<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Johnson &amp; Johnson Headed to $70 and Beyond?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/is-johnson-and-johnson-headed-to-70-and-beyond/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/is-johnson-and-johnson-headed-to-70-and-beyond/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/is-johnson-and-johnson-headed-to-70-and-beyond/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><a href="http:// http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/16/johnson-and-johnson-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-56/#continued"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/jnj-logo.jpg"  alt="" />As outlined</a>, the summer double-dip of health care products/pharmaceutical giant Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), first discussed here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/johnson-and-johnson-a-stock-for-your-childs-college-fund/">on May 20, 2010</a> at a price of $55.87, proved to be a double-bottom, the shares re-took the $60, and they're still favored at this juncture. Here's why: <br />
<br />
JNJ's revenue should increase 3-4% in FY2010, despite some sales erosion to generics. Meanwhile, new orthopedic and cardiovascular products should help the company's medical device unit perform adequately in 2010. A 2-3% revenue gain is seen for FY2011.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/is-johnson-and-johnson-headed-to-70-and-beyond/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Johnson &amp; Johnson Headed to $70 and Beyond?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/is-johnson-and-johnson-headed-to-70-and-beyond/">Is Johnson &amp; Johnson Headed to $70 and Beyond?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/is-johnson-and-johnson-headed-to-70-and-beyond/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19770479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/20/is-johnson-and-johnson-headed-to-70-and-beyond/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jnj</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Scientific to Pay Johnson &amp; Johnson $1.7B Settlement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsx/" rel="tag">Boston Scientific (BSX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=62272&amp;p=irol-irhome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="BSX logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/bsx-boston-scientific-logo.jpg" /></a>Boston Scientific (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/boston-scientific-corporation/bsx/nys">BSX</a> - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/boston-scientific-corporation/bsx/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/boston-scientific-to-pay-jnj-173b-in/883374/">the company reached an agreement</a> with Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/boston-scientific-to-pay-jnj-173b-in/883374/">settle three patent disputes</a>. Under the deal, BSX will pay JNJ $1.725 billion. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on BSX.<br /><br />This morning, BSX opened at $8.48. So far today the stock has hit a high of $8.83 and a low of $8.24. As of 11:50, BSX is trading at $8.47, down 16 cents (-1.8%). The chart for BSX looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives BSX a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Scientific to Pay Johnson &amp; Johnson $1.7B Settlement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/">Boston Scientific to Pay Johnson &amp; Johnson $1.7B Settlement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19340187/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/boston-scientific-to-pay-johnson-and-johnson-1-7b-settlement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Boston Scientific</category><category>BostonScientific</category><category>BSX</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>options</category><category>settlement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Procter &amp; Gamble: A Defensive Holding for 2010?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/procter-and-gamble-a-defensive-holding-for-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/procter-and-gamble-a-defensive-holding-for-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/procter-and-gamble-a-defensive-holding-for-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kmb/" rel="tag">Kimberly-Clark (KMB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/pg-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Procter &amp; Gamble (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>), whose related companies include Johnson &amp; Johnson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) and Kimberly-Clark (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/kimberly-clark-corporation/kmb/nys">KMB</a>), is yet another stock close to a 52-week high. Is it too high to buy, or is it likely to be a prudent defensive holding for 2010?</p>
<p>P&amp;G's price action is pretty interesting. Even though it's near a 52-week high, it's actually flat on the year-to-date frame in terms of performance. That doesn't include dividend payments, of course, but nevertheless, there have been so many other stocks that have bounced off the March lows and delivered serious price appreciation superior to what P&amp;G has been able to accomplish. This is one argument for the stock, since you might not have to worry about it being overbought relative to other equities.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/procter-and-gamble-a-defensive-holding-for-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Procter &amp; Gamble: A Defensive Holding for 2010?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/procter-and-gamble-a-defensive-holding-for-2010/">Procter &amp; Gamble: A Defensive Holding for 2010?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/dec2009/pi20091228_809003.htm?campaign_id=rss_aol_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/procter-and-gamble-a-defensive-holding-for-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19297637/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/30/procter-and-gamble-a-defensive-holding-for-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>kimberly-clark</category><category>KMB</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Fortune's 25 leaders among leaders]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mmm/" rel="tag">3M Corporation (MMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cl/" rel="tag">Colgate-Palmolive (CL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lly/" rel="tag">Lilly (Eli) (LLY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/de/" rel="tag">Deere and Co (DE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ul/" rel="tag">Unilever ADR (UL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-screen/" rel="tag">Stock Screen</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chl/" rel="tag">China Mobile Limited (CHL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/icici-bank-ibn-1/" rel="tag">ICICI Bank (IBN)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/ibm_logo_200x150.gif" alt="" />The recent issue of <em>Fortune</em> magazine discusses how the best of the best train, guide and nurture top managers <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/19/news/companies/top_leadership_companies.fortune/index.htm">to become the leaders</a> that will propel their corporations successfully forward. They list the top 25 companies, which I have used as the basis of a new review to see how they would fair against common metric screens.</p>
<p>In the past few months, many articles have posited that large-cap stocks should excel in the coming year based on their lagging the market behind smaller, more volatile stocks flying out of the March lows. I do not believe this is universally true. Plenty of large-cap stocks did well, such as Anadarko Petroleum (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anadarko-petroleum-corporation/apc/nys">APC</a>), Apple (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), while many small caps went nowhere. Even among the large caps included in Fortune's "Leadership 25," some have doubled.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Fortune's 25 leaders among leaders</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/">Serious Money: Fortune's 25 leaders among leaders</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19256939/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3m</category><category>AAPL</category><category>american-express</category><category>anadarko petroleum</category><category>APC</category><category>Apple</category><category>axp</category><category>china mobile</category><category>CHL</category><category>CL</category><category>colgate-palmolive</category><category>DE</category><category>Deere</category><category>Eli Lilly</category><category>exxonmobil</category><category>FDX</category><category>featured</category><category>federal express</category><category>FedEx</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>general mills</category><category>GIS</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IBM</category><category>IBN</category><category>icici</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnsonandjohnson</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>Lilly</category><category>LLY</category><category>LMT</category><category>lockheed martin</category><category>MCD</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>MMM</category><category>PEP</category><category>pepsico</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>raytheon</category><category>RTN</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>UL</category><category>unilever</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hsy/" rel="tag">Hershey Co (HSY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyx/" rel="tag">NYSE Euronext (NYX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/anf/" rel="tag">Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/nyse.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The future investment stars are already with us. The <a href="http://www.bkfk.com/financialfuture/" target="_blank">NYSE Financial Future Challenge</a>, operated by the <a href="http://www.nysefoundation.org/" target="_blank">NYSE Foundation</a>, <a href="http://www.bkfk.com" target="_blank">By Kids for Kids</a>, <a href="http://www.K12.com" target="_blank">K12 Inc.</a> and the <a href="http://www.uiausa.org" target="_blank">United Investors Association</a>, is in full swing, with five finalists just identified. To reach this level, the participants had to develop a new product, idea or process that would "excite, educate and motivate their peers" to become interested in the financial marketplace. The eventual winner lurks within this subset and will receive a $2,500 prize -- a great way to get that portfolio started. And, he or she will be feted at a closing bell ceremony at the NYSE (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nyse-euronext/nyx/nys" target="_blank">NYX</a>) on January 11, 2010.</p>
<p>The finalists presented a variety of ideas which are sure to generate some buzz. Kelsey Foss, a 12-year-old from Mountainville, NY, proposed a new television show, "Stock Market Tycoon Idol," which would harness the popularity of reality TV while amping up the content. The program would involve the journeys of 10 kids as they seek to make money or lose it, with the possibility of becoming virtual millionaires along the way. The show would be set at a mock NYSE studio on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WallStreet/">Wall Street</a>, and exports would be brought out to mentor the contestants. The reality TV reach would help engage a younger audience.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/">Tomorrow's gurus shine in NYSE Financial Future Challenge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235635/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/tomorrows-gurus-shine-in-nyse-financial-future-challenge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>abercrombie and fitch</category><category>AbercrombieAndFitch</category><category>anf</category><category>apple</category><category>apple inc.</category><category>apple iphone</category><category>apple ipod</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>AppleIphone</category><category>AppleIpod</category><category>chicago</category><category>chicago illinois</category><category>ChicagoIllinois</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hershey</category><category>hersheys</category><category>hsy</category><category>illinois</category><category>iphone</category><category>jnj</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>k12</category><category>k12inc.</category><category>lrn</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>nyse</category><category>nyse euronext</category><category>NyseEuronext</category><category>nysegroupnyx</category><category>nyx</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>sapphire energy</category><category>SapphireEnergy</category><category>six flags</category><category>six flags inc.</category><category>SixFlags</category><category>SixFlagsInc.</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>texas</category><category>virginia</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>walt disney</category><category>walt disney co.</category><category>WaltDisney</category><category>WaltDisneyCo.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kimberly-Clark high on Q3 data ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kmb/" rel="tag">Kimberly-Clark (KMB)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/kmb-kimberly-clark-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kimberly-clark-corporation/kmb/nys">Kimberly-Clark Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kimberly-clark-corporation/kmb/nys">KMB</a>), a consumer products entity whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), is up today on third-quarter results. At the time of this writing, my screen was showing shares of Kimberly-Clark higher by a little under 6%. </p>
<p>According to the corporate <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kimberly-clark-announces-record-eps-for-third-quarter-2009-and-significantly-improved-outlook-for-full-year/rfid263228604?channel=pf">press release</a>, sales declined 1.7%. Not a great start, but Kimberly-Clark highlighted a better metric: organic sales increased 3%, helped along by price increases. Luckily, sales volume didn't fare too badly; they were essentially flat. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kimberly-Clark high on Q3 data </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/">Kimberly-Clark high on Q3 data </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kimberly-clark-announces-record-eps-for-third-quarter-2009-and-significantly-improved-outlook-for-full-year/rfid263228604?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19206100/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/kimberly-clark-high-on-q3-data/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer products</category><category>ConsumerProducts</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>h1n1</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>kimberly-clark</category><category>KMB</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ) posts disappointing revenue numbers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-disappointing-revenue-numbers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-disappointing-revenue-numbers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-disappointing-revenue-numbers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys"><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/jnj-johnson--johnson-logo.jpg" />Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) reported its <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/jandj-posts-1-percent-profit-rise/715015">third quarter figures</a> this morning, and while the company managed to post better than expected earnings, its revenues were lower than analysts had expected.<br /><br />Going into this morning's earnings report analysts had estimated J&amp;J would earn $1.13 per share in the third quarter. The company was able to put up better than expected earnings results, saying it earned $1.20 per share in the quarter. But revenues disappointed. Analysts had forecast  the company's revenues would be $15.22 billion in the quarter, but actual revenues were below estimates at $15.08 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-disappointing-revenue-numbers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ) posts disappointing revenue numbers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-disappointing-revenue-numbers/">Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ) posts disappointing revenue numbers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-disappointing-revenue-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19193950/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/13/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-disappointing-revenue-numbers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bad earnings</category><category>BadEarnings</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>revenues</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where should granny put $50,000?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deo/" rel="tag">Diageo plc (DEO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nvs/" rel="tag">Novartis AG ADS (NVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adp/" rel="tag">Automatic Data Proc (ADP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ed/" rel="tag">Consolidated Edison (ED)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/duk/" rel="tag">Duke Energy (DUK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/so/" rel="tag">Southern Company (SO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nly/" rel="tag">Annaly Capital Management (NLY)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/question-mark01.jpg" />One of my wonderful friends, Ms. P, asked me for some guidance on how she might allocate $50,000 currently earning peanuts in a money market account. Though she is decades from becoming a grandmother, after a brief discussion about her financial parameters, it became clear to me that she was looking for a "granny fund."<br /><br />In reality, my recommendations would be suitable, and perhaps desirable, for many passive investors as well.<br /><br />The $50,000 is a portion of money Ms. P has set aside to purchase a home, which might happen in six months, but could also be pushed out further, depending on the economy and her situation. Basically, she wants to cover all her bases because she might need the money at any time and does not want to be caught short, while at the same time she would like to generate some revenue without taking any big risks. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Where should granny put $50,000?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/">Where should granny put $50,000?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19185367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>altria</category><category>annalycapitalmanagement</category><category>automatic data processing</category><category>AutomaticDataProcessing</category><category>BND</category><category>Condsolidated Edison</category><category>CondsolidatedEdison</category><category>DEO</category><category>diageo plc</category><category>DiageoPlc</category><category>DUK</category><category>duke</category><category>ED</category><category>featured</category><category>general mills</category><category>GeneralMills</category><category>GIS</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnsonandjohnson</category><category>K</category><category>kelloggs</category><category>MCD</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>merck</category><category>MO</category><category>MRK</category><category>NLY</category><category>novartis</category><category>NVS</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>SO</category><category>southern company</category><category>SouthernCompany</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seize the day with JNJ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/18/seize-the-day-with-jnj/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/18/seize-the-day-with-jnj/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/18/seize-the-day-with-jnj/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/jnj-johnson--johnson-logo.jpg" alt="" />I'm reiterating my Buy rating for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/johnson-and-johnson-a-stock-for-your-childs-college-fund/">on May 20, 2009</a> at a price of $55.87. <br /><br />The value proposition with Johnson &amp; Johnson 'isn't rocket science', as they say, even though the business model <span style="font-style: italic;">does involve </span>a considerable amount of science.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/18/seize-the-day-with-jnj/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Seize the day with JNJ</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/18/seize-the-day-with-jnj/">Seize the day with JNJ</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/18/seize-the-day-with-jnj/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19166672/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/18/seize-the-day-with-jnj/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>science</category><category>stents</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Medtronic increases adjusted income, beats by a penny]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/medtronic-increases-adjusted-income-beats-by-a-penny/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/medtronic-increases-adjusted-income-beats-by-a-penny/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/medtronic-increases-adjusted-income-beats-by-a-penny/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsx/" rel="tag">Boston Scientific (BSX)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/mdt-medtronic-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys">Medtronic</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys">MDT</a>), a manufacturer of a whole host of medical devices involved with the management of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, released its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/medtronic-reports-first-quarter-revenue-of-3-9-billion/rfid244872068?channel=pf">Q1 data</a> on Tuesday. Revenues increased 6%, and adjusted earnings per share came in at 79 cents (some of the adjustments were related to restructuring and litigation issues). </p>
<p>The company was able to grow the adjusted-per-share bottom line by 10%. In addition, according to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssPharmaceuticals%20-%20Generic%20&amp;%20Specialty/idUSN2519366920090825?sp=true">Reuters</a>, Medtronic beat estimates by a penny. Shareholders should keep in mind, however, that the quarter benefited from an extra week. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/medtronic-increases-adjusted-income-beats-by-a-penny/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Medtronic increases adjusted income, beats by a penny</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/medtronic-increases-adjusted-income-beats-by-a-penny/">Medtronic increases adjusted income, beats by a penny</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/medtronic-reports-first-quarter-revenue-of-3-9-billion/rfid244872068?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssPharmaceuticals%20-%20Generic%20&amp;%20Specialty/idUSN2519366920090825?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/boston-scientific-tops-estimates-and-guides-higher/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/medtronic-increases-adjusted-income-beats-by-a-penny/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19140646/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/26/medtronic-increases-adjusted-income-beats-by-a-penny/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boston scientific</category><category>BostonScientific</category><category>BSX</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>MDT</category><category>medical devices</category><category>medical stocks</category><category>MedicalDevices</category><category>MedicalStocks</category><category>Medtronic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: What to do with $25,000]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/serious-money-what-to-do-with-25-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/serious-money-what-to-do-with-25-000/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/serious-money-what-to-do-with-25-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oln/" rel="tag">Olin Corp. (OLN)</a></p><img hspace="4" height="154" border="1" align="right" width="211" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/moneyroll.jpg" alt="" /> Money market accounts and certificates of deposit are safe, but they provide very little return on your investment. This fact, and the invigorated stock market, provoked one of my bankers, Dobrinka, at the local Santa Monica Wells Fargo branch, to ask for advice on how I would invest $25,000 if I was just starting out.<br /><br />This is a common question although the starting point in terms of cash varies. It certainly makes a difference how old the person is, their general knowledge about investing and finance, and the particulars of their financial statement.<br /><br />Here is what I suggested sticking to regular themes I have written about before and broadly speaking would be a conservative approach emphasizing safety, diversity, liquidity, dividends and the potential for growth far exceeding cash in the mattress or in a money market account. I also think that it is important for beginners to educate themselves so my suggestions include an educational aspect.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/serious-money-what-to-do-with-25-000/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: What to do with $25,000</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/serious-money-what-to-do-with-25-000/">Serious Money: What to do with $25,000</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/serious-money-what-to-do-with-25-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19128408/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/serious-money-what-to-do-with-25-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BND</category><category>Bonds</category><category>featured</category><category>investing</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>Mutual funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>Olin</category><category>OLN</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>united parcel</category><category>UnitedParcel</category><category>UPS</category><category>VTI</category><category>wells fargo</category><category>WellsFargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Not much going on with Merck's Q2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/not-much-going-on-with-mercks-q2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/not-much-going-on-with-mercks-q2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/not-much-going-on-with-mercks-q2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/mrk-merck-logo.jpg" alt="" />Pharmaceutical company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">Merck</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>), whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/merck-announces-second-quarter-2009-financial-results/rfid233918782?channel=pf">Q2 numbers</a> earlier in the week. Quite frankly, I found them to be boring. Of course, maybe boring isn't too bad these days, right? It's a lot better than an exciting ride on a profit-decline express.</p>
<p>Well, actually, Merck <em>did</em> see a decline in its bottom-line profit, but it wasn't an outrageously awful drop or anything like that. Merck made an adjusted 83 cents per share compared to an adjusted 86 cents per share in the comparable period. Three less pennies isn't the worst thing in the world on a relative basis. Plus, revenues increased 3% if you exclude currency effects (including them gives a decrease of 3%). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/not-much-going-on-with-mercks-q2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Not much going on with Merck's Q2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/not-much-going-on-with-mercks-q2/">Not much going on with Merck's Q2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/business/22drug.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/not-much-going-on-with-mercks-q2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19106937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/not-much-going-on-with-mercks-q2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>drug stocks</category><category>DrugStocks</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>merck</category><category>MRK</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>schering-plough</category><category>SGP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Scientific tops estimates and guides higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/boston-scientific-tops-estimates-and-guides-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/boston-scientific-tops-estimates-and-guides-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/boston-scientific-tops-estimates-and-guides-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsx/" rel="tag">Boston Scientific (BSX)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/bsx-boston-scientific-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/boston-scientific-corporation/bsx/nys">Boston Scientific</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/boston-scientific-corporation/bsx/nys">BSX</a>), an expert in medical devices and a colleague of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), reported earnings for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/boston-scientific-announces-results-for-second-quarter-ended-june-30-2009/rfid233757973?channel=pf">second quarter</a> on Monday after the closing bell. Wall Street liked the results. Shares of the company were bid higher by 5.8% in the after-hours session.</p>
<p>Net sales increased 7%. On an adjusted basis, Boston Scientific made 20 cents per share. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=BSX&amp;coid=62272&amp;client=cb">Earnings.com</a>, the business was supposed to bring in only 13 cents per share. Thus, management did a superb job of beating the analysts at their precious game. Unfortunately, Boston Scientific made the same amount of adjusted profit in the year-ago period, so there wasn't any growth on the bottom line. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/boston-scientific-tops-estimates-and-guides-higher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Scientific tops estimates and guides higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/boston-scientific-tops-estimates-and-guides-higher/">Boston Scientific tops estimates and guides higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=awlmu6CflLpk>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/boston-scientific-tops-estimates-and-guides-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104585/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/boston-scientific-tops-estimates-and-guides-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boston scientific</category><category>BostonScientific</category><category>BSX</category><category>featured</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>medical devices</category><category>medical stocks</category><category>MedicalDevices</category><category>MedicalStocks</category><category>Neuromodulation</category><category>stents</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Johnson &amp; Johnson could surprise Wall Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/jnj-johnson--johnson-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), a company that counts <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) as colleagues, will report results for the second quarter on Tuesday, July 14. JNJ is expected to post a bit of a profit decline. Last year's Q2, according to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=jnj">Earnings.com</a>, saw the health-care business earn $1.18 per share. This time around, analysts are thinking that JNJ will do somewhere around $1.11 per share.</p>
<p>Will JNJ beat the analysts? It's quite possible, since the company has a good record on this count. As a matter of fact, JNJ beat predictions by four cents <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-better-than-expected-earnings/">back in April</a>. Sales, however, came in a little weak. Interestingly enough, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">the market </a>didn't really care too much about the earnings performance on that day. Shares had rallied a bit in pre-market trading, but they closed slightly down by the end of the regular session. I found a similar situation <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/johnson-and-johnson-solid-quarter-but-could-there-be-more-downsi/">back in January</a>. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Johnson &amp; Johnson could surprise Wall Street</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/">Earnings preview: Johnson &amp; Johnson could surprise Wall Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=jnj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/johnson-and-johnson-jnj-posts-better-than-expected-earnings/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/johnson-and-johnson-a-stock-for-your-childs-college-fund/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/johnson-and-johnson-solid-quarter-but-could-there-be-more-downsi/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19095603/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/earnings-preview-johnson-and-johnson-could-beat-wall-street/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>joseph lazzaro</category><category>JosephLazzaro</category><category>PFE</category><category>pfizer</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Procter &amp; Gamble beats in Q3, had a passable quarter ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/procter-and-gamble-beats-in-q3-had-a-passable-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/procter-and-gamble-beats-in-q3-had-a-passable-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/procter-and-gamble-beats-in-q3-had-a-passable-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cl/" rel="tag">Colgate-Palmolive (CL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/procter-and-gamble-pg-logo.gif" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) might not have the best growth rates going these days, but truth be told, I thought the company's <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/pandg-reports-third-quarter-organic/rfid209108415">Q3 report</a> was acceptable given everything that is going on. </p>
<p>Yes, sales declined by 8%, driven by currency effects. Organic sales, however, increased 1%. Earnings per share increased 2% to 84 cents. This beat Wall Street forecasts by four pennies according to this <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUSN307536820090430">source</a>.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/procter-and-gamble-beats-in-q3-had-a-passable-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Procter &amp; Gamble beats in Q3, had a passable quarter </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/procter-and-gamble-beats-in-q3-had-a-passable-quarter/">Procter &amp; Gamble beats in Q3, had a passable quarter </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 May 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUSN307536820090430>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/procter-and-gamble-beats-in-q3-had-a-passable-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1533519/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/procter-and-gamble-beats-in-q3-had-a-passable-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CL</category><category>colgate-palmolive</category><category>consumer products</category><category>ConsumerProducts</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>KFT</category><category>Kraft</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Will Pfizer beat in Q1? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/earnings-preview-will-pfizer-beat-in-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/earnings-preview-will-pfizer-beat-in-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/earnings-preview-will-pfizer-beat-in-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nvs/" rel="tag">Novartis AG ADS (NVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/logo_pfizer.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>), a pharmaceutical entity whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">Merck</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/novartis-ag-basel/nvs/nys">Novartis</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/novartis-ag-basel/nvs/nys">NVS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>), will be reporting first-quarter earnings Tuesday. As one has come to expect, the market believes that the company will be experiencing a decline in bottom-line income. The call is for <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=pfe">49 cents per share</a> versus 61 cents per share in the year-ago period. </p>
<p>That's a drop of 20%. That might not sound so hot, but the good news is that Pfizer has a solid recent track record when it comes to beating earnings expectations. So shareholders might be justified in feeling confident about that aspect of the game. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/earnings-preview-will-pfizer-beat-in-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Will Pfizer beat in Q1? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/earnings-preview-will-pfizer-beat-in-q1/">Earnings preview: Will Pfizer beat in Q1? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/pfizer-raises-a-healthy-13-5-billion/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/earnings-preview-will-pfizer-beat-in-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1528682/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/earnings-preview-will-pfizer-beat-in-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>featured</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>Merck</category><category>MRK</category><category>novartis</category><category>NVS</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>pharmaceutical stocks</category><category>pharmaceuticals</category><category>PharmaceuticalStocks</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><category>tom taulli</category><category>TomTaulli</category><category>WYE</category><category>Wyeth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should Buffett &amp; Roubini "Face the Nation"?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/should-buffett-and-roubini-face-the-nation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/should-buffett-and-roubini-face-the-nation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/should-buffett-and-roubini-face-the-nation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/warren-buffett.jpg" alt="" />The plight of the US and global economy, and how it touches everyone, has most people believing we are in for a long drawn out period of sluggish growth, and that a lot of pain is still to come. For most companies and individuals this means they can not obtain enough liquidity, reduce debt or increase their net cash positions fast enough.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/should-buffett-and-roubini-face-the-nation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should Buffett &amp; Roubini "Face the Nation"?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/should-buffett-and-roubini-face-the-nation/">Should Buffett &amp; Roubini "Face the Nation"?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/should-buffett-and-roubini-face-the-nation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1465475/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/should-buffett-and-roubini-face-the-nation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>face the nation</category><category>FaceTheNation</category><category>featured</category><category>global economy</category><category>GlobalEconomy</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnsonandjohnson</category><category>nouriel roubini</category><category>NourielRoubini</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Stocks level despite stimulus package passing; MCD, GM, JNJ, GE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/closing-bell-dow-nasdaq-sandp-level-despite-stimulus-package-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/closing-bell-dow-nasdaq-sandp-level-despite-stimulus-package-pa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/closing-bell-dow-nasdaq-sandp-level-despite-stimulus-package-pa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-black-white.jpg" />Despite the stimulus package, despite $75 billion mortgage relief, and despite the markets holding in around the old <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/02/18/will-novembers-lows-hold-as-support/">key support levels</a> from November, today was one of those days where you could have flipped a coin to give a verdict on how the day felt. The FOMC minutes were effectively a further economic warning and industrial production and capacity utilization were again a <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/02/18/production-capacity-head-for-the-hills/">further disappointment</a>. Ditto on <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/02/18/housing-starts-show-market-is-far-from-bottom/">weak housing</a>. <br /><br />Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	7,555.63 	+3.03 (0.04%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	788.41 	-0.76 (-0.10%) <br />Nasdaq 	1,467.97 	-2.69 (-0.18%) <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/02/18/top-pre-market-analyst-upgrades-downgrades-cof-celg-rock-mod-snn-afl-amx-spss-vq-wms/"><br /></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/closing-bell-dow-nasdaq-sandp-level-despite-stimulus-package-pa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Stocks level despite stimulus package passing; MCD, GM, JNJ, GE</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/closing-bell-dow-nasdaq-sandp-level-despite-stimulus-package-pa/">Closing Bell: Stocks level despite stimulus package passing; MCD, GM, JNJ, GE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/closing-bell-dow-nasdaq-sandp-level-despite-stimulus-package-pa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1464689/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/closing-bell-dow-nasdaq-sandp-level-despite-stimulus-package-pa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ge</category><category>gm</category><category>jeff immelt</category><category>JeffImmelt</category><category>jnj</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>mcd</category><category>mcdonalds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Buffett says buy, then sells, Roubini says wait -- what's an investor to do?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/buffett-says-buy-then-sells-roubini-says-wait-whats-an-inv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/buffett-says-buy-then-sells-roubini-says-wait-whats-an-inv/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/buffett-says-buy-then-sells-roubini-says-wait-whats-an-inv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tif/" rel="tag">Tiffany and Co (TIF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/question-mark01.jpg" />Late last year my colleague <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/joseph-lazzaro">Joseph Lazzaro</a> posted a story about <a title="View NYU's 'Dr. Doom' Roubini: Stocks may fall another 20% during recession on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/nyus-dr-doom-roubini-stocks-may-fall-another-20-during-rec/" target="_blank">NYU's 'Dr. Doom' Roubini: Stocks may fall another 20% during recession. </a>That has to make one take pause when considering an investment in the stock market today, even after a major drop retesting November lows this week. On the other hand, Warren Buffett went out of his way to encourage the investing public and money managers alike that it was safe to go back into the market.</p>
<p>However, today it has been widely reported that <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Insider+Trades/Buffetts+Berkshire+Slashes+Stake+in+Johnson+%26+Johnson+%28JNJ%29%2C+Picks+Up+More+NRG+Energy+%28NRG%29/4412436.html">Buffett sold off half of his holdings</a> in Johnson &amp; Johnson and trimmed his stake in Procter &amp; Gamble.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/buffett-says-buy-then-sells-roubini-says-wait-whats-an-inv/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Buffett says buy, then sells, Roubini says wait -- what's an investor to do?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/buffett-says-buy-then-sells-roubini-says-wait-whats-an-inv/">Buffett says buy, then sells, Roubini says wait -- what's an investor to do?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/buffett-says-buy-then-sells-roubini-says-wait-whats-an-inv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1412054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/buffett-says-buy-then-sells-roubini-says-wait-whats-an-inv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buffett</category><category>contrarian investing</category><category>ContrarianInvesting</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>GS</category><category>Harley-Davidson</category><category>HOG</category><category>investment timing</category><category>InvestmentTiming</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>JohnsonAndJohnson</category><category>market predictions</category><category>MarketPredictions</category><category>PG</category><category>Procter and Gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>Roubini</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>TIF</category><category>Tiffany</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Has BNI become 'Berkshire' Northern Santa Fe]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bni/" rel="tag">Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/freighttrain.jpg" alt="" />In reading recent stories that <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28996116">Warren Buffett continues to increase his stake</a> in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">Burlington Northern Santa Fe</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">BNI</a>) -- now standing at 22.4% -- I started to wonder if some day the name might be changed to <em>"Berkshire" Northern Santa Fe RR?</em><br /><br /><em>'My pal Warren'</em> is no doubt looking long term, and for most of the past two years has been up on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) BNI investment. However that is not the case today as his most recent purchase at $75.00 per share (not bought in the open market) is under water; the shares closed at $66.04, down 12%. He is losing even more on his average purchase price.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Has BNI become 'Berkshire' Northern Santa Fe</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/">Chasing Value: Has BNI become 'Berkshire' Northern Santa Fe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458901/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BNI</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>featured</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>johnsonandjohnson</category><category>Naked puts</category><category>NakedPuts</category><category>Railroad</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>united parcel service</category><category>UnitedParcelService</category><category>UPS</category><category>value investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
