Executive compensation gone wild is a major pet peeve of mine. And if seven-figure pay packages plus restricted stock and options and country club memberships aren't bad enough, some executives are now sticking their companies with the losses on homes they bought.

Here's how it works: A company wants to hire a new CEO but she'll have to relocate to take the job. So the company agrees to make up any loss on the sale of the house. In this real estate market, that's becoming more of an issue. Qwest (NYSE: Q) lost $1.8 million on Edward Mueller's old house.

Part of me doesn't think this is such a big deal. If that's what it takes to recruit the executive, and the board is aware of the potential liability, it isn't really any different from a higher salary. Recent SEC rules that require companies to provide a summary compensation table showing the total value of the top officers' pay packages including all perks make this less of an issue.

Of course, some pay critics are using this as an opportunity to jump on the greed of executives and the supine nature of corporate directors. But the focus should remain on corporate governance and the fact that executive pay is too often completely unrelated to performance. Issues like relocation benefits make for good stories, but they're really not the issue.