<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Economy Loses 95,000 Jobs but Markets Open Higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" alt="job losses" />The Labor Department reported this morning that the nation's <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/economy-loses-95k-jobs-due-to-government/1252302/">payrolls contracted by a net total of 95,000</a> in September. The latest rounds of layoffs from the government trumped what hiring was done in the private sector, leading to the rather nasty number.</p>
<p>According to the Labor Department, local governments jettisoned 76,000 jobs last month -- most of them in education. This cut was the largest by local governments in 28 years. Also, 77,000 temporary census jobs ended in September. Offsetting these two figures somewhat was the private sector, which added 64,000 last month.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economy Loses 95,000 Jobs but Markets Open Higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/">Economy Loses 95,000 Jobs but Markets Open Higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19666399/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/economy-loses-95-000-jobs-but-markets-pare-losses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>labor department</category><category>payrolls</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consol Energy to Close Mine]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/consol-energy.jpg" alt="Consol Energy (CNX) logo" />Friday morning, Consol Energy (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/consol-energy-incorporated/cnx/nys">CNX</a>) announced that it will <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/consol-energy-to-close-mine-84/rfid372724319/?channel=pf">close its Mine 84</a> near Washington, Penn. The closure will cost roughly 60 employees their jobs.</p>
<p>The employees who lose their jobs will have the choice of taking a position with another Consol operation. The company will conduct the layoffs for 14 days, starting at 12:01 AM on December 1 -- talk about your happy holiday season. The good news is that these workers will be able to look for alternative work before the layoffs take place.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consol Energy to Close Mine</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/">Consol Energy to Close Mine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19657009/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNX</category><category>Consol Energy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>layoffs</category><category>mining</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Lost Fewer Jobs Than Expected in August]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />The U.S. lost fewer jobs than expected in August. Here are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/business/economy/04jobs.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print">the key stats</a>, as reported in the <em>New York Times</em>:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The economy lost another 54,000 jobs last month.</li>
    <li>Private companies added 67,000 jobs.</li>
    <li>The unemployment rate rose to 9.6% from 9.5%.</li>
    <li>The government lost 121,000 jobs in August.</li>
    <li>State and local governments cut 10,000 jobs and another 114,000 temporary census positions.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Lost Fewer Jobs Than Expected in August</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/">U.S. Lost Fewer Jobs Than Expected in August</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/business/economy/04jobs.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19620413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Merck to Close Eight Plants]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/merck-plant-closures-job-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/merck-plant-closures-job-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/merck-plant-closures-job-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Merck MRK logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/mrk-logo-240.jpg" />Thursday morning, Merck &amp; Co. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc-new/mrk/nys" target="_blank">MRK</a>) announced that it would <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/drugmaker-merck-closing-8-plants-8/1153529/" target="_blank">shut down</a> eight manufacturing plants and eight research sites around the world, along with consolidating some of its offices.</p>
<p>Merck notes that these moves are part of the ongoing consolidation triggered by the acquisition of Schering-Plough last November. The acquisition made Merck the second-biggest pharmaceutical firm in the world. That said, the company is going to eliminate roughly 15% of its workforce (which comes out to 16,000 jobs) in order to save roughly $3.5 billion a year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/merck-plant-closures-job-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Merck to Close Eight Plants</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/merck-plant-closures-job-cuts/">Merck to Close Eight Plants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/merck-plant-closures-job-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19546342/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/08/merck-plant-closures-job-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>manufacturing plants</category><category>Merck</category><category>MRK</category><category>Schering-Plough</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Private Employment Was Down in March]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/private-employment-was-down-in-march/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/private-employment-was-down-in-march/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/private-employment-was-down-in-march/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/unemployment.jpg" />When it comes to unemployment reports, you can pick any one of at least three that will give you quite different results. On Friday we will get the Labor Department's report on March jobs. It is expected to show overall growth due to an increase in hiring of about 100,000 census takers. Then you have the Automatic Data Processing and the forecasting from Macroeconomics Advisers. The ADP report showed that employers shed only slightly fewer than 24,000 jobs in February and 23,000 in March.</p>
<p>Then there is the private employment report discussed in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304252704575155522246442654.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_careerjournal"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required). The report showed weakness across a range of sectors and businesses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/private-employment-was-down-in-march/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Private Employment Was Down in March</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/private-employment-was-down-in-march/">Private Employment Was Down in March</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/private-employment-was-down-in-march/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19422942/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/private-employment-was-down-in-march/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>private employment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil Closes Above $80]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/oil.jpg" alt="rising oil prices" />Over the past week, oil prices have been flirting with the psychological $80 barrier, and they were finally able to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703862704575099150382162356.html?mod=WSJ_Stocks_RIGHTMoreInMarkets">settle above $80 Wednesday</a>. Oil traded up $1.26 a barrel to $80.94.<br />
<br />
Earlier today, we got the weekly inventory report from the Department of Energy, which showed a greater-than-expected jump in reserves last week. The report showed that oil inventories grew by four million barrels, which was well above the one-million-barrel increase that analysts had forecast.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil Closes Above $80</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/">Oil Closes Above $80</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19382163/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/03/oil-closes-above-80/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>80 oil</category><category>80Oil</category><category>Automatic Data Processing</category><category>AutomaticDataProcessing</category><category>currencies</category><category>currency</category><category>dollar</category><category>employment</category><category>euro</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Democrats' jobs bill likely to hinge on job creation in the private sector]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/democrats-jobs-bill-likely-to-hinge-on-job-creation-in-the-priv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/democrats-jobs-bill-likely-to-hinge-on-job-creation-in-the-priv/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/democrats-jobs-bill-likely-to-hinge-on-job-creation-in-the-priv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/capitol-senate200.jpg" />What are the chances of a <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/11/17/hoyer.jobs.bill/">jobs bill</a> emanating from the U.S. Congress in the immediate future? As of now, put it at 60/40 in favor.</p>
<p>Two factors that will help determine the jobs bill's fate: 1) health care reform legislation and 2) net monthly job losses/creation.</p>
<p>Assuming a December passage of health care reform legislation (signing it on the one-year anniversary of President Obama's inauguration has a nice ring to it), and continued, monthly job losses through March (which is likely), that will give Congress the legislative time and also underscore the necessity of an infrastructure-based jobs bill.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/democrats-jobs-bill-likely-to-hinge-on-job-creation-in-the-priv/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Democrats' jobs bill likely to hinge on job creation in the private sector</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/democrats-jobs-bill-likely-to-hinge-on-job-creation-in-the-priv/">Democrats' jobs bill likely to hinge on job creation in the private sector</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/democrats-jobs-bill-likely-to-hinge-on-job-creation-in-the-priv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19257416/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/democrats-jobs-bill-likely-to-hinge-on-job-creation-in-the-priv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>health care reform</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job creation</category><category>job losses</category><category>jobs bill</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. loses 203,000 jobs in October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" width="220" height="166" alt="" />Sorry to say that the jobs report for October is bleak. According to ADP National Employment, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f6a43946-c940-11de-b551-00144feabdc0.html">203,000 jobs were lost</a>.</p>
<p>Since the recession started, U.S. job losses have risen from 7.6 million to 15 million.</p>
<p>Here are the numbers by sectors:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. loses 203,000 jobs in October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/">U.S. loses 203,000 jobs in October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19222830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/u-s-loses-203-000-jobs-in-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pfizer reports solid quarterly earnings thanks to cost-cutting maneuvers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/pfizer-reports-solid-quarterly-earnings-thanks-to-cost-cutting-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/pfizer-reports-solid-quarterly-earnings-thanks-to-cost-cutting-m/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/pfizer-reports-solid-quarterly-earnings-thanks-to-cost-cutting-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/pfizer.jpg" />On Tuesday, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) stepped into the earnings spotlight, announcing a higher <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jOQDCtOP4Y6zBVOqsZUbXtSOrryQD9BEQ1600">third-quarter profit compared to last year</a>. The pharmaceutical firm earned 43 cents per share, or  51 cents per share in adjusted earnings. A year ago, PFE earned 34 cents per share before item exclusions. The Street expected PFE to report third-quarter earnings of 48 cents per share excluding items. <br /><br />Quarterly revenue checked in at $11.62 billion,  3% lower than last year's third-quarter revenue. Revenue was pulled roughly 5% lower due to unfavorable foreign exchange rates.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/pfizer-reports-solid-quarterly-earnings-thanks-to-cost-cutting-m/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pfizer reports solid quarterly earnings thanks to cost-cutting maneuvers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/pfizer-reports-solid-quarterly-earnings-thanks-to-cost-cutting-m/">Pfizer reports solid quarterly earnings thanks to cost-cutting maneuvers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/pfizer-reports-solid-quarterly-earnings-thanks-to-cost-cutting-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19202215/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/pfizer-reports-solid-quarterly-earnings-thanks-to-cost-cutting-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>integration</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>medicine</category><category>pfe</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>pharmaceutical sector</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>PharmaceuticalSector</category><category>Wyeth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ten views of unemployment around the world]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/ten-views-of-unemployment-around-the-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/ten-views-of-unemployment-around-the-world/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/ten-views-of-unemployment-around-the-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />The United States is not alone. We just saw the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" target="_blank">unemployment rate creep higher to 9.8% for September</a>, and the rest of the world is coming with us. </p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/world_news/Ten_views_of_unemployment_around_the_world'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>The worldwide <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/recession/">recession</a> is still circling the globe, it seems, leaving slashed jobs in its wake. While the rise in unemployment is essentially a fact of life, how countries are responding to it differs widely. Some are <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/world/2009-10-02-world-unemployment_N.htm" target="_blank">spending aggressively to protect jobs</a>; for example, by chipping in some extra cash to pay for shorter work weeks. </p>
<p>In the 30 countries comprising the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), unemployment is as low as 3.2% in the Netherlands and as high as 17.6% in Spain, as of July 2009.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/ten-views-of-unemployment-around-the-world/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ten views of unemployment around the world</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/ten-views-of-unemployment-around-the-world/">Ten views of unemployment around the world</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/world/2009-10-02-world-unemployment_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/ten-views-of-unemployment-around-the-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183262/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/03/ten-views-of-unemployment-around-the-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>developing countries</category><category>developing markets</category><category>developing nations</category><category>developing world</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>jobless</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment rate hits 9.8%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/labor.jpg" /> Unemployment is at its <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI">highest level since 1983, hitting 9.8% last month</a>. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofLabor/">Department of Labor</a> announced that 263,000 jobs were lost. This follows a revised loss of 201,000 jobs in August (lower than first reported). Nobody expected the August unemployment reprieve to last, and the increase suggests that the forecasted 10.3% unemployment rate for early next year will be realized. </p>
<p>Originally, the forecasted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemployment/">unemployment</a> drop for September was 175,000, according to <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI">Bloomberg News</a></em>, with individual economists surveyed reporting in a range of 100,000 to 260,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment rate hits 9.8%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/">Unemployment rate hits 9.8%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZCXOOaX_XWI>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19182223/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/unemployment-rate-hits-9-8/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of labor</category><category>DepartmentOfLabor</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job loss</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLoss</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[September job cuts steeper than expected]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="september job losses" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/not_hiring_sign.jpg" />Job losses continued to mount in September. Unfortunately, the numbers are even <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/30/adp-report-shows-worse-than-expected-job-losses-in-september/">worse than expected</a>.</p>
<p>According to the ADP National Employment Report, employers shed 254,000 jobs in September. Analysts had been expecting to see the number of job losses at 200,000 in the month.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>September job cuts steeper than expected</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/">September job cuts steeper than expected</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19179409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/september-job-cuts-steeper-than-expected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>jobs</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New jobless claims drop last week]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="jobless claims" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/labor.jpg" />We got a bit of surprising news today, hearing that <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/new-jobless-claims-drop-unexpectedly-to/670400">new jobless claims fell to 530,000</a> last week.<br /><br />Going into today's announcement from the Department of Labor, analysts had been expecting to see an increase of 5,000 new jobless claims last week. This marks the third week in a row that we have seen new jobless claims fall.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New jobless claims drop last week</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/">New jobless claims drop last week</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19173029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/24/new-jobless-claims-drop-last-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />The Automatic Data Processing (ADP) employment report was released before the opening bell Wednesday morning, showing that the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-aug-adp-employment-down-298000-2009-09-02-822460">private sector lost 298,000 jobs during August</a>. Expectations called for a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/01/news/economy/job_cuts/index.htm?postversion=2009090208">loss of 255,000 jobs</a>, but the loss was better than the revised 360,000 jobs lost during July. <br /><br />A spokesperson for ADP noted a "gradual improvement in labor markets" because "monthly losses are diminishing." That said, the group did note that job losses are likely to continue for "several more months." <br /><br />In addition to this news, Challenger Gray &amp; Christmas reported that layoffs planned by major U.S. corporations <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/job-cut-announcements-off-in-july-challenger-gray-2009-09-02">fell 21%</a> from July to August. The 76,456 layoffs in August were the second-lowest amount cut in 2009. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/">Job cuts slow in August, more not-so-bad news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19148394/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adp</category><category>adp jobs data</category><category>AdpJobsData</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>featured</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment rate hits 9.4% in May]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/unemployment-rate-hits-9-4-in-may/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/unemployment-rate-hits-9-4-in-may/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/unemployment-rate-hits-9-4-in-may/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" alt="Unemployment data may 2009" />Unemployment continues to be on the minds of most Americans, and in May the level of <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/06/05/job-losses-slow-in-may-but-unemployment-hits-9-4-percent/">unemployment nation wide jumped again</a>, up to 9.4%.<br /><br />We are now sitting at levels of unemployment that we have not seen since all the way back to 1982, as another 345,000 jobs were lost last month. The good news is that this was much lower than the figure that analysts had been forecasting.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/unemployment-rate-hits-9-4-in-may/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment rate hits 9.4% in May</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/unemployment-rate-hits-9-4-in-may/">Unemployment rate hits 9.4% in May</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/unemployment-rate-hits-9-4-in-may/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19059005/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/unemployment-rate-hits-9-4-in-may/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>recession</category><category>slow down</category><category>SlowDown</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Payrolls dropped by only 345,000 in May]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/payrolls-dropped-by-only-345-000-in-may/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/payrolls-dropped-by-only-345-000-in-may/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/payrolls-dropped-by-only-345-000-in-may/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>Here's a great surprise: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124420479347588831.html">Job losses slowed dramatically in May</a>.</p>
<p>Let's look at the numbers:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Non-farm payrolls dropped 345,000. Economists had expected a drop of 525,000. </li>
    <li>The economy has lost 6 million jobs since December 2007. </li>
    <li>The unemployment rate jumped to 9.4%, the highest since August 1983. </li>
    <li>Economists expect to see 10% unemployment soon. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/payrolls-dropped-by-only-345-000-in-may/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Payrolls dropped by only 345,000 in May</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/payrolls-dropped-by-only-345-000-in-may/">Payrolls dropped by only 345,000 in May</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124420479347588831.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/payrolls-dropped-by-only-345-000-in-may/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19058781/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/05/payrolls-dropped-by-only-345-000-in-may/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>payrolls</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job losses slowed during May]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />According to Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas, <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/jobs/new-report-shows-job-losses-slowing/511222">job losses slowed during May</a> for the the fourth straight month. The report showed that job cuts totaled 111,182 during May, 16% better than the 132,590 jobs cut in April. May's total was the lowest since last September, but was still 7.4% higher than a year ago. <br /><br />The greatest amount of layoffs came from the government/non-profit sector for the third-straight month. The second largest amount of cuts came from the computer sector, followed by the chemical and automotive industries. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job losses slowed during May</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/">Job losses slowed during May</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19056143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/job-losses-slowed-during-may/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger</category><category>corporate job cuts</category><category>CorporateJobCuts</category><category>Gray Christmas</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>jobs</category><category>May job losses</category><category>MayJobLosses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Nike eliminating jobs -- potential exists]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/nike_160.jpg" />Is Northwest shoe behemoth <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">Nike</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc/nke/nys">NKE</a>) starting to feel the sting of the economic crisis? It certainly appears that way with the company announcing that it will cut 1,750 jobs, or roughly <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN1451187120090514?rpc=33">5% of its total work force</a>. The cuts are the largest in the company's history, and roughly 500 of the positions will be eliminated from Nike's Oregon headquarters, which employs more than 3,000. A majority of these cuts will occur over the next week.<br /><br />Nike is making the move in hopes of cutting costs and boosting competitiveness, which I will address in a moment. Back in February, Nike hinted that a review of its operations would result in a 4% cut to the firm's staff. Furthermore, the athletic apparel and footwear firm has cut production at Chinese and Vietnamese factories, cut marketing spending, and has reorganized its global business into six geographically based groups. All of these moves have been made to help the company deal with the current economic slowdown and its impact on the consumer. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Nike eliminating jobs -- potential exists</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/">JockStocks: Nike eliminating jobs -- potential exists</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 May 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1546994/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/15/jockstocks-nike-eliminating-jobs-potential-exists/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>athletic apparel</category><category>athletic shoes</category><category>AthleticApparel</category><category>AthleticShoes</category><category>featured</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>Michael Jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>nike</category><category>nke</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>TigerWoods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Private aviation firms suffer, time for a pity party]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/private-aviation-firms-suffer-time-for-a-pity-party/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/private-aviation-firms-suffer-time-for-a-pity-party/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/private-aviation-firms-suffer-time-for-a-pity-party/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/plane.jpg" />Here's one that people are also trying to blame on executives at the Big Three automakers -- <a href="http://www.wired.com/cars/coolwheels/news/2009/05/corporatejets0513">the private aviation industry is hurting</a>. Can you hear the violins starting? <br /><br />Reportedly, corporate "giants ranging from Bank of America to Time Warner are grounding planes," thanks to the faltering economy and public outcry. </p>
<p>How can this be traced back to the automakers? The public outrage really started when the CEOs of the automakers eschewed a more economical style of transport for the lush trappings of their private jets when they were headed to Capitol Hill. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/private-aviation-firms-suffer-time-for-a-pity-party/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Private aviation firms suffer, time for a pity party</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/private-aviation-firms-suffer-time-for-a-pity-party/">Private aviation firms suffer, time for a pity party</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 May 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/private-aviation-firms-suffer-time-for-a-pity-party/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1544758/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/private-aviation-firms-suffer-time-for-a-pity-party/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>extravagance</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>layoffs</category><category>private airlines</category><category>private aviation</category><category>PrivateAirlines</category><category>PrivateAviation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A peek at Yahoo ahead of earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-peak-at-yahoo-ahead-of-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-peak-at-yahoo-ahead-of-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-peak-at-yahoo-ahead-of-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Back on tax day, my friend and colleague Elizabeth Harrow wondered if <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">would announce job cuts when it reports earnings tomorrow</a>. Ms. Harrow looked at a report in <em>The New York Times</em> about preparations for a "significant round of layoffs" and then took a look at the option activity on the Internet search portal a week ahead of earnings. <br /><br />Something that Elizabeth noted was the fact that the 15 strike was going to assume the mantle of peak call open interest when the market opens for trading festivities today. This level could be a major sticking point for the stock, as Yahoo hasn't closed atop the $15 level since late 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-peak-at-yahoo-ahead-of-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A peek at Yahoo ahead of earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-peak-at-yahoo-ahead-of-earnings/">A peek at Yahoo ahead of earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-peak-at-yahoo-ahead-of-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1522041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/a-peak-at-yahoo-ahead-of-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google</category><category>job cuts</category><category>job losses</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>JobLosses</category><category>quarterly earnings</category><category>QuarterlyEarnings</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
