<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Goldman Sachs Fraud Charge Creates Opportunity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><font><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg"  alt="Goldman Sachs GS logo" /></font>It always amazes me how "group think" sways the market to do stupid things, or at least jump to foolish conclusions.<br />
<br />
Today it was announced that Goldman Sachs Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) has been charged by the <font>Securities and Exchange Commission <a title="http://sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-59.htm" href="http://sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-59.htm">with defrauding investors</a> alleging that they knowingly misstated and omitted key facts about securities tied to sub prime mortgages during the rupturing of the housing bubble when they </font><font>structured and marketed a synthetic collateralized debt obligation (CDO) tied to the performance of subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS).<br />
<br />
<br />
</font><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Goldman Sachs Fraud Charge Creates Opportunity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/">Chasing Value: Goldman Sachs Fraud Charge Creates Opportunity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19443157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/16/chasing-value-goldman-sachs-opportunity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>civil charges</category><category>featured</category><category>Financial penalties</category><category>Goldman Sachs fraud</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group</category><category>GS</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>washington mutual</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase Up on Q1 News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/jpm-logo-200x150.gif" />JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) is a financial stock, and as such, you've got a right to be cautious about it, considering what's happened to the economy over the last couple years. Today, however, the equity, whose colleagues include Bank of America (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and Citigroup (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>), appears pretty appealing. Wall Street enjoyed the results of the bank's <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/jpmorgan-earnings-jump-55-surpassing-estimates/19439248/">first quarter</a>, expressing its opinion by sending in the buy order.</p>
<p>As of this writing, shares of the company are up well over 3%, on robust volume. The stock has been strong since its last downturn, which ended back in February, according to the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys/tech-chart">one-year chart</a>.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan Chase Up on Q1 News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/">JPMorgan Chase Up on Q1 News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/jpmorgan-earnings-jump-55-surpassing-estimates/19439248/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19439869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/14/jpmorgan-chase-up-on-q1-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>bank of america</category><category>banks</category><category>C</category><category>citigroup</category><category>financial</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Florida Insurance Bodies to Issue Bonds]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/florida-insurance-bodies-to-issue-bonds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/florida-insurance-bodies-to-issue-bonds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/florida-insurance-bodies-to-issue-bonds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img  alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/hurricane.jpg" />Florida's insurer for high-risk homeowner policies, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/hurricane-ready">Citizens Property Insurance Corp., is issuing a bond to beef up its balance sheet</a>. The state property insurer, which takes on the risks that private insurers in the state will not, is looking to raise around $2.5 billion. <br />
<br />
The "pre-sale" ends on April 6, 2009 and was called "very successful" by Citizens CFO Sharon Binnun, who continued, "We met our liquidity goal for the year." A quiet <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/hurricane/">hurricane</a> season in 2009 left Citizens, the largest property insurer in the state, with a surplus of around $14 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/florida-insurance-bodies-to-issue-bonds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Florida Insurance Bodies to Issue Bonds</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/florida-insurance-bodies-to-issue-bonds/">Florida Insurance Bodies to Issue Bonds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/hurricane-ready>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/florida-insurance-bodies-to-issue-bonds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19419533/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/florida-insurance-bodies-to-issue-bonds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>citizens</category><category>florida</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>hurricane</category><category>Hurricanes</category><category>insurance</category><category>insurance companies</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>Raymond James Financial</category><category>rjf</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/rich.jpg"  alt="" />Thanks to a trillion dollars in credit losses write-downs on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mortgage/">mortgage</a>-related securities in 2007 and 2008, financial companies around the world had a lot of capital to recapture. So, in the first half of 2009, they issued stock. More than half the new shares to come out worldwide in those six months were <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1">issued by banks and brokers</a>. All this stock, of course, translated to fees for investment banks. In a strange way, consequently, the financial industry healed itself.<br />
<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1">According to Bloomberg</a>, investment banking fees surged 13% in 2009, from $53.1 billion to $59.8 billion. This is still far short of the $86.9 billion record set in 2007, but it's at least a step in the right direction. Even with the surge of bank and broker shares issued in the first two quarters last year, total activity was still lower than in 2008.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/">JPMorgan Leads in Year Bankers Make Money on Each Other</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=amySc2iSiW9c&amp;pos=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19382910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/jpmorgan-leads-in-year-bankers-make-money-on-each-other/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>credit suisse</category><category>cs</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investment banking</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>merck</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MRK</category><category>ms</category><category>Schering-Plough</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Not In Demand After Q4 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/200px-goldman_sachs_logo.jpg" alt="" />One of the true icons of finance, Goldman Sachs Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>), issued its Q4 report this morning. The stock has been weak off the numbers; at the time of this writing, shares were down well over 5%, and volume was very active. Looking through the <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/goldman-sachs-reports-earnings-per-common-share-of-22-13-for-2009/rfid291470256?channel=pf">press release</a>, I didn't come away as bearish as the market. Then again, the session as a whole was rather choppy, so perhaps overall sentiment was exerting an influence. Still, a 5% sell-off is notable. </p>
<p>Let's look at some highlights. For the fourth quarter, Goldman, whose colleagues include JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) and Morgan Stanley (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>), made $8.20 per share. Last year at this time, the company reported a loss of $4.97 per share. Besides improving year-over-year, per-share profit increased over 50% on a sequential basis as well. According to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=gs">Earnings.com</a>, $5.20 was the number to beat. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs Not In Demand After Q4 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/">Goldman Sachs Not In Demand After Q4 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/goldman-sachs-reports-earnings-per-common-share-of-22-13-for-2009/rfid291470256?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19326250/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/goldman-sachs-not-in-demand-after-q4-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>financial</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>JPM</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>MS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investment Banking Unit Pushes JPM to Strong Profit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/jpm-logo-200x150.gif" />Thanks to strong results from its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/investmentbanking/">investment banking</a> unit, JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys" target="_blank">JPM</a>) was able to turn in a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60E1UO20100115">fourth quarter profit</a> of $3.3 billion. This is a profound increase from the Q4 profit of $702 million posted in 2008. <br /><br />JPM, which is the second largest bank in the U.S. in terms of assets, has performed best throughout the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/financialcrisis/">financial crisis</a>, as evidenced by its substantial year-over-year increase in Q4 profit. For the last quarter of last year, JPM generated $25.2 billion in revenue.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investment Banking Unit Pushes JPM to Strong Profit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/">Investment Banking Unit Pushes JPM to Strong Profit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60E1UO20100115>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19318164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/investment-banking-unit-pushes-jpm-to-strong-profit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank</category><category>banking</category><category>banking sector</category><category>BankingSector</category><category>banks</category><category>featured</category><category>investment bank</category><category>investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banks subsidizing auto TARP, extra money could be spent]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><p>The bailouts of late 2008 and 2009 have cost the American taxpayers $61 billion, according to the <a href="http://www.treasury.gov" target="_blank">Treasury Department</a>, but <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-12-09-bailouts_N.htm" target="_blank">the banks aren't to blame this time</a>. The auto manufacturer bailout, which includes Chrysler and General Motors (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corp-1-5percent-prf-ser-d/grm/nys" target="_blank">GRM</a>), has cost the country more than $30 billion, with American International Group (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys" target="_blank">AIG</a>) consuming another $30 billion.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Bank of America (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">BAC</a>) has already made good with the government, and several banks -- such as Capital One (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capital-one-financial-corporation/cof/nys" target="_blank">COF</a>), JP Morgan Chase (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys" target="_blank">JPM</a>) and TCF Financial (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tcf-financial-corporation/tcb/nys" target="_blank">TCB</a>) -- only have to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/capital-one-warrants-help-chip-away-tarp-obligation/">clean up situations</a> regarding the warrants they've issued. And interestingly, the losses from the bailouts on AIG and auto manufacturers are being offset by profits from the bank bailouts, which could generate additional funds of up to $19.5 billion. <br />   </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Banks subsidizing auto TARP, extra money could be spent</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/">Banks subsidizing auto TARP, extra money could be spent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19272756/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>auto</category><category>auto industry</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>Capital One Financial</category><category>CapitalOneFinancial</category><category>COF</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>grm</category><category>insurance</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>tarp</category><category>TCB</category><category>TCF Financial</category><category>TcfFinancial</category><category>timothy geithner</category><category>TimothyGeithner</category><category>treasury</category><category>Troubled Asset Relief Program</category><category>TroubledAssetReliefProgram</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Fortune's 25 leaders among leaders]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mmm/" rel="tag">3M Corporation (MMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cl/" rel="tag">Colgate-Palmolive (CL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lly/" rel="tag">Lilly (Eli) (LLY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/de/" rel="tag">Deere and Co (DE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ul/" rel="tag">Unilever ADR (UL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-screen/" rel="tag">Stock Screen</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chl/" rel="tag">China Mobile Limited (CHL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/icici-bank-ibn-1/" rel="tag">ICICI Bank (IBN)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/ibm_logo_200x150.gif" alt="" />The recent issue of <em>Fortune</em> magazine discusses how the best of the best train, guide and nurture top managers <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/11/19/news/companies/top_leadership_companies.fortune/index.htm">to become the leaders</a> that will propel their corporations successfully forward. They list the top 25 companies, which I have used as the basis of a new review to see how they would fair against common metric screens.</p>
<p>In the past few months, many articles have posited that large-cap stocks should excel in the coming year based on their lagging the market behind smaller, more volatile stocks flying out of the March lows. I do not believe this is universally true. Plenty of large-cap stocks did well, such as Anadarko Petroleum (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anadarko-petroleum-corporation/apc/nys">APC</a>), Apple (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), while many small caps went nowhere. Even among the large caps included in Fortune's "Leadership 25," some have doubled.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Fortune's 25 leaders among leaders</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/">Serious Money: Fortune's 25 leaders among leaders</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19256939/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/30/serious-money-fortunes-25-leaders-among-leaders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3m</category><category>AAPL</category><category>american-express</category><category>anadarko petroleum</category><category>APC</category><category>Apple</category><category>axp</category><category>china mobile</category><category>CHL</category><category>CL</category><category>colgate-palmolive</category><category>DE</category><category>Deere</category><category>Eli Lilly</category><category>exxonmobil</category><category>FDX</category><category>featured</category><category>federal express</category><category>FedEx</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>general mills</category><category>GIS</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IBM</category><category>IBN</category><category>icici</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnsonandjohnson</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>Lilly</category><category>LLY</category><category>LMT</category><category>lockheed martin</category><category>MCD</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>MMM</category><category>PEP</category><category>pepsico</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>raytheon</category><category>RTN</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>UL</category><category>unilever</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEO turnover down, not out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" alt="" />It's still a tough time to be a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CEO/">CEO</a>. In October, 89 top dogs moved on (by choice   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/CEO_turnover_Down_but_not_out'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>    or not). Though this is 15% lower than the 105 in September and 29% off the whopping 125 CEOs who turned over a year earlier, it's still a sign that "stability" doesn't equal "recovery."
<p>The latest study that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a> revealed to <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a></em> reports that October was the eighth month this year in which CEO turnover was down year-over-year. Through the end of last month, 1,028 CEO positions changed hands -- down 18% from the 1,257 by the same point in 2008. In fact, the tally for the first 10 months of 2009 is the lowest since 2004, when the big office found only 561 new inhabitants. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/financialindustry/">financial industry</a> remains the toughest place for CEOs, with 19 leaving the job last month. Even though the situation has gotten easier, this industry still has the highest turnover. For the year, approximately 10% of all CEO departures (106) have been in the financial sector. "The financial industry is still incredibly volatile, as both October and September saw major announcements from leading companies including <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and last month's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bankruptcy/">bankruptcy</a> of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CITGroup/">CIT Group</a>, which led to the exit of CEO <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/JeffreyPeek/">Jeffrey Peek</a>," John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas, says. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CEO turnover down, not out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/">CEO turnover down, not out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235752/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceo compensation</category><category>ceo pay</category><category>ceos</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>cit group</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>financial industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jeffrey peek</category><category>JeffreyPeek</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>jpmorganchasejpm</category><category>turnover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase crushes third-quarter earnings forecast]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/jpmorgan-chase-crushes-third-quarter-earnings-forecast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/jpmorgan-chase-crushes-third-quarter-earnings-forecast/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/jpmorgan-chase-crushes-third-quarter-earnings-forecast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/jpm-jpmorgan-logo.jpg" />Tuesday morning greeted us with earnings from banking behemoth <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>). The company said it earned  $3.59 billion and that it nearly doubled the amount of money it saved for loan losses in the third quarter. <br /><br />Breaking the results down into per-share earnings, JPM trounced the consensus estimate. The bank earned 82 cents per share, nearly <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/jpmorgan-clobbers-earnings-estimates/716839">double the expected 49 cents per share</a>. Quarterly revenue increased to $26.62 billion from last year's <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jp-morgan-profit-jumps-past-estimates-2009-10-14">same-quarter revenue of $14.74 billion</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/jpmorgan-chase-crushes-third-quarter-earnings-forecast/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan Chase crushes third-quarter earnings forecast</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/jpmorgan-chase-crushes-third-quarter-earnings-forecast/">JPMorgan Chase crushes third-quarter earnings forecast</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/jpmorgan-chase-crushes-third-quarter-earnings-forecast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19195374/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/14/jpmorgan-chase-crushes-third-quarter-earnings-forecast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>c</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>financial sector</category><category>financial stocks</category><category>FinancialSector</category><category>FinancialStocks</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>JPMorgan Chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer bankruptcies set to surge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/consumer-bankruptcies-set-to-surge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/consumer-bankruptcies-set-to-surge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/consumer-bankruptcies-set-to-surge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/badcredit.jpg" />Consumer bankruptcies have already <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20603037&amp;sid=au04p.PrHKhA">spiked more than 30% this year</a>, and it looks like the trend shows no signs of flagging. The American Bankruptcy Institute predicts that the tally could hit 1.4 million by the end of the year. So, although there are some experts signaling that the economy is on the upswing, the downstream effects of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bankruptcy/">bankruptcy</a> on consumer spending and corporate balance sheets are going to make it difficult for the market to turn the corner. </p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Consumer_bankruptcies_set_to_surge'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>In July, more than 126,000 people filed for bankruptcy protection, and the filing rate was up 36.5% for the first six months of 2009 relative to the same period in 2008. The problem is affecting every rung of the social ladder.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/consumer-bankruptcies-set-to-surge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer bankruptcies set to surge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/consumer-bankruptcies-set-to-surge/">Consumer bankruptcies set to surge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20603037&amp;sid=au04p.PrHKhA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/consumer-bankruptcies-set-to-surge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19125516/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/consumer-bankruptcies-set-to-surge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcies</category><category>consumer credit</category><category>ConsumerCredit</category><category>credit card</category><category>CreditCard</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jamie dimon</category><category>JamieDimon</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>lenny dykstra</category><category>LennyDykstra</category><category>stephen baldwin</category><category>StephenBaldwin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JP Morgan easily tops Q2 earnings expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/jp-morgan-easily-tops-q2-earnings-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/jp-morgan-easily-tops-q2-earnings-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/jp-morgan-easily-tops-q2-earnings-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/jpm-jpmorgan-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Investment bank <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) announced that <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/jpmorgan-profit-tops-street-expectations/574386">second-quarter earnings checked in at 28 cents per share</a> -- or $2.72 billion. A year ago, the financial giant reported earnings of $2 billion, or 53 cents per share. This year's quarterly earnings included a charge of 27 cents per share after JPM repaid the $25 billion invested by the government in the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). There was also a 10-cent-per-share penalty thanks to a special assessment from the FDIC. Expectations called for earnings of four cents per share.<br /><br />JPM also reported record first-half revenue, stemming from "solid" performances in its commercial banking, asset management, treasury and security services, and its retail banking. That said, JPM expects credit costs to remain elevated in the "foreseeable future." No doubt that these results will lend some bullish momentum to Wall Street today, as JPM's earnings reinforce the quarterly results from Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS). <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/jp-morgan-easily-tops-q2-earnings-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JP Morgan easily tops Q2 earnings expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/jp-morgan-easily-tops-q2-earnings-expectations/">JP Morgan easily tops Q2 earnings expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/jp-morgan-easily-tops-q2-earnings-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099719/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/jp-morgan-easily-tops-q2-earnings-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPMorgan Chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>quarterly earnings</category><category>quarterly results</category><category>QuarterlyEarnings</category><category>QuarterlyResults</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase slides after waiving right to buy its stock warrants]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/jpmorgan-chase-slides-after-waiving-right-to-buy-its-stock-warra/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/jpmorgan-chase-slides-after-waiving-right-to-buy-its-stock-warra/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/jpmorgan-chase-slides-after-waiving-right-to-buy-its-stock-warra/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/jpm-jpmorgan-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) and the U.S. government can't seem to agree what the bank's stock warrants are worth. As a result, JPM has asked the Treasury Department to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN1049927320090710?rpc=33">auction off the warrants</a> publicly in order to determine a fair market price. </p>
<p>The JPM warrants were issued to the government under the terms of its TARP loan. Bailed-out banks have the option to repurchase their own warrants, but only if they can strike a deal with the feds regarding a reasonable price. However, many firms have complained that the Treasury is seeking too high a price for the assets -- putting executives in the awkward position of claiming that their stock just isn't worth that much.</p>
<p>In choosing the auction alternative, JPMorgan is waiving its right to repurchase its own warrants (it could potentially bid through the public auction process, but company executives have decided not to do so). If the stock warrants are successfully auctioned off to a third party, their exercise would be dilutive to existing shareholders.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/jpmorgan-chase-slides-after-waiving-right-to-buy-its-stock-warra/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JPMorgan Chase slides after waiving right to buy its stock warrants</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/jpmorgan-chase-slides-after-waiving-right-to-buy-its-stock-warra/">JPMorgan Chase slides after waiving right to buy its stock warrants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/jpmorgan-chase-slides-after-waiving-right-to-buy-its-stock-warra/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19094213/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/10/jpmorgan-chase-slides-after-waiving-right-to-buy-its-stock-warra/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan Chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>options</category><category>stock warrants</category><category>StockWarrants</category><category>TARP</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>Treasury Department</category><category>TreasuryDepartment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Economics -- art or science]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bni/" rel="tag">Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/question-mark01.jpg" />In running a very tight stock screen recently for value plays<a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys/key-ratios"> Burlington Northern Santa Fe</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys/key-ratios">BNI</a>) showed up on a list of 14 stocks. Interestingly all the large railroad stocks did. This reminded me of several stories I have done on the subject, the most recent being <a title="View Chasing Value: Watch BNI -- the heck with Citigroup on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/chasing-value-watch-bni-the-heck-with-citigroup/" target="_blank">Chasing Value: Watch BNI -- the heck with Citigroup</a>.</p>
<p>To summarize, about six weeks ago a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) analyst declared it was time to sell the stock when BNI was trading in the mid $60s -- I said <em>investors should do the opposite, it was a great value</em>. Friday the stock closed at $76.98. Even at this price it is a value and ever more so with oil prices steadly creeping up.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Economics -- art or science</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/">Sunday Funnies: Economics -- art or science</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19060017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>bni</category><category>burlington northern</category><category>BurlingtonNorthern</category><category>c</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>dollar cost averaging</category><category>DollarCostAveraging</category><category>index funds</category><category>IndexFunds</category><category>jp morgan chase</category><category>jpm</category><category>JpMorganChase</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>sunday funnies</category><category>SundayFunnies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: The safest bank in the U.S. -- Wells Fargo]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/chasing-value-the-safest-bank-in-the-us-wells-fargo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/chasing-value-the-safest-bank-in-the-us-wells-fargo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/chasing-value-the-safest-bank-in-the-us-wells-fargo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bk/" rel="tag">Bank of New York (BK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/usb/" rel="tag">U.S. Bancorp (USB)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/wells-fargo-wfc-logo.gif" />It is being reported today in the <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/stories/2009/03/02/daily45.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">Business Journal</span></a> that the safest bank in the United States is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo &amp; Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>).<br /><br />According to <span class="story_clink">Global Finance</span>, which will publish its analysis, "World's 50 Safest Banks" in its April issue, international banks dominate the rankings, which show the effects of the sub-prime mortgage meltdown and credit crisis brought on by large Wall Street players. San Francisco-based Wells Fargo is the top-rated U.S. bank at No. 21. European banks now dominate the rankings, with only four U.S. banks among the listing.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/chasing-value-the-safest-bank-in-the-us-wells-fargo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: The safest bank in the U.S. -- Wells Fargo</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/chasing-value-the-safest-bank-in-the-us-wells-fargo/">Chasing Value: The safest bank in the U.S. -- Wells Fargo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/chasing-value-the-safest-bank-in-the-us-wells-fargo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1481150/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/chasing-value-the-safest-bank-in-the-us-wells-fargo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank of new york mellon</category><category>BankOfNewYorkMellon</category><category>bk</category><category>C</category><category>Chasing Value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>features</category><category>JPM</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>Safest Banks</category><category>SafestBanks</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>us bancorp</category><category>USB</category><category>UsBancorp</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WellsFargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What will move the Dow? A look inside the average]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/what-will-move-the-dow-a-look-inside-the-average/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/what-will-move-the-dow-a-look-inside-the-average/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/what-will-move-the-dow-a-look-inside-the-average/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"What can get this market going again?" asks <a href="http://www.dripinvestor.com/index.asp">Chuck Carlson</a>. In <a href="http://www.dripinvestor.com/index.asp">The DRIP Investor</a> he says, "It's helpful to understand what stocks within the Dow need to do well for the index to do well." </p>
<p>"Not surprisingly, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys"> IBM</a>), the highest-priced stock in the Dow, carries the greatest weighting at more than 9% of the index. Obviously, with such a heavy weighting in the index, IBM will need to be a decent performer for the Dow to do well going forward.</p>
<p>"And when you total up the exposure of IBM with the other tech stocks in the Dow - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) - the total tech weighting in the Dow is 16%. Thus, tech stocks matter to the Dow, so it is diffcult to see the Dow sustaining a move upward without a nice rebound in the tech sector.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/what-will-move-the-dow-a-look-inside-the-average/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What will move the Dow? A look inside the average</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/what-will-move-the-dow-a-look-inside-the-average/">What will move the Dow? A look inside the average</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/what-will-move-the-dow-a-look-inside-the-average/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1479604/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/what-will-move-the-dow-a-look-inside-the-average/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>american express</category><category>AmericanExpress</category><category>axp</category><category>bac</category><category>bank of america</category><category>c</category><category>chevron</category><category>chuck carlson</category><category>ChuckCarlson</category><category>citicroup</category><category>cvx</category><category>dow components</category><category>dow stocks</category><category>DowComponents</category><category>DowStocks</category><category>drip investor</category><category>DripInvestor</category><category>exxon mobil</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>hewlett packard</category><category>HewlettPackard</category><category>hpq</category><category>ibm</category><category>intc</category><category>intel</category><category>international business machines</category><category>InternationalBusinessMachines</category><category>jp morgan chase</category><category>jpm</category><category>JpMorganChase</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>xom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Foreclosures halted by two big banks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/foreclosure.jpg" alt="moratorium on foreclosures" />The alarming rate at which foreclosures have been rising over the past year is definitely something to be concerned about. Today, some homeowners are getting a little breathing room as a couple of the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/big-banks-announce-foreclosure/342619">biggest banks are granting a moratorium on foreclosures</a>.<br /><br />As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/lita-epstein">Lita Epstein</a> pointed out yesterday, last month was the tenth month in a row where foreclosures were in excess of 250,000 as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/more-than-250-000-homes-face-foreclosure-filings-for-10th-straig/">274,399 foreclosures were filed in January</a>. The foreclosure epidemic has been a serious drain on the overall economy, and it is hoped that the Obama administration is going to be able to develop a plan to help keep homeowners in their homes.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Foreclosures halted by two big banks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/">Foreclosures halted by two big banks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1459708/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/foreclosures-halted-by-two-big-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>housing</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan Chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>judges</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Great News: JPMorgan Chase profit down 76%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/great-news-jpmorgan-chase-profit-down-76/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/great-news-jpmorgan-chase-profit-down-76/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/great-news-jpmorgan-chase-profit-down-76/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/jpm-jpmorgan-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In an era when banks can lose $10 billion in a single quarter, it is actually amazing that any financial institution can earn a profit. When we look forward to fixing the economic disaster left for the next president to fix, we may wonder why we give so much control of the world economy to people who take such enormous risks while earning more money than anyone else on the planet -- even as they leave the rest of us to pay for their mistakes. That situation must change.</p>
<p>It looks, though, like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"><strong>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) will not be the guiltiest of the parties in this respect. Granted, JPMorgan did get <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/24/why-jpmorgan-wants-to-pay-five-times-more-for-bear-stearns/">$30 billion</a> in protection from the U.S. to bail out Bear Stearns and it took <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/nine-banks-to-get-125-billion-will-the-other-8-486-crater/">$25 billion</a> from the TARP. But at least it is still making a profit -- albeit a much smaller one than it did in the fourth quarter of 2007. Specifically, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aM5FfkHGrRyw&amp;refer=home">JPMorgan made $702 million</a> in the fourth quarter or 7 cents a share -- down 76% from the $3 billion it earned in the same period last year. (However, without a $1.3 billion gain from closing a joint venture and "risk- management results," JPMorgan would have lost 28 cents a share.)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/great-news-jpmorgan-chase-profit-down-76/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Great News: JPMorgan Chase profit down 76%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/great-news-jpmorgan-chase-profit-down-76/">Great News: JPMorgan Chase profit down 76%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/great-news-jpmorgan-chase-profit-down-76/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1430331/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/great-news-jpmorgan-chase-profit-down-76/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why do BAC and JPM want to be Citigroup?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/why-does-bac-and-jpm-want-to-be-citigroup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/why-does-bac-and-jpm-want-to-be-citigroup/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/why-does-bac-and-jpm-want-to-be-citigroup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/bac-bank-of-america-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />If we keep hearing about companies that are "too big to fail" what in the world are we doing allowing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: JPM) to swallow up everything in their financial path so that they can become even bigger, potentially <em><strong>creating the next catastrophe!</strong></em> <br /><br />During my tenure at BloggingStocks I have made some bonehead calls and some that were more astute. Among my better calls was the story I wrote 20 months ago, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/23/break-up-citigroup-as-soon-as-possible/">Break up Citigroup as soon as possible</a>, and the follow on story a year later when nothing had changed: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/citigroup-should-hire-forensic-auditors/">Citigroup should hire forensic auditors</a>. My colleagues Peter Cohan and Douglas McIntyre made similar points.<br /><br />Given these stories and the dialog I have had with many of our intelligent and equally frustrated readers, I have had thoughts of starting a non-profit organization to shadow the Securities and Exchange Commission that has been dormant for the last ten years. Instead of hiring Wall Street types to run the SEC we might do better hiring inquisitive university students, and not from the business or law schools, but the accounting, journalism and <em>criminology</em> programs.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/why-does-bac-and-jpm-want-to-be-citigroup/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why do BAC and JPM want to be Citigroup?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/why-does-bac-and-jpm-want-to-be-citigroup/">Why do BAC and JPM want to be Citigroup?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/why-does-bac-and-jpm-want-to-be-citigroup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1420301/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/why-does-bac-and-jpm-want-to-be-citigroup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>Banks</category><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>feature</category><category>features</category><category>JPM</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banks not disclosing billions -- why all the secrecy, Paulson?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/banks-not-disclosing-billions-why-all-the-secrecy-paulson/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/banks-not-disclosing-billions-why-all-the-secrecy-paulson/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/banks-not-disclosing-billions-why-all-the-secrecy-paulson/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/paulsonpic.jpg" alt="" />A spokesman for <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1229947729_0"><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) </span>Thomas Kelly said his firm <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/how-are-bailout-funds-being-spent/284237">has not disclosed what it did</a> with the $25 billion in emergency bailout money it has received. In fact, JPMorgan Chase is declining to provide any such disclosure.</p>
<p><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/how-are-bailout-funds-being-spent/284237">AP has reported</a> that none of the 21 banks that received $1 billion or more from taxpayers is tracking, or at least willing to disclose how they are using the money. Let me be clear -- <em>THIS STINKS TO THE HIGH HEAVENS!</em></p>
<p>What kind of deals did Treasury Secretary Paulson make with these favored financial institutions? The money would be very easy to track. Why wouldn't that be a part of the bargain? </p>
<p>Paulson obviously did not read <a title="View Conservative bankers? Surely you jest! on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/did-you-ever-think-banks-were-conservative/" target="_blank">Conservative bankers? Surely you jest!</a>, but he should have. Of course, having former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) CEO Paulson negotiate with his Wall Street buddies on behalf of the taxpayer is highly suspect. At a minimum we have the <em>good 'ol boy</em> network operating in full form.</p>
<p>The banks simply are avoiding what should be required scrutiny by pleading ignorance. I don't believe the money can't be tracked, or even traced now after the fact. What happened to the idea of more transparency? More cover up I fear!</p>
<p>The banks should be subject to full disclosure. The use of the funds should be subject to review. Government money should be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Why all the secrecy?</p>
<p><strong>PS:</strong> Personal emails I have been receiving and the initial comments indicate strong sentiment about this issue. I encourage those that care to forward this story to their elected officials and friends encouraging full disclosure -- as promised! Obama used the internet to help win the White House, lets use it to get someone to listen with an internet blast from all over the country!<br /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture and planning firm. <span class="symbol"><em>He writes the columns </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/"><em>Chasing Value</em></a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/"><em>Serious Money</em></a><em>.</em></span></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/banks-not-disclosing-billions-why-all-the-secrecy-paulson/">Banks not disclosing billions -- why all the secrecy, Paulson?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/how-are-bailout-funds-being-spent/284237>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/banks-not-disclosing-billions-why-all-the-secrecy-paulson/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1408707/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/banks-not-disclosing-billions-why-all-the-secrecy-paulson/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AP and Banks</category><category>ApAndBanks</category><category>bailout</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>hank paulson</category><category>HankPaulson</category><category>jp morgan chase</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorganChase</category><category>paulson</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:44:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
