<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst initiations: Mako Surgical, ArcSight, ICU Medical]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/analyst-initiations-mako-surgical-arcsight-icu-medical/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/analyst-initiations-mako-surgical-arcsight-icu-medical/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/analyst-initiations-mako-surgical-arcsight-icu-medical/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> Mako Surgical, ArcSight and ICU Medical were today's noteworthy initiations:</p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mako-surgical-corp/mako/nas"> Mako Surgical</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mako-surgical-corp/mako/nas">MAKO</a>) was initiated with an Overweight rating at JP Morgan. The firm believes Mako has the most compelling system for navigated, robotic assisted orthopedic surgery to date. <br /></li>
    <li>After <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arc-sight-inc/arst/nas">ArcSight</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arc-sight-inc/arst/nas">ARST</a>) reported better-than-expected results for its Q3 and guidance for Q4 that Wachovia views as positive, the firm, which initiated shares with an Outperform rating, expects that regulatory compliance initiatives such as SOX will help protect the company from the slowdown, and help result in upward revisions to Wachovia's estimates in the future, as well as margin expansion. <br /></li>
    <li>Soleil believes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/icu-medical-inc/icui/nas">ICU Medical's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/icu-medical-inc/icui/nas">ICUI</a>) close distributor relationship with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hospira-inc/hsp/nys">Hospira</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hospira-inc/hsp/nys">HSP</a>) will drive its CLAVE/Custom IV franchises. The firm started shares with a Buy rating and $33 target.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>OTHER INITIATIONS:</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
    <li> Bear initiated <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/journal-communications-inc/jrn/nys">Journal Comm</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/journal-communications-inc/jrn/nys">JRN</a>) with an Outperform rating and $10.25 target. <br /></li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/koninklijke-kpn-n-v/kpn/nys">Royal KPN</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/koninklijke-kpn-n-v/kpn/nys">KPN</a>) was initiated at Societe Generale with a Sell rating. <br /></li>
    <li>Broadpoint assumed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nuance-communications-inc/nuan/nas">Nuance Comm</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nuance-communications-inc/nuan/nas">NUAN</a>) with a Buy rating and $22 target.</li>
    <p> </p>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/analyst-initiations-mako-surgical-arcsight-icu-medical/">Analyst initiations: Mako Surgical, ArcSight, ICU Medical</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/analyst-initiations-mako-surgical-arcsight-icu-medical/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1149564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/26/analyst-initiations-mako-surgical-arcsight-icu-medical/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>arcsight</category><category>arst</category><category>hospira</category><category>hsp</category><category>icu medical</category><category>icui</category><category>IcuMedical</category><category>initiation</category><category>journal</category><category>jrn</category><category>kpn</category><category>mako</category><category>nuan</category><category>nuance</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[I am a baby name Googler]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/i-am-a-baby-name-googler/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/i-am-a-baby-name-googler/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/i-am-a-baby-name-googler/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="truman, everett, and the unnamed google subject"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/boys_with_belly.jpg" />I'm pregnant, with my third child, and the ultrasound gods did not smile upon me. So whereas I was able to select my previous sons' names (Everett, a family name, and Truman, a presidential name that was distinguished by being both unusual and easily pronounceable) by the time I hit five months, with this baby, I'm lost in a sea of uncertainty -- and I only have a little more than two months to go. I have a girl's name, but for boys, what to do?<br /><br />So, I've been Googling. A friend suggested "Miles" and "Lowell" and (when paired with my husband's name) I quickly eliminated "Miles Hanson" as far too popular, so much so that it appeared on an <a href="http://www.irs.gov/publications/p505/ch03.html">IRS publication</a>. Ick. And <a href="http://www.home.earthlink.net/~lkh35/">this is the top result</a> for "Lowell Hanson" ... hmmm. While I ultimately discarded "Lowell" for other reasons, the Google factor was definitely in there.<br /><br />When other bloggers read the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>'s <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/youre-nobody-unless-your-name-googles/20070508072009990001">report on baby name Googling</a>, they showed a bit of skepticism; Brian White didn't really believe that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/googling-possible-baby-names/">brands are competing with baby names</a>, while Marc Perton thought Googling for unique names was, most importantly, <a href="http://www.perton.com/2007/05/08/seo-for-babies/">not a good SEO strategy</a>.<br /><br />Haha. When I saw the article I just Googled "Kohler Hanson." <a href="http://www.mbg.cornell.edu/cals/mbg/research/hanson-lab/kohler-jcs2000.cfm">Hmm...</a> not bad...<br /><br />If you have any good ideas, by all means, send 'em my way. You might want to Google first.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/i-am-a-baby-name-googler/">I am a baby name Googler</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 May 2007 16:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/i-am-a-baby-name-googler/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/892490/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/i-am-a-baby-name-googler/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baby</category><category>baby names</category><category>baby seo</category><category>BabyNames</category><category>BabySeo</category><category>Everett</category><category>everett hanson</category><category>EverettHanson</category><category>googler</category><category>googlicious</category><category>journal</category><category>kohler</category><category>name googling</category><category>NameGoogling</category><category>names</category><category>search engine optimization</category><category>SearchEngineOptimization</category><category>seo</category><category>truman</category><category>truman hanson</category><category>TrumanHanson</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More scrutiny for private equity firms]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/more-scrutiny-for-private-equity-firms/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/more-scrutiny-for-private-equity-firms/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/more-scrutiny-for-private-equity-firms/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a></p><p>As the Private Equity deal juggernaut continues at a record pace, the Justice Department continues to send out letters in their probe of PE competitive behavior. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116278409226914225.html?"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported today that Merrill Lynch &amp; Co., Inc. (NYSE:MER)</a> has joined this inauspicious list. Other letters in the same form, I am sure, will be received by other players. Any Justice Department investigation is bad news and a distraction, and I am sure there is concern throughout the PE industry. <br /><br />The question at hand is whether PE firms, in pursuing the "club" deals (many firms getting together to pursue a large target, like a bunch of hunters combining to wrestle an elephant) are "colluding" to bring down prices for the assets they are pursuing, thereby undertaking anti-competitive and thus illegal behavior. The <em>Journal </em>speculates that the Hertz transaction is under particular scrutiny. This was not only a large club deal but one where the buyers made a lot of money VERY quickly. To the Justice Department, I am sure, the fact that big bucks were made in short order MUST mean illegal activity. The Federal Government seems to frown upon large scale success, and therefore must investigate. <br /><br />I have not seen any of these love letters and can only speculate about the investigation, but the facts of life in Private Equity do not support a case for collusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/more-scrutiny-for-private-equity-firms/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More scrutiny for private equity firms</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/more-scrutiny-for-private-equity-firms/">More scrutiny for private equity firms</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116278409226914225.html?>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/more-scrutiny-for-private-equity-firms/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/697185/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/06/more-scrutiny-for-private-equity-firms/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>club deals</category><category>ClubDeals</category><category>deals</category><category>equity</category><category>hertz</category><category>journal</category><category>merrill</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>pe</category><category>private</category><category>private equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Rickertsen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:23:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
