<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Sex, jokes, dividends  and no surprises]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/12/sex-jokes-and-dividends-no-suprises/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/12/sex-jokes-and-dividends-no-suprises/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/12/sex-jokes-and-dividends-no-suprises/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>This is a brief follow-up to an article I wrote on the importance of including dividends&nbsp;in your investing&nbsp;perspective.&nbsp;I called the post, "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/">Dividends are very sexy -- no joke</a>." The article received a large readership. </p>
<p>I did an experiment to find out what, if any, impact the title might have had on the hit rate. A few days after the original post was published I sent out three separate blog entries with either <em>Sex, Jokes,&nbsp;or dividends</em>&nbsp;highlighted in the headline.&nbsp;It should not surprise anyone that the hit rate favored 1) sex, then 2) jokes, and then 3) dividends.&nbsp;</p>
<p>So, while my experiment was highly unscientific, my conclusion is that adding sex to an article does pay a dividend.</p>
<p>Furthermore I'm glad my readers have a sense of humor.&nbsp;If you want to read a great joke with some&nbsp;VALUE and have not yet read the joke blog, go to: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/" title="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/"><font color="#0b497a">Assessing your investing IQ: More on Jokes - Blogging Stocks</font></a></p>
<p><strong>And if you have not read my post&nbsp;on dividends go read it! : </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/">my&nbsp;original post</a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/"><font color="#000000"> </font></a></p>
<p>Good luck with all your investments! Your comments are always welcome. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/12/sex-jokes-and-dividends-no-suprises/">Sex, jokes, dividends  and no surprises</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/12/sex-jokes-and-dividends-no-suprises/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/631999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/12/sex-jokes-and-dividends-no-suprises/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividends</category><category>experiment</category><category>investing</category><category>IQ</category><category>jokes</category><category>Liber</category><category>money</category><category>sex</category><category>value</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Assessing your investing IQ: More on Jokes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a></p><p>Having used the words 'dividends', 'sex' &amp; '<strong>joke</strong>' in the header of my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/">recent post</a> has set it on fire. While I'm sure the word sex got most peoples attention, for those of you that tuned into the word 'joke' I thought I would share one of the best jokes on value I have heard. This came to me from my 13-year-old son.</p>
<p>A lonely old widower walks in to a pet store hoping to find companionship in a bird. He spots a brightly colored red parrot and asks the shopkeeper how much it costs and is told&nbsp;$10,000. "WOW," the old man gasps, "what is so special about this bird?"</p>
<p>The shopkeeper informs him that this bird has memorized the entire Torah backwards and forwards and can recite any portion at will.&nbsp; "That's some bird," says the old man. </p>
<p>Having a limited budget he inquires about a smaller, but still quite pretty, blue parrot. The shopkeeper tells him that this parrot would cost $20,000. &nbsp;"Oh my," says the old man&nbsp;putting his hand to his forehead. "Why is this parrot so expensive?"</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Assessing your investing IQ: More on Jokes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/">Assessing your investing IQ: More on Jokes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/624979/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-jokes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividends</category><category>jokes</category><category>sex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Assessing your investing IQ: More on Sex]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-sex/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-sex/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-sex/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>Using&nbsp;the words 'dividends', <strong>'sex' </strong>and&nbsp;'joke' in the headline of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/">a recent post</a> has set it on fire.&nbsp;It made me wonder which word generated the most clicks. This post (along with&nbsp;two others I'm posting&nbsp;at the same time with 'dividends' and 'joke' in their respective&nbsp;headlines),&nbsp;is&nbsp;a short experiment and I will be reporting later on the results.</p>
<p>I assume the word sex is likely to attract the most people's attention and there is nothing more to be said about that here.</p>
<p>But if you did not read <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/">my&nbsp;original post</a> on dividends then you should. I will be banging the drum on that theme for a long time. It's important!</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-sex/">Assessing your investing IQ: More on Sex</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-sex/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/624978/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-sex/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividends</category><category>jokes</category><category>sex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Assessing your investing IQ: More on Dividends]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-dividends/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-dividends/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-dividends/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>Using the words <strong>'dividends'</strong>, 'sex' and 'joke' in the headline of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/">a recent post</a> has set it on fire. It made me wonder which word generated the most clicks. This post (along with two others I'm posting at the same time with 'sex' and 'joke' in their respective headlines), is a short experiment and I will be reporting later on the results.</p>
<p>I assume the word 'sex' is likely to attract the most people's attention, but&nbsp;the most important word is dividends. And if you don't learn more about this, then you are joking when it comes to investing. Whatever sex appeal you have will fade, and you will be poorer and wondering why.</p>
<p>So go back and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/">reread&nbsp;my post on dividends</a>!<strong> </strong>You won't regret it.<br /></p>
<p><strong></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-dividends/">Assessing your investing IQ: More on Dividends</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/04/dividends-are-very-sexy-no-joke/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-dividends/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/624976/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/assessing-your-investing-iq-more-on-dividends/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividends</category><category>jokes</category><category>sex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
