<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="laborers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/springhill1.jpg" />According to the ADP Employer Services Report, the private sector <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/30/us-usa-economy-idUSN3027570820110330">added 201,000 new jobs</a> in March, basically in-line with 203,000 new jobs that analysts had been expecting to see.</p>
<p>February's figures were revised downwards to 208,000 from a previously estimated 216,000 new jobs.</p>
<p>March's employment gains bring the four-month average of new jobs to 211,000, more than enough to keep the labor track on path. Analysts estimate that the economy needs to add 125,000 new jobs each month in order to keep up with population growth, so any jobs over that figure result in a lower unemployment figures.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/">Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19897221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP Employer Services Report</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>economy</category><category>employees</category><category>gas prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobs</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MySpace Cuts Workforce by 47%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p>I<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/myspace-logo.jpg" />n the beginning, the auto industry had a wide array of manufacturers. As the industry grew, new companies formed but most went by the wayside. The same phenomenon is taking place in the Internet. As new companies are formed, older ones fade away.<br />
<br />
Such is the story of MySpace, as the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791904576075892399066126.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews#"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a><em> </em>reports. Founded in 2003, it had a large following of musicians and was the leader in the new concept of social networking. In 2005, News Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) purchased the site for $580 million. The investment was intended to bring News Corp. into the digital age.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MySpace Cuts Workforce by 47%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/">MySpace Cuts Workforce by 47%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19797217/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/12/myspace-workforce-cut-by-47/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>competitive stragegy</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>employees</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>Myspace</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/unemployment.jpg" alt="" />The dismal jobs front got a bit more good news, following the release of a report showing the nation's employers last year cut the fewest number of workers in more than a decade. Further, the findings showed 2010 ended on a high note, with December recording the lowest number of monthly cuts since 2000.</p>
<p>The slowdown in cuts follows an uptick in activity in 2009 when downsizing reached a seven-year high, according to the 2010 year-end job-cut report, released Wednesday by job-services firm Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas. Last year, employers announced plans to eliminate 529,973 positions, the lowest number since 1997.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/">Job Cuts in 2010 Tumble to Lowest Level in More Than a Decade</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19787630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/job-cuts-in-2010-tumble-to-lowest-level-in-more-than-a-decade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>career</category><category>careers</category><category>challenger</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>employees</category><category>employers</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>joblessness</category><category>jobs</category><category>john challenger</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schepp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pre-Market Outlook: U.S. Futures Higher on Strong China Production Data]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/01/pre-market-outlook-u-s-futures-higher-on-strong-china-producti/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/01/pre-market-outlook-u-s-futures-higher-on-strong-china-producti/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/01/pre-market-outlook-u-s-futures-higher-on-strong-china-producti/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />U.S. stock index futures are higher Wednesday, after better-than-expected factory production data from China. Futures on the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average/%24indu/dji">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> gained 119 points to 11,115.00, while S&amp;P 500 futures rose 13.80 points to 1,193.40. Nasdaq 100 futures advanced 21.75 points to 2,138.75.<br />
<br />
U.S. stock markets closed lower yesterday, with the blue-chip Dow index losing 46.47 points or 0.42%.<br />
<br />
The ADP employment survey for November was due at about 8:15 a.m. ET. However, data on Q3 productivity will be released at 8:30 a.m. ET. The ISM manufacturing data for November will be released at 10 a.m. ET.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/01/pre-market-outlook-u-s-futures-higher-on-strong-china-producti/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pre-Market Outlook: U.S. Futures Higher on Strong China Production Data</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/01/pre-market-outlook-u-s-futures-higher-on-strong-china-producti/">Pre-Market Outlook: U.S. Futures Higher on Strong China Production Data</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/01/pre-market-outlook-u-s-futures-higher-on-strong-china-producti/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19739700/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/01/pre-market-outlook-u-s-futures-higher-on-strong-china-producti/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP employment report</category><category>dxy</category><category>ewa</category><category>featured</category><category>gdxj</category><category>job cuts</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>qld</category><category>rsp</category><category>state street</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Raznick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Applied Materials to Cut 500 Jobs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/applied-materials-to-cut-500-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/applied-materials-to-cut-500-jobs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/applied-materials-to-cut-500-jobs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amat/" rel="tag">Applied Materials (AMAT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/appliedmaterialslogo.jpg" alt="" />Applied Materials (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/applied-materials-inc/amat/nas" target="_blank">AMAT</a>) announced Wednesday that it will <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/applied-materials-cuttting-up-500-jobs-2010-07-21" target="_blank">cut as many as 500 jobs</a> and that it will take a third-quarter charge as it cuts its solar manufacturing presence. <br />
<br />
AMAT is going to decrease its thin-film solar manufacturing equipment products, known as SunFab. AMAT will now focus on crystalline silicon equipment and light-emitting diodes. As a result of this move, AMAT will need to cut jobs and it will take a third-quarter charge between $375 million and $425 million (18 to 21 cents per share). <br />
<br />
AMAT also lowered its adjusted the target on its third-quarter earnings to 10 cents to 14 cents per share. Originally, AMAT forecast earnings between 22 and 26 cents per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/applied-materials-to-cut-500-jobs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Applied Materials to Cut 500 Jobs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/applied-materials-to-cut-500-jobs/">Applied Materials to Cut 500 Jobs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/applied-materials-to-cut-500-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19562662/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/21/applied-materials-to-cut-500-jobs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amat</category><category>Applied Materials</category><category>charges</category><category>earnings charges</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wells Fargo to Cut 3,800 Jobs in Restructuring]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/wellsfargo-200x150.jpg" alt="wfc layoffs" />Wells Fargo (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys" target="_blank">WFC</a>) announced Wednesday that it will lay off 3,800 employees during the next year as the bank attempts to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/wells-fargo-restructures-cutting-3-800-jobs/19545730/" target="_blank">restructure its consumer finance unit</a>. Wells Fargo Financial will be integrated into the company's community banking network -- closing 638 independent consumer finance offices in the process. The firm added that it is no longer going to deal with non-prime mortgage loans.</p>
<p>Reportedly, roughly 27% of the financial firm's Wells Fargo Financial employees will be laid off. In the next two months, 2,800 employees will be sent packing, while 1,000 more will be jettisoned in the next year. According to WFC, these changes will not affect WFC and Wachovia banks across the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wells Fargo to Cut 3,800 Jobs in Restructuring</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/">Wells Fargo to Cut 3,800 Jobs in Restructuring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19546242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/wells-fargo-job-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>Wachovia</category><category>wells fargo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pfizer Beefs Up the Balance Sheet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/pfizer-beefs-up-the-balance-sheet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/pfizer-beefs-up-the-balance-sheet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/pfizer-beefs-up-the-balance-sheet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/pfe-logo-240.jpg" alt="Pfizer PFE logo" />Pfizer Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>), in a move which was not unanticipated, has announced that it intends to reduce it's workforce by as much as 18% over the next 18 months to five years. This announcement comes as the lead-in to<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64H36V20100518?type=globalMarketsNews"> important moves the company must</a> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/wyeth-shareholders-approve-mega-merger-with-pfizer/19103912/">make</a> to remain competitive and profitable in the coming years.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/pfizer-beefs-up-the-balance-sheet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pfizer Beefs Up the Balance Sheet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/pfizer-beefs-up-the-balance-sheet/">Pfizer Beefs Up the Balance Sheet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 May 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64H36V20100518?type=globalMarketsNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/pfizer-beefs-up-the-balance-sheet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19482676/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/19/pfizer-beefs-up-the-balance-sheet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biopharmeceutical</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>Lipitor</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>Viagra</category><category>Wyeth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GlaxoSmithKline Benefits from the Flu During the Fourth Quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/glaxosmithkline-benefits-from-the-flu-during-the-fourth-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/glaxosmithkline-benefits-from-the-flu-during-the-fourth-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/glaxosmithkline-benefits-from-the-flu-during-the-fourth-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/gsk-logo-240.jpg" />GlaxoSmithKline (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/glaxosmithkline-plc/gsk/nys" target="_blank">GSK</a>) announced Thursday that fourth-quarter earnings rocketed 66% thanks to sales of its swine flu vaccine. <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/glaxosmithkline-4q-profit-up-66-pct/439861/" target="_blank">GSK earned</a> 1.63 billion pounds in the quarter ($2.6 billion) compared to 982 million pounds a year earlier. Excluding restructuring charges, GSK saw profit increase to 1.8 billion pounds, which was slightly above analyst estimates. The company's vaccine sales increased 78% to 1.5 billion pounds, in part due to swine flu vaccine sales. Full-year profits checked in at 5.5 billion pounds, or $8.7 billion.<br />
<br />
All wasn't well with the quarter for GSK. The pharmaceutical firm saw generic competition take a 4% chunk out of its U.S. sales. In addition, GSK announced plans to trim its research and development program, but did not specify how many jobs it would cut.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/glaxosmithkline-benefits-from-the-flu-during-the-fourth-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GlaxoSmithKline Benefits from the Flu During the Fourth Quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/glaxosmithkline-benefits-from-the-flu-during-the-fourth-quarter/">GlaxoSmithKline Benefits from the Flu During the Fourth Quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/glaxosmithkline-benefits-from-the-flu-during-the-fourth-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19344709/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/04/glaxosmithkline-benefits-from-the-flu-during-the-fourth-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>generic drugs</category><category>generic medicine</category><category>GenericDrugs</category><category>GlaxoSmithKline</category><category>GSK</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img height="145" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Planned job cuts fell to 50,349 in November, the lowest level in nearly two years. The 9.6% decline from October, according to <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>, is the fourth month in a row in which layoffs fell. Also, from November 2008 to November 2009, planned reductions plunged 72% from 181,671. November was the worst month of 2008.</p>
<p>Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas sees companies slowing down the axe-swinging, a trend that has continued through the back half of 2009. Since July 1, 2009, employers have cut an average of 69,252 jobs each month. Through the end of June, the average was 149,446. The aggressive layoff pace in the first two quarters of 2009 have pushed this year's total ahead of 2008, with the year-to-date planned reduction total reaching 1,242,936 last month. That beats the 2008 full-year total of 1,223,993 and tops the November 2008 amount of 1,057,645 by 17.5%.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/">Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261425/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="145" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" /></p>
<div> </div>
<p>Employers are planning to cut fewer jobs for the third month in a row, according to a new report that   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Layoffs_slowing_down_but_upturn_isn_t_coming_yet'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  <a href="http://www.challengergray.com/" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a> has supplied to <em>BloggingStocks</em>. </p>
<p>The executive outplacement firm says that the number of planned reductions fell 16% in October to 55,679 positions -- from 66,404 in September. Last month's level was the lowest seen since March 2008, when 53,579 layoffs were planned. And, it's 51% lower than October 2008's 112,884 result. Planned staff reductions have fallen in eight of the past 10 months.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/">Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19227245/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>auto sector</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>downsizing</category><category>job creation</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>layoffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />Some of the jobs that have disappeared through this <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/recession/">recession</a> are gone forever, it seems. Even when the market turns, and even gains momentum,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-19-high-unemployment-remains_N.htm"> we could be stuck with a fairly weak employment market for a while</a>. The recovery will take longer than we'd like, putting more distance between now and the top of the next market run. We've lost 7.2 million jobs since December 2007, and the predictions of some economists <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/job-market-expected-to-recover-in-2014/">that we'll get them back by 2014 may actually seem optimistic</a>. </p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Four_Reasons_We_re_Stuck_with_High_Unemployment_For_a_While'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>    Unemployment is at 9.8%, and it's expected to clear 10% early next year. Then, we have the specter of a jobless recovery with which to contend. "Full employment" is often considered to be an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentrate/">unemployment rate</a> of 4% to 5%, but it could be a while before we get there. The last downturn, following the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/dotcom/">dotcom</a> bust, resulted in a peak unemployment rate of 6.3% in 2003 ... and we're already well past that.
<p> </p>
<p>Why is the recovery going to be such a grind? Check out the four major reasons after the jump. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/">Four reasons we're stuck with high unemployment for a while</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-19-high-unemployment-remains_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/four-reasons-were-stuck-with-high-unemployment-for-a-while/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank loans</category><category>BankLoans</category><category>banks</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>dotcom</category><category>economic growth</category><category>EconomicGrowth</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosed</category><category>foreclosure</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>job</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>JoblessRate</category><category>JoblessRecovery</category><category>joblosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>mortgage</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>MortgageDefaults</category><category>mortgages</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment rate hits 9.8%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/labor.jpg" /> Unemployment is at its <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI">highest level since 1983, hitting 9.8% last month</a>. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofLabor/">Department of Labor</a> announced that 263,000 jobs were lost. This follows a revised loss of 201,000 jobs in August (lower than first reported). Nobody expected the August unemployment reprieve to last, and the increase suggests that the forecasted 10.3% unemployment rate for early next year will be realized. </p>
<p>Originally, the forecasted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemployment/">unemployment</a> drop for September was 175,000, according to <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI">Bloomberg News</a></em>, with individual economists surveyed reporting in a range of 100,000 to 260,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment rate hits 9.8%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/">Unemployment rate hits 9.8%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19182223/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of labor</category><category>DepartmentOfLabor</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job loss</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLoss</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Need a job? Consider a move to Nebraska]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/need-a-job-consider-a-move-to-nebraska/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/need-a-job-consider-a-move-to-nebraska/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/need-a-job-consider-a-move-to-nebraska/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/man-manpower-logo.jpg" />Lincoln, Neb., is the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32974781/ns/business-forbescom/" target="_blank">best place in the country for job-hunters</a>. A new survey by headhunting firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/manpower-inc/man/nys">Manpower</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/manpower-inc/man/nys" target="_blank">MAN</a>) reports that 21% of employers there plan to add employees in the next quarter, with only 4% looking to cut. That 17% spread (which Manpower calls the "net employment outlook") is tops in the United States.</p>
<p>Flint, Mich., on the other hand, is at the other end of the spectrum: 26% of employers are planning to chop jobs, while only 9% are forecasting new positions.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/need-a-job-consider-a-move-to-nebraska/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Need a job? Consider a move to Nebraska</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/need-a-job-consider-a-move-to-nebraska/">Need a job? Consider a move to Nebraska</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/need-a-job-consider-a-move-to-nebraska/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19175126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/27/need-a-job-consider-a-move-to-nebraska/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>dayton ohio</category><category>detroit michigan</category><category>employment</category><category>flint michigan</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job hunt</category><category>job hunting</category><category>job market</category><category>job seeker</category><category>job seeking</category><category>lincoln nebraska</category><category>manpower</category><category>new york</category><category>rochester</category><category>salinas</category><category>texas</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>waco</category><category>washington</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" width="220" height="160" alt="" />As we saw this morning, companies <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/">cut 298,000 jobs in August</a>, according to ADP. The forecast was for 250,000 jobs lost. The report also revised last month's decline to 360,000.</p>
<p>Well, the Labor Department's report is due out in two days, and it <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a4yuz57GLJQA">may show a loss of 225,000 jobs</a>, according to a Bloomberg News survey.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/">Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19148442/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>layoffs</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. jobless claims unexpectedly rise by 15,000]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/u-s-jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise-by-15-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/u-s-jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise-by-15-000/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/u-s-jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise-by-15-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="166" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />Bloomberg reports that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMhGnVzXaSfM">15,000 more Americans filed claims for unemployment</a> last week, bringing the total to 576,000. Economists had predicted a drop in claims to 550,000.</p>
<p>The four-week moving average rose to 570,000 from 565,750.</p>
<p>Thirty-six states reported an increase, with Tennessee and North Carolina showing the biggest increases. California showed the biggest decrease as employment in construction jobs kicked in. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/u-s-jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise-by-15-000/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. jobless claims unexpectedly rise by 15,000</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/u-s-jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise-by-15-000/">U.S. jobless claims unexpectedly rise by 15,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/u-s-jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise-by-15-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19135196/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/u-s-jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise-by-15-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>constuction</category><category>defense sector</category><category>General Motors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>LMT</category><category>Lockheed Martin</category><category>unemployment claims</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Private equity firms employ job cuts, salary freezes to get by]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/private-equity-firms-employ-job-cuts-salary-freezes-to-get-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/private-equity-firms-employ-job-cuts-salary-freezes-to-get-by/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/private-equity-firms-employ-job-cuts-salary-freezes-to-get-by/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/05/bpe0033_tr.jpg" alt="" />A survey of U.S. private equity executives and professionals conducted by advisory firms RSM Bentley Jennison and RSM McGladrey concluded that slashing jobs was the most common approach to <a href="https://www.fis.dowjones.com/WebBlogs.aspx?aid=DJFLBO0020090818e58j000jh&amp;ProductIDFromApplication=&amp;r=wsjblog&amp;s=djflbo">cost-cutting among private equity firms</a>. </p>
<p>Nine out of ten respondents said they have cut jobs at their portfolio companies in an attempt to rein in costs during the economic downturn.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/private-equity-firms-employ-job-cuts-salary-freezes-to-get-by/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Private equity firms employ job cuts, salary freezes to get by</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/private-equity-firms-employ-job-cuts-salary-freezes-to-get-by/">Private equity firms employ job cuts, salary freezes to get by</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/private-equity-firms-employ-job-cuts-salary-freezes-to-get-by/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19134047/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/private-equity-firms-employ-job-cuts-salary-freezes-to-get-by/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bentley Jennison</category><category>cost-cutting</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>McGladrey</category><category>private equity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Continental releases earnings, announces job cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/continental-releases-earnings-announces-job-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/continental-releases-earnings-announces-job-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/continental-releases-earnings-announces-job-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/cal-continental-airlines-logo.jpg" />Earlier this morning, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys">Continental Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys">CAL</a>) announced that it will <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/continental-cuts-1700-jobs-raises-fees/580217">cut 1,700 jobs</a>, along with raising fees for checking luggage. CAL tagged this news along with its quarterly earnings report, in which it reported a loss of $1.72 per share. In the same quarter a year ago CAL lost a nickel per share. Excluding one-time items, CAL lost $1.36 per share compared to estimates for a loss of $1.35 per share. Quarterly revenue slipped 22.7% to $3.13 billion in the quarter, just shy of the consensus estimate.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/continental-releases-earnings-announces-job-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Continental releases earnings, announces job cuts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/continental-releases-earnings-announces-job-cuts/">Continental releases earnings, announces job cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/continental-releases-earnings-announces-job-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104976/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/continental-releases-earnings-announces-job-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>CAL</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>luggage fees</category><category>LuggageFees</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kimberly-Clark cuts 3% of its staff]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/kimberly-clark-cuts-3-of-its-staff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/kimberly-clark-cuts-3-of-its-staff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/kimberly-clark-cuts-3-of-its-staff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kmb/" rel="tag">Kimberly-Clark (KMB)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/kmb-kimberly-clark-logo.jpg" width="220" height="41" />I would think that all of the diapers the latest FightBaby goes through may have helped <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kimberly-clark-corporation/kmb/nys">Kimberly-Clark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kimberly-clark-corporation/kmb/nys">KMB</a>) a bit, but that was not the case.</p>
<p>The home of Kleenex and Huggies announced yesterday that it will cut 1,600 jobs, roughly <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/jobs/huggies-kleenex-maker-cuts-1600-jobs/543320">3% of its total workforce</a>. A majority of the cuts will come from salaried and nonproduction workers; the company does not plan to close any plants. The company believes that these cuts will save roughly $150 million a year, or 25 cents per share. These results will be reflected the most in the second quarter, when the company will record $110 million of the costs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/kimberly-clark-cuts-3-of-its-staff/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kimberly-Clark cuts 3% of its staff</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/kimberly-clark-cuts-3-of-its-staff/">Kimberly-Clark cuts 3% of its staff</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/kimberly-clark-cuts-3-of-its-staff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19078919/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/kimberly-clark-cuts-3-of-its-staff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>babies</category><category>baby</category><category>baby products</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic downturn</category><category>economic situation</category><category>huggies</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>Kimberly-Clark</category><category>kleenex</category><category>KMB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Monsanto tops 3Q profit estimates, warns on Roundup earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/monsanto.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monsanto-company/mon/nys">Monsanto Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monsanto-company/mon/nys">MON</a>) pleasantly surprised the Street with a stronger-than-expected <a href="http://www.reuters.com/legacyArticle?duid=mtfh91836_2009-06-24_14-23-47_n24155884_newsml&amp;rpc=33&amp;type=marketsnews">third-quarter profit</a>. This morning, the company reported quarterly net income of $694 million, or $1.25 per share, besting analysts' expectations for a profit of $1.18 per share. Net sales arrived at $3.2 billion, down 11% from the year-ago period.</p>
<p>Additionally, Monsanto said it will create a separate division for its herbicides business, in order to "better align spending and working capital needs." The firm will also undergo a restructuring that will result in 900 lost jobs, or less than 4% of its global workforce. The change will translate to a fourth-quarter charge of roughly $350 million, or 41 cents to 47 cents per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Monsanto tops 3Q profit estimates, warns on Roundup earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/">Monsanto tops 3Q profit estimates, warns on Roundup earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19076638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/24/monsanto-tops-3q-profit-estimates-warns-on-roundup-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>herbicides</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>MON</category><category>Monsanto Company</category><category>options</category><category>restructuring</category><category>Roundup</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>third-quarter earnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job losses slowed during May]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />According to Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas, <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/jobs/new-report-shows-job-losses-slowing/511222">job losses slowed during May</a> for the the fourth straight month. The report showed that job cuts totaled 111,182 during May, 16% better than the 132,590 jobs cut in April. May's total was the lowest since last September, but was still 7.4% higher than a year ago. <br /><br />The greatest amount of layoffs came from the government/non-profit sector for the third-straight month. The second largest amount of cuts came from the computer sector, followed by the chemical and automotive industries. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job losses slowed during May</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/">Job losses slowed during May</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19056143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger</category><category>corporate job cuts</category><category>CorporateJobCuts</category><category>Gray Christmas</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>May job losses</category><category>MayJobLosses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
