>TCW Asset Management Company holds 5.5% </li>
    <li>ClearBridge Advisors 5.25%. </li>
</ul>
<p>You can see that the top five shareholders control 62.5% of the stock. Looking further I found that the top ten shareholders own about 75% of the outstanding shares. This does not account for other insiders besides Bezos who hold 3% to 5% of the shares. If 15% to 18% of the shares are sold short that does not leave much play in the market and it allows for the potential manipulation of the shares.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/who-owns-amazon-com-really/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Who owns Amazon.com - really?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/who-owns-amazon-com-really/">Who owns Amazon.com - really?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/who-owns-amazon-com-really/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/912186/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/07/who-owns-amazon-com-really/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon.com (AMZN)</category><category>Amazon.com(amzn)</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Wal-Mart (WMT)</category><category>Wal-mart(wmt)</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon's Bezos paid only $1.28 million in 2006]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/amazons-bezos-paid-only-1-28-million-in-2006/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/amazons-bezos-paid-only-1-28-million-in-2006/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/amazons-bezos-paid-only-1-28-million-in-2006/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/amazon_logo.jpg" />In a time of over-the-top CEO compensation packages at under-performing companies, it was rather a breath of fresh air to see that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) Chairman and Chief Executive Jeff Bezos receive a "normal" compensation package for 2006. The founder of the world's largest e-tailer <a href="http://www.leadingthecharge.com/ViewArticle.aspx?id=103678&amp;source=2">received $1.28 million in 2006</a>, including all forms of compensation. To me, this sounds rather low and entirely reasonable for a position as lofty as where Bezos sits.<br /><br />While Bezos is not hurting for net worth with respect to his AMZN holdings, the CEO was paid a measly $81,840 salary in 2006, and was awarded extra compensation for "security services" from the company (not clear what that is exactly, though). Bezos took home no bonus and no stock or option awards last year either, so the $1.28 million was total compensation from the company he founded.<br /><br />Amazon's executive salaries "are designed to be significantly less than those paid by similarly situated companies," according to statements from the company. I would say so -- $1.28 million is rather paltry compared to the annual pay from other executive positions, even at companies that report horrid results and return no value to shareholders. I continue to be confused as to why investors don't scream when executives take home huge compensation packages as stock prices tank and company performance goes south. Let's hope more CEOs follow Bezos' lead.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/amazons-bezos-paid-only-1-28-million-in-2006/">Amazon's Bezos paid only $1.28 million in 2006</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.leadingthecharge.com/ViewArticle.aspx?id=103678&amp;source=2>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/amazons-bezos-paid-only-1-28-million-in-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/885232/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/amazons-bezos-paid-only-1-28-million-in-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Amazon Price-to-Book over 41, WOW!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/sunday-funnies-amazon-price-to-book-over-41-wow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/sunday-funnies-amazon-price-to-book-over-41-wow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/sunday-funnies-amazon-price-to-book-over-41-wow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a></p><p>Yes, you read that correctly <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas/fundamentals?freq=1"><strong>Amazon.com Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas/fundamentals?freq=1"><strong>AMZN</strong></a>) on the day of it's surprising earning report had a trailing Price-to-Book ratio over 41 -- <em>totally nuts!</em> What is it today after the stock run-up and the the inclusion of the positive news, 34.86 -- <em>still nuts!</em> For comparison I would point out that is over five times that of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas/fundamentals?tabs=fundamentals">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas/fundamentals?tabs=fundamentals">GOOG</a>), which is 8.46. I have spoken to many wise investors and business sleuths about this and not found a single explanation -- never mind a good explanation.</p>
<p>After I wrote about not understanding the <em>Amazon flurry of buying,</em> <a title="View Amazon.com: Everything but the kitchen sink...and the fundamentals on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/25/amazons-fundamentals-it-has-none/" target="_blank">Amazon.com: Everything but the kitchen sink...and the fundamentals</a>, one reader responded quite succinctly in <a title="View Amazon reflections: the short answer on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/amazon-reflections-the-short-answer/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">Amazon reflections: the short answer</font></a>, which supported my premise that perhaps the share price was kind of lofty. And after Amazon's great earnings report and all the hype it has a <strong>profit margin of 1.77%</strong>, about the same as your average supermarket.</p>
<p>My colleague Georges Yared has done a good job of explaining some reasons for the buying of AMZN shares following the earnings report in <a title="View Amazon.com: The conundrum on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/26/amazon-com-the-conundrum/" target="_blank">Amazon.com: The conundrum</a>, but no one can explain the metrics. All I can say is, Jeff Bezos is a great salesman, and P.T. Barnum would be jealous.</p>
<p>If you are like me you and prefer a P/B closer to 1.0, read my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a> posts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. </em><em>Check out his other posts for<strong> BloggingStocks </strong></em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/sheldon-liber/"><em><strong>here</strong></em></a><em><strong>.</strong></em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/sunday-funnies-amazon-price-to-book-over-41-wow/">Sunday Funnies: Amazon Price-to-Book over 41, WOW!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/sunday-funnies-amazon-price-to-book-over-41-wow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/884780/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/29/sunday-funnies-amazon-price-to-book-over-41-wow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>price-to-book ratio</category><category>Price-to-bookRatio</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Sunday Funnies</category><category>SundayFunnies</category><category>Value investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple, Amazon, GE, and Microsoft: the role of expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p>By most accounts, shares in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) should have gone well above $100 this week and held there. Instead, the stock trades little better than it did after its last earnings announcement in January.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) certainly reported a good quarter, but for its shares to be 70% higher than they were a month ago seems extreme. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) did well this earnings season and neither has seen anywhere near this kind of market performance.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has traded down most of the year. Observers would attribute that to comments that CEO Steve Ballmer made about expectations for the company's new Vista OS being too high. As it turned out, the expectations were fine. The market overreacted to Ballmer. The stock moved up on good Vista news.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) is another company with strong earnings, but the stock has moved down over the last three months. That is until a Citigroup analyst raised a very old idea of breaking the company into pieces. In a day, the stock recovered all it had lost in the previous 90 days.</p>
<p>There is a theme in the trading of these four stocks. It's so simple as to be childish. Low expectations can give way to big yields. High expectations are hard to top. The markets expected the world of Apple. Apple delivered. The market saw no benefit in driving the stock much higher. The Mac and iPod did just great. The iPhone is on the way. No news.</p>
<p>Amazon has been pounded by Wall Street and the press for the last two years. The company lacks focus. It's in too many businesses. Jeff Bezos, the founder and CEO, spends too much money on marketing and building out the company's technology platform. That hurts margins. Of course, all of that is true until the day it isn't. That day fell in the middle of last week.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/">Apple, Amazon, GE, and Microsoft: the role of expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/884299/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/28/apple-amazon-ge-and-microsoft-the-role-of-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Apple</category><category>earnings</category><category>ebay</category><category>expectations</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>Vista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Voice-activated search: From ChaCha to Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/voice-activated-search-from-chacha-to-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/voice-activated-search-from-chacha-to-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/voice-activated-search-from-chacha-to-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p>Last year I received an email inviting me "to take part in a revolutionary new search engine." I was offered to be a guide at ChaCha, a new search engine that uses human guides to help users find what they want. Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amzn/nys">AMZN</a>) CEO Jeff Bezos invested $6.5 million in ChaCha. Today, with 30,000 guides (I never signed up) and expecting 300,000 by June, the founder, Scott Jones, is <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2007/03/01/8401023/index.htm?source=aol_quote">taking ChaCha one step further</a> -- his goal is to make ChaCha the search engine of choice for cell-phone users.<br /><br />ChaCha will be available at a toll-free number, with easy searches handled by voice-recognition software and more complicated ones going to ChaCha guides. The guides will enter the results of their searches into a voice-recognition database for future users. While users wait for the guide, voice ads will be played. According to Jones, cell-phone providers will replace 411 services with ChaCha by 2010.<br /><br />While Google Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/goog/nys">GOOG</a>) is the obvious name each time Internet search is mentioned, ChaCha may actually see competition from Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/nys">MSFT</a>). After a few days of rumors, Microsoft said it <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/microsoft-to-acquire-voice-search/n20070315024609990009">will buy</a> Tellme Networks Inc., a provider of voice-enabled mobile search, directory assistance and computerized, speech-driven customer service hotlines. <br /> <br />Microsoft's <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2007/tc20070314_245095.htm?campaign_id=twxa">plans for Tellme's technology</a> are vast and not limited to mobile search but to applications for the home (operating the TV for example), car (getting directions for the nearest gas station) and Microsoft Office applications as well. If one day this technology works smoothly, Google and others would have some catching up to do.<br /><br />I've always seen <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/karaoke-satellite-radio-and-voice-activated-search/">voice-activation as the natural progress</a> of current technology and even wondered in the past if Microsoft wouldn't indeed be the one to bring it to successful fruition. Today, we are one step closer. <br /><br />"Save."<br /><br />"Publish."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/voice-activated-search-from-chacha-to-microsoft/">Voice-activated search: From ChaCha to Microsoft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/microsoft-to-acquire-voice-search/n20070315024609990009>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/voice-activated-search-from-chacha-to-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/853307/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/voice-activated-search-from-chacha-to-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>amzn</category><category>chacha</category><category>goog</category><category>jeff bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>tellme</category><category>voice activation</category><category>voice-activated search</category><category>Voice-activatedSearch</category><category>VoiceActivation</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[10 CEO's That Need To Go: 3 Down, 7 Remain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/10-ceos-that-need-to-go-3-down-7-remain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/10-ceos-that-need-to-go-3-down-7-remain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/10-ceos-that-need-to-go-3-down-7-remain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/qcom/" rel="tag">QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM)</a></p><em>24/7 Wall St</em>. generated a list of 10 public company CEOs in December where investors in the underlying companies would be better served by a new CEO. Three of these have already been axed, and that is in roughly 6 weeks. Some calls aren't actually calling for the CEOs to be fired, but a title change or strategy shift was in order. There were few outright "He's Gotta Go!" and there still are. The FIRED CEO's are first, and the others are alphabetical by company. The names are highlighted so you can see the full comments and suggestions from the original article on each, and the original comments left on Bloggingstocks are here for the 7 of the 10 that are still pending:<br /><br />Dell's (NASDAQ:DELL) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/10_ceos_who_nee.html">Kevin Rollins</a>. <br /><em>STATUS: FIRED! His name will be forgotten by Wall Street most likely and will be referred to as 'That guy that took Dell down.'</em><br /><br />Gap Inc.'s (NYSE:GPS) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t.html">Paul Pressler</a>. <br /><em>STATUS: KIA! He's done and he'll have to go in for that old Japanese executive retraining boot camp before anyone speaks to him again. </em><br /><br />The Home Depot's(NYSE:HD) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t_4.html">Bob Nardelli</a>. <br /><em>STATUS: FIRED! But beware, he took a huge exit-payout and only has a 1-year non-compete. He'll probably end up in private equity and his name won't quietly disappear. </em><br /><br />Amazon.com's (NASDAQ:AMZN) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t_5.html">Jeff Bezos</a>. He doesn't need to go away entirely! He just needs to do a partial title change. But will anyone inside the company tell the emperor he is wearing no space suit? <br /><em>STATUS: Earnings are today, but either way the company could use an add-on here. I like Bezos and this will give him the latitude needed. </em><br /><br />Citigroup's (NYSE:C) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t_3.html">Chuck Prince</a>. The prince calls for Draconian measures, and maybe the prince didn't mean just THIS Prince. <br /><em>STATUS: Everyone has told this prince he isn't wearing clothes and he keeps ruling and ignores this. Sally Krawchek wasn't the problem. The stock is up in hopes that he'll leave and that new management can run the beast better.</em><br /><br />Eastman Kodak's (NYSE:EK) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/10_ceos_who_nee_1.html">Antonio Perez</a>. Maybe he's nice, but for heaven's sake get the restructuring over with and get some mojo. Bring in a digital media leader.<br /><em>STATUS: The earnings have turned, but the long painful restructuring continues and the last medical imaging sale funds might not be used aggressively enough. EK would still be better under a different digital leader.</em><br /><br />Qualcomm Inc.'s (NASDAQ:QCOM) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_may_ne.html">Paul Jacobs</a>. He isn't being sent home yet, but his dad's shoes are proving very hard to fill.<br /><em>STATUS: The note here is still in the pending file and he may survive if he can keep the stock from falling and if he can keep the company's patents and contracts alive.</em><br /><br /><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t_6.html">Sirius Satellite Radio (NASDAQ:SIRI) &amp; XM Satellite Radio (NASDAQ:XMSR)</a>. It is a dead heat in the race, and if two companies need to merge, it's these two. There can be only one.<br /><em>STATUS: Still pending, still a tie! They should just merge and get it over with. A merger wouldn't be great for consumers and competition, but would be best for investors.</em><br /><br />Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s(NYSE:WMT) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t_1.html">Lee Scott</a>. The company is struggling under its own weight, and it needs some good PR. Getting rid of the Darth Vader of Corporate America and bringing in someone fun and likeable would be the best start.<br /><em>STATUS: He's still gotta go. If he is still there at the end of this year it is because he intimidated every internal external challenger. Darth Vader wasn't a hero until the last 10 minutes of the original series after almost 6 hours of being the bad guy. Lee Scott could become a good guy if he would just leave.</em><br /><br />Yahoo!'s (NASDAQ:YHOO) <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t_2.html">Terry Semel</a>. Yes, when you see him leave or forced out, Yahoo! holders should be happy.<br /><em>STATUS: Panama may save him, but Wall Street would rather see Semel leave. Sue Decker is better suited for the role. </em><br /><br />A lot of these may be controversial, and there are plenty of other companies that might benefit from a new CEO. None of these attacks are personal and these are merely based on observation and analysis. The list could probably be 100 CEO's long.<br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a partner in <a href="http://www.247wallst.com">24/7 Wall St. LLC</a>; He does not hold securities in the companies he covers. He also not been compensated to represent any of these companies in any light.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/10-ceos-that-need-to-go-3-down-7-remain/">10 CEO's That Need To Go: 3 Down, 7 Remain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/10-ceos-that-need-to-go-3-down-7-remain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/746506/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/01/10-ceos-that-need-to-go-3-down-7-remain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>Antonio Perez</category><category>AntonioPerez</category><category>Bob Nardelli</category><category>BobNardelli</category><category>Chuck Prince</category><category>ChuckPrince</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>Dell</category><category>Eastman Kodak</category><category>EastmanKodak</category><category>GAP inc.</category><category>GapInc.</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>HomeDepot</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><category>Kevin Rollins</category><category>KevinRollins</category><category>Lee Scott</category><category>LeeScott</category><category>Paul Jacobs</category><category>Paul Pressler</category><category>PaulJacobs</category><category>PaulPressler</category><category>Sirius</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>TerrySemel</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>XM</category><category>Yahoo!</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wikia or ChaCha: Is the next Google on the horizon?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/wikia-or-chacha-is-the-next-google-on-the-horizon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/wikia-or-chacha-is-the-next-google-on-the-horizon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/wikia-or-chacha-is-the-next-google-on-the-horizon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p>A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/01/technology/01search.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print ">piece in Monday's <em>New York Times</em></a> discussed up-start companies seeking to create new search engines that are better than Google. The most interesting threat may come from Wikia (the start-up of a founder of Wikipedia), which will try to create a search engine much as Wikipedia was created: with the help of programmers and users all over the world. Since 2004, venture capital firms have invested $350 million in 79 search-engine related companies. Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, has invested in ChaCha, another search-engine start-up.<br /><br />Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) investors will want to pay attention to the number of competitors lining up with the goal of toppling Google. Remember, Google began its rise to dominance over Microsoft, Lycos, and others when two Stanford Ph.D. students started the company in 1998 in a friend's garage. All it could take for Google to be ruined is for two more college students to come along and invent a better search engine. I see that as being the primary long-term risk factor for Google investors. In 25 years, will Google still be the "World's Best Search Engine"?<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/wikia-or-chacha-is-the-next-google-on-the-horizon/">Wikia or ChaCha: Is the next Google on the horizon?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/01/technology/01search.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/wikia-or-chacha-is-the-next-google-on-the-horizon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/727321/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/wikia-or-chacha-is-the-next-google-on-the-horizon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ChaCha</category><category>Google</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>search engines</category><category>Wikia</category><category>Wikipedia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon.com's Bezos waxes about utilities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/amazon-com-s-bezos-waxes-about-utilities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/amazon-com-s-bezos-waxes-about-utilities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/amazon-com-s-bezos-waxes-about-utilities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><img id="img1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/amazon.bmp" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />In the early days of <a href="http://www.amazon.com">Amazon.com</a>, the thought was that this company had a limited future. After all, how many books can you really sell?
<p> </p>
<p>Well, of course, the founder of the company, Jeff Bezos, was thinking on a much grander scale; that is, his company would be the dominant player in ecommerce. And he has achieved that. The problem is that the company's financials are still lackluster. While other dot-coms, like <a href="http://www.ebay.com">eBay</a> and <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a>, post strong profits, Amazon.com really looks like an a brick-in-mortar play.</p>
<p>However, Bezos is now moving into other areas. For example, he is allowing the world to use the company's sophisticated infrastructure, such as for storage, fulfillment and so on. In fact, the company has some big-time clients for these services, such as <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a>. In fact, today, at the <a href="http://www.web2.com">Web 2.0 Conference</a>, Bezos made it clear that this utility strategy is a big priority. </p>
<p>True, the strategy does have some allure. No doubt, much of the Amazon.com infrastructure is underutilized (because the business is seasonal and subject to occasional spikes). What's more, there are many companies that would prefer to outsource certain operations. Actually, this is particularly the case for upstart Web 2.0 companies, which can avoid heavy costs. </p>
<p>But, the fear is that Amazon.com could be losing its focus. Its core business of ecommerce is coming under attack from players like Google as well as traditional retailers such as <a href="http://www.wal-mart.com">Wal-Mart</a>.</p>
<p>Also, building the systems to deliver these utilities is not cheap. Amazon.com has spent $650 million in technologies in 2006. What's more, it will need to spend marketing dollars to find B2B customers. There are also dollars needed to keep the customers.</p>
<p>So, while this may be great for Web 2.0 companies, the pay-off for Amazon.com does look fuzzy.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and operates InvestorOffering.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/amazon-com-s-bezos-waxes-about-utilities/">Amazon.com's Bezos waxes about utilities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/amazon-com-s-bezos-waxes-about-utilities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/698644/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/amazon-com-s-bezos-waxes-about-utilities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><category>Web 2.0</category><category>Web2.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Amazon (still) buying revenue?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/is-amazon-still-buying-revenue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/is-amazon-still-buying-revenue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/is-amazon-still-buying-revenue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/amznlogo.gif" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) has recently started slowing down technology spending and trying to "<a href="http://amzn.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/can-amazon-mind-the-store/">recruit returns</a>" on that investment. At the same time, the world's largest online retailer has started increasing spending on marketing, a move which is raising eyebrows among investors, especially since Amazon's margins aren't growing like dandelions in spring.<br /><br />Does Amazon.com constantly <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlebusiness.aspx?type=ousiv&amp;storyID=2006-11-06T201903Z_01_N06274382_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPRO-RETAIL-AMAZON-MARKETING-DC.XML&amp;from=business">need to fuel marketing and advertising costs</a> to spur growth that investors need to see consistently from the company? That's the sentiment going around these days, although it's just sentiment. But when you see numbers like marketing spending rising 50% over the prior year in Amazon's recently reported third quarter, red, green and blue flags start going up. A gain like this -- which outpaces even sales growth that gained 25% in the same period -- sends a sign; of what I am not sure.<br /><br />Amazon.com has now been accused by some market pundits of "buying revenue," or increasing marketing expenditures to see short-term revenue gains -- which in turn, please investors who myopically always look for "the next quarter's numbers" like that's all that counts. Hogwash, but that's the market for you -- obsessive compulsive disorder when it comes to the next three months' worth of results.<br /><br />(Disclosure: I own AMZN shares as of 11-8-06.)<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/is-amazon-still-buying-revenue/">Is Amazon (still) buying revenue?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlebusiness.aspx?type=ousiv&amp;storyID=2006-11-06T201903Z_01_N06274382_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPRO-RETAIL-AMAZON-MARKETING-DC.XML&amp;from=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://amzn.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/can-amazon-mind-the-store/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/is-amazon-still-buying-revenue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/697603/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/08/is-amazon-still-buying-revenue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AMZN</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>JeffBezos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:54:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
