<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[CEO turnover down, not out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" alt="" />It's still a tough time to be a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CEO/">CEO</a>. In October, 89 top dogs moved on (by choice   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/CEO_turnover_Down_but_not_out'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>    or not). Though this is 15% lower than the 105 in September and 29% off the whopping 125 CEOs who turned over a year earlier, it's still a sign that "stability" doesn't equal "recovery."
<p>The latest study that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a> revealed to <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a></em> reports that October was the eighth month this year in which CEO turnover was down year-over-year. Through the end of last month, 1,028 CEO positions changed hands -- down 18% from the 1,257 by the same point in 2008. In fact, the tally for the first 10 months of 2009 is the lowest since 2004, when the big office found only 561 new inhabitants. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/financialindustry/">financial industry</a> remains the toughest place for CEOs, with 19 leaving the job last month. Even though the situation has gotten easier, this industry still has the highest turnover. For the year, approximately 10% of all CEO departures (106) have been in the financial sector. "The financial industry is still incredibly volatile, as both October and September saw major announcements from leading companies including <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and last month's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/bankruptcy/">bankruptcy</a> of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CITGroup/">CIT Group</a>, which led to the exit of CEO <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/JeffreyPeek/">Jeffrey Peek</a>," John A. Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas, says. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CEO turnover down, not out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/">CEO turnover down, not out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19235752/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/ceo-turnover-down-not-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>ceo</category><category>ceo compensation</category><category>ceo pay</category><category>ceos</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>cit group</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>financial industry</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jeffrey peek</category><category>JeffreyPeek</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>jpmorganchasejpm</category><category>turnover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Wachovia buy Morgan Stanley? And will anyone pick up WaMu?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/will-wachovia-buy-morgan-stanley-and-will-anyone-pick-up-wamu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/will-wachovia-buy-morgan-stanley-and-will-anyone-pick-up-wamu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/will-wachovia-buy-morgan-stanley-and-will-anyone-pick-up-wamu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" alt="" />This morning, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/100-year-crash-is-morgan-stanley-next/">speculated</a> that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><font color="#888888">Morgan Stanley</font></a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><font color="#888888">MS</font></a>) might reunite with its former parent -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"><strong><font color="#888888">JPMorgan Chase</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys"><font color="#888888">JPM</font></a>). It looks like I was wrong about that. But the basic idea of finding a merger partner for Morgan Stanley is still alive. The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/business/18morgan.html?hp">New York Times</a></em> reports that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">Wachovia</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">WB</a>) has been in talks with Morgan Stanley about a possible combination.</p>
<p>Morgan Stanley's stock fell another 24% today and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys"><strong><font color="#888888">Washington Mutual</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys"><font color="#888888">WM</font></a>), about which I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/will-wamu-failure-wipe-out-fdic-reserve-fund/">posted</a> this morning, hired <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) to find a buyer. So it could be that less than a decade after Congress repealed the Glass-Steagall act -- which prohibited investment and commercial banks from combining -- we will solve our current catastrophic financial problems by reconstituting the very thing that contributed so heavily to the Great Depression.</p>
<p>This looks to me like a desperate move that is only possible because commercial banks were required -- due to their regulations -- to hold more capital than investment banks. The investment banks were vulnerable because they bought such a huge volume of complex securities that nobody now wants to buy. And the decline in the value of these securities is wiping out the slim sliver of capital that they held.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/will-wachovia-buy-morgan-stanley-and-will-anyone-pick-up-wamu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Wachovia buy Morgan Stanley? And will anyone pick up WaMu?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/will-wachovia-buy-morgan-stanley-and-will-anyone-pick-up-wamu/">Will Wachovia buy Morgan Stanley? And will anyone pick up WaMu?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/business/18morgan.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/will-wachovia-buy-morgan-stanley-and-will-anyone-pick-up-wamu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1317217/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/will-wachovia-buy-morgan-stanley-and-will-anyone-pick-up-wamu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>gs</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>jpmorgan chase jpm</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>JpmorganChaseJpm</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>ms</category><category>wachovia</category><category>wachovia bank</category><category>WachoviaBank</category><category>wb</category><category>wm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JPMorgan CEO: Our best mortgages are 'terrible and we're sorry']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/jpmorgan-ceo-our-best-mortgages-are-terrible-and-were-sorry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/jpmorgan-ceo-our-best-mortgages-are-terrible-and-were-sorry/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/jpmorgan-ceo-our-best-mortgages-are-terrible-and-were-sorry/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/jpm-jpmorgan-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/17/the-cloud-behind-jpmorgans-silver-lining/">DealBook</a></em> reports that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) CEO Jamie Dimon let out some bad news on JPMorgan's conference call today. Despite <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200807171356DOWJONESDJONLINE000801_FORTUNE5.htm">beating estimates</a>, DealBook reported that JP Morgan's highest quality, so-called Prime mortgages, were, as Dimon said, "terrible, and we're sorry. We can say it eight times. It looks terrible."</p>
<p>Prime mortgages are not supposed to behave like subprime ones. But disappointment seems to be the big theme with the mortgage industry. Prime mortgages barely defaulted at all in the second quarter of 2007 -- JPMorgan wrote off 0.05% of them a year ago -- taking a $4 million charge. But in the same quarter of 2008, JPMorgan wrote off 0.91% -- and charged off $104 million.</p>
<p>And Dimon expects those Prime losses to triple -- to $300 million. If there's any good news, that $300 million is a mere 15% of the net income it earned this quarter. Still, it suggests the depth of the economic problems that lie ahead.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the cohan="" letter=""></the></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/jpmorgan-ceo-our-best-mortgages-are-terrible-and-were-sorry/">JPMorgan CEO: Our best mortgages are 'terrible and we're sorry'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/jpmorgan-ceo-our-best-mortgages-are-terrible-and-were-sorry/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1259486/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/jpmorgan-ceo-our-best-mortgages-are-terrible-and-were-sorry/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jamie dimon</category><category>JamieDimon</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>jpmorgan chase jpm</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>jpmorganchaseearn...</category><category>jpmorganchasejpm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings roundup: Merrill to lose, tech to win?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/earnings-roundup-merrill-to-lose-tech-to-win/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/earnings-roundup-merrill-to-lose-tech-to-win/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/earnings-roundup-merrill-to-lose-tech-to-win/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a></p><p><em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-markets-stocks.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">Reuters</a></em> reports that today is a big one for bank and technology earnings. It looks like <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) will lose big and will try to soften the blow with an announcement about selling its 20% of Bloomberg LP for <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aiQOV5g.sdEQ&amp;refer=home">$4.5 billion</a> to its founder, New York mayor, Michael Bloomberg. <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-and-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) and a handful of big technology companies are expected to report profits. But will they be enough?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, how can we make sense of yesterday's 276 point rally on Wall Street? Nobody knows what happened, but theories abound: the price of oil fell -- possibly due to anticipation that the Fed would raise interest rates to deal with inflation that is roaring out of control. Higher interest rates would strengthen the dollar, which would drive down the price of oil since it's traded in dollars. But I think yesterday's market was a short-covering frenzy. With the SEC foolishly squeezing the shorts, they needed to cover their bets that financials would fall further. Of course <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2008/07/14/daily33.html?ana=from_rss">good news</a> from <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) didn't hurt.</p>
<p>Today's earnings -- with estimates courtesy of a Reuters analyst survey -- are likely to move the market. Here's a roundup:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>Merrill Lynch is expected to lose $1.94</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>JPMorgan was expected to make $0.44, down 63% from 2007. At a Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio of 0.4 and a P/E of 12 on earnings forecast to grow <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?Symbol=JPM">31%</a> to $3.34 in 2009, it looks cheap. <em><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/17/news/companies/jpmorgan/index.htm?eref=aol">CNNMoney</a></em> reports it made 54 cents -- well ahead of expectations and its shares are up 5% in premarket.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) will earn 47 cents a share, a 21% increase from last year. At a PEG ratio of 1.1 and a P/E of 15 on earnings forecast to grow 14.3% to <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/analyst/earnest.asp?symbol=msft">$2.16</a> in 2009, it looks reasonably priced.</div>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/earnings-roundup-merrill-to-lose-tech-to-win/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings roundup: Merrill to lose, tech to win?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/earnings-roundup-merrill-to-lose-tech-to-win/">Earnings roundup: Merrill to lose, tech to win?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/earnings-roundup-merrill-to-lose-tech-to-win/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1258861/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/earnings-roundup-merrill-to-lose-tech-to-win/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bloomberg</category><category>bloomberg lp</category><category>BloombergLp</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>ibm</category><category>ibmcorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>jpmorgan chase jpm</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>JpmorganChaseJpm</category><category>mer</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>wfc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:57:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
